I would bet she has never been on a subway since Arkansas, maybe longer and also remember when Bush 41 wondered what a checkout scanner was in a grocery store when he was running against Clinton.
Monthly Archives: April 2016
Rudy Giuliani: “I will vote for Donald Trump”…
My prediction is that Trump will get 80 or more delegates from New York on the 19th.
The Paid DC Shrills Continue – Erick Erickson Now Attacks Paul Ryan Primary Opponent…
The entire entertainment, news and media system has been corrupted; and is all in lock step to support the globalists or New Word Order (NWO) or the US Uni-a-Party made up from the remains of the former DNC and RNC. These organizations and parties are funded by the elites from Wall Street and the international banks which own them. We are being taken over and if we are not careful and elect Trump and them hold his feet to the fire we The USA and all it stood for will be gone within a year years. We can not let this happen!
The ECB is Losing Control of the Monetary System in Europe
Armstrong Economics Blog
Re-Posted Apr 7, 2016 by Martin Armstrong
In Naples, riots against Renzi resulted in clashes between police and demonstrators. On Wednesday, Italy’s government had to address the plight of Italian banks which now seems to be significant as both houses of parliament blessed in a crisis meeting, voted to create a state fund for bad loans from. Resistance to Renzi’s idea was very limited. In Naples there were serious riots against it. In reality, Italy’s government has survived a vote of confidence in this decree involving a bank rescue. The Senate rushed together late on Wednesday afternoon. In the House of Lords, the vote was 171 for the plans, 105 against. This is now all about state guarantees for banks that could collapse under the weight of bad loans and that day is coming rapidly as all the QE efforts of the ECB do nothing to reverse the crisis in banking or the economy. Nonetheless, the House of Representatives had already passed the decree while Prime Minister Matteo Renzi had only a very thin majority in the Senate. The crisis appears to force the measure through demonstrating how bad the banks really are in Italy.
The new plan envisages that banks can bundle their bad loans into new financial products, and then sell them. But who will buy them? On Tuesday it was announced that the government plans to fund the money houses buy the bad loans. The decree also provides for the formation of a holding company to merge the 371 small credit unions. Therefore, it is placing the bad loans outside the banking system. The EU rules for bail-ins are breaking down. Each country is beginning to ignore Brussels and proceed in their own manner demonstrating that the ECB is really losing control.
Obama wants Worldwide Taxes
Armstrong Economics Blog
Re-Posted Apr 7, 2016 by Martin Armstrong
Obama is calling for tax reform worldwide the same as his socialist IMF candidate Christine Lagarde. Obama said “There is no doubt that the problem of global tax avoidance generally is a huge problem.” This whole issue always focuses on people not paying whatever the government demands. It never addresses government squandering money. Obama went on to say “We shouldn’t make it legal to engage in transactions just to avoid taxes.” He further added that “the basic principle of making sure everyone pays their fair share”. These statements are so dishonest and Orwellian it is frightening for the less educated cheer. If one of your parents was American and you were born in Canada and paid taxes their your whole life, the IRS is after them because all Americans owe taxes to Washington even if you never lived here or used any services to justify paying your “fair share” or something you do not use. This statement is so twisted because it is government who sees whatever you earn as their’s and it is they who want a share of your earnings regardless if it is fair. They rob us of money we pay into Social Security and never allow the average person to earn money for retirement. The “rich” get rich from investment, not wages. They rob the citizen of that money and then promise to given they payments in the future never investing anything.
When will the ignorant wake up?
Cruz Defeats Trump in Wisconsin Is This 1828-1832 All Over Again?
Armstrong Economics Blog
Re-Posted Apr 7, 2016 by Martin Armstrong
Inside sources have relayed that from the outset, Cruz is very much disliked behind the curtain. His entire strategy from the beginning has been to be the last man standing against Trump assuming the Party will install him despite the fact most really dislike him.
