TRUMP SUPPORTERS TERRORIZED BY MOB


Only the Illegal Hispanics don’t like Trump and why would you expect them to like him he is going to send them home and build a wall so they can’t come back.

Governor Nikki Haley, Hillary Clinton, Glenn Beck, MSM, Brad Thor, Blame Trump Supporters For Violence…


The progressives have gotten away with the intimidation that they have used against Republicans for decades and so now that someone, Trump, is standing up against it they don’t know what to do and as long as they keep this up it will only hurt them and help Trump!

Whoops, San Jose Democrat Mayor Admits “The Ferguson Effect” is Real…


I would bet that ALL Hispanics that are in the country illegally do oppose Trump; but I also bet that those that came here legally do not all oppose Trump and that in fact a high percentage will vote for him.

Team ABC News Stunned At Violence Toward Donald Trump Supporters…


If you re in the USA and you are promoting secession that is treason and if you are a Mexican and here illegally you are a subject to being tried as a saboteur and either jailed or sent home.

Hunt for Taxes: Safe-Deposit Boxes Under Attack


HSBC

HSBC is altering its oversight of safe-deposit boxes in Hong Kong. Governments are targeting safe-deposit boxes to look for cash that is hiding from taxation. HSBC, a U.K. bank, is now moving against claimed financial crimes by altering conditions for safe-deposit boxes. This is becoming a global trend. Anything of value that is stored in a safe-deposit box is now considered money laundering. Governments want their taxes and all the laws are changing to ensure they get their money.

Who are “The People”?


We the People

The familiar phrase “We the People” no longer means what it used to. The majority of Americans do not understand how the law is made and assume Congress proposes all legislation and therefore makes law. That is not the case. The president can refuse to enforce any law or impose it arbitrarily under the claim of discretion, and the Judiciary is responsible for altering law every day. Judges create the majority of laws to impress their particular brand of bias in a very undemocratic manner by using their interpretation of the words written by Congress in any Act or the Constitution. So all you need is a judge to twist the words around to make new law, which is why fights erupt over appointing Supreme Court justices who can become legal unelected dictators.

Money laundering was intended for the war on drugs. Today, hiding your money from the government, which includes placing cash in a safe deposit facility, is money laundering thanks to judicial law. Judges twist the same statutes around so that the words mean whatever they want it to mean. It is your burden to appeal and prove that the judge is wrong. Good luck. Cops protect cops, and so do judges.

On March 18, 2008, the Supreme Court heard the case of District of Columbia v. Heller (07-290), regarding the Second Amendment, which reads:

“A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”

The ACLU argued in that the term “We the People” should have its definition changed to mean “We the State Militia.” Changing that definition can effectively prevent individuals from having the right to own a gun. The Constitution would become complete trash if the term was found to have different meanings, but lawyers have become wordsmiths and use this ability to create laws.

Jefferson-Sig

Supreme Court Cases

The Supreme Court overlooked this question of who “the people” are for 200 years (1789–1989). Since then, the Supreme Court has twice commented on the meaning of this phrase, but these two cases are in somewhat conflict with each other.

In United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, the court said that “the people” refers to those “persons who are part of a national community,” or who have “substantial connections” to the United States. In delivering this interpretation, they were consistent with the problem that faced the question of jurisdiction at the founding of the nation.

If you were English and committed a crime in France, the French king could not punish you for you were the property or “subject” of the English king. He would send you back in chains to England with an explanation of what you did. Since the American Revolution was against the monarchy, why would they comply with international law and send someone back to England for a crime committed in America to be punished by a king they did not recognize? The American Constitution established territorial jurisdiction for the first time. So someone convicted of a crime would be punished in America for his crime in America. Now the problem became a question of rights under the Constitution. Did a foreign citizen have a right to a fair trial? The definition had to extend to any person tried in America regardless of their citizenship.

