Some Prerequisites on Becoming a Naturalized Citizen of the United States


By Prof. Paul Eidelberg

On becoming a naturalized citizen of the United States, the Naturalization Act of 1790 set the criteria for naturalization to two years of residency, proof of good moral character, and an oath to support the Constitution.

It also mandated that one must “absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to every foreign Prince, Potentate, State or Sovereignty.”

Does the latter prerequisite place in question whether a devout Muslim immigrant is eligible for citizenship in the United States?

Thoughts on Citizenship


By Prof. Paul Eidelberg
December 9, 2015

1) Citizenship is the grant of a personal status to the citizen and it creates a bond of loyalty between the citizen and the State, and endows him or her with nationality.

2) Naturalized citizens may be required to take a pledge of loyalty. For example:

“I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States and to the Republic for which it stands: one nation indivisible with liberty and justice for all.”

3) Citizenship carries with it both rights and responsibilities. Citizens should work toward the betterment of their community through economic participation, public service, volunteer work, and other such efforts to improve life for all citizens.

4) Citizenship as thus defined will not be conspicuous in a population whose children were not imbued with a strong sense of national character. This obviously applies to illegal Muslim and Hispanic immigrants in America who maintain their past sympathies or attachments.

5) Japan does not give citizenship to a child born of Japanese parents if the child was raised abroad by his own parents, as might happen if the parents were in the diplomatic corps.

6) Under Jordan’s Nationality law of February 4, 1954, a person became a Jordanian national if, “not being Jewish, he possessed Palestine nationality before May 14, 1948 and, at the date of publication of this law, was ordinarily resident in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan.” This is less a manifestation of racism than of national pride and political prudence.

7) Making Muslims citizens of a Jewish state is more foolish than making Jews citizens of any Muslim state, considering only the disparity in their respective populations in the Middle East.

Just as only Jews are qualified to make the laws of a Jewish state – think of the knowledge and reverence required to preserve the Jewish tradition, its religious precepts and practices, its methods of education, the memory of its great teachers and leaders – so only Muslims are qualified to make the laws of any Muslim state.

8) A large majority of Muslim citizens of Israel identify with Israel’s enemies, including Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran. In fact, many of these Muslim citizens have aided and/or committed terrorist attacks against Israel.

9) The Balfour Declaration, the St. Remo Convention, the Anglo-American Accord, the UN Resolution affirming the establishment of the State of Israel, and Israel’s own Declaration of Independence, designate Israel as a Jewish state, and not as a multicultural state. The latter designation simply reflects the disloyal preference of post-Zionists in Israel, as well as of certain members of Israel’s Supreme Court, as may be seen in various rulings of the Court’s former and most influential Chief Justice, Aharon Barak.

10) That it is not simple for a devout Muslim to identify with Israel as a Jewish state is obvious. It is also obvious that Muslims in America are not thrilled to pledge allegiance to secular America. But that is the condition of enjoying the rights and opportunities that come with Israeli or American citizenship.

11) Citizenship for an immigrant with traditional moral values can be problematic in certain democracies.

12) The reason is this. There are two kinds of Democracy, contemporary, normless democracy, and classical normative democracy. Freedom and Equality are their basic principles. However, in a Normless democracy, freedom and equality lack ethical and rational constraints. The situation is otherwise in a normative democracy, where freedom and equality are rooted in the Bible’s conception of man’s creation in the Image of God.

13) Neither Israel nor America can be classified rightly as a Normative Democracy, not only because their Supreme Courts have legalized pornography, homosexuality, and same-sex marriage. The political leaders of these two democracies have amplified their normless propensities by consorting with and appeasing Muslim despots dedicated to their country’s destruction.

14) Therefore, given the absence of substantive normative principles and the pervasive moral equivalency in present-day America and Israel, and further, given the fact that this immoral posture goes on and on in both countries without discernible public protest or outrage; and further, since both countries have thereby betrayed their Judeo-Christian foundations – citizenship in both countries has become a travesty.

