Sunday Talks – Former Secretary of State John Kerry Explains Intent of Next Administration to Eliminate First Amendment


Posted originally on the CTH onSeptember 29, 2024 | Sundance

Comrades, I’m really glad to see former Secretary of State and Climate Czar, John Kerry, outline the transparent truth of their intention in such a matter-of-fact way.   Trust me, this is a really good thing. Perhaps no 2-minute encapsulation of current events more accurately outlines the worldview of the Biden-Harris administration, than this one.

Within the recent WEF discussion, Secretary Kerry outlines how freedom of speech is a ‘threat to the global democracy‘ because the governing officials have a difficult time controlling information.  Kerry goes on to posit how the next administration, presumably in his hope Kamala Harris, will forcefully structure all the tools of government to stop Americans from using the first amendment to freely speak about issues.

Governing is too challenging, according to Kerry, when the government cannot stop people from seeking and discovering information that is against their interests.  Effective governing required compliant adherence to a singular ideology.  Against the backdrop of COVID-19 and a host of similarly related government narratives, if people are free to find alternative information and think for themselves, they become increasingly more difficult to control.  Yes, this is said quite openly.  This is the mindset of those in power.  WATCH: 

.

On another positive note, millions of people now accurately understand why it is so important to refute the terms “mis-dis-mal information.”  When CTH initially warned about the labeling, most people did not understand; however, as the consequences begin to surface, I would argue almost a majority of people now understand.

2022: CTH encountered criticism for our position on information.  Perhaps it is important to step back and explain exactly why we should not be playing by rules, like those proposed by John Kerry, which are established to control us while engaged in the battle of ideas.  First, my position:

…”There is no such thing as “disinformation” or “misinformation”.  There is only information you accept and information you do not accept.  You were not born with a requirement to believe everything you are told; rather, you were born with a brain that allows you to process the information you receive and make independent decisions.”… 

There is only information.

There are only two elements within the public discussion of information, truth and not truth.

In an era filled with “fact-checkers” and institutional guardians at the gates of Big Tech, let me explain exactly why it is important not to accept the speech rules of the guards.

When you accept the terms “disinformation”, “misinformation” or the newest lingo, “malinformation,” you are beginning to categorize truth and lies in various shades.  You are merging black and white, right and wrong, into various shades of grey.

When your mind works in the grey zone, you are, by direct and factual consequence, saying there is a problem.  You are correct; however, this is where people may make a mistake. The problem is supposed to be there.

It is not a solution to the problem to try and remove the grey simply because it takes too much work to separate the white pixels from the black ones.  You were born with a gift, the greatest gift a loving God could provide.  You were born with a brain and set of natural instincts that are tools to do this pixel separation, use them.

If you define the grey work as a problem you cannot solve on your own, you open the door for others to solve that problem for you.  You begin to abdicate the work, and that’s when trouble can enter.

The sliding scale of Pinocchio’s is one of the most familiar yet goofy outcomes.

Put more clearly, when you accept the terminology “disinformation”, you accept a problem.

The problem is then the tool by which authorities will step in to make judgements.

Speech, in its most consequential form, is then qualified by others to whom you have sub-contracted your thinking.

When you willingly sub-contract information filters to others, you have lost connection with the raw information.

CTH was founded upon the belief that truth has no agenda, nor does it care about you, your feelings, or your opinion of it.  It just sits there, empirically existing as evidence of information in its most pure form.

The search for truth, in all things, is the mission objective of this assembly.   Often, we don’t like the truth; often, the truth is bitter, cold, challenging and even painful to accept.  However, the truth doesn’t care.  Information in its most raw form is ambivalent to your opinion.  If you struggle to accept these things, that’s when you need grey.  The New York Times is not called the “grey lady” accidentally.

Personally, I am an absorber of information – perhaps on a scale that is unusual.  But I do not discount information from any form until I can put context to it and see if the information makes sense given all the variables present.  When something doesn’t feel right, it’s almost always because it isn’t right.

