The Facts on Andrew Cuomo’s Nursing Home Policy


Re-Posted from JUST THE FACTS By Anna Lynn and James Agresti
October 29, 2020

Wednesday morning on ABC’s The View, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo gave a factually misleading explanation for the thousands of people who died with Covid-19 in NY nursing homes.

After co-host Sunny Hostin praised Cuomo’s book Leadership Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic as “absolutely fantastic,” she said to the governor:

There has been a lot of confusion about an alleged March 25th order that directed nursing homes to accept in New York, infected Covid patients, possibly leading to the death of more than 6,000 seniors. Now you say in your book that that was a lie—that New York state never demanded or directed that any nursing home accept a Covid-positive patient. The Department of Justice however is now supposedly looking into this issue. Can you explain what really happened?

Cuomo replied:

Yea, what a shock that the Department of Injustice sends a letter a few days before an election trying to advance a political theory. I was shocked and amazed that the Trump administration was capable of such a thing. Sunny, they have played politics on this from day one, right? They have done a terrible job on Covid from day one, and they want a counter-defense, and what they were saying was, “Well, a lot of people died in nursing homes in Democratic states. It’s not just New York, it’s all the Democratic states.”

The truth is a lot of people did die in nursing homes in Democratic states. The truth is people are dying today in nursing homes in Republican states. It’s just that Democratic states had the disease worse and earlier, and older people are more vulnerable to Covid, right? We were introduced to Covid in the state of Washington in a nursing home.

If you look at how many people died in New York nursing homes, New York is number 46 out of 50 states in the percentage of deaths in nursing homes. The way the law works is no nursing home in New York can accept a patient if they don’t believe they can care for that patient adequately, and if they can do it within the safety of their facility.

So the conspiracy they’re trying to spread just has no factual basis. But yes, people in nursing homes died, and they’re playing politics with the issue, which I think is especially cruel because people who lost loved ones in a nursing home, they’re dealing with it, and now they also have to deal with the confusion or the pain of maybe government did this.

Hostin’s choice of words and Cuomo’s entire statement are incompatible with the facts of this matter. The Cuomo administration’s March 25th order is not “alleged” but a fact. This order explicitly states:

No resident shall be denied re-admission or admission to the NH [nursing home] solely based on a confirmed or suspected diagnosis of COVID-19. NHs are prohibited from requiring a hospitalized resident who is determined medically stable to be tested for COVID-19 prior to admission or readmission.

That mandate was at direct odds with two key scientific facts about C-19 that were widely known since the outset of the pandemic:

  1. Elderly people and those with chronic ailments—who are the very definition of nursing home residents—are extremely vulnerable to the virus.
  2. The virus is highly transmissible, and thus, it can easily sweep through large groups of sickly and/or aged people who live together.

Including an estimated 18 days between infection and death, over 5,900 nursing home patients in NY were lost by the time Cuomo rescinded this policy. The fact that Cuomo repealed this mandate belies his claim that it did no harm.

Furthermore, Cuomo’s statistics on NY nursing home deaths are greatly understated because his Department of Health excluded people who caught the disease in a nursing home but died “outside of the facility.” Thus, Cuomo’s “official” figure may undercount the real one by thousands of deaths.

While rejecting calls for an independent investigation, Cuomo has repeatedly blamed others for the nursing home carnage in his state, but none of his explanations hold water:

  • Cuomo first faulted nursing homes, stating that they were only required to readmit C-19 patients “if they have the ability to provide the adequate level of care.” However, Cuomo’s order:
    • unequivocally states in underlined text, “No resident shall be denied re-admission or admission to the NH [nursing home] solely based on a confirmed or suspected diagnosis of COVID-19.”
    • often made it impossible for homes to know if they could provide appropriate care by banning them from “requiring a hospitalized resident who is determined medically stable to be tested for COVID-19 prior to admission or readmission.”
    • never mentioned or implied that it is illegal under NY State law for nursing homes to accept someone they cannot care for properly.
  • Cuomo then claimed that his order “followed President Trump’s CDC guidance,” but the truth is that this guidance:
    • doesn’t recommend putting C-19 patients into nursing homes.
    • states that C-19 patients “should go to a facility with adequate personal protective equipment supplies and an ability to adhere to infection prevention….”
  • Cuomo’s top aide, Melissa DeRosa later said that his policy was “in-line directly” with directives from the Trump administration’s Centers For Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), but to the contrary:
    • 12 days before Cuomo’s order, CMS warned that homes must be “vigilant in identifying any possible infected individuals” and “follow CDC guidance.”
    • CMS administrator Seema Verma directly responded to DeRosa’s claims, stating that the CMS was “clear and unmistakable” in stating that nursing homes should reject people that they cannot care for, and “any insinuation to the contrary is woefully mistaken at best and dishonest at worst.”
  • After that, Cuomo claimed that NY “had more people die” because the Trump administration “missed the boat and never told us that this virus was coming from Europe and not from China.” In reality, the Trump administration issued a near-total ban on travel from Europe on the same day that the World Health Organization declared C-19 a pandemic (March 11). Yet, Cuomo did not announce a stay-at-home order until more than a week later on March 20.
  • Finally, Cuomo’s Department of Health published a report that returned to blaming nursing homes while claiming that his policy was not a “significant factor” in fatalities. However, the report:
    • misinterprets association as causation by arguing that a “link between the timing of staff infection and nursing home fatalities” proves the nursing home staff transmitted the virus to residents.
    • uses a false measure of timing based on the number of homes with an infected staff member instead of the actual number of infected staff members.
    • uses grossly incomplete data that excludes residents who caught the virus in nursing homes but died “outside of the facility,” a figure that could number in the thousands.

