EXPOSE HIM: Here’s how George Soros is funding today’s riots & chaos


News on the Net image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By  — Glenn Beck—— Bio and ArchivesSeptember 17, 2020

 

Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich was awkwardly cut off yesterday by Fox News hosts after he correctly explained how George Soros is funding today’s riots and chaos: he uses money to elect corrupt District Attorneys throughout the nation, who then release criminals onto the streets. So, why is Soros off limits? Glenn says he won’t play the game of the mainstream media, and he’ll continue to expose Soros. Because his fingerprints are EVERYWHERE. We have to know what’s going on, and we HAVE to stand with the rule of law.—More…

Government habitually inflates disasters, hides adverse consequences


The saddest part of the one-sided government and media blitz is how pathetically frightened are ill-informed consumers who believe they have superior information

A. Dru Kristenev imageRe-Posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesSeptember 17, 2020

Government habitually inflates disasters, hides adverse consequences

In the usual way that government authoritarians strive to never let a crisis go to waste, as we recall Rahm Emanuel’s words, when it comes to natural (and unnatural) disasters, it’s a numbers game. Don’t be deceived, to them it is a game… a power game which, if the average citizen listens to the pervasive narrative, one where the people are the losers emotionally, economically and intellectually.

Not a novel concept among ambitious politicians, stripping the electorate of self-determination is core to data collection methodology devised by subservient government employees who’ve been coddled to believe they’re in charge. To understand this scheme, it helps to comb through the statistics published by administrative agencies such as the CDC and Oregon Office of Emergency Management.

Intensity of the crisis was misrepresented and intentionally inflated by dishonest agencies and media

Watch the manipulation of statistics by the Center for Disease Control regarding the Covid-19 crisis (keep this in context) of death certificate guidelines the agency distributed to doctors pressuring them to attribute virtually any death to the virus. The totals that a couple weeks ago hovered at 200,000 fatalities in the United States were revised without fanfare to reveal the vast majority of deaths (94%) were resultant of co-morbidities and even included intentional poisonings and road accidents. Not to diminish the losses suffered by families whose members died from complications due to other serious health issues, but the plain, true statistics indicate that the intensity of the crisis was misrepresented and intentionally inflated by dishonest agencies and media. Purposefully overlooking the discrepancy, scare tactics continue in an effort to will the populace to continue self-induced isolation.

Now Western states are invoking the same practice in reporting evacuations from the fires raging across the region. Oregon OEM got caught red-handed bloating the number of families forced from their homes ahead of the advancing flames. The Oregonian/Oregon Live media group examined the statistics released by the office, finding them to be inexcusably overblown. Ignoring the correction, the vastly exaggerated number has been unquestioningly picked up by other press outlets.

The Portland-based news organization challenged state emergency management officials to revamp their estimates after comparing the total population in the Level 3 evacuation zones to the number of individuals being displaced. Instead of the 500,000 number initially stated that would amount to more than 10% of the total state population, Governor Kate Brown “on Friday afternoon clarified that only about 40,000 Oregonians had been evacuated.”

Presiding over the disaster-ridden state, Governor Brown appears content to mislead the public while turning a blind eye to witnessed incidents of arson and more than 100 days of rioting that’s reduced Oregon’s largest city to a war zone.

Governors of the West Coast states erroneously blamed climate change

In the face of burgeoning numbers of arrests of arsonists, most identified to be Antifa/BLM adherents, governors of the West Coast states erroneously blamed climate change for the devastating fires.

Sheriffs and other county officials are being compelled to refer to citizen reports of arson as “rumors.” In Clackamas County, Oregon, the sheriff and fire chief were shown the door after bringing attention to a rash of credible looting and arson reports in the cities of Estacada, Sandy and outlying evacuated areas. This post to Facebook includes a video of the county commission meeting during which the problem was discussed and the sheriff’s department broached the subject of bringing in the National Guard.

