Posted originally on Apr 17, 2024 By Martin Armstrong
I explained how the private sector does not wish to switch to EVs amid high production costs and low demand. A recent Gallup Poll found that Americans do not want to own an EV, and the plans to eliminate fossil fuels do not align with the wishes of the people.
Around 7% of respondents, up 4% from last year, do own an EV. In 2023, 43% of respondents said they’d consider switching to electric, but that figure has declined to 35%. Fewer than half of adults, 44%, said they’d “seriously consider” or “might consider” buying electric in the future, down from 55% in 2023, while the number of people stating they have zero intention of switching rose to 48% from 41% on an annual basis.
We know that is cost more to purchase an EV, hence upper-income respondents are more likely to own or consider owning an EV and that figure declines when we look at middle America, and further declines when we look at the working class. In fact, 61% of lower-income Americans said they would never switch to electric, an 18 percentage point rise from 2023.
Liberals are also more likely to own or consider owning an EV. Only 27% of Democrats said they would not consider switching compared to 69% of Republicans and 47% of Independents. The study found that lower-income and young Americans are most concerned about climate change, but only 8% of people overall who worry “a great deal” about fossil fuel cars impact on the environment actually own one.
Still, the government is pushing full speed ahead to ensure 60% of new vehicle production is electric by 2030 – six years from now. I explained how manufacturing is not expanding under these climate change initiatives. The private sector does not want to produce these vehicles and the people do not want to buy them. Yet, the Biden Administration will stick to these arbitrary targets if re-elected this November.
Posted 0riginally on Apr 12, 2024 By Martin Armstrong
Admiral Rachel Levine was appointed as the U.S. Public Health Service, Assistant Secretary for Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under Biden’s diversity cabinet. Levine has repeatedly warned that climate change disproportionately affects minorities. The US Department of Agriculture agrees and will begin prioritizing disaster aid to non-white Americans. A group of farmers is now suing the USDA and claiming that it violates the 14th Amendment by favoring certain groups over others.
“When natural disasters strike, they don’t discriminate based on race and sex. Neither should the Department of Agriculture,” the group of farmers wrote in a court filing. “Enjoining USDA from using race, sex, or progressive factoring when administering the programs is warranted because Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits of their claims that: (1) the programs, as currently administered, are unconstitutional; (2) USDA lacks statutory authority to run the programs in their current form; and (3) USDA failed to adequately explain changes in calculating payments when implementing progressive factoring,” the motion stated.
The Biden Administration has distributed $25 billion in pandemic and disaster aid based on a woke merit system that is based on gender, race, sexuality, or any trait that is deemed “socially disadvantaged.” Not only does this violate the 14th Amendment, but it infringes upon the Fifth Amendment and the Administrative Procedures Act. Straight white men are being discriminated against, yet they compose the majority of America’s farmers. Those deemed “socially disadvantaged” not only receive financial assistance first, but they receive larger sums and other preferential treatment.
“Disasters don’t discriminate and neither should USDA. In fact, the Constitution prohibits it,” the lawyers representing the farmers declared. “That is why our brave clients – a group of Texas farmers that includes three white men who received significantly less money in disaster relief funds from USDA than if they had been of a different race or sex – filed this case and are asking the court to stop USDA’s blatant discrimination.”
Race-based discrimination is alive and well in America. These measures violate the US Constitution and equal rights protections and create a divide between the people. Biden continues to sign Executive Orders permitting agencies to disregard the Constitution but it is downright unconstitutional and stains our entire political system.
Some insurance companies are altering their policies for corporations and business interruptions, which seems to be in anticipation of government lockdowns for climate change under the label “weather events.” The government seems to be preparing for new lockdowns under the pretense of climate change this summer. It appears that they are preparing to restrict travel starting from early to mid-June. This appears to be part of the agenda being orchestrated to prevent people from traveling for vacations using climate change as an excuse. This is part of a covert action along with the hyping of bird flu to ramp up restrictions and to force more justification for mail-in ballots as they did using COVID.