As a consequence, one may well wonder whether they are worthy of citizens sacrificing life and limb against their Islamic enemies, whose disloyal acts and pronounced dedication to the demise of both Israel and America, render these Muslims unworthy of respect and even tolerance.

LEVIN GOES NUCLEAR ON OBAMA!! We Don’t Need Your DAMN Lectures!


Levin is right of course! Obama is anti-American and always has been!

Obama would rather go to war with Russia than admit that taking out Assad was wrong!


Russia sent T90 Tanks to Syria

T90 Tanks

Russia has sent its most sophisticated tanks to the front line in Syria. The T-90 tanks are swaddled in explosive armor, causing most weapons used against them to detonate on impact. The rebels have been able to eliminate Syrian tanks with weapons gained from the West. The T90 should be much more difficult for the rebels to defeat.

Hillary Clinton: No War On Islamic State Over a Few ‘Radicals,’ but All-Out War on Guns Over a Few Criminals


Actually we are at war with both the Muslims and the progressives (Marxists) in our own government. Both want to dominate us and take ALL are freedoms.

deacon303's avatarWhiskey Tango Foxtrot

Clinton responded by almost answering the question–she admitted the existence of “radical elements who use a dangerous and distorted view of Islam to promote their jihadist ambitions,” but she still would not support war against “radical Islam.”

So Stephanopoulos kept at it, asking “What’s the problem with radical Islam?” and asking why Clinton can’t saying we’re fight radical Islam “even though the qualifier ‘radical’ is there?”

Clinton finally gave up the goods:

No, because, look, that — you know enough about religion, you’ve studied it. And there are radicals, people who believe all kinds of things in every religion in the world.

I don’t want to do that because, number one, it doesn’t do justice to the vast numbers of Muslims in our own country and around the world who are peaceful people.

Number two, it helps to create this clash of civilizations that is actually a recruiting tool for…

View original post 316 more words

The gate is now closing only Trump can stop it!


How tyrants enslave free people….

Marx said, “Remove one freedom per generation and soon you will have no freedom and no one would have noticed.”

There was a chemistry professor in a large college that had some exchange students in the class. One day while the class was in the lab, the professor noticed one young man, an exchange student, who kept rubbing his back and stretching as if his back hurt.

The professor asked the young man what was the matter. The student told him he had a bullet lodged in his back. He had been shot while fighting communists in his native country who were trying to overthrow his country’s government and install a new communist regime. In the midst of his story, he looked at the professor and asked a strange question. He asked: “Do you know how to catch wild pigs?”

wild-pigs1

The professor thought it was a joke and asked for the punch line. The young man said that it was no joke. “You catch wild pigs by finding a suitable place in the woods and putting corn on the ground. The pigs find it and begin to come every day to eat the free food”.

“When they are used to coming every day, you put a fence down one side of the place where they are used to coming. When they get used to the fence, they begin to eat the corn again and you put up another side of the fence”. “They get used to that and start to eat again.

You continue until you have all four sides of the fence up with a gate in the last side”. “The pigs, which are used to the free corn, start to come through the gate to eat that free corn again. You then slam the gate on them and catch the whole herd”.

“Suddenly the wild pigs have lost their freedom. They run around and around inside the fence, but they are caught. Soon they go back to eating the free corn. They are so used to it that they have forgotten how to forage in the woods for themselves, so they accept their captivity.”

The young man then told the professor that is exactly what he sees happening in America . The government keeps pushing us toward Communism/Socialism and keeps spreading the free corn out in the form of programs such as supplemental income, tax credit for unearned income, tax exemptions, tobacco subsidies, dairy subsidies, payments not to plant crops (CRP), welfare entitlements, medicine, drugs, etc., while we continually lose our freedoms, just a little at a time as the government forces us to participate in many of these programs whether or not we want to.

One should always remember two truths: There is no such thing as a free lunch, and you can never hire someone to provide a service for you cheaper than you can do it yourself. If you see that all of this wonderful government “help” is a problem confronting the future of democracy in America, you might want to share this with your friends.
……help us all when the gate slams shut!

France almost gets it right, but its a very good start that Obama should listen to!