It has become general policy among government officials to sugarcoat, disregard or deny the realities of citizens having to police their own property to prevent arson and looting, reports of which law enforcement offices have been inundated and are being attributed to “conspiracy theories.” If 9-11 dispatchers are being flooded, it stands to reason that some of the calls have merit.

Which is it? Media ginning up fear that initiates the calls or real-time experiences and communications between neighbors keeping one another posted on actual events of catching miscreants in the act of trespassing?

The cover-up begins with city, county and state officials but the censorship is being promulgated by the majority of news media along with Facebook, Twitter and most every other social media outlet, not to forget so-called fact-checking sites.

A fear of freedom

Thus far, the cellular services haven’t been culling texts from private numbers but some email servers managed by giants like Google and Yahoo send out “false news” warnings with emails regularly, so don’t suppose those messages aren’t being monitored. Some recipients have later informed me that emails from my account have been flagged this way by these servers.

The saddest part of the one-sided government and media blitz is how pathetically frightened are ill-informed consumers who believe they have superior information. Personal encounters with individuals presumed to be reasonable have turned sideways as soon as the word “researched the data” entered the conversation. Automatic repetition of network news half-truths spilled from the individuals before hearing any statistical facts.

Numerous videos have been recorded of young people yelling to drown out a differing opinion, not caring what was said. It is quite another thing to have experienced a situation where the person—like one 30ish family man—backed away in utter fear, vehemently and with increasing emotion denying what he couldn’t even hear because he was talking over the other person’s words. The oddest thing was how he perceived a little woman to be such a threat that he ran to his front door and slammed it behind him.

What devil was chasing him? Certainly not the empty-handed woman who never came closer than 15 feet.

His mind had been invaded by horror instilled through a media of cultivated evil to the point that a civil conversation terrorized him, a full-grown man. What he exhibited is the basis of the angry hate that is consuming the BLM and Antifa rioters and arsonists… inculcated fear of information that doesn’t line up with what they believe. It’s a fear of being proven wrong because their pride won’t allow it.

In the end, it’s a fear of freedom and the prescription for losing it.

Corruption is Neither Left nor Right its the lust of Power!


QUESTION: The supporters of the left side and of the state/public sector always mention that the private sector is the one that suffers as in general (ex. 2008/2009 AIG case) the public always comes at the end as a fire brigade to save the world.

How would we answer technically to all these people?

Thank you.
SM

ANSWER: They should look at Russia. when everything collapsed, there were SECRET military installations where the upper-class politicians lived lavishly hidden from the public. The left is absolute fools to think for a split-second that the type of government makes a difference. The bailouts are part of the corruption. This is not even capitalism nor socialism — just raw corruption.

The bankers were encouraged by the Clintons to lend money so everyone could own a home. The bankers have long since abandoned relationship banking and moved to transactional banking which I have written about in-depth. Banks, once upon a time, made loans and retained those loans. There was a relationship between the borrower and the bank. The bankers got the Clinton’s to repeal Glass Steagall and Larry Summers and Robert Rubin, ex-Goldman Sachs, ushered in the new era. The bankers could make the loans and then package them and sell them off to investors. Because the bankers could care less about the quality of the mortgage, they just wrote whatever they could to sell to an unsuspecting market of investors.

You are convicted of certain misdemeanors and any felony within a period of ten years from the date of conviction, you lose your Series 7. Banks can be criminally prosecuted many times and the SEC always exempts them from any such restrictions they would impose on a registered person otherwise. The SEC is as corrupt as you could ever imagine. There is never any equal protection of the law because they never treat people the same.

New York City is notorious for charging any firm that competes against New York in New york. Drexel Burnham and Michael Milkin was a Philadelphia firm. They destroyed that firm with over 50,000 jobs and stole their junk bond business in New York. REFCO was the largest futures broker located in Chicago. They were charged in New York and destroyed. But M.F. Global actually blew up because ex-Goldman Sachs Corzine was using the client’s money to trade and lost. Corzine was never charged.