Our computer has been projecting a Republican victory in 2024. Personally, I cannot see how these Climate Change and Neocons will possibly allow Trump to win. It already appears that they are flooding the nation with 14 million aliens and are counting on them to vote for their free money and free healthcare to return the Democrats to the White House. Throw in this Bird Flu, and now what appears to be climate lockdowns, in addition to trying to seize all of Trump’s properties and sell them to the best Democratic donors for a sing. At the same time, NYC intends to actually send Trump to prison for nonsense that nobody else in history has ever been prosecuted.
I do not care if you are pro-Trump or anti-Trump. This is about completely destroying not just the rule of law but the very fabric of the United States all to retain power. The computer is warning that there may not even be a 2028 election. All I can do is report what the computer has been projecting. This is by no means my opinion or desire.
Don’t Forget to Send a Thank You to Klaus Schwab for Destroying your Future.
Posted originally on Apr 10, 2024 By Martin Armstrong
Over 2,000 women from Switzerland filed a case through the European Court of Human Rights after claiming that a lack of climate change regulations has disproportionately harmed their gender. This is the third climate-related case brought to the high court. Six young women from Portugal sued for similar reasons, as did a former mayor in a coastal town in France. The previous two lawsuits were dismissed, but the European Court of Human Rights has ruled that the Swiss government has violated human rightsby failing to implement harsher climate change laws.
Der Verein Klimaseniorinnen gewinnt in Strassburg. Wow! Die Schweiz verletzt Artikel 8 EMRK. pic.twitter.com/Xxoev9r7dG
— Brigitte Hürlimann (@brh_justizundso) April 9, 2024
KlimaSeniorinnen, as the group of Swiss women of 64 is called, declared in their lawsuit that their age and gender caused them to be more vulnerable to climate change. “I have had to enormously restrict my activities, to wait, with the blinds down and the air conditioning on (shame for an ecologist!) for the heatwave to pass, allowing me to go back to normal life,” one woman with an underlying cardiovascular illness said to the press during a 2022 heatwave. “I am fighting for my life and for my quality of life. Why do I fight? Because it’s only going to get worse and, if the government is as languid as it is now, it won’t sort itself out,” she said, describing Swiss action to date as “shameful.”
Other women claimed they felt nausea, shortness of breath, and other very typical symptoms associated with the heat. The Swiss government called their claims “quite common” and noted that every living creature on the planet is impacted by the sun’s radiation. Switzerland was already in line with the 2015 Paris Accord Agreement, but these women have ensured that their government will crack down on climate change legislation as if a pen and paper could change naturally occurring weather patterns.
“Together with the authorities concerned, we will now analyse the extensive judgment and review what measures Switzerland will take in the future,” the Swiss Federal Office of Justice said in an official statement. Switzerland is already committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 50% by 2030.
The climate zealots plan to continue suing governments throughout Europe to ensure that our way of life comes to a complete halt. If they feel uncomfortable during a heatwave, wait until they see how the world operates without proper access to fossil fuels. The entire climate change agenda is based on fear and not fact. This case is a major loss for humanity at large as the few are holding our future hostage with braindead ideas that legislation can change the climate.
Posted originally on Apr 5, 2024 By Martin Armstrong
I have written in the past few weeks that all my sources are DEEPLY concerned that the Climate Change movement is transforming into using war to reduce the population. I have warned that the Climate Change zealots who have usurped the White House along with the NEOCONS are in bed together. They are pushing for World War III and are trying to get Russia to attack anything in NATO, the same way Roosevelt got the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor because Congress would not pass a resolution to enter World War II.
Elon Musk has obviously been talking to people who are behind the curtain and been laying out this unholy marriage between the Climate Change nut-jobs and the NEOCONS. I have to hand it to Musk for having the courage to speak about those that NONE of the mainstream media will dare to report that people want to kill off 2 billion people ASAP to save the world because their clock is ticking.
These people want to kill 2 billion to save the planet. I guess that makes Hiter, Mao, and Stalin really just poor misunderstood climate change advocates. They were not evil; they were just trying to save the planet. They merely failed to kill off enough, and this clock is ticking down, and the world all comes to an end in 2027. So they are out to kill you, but it’s for the planet – and naturally, they have to survive to make sure they go enough of us.
The New York Times wrote how one of them wanted to kill all human beings to save the planet. I guess that brings the old question to the surface:
If a tree falls in the forest, but nobody is there, does it still make a sound?