The touchstone in United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez was correct, constitutionally speaking, for it extended to one’s connection to this country in compliance with territorial jurisdiction. The court declared that this definition of “the people” applied consistently throughout the Bill of Rights and did not limit rights to citizens.

In U.S. v. Verdugo-Urquidez (494 U.S. 247, 288, 1990), Justice William J. Brennan Jr. argued: “The term ‘the people’ is better understood as a rhetorical counterpoint ‘to the government’ … that rights that were reserved to ‘the people’ were to protect all those subject to ‘the government.’ …” He continued: “The Bill of Rights did not purport to ‘create’ rights. Rather, they designed the Bill of Rights to prohibit our government from infringing rights and liberties presumed to be pre-existing.”

In United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, the Supreme Court wrote: “The people protected by the Fourth Amendment, and by the First and Second Amendments, and to whom rights and powers are reserved in the Ninth and Tenth Amendments, refers to a class of persons who are part of a national community… The Fourth Amendment’s drafting history shows that its purpose was to protect the people of the United States against arbitrary action by their own government.”

However, in District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), the court approvingly quoted Verdugo-Urquidez’s definition and similarly suggested that the term “the people” had a consistent meaning throughout the Constitution. This must be correct or the Constitution becomes chaotic. Yet, Heller also said that the term “refers to all members of the political community,” which actually changes the definition.

Heller’s interpretation contains a confusing three-part analysis: (1) it approved of Verdugo-Urquidez’s interpretation; (2) it substituted “members of the political community” for “persons who are part of a national community”; and (3) it suggested that “the people” means the same thing throughout the Constitution.

Heller’s analysis has created a conflict that has largely gone unnoticed but is already changing law. Heller could now be u as changing the meaning of “the people” throughout the Bill of Rights by limiting “the people” to “members of the political community,” which might be interpreted to mean, inter alia, “eligible voters.” This interpretation could have a profound consequence for individuals who have been denied the right to vote and non-American citizens. In this manner, the entire principle of territorial jurisdiction can be overturned.

Heller’s interpretation is already being applied. The Fifth Circuit previously held, “Once aliens become subject to liability under United States law, they also have the right to benefit from [Fourth Amendment] protection.” (United States v. Cortes, 588 F.2d 106, 110 (5th Cir. 1979) (citing United States v. Cadena, 585 F.2d 1252, 1262 (5th Cir. 1978))

In a recent case, US v Armando Portillo-Munoz, it was ruled that a ranch hand who lived and worked in the United States for more than 18 months, paid rent, and helped to support a family, but who committed the misdemeanor of illegally crossing the border — is not part of “the people.”  Circuit Judge Dennis in his dissenting opinion warned, “The majority’s interpretation of the “the people” has far-reaching consequences.”

“We the People” no longer means what people have always assumed: “We the People.”

The Numbers


Reversals Timing

QUESTION: Marty; your numbers are just incredible. Your number 17800 I thought would be elected. The Dow was above it and looked like it was preparing to take off. To watch this market fall back yet close just below it is amazing. Regardless of the market, it will always gravitate toward your numbers like magnets or some compelling invisible force. Since we avoided the buy signal in the Dow for the month, what now?

ANSWER: I understand that many people hate my guts because the numbers are the numbers. I have even had to endure allegations of manipulating the world economy because of the accuracy of these Reversal numbers. These same people refuse to accept the possibility that markets are just not random and are extremely precise in their movement. That means they cannot be manipulated long-term changing their trend nor can government proclaim vote for so-and-so and he will change everything. That is what we are really talking about here. It is much deeper than simply failed to close above 17800 in the Dow. The implications are highly profound. This is why Brussels will collapse as well and why Western Civilization will lose the crown of the Financial Capital of the world. The more they fight the trend, the bigger the fall. Japan promised to support the NIKKEI when it began to crash. People held looking to government to save them. We ended up having to bailout almost 300 major companies in Japan because of their wrongly placed faith in government as so many do today. Nothing can be manipulated to save society or to compel its destruction. That is what our Reversal System has proven for decades.

