President Trump Confirms Selection of Representative Mike Waltz as National Security Advisor


Posted originally on the CTH on November 12, 2024 | Sundance 

President Trump has confirmed his intention to use Florida Rep (Daytona) Mike Waltz as National Security Advisor.

[Source]

Mike Waltz serves on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI).

In the role of Nat Sec Advisor, Waltz would presumably represent the power of the president toward every element of the National Security apparatus and Intelligence Community.

The Nat Sec Advisor is a very powerful position, if used correctly.  The absolute power of the President toward the intelligence community in the executive branch is carried by the Nat Sec Advisor (NSA).  The NSA has the ability to reach into every silo and control every element of every decision therein.

The NSA organizes the finding memos which authorize all covert intelligence operations globally and domestically.  The NSA can shut down bad things in the IC, cancel black-op operations, and essentially hold omnipotent power within the executive branch over every aspect of the 17 intelligence agencies who operate therein.  The NSA can also determine what is, and what is not, a national security matter.

Mike Waltz comes from inside the IC machinery and there is a lot more to be concerned about than there is to be optimistic about.

Waltz has publicly said, engaged with, and acted upon, National Security Information (NSI) products, intelligence information, that is demonstrably false and fraudulent.

Perhaps Waltz has changed his disposition, but I see no immediate indications.

Like many others, heck, almost all others, Mike Waltz believes the IC system is inherently good, just under the control of bad actors. There are volumes of direct and specific evidence that this is not the correct perspective.  The IC system is corrupt by design, the mandates and interpreted policies that formulate the mission statements of the bureaucrats within it are the problem, not just the corrupt officials carrying out the mission.

It is almost impossible to understand the scale of the corruption within the IC from a position inside the silos under the control of the IC, the “six ways to Sunday” group.  It is only when you exit those silos and engage with the world that is not under the control of the IC that you fully grasp just how fraudulent the constructs are.

The IC use the system to manipulate the Office of the President, the House and Senate intelligence committees, and the aggregate direction of all agency silos under their control.  Big Tech is a downstream beneficiary, both in finance and operational business model, from the Intelligence Community, that’s how and why the IC can control social media.

Those entities who operate within the current system of technocracy are dependent on the allowances of their benefactors.  This presents a very challenging problem to overcome.

None of what you have just read is fathomable to anyone inside the silos created by the IC, including Mike Waltz.

Those who exit the silo structure, and then contemplate the reality of new information from outside the world of the IC, suddenly realize just how their thinking was manipulated by the people who operate the control systems in the silos.  It’s akin to an abusive relationship, where the abused only realize the scope of how much they were manipulated long after they finally break free.  I have watched it happen.

Here’s the announcement:

Sean Hannity will be thrilled and will deploy ‘glowing’ reviews.

We REALLY need to watch the White House Counsel selection closely now.

FUBAR!

Natalie Winters BLASTS Weak Senate Republicans In Fight Against Recess Appointments


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Nov 11, 2024 at 8:00 pm EST

Julie Kelly: “We’re Not Gonna Let What Happened In Jack Smith’s Office Go Without Consequence”


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Nov 11, 2024 at 8:00 pm EST

Erik Prince Breaks Down The Importance Of President Trump’s Potential Recess Appointments


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Nov 11, 2024 at 8:00 pm EST

Erik Prince Gives A Preview Of His Upcoming Meeting With Senate Freshmen


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Nov 11, 2024 at 7:30 pm EST

Bannon: “President Trump Is Trying To Institutionalize His Political Revolution”


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Nov 11, 2024 at 7:30 pm EST

Mike Davis: “Senate Republicans Can’t Be In The Way Of Trump Like They Were In 2017”


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Nov 11, 2024 at 7:30 pm EST

Navarro: Senate Republicans Must Promise Trump A Recess And Open Ballot For Speaker


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Nov 11, 2024 at 7:30 pm EST

Why Bitcoin Will NOT Replace the Dollar


Posted originally on Nov 12, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

Bitcoins

People continue to ask if Bitcoin will replace the dollar. They believe that the recent surge in Bitcoin indicates that it will topple the USD as the world’s reserve currency, but that is merely propaganda. You must understand that Bitcoin is simply a trading vehicle, not a currency. I cannot stress that point enough. My opinion has been unpopular, and clients have walked away due to my stance on crypto. That’s fine, as I am not in this for the money. I can only adequately inform my clients of the unbiased truth and hope that those willing to listen will heed the computer’s warnings.