Posted originally on the CTH on March 30, 2024 | Sundance
Guyana President Dr. Irfaan Ali sat down with BBC narrative engineer Stephen Sackur, host of BBC’s HardTALK, to talk about Guyana’s vast offshore oil and gas reserves and how it is transforming their national economy.
The BBC production crew came with an intent to confront President Ali about climate change and the unwillingness of the emerging nation to adhere to the dictatorial fiats of the Western world. BBC arrived fully immersed in the climate change agenda, with a narrative that stands aghast at the nerve of another nation to look out for the best economic interests of their citizens.
President Ali was not going to allow the BBC to avoid the hypocrisy within their position and he fired back brilliantly. WATCH (prompted):
Pretending leftists wonder why the world is cleaving. Then again, in order to advance their insane ideology, the progressive left must always pretend not to know things. The BBC narrative engineer is a case study in this pretense.
An entire generation within the walled and occupied West have been indoctrinated to believe in the cult of climate change. As the same ‘Western world’ loses a grip on their historic influence, the global cleaving does not come as a surprise.
People have asked me about the origin of the CBDC planning, the motive for the master design of the WEF and Western financial and corporate world. Why would they need to wall-off the West through banking, finance and economics?
The answer really does boil down to diminished influence and fear. The need for control is a reaction to fear.
In very real and practical terms, can we stop China from taking Taiwan? No.
Can we really stop Russia from taking eastern Ukraine? No.
Think logically.
In the chase for corporate profits, multinational financial gains and enrichment of the coffers, the USA and proverbial West deindustrialized. We outsourced our manufacturing to foreign nations. Those same multinational institutions, and the politicians they control, are now facing the consequences of their greed.
♦ Diminished influence.
Do we really expect China to provide the rolled steel for a war against them over Taiwan?
Do we really expect China to provide the microchips, material and elements needed for use in missiles, weapons or war material, if we make them our enemy?
Do we really expect the softened and complacent youth citizens, created purposefully to benefit a “service driven economy” from within the USA and West, to sign up for the meat grinder of yet another bankers’ war? Of course not.
None of this aforementioned action would ever happen. That’s the pragmatic reality that everyone pretends not to know.
The Western global alliance has diminished its usefulness, exploited its leverage, and expended all of its effort in the chase for corporate profit and greed. The grey zone influence is rising, an inflection point is upon us, and new global alliances are being formed – example BRICS+.
Against this backdrop, the WEF/Western corporate world is seeking to squeeze (and control) the remaining wealth from a loin cloth that is increasingly drying.
Their previous acceptance phase led to strategic planning. The powers that control the mechanisms of Western wealth have constructed financial walls in order to preserve their own system of control. That’s the big picture origin of the dollar-based central bank digital currency.
They are erecting walls and creating systems of compliance for financial engagement within a cleaved world. A cleaving their globalist greed created.
The financial cleaving creates a pipeline for money and transactions between the zones. They will control the pipeline. That’s the motive, and their mechanism to try and retain affluence (CBDC) against a backdrop of diminished global influence.
The citizens within the WESTERN construct, are seemingly trapped inside this abusive relationship with an increasingly fascist government. Note the COVID dictates.
Posted originally on Mar 27, 2024 By Martin Armstrong
Did we get enough of them to save the planet?
I am not kidding. There are now Climate Zealots who are eager to bring about World War III as the means to save the planet by eliminating 50%+ of the world population. This is why all our world leaders are promoting war, and the NEOCONS love it.
In 2020, messages including “The Earth has a deadline” began to appear on the display. Then, numbers 7:103:15:40:07 showed up, representing the years, days, hours, minutes, and seconds until that deadline. On September 17, the clock began counting down from seven years, 103 days, 15 hours, 40 minutes, and seven seconds, displayed in red.
Ironically, they may be correct in proposing that in 2027, the world will end geopolitically, but not for climate reasons. They realize there is NO WAY we can abandon fossil fuels and replace them with wind and solar. That is just impossible. To make the power grid and electric cars feasible, you must reduce the world population by 50% while maintainer the power grid as it is today. Our computer has forecast that the peak of World War III is most likely in the 2026/2027 time period.