Often, I find myself struggling in the grey and complex.  It is not unusual to spend days, perhaps weeks, researching, digging, clarifying a situation, only to discover the path to finding the truth is in another direction entirely.   Erasing everything and starting over is frustrating, but it is genuinely the only approach that works; and often finding truth is supposed to be difficult, that’s why it is rewarding.

In the digital information age, we are bombarded with information.  It is easy to be overwhelmed and need to find something or someone who has better skills at separating the black grains from the white ones.  All opinions in this quest should be considered; thus, it is important to allow the free flow of information.

I am not necessarily a speech absolutist.  There is some language, particularly foul language, that needs to be constrained if we are to participate in a respectful society, with grandma’s rules and knowing the audience.  Articulation of arguments needs to be effective, respectful and forthright.

CTH has guidelines for comments for this exact reason.  It’s not about what is said, most often it is about how the opinion is said, vulgarity is not appropriate.  Those constraints need to be based on a set of inherent values.   However, when it comes to information it is important to draw a distinction from speech.

There needs to be an open venue for all information. Unfortunately, when we begin to apply labels or categorization to information, there’s an opportunity for information to be manipulated – even weaponized.   We are in this situation right now.

Saul Alinsky spent decades pondering the best techniques to weaponize information and speech.  Alinsky’s intentions in the endeavor to change society by changing how language and information was used were not good. He devoted his completed rulebook book to Lucifer.

Be careful about anyone saying we need to label or categorize information in order to control or remove a certain speaker from the discussion.

You were not born with a requirement to believe everything you are told; rather, you were born with a God-given brain that allows you to process the information you receive and make independent decisions.

COVID-19 and the subsequent government lies, have helped many people to see just how dangerous the modern political Marxists are. Those who proposed a “global information governance board,” are now on their heels and increasingly desperate.  Hence, “governing is now hard” according to John Kerry.

The flickering flame of liberty and freedom has been under assault for decades, we are at an inflection point.  I remain optimistic in our ability to defeat those who are trying desperately to use all the mechanics of every system to retain power, for the same reason that all abusive relationships eventually have to end.

WOLVERINES!

.

Do not get alarmed, get informed.

RESOURCES:

Using AI for Content Moderation

Facebook / META / Tech joining with DHS

Zoom will allow Content Scraping by AI 

AI going into The Cloud

U.S. Govt Going into The Cloud With AI

Pentagon activates 175 Million IP’s **ahem**

Big Names to Attend Political AI Forum

DoD to use AI to monitor U.S. Internet for Disinformation

DHS Announces Guidelines for Using AI to monitor Americans.

DHS Announces “Expert Group”

Will Trachman Exposes How Kamala Wants To Create Another Legislative Body With The Supreme Court


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Sep 28, 2024 at 01:30 pm EST

Socialism


Posted originally on Sep 29, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

Capitalism Socialism Tyranny
Socialism Germans

Interview with Thatcher’s Daughter


Posted originally on Sep 29, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

Quietly Unnoticed – British Prime Minister Had Dinner with President Trump for Two Hours, But Never Met with Kamala Harris


Posted originally on the CTH on September 27, 2024 | Sundance

This is an interesting and curiously unmentioned diplomatic contrast.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer had a two-hour dinner with President Donald Trump after the U.K leader delivered a speech to the United Nations in New York.  However, intentionally unnoticed by U.S. media, the Prime Minister immediately left the U.S. following the lengthy meeting with President Trump, and never met with Kamala Harris.

The extensive discussion and dinner took place in New York, apparently at Trump Tower.  There is an aspect of typical British worry woven throughout British media reporting on the meeting because U.K. Foreign Secretary David Lammy, also attended the meeting.  Lammy once called President Trump a “woman-hating, neo-Nazi sympathizing sociopath.”

Undoubtably, when the priority of the dinner is overlaid with the U.K position on Ukraine; keep in mind a meeting with Zelenskyy followed the next morning; PM Starmer appears a little worried.  There is a massive amount of geopolitical embarrassment possible right around the corner when, not if, President Trump wins – and the position of the British govt toward Ukraine leaves them dancing alone when the music stops.