To begin with, there is much speculation about the founder(s) — Satoshi Nakamoto – who created Bitcoin (BTC) on June 3, 2009. The mystery person or group (or government agency) has been MIA since 2011. Yet 1 million Bitcoins remain in their original account, untouched. His wallet is estimated to be worth over $81 billion at the time of this writing, and if this is indeed an individual, he or she is one of the top 15 richest people in the world. They have never moved a fraction of a BTC from their account. So, one wallet contains 5% of all mined bitcoin. Will this person or entity perpetually hold?

They expect us to believe some mysterious Japanese man created the blockchain technology and simply evaded all world governments. They claim Bitcoin is an anti-government vehicle, but it is a bureaucrat’s dream because it allows them to track where funds are coming from and going. In 1996, the US government released a white paper entitled, “How to make a mint: the cryptography of anonymous electronic cash.” Released by the National Security Agency Office of Information Security Research and Technology, this document explains how a government agency could create something like Bitcoin or another cryptocurrency. They had been attempting to create one for years and then magically Bitcoin came on the scene.

I encourage anyone interested in crypto to read my article regarding this study. Blockchain was created with surveillance at the top of mind.

HowtoMakeaMint2

Bitcoin’s price is akin to the problem that existed when the bubble burst in 1966 with mutual funds because they were listed back then. The value can change at a volatility rate of 10x that of the dollar, making it a highly dangerous instrument as a store of wealth. It is solely a trading vehicle until they weigh it and the value is changed.

1966Crash D
DJIND M 1966 1968 1970

In 1966, investors bid the mutual funds up beyond net asset value, so during the crash, people lost everything when they thought it was a secure investment. The net underlying assets may have dropped 20%, but they paid 20% over the net asset value and then sold at 50% of the net asset value. Many mutual funds crashed 70-90%, whereas the Dow drop was 26.5%. Ever since mutual funds have no longer been allowed to be listed. You go in and out at net asset value. Bitcoin must change its structure, or it will never become a valid currency with a stable store of value, which is supposed to be the whole point. It is just an asset class of high volatility.

I have not been bullish on digital currency, as it’s a trading vehicle no different than any other commodity or stock. Sure, a profit could be made, and many have had great success. We do include Bitcoin in our models, and those subscribed to Socrates will see that our arrays are picking up on Bitcoin next year.

Bitcoin is a trading vehicle that is no different from wheat or cattle. It is NOT a store of wealth, as it fluctuates like everything else. It rises and falls no different than any other trading instrument. It is not a “store” of value maintaining some constant value to park your money. We need to get realistic here. The concept of Bitcoin replacing the dollar fails to comprehend what makes something the world’s reserve currency. I will write a piece explaining that aspect since it is crucial to understand.

$1 Billion Couldn’t Buy the Election


Posted originally on Nov 12, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

Walz.Harris

Kamala Harris spent $1 billion on her failed presidential campaign that is now $20 million in debt. Simply looking at how Harris and her team allocated funding for the campaign is a stark reminder of how poorly her entire fiscal policy would have been for the nation.

“Instead of owning any mistakes, or being transparent about the voter data and strategies that were so obviously wrong, they shut off their Twitter account and are patting each other on the back,” a former Harris consultant told the press. “We dug out of a deep hole but not enough.”

Harris spent about $7.5 million daily on campaigning efforts in August vs. Trump’s $2.7 million. She doubled down on efforts in September and shelled out $152 million daily simply on advertising while the Trump campaign spent $63 million.

Where did the money go? Kamala Harris refused to go on America’s top podcast, “The Joe Rogan Experience,” and opted to go on “Call Her Daddy,” a sexually explicit podcast that while popular has absolutely nothing to do with politics. The interview didn’t even garner 1 million views. Harris refused to travel away from D.C. and spent $100,000 converting a hotel room into a film set. She came off as out of touch and abrasive. Let us not forget that she failed to mention ANY of her policies or why she was campaigning for weeks if not months.

Her campaign relentlessly attempted to reach the youth and shelled out $4 million on “influencers” so they could pretend to support Harris on social media. She spent $20 million on concerts with Jon Bon Jovi, Lady Gaga, and Katy Perry performing the night before the election. Then there was the disastrous Oprah Winfrey interview. The Democrats actually paid Oprah $1 million to interview Harris as a guarantee that she’d portray her in a favorable light.

She avoided any interviewer who was unpaid and unbiased. She failed to appear before the American people after she was installed as the Democrat’s candidate for nearly a month and then brought her VP candidate Tim Walz to her first sit-down interview because she is not a natural leader. The few times she did sit down for an interview, her team was left scrambling for days, attempting to decode her jumbled messages.

I called Trump’s campaign perhaps the greatest in American history. Kamala Harris’ campaign may very well be remembered as the WORST in election history. Yet, the Democratic Party is breaking apart over her loss and pointing fingers in every direction. They have blamed everyone but themselves for their failure.