Americans Should Not Have to Subsidize Campus Lawlessness


Cut money to the cities and colleges that allow these riots!

Full-Time Jobs Soar By 457K To Record High; Part-Time Jobs Tumble By 490K


Tyler Durden's picture

While Trump will surely point to the record drop in people not in the labor force – in addition to the overall 227K jobs gained – as proof he is starting off on the right foot (not to mention the S&P which remains within a fraction of all time highs), one other aspect of today’s jobs report the President will likely highlight is that in January, the recent trend of “part-timing” the US labor force abruptly reversed, and according to the Establishment Survey, the number of full-time jobs surged by 457K in January to a new all time high of 124,705K.

At the same time, part-time jobs tumbled by 490,000 to 27,405K, the biggest monthly drop since last June.

If Trump really wants to undo the “Obama recovery”, this is one particular trend he will want to focus on in the months ahead.

KOMMONSENTSJANE – DON’T FORGET THE PEOPLE WHO VOTED FOR YOU


I don’t think we have to worry about Trump, he gets it, it’s the swamp that is DC that is the core problem.

kommonsentsjane's avatarkommonsentsjane

Today, I was driving down Interstate 10 and truck after truck passed with oil drilling equipment which was so exciting.  I can just envision the jobs which it will create.

My question is to President Trump.  Please do something about jobs for people and the tax plan for the people as soon as you can – also cancel Obamacare right away.

Obama increased the taxes to such an extinct that people are hurting.

If you wait too long, we won’t get any help.

kommonsentsjane

View original post

CALPERS Trying to Cover-Up Leaks of their Mismanagement


Here is a board meeting of CALPERS illustrating that (1) the majority of the board is totally without any experience in financial markets and (2) they are trying to throw off the board anyone who points out they are in trouble. Pensions funds on average need 8% to break even. You will hear in this discussion a number of 5.5%. Back in 2008, CALPERS sold off its stocks to raise cash for obligations. In December, CALPERS sold off its Tobacco stocks, which was being politically correct rather then as a fund manager. You have people looking at these decisions by CALPERS, which are political, and they guess if the market should crash. That was the story in May 2016 when CALPERS was considering selling all Tobacco stocks. That decision came from the State Treasurer, not some investment manager. Back in 2013, CALPERS was being politically correct again and sold all stocks they held in two gun manufacturers. In 2015, CALPERS was considering selling all stocks to eliminate volatility.

I have stated many times that I have been called into board meetings around the world. I have been shocked at the lack of sophistication. Rarely do you find people who understand the financial markets, hedging, currency, or even how to invest. This is why I have not supported conspiracy theories that paint these institutions as all knowing. The truth is exactly the opposite. They need serious help.

CALPERS may be the second largest pension fund, but its decisions are not really professional but political. Here is the transcript requesting a board member to resign because he warns that CALPERS is in trouble. We have pension funds in crisis and these people, without experience, have been asking Congress to seize 401Ks and hand those funds to them to cover-up their mismanagement. And those who are so against Trump trying to reverse the trend in government are the ones who will suddenly find their future is gone and will still blame everyone else other than themselves for believing in a system run by people without any experience in what they want to manage. Not even Trump will be able to stop this meltdown and will most likely be blamed for it.

Bill Slaton: Yeah, I have some more comments, and I wrote them out and thought about this a lot because after I read these comments I thought about them and I shared some of the concerns, and as I look at these and think back over the last 18 months – and Mr. Jelincic, I’m going to address you in this – that as I’ve observed, you’ve taken unilateral actions that to me are clear violations of fiduciary duty, and by implication placed our fiduciary duty as a board at risk, and the common theme is the disrespect for the governing rules of the organization.

“To be more specific, I’m talking about the disregard for confidentiality of materials or decisions reviewed or made by this board, but I want to be very clear about this. The comments I’m making today have nothing to do with Mr. Jelincic’s views regarding the issues this board faces, nor is it about his fair challenges to staff and other expert opinions presented to us, and in fact, I believe very strongly that minority views properly conveyed are vitally important to fostering honest and robust decision making and board oversight of this organization, so given that there have been multiple times that this has happened over the last 18 months – and I say this only very reluctantly – there are in my view only two possible solutions to protect the fund from the risk of continued fiduciary violations. The first would be for Mr. Jelincic to voluntarily resign his board position. Although it is clear that he possesses extensive knowledge in the investment arena as well as valuable historical perspective on all matters pertaining to CalPERS, this behavior – again, in my opinion – negates the advantages he brings to the board and the constituency he represents. If he chooses to remain on the board, I ask the board president to place on the board agenda as soon as possible an action item regarding a sanction or sanctions to be imposed by this board, and one sanction I ask to be considered would prohibit Mr. Jelincic from attending any closed sessions conducted by any committee or the full board while he remains a member of this board due to his repeated unauthorized disclosure of confidential material.”

‘RENT-A-MOB!’ RUSH: REAL RIOTERS At BERKELEY Are NOT STUDENTS


It is a financed my the Democrats and their supporters.

Sean Spicer White House Press Briefing – February 2nd (Video)…


White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer delivers the daily press briefing.  White House Press Briefings are conducted most weekdays from the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room in the West Wing.