CONTEXT: Chairman Xi is big geopolitically, driven mostly by his economic position.  President Putin has become bigger geopolitically as a result of his smart post-sanction moves, in combination with his increasing economic position.  Heck, even Mohammed Bin Salmon (Saudi Arabia) and Narendra Modi (India) are now big in a world of stupidly applied Bidenomics. However, when you consider the dynamic of actually using economic leverage as THE truest aspect of geopolitical power, President Trump is GODZILLA.

Starmer and the rest, eh, lol.   Prime Minister Keir Starmer meeting with President Trump is what might be called, ‘risk mitigation‘.  And people were wondering why Ric Grenell was present beside Donald Trump for the past few days.  lolol…  {{¹Hint}}

BBC, UK – Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has met up with Donald Trump for the first time.

He had a two-hour dinner with the former US President at his New York base – Trump Tower.

The pair were joined by Foreign Secretary David Lammy for the meeting.

The Prime Minister said it was “good” he had the opportunity to meet the Republican presidential candidate and that it was “really to establish a relationship between” the two of them.

A UK government source said that Keir Starmer had “welcomed” the opportunity to meet the former president.

It added that the pair had “discussed the longstanding friendship between the UK and the US and the importance of continuing to develop the strong and enduring partnership between our two countries.” (link)

Gee…..

….. Why would Ric Grenell be in the key meetings with foreign leadership?

.

Hey, lol… I just notice the obvious!

Johnny Vedmore Dives Into Eric Weinstein’s Past Work At The UN


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Sep 26, 2024 at 07:00 pm EST

Milei Stands Alone Against United Nations


Posted originally on Sep 26, 2024 By Martin Armstrong   

avier Milei has done incredible things for Argentina. He carried the nation out of socialism-induced poverty and has been warning the globalists that their vision for a socialistic society will not be successful. Milei delivered a powerful message at the United Nations General Assembly, warning against the catastrophic attempt to create a  “socialist-style supranational government program.”

The United Nations is openly discussing how it will take sovereignty from all member nations. They believe that nations should give up sovereignty for anything they deem an emergency to push out their goal for the New World Order. The World Health Organization (WHO) has been aiding the UN in undermining individual national sovereignty under the premise that it is for utilitarian purposes.

These non-government, unelected entities are openly attempting to remove all human rights. These groups are backed by billionaire philanthropists like Bill Gates who are eager to start the next pandemic to use as an excuse to remove national authority. Milei said that the plans for power are promoting “a toxic relationship between global governance policies and international credit agencies,” saying that the most regulated countries will be forced to become “perpetual debtors” to “promote the global elite’s agenda.” They are attempting socialism on a worldwide scale where wealthy nations will be demonized. Part of Agenda 2030 clearly dictates that America can no longer be a superpower; in fact, no one nation can be a superpower, as all power will be held by the elite few.

Schwab 2030 Overthrow USA 1

Javier Milei criticized the entire counsel in-person and said that the UN has become “a multi-tentacled leviathan that aims to decide not only what each nation-state should do, but also how all the citizens of the world should live.” Milei warned against the dangers of the World Economic Forum’s Agenda 2030 and the Pact for the Future. “What is being discussed – this week, here, in New York, at the Summit of the Future – is nothing other than the deepening of that tragic course that this institution has adopted,” Milei continued.

Agenda 2030 has been around for many years, yet it is deemed a conspiracy by those who are too afraid to accept it as fact. Milei called the globalist plan “nothing other than a supranational government program, socialist in nature, that seeks to solve the problems of modernity with solutions that infringe on the sovereignty of nation-states and violate people’s right to life, liberty and property.”

The president proudly stated he would no longer remain neutral about this blatant corruption. He showed impressive bravery by speaking out directly against these agencies when no other world leader is willing to do so. The world needs more leaders like Javier Milei who represent the PEOPLE.

UN One World Government

[Agenda 2030] “is an agenda, which aims to solve poverty, inequality and discrimination with legislation that the only thing it does is to deepen them . Because the history of the world shows that the only way to guarantee prosperity is by limiting the power of the monarch , guaranteeing equality before the law and defending the right to life, liberty and property of individuals,” he added. Every single attempt at socialism and communism has failed miserably and resulted in nations crumbling.