All the exit polls have shown that more than half of voters in this Republican primary were merely “dissatisfied” with government, compared to one-third who were simply outright “angry.” The voters in Wisconsin seem to be more in never-never-land and said for the most part they want someone with experience. That is how the USA will implode for there is nobody in the establishment that gives a shit about the people; this is all about them. So that experience will be a vote for more of the same.
Nevertheless, we have to understand that we have two major risks in politics. First, the establishment may not select Trump or Cruz and if they can simply defeat Trump on the first ballot, then all bets are off and they can even nominate someone who did not bother to run like Romney.
If we assume that Trump will not get the Republican nomination, then if he was smart, he could get on the ballot as a Libertarian since they have already done the heavy lifting. Or, Trump can get on the ballot in a few states and win those but not the general election. This could prevent either Republican or Democrat from winning enough votes for the Electorial College who really votes for President, not the people.
If we end up with nobody winning enough Electorial College votes, then we enter the ultimate demonstration that we do not live in a Democracy by any measure. A failure for any candidate to win the required votes at the Electorial College means the current establishment on Capital Hill gets to select the next President.

The election of 1828 is the example of how the establishment can do as they like. Andrew Jackson won 642,806 popular votes of 55.93%. John Quincy Adams won 501,967 popular votes 43.68%. Neither won the Electorial College so Congress picked the president and Jackson lost. When Jackson finally became president in the 1832 election, he did two major things which were against the establishment. First, he actually paid down the national debt. President Andrew Jackson reported that the United States would be debt-free as of January 1, 1835. This marked the first and only time that the United States, or any other major nation in history, had ever been free from debt. Jackson declared:
“Let us commemorate the payment of the public debt as an event that gives us increased power as a nation and reflects luster on our Federal Union.”
In the course of this objective, Jackson generally opposed bills that allocated taxpayer money for “internal improvements” what we call “pork barrel spending” today. In the 1863 popular story, “The Children of the Public”, Edward Everett Hale used the term pork barrel as a homely metaphor for any form of public spending to the citizenry. However, after the American Civil War, the term’s usage turned derogatory.

Andrew Jackson despised the Second Bank of the United States not because it held too much power over the economy, but actually because his political enemies controlled it. Jackson set out to destroy the Bank for it had even provided loans to his political rivals. The Bank’s President, Nicholas Biddle (1786-1844), routinely used lending practices for political gain, including using Bank funds to publish newspaper attacks on opponents as some money center trading NY banks engage in to this day. Biddle openly favored the National Republicans (later to become the Whig Party), many of whom benefited financially from Biddle’s favor. Prominent National Republicans were Congressmen Daniel Webster (who was on the Bank’s payroll as a legal counsel) and of course Jackson’s arch enemy, Henry Clay, who was again his opponent in the 1832 presidential election but lost.
It is ironic that the New York bankers today own Cruz and Hillary. Both engage in funding their elections not much different from the actions of Biddle. Those who want to see the Federal Reserve eliminated citing what Jackson had done, fail to understand what really took place. The destruction of the Second Bank of the United States resulted in the Panic of 1837, the Sovereign Debt defaults of states in the 1840s, and a severe economic decline which set the stage for the Civil War. The parallel to today is not the Federal Reserve with political power, but the New York bankers.
Our models are starting to highlight Panic Cycles hitting in August. This will start just after the Republican convention. If we are going to go to the extreme in this collapse of confidence in government, then we may see a repeat of the 1828 election. However, we are also in a battle today against the establishment and Trump is closer to Andrew Jackson than anyone else running for office. So the future looks like a political war ahead that is going to turn everything upside down for the establishment are focused on just defeating Trump and they think everyone will go back to watching soap-operas and sports and they can rob us and our children blind as always.
#NewYorkValues – Donald Trump Rallies New Yorkers – First Event 18,000+…
We are now in Trump Land NY, CT, DE, MD, PA & RI with 267 delegates. Thump can get all of them and that puts him at 1000 +/- and if he can get CA and a couple more then he is in with over 1237. This is very doable given the make up of remaining states.
