Wile the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists  (ICIJ) has clearly targeted Putin, in doing so when it is his aids rather than him personally calls into question what is their real political agenda. Icelandic Prime Minister Sigmundur David Gunnlaugsson resigned just 2 days after the papers were released. Reports say that 12 current or former heads of state are mentioned. Who are they protecting will be very interesting since targeting Putin makes this more of a political plot.

Nevertheless, this is coming precisely in line with the other side of 2015.75, which we warned would prove to be the peak in government. This is playing directly into the cycles where our model has been warning we are facing the collapse in confidence in government; i.e. politicians. This is truly the driving force behind Trump. But this massive leak may have far more political implications than merely targeting rich people who have a secret stash.

To what extent will this leak alter politics in an era of rising middle-class discontent and declining living standards as socialism collapses. This leak is more likely to fuel further anger among those who blame politicians and see the corruption boiling to the surface. The journalists are really closet socialists and have hoped that this will inspire the public to hand more control to government as a backlash against what they hoped to prove was the middle class is carrying a disproportionate share of the burden in supporting a system that seems to them unfair because the rich have more. They do not look at government and the corruption. Instead, they just want to blame the rich for having more than they do in traditional Marxist view of the world. They do not bother to ask why does government always have to raise taxes proving they cannot manage the economy. If someone managed your funds and lost whatever you gave them each month and then blamed the bankers so give them more to manage again, how many time will you keep giving them more money when they never produce a profit? The hedge funds and Wall Street own Hillary, yet they will never expose such connections and truly investigate her past. This illustrates that they too have a political agenda.

This revelation may actually backfire and produce far more political damage than just hunting the rich, which has been the ICIJ’s agenda. They may have contributed to the collapse of socialism and never understand the consequences of their actions.

Part of the crisis in the EU is the fact that there is an inherent anti-democratic foundation because Brussels has been attempting to force uniformity upon all of Europe which cannot possibly work. To the shock of some, I have stated many times that what made America function was DISCRIMINATION. Every group coming to America — German, Italian, French, or whatever — were forced to learn to speak English to get a job. This was not a law, but a cultural assimilation. If you ask an American what they are, they will respond with their ethnic background (half Irish and half German or whatever). You do not find such combinations in Europe beyond the rare encounter because language has kept European nations intact.

I ADDED THIS TO WHAT ARMSTRONG WROTE

YOU HAVE NO IDEA HOW IMPORTANT THIS IS; A FRENCH LAWYER AND POLITICAL PHILOSOPHER MONTESQUIEU, WHO LIVED DURING THE AGE OF ENLIGHTENMENT, PUBLISHED A BOOK TITLED “THE SPIRIT OF THE LAWS” IN 1748 IN WHICH HE STATED THAT THE FORM OF GOVERNMENT FOR A PEOPLE HAD TO BE IN TUNE WITH THE SENTIMENTS OF THE PEOPLE. 

MULTICULTURALISM CAN NOT WORK AND IT WILL DESTROY ANY COUNTRY THAT TRIES IT, THERE CAN ONLY BE ONE CULTURE IN A COUNTRY.

Consequently, the creation of a unified EU is unrealistic with language differences. From that basic fact emerges everything else. Since we have a single language in the USA, there is a national debate as to national security, etc. In Europe, there is no such debate. In fact, one could be criminally prosecuted for speaking an opinion against any other group. After a terrorist attack, they show people crying and lighting candles. The manhunt that resulted in finding the suspect, Salah Abdeslam, just 450 meters from where he officially lived demonstrates something that they will not express on TV: he cannot hide within the community without support from the community. The above photo showing locals gesturing angrily at the police who sealed off a Molenbeek neighborhood where Abdeslam was arrested is very disturbing for the implications suggest that Abdeslam had community support. Their language and cultural differences prevent many from assimilating within society. Any group that seeks to retain wholly distinct cultural differences cannot become part of a society. This really does not limit itself to Muslims, but any foreign group that resists becoming part of the country to which they moved. That would be as if I went to Rome, demanded everyone speak English, and then complained that they do not because that is where I moved. The old saying that stems from the migration in ancient times: “

Any group that seeks to retain wholly distinct cultural differences cannot become part of a society. This does not limit itself to Muslims, but any foreign group that resists becoming part of the country to which they moved. That would be as if I went to Rome, demanded everyone speak English, and then complained that they do not because that is where I moved. The old saying that stems from the migration in ancient times: “When in Rome, do as the Romans do.”

The fact that the EU member states retained their own cultures and languages simply means the idea of the EU cannot function. It should have remained as an economic union. Hollande explained that the purpose of the EU was to prevent another European war, but he completely misunderstands that an economy unites but a forced assimilation without a common language only highlights the differences. His policy on asylum was very clear on July 10, 2015. Everything the EU was supposed to promote has failed. The idea that a single federal government would provide economic prosperity has proven false, as is the fact that they would provide greater security together.