GlennIt was Martin Glenn who was the judge in New York on M.F. Global bankruptcy. He was the first one to engage in FORCED LOANS by abandoning the rule of law to help the bankers by protecting them from losses taking client accounts to cover M.F. Global’s losses. That is no different from what we saw in Cyprus. He simply allowed the confiscation of client funds when in fact the rule of law should have been that the bankers were responsible and M.F. Global’s losses should have been reversed. Never should the client’s funds be taken for M.F. Global’s losses to the NY Bankers. Judge Martin Glen placed the entire financial system at risk by trying to protect the bankers. He pampered these bankers by making them the new UNTOUCHABLES. We have to be concerned that there really is no rule of law that will protect you in a crisis when it comes to a New York institution.

This is plain corruption BECAUSE we do not have a real democracy where the people vote. Instead, our “representatives” are easily bribed by oligarchs who existed in Ancient Rome, Communist Russia, as well as the United States. Only a government that is subject to the vote of the people directly can hope to stand a chance against this type of corruption. Turning left or right NEVER eliminates corruption by oligarchs.

Overturning COVID restrictions and states of emergency


Memo to lawyers: What are you waiting for? File big cases now.

Jon Rappoport image

Re-Posted from the Canada free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesSeptember 16, 2020

Overturning COVID restrictions and states of emergency

I‘ve been covering the decision in the Pennsylvania COVID case and the court filing in Ohio.  They give us the templates for potential victories in other states and countries.

In Pennsylvania, a federal judge just ruled that Governor Wolf’s COVID containment measures are unconstitutional.  The judge went further.  NO emergency cancels the Constitution.  There is a line that cannot be crossed.  The right to assemble, to have freedom of movement, to earn a living—-they can’t be wiped off the board by lockdowns for ANY reason.

This is, indeed, a heroic ruling.  It affirms the unmistakable rays of light emanating from the basis of the American Republic.

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed)

In Tom Renz’s gigantic Ohio filing against Governor Mike DeWine, both the Constitution and issues of fact/science are asserted.  Facts mean something.  A declaration of emergency must undergo scrutiny, to determine whether a clear and present danger justifies the declaration.

Otherwise, a government can destroy the Constitution, the rule of law, and human rights by falsely claiming danger when there is none.  We would be back in the time of Royal Edict, with the king’s army as the “rationale.”

In 2020, lunatic cultural proclivities, media propaganda, political jockeying, pretensions of science, scare tactics, rigging of “facts,” and profit motives are in the mix.  They produce amnesia about basic principles.

The law, when correctly applied, refreshes memory and sweeps away a blizzard of claims and counter-claims.  The law comes to the point.

Using the law, one can say to governors and their public health advisors, “You’ve been going on for months now about the COVID spread and the emergency and the containment measures, but we want to reduce this to basics: do you have the Constitutional right to strip away our freedoms, and is there a factual reason to believe a state of emergency is necessary—-so we’re going to court.”

Or, putting it another way: “Sir, you’re holding a gun to my head while you’re explaining at length why I can’t move.  But you see, nothing has happened in court yet.  Meet my lawyer.  Are you going to shoot us both?  Is that where you really want to go?”

In Ohio, attorney Tom Renz, on behalf of his clients, and against the governor, is asking for a jury trial.  He wants citizens to hear the complex arguments about COVID SCIENCE.  He wants citizens to understand the con and the game that is being played, in great detail.  This is impressive.  Renz believes The People deserve to know and they are capable of understanding.

From my nearly 40 years working as a reporter, experience tells me attorney Renz is correct.  When the truth is laid out step by step, The People come to their senses.  They cut through their own malaise.  They cut through media indoctrination.  As if they once took a voyage to an island called Logic, they suddenly remember that voyage.

After all, the COVID lockdowns and the economic destruction are being visited on the population at large, so let a dozen of their members (OUR members) hear the case and adjudicate it.