Marine Le Pen Clearly States It Is Not a War Against Terrorism, It Is a War Against an Ideology

s it right

Marine Le Pen states with absolute clarity that this is by no means a war against terrorism — it is a war against the ideology of Islamic Fundamentalism. Refusing to state that truth where “terrorism” is merely a weapon, one cannot wage war or ever defeat such a weapon because there is no acknowledgement of what we are really facing.

ECM-Islamic-State Wave 9

Even taking a cycle from the beginning of the Crusades, we still come up with avery similar time frame.* The West has a made HUGE mistake in trying to dethrone Syria. The removal of dictators in Iraq and Libya have destabilized the region far worse than we care to admit. Trying to dethrone Syria will create a vast new area for ISIS, and this, precisely as Le Pen points out, is a war against Islamic Fundamentalism, not Islam or terrorism. Identify the problem before you take all of our rights.

*Note: Ironically, it was French Pope Urban II who initiated the Crusades.

Islamic Cycle

 

Chelm


Post by Tabitha Korol

I have been thinking of Chelm* lately, not the real industrial town in Poland, home to about 18,000 Jews (60% of the population) until they were annihilated in World War II. Rather, what comes to mind is the Chelm of Jewish folklore, penned by Elijah B’al Shem of the real Chelm, and commercialized by Isaac Bashevis Singer in the 1900s – because I believe there are Chelmites among us today.

Chelm, the legend, began when God’s angels inadvertently overlooked an area while they were populating the earth with a reasonable assortment of foolish and wise souls. As one obliging angel, armed with the two bags of souls, made his way back through the clouds to correct the omission, he snagged one bag on the jagged point of a particularly high mountain peak, causing all the foolish souls to float down to earth. Thus was Chelm created with foolish, like-minded people, although there were always a few citizens who deemed themselves to be above the rest, clever and capable of discovery, analysis, and problem solving for the community.

It was on a snowy, wintry night, in fact, that the Wise Men of Chelm were seated around a wood-burning stove, trying to explain why winter was cold and summer, hot. As they sat in the firelight, watching the sparks and smoke moving upward through the chimney, one of the philosophers reasoned that as people throughout the world were burning wood to keep warm, all the heat was rising into the sky. After months of buildup, the air became warm enough to provide summer. Then, of course, when the stoves were idle and the air cooled once again, winter would return. Little did these khakhamim know that their thoughts would become the “big question” of the 21st century – Climate Change.

Despite the difficulties of migration, the Chelmites managed to leave their village, travel and spread their wisdom to others. The first Democrat debate of 2015 is the perfect example as we heard Bernie Sanders respond to what he deemed the greatest threat to national security. Without hesitation, he cited “climate change.” Challenged by the moderator about terrorism, he continued, “Of course, international terrorism is a major issue that we have got to address today, but climate change is directly related to the growth of terrorism and international conflicts.” Can Sanders explain why only Muslims, specifically, are so imbued with the desire to kill because of the climate? If the syndrome has not yet been identified, we might consider “Thermocide.”

Another intellect, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, said, “Empirical evidence alone – without reference to climate models – suggests that a general warming trend is probably affecting weather and ecosystems, exacerbating the impact on humans.” Again we might ask why only the Muslim humans are so influenced as to increase the rapes in northern Sweden by more than a thousand fold since they first began arriving in the 1970s, or to detonate themselves while killing others.

Oblivious to the 14 centuries of Islamic carnage, our sages pursue a climate change issue that is scientifically constant, and not “change” at all. Climate is used by the Left to distract us from Islam’s complicity in drastically changing America. They would sooner discuss climate than the current knifing of Jews, beheading of Christians, and killing and injuring holiday revelers. Sanders and his like-minded sages should explore meteorology.

Secretary of State John Kerry, unquestionably a Chelm descendant, legitimized the Charlie Hebdo massacre and the murder of Jews in Israel as understandable, reasonable, and warranted. He proclaimed that terrorists are encouraged by poverty, despite the oil wealth and strong financial support from the Muslim Brotherhood. He denied our American exceptionalism, and pledged to appoint ambassadors, based on their sexual orientation.