The next big turning point in the Dow will be September. We will put out a special report because this is becoming very interesting and extremely important.

Bankers Forced out of Metals?


Manipulation-2

QUESTION: Mr. Armstrong; I have been trapped by these gold promoters and they indeed are like used car salesmen, worse since they are not regulated. I listened how they were wrong because the bankers were suppressing gold. If the bankers were eliminated, gold would soar to anything like $25,000 to $100,000. Well, the bankers have all been skewered. Here in Canada, Bank of Nova Scotia is one of the five banks accused in manipulating metals. One would think if the bankers were really preventing the metals from rallying, then why are they collapsing? I suspect you are the only person telling the truth here. Can you explain the real story?

Thank you

PH

ANSWER: Bankers have always fun-run their clients. It is way too tempting to do so when you make the market and you can see the client positions. The big traders are starting to wise up. They are a bit slow. You have to excuse them. Perhaps they were in the special-ed classes growing up. They trusted the big names and are starting to experience being screwed big time. The total gold bullion trade has averaged 4,000 tons annually for the past 10 years. One metric ton equals 32,150.7466 troy ounces. So we are talking about 128,600,000 ounces per year. The US Mint sells about 425,000 one ounce coins. This tend to put the bullion coins in perspective.

About two-thirds is new mine production and one-third is recycled gold according to the World Gold Council. Jewelry accounts for about 50% of gold sales. About 9% of gold production is used in technology. Central Bank demand has fluctuated from 2% to 14% annually of total production. Including ETFs, investment demand accounts for about 33% of world production. This means you have a fresh supply every year of 128,600,000 ounces coming to the market. This is not all “investment”. If the retail trade in the economy slows, jewelry sales decline. That is the bulk of gold but the promoters want to make you think gold is suppressed solely by the bankers for nefarious reasons. There are other factors taking place. This is not all “investment” consumption.
93SilverBuffett-WThis type of “manipulation” pushing the fix one way or the other to elect stops has been like growing money on trees. This BY NO MEANS suppresses gold or any currency, no less any other commodity that they have played games with. All the big manipulations have ALWAYS been to the UPSIDE, not to the downside. It is absurd to pretend that gold is suppressed perpetually so they can make money in some strange way. Both of the Buffet entries into silver were to push it up. Even GATA knew that was the game in silver back then. Did they tell everyone it was PhiBro & Buffet? Why not?

SilverManipulationThe bankers get it going from $3 to $7 and and then the promoters talk it up and the retail come in to buy the high every time and they turn around and sell it to them. That is how they make real money. Suppressing gold to keep in down with no volume means no profit. Even the manipulation of Platinum was the the UPSIDE.

Now that the bankers are being forced out of the game, gold was actually being supported by them. They were keeping the hope of a rally alive. Without the bankers, the support will be less and we can see gold fall out of bed. It has fallen to $1201 by 5PM on May 30th. The next support does not come into play until 1170.

Every market has its time and place. The promoters hate my guts because they always want to make a profit getting people to buy. They could care less about the advice they are giving. The market is always right. People are wrong. We can define the levels and the time. Just let the market do its thing.

India Joining Cashless Society – Pulling the Plug on Govt.


Pulling Plug Gov

COMMENT: it is just chaos by politicians destroying the future. cashless society …how did u see this just amazing.I never thought it is coming to india as indians believed in hard MONEY sir.
thank you for your knowledge i think in future u should create an AI to help the people show the path. Coz there is no other way to see this except CYCLES.

We end up making same mistake over and over again.
G20 Photo

Prime Minister Narendra ModiREPLY: All governments talk. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is now saying that a cashless society will end black money. He is on par with the rest of the political world. The prospect of a cashless society was discussed at the last G20 meeting. They want to eliminate cash worldwide and shut down tax havens. When you have actually worked behind the curtain, you come to realize how things really work. Those who make up conspiracy theories are usually biased. For decades, I have been told in meetings with many governments around the world that IF PEOPLE PAID THEIR TAXES THEY WOULD HAVE NO PROBLEM RUNNING SOCIETY. This has been told to be so many times; it is the prayer they say at the foot of their bed before they go to sleep every night.

