Sep 12 2024

Kamalas Physiological Warfare & Eating Cats & Dogs

Posted originally on Sep 12, 2024 by Martin Armstrong

COMMENT #3: Thank you for your interesting feedback on the debate; I was also very surprised at how well Kamala performed. She appeared calm and collected. Trump, on the contrary, did not come across as a resolute winner. I do not understand why he had to mention things such as immigrants feeding on cats and ducks – now he is the butt of jokes. Mind you, are the memes out there hilarious? I also think he did not expect Kamala to be that eloquent and relatable in her answers, maybe he was not even prepared himself for the debate because he thought it would be a done deal. The problem now is that she might have secured a massive chance to become the next president of the United States of America.

COMMENT #2: Kamala appears to have been over-prepared and cleverly avoided any of the real questions. I agree; whoever prepared her did a fantastic job.

COMMENT #3: What about the single pearl earring? Was it a NOVA product?

REPLY #3: I think what is going around about her earring is indicative of what our model has been warning – NOBODY will accept this election. Who knows whether her sudden articulate manner was crafted by such devices? The LEFT will call it misinformation or conspiracy theory. The Media will never investigate. So where does that leave us? As usual, somewhere in never-never-land where 50% of the people just don’t believe anything from Kamala and the other 50% hate Trump.

COMMENT #43: People may think Trump’s comments about eating dogs were a joke, but the reason we call it Chicken Cho Mein is because Gǒu Mein was made with dog meat. The word Gǒu means dog. You may think it is a joke if you haven’t lived in Asia. There is a recent controversy over the “dog meat” festival in Yulin, a city in southwest China’s Guangxi province. There was a debate over the festival, and only when it caught the eye of the West, it was forced to quietly claim that the whole affair was run by local businesspeople in an attempt to avoid responsibility. People have forgotten the origin of COVID. That was supposed to be the wildlife trade in the wet markets of Wuhan, Hubei, China, where this COVID-19 outbreak originated. They sell all sorts of exotic animals for food.

LSM

REPLY #4: Look, eating cats and dogs in Asia has been around for a long time. I have spent time throughout Asia, and you encounter everything from snakes and bats to elephants, Rhino tusks, and monkey brains. You find fried grasshoppers in cones like French fries. When there is a shortage of food, you will eat whatever moves. There have even been cannibals at times. Some enjoy leaving the food out to attract cockroaches and eat them live.

Even the Human Society posts about their efforts to save dogs and cats from the meat trade. It is bad enough that all the illegal immigrants are becoming violent and robbing as well as raping people. But public officials lie and pretend this is not happening and I was very disappointed in ABC for when Trump mentioned the subject, immediately they said the town official said he was unaware of any such documented case.

China food wet_market_sources_of_Covid_19_bats

As far as the exotic food markets, stories of immigrants eating dos, ducks, cats, snakes, you name, are not jokes. ABC News did a huge disservice with their cheap shot at Trump on this subject. The exotic food market is real in China. Stop pandering to the Democrats and pretending all the waves of immigrants is a fiction.

Video Player

00:00

01:25

ABC was UNPROFESSIONAL and did not bother to see if it was true. They used it to ridicule Trump. Officials also said there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Come on. Throwing out some unproven local official statements to cover up what is taking place is outrageous and corrupt. I’m sure ABC considers this 95-pound woman an absolute liar.

Forget the issues that Kamala never addressed. Whoever prepared her did even more than a fantastic job. They trained her in physiological warfare. From the start, she walked to Trump’s side to shake his hand. This is Pysc Warfare 101. Trump is expecting an adversary, and suddenly, they shake your hand. It is not a gesture of friendship; it is to disorient your opponent, who you have been demonizing to everyone. It is unexpected that you then shake the hand of the devil.

Trump has run for president for his whole life. People have downplayed him, saying he is nothing because he was born with a silver spoon in his mouth. Kamala’s performance was physiological tactics. She even said he was born with the silver spoon and handed $400 million at birth, knowing that is what has driven Trump always to prove he is a worthwhile person who stands on his own. That was why he ran for president, to show that this had not been handed to him.

Kamala avoided any substance, and ABC did not push her buttons. The most significant risk of Kamala is the Democratic thirst for taxes, for they never get enough. They win elections only by promising to take something from someone else. Central Banks have been neutered. Raising interest rates does not influence the government to spend less – it merely increases the interest costs to roll the debt.

Video Player

00:00

00:26

I asked the computer, using its what-if analysis, what would happen if Kamala won this election. It came back with a two-year correction of at least 20% up to the second target of 44%. This election appears to be a real game-changer.

Look, I have tried my best to prevent Socrates’s forecasts. I am the one who is always wrong. I have been unable to beat the computer even once. I’m not too fond of forecasts for the future. Understanding history, we must crash and burn, for that is the ONLY way to emerge post-2032 with a new freedom. With each passing day, it becomes more and more authoritarian. Do be shocked if one day they claim I committed suicide like Epstein or an immigrant assassinates me. This is just what they do. They will fight tooth and nail to hold on to their power. But Socrates will be correct. They will lose this fight to retain power, and in the process, the Financial Capital of the World will move to China.