I’m not naïve about courts and judges and lawyers and juries.  But I do know that, among the denizens of that system, there are keen minds and persons of good will.  Persons who know that the Law, as it was once enshrined by the Founders, is a beacon and a breakthrough.

It is a culmination, after centuries of struggle, which places freedom at the head of the table.

Freedom—-not edicts, not lockdowns.

What is COVID science?  Has the virus actually been defined?  Have case and death numbers been drastically inflated?  Is there a pandemic?  Why is a diagnostic test that has so many holes, that has never been properly validated, being deployed?  How many obfuscations has the CDC planted to hide official secrets?

Let’s go to court and turn on the lights and explore the rabbit hole.

(Links to the sources for this article can be found in this article posted on my blog.)

Seriously What Good are Laws?


Having taken an oath to defend the Constitution and who refuse to protect it from all attempts to destroy its meaning, are not declared to be working toward overthrowing the country, and placed under arrest

Tony Mangan image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesSeptember 16, 2020

 

Seriously What Good are Laws?

There are laws for everything, enough to fill volumes. Yet, lawless politicians ignore the laws that do not suit their plans of the moment and mentally create new temporary laws to support their needs. Laws like those are applied in rogue states, controlled by members of their progressive, socialist party. The new laws consider the existing legal laws irrelevant.

There are laws covering speed limits, there are others against “J walking,” climbing up the outside of public buildings, and I’m sure hundreds that I’ve never heard of, and all of those mentioned and many not mentioned, were put in place as public safety policies, so that no harm might come to the public.

There are Federal obligations that mandate the safety of all citizens so that they may prosper and enjoy freedom and the pursuit of happiness. The new progressive Socialist party develops their imaginary laws in order to control the citizenry. Laws that supposedly protect minority groups from “white supremacy” which they dub racist, homophobic, bigoted; basically everyone who is not in a minority category.  In order to supposedly protect minorities, these politicians, both federal and local, allow hordes of “peaceful” protesters to march into cities at night in areas of minority housing and businesses, while they keep the police at bay, and the “protesters” burn and loot those businesses, destroying decades of hard work. Minority-owned businesses changed the lives of the owners and brought work to the area and an improvement in the lives of residents and families, creating an upward trending lifestyle.

Pushed into poverty again, the elite progressives maintain control.

In spite of all the laws for the protection of the citizenry, rogue states declare themselves sanctuaries that harbor gangs of murderers, and anarchists who burn and loot cities, occupy public places as their own regardless of the citizens within those places put in jeopardy of the loss of life, goods, personal property and certainly the pursuit of happiness, as well as freedom to come and go as they please. Since the right to these things are all tenets of the Constitution of the United States of America, how is it that these states are not charged with rejection of the union, not only for putting U. S. citizen in danger but also thwarting the laws of the nation, preventing the sworn protection of all those invited or born to it to live under its protection.

How are these states and cities that do these things at the peril of Americans not guilty of attempting to overthrow our country from within? How is it that anyone employed by the government, having taken an oath to defend the Constitution and who refuse to pass laws that protect it from all attempts to destroy its meaning, are not declared to be working toward overthrowing the country, and placed under arrest without the benefits and rights of the position they held, while they languish in jail?

Legitimate peaceful protesters need to gather in front of the capitol with letters of request that the Attorney General of the United states convene a Grand Jury to look into these matters and begin the process of taking the rogue politicians, both federal and local into custody to determine how failure of keeping their oaths, laws, and their deceitful actions constitute crimes against the country and its citizens. They literally are aiding and abetting the criminal elements that are laying the anarchist groundwork on behalf of those who pay them those who determine which lives matter as opposed to our country’s belief that all lives matter solidified by the wars we have gotten involved in on behalf of the citizens of foreign countries who were becoming victims of governments with the same beliefs as the American socialist progressives.