Another intellectual of the Chelm mindset is Hillary Clinton, who declared: “Let’s be clear: Islam is not our adversary. Muslims are peaceful and tolerant people and have nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism.” She further offered, “These Muslims over here are just peaceful, faithful people living their lives, whereas those Muslims over there are radical and seek to impose a toxic strain of their faith via terror and violence.” It may be that she envisions arrowed road signs, “Terrorists this way to Europe” and “Moderates this way to America,” or she had them posted during her many trips to Islamic countries. Unfortunately, signs are no solution for the high illiteracy rate, which could account for the 900 Islamic terrorist cells in the US, as revealed by the FBI. Of the latest act of terrorism in San Bernardino, Hillary blamed the inanimate weapons themselves.

Remember that National Intelligence Director James Clapper said to Congress, “The term ‘Muslim Brotherhood’…is an umbrella term for a variety of movements, in the case of Egypt, a very heterogeneous group, largely secular, which has eschewed violence…” In fact, the Brotherhood was a co-conspirator in the trial of the Holyland Foundation, the largest terrorism-financing ever successfully prosecuted in American history. A major financier of the terrorist organization, Hamas, is dedicated to jihad, the destruction of Israel, and to turning America into a Muslim nation, to “eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within.”

The politically correct are inclined to say that a majority of Muslims loathe violence, but surveys prove that the majority of Muslims want violent sharia law to prevail over the host country’s laws, and a recent Fox News poll indicated that one in four admitted that violent jihad against America is justified. The Koran commands Muslims to engage in holy war (Jihad) in order to impose Islam and Sharia law on the entire world. Sharia demands support of terrorism and suicide bombings, and conversion to Islam or death.

To say that our Commander-in-Chief is also from Chelm, inexperienced and naïve, would in itself be naïve. He has been following a specific agenda to bringing our country to where it is today, without once veering off course. If he were inexpert and bungling, he could not have so thoroughly hidden his background, divided us into opposing factions and causing chaos on our streets, rejected and rewritten laws, dispatched the CIA for secret operations, created a runaway government, trivialized our Constitution, reduced our personal freedoms, and conspired to change our national identity and endanger our existence with tens of thousands of unvetted, Koran-inspired “immigrants.”

Now, if the incoming Syrians exhibit no violence, we may conclude that climate change is not a threat. If, however, we recognize Islamic violence in the Middle East also occurs in northern climes, we would have to ascertain which changes actually result in the atrocities, or identify their teachings and laws as the true link to violence.  As for our Commander-in-Chief, he is not of Chelm. It is his “dark impulses,” the same impulses of which he accuses Americans who seek to close our borders to jihadi invaders, that are failing us.

*Chelm, pronounced with the guttural KHelm, or the Spanish “J”

The US government wants this here and so it is what is coming here and very soon!


The French Are to Surrender ALL Rights?

Hollande-3

The French newspaper LeMonde has reported from leaked documents just how much the Hollande Government wants to repeal the Constitution. Under this state of emergency, Hollande was to allow “searches of vehicles and luggage without the consent of individuals”, the “identity checks (…) without the need for law enforcement to prove circumstances special “and” an obligation to report his movements measurement (intermediate step before the arrest) “.

That still does not go far enough for Hollande. He wants without consent to “make the DNA samples” and fingerprints, for example. Then it gets much worse. He wants to “prohibit the free Wi-Fi connections and shared” during the state of emergency and remove the “public WiFi connections”, “under penalty criminal sanctions , because of the difficulty of identifying people connected.

By declare war on TERRORISM, one does not face a country or army. Thus, this becomes a war that can never end. We no longer need an invading army to destroy Western culture. Our politicians will do it for us.

Franklin-Liberty

The Government does have, almost total, control of the Press Today!


Censorship of the Press / Self-Censorship By the Press

NYTimes Censored

 

 

Many articles are highlighting the censorship of the press in Thailand where the International New York Times printed an article critical of the generals that they were shooting the economy in the foot in all its other print editions, the Thailand version displayed a blank space to let everyone know something had been removed – censorship. What is NOT being written in the West, both in Europe and the United States, is that mainstream press have SURRENDERED the freedom of the people and engage in SELF-CENSORSHIP.

