Cameron is just an example of how morally corrupt politicians are no matter what country we talk about. Cameron promised a referendum on exiting the EU because he never in his wildest imagination contemplated that the British would leave the EU. So what does a corrupt politician do when he fears losing? He rigs the game. Cameron is now looking to postpone the referendum because the British people want out as a majority. The sex assault by the refugees is just the tip of it. With another 3 million coming in 2016, Merkel is destroying the very fabric of Europe. Cameron is trying to postpone any referendum until 2017 and will hope something will happen so he can just forget about the whole thing.

Withe bankers also being corrupt, they have tried to scare the British people saying if the Brits exit the EU, nobody would do business with them. Toyota, on the other hand, came out and stated bluntly the truth – they will of course continue to work with the UK. The British banks are in league with Cameron and are full of SHIT. This is the same scare-tactic the banks played on the Scottish exit and we saw similar nonsense in Greece telling the people they would “starve” because most food is imported from Europe.

Cameron has revealed his untrustworthy character trying to postpone any exit vote. This is exactly the same corruption which sparked the civil war in Rome and compelled Julius Caesar to cross the Rubicon. Why? Because the politicians would manipulate the calendar to postpone elections they know they would lose. The took advantage of the fact that the high priest, Pontifex Maximus, would arbitrarily adjust the calendar by inserting the leap days at his discretion. Solution? Bribe the high priest. The Senate fled and Caesar assumed the position of Pontifex Maximus and created to fixed Julian Calendar to end the arbitrary manipulation by priests thereafter. Cameron is following the same pattern – postpone a vote he knows he will lose.

God help Britain. Their choice is between a communist who thinks putting a maximum wage of people solves something, or Cameron who sees himself as a European before being British.

Comment: [Here is] a poll that may be of some interest to you. It says that the National Front is now enjoying a massive support among police and armed forces in France. It reaches now 51.5%. Back in 2012, it was 30%.

The comments of the “insiders” show a growing concern within the ruling elite. Basically, they say that because of terrorism, the socialist government is now praising and supporting the same security forces who actually are shifting to their main political opponent: Marine Le Pen. Even worse: they’re giving them more and more power and credits to achieve the fight against the islamist threat.

Here is a common analysis shared by the hardcore socialist within the state, behind closed doors: Hollande is following the path of Guy Mollet, the socialist Prime minister who gave up the government powers to the French Army back in 1956 when the Algerian conflict was expanding. It ended in 1958 with De Gaulle successful coup d’état.

De Gaulle actually was supported by the army and generals had prepared an airbone operation on Paris back then. If the civilian government were to refuse to let De Gaulle take over, the army would have used force to achieve it. The then government gave up and De Gaulle took office quietly.

So basically, what is remaining of the “Left” is panicking as they think the Police and Armed Forces would support a National Front victory. Which could indeed happen in 2017, 2017 will be 224 years after 1793, the year of the “Reign of Terror” organised by the republican government. At the moment, all powers were given the acting police minister (Committe of Public Safety). They had basically the ability to arrest anyone without charge and many were put under house arrest (about 500 000). THis lasted until 1794 with Robespierre fall.

Interestingly enough, in 1958, De Gaulle come back was officially launched by the army and the police. They called themselves “Committe of Public Safety”. The idea was to achieve victory in Algeria. But De Gaulle was a cunning politician and gave up quickly :

I don’t know if your computers foresee a National Front victory in 2017, or an apparent victory followed by a quick collapse of Le Pen government. But it seems that, if necessary, the Armed Forces and the Police have made their choice in case of a “civil war.

Regards.

However, Louis-Napoléon Bonaparte won the election to everyone’s shock, taking 74% of the vote. Bonaparte was NOT a career politician so the elites explained his victory as if it were a fraud. They said he presented himself as “all things to some men.” However, he was the best of two bad choices between the Monarchist right supporters and the Legitimist/Orléanist royal households. Bonaparte was seen as a man who would restore order and put an end to the political instability that gripped France in the aftermath of the overthrown French monarchy in February 1848.

1952 CIA Document to Create Nationalism in Afghanistan

QUESTION: Mr. Armstrong; I read with great interest your insight into another motive behind the illogical attempt to overthrow Syria with respect to Genie. Do you agree that ISIS has been initiated by the CIA?

ANSWER: America’s ambitions to topple governments in the Middle East goes back to at least 1952. According to a Central Intelligence Bulletin during Harry Truman’s administration, dated December 4, 1952, the CIA had sought to arm the Uzbek tribes of Afghanistan in order to instigate a nationalism movement that they hoped would spill over across the border into the Uzbek Soviet Socialist Republic, and thereby create a Muslim revolution inside the USSR.

These types of military strategies have led to a huge mess. They have  NEVER  succeeded and have always led to war in far different scenarios than those in government ever dream about. But the USA is by no means alone in this. Saudi Arabia has been also a very active partner in the game.