 

Is A Cover Up over Clinton’s 2000 Interference in Russia’s elections still Going On?


QUESTION: Marty; You said that not even Fox News will report the story that the US interfered in the 2000 Russian election. Do you have any idea why?

EK

ANSWER: No not really. Perhaps it would admit things that the US government does not want to admit that even under the Clinton Administration which let the bankers do whatever they wanted from exempting student loans from bankruptcy to repealing Glass Stegall which enabled the bankers to see the mortgaged back security time bombs. I do not know. The movie Forecaster has been banned in the USA. Netflix wanted it but then the last minute the board said no. They seem to have gotten a phone call. Amazon will stream it but only outside the USA. Why?

Here is Hillary here in 2020 still claiming the Russians interfered when that has been totally been unsupported and the entire Steele dossier was paid for by Hillary. She then erased all her emails. A Trump victory will mean the Democrats will still claim only because of Russia when it was the Clintons who allowed the bankers to blackmail Yeltsin, forced him to step down, but he turned to Putin. Look at Bill’s expression. He trashed her book and that became public. Hillary will never admit people did not trust her. In her mind, it was Putin BECAUSE she stood by while the bankers tried to take over all the resources of Russia – gold, diamonds, and oil.

Safra, head of Republic National Bank, was assassinated by Russians (see Vanity Fair). But they tried to cover that up blaming his nurse, who was then released simply saying he never received a fair trial. The guy the bankers were trying to install as president was Berezovsky, which fled to Britain but later hanged himself.

So I have no idea why Fox News will not report this issue, especially when the Democrats are already claiming Trump can’t win without Russian interference. I do not know. It seems there is a coverup still in play.

Recently Released FISA Court Response to DOJ Reveals Direction of Durham Probe – DOJ Requested FISC Approvals…


A very interesting release by ODNI John Ratcliffe [LINK] highlights a June 25, 2020 response from the FISA court to the DOJ.  There are five issues queried by the DOJ seeking guidance from the FISC.  Each issue points to a specific path being taken by the DOJ in general… and the John Durham probe specifically.

Today, the ODNI, in consultation with the Department of Justice, releases a June 25, 2020, opinion by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) evaluating and approving limited circumstances under which the Government may temporarily retain, use, or disclose information that was unlawfully acquired pursuant to a FISC order. (more)

Important note:  We are looking at this in hindsight.  The response from the FISC was dated June 25, 2020, so the request for opinion from the court was before June 25th.

The court opinion tells us for the first time, the DOJ is admitting/stating that ALL FOUR of the Carter Page FISA applications were corrupt upon origination.   This is a big deal. In previous filing with the court (January 2020) DOJ only refuted the predication for the second and third renewal.

Within the FISC reply we see the DOJ stating all four submissions contained material omissions and violations of “the duty of candor” (ie. lying)  by the FBI investigative unit and the DOJ team that assembled the application(s).

As we look closely at the response we see some very specific language that tells a story.

 

Apparently the DOJ asked the FISA court for guidance on five very specific issues centering around the Carter Page FISA application.  The DOJ is asking for legal guidance to assist them in disclosing information in the FISA file & evidence attached to the FISA file.

The five issues all circle around the FBI/DOJ use of the Carter Page FISA application; and, more importantly, the underlying evidence that is attached to the FISA application.  The five topics are very interesting:

  1.  DOJ requests guidance for distribution of material due to FOIA demands.  FISC gives legal opinion.
  2.  DOJ requests guidance for distribution of material due to ongoing and anticipated civil litigation.  The FISC gives legal opinion and expands to criminal litigation.
  3.  DOJ requests guidance for distribution of material to internal investigative units from the FBI inspectors division (INSD).  FISC gives opinion and advice.
  4.  DOJ requests guidance for distribution of non-minimized information, and/or, minimized information as part of the ongoing Office of Inspector General oversight.  FISC gives opinion and guidance.
  5.  DOJ requests guidance for distribution of material to John Durham probe, both for criminal prosecution and possible evidence gathering attached to other ongoing investigative needs.  FISC gives opinion and guidance.