Paine-Common Sense

Thomas Jefferson understood what a free press meant. It was Thomas Pane’s Common Sense that finally roused the American public to get off their ass and fight for what was important – the freedom and dignity to decide what they would do with their own labor. Jefferson wrote in a letter to Thomas Cooper on November 29th, 1802:

“The press [is] the only tocsin of a nation. [When it] is completely silenced… all means of a general effort [are] taken away.”  (ME 10:341)

Jefferson also wrote to Edward Carrington in 1787:

“The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter. But I should mean that every man should receive those papers and be capable of reading them.” (ME 6:57)

Owen-RichardIt was explained to be by Steven Bumbaca who had been the vice president of the New York Post that the press knew I was innocent after Judge Owen closed the court, threw the press out, and then altered the court transcripts to hide the fact that he violated the fundamental principle of a free society – we are supposed to have PUBLIC TRIALS. The Associated Press was in the courtroom and was removed by Judge Owen. The journalist at least reported that Judge Owen removed all my lawyers that day in a “closed hearing.”

After that incident, everything changed. The press is controlled by government in Europe and in the United States by prosecutors. The press will be given a call and told they want a “favor” to kill a story or slant it in a particular direction. If the journalist does not comply, they go after them with various laws like tax evasion or something else not to allow it to appear like direct press censorship. This is why mainstream media will not report the truth about so much. They cannot. Federal judges are appointed by politicians, they are government employees, and defend the government. The free press cannot exist with Federal Judges.

walkerAt the time that Judge Owen threw the Associated Press out and altered the court transcript to omit all these events and to remove the traditional starting sentence “In an open court”, you would think this would have been enough proof that I was denied a fundamental right beside my lawyers being removed. No, the Chief Judge John Walker (Bush’s cousin) refused to allow me to even submit an appeal. I could not get it even docketed to be heard.

The press is NOT free because they are scared to death that if they ever really exposed the Justice System and how a conviction rate of about 70% has soared to about 99% and the government is NEVER wrong, they would find themselves perhaps dead or in prison.

Hastings Michael - 2

Michael Hastings was the journalist exposing the surveillance state. Hastings wrote warned about the investigation of reporters by the U.S. Department of Justice back in 2013. He said that the restrictions on the freedom of the press by the Obama administration as a “war” on journalism. He wrote his last story before he died in what may have been a cyber attack where his car was controlled remotely and driven into a tree at top speed. His last story was entitled: “Why Democrats Love to Spy On Americans”, published by BuzzFeed on June 7, 2013.

Hastings died in a fiery high-speed automobile crash on June 18, 2013, in Los Angeles. Today, cars are connected with GSP and actually can be hacked. It is possible to take control of your car right down to the steering wheel remotely. WIRED Magazine has proven this ability. Many others have confirmed this ability to take control of your car and they could indeed kill you remotely. The likelihood that Hastings was killed remotely in a auto-cyber attack is extremely high.

Jennifer RobinsonEarlier the previous day, Hastings actually told others that he believed he was being investigated by the FBI. In an email to colleagues, which was copied to and released by Hastings’ friend, Army Staff Sergeant Joe Biggs, Hastings said that he was “onto a big story”, that he needed to “go off the radar”, and that the FBI might interview them. WikiLeaks announced that Hastings had also contacted Jennifer Robinson, one of its lawyers, a few hours prior to the crash, and the LA Weekly reported that he was preparing new reports on the CIA at the time of his death. It believed he was onto the Snowden story.

Crash-BurnThere are those Behind the Curtain that view everything only through their eyes. The game afoot is to protect themselves and prevent the truth from coming out because they have society’s best interest at heart – we just do not understand that is more important than anyone’s life or a scrap of paper we call the Constitution. We will NEVER regain our freedom until the press makes that first step. Thus, it must crash and burn – that is what history warns.