Source: Sean Spicer White House Press Briefing – February 2nd (Video)…

trump-23

Post-Election, Continuing Jobless Claims Are Soaring Most Since 2008


Tyler Durden's picture

After years of declines, the 11 weeks since President Trump was elected have seen something ‘different’ happen in continuing jobless claims.

 

Despite payrolls and ADP exuberance, the number of people continuing to receive unemployment benefits has risen at the fastest rate since 2008 post-election.

 

Probably just a coincidence.

DHS Secretary: Border Wall Begins In Few Months, Will Be Complete In Two Years…


Catherine Herridge files a report for Fox News from Texas where she is traveling with DHS Secretary John Kelly. TEXAS – In his first television interview as Homeland Security secretary, retir…

Source: DHS Secretary: Border Wall Begins In Few Months, Will Be Complete In Two Years…

trump-02

The Coming Crisis in Central Banking


Federal Reserve 1951 Accord

 

The question of when will central banks fail is a popular one that comes in. Suffice it to say, the turmoil will hit Europe first. While so many people blame the Fed for all sorts of things, you must realize that Roosevelt usurped the Fed during the Great Depression and imposed a single interest rate administered from Washington. It was during April 1942, when the Department of the Treasury requested the Federal Reserve formally to commit to maintaining a low interest-rate peg of 3/8% on short-term Treasury bills. The Fed also implicitly capped the rate on long-term Treasury bonds at 2.5%. This became the known as the “peg” with the express goal to stabilize the securities market and allow the federal government to engage in cheaper debt financing of World War II, which the United States had entered in December 1941. Today, we have extraordinary low rates of interest that have funded government, but has wiped out the real bond markets insofar as being a viable market long-term. The World War II accord to maintain low rates was followed by a collapse in bonds after 1951 once the accord ended. We will see the same outcome moving forward.

At the time, in order for the Fed to maintain the peg, it was ordered to give up control of the size of its portfolio as well as the money stock. That is also what has happened today with Quantitative Easing among all central banks. Frankly, the Fed back then maintained the low interest rate by buying large amounts of government securities, which also increased the money supply domestically at the time. Because the Fed was committed to a specific rate by the peg, it was compelled to keep buying securities even if the members of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) disagreed.

After the war, politicians were afraid of a new depression would emerge as they always fight the last war. They ordered the Fed to maintain the peg even after 1945. The United States entered the Korean War in June 1950. The problem was inflation not deflation. The FOMC of the Fed argued strongly that the continuation of the peg would lead to excessive inflation. A real confrontation with the politicians was brewing all year and they opposed by the Treasury who naturally wanted to keep borrowing at cheap rates.

Everything exploded by February 1951. In inflation had soared reaching 21%. As the Korean War intensified, the Fed faced the possibility of having to monetize a substantial issuance of new government debt coming out to fund that war. This only intensified inflation. Nevertheless, Harry S. Truman became president in 1945 and it was his administration that continued to urge the Fed to maintain the peg.

The financial crisis erupted into a major conflict when Truman invited the entire FOMC to a meeting at the White House. Truman then issued a statement saying that the FOMC had “pledged its support to President Truman to maintain the stability of Government securities as long as the emergency lasts.” In reality, the FOMC had made no such pledge. Conflicting stories began to appear about the dispute in the press. The Fed then made an unprecedented move – they release the minutes of the FOMC’s meeting with the president.

The conflict erupted in full view. The Fed revolted against the politicians. Shortly thereafter, the Fed informed the Treasury that as of February 19th, 1951, it would no longer “maintain the existing situation.” The Treasury was caught in a crisis for it needed to refund existing debt and issue new debt, a situation governments are still in today. They never pay off debt, they simple roll forever.

The government had no choice but to negotiate a compromise under which the Fed would continue to support the price of five-year notes for a short time, but after that the bond market would be on its own. It was on March 4, 1951, when the Treasury and the Fed issued a statement saying they had “reached full accord with respect to debt management and monetary policies to be pursued in furthering their common purpose and to assure the successful financing of the government’s requirements and, at the same time, to minimize monetization of the public debt.”

It was this accord that created a free market in government securities. The likelihood that government debt becomes extinct will appear by 2023. We can see that the bond market began to crash as interest rates were at last free to move. This is the most likely outcome of the voluntary Quantitative Easing that is really a critical issue. This time, the central banks have gone and done this themselves and they are trapped. They cannot sell the debt they have bought and therefore, we are looking at a crisis when that debt has to roll. The European Central Bank holds more than 40% of the government debt for the whole of Europe. Once that matures, who will buy the new debt the next time around? We are looking at a deflationary impact by default.

EU Demands Ireland Collect €13bn from Apple


Ireland Flag

The European Commission is demanding that Apple pay Ireland €13bn in back taxes. They are attempting to retroactively change a tax agreement made with Apple years ago that the EU now says is cheaper than any other member so that’s not fair as it would attract business to Ireland. The EU is clearly trying to impose a federalized government by removing the independence of member states. Ireland is now vowing to fight the EU. This is all leading to the demise of the EU and demonstrates that the “EU project” has long since embarked upon a political state, not a simple trade union.