The opinion from the FISC is only 20 pages long [direct pdf here], and if you skip the citations it’s a pretty straight forward answer from Judge Boasberg to review.  I would strongly urge everyone to take a few minutes and read it… carefully…. to see what John Durham was asking.

Pages #6 and #7 talk specifically about the different requirements for retention and distribution and outlines a cautious approach toward distribution.  One of the disconcerting parts of this segment seems to be the FISA court subtly guiding the DOJ away from using non-minimized raw FISA material in prosecution of intentional malfeasance.   On this issue the court says allowing a target to escape prosecution is part of the penalty upon the DOJ for wrongful assembly.

The court does not consider the DOJ is targeting the “assemblers” for their criminal conduct.  Rather the response is general toward criminals who were targets of a FISA application assembled with corrupt intent. A little weird.

Pages #11 and #12 hit the topic of FOIA production.  The court says “some” FOIA requests might warrant document distribution, but not all.   However, on the topic of Carter Page getting his FOIA fulfilled, the court supports expansive distribution to Mr. Page.

I find the arguments and issues in/around page #14 to be especially noteworthy.  In this segment the court is responding to the underlying raw evidence that would normally be used to assemble a “woods file”.  The court notes the FBI Sentinel system would contain the minimized outcomes (redacted evidence) and this points to a bigger issue.  READ:

Note the woods file would be what is in the Sentinel system.  The government (Durham Probe) needs “access to the case file” beyond what is in the Sentinel system.  Durham wants to see the raw data, the underlying raw intelligence.

Why?

It looks like Durham investigators were already on the trail of the special counsel creating a Woods file…. and/or wants to see if the Steele Dossier is the original substantive documentation that underpins the Woods file.   Notice how INSD previously received “hard copies” of documentation that is presumed to be the Woods file.

Regardless of motive or investigative suspicion, someone wants to compare the raw intel to the intel that made it into the FBI/DOJ Sentinel system.

In response to this inquiry Judge Boasberg notes FBI investigators would have access to the minimized information within the Sentinel system; however, insofar as there was additional inquiry into the raw and non-minimized intelligence, a review and distribution would be permissible so long as there was a strong filter team in place to ensure statutes surrounding FISA security were not violated.

Overall, Boasberg gives permission and approval for all six aspects requested.  However, he does so with several legal qualifiers and distinctions which the DOJ must observe.

Here’s the full reply and opinion.  Strongly suggest the time to review:

.

 

Jim Jordan Discusses Senate Homeland Security Committee Effort to Subpoena Key “Spygate” Officials…


Ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, Jim Jordan, discusses the effort by Senator Ron Johnson to subpoena a list of key names from the ‘spygate’ scandal.

Additionally, Jordan discusses the effort by Adam Schiff to create another fake whistle-blower scandal this time using Brian Murphy from the Dept. of Homeland Security. Jordan clarifies some common misinformation.

 

Ric Grenell Explains “The Big Ugly” – Outsider Trump is an Existential Threat…


Former Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard “Ric” Grenell explained last night why DC hates President Donald Trump and the stakes in the 2020 election.  WATCH: 

 

Blazing Sunlight – Senate Intel Committee Refuses to Give GOP Senators Documents From Russia Investigation…


Of all the *tells* that have surfaced in the past four years, this is the biggest.  This is the one that reveals just how corrupt and duplicitous the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence really is.   Do not pass over this information without pausing and evaluating just how explosive this refusal is amid the largest, most corrupt scheme in political history.

The republican led Senate Intelligence Committee (SSCI) is refusing to provide documents to republican senators from their Russia investigation.  Citing archaic justification within senate parliamentary rules current Chairman Marco Rubio (R) and Vice-Chairman Mark Warner are refusing to allow Senator Johnson and Senator Grassley to review the evidence the SSCI assembled to create their report on Russian election interference.