“If the 2030 Agenda failed – as its own promoters acknowledge – the answer should be to ask ourselves whether it was not an ill-conceived agenda to begin with, accept that reality and change course. One cannot pretend to persist in the mistake by redoubling the bet on an agenda that has failed. The same thing always happens with ideas coming from the left: they design a model according to what human beings should be – according to them – and when individuals – freely – act otherwise, they have no better solution than to restrict, repress and restrict their freedom, ” Milei criticized.

How can we permit this globalist cabal to decimate our freedoms? No indepdent constitutions would exist. The globalist cabal would have more power than all nations combined. The New World Order is not a conspiracy, but rather, a clear-cut plan that global agencies are openly constructing as the people turn a blind eye.

Coming to a Theater Near You


Posted Sep 25, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

1908 Corrup Elections

Two powerful movies are coming out before the election, demonstrating how polarized this has become and the shenanigans taking place to rig this election. A grand jury was found even back in 1908, and it was “doubtful if there has been an honest election for years.” When Scotland had its referendum on leaving the UK, the extent of corruption that was used to ensure that the vote would fail was off the charts. The people they wanted to separate from were sent to count the Scottish votes.

stalincountthevote

We have been fooled for centuries. When people get power, they just never want to give it up. That is human nature. This election is between the Neocons vs We the People. You are not voting for Kamala; you are voting for the established Deep State that runs the place all the time. They wanted Kamala, who is like Biden and will sign whatever they put in front of her. Will there ever be an honest election ever?

While I would like to believe in the Constitution and government will be honest, just for once, I know that is being just a fool denying reality. I also know that there is no talking to 40% of the people on either side of this political divide because there is no chance of changing their minds and a greater chance of me only getting frustrated. As Julius Caesar said over 2000 years ago, people believe what they want to believe. All we can do is stand on the sidelines and understand what is coming.

Switzerland’s Population Surpasses 9 Million


Posted originally on Sep 23, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

Swiss Flag

For the first time in modern history, Switzerland’s population has surpassed the 9 million mark. We’ve seen the same phenomenon happen throughout the West. Populations are rapidly growing despite low birth rates, all due to immigration.

Over 27% of Switzerland’s population is now composed of migrants, with immigration increasing by 11.7% in 2023. Foreigners in Switzerland composed a mere 10% of the population a decade ago. Switzerland has not seen such a drastic uptick in immigrants since the end of the Second World War when Italian and German immigrants sought to flee their war-torn countries. Under European Union guidelines, Switzerland first opened its borders to foreigners in 2002. The People’s Party unsuccessfully attempted to curtail newcomers in 2014. Then the EU stepped in and forced all member states to adopt open border policies. Now, workers from the European Free Trade Association composed 72% of all new arrivals in 2023.

In 2022, data revealed that 40% of permanent residents were migrants (nearly 3 million people), but a third did have some Swiss nationality. Around 52,000 instances of illegal immigration was on record for 2022, but of no surprise the majority of illegal migrants are nowhere to be found within the data. The number of foreigners have been steadily increasing year after year, with immigration rising 14.8% from 2021 to 2022. Switzerland has seen people entering its borders from both the Balkan route and Mediterranean crossings.

There is a steep cost associated with a boom in the population. No one dares to question how this drastic change in the population will change society itself as many of these newcomers do not share the same traditions and values as the native Swiss population.

Whites in America are Doomed by 2045, Abortion Rules, & Western Culture Declines


Posted originally on Sep 23, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

US Population Whites 9 20 24

QUESTION #1: Is it true that Socrates has projected that the White population will be the minority by 2045?

Eric

COMMENT #1: Why do Democrats hate children and promote abortion, always claiming incest and rape when all the statistics show rape accounts for just 1% of abortions and incest is 0.5% of abortions? Then they open the borders and flood in all of these people while promoting killing our children. This makes no sense.