So in the face of proven scientific facts and crystal clear guidance from federal health agencies, Cuomo forced C-19 carriers into the vicinity of the people who are most vulnerable to the virus.

Cuomo and his surrogates then used a series of falsehoods to cast blame for his policy on others. Now, he is impugning people who would hold him accountable for his actions.Share the Data

My Prediction on the 2020 Election


A MAGA Win if no interference!

The Great Red Wave Rising


What Blue Wave?

Have you noticed how loud and shrill Fake News has become in these last days before the election? The polls are screaming Biden ahead, Trump way behind. The polls were wrong in 2016 and are wrong in 2020.  We have a new factor, the “shy” Trump voter thrown into the mix. Shy Trump voters won’t talk to pollsters and when they do, they tell the pollsters that they are voting Biden. When you see what the left has done to Trump supporters, harassment and physical violence, you can understand why the Shy Trump voter holds his cards close.

So it comes down to this: who are you gonna believe? The Fake News and rigged pollsters, or your lying eyes?

What my “lying” eyes see are huge Trump crowds at Trump’s rallies, er “peaceful protests.”  People lining up for hours and even days before the rally starts, crowds lining the roads to just get a glimpse of the President when he drives by. Boat parades, car parades, even Amish buggy Trump support parades. The most recent Trump car caravan stretched over 6 miles!

America loves the President and the President loves America!

Compare that to the ‘enthusiasm” for the Biden campaign.  You know Joe’s in trouble when they  drag out Obama, who spoke to about 100 cars at his event. Obama, the poster boy for the Democrats, can’t even draw more than a hundred people now. Biden has spoken to “crowds” of 12.  Their excuse? “We don’t want these to be super spreader events!” Yeah, right.

Meanwhile, consecutive nights of rioting are happening in Philadelphia.

Mobs vs. Jobs.

Law and order vs lawlessness.

America First vs. China First.

The American people know, they want their country back. They know the Democrats are no longer the party of JFK, but the party of Mao and Stalin, radical America hating communists who want to control every aspect of your lives.

And so the Great Red Wave of 2020 rises….

Please vote for President Trump, vote like your life depends on it. Vote like your children’s lives depends on it…vote like your grandchildren’s lives depends on it….because they do.

VOTE MAGA VOTE TO SAVE AMERICA!

Tina

Happy Birthday Hill, ACB Confirmed


A Special Gift to Hillary

Hillary Clinton probably didn’t have much of a happy birthday considering how she had to share her special day with the momentous event of Amy Coney Barrett getting sworn in to the Supreme Court. 

There has been a lot of hateful lava spewing from Hillary’s volcanic head lately. The twice-failed presidential candidate seems to be in a very sour mood. She explained how it made her literally “sick to her stomach” to think that she’d have to endure four more years of Trump’s “abuse and destruction of our institutions, and damaging of our norms and our values, and lessening of our leadership.” She also went on to say that most Republicans are “cowards, spineless enablers” of Donald Trump.

Which institutions are getting destroyed? Well, we know the FBI has already been destroyed by partisan Democrat and Deep State operatives. Everything the FBI now does seems designed to protect swamp monsters such as Hillary Clinton. Norms and values? Hillary values the further lining her pockets with ‘pay to play.’ Such criminal behavior is normal to her. Hillary values her own power she’s mad that her leadership was ‘lessened.’ She needs it lessened still further by getting locked up. 

Justice Barrett is at polar opposites with the abortion-loving Hillary Clinton. A baby, moments from birth, can still be aborted according to Hillary because legally it’s not a human being. Barrett loves the Constitution and is a strong woman of real values including justice and the protection of individual rights. Hillary had her cake and ate it too. She also wanted to control the cakes of everyone else.

Sick to her stomach Hillary will gulp down more antacids should voters ‘enable’ Trump to win a second term. The hate in Hillary’s heart beats strong, but the love within Amy Coney Barrett is stronger.

—The GrrrTeam

The Most Corrupt Election – People Were told they Already Voted?


Armstrong Economics Blog/Corruption Re-Posted Oct 29, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

The Most Corrupt Election in History – FBI/CIA Protecting Biden?