The reason and motives for the denial are simple, yet the majority of Americans have no idea…. The SSCI was the legislative entity, both republicans and democrats, who participated in the unlawful effort to remove President Trump from office.  The risk of exposure is exactly why Mitch McConnell put Senator Marco Rubio on the committee as chairman to replace Richard Burr.  The Senate was participating in the soft-coup.

WASHINGTON DC –  The Republican and Democratic leaders on the Senate Intelligence Committee rejected a broad request from two Republican Senate leaders seeking access to the panel’s records to assist in their investigation into the Trump-Russia investigators.

Acting Chairman Marco Rubio of Florida and Vice Chairman Mark Warner of Virginia rejected a late August letter from Senate Homeland Security Chairman Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley of Iowa, who said that they “respect the authority” of the Senate Intelligence Committee to protect its interests, adding that “ultimately, we have the right as United States Senators” to access the records.

“We note that your request of the Committee is made pursuant to Senate Rule 26, but fails to account for the unique authorities and obligations invested in this Committee through Senate Resolution 400 and respected over decades of Senate and Committee practice,” Rubio and Warner responded. “Accordingly, we must reject the absolutist interpretation of Rule 26 that you propose. If this Committee elects to share materials that it has collected and generated in the course of its investigation into Russia’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election, it will do so pursuant to these long-standing Committee rules, and specifically, the joint agreement of the Chairman and the Vice Chairman.”

Rubio and Warner added: “Independent of whether that agreement is forthcoming, our position on this matter obviously does not preclude you from pursuing your own investigation, using your own authorities, as you see fit, within the confines of your committees’ jurisdictions.”  (read more)

I cannot overemphasize the importance of this sunlight avoidance enough.

Back on March 17, 2017, the SSCI secretly received the FISA application used on Carter Page from FBI supervisory special agent Brian Dugan.   The ‘review and return’ application was delivered to Senate Security Director James Wolfe, who then placed it in the senate scif to be reviewed by Vice-Chairman Mark Warner (and possibly Chairman Richard Burr).  It appears no other senators were informed of this production.

James Wolfe then leaked the FISA application to reporter Ali Watkins.  All indications are that Wolfe leaked the application to Watkins as directed by Warner, possibly with Burr’s full knowledge.

FBI Agent Brian Dugan then completed a nine-month leak investigation resulting in James Wolfe admitting to the leak.  The leak was Dugan’s FBI equity.  Due to the severity of the leak; and specifically because the leak encompassed the FISA application; in/around mid-January 2018 the special counsel in Main Justice was notified of Dugan’s findings and the investigative file was shared with the Weissmann team.

The Weissman team then took apart the investigative file and began running cover for the corrupt background story that included the participation by Senator Mark Warner.  Part of that file surfaced when the text messages between Warner and Chris Steele’s lawyer Adam Waldman were made public on Feb 9, 2018.

In a pre-planned operation, as soon as the explosive Warner/Waldman texts were released Senator Marco Rubio rushed to the microphones to fraudulently state that Warner had informed the committee during his early spring (2017) contacts with Waldman and Chris Steele.  This claim by Rubio was a lie.  Rubio was running cover for Warner as part of his own affiliation with the origin of the Fusion-GPS opposition research and the subsequent transfer of information to the Clinton campaign and ultimately through Chris Steele to the corrupt FBI investigative unit.  [Later to the Weissmann/Mueller crew]

Rubio’s motive to downplay the ramifications of the Warner effort, and the subsequent Wolfe leak, directly ties to his own involvement with the Fusion-GPS effort.   Remember, at the time of this obfuscation (late ’17 and early ’18) no-one yet knew the Fusion-GPS fraudulent story (which became the Steele dossier) was originally funded by the Super-PAC funding the Rubio campaign.