Wisconsin Post Election Night Debrief…
The only candidate running now that has a chance to win the nomination is Trump and since he is the only one that might be able to actually make a difference and reverse the destruction of the Republic we must rally all our supporters and get them to vote for Trump. Cruz is nothing more than a slick talking attorney, just like the rest of them in Washington, and WILL NOT do any of the things he claims he will; he will not do them because its impossible in this cycle for the Senate to become 60 Republicans or better and 40 or less Democrats. Cruz knows this so even though he makes the promises he knows that they will never happen and things will stay just as they are which is WHAT CRUZ AND THE RNC/GOPe WANTS.
Trump has the ability to motivate the public and therefor the congress and so he is the only one that might be able to get things done, since he is the only one that wants to.
Soros and Many Hedge Funds are Pouring BIG Money into Hillary
Armstrong Economics Blog
Re-Posted Apr 5, 2016 by Martin Armstrong
Federal Election Commission records show Hedge Fund billionaire George Soros donated $343,400 to the Hillary Victory Fund while pouring in a whopping $7 million into Priorities USA the Super Pac supporting Hillary to further her occupation of the Oval Office. Donald Sussman of Paloma Partners, gave $343,400 to the Hillary Victory Fund and also donated $2.5 million to Priorities USA. Also we find huge amounts being delivered to the Super Pac supporting Hillary by James Simons, the billionaire founder of hedge fund Renaissance Technologies. Jay T. Snyder of HBJ Investments, a private equity firm, dropped over $300,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund along with many hedge fund operators.
This demonstrates that Hillary is by no means going to help society. These people would not be donating to her if they thought she would be going after Wall Street. The list of donors to Hillary should provide a good list of people you better keep an eye on very closely in a Clinton White House. What they did for Wall Street the last time from repealing Glass-Steagal to handing students to the bankers eliminating their right to ever go bankrupt, you can bet these people are funding the next crisis.
ICIJ’s Political Agenda May Backfire
Armstrong Economics Blog
Re-Posted Apr 5, 2016 by Martin Armstrong
Wile the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) has clearly targeted Putin, in doing so when it is his aids rather than him personally calls into question what is their real political agenda. Icelandic Prime Minister Sigmundur David Gunnlaugsson resigned just 2 days after the papers were released. Reports say that 12 current or former heads of state are mentioned. Who are they protecting will be very interesting since targeting Putin makes this more of a political plot.
Nevertheless, this is coming precisely in line with the other side of 2015.75, which we warned would prove to be the peak in government. This is playing directly into the cycles where our model has been warning we are facing the collapse in confidence in government; i.e. politicians. This is truly the driving force behind Trump. But this massive leak may have far more political implications than merely targeting rich people who have a secret stash.
To what extent will this leak alter politics in an era of rising middle-class discontent and declining living standards as socialism collapses. This leak is more likely to fuel further anger among those who blame politicians and see the corruption boiling to the surface. The journalists are really closet socialists and have hoped that this will inspire the public to hand more control to government as a backlash against what they hoped to prove was the middle class is carrying a disproportionate share of the burden in supporting a system that seems to them unfair because the rich have more. They do not look at government and the corruption. Instead, they just want to blame the rich for having more than they do in traditional Marxist view of the world. They do not bother to ask why does government always have to raise taxes proving they cannot manage the economy. If someone managed your funds and lost whatever you gave them each month and then blamed the bankers so give them more to manage again, how many time will you keep giving them more money when they never produce a profit? The hedge funds and Wall Street own Hillary, yet they will never expose such connections and truly investigate her past. This illustrates that they too have a political agenda.
This revelation may actually backfire and produce far more political damage than just hunting the rich, which has been the ICIJ’s agenda. They may have contributed to the collapse of socialism and never understand the consequences of their actions.