DK

US_population Percent Change 2011 2022

ANSWER: Yes. What Biden did by opening the border may have stacked the debt for the Democrats to retain power, but at what cost? They have not only ensured that the White Population will become the minority by 2045, but they have set in motion the collapse of the United States. The Democratic socialist policies of always taxing those who work to hand to the votes which they bribe to retain power have sealed the demise of the United States, the same way Communism collapsed in 1989. Unfortunately, this is the trend, and we should better prepare for the separation of the United States, for it will be impossible to reverse this trend for the forecast.

Thatcher Socialism

I do not care what the socialists say; this system is no more sustainable than communism. As Margaret Thatch warned, socialism reaches that point when you run out of other peoples’ money. This is WHY the United States will break up into at least three regions. There is no way these economic policies will survive. The odds are on my side. No a single city-state, nation, or empire has every beaten that forecast.

2009 Ginsberg Eugenics

In contrast, Democrats seem to hate children, for they are always championing abortion and have called it a Woman’s right when Justice Ginsberg, who was a woman’s activist, said it was all about reducing the population – not women’s rights. I do not have an answer to this puzzling question. They seem to hate babies and live immigrants. This is perplexing.

Abortion_Rape_and_incest

Even when I look at the article you sent, it is dated 2019. The press seems to avoid this topic that only 1% of women obtain an abortion because they became pregnant through rape, and less than 0.5% do so because of incest, according to the Guttmacher Institute. Yet the battle over exceptions for both has garnered seized attention in the national abortion debate. ABC News appears to have deliberately lied about ABORTION during the debate. Why? Disney hates babies, too? Planned Parenthood takes $1.9 million of taxpayer funding to abort over 1,000 babies every day. Why does Kamala want to expand abortion and make it a federally funded procedure, killing Americans while letting in millions of aliens? Hello, at this rate not only will white Americans become the minority, but Americans in general are being marginalized long-term all for personal power.

I do not know of anyone who is pro-life who would object to an abortion in rape or incest. Yet these things are thrown down our throats as if they are the entire reason for ABORTION when they are rarely encountered. I had an assistant many years ago who was pregnant and had an abortion when she was young and ended up not being able to have children after that. I had another assistant who was married and ended up divorced because she was told that she could not have children. She ended up pregnant from a one-night sand and did not know where the father went. Because of society, she thought she should have an abortion and I talked her out of it that society does not matter, she always want a child and did. I raised my two kids alone, which was why she confided in me.

US Population Growth 1950 2024
Population Growth 1950 2022

Some have argued that flooding Europe and America with aliens is also because our pension system is based on Ponzi schemes. In other words, the assumption that the next generation will always be larger than the previous, and thus taxing the next generation to pay for the previous was the model. But when the birthrate collapses, the entire pension scheme will crumble. So they have let these people in for tax purposes; others say they need them because of their intentions to invade Russia, but at the end of the day, their culture is at odds with our own, and that means that these actions will ensure the decline and fall of Western culture and the Financial Capital of the World will indeed move to China posted 2032.

Augustus Plaque ITALIAN_Reggio_Emilia_._ca_1550_15

This whole thing about abortion is nothing more than the Gates/Rockefeller agenda of reducing the world’s population. Nothing is investigated dispassionately, and the population has always been rising and falling. In fact, the birth rate always declines with economic prosperity. That’s why the first Roman Emperor Augustus (27BC-14AD) instituted his famous family laws and punished bachelors for not getting married. You were prejudiced from rising politically if you did not have children. That was the reaction to the declining birth rate in Roman History. If these people would study history, they would see there is a cycle to everything and nothing is new.

Augustus and daughter Julia Denarius

Augustus even banished his own daughter Julia for her promiscuity.

The history of birth control pre-Christianity was very different, for abortion had none of the stigma in most cultures. There are even surviving documents from ancient Egypt concerning birth control and abortion. The Ebers Papyrus from 1550 BC describes the use of honey, acacia leaves, and lint to be placed in the vagina to block sperm. The Kahun Papyrus from 1850BC described birth control methods using contraceptive devices and the use of acacia gum, which has confirmed spermatocide qualities and today is still used in contraceptive jellies.

Cyrenen Birth Control AR Didrachm 294 275BC