There really is nothing new from what they are doing now and the fall of the Roman Empire. The human emotions are the same. This is the ONLY reason I am doing what I am doing. If I acted only for myself, I would run to an island and trade from the beach. But I realize that government is like water in a bathtub. There will be no place to hide. History teaches us that. So the question becomes, how fast will this be over? I follow our models. Once the plug is pulled, everything will go down the drain very rapidly. We spend tens of millions of dollars recreating the world monetary system to answer the question: how fast do governments die?

Roman decline silver content monetary system - Armstrong Waterfall effect

Look at this chart of the fall of the Roman monetary system. The Persians captured Valerian I in 260 AD. His son Gallienus took over and the economy went into a massive wave of deflation after the people came to the realization that they were vulnerable and began to hoard money. As people hoard, as they are doing right now on a personal, corporate, and bank level (see Fed excess reserves), the economy turns down and that results in less tax revenue. Before, they debased the money for that was the means to increase the money supply to meet expenses. The bottom in the debasement unfolded in 268 AD. So while Rome lasted over 1,000 years, its monetary system collapsed in just 8.6 years. That was without internet, radio, or TV for communication.

Fed Excess Reserves

Those in power really do see us as the great unwashed who are clueless and hopeless without them. They fight against the invisible hand all the time, and they want to rule the world. I have met with many heads of state over the years. They all know about our computer. They always seem to want to know what it is saying. It is not that they follow it, but rather they call to keep an ear to the ground to see who is winning this eternal contest between the rulers and the great unwashed.

When Bronze is Worth More than Gold and Silver


Caesarea-Israel shipwreck-coins

Constantine Licinius Follis - RAn ancient Roman shipwreck has been discovered in the port of ancient Caesarea, located in Israel. The ship was full of bronze statues and coins that were destined to be melted down. The coins are from Constantine (309-337AD) and Licinius (308-324 AD). The typical bronze Follis of this period weighed 6.5 grams on average. By the end of the century, bronze coins were reduced to under 2 grams.
DecFollis295-348ADShipwrecks like this are rare and typically the main source of bronze objects since most would have been melted down. The Vandals sacked Rome, and, to this day, we retain the word “vandalize” because they ripped the copper off the roofs of every temple. Even bronze went through cycles of abundance and periods of scarcity. There is a cycle to everything.

Merovingian Pseudo-Imperial (AU Tremissis)There was an attempt to restore the bronze coinage under Constans in 348 AD, and again under Julian II in 362 AD. As the empire began to spiral down, the coinage became gold and silver. Bronze was hoarded because it had a utilitarian value and could be recast into weapons or tools. The 4th century finds bronze all but vanish and gold becomes the common means of a medium of exchange until the empire collapses altogether in 476AD.
Even after the fall of Rome, we find the coinage is virtually only gold. The Merovingian coinage is gold, and the same is true in the Celtic coinage. This eventually gives way and gold vanished for 600 years. The Dark Age produced some coinage, but they are rarely found more than 20 miles from where they were struck, which confirms the lack of trade. The coinage simply became silver.

AngloSaxon-Debasement

offa-silverPenniesWe can even see the debasement of gold being replaced with silver in the coinage of the Anglo-Saxons. The silver denarius of Rome was revived and became the silver penny in Britain. Offa (757-796 AD) even issued coins with his wife’s portrait. This is a direct restoration of the Roman monetary system that always issued coins showing the first lady so to speak.

DBLEDIEIt is this restoration of the Roman denarius which continues to the present time. Indeed, the penny in your pocket is, in fact, the direct link to the Roman coinage that is alive today until we move to electronic money.