Armstrong Economics Blog/Corruption Re-Posted Oct 29, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

Jack Dorsey of Twitter should be Brought to Justice & Imprisoned


Armstrong Economics Blog/Rule of Law Re-Posted Oct 29, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey should be Imprisoned for violating the Civil Rights under 18 USC 241 of the American People and Congress cannot by Section 230 grant him any immunity whatsoever that undermines the Constitution

The Supreme Court long ago recognized that the right to vote for federal offices is among the rights secured by Article I, Sections 2 and 4, of the Constitution, and hence is protected by Section 241. United States v. Classic, 313 U.S. 299 (1941); Ex parte Yarbrough, 110 U.S. 651 (1884).

Therefore, Section 230 cannot overrule a constitutional right. The Supreme Court held “We have rejected the view that the applicability of one constitutional amendment pre-empts the guarantees of another.” US v James Daniel Good, 510 US 43 (1993) see also Soldal v Cook County, 506 US 56 (1992).

Therefore, Section 230 CANNOT repeal the civil rights statute. They need to be brought to court and this power needs to be stripped from them as unconstitutional. Let the jury take their billions and redistribute it to all Americans fulfilling their Socialist dreams.

It is time for lawyers to bring a class-action lawsuit against Dorsey and Twitter.

Tucker Carlson: Bobulinski Documents Intercepted and Removed From Overnight Package….


Posted originally on The Conservative Tree House on October 28, 2020 by sundance

Tucker Carlson revealed this evening that someone intercepted an envelope containing documents of evidence supporting the claims by Tony Bobulinski.  The documents were mailed by a “well known overnight transport” company and mysteriously were removed in transit from New York to LA.  I have a hunch what happened…. but first, WATCH:

I review this story from a position that I cannot fully explain. However, I have personal experience -recent experience- with a similar and rather unusual situation that cannot be explained by any method other than DHS surveillance. So here’s what I think took place.

The package, likely a Fed-X delivery, was intercepted by FBI agents using mechanisms for tracking and surveillance that open targeting through portals connected to DHS.

As an outcome of the U.S. Patriot Act, the U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security has an agreement in place with mail shipping companies, public/private services, that essentially allows them a portal to track all in-state and interstate mail deliveries.

The FBI has access to this data network in the same way the FBI has access to federal transportation records. Just like when you book a flight and DHS portals are open that allow FBI to track your movements domestically. This type of portal is also accessed in private company transportation like Uber, Lyft etc. DHS, and as a consequence the FBI, can easily track your whereabouts.

Without much hesitation I will bet the FBI was monitoring the communication of Bobulinski, and by extension the entire Tucker Carlson production network. Once the shipment was known to be taking place, the DHS portals are opened; the package is tracked; and the FBI moves in to intercept the delivery.

The transport company doesn’t need to be participating because they are essentially unneeded. Their system network is connected to the FBI.

That’s the likely scenario.

Wanna bet?

Another Lie Exposed – Anonymous Source for NYT Op-Ed Revealed as Low Level Policy Advisor for Dept. of Homeland Security…


Posted originally on The Conservative Tree House on October 28, 2020 by sundance

The New York Times constantly claimed the anonymous source for their op-ed against the Trump administration was a “high level administration official.”  However, today the actual person behind the “anonymous” claim is now revealed.

Miles Taylor was a low level policy advisor within the Department of Homeland Security when he wrote the op-ed for The NY Times; he later became spokesman for DHS under Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen.  A DHS “policy advisor” is a long way from a “Senior Administration Official…. and even the far-left loons are now left rolling their eyes at the revelation.

The Anonymous op-ed, and the resistance claims constructed therein by the newspaper, was a complete snow-job by the New York Times in an effort to intentionally frame a false narrative against the Trump administration.

Knowing the truth of their false presentation is now stark and admitted, what does that say about all of the New York Times reporting using anonymous sources?

Taylor wasn’t even “chief of staff”, he was a simple policy adviser.

President Trump Spotlights The Corrupt Influence of “Big Tech” in 2020 Election…


Posted originally on The conservative Tree House on October 28, 2020 by sundance

In a direct, forceful and brutally honest way President Trump points out how Big Tech: Google, Facebook and Twitter, are attempting to interfere in the U.S. presidential election.https://www.youtube.com/embed/eoMMyXE1b7s?version=3&rel=1&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&fs=1&hl=en&autohide=2&wmode=transparent

Reclaim our liberty:

“This is not simply another 4-year election. This is a crossroads in the history of our civilization that will determine whether or not We The People reclaim control over our government.”

… “This is a struggle for the survival of our nation. This election will determine whether we are a free nation, or whether we have only the illusion of Democracy but are in fact controlled by a small handful of global special interests rigging the system.”

… “I take all of these slings and arrows for you. I take them for our movement, so that we can have our country back. Our great civilization, here in America and across the civilized world, has come upon a moment of reckoning.”

~President Donald J Trump

Share this: