Fuldaer Zeitung: “When increasing money supply causes deflation”


fuldaer-zeitung-9-17-2016

COMMENT: Mr. Armstrong, I read your piece published in the German Press Fuldaer Zeitung yesterday how “When increasing money supply causes deflation”. Thank you so much for publishing in the German media. This has opened my eyes to why we continue to decline into deflation. This proves the old saying a prophet is never recognized in his home country.

Alles Gute

REPLY: Well I am not a prophet, just a forecaster, but I see what you mean. The media is the USA are beholding to the government and banks. They cannot publish a piece like this without getting those who hold their chains angry. That is just reality.

We are in danger of going into a Dark Age. It is absolutely imperative to understand the root causes or we will turn toward more authoritarian power to emerge as a totalitarian state. We are in grave danger because the press has surrendered the very fundamental role they were to play in protecting our liberty. The surrender of the press is the surrender of all checks and balances against a corrupt government. They vilified Richard Nixon for erasing 18.5 minutes of a tape while the coronate Hillary who cannot even hold a press conference because of her Parkinson’s disease. They have doomed their own children all to obey their masters.

Can the Dow Crash with Little Retail Participation?


 djind-m-9-17-2016

QUESTION: Hi Martin,

thank you for your great work with Socrates and especially for presenting the Indicators for us whom are still outside of the Trader Level.

 

I have some question about the recent sell off in the DOW. True, it was really time for a correction/drop. But the retail investors are still on the side-lines and the interest rates are lowest ever in history. To sell off the DOW on fears of increased rates and slower GDP growth is one thing, but then what? Where to run? Interest rates are close to zero. Bonds will loose much of their value when interest rates go up. Gold does not yield. Real Estate has already topped.

You are so right that the hunt for yield will soon be transformed into the hunt for preservation of value.

So we are back to the DOW anyway, right?

 

Do you see in Socrates Indicators that this Phase Transition may emerge already in the end of 2016?

Kind regards,

HJ

ANSWER: You are correct. There will be no choice but to run into equities. With the European banking crisis looming on the horizon, real estate on the high-end has been targeted by governments around the world passing various laws against foreign ownership from making it criminal in Australia to demanding 15% of the sales by a foreigner in the USA is seized by the IRS, this does not leave a lot of room for big money to get off the grid.

 

Then there are the mandates by countries that pension funds MUST be invested in government bonds. This negative interest rate is creating the next major crisis. As a matter of law, these funds cannot even divest all government bonds in many countries. We are looking at a crisis far worse than any derivative or banking crisis. It is the Pension Crisis that nobody talks about. This is the political crisis that is bringing socialism to an end.

 

You are correct, gold offers no yield for income, only capital appreciation. That does not provide a base for institutional money to park, besides storage problems. But here to, government are tracking all buying and selling of gold. Only the institutions had to turnover their gold in 1934. Individuals could hold their gold at home in a sock drawer. So this distinction has always existed between big money and individual investors. Gold is for the individual. It cannot satisfy institutional money on a yield perspective and it cannot be protected by an institution. Consequently, gold is eliminated from a major institutional portfolio, which limits that type of investment into directing it into gold stocks for some yield.

 

All of that said, you are also correct about retail participation. That remains at historic lows for a bull market. So many people were hurt in 2007 to 2009, that they are reluctant to step back in. There can be ABSOLUTELY no major crash of 1929 proportion despite the choir of analysts all claiming “SELL” for it will go to anywhere from 50% to 10% of current value. Such a move just does not seem plausible.

dow-m-energy-study-9-17-2016

Nonetheless, our accumulative Energy Models reached the overbought stage that nearly matched our next target objective. That warned that we were getting toppy and a brief correction was likely. Likewise, the accumulative energy in 2009 at the low went seriously negative also warning this was overdone on the downside.

 

We will be issuing a special report because 2016 is 7 years up and that warned we could indeed see even a slingshot type of move. That means you have excessive bearishness and the pros will short the market. They are typically trapped and will then panic to get out.

 

Despite the claims that the bankers are too big to fail, too big to jail, and too politically controlling in Washington, keep in mind if Trump wins, we may see reality hit the bankers in the face. Without Hillary, they are in big trouble for the next loss may be their’s to keep. The “pros” are not the star traders, they are the political manipulators. The entire Glass Steagall Act was proposed BECAUSE of Goldman Sachs.

 

Goldman Sachs got caught up in the whole bull market just like everyone else. Under the leadership of Waddill Catchings who led the firm into joining the hot market by now creating an “investment trust” where he saw that a giant fund could maximize profits by buying and selling stocks. He promoted this as a business that was professional and the profession was investing.

The “investment trust” was sort of the domestic “hedge fund” of its day. Everyone was jumping into the game. Catchings just got caught-up in the whole thing and was very bullish going into the high of 1929. He gave this new entity the name: Goldman Sachs Trading Corporation. The deal was that Goldman Sachs would be paid 20% of the profit and the stock was offered at $104 per share. It jumped to $226 per share, that was twice its book value. This would be the very same mistake that became exposed in the Crash of 1966 when shares in mutual funds were then traded on the exchange allowing them to be bid up well beyond their asset value.

The whole bullish atmosphere was very intoxicating. Just three months into the fund, Goldman Sachs arranged for a merger of the trust fund with Financial & Industrial Corporation that controlled Manufacturers Trust Company that was a giant group of insurance companies. This doubled the assets of Goldman Sachs Trading Corporation taking it up to a staggering near $245 million. This was huge money in those days. The trust now, exploded and the assets under control are said to have exceeded $1 billion back then. Goldman Sachs expanded the leverage going right into the eye of the storm that was about to hit starting on September 3rd, 1929. In the summer of 1929, Goldman Sachs launched two more trusts Shenandoah and the memorable Blue Ridge. The shares were over­subscribed and Shenandoah was offered at just $17.80 and it closed on the first trading day at $36 per share. Blue Ridge was even more leveraged and the partners at Goldman Sachs put pressure on everyone to buy as a sign of support. The leverage was astonishing for with just about $25 million in capital, now there was more than $500 million at stake.

The disaster was monumental to say the least. Goldman Sachs Trading Company, whose shares had stood at $326 at their peak, fell during the Great Depression to $1.75. They fell to less than 1 % of their high value. The loss suffered at Goldman Sachs on a percentage basis was far worse than at any other trust. In fact, of the top trusts, Goldman Sachs had lost about 70% of everyone else’s losses combined.

So sometimes the bigger they are, the harder they fall.

Why East Coast Gas Prices Are About To Explode


Shutting off the gas for any length of time will certainly cause Gas prices to sky rocket!

Fed Intervention Has Completely Destroyed The Markets


The original intent of the FED in 1913 was to mitigate downturns to prevent bank failures. FDR changed that to monetary policy, interest rates, to support the federal government and that has let the FED to actually believe that can control the economy! Capital flows today are world wide not to one country alone and so we have added in the IMF and the World Bank and about the only thing they can do is screw up everything really badly and so we are where we are and a correction is coming soon!.

KOMMONSENTSJANE – TURNOUT AT HILLARY CLINTON SPEECH SO BAD THEY HAD TO IMPROVE THE OPTICS BY TURNING OUT THE LIGHTS


Trump has a strategy to win which was based on the premise that the media and the Republican elites would try and stop him. Trump also knew the Hillary was a loser and would be easy to beat. What he did is take advantage of the deplorables as they are now called but who in the past were the average Joe and Jane who had given up on politics because America was now all about Mexicans Blacks and Muslims. Well those groups are still very small and so when we deplorables woke up Hillary was screwed. Everything trump did was to wake up the deplorables and once he had us it was time to destroy Hillary but it seems she is self destructing so it will not be much of a fight no matter what Hilly does she can no longer win!

kommonsentsjane's avatarkommonsentsjane

jam44
The Turnout at a Clinton Speech Was So Bad They Had to Take Measures to Improve Optics

Posted at 2:30 pm on September 9, 2016 by Brandon Morse
Things went from embarrassing to cringeworthy for Hillary Clinton when her speech at a Baptist convention in Kansas City.

Clinton was to be the keynote speaker at the National Baptist Convention USA, touted as the country’s oldest and biggest African-American religious convention. During her speech, Clinton quoted lots of scripture, and spoke about her background as a Methodist since childhood. She even took a moment to land a few hits about Donald Trump.