Go look at when the Weissmann/Mueller special counsel deleted their iPhone records and history.  The scrubbing took place mid-January 2018 as soon as they realized the previously unknown leak investigation by Washington Field Office FBI agent Brian Dugan had bumped into the special counsel operation that was coordinating with the SSCI.

The special counsel warned Warner; took action to remove specific evidence assembled by Dugan (which included the Warner/Waldman text messages); created a fictitious cover story for the SSCI to use; extracted the Dugan version of the FISA application he used to catch Wolfe (which they later released under the guise of FOIA); then sent a deconstructed (now useless) investigative file back to DC USAO Jessie Liu who had nothing left except to present a DC grand jury with James Wolfe lying to investigators.

That corrupt, unlawful and coordinated cover-up effort lies at the heart of why the SSCI will not share any information with GOP senators today.

Senators Johnson and Grassley were asking for the FISA application in 2018, not knowing the original and first renewal were previously provided to the SSCI on March 17, 2017.

When congress (House Intel, House Judiciary, Senate Judiciary and Senate Homeland Security) were writing to FISA Court presiding judge Rosemary Collyer seeking a copy of the FISA application from the court they had no idea one early copy was already provided to the Senate Intelligence Committee.  Chairman Burr and Vice-Chair Warner kept their review and use secret; but the information about their reception came out because James Wolfe leaked it and FBI agent Brian Dugan was awaiting that leak.

FISA Judge Rosemary Collyer never told any of the chairmen about the March 2017 copy of the application that was provided to Brian Dugan to deliver to the SSCI.

Throughout the attempt to remove President Trump from office, which included the impeachment effort, the SSCI was participating and assisting; now they are in cover-up mode.  That’s the reason why Mitch McConnell put Marco Rubio in charge of that committee.

There’s a reason why senior staff from Senator Ron Johnson’s committee and senior staff from Chuck Grassley’s committee are asking for SSCI documents.  It might not come out before the election, but it will come out…

BACKSTORY:  (Read Here – and All Citations)

The sequence is critical:

1.  Adam Waldman text messages. (release date Feb 9, 2018)

https://www.scribd.com/document/371101285/TEXTS-Mark-Warner-texted-with-Russian-oligarch-lobbyist-in-effort-to-contact-Christopher-Steele#

2. Justice Dept. Letter to journalist Ali Watkins (release date Feb 13, 2018)

http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4498451-Justice-Department-Records-Seizure.html

3.  James Wolfe indictment (release date June 8, 2018)

https://www.scribd.com/document/381310366/James-Wolfe-Indictment-Senate-Intelligence-Committee-Leaker#

4.  FISC / Senate Judiciary Letter (public release April, 2020 – event date July 12, 2018) The letter from DOJ-NSD (Mueller Special Proseuctors) to the FISC is important.

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/download/2018-doj-letter-to-fisc&download=1

5.  Carter Page FISA application (release date July 21, 2018)  Only need the first application section. 83 pages of original application.

https://www.scribd.com/document/384380664/2016-FISA-Application-on-Carter-Page#

6.  Government Sentencing Wolfe Case memo and recommendation for upward departure and/or variance. Filed December 11, 2018

https://www.scribd.com/document/395499292/James-Wolfe-DOJ-Sentencing-Memo-December-11

7.  Govt. Reply to Defendant (Wolfe) sentencing memo (date Dec 14, 2018)  Govt. Exhibit #13 (two page attestation is critical).

https://www.scribd.com/document/395775597/Wolfe-Case-DOJ-Response-to-Defense-Sentencing-Memo

Misc:

July 27, 2018,  – Wall Street Journal  – Wolfe lawyers threaten SSCI subpoenas.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/former-intelligence-committee-aides-lawyers-want-testimony-from-senators-1532692801?mod=e2tw

Dec 11, 2018 – Politico – Senators seek Leniency:

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/12/11/senate-intelligence-committee-leaking-james-wolfe-1059162

.