This is NOT my opinion. I stood up at our World Economic Conference in 2011 and showed that the War Cycle would turn up in 2014, and our computer even projected Ukraine would be the place. I even posted that Ukraine would be the place to watch for the start of World War III back in 2013, BEFORE the 2014 revolution. It was Victoria Nuland who selected the UNELECTED new government and instructed them to start the civil war by attacking the Donbas. Everyone knew that would force Putin to defend the Russian people there.
Our computer is not partisan or biased and is not influenced by human intervention. It is the ONLY Artificial Intelligence Computer with a 40-year track record. The ONLY mainstream press to ever slightly review the forecasts was the New Yorker Magazine back in 2009 with the title The Secret Cycle. In 2011, this model forecasted the markets would make all-time new highs above 2007. Most laughed. Barrons wrote: Circular Reasoning: A Market for Pi in the Sky? The man who called the ’87 crash is now calling for a long-term market rise. By ROBIN GOLDWYN BLUMENTHAL. Barrons never reported how the forecasts were the only ones to be correct. They reported them in 2011 because they thought they were absurd.
Even the German magazine Smart Investor pointed out that we were the only ones projecting inflation and an economic boom into 2024, while the majority kept calling for a recession over the last three years. They wanted to know, “Could you please briefly explain your forecasting approach?”
Even with the AI craze, mainstream media is NOT interested in reporting our forecasts because they contradict the instructed narrative.
Forecasting war is NOT what I want to see. Many people have written in and said I should get the Nobel Peace Prize. Obama wanted to invade Syria, so he got the Nobel Peace Prize for promoting war. Most assumed he got it for simply being the first black president. I speak out against a war our computer is forecasting, so I am not qualified for that Nobel Peace Prize since I actually advocate peace. Nobody wants this forecast to be wrong more than me.
Julius Caesar wrote in his commentaries that people “believe what they wish,” and that statement has defined the human race for thousands of years. This is why you CANNOT have an intelligent conversation with ANY of these climate change people. It has become their religion. The stupid ones have confused climate change with pollution. They are dancing the world into a nuclear holocaust and assume that they will survive, but the other half of the world will not. They have taken over the White House alongside the NEOCONS and are on the same agenda – reducing the population, albeit for different reasons.
Posted originally on the CTH on March 24, 2024 | Sundance
It’s really not a matter of if Republican senators will leave the party in the lame duck session after a President Trump win in November; the question is: how many?
The predictability of the issue is actually quite simple. {GO DEEP} Almost all senators kneel at the altar of money, nothing else. The GOPe senators will exhaust every weapon in their arsenal on behalf of their multinational financial benefactors, prior to the November 2024 election. Once those narrative attack weapons are exhausted, they will take the deal and quit the party in their final political effort to retain affluence.
Accepting this reality, I asked the question a few weeks ago. The largest number of respondents said 1 to 3 senators will resign the party.
Lisa Murkowski switching parties is a no brainer. Susan Collins and Todd Young are two more possibilities. Mitt Romney has already announced he is leaving. Mitch McConnell has already announced he is stepping down from leadership and will not seek another term. A tenuous John Thune will only remain if he replaces McConnell. …. and so it goes.
I would bet on THREE Republican senators who will switch parties, but it could easily be more.
One thing is certain, those who do not switch/exit will remain as DeceptiCons and oppose: (a) any effort to confront the intelligence community they support; and (b) all Trump nominations, foreign or domestic policy, that threaten their place at the trough.
.
(Via CNN) – […] “I wish that as Republicans, we had … a nominee that I could get behind,” Murkowski told CNN. “I certainly can’t get behind Donald Trump.”
The party’s shift toward Trump has caused Murkowski to consider her future within the GOP. In the interview, she would not say if she would remain a Republican.
Asked if she would become an independent, Murkowski said: “Oh, I think I’m very independent minded.” And she added: “I just regret that our party is seemingly becoming a party of Donald Trump.”
Pressed on if that meant she might become an independent, Murkowski said: “I am navigating my way through some very interesting political times. Let’s just leave it at that.”
Murkowski hasn’t always been on the outs within her party. Appointed in 2002 by her father, Gov. Frank Murkowski, the senator’s politics were in line with the president at the time – George W. Bush – as she maintained a tight relationship with the senior GOP senator from her state, Ted Stevens, who helped build Alaska through federal dollars he funneled back home. (read more)
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America
Centinel2012 