But while it all seemed great if you were looking at the stage, turning the camera around showed you a very embarrassing scene. The turnout was far less than anyone had anticipated, and empty chairs filled the majority of the room. In order to try to save the optics…

View original post 100 more words

KOMMONSENTSJANE – NO, BILL CLINTON, YOU AREN’T AT ALL LIKE ROBIN HOOD


The Clinton’s are the Clinton’s they are the Bonny and Clyde of politics.

kommonsentsjane's avatarkommonsentsjane

Posted at 9:05 pm on September 7, 2016 by streiff
Lately Bill Clinton has been more than a little defensive about the nuclear powered grifting machine that is the Clinton Foundation and the moldering corpse stench of corruption that attaches itself to every Foundation effort. He was at an AFL-CIO event, another organization that is associated with grifting and corruption, and made this ludicrous defense of the Clinton Foundation
They even went after my foundation last week. Now that was really funny. Somebody asked me what I thought about it. I said, well here’s what I did. I was sort of Robin Hood, except I didn’t rob anybody. I just asked people with money to give it to people who didn’t have money.”

This is the biggest bunch of horsesh** to ever emanate from a man whose DNA was scientifically determined, via the blue dress sample, to be composed of…

View original post 343 more words

KOMMONSENTSJANE – MISLEADING STATISTICS ON INCOME INEQUALITY


I have lots of experience in statistics (formal and practical) and give a set of numbers you can almost always make them say what ever you want them to!

kommonsentsjane's avatarkommonsentsjane

income

Misleading Statistics on Income Inequality

Thomas Sowell
September 6, 2016, 12:01 am
Distorting for all the usual political purposes in an election year

.
Mark Twain famously said that there were three kinds of lies — “lies, damned lies, and statistics.” Since this is an election year, we can expect to hear plenty of all three kinds.

Even if the statistics themselves are absolutely accurate, the words that describe what they are measuring can be grossly misleading.

Household income statistics are an obvious example. When we hear about how much more income the top 20 percent of households make, compared to the bottom 20 percent of households, one key fact is usually left out. There are millions more people in the top 20 percent of households than in the bottom 20 percent of households.

The number of households is the same but the number of people in those households is…

View original post 567 more words

KOMMONSENTSJANE -LIBERALS NEVER LEARN THAT THEIR POLICIES ONLY BOOST POVERTY


As always the problem is always the government be it local state or federal and when you have them all against you it over!

kommonsentsjane's avatarkommonsentsjane

The Liberals never understand because of their lack of common sense that Liberal (socialist) policies only boost poverty.  I truly hope the voters, especially the Blacks and Hispanics can see what the Dem’s are doing to this country.

house

They’ll Never Learn: Liberal Policies Boost Poverty

Steven Greenhut
September 15, 2016, 12:21 am
Rent control will only further the state soaring housing costs.
Sacramento

I was perusing the real-estate listings for Palo Alto, California, and spotted a stylish, remodeled midcentury ranch house with a whopping 1,700 square feet on a postage-stamp lot for a mere $2.6 million. What a deal! There are great jobs all around that lovely Bay Area city, the heart of Silicon Valley and home to prestigious Stanford University. But imagine the income one would need to, say, put $700,000 down and make a $13,000 monthly housing payment.

Palo Alto is near the top of the food chain…

View original post 1,231 more words

KOMMONSENTSJANE – SOROS’ OPEN SOCIETY MEDDLING AND WANTS ONLINE VOTING – SO THEY CAN CHEAT


What Soros wants in the destruction of western civilization so he and his family and friends can become royalty with Soros as the king of course. Sadly while that will never happen many of us will died preventing it.

kommonsentsjane's avatarkommonsentsjane

anger

This guy, Soros, must have an imbalance in his brain.  He wants to have online voting.  Would anyone trust Google and Microsoft to handle our voting after they actually made the statement that they were using every means to help Hillary win – and to keep anything that makes her look  bad to remove it from printing.  I know myself I have encountered many events with both of them in trying to publish my blogs and really have run into many brick walls even though this is a paid for site.

It is wise to have a hard copy of every vote for recount purposes  As corrupt as this government is – we have to have checks and balances..

Besides we know that Soros has flushed money down the toilet by donating to Hillary, Obama, the Elites, and the Dem’s, plus anyone else he can pay off.

Why would he…

View original post 1,121 more words

Flashback: A Conservative Interviews Katie Couric – YouTube (comic parody!)


VERY VERY FUNNY a must watch