There is nobody is Washington that will listen to me and change course. We simply have run out of time like every empire. They are all buried in a common grave, and because of the precise arrogance we are witnessing, PEACE is no longer fashionable. Everyone wants war. The problem with war is that even the Romans knew wars never end as expected.

Sep 12 2024

ABC’s Pro-Harris Debate Bias Was So Bad Even MeAgain Had to Call it Out

Posted originally on the CTH on September 11, 2024 | Sundance

The winner of the ABC presidential debate was President Donald Trump, not because there was anything he needed to say in order to win the debate, but simply because the transparency of the ABC debate bias was too visible to assist Kamala Harris. [SEE HERE]

It is really not worth discussing because no one in America pays attention to corporate media any longer. However, David Muir and Lindsey Davis both spent all their time attacking Donald Trump while running interference operations for Kamala Harris. The insufferable nonsense was so transparent that even Megyn Kelly was angry, albeit accepting her influence and affluence are now tied to being pro-MAGA.

It is a little funny to see MeAgain Kelly calling out the connections between ABC officials and the Harris campaign in this debate, when factually in 2015 Kelly played the role of Lindsey Davis on behalf of Fox News debate director Bill Salmon. In addition to Fox owner Rupert Murdoch trying to support Marco Rubio, Bill Salmon’s daughter Brooke Salmon was the communications director for Marco Rubio’s 2016 campaign.

Rupert Murdoch and Bill Salmon used Megyn Kelly to attack candidate Donald Trump in the August 2015 debate (sexism), and then Murdoch paid her off via a book deal through Harper Collins publishing which he also owns. So, it is a little funny to see Megyn Kelly clutching her pearls at the bias exhibited by David Muir and Lindsey Davis. WATCH:

.The winner of the ABC presidential debate was President Donald Trump, not because there was anything he needed to say in order to win the debate, but simply because the transparency of the ABC debate bias was too visible to assist Kamala Harris. [SEE HERE]

The ABC debate in Philadelphia will be long forgotten but the bias will remain in memory for a long time. Relax, none of this nonsense changes anything.

I’m still laughing about MeAgain Kelly thinking people don’t remember her doing the exact same thing for Fox News. Actually, Kelly’s hypocritical diatribe against ABC really just highlights how she believes her audience is stupid. Wait… hmmm.. “Megyn Kelly” and “audience,” eh, she’s probably right. lol

The ABC debate in Philadelphia will be long forgotten but the bias will remain in memory for a long time. Relax, none of this nonsense changes anything.

Sep 11 2024

Fading Industry in the West as Energy Policy Consequences Surface – The Grey Zone Surge Begins

Posted originally on the CTH on September 10, 2024 | Sundance

For those who have followed my travels, research and granular reviews into the background motives of the multinationals, an article within Politico catches my attention and I hope it may be of value for an enlarged conversation.

At the beginning of my post-COVID economic research, I noted all of the proactive investments by the big multinationals would benefit from a diminishment “western” economic dominance.

Specifically, I noted that if you look at the investment footprint -where the multinational corporations actually put all of that money they have been extracting from the Western consumers, you will see they have spent the past generation investing heavily in the “GREY Zone” within the map below. With that reality as the backdrop, would the multinationals lose or benefit from the “Build Back Better” agenda that pushed the YELLOW zone into a system of forced drops in the standards of living?

What you will note from the post-COVID “build back better” pushers, also not coincidentally the same interests who pushed the Russian sanction regime, is their investments in the grey zone act as offsets for the current collateral damage.

In essence the multinationals created a win/win. Their BBB policy within the yellow zone intentionally drives prices higher, while their investments were hedged creating low ‘total cost of goods’ (TCG) manufacturing systems outside the West. I previously said we should watch this supply chain carefully because from an economic standpoint we (nationalists) would suffer, the multinationals (globalists) would not.

Now, I want us to look at the first indicators of this dynamic – shared through the prism of the Politico article [excerpt below]:

POLITICO – […] Before the [Russia v Ukraine] war, the annual electricity bill was about €80,000. It’s nearly doubled since then, said managing director Christoph Keim, son of the company’s founder, a chemist who got his start after World War II with a company making disinfectants. Prices for customers rose, while profit margins shrank.

Eventually, costs receded. Relief came. But things didn’t return to their pre-war level. Instead, Keim entered a troubling new normal, where energy prices are double those of overseas rivals.

That reality is slowly eroding thousands of similar companies across Europe’s industrial heartland. Germany, Europe’s manufacturing powerhouse, has fallen into a recession expected to extend through the year’s end. Even global German stalwarts like Volkswagen, a name almost synonymous with the mighty Das Auto itself, are staring at unprecedented plant closures.

More broadly across the EU, output from key energy-intensive sectors like chemicals and steel is declining. Plants are shutting down. Industrial champions are announcing layoffs. (read more)

I hope everyone takes the time to read the full article. While the context is specifically focused on Europe, the BBB consequences apply to the USA also via Joe Biden and Kamama Harris energy policy.

In essence, it is a self-fulfilling prophecy; one you might note is exactly the preferred outcome of the Barack Obama worldview. The West spreads the wealth to the Grey zone, then the 3rd world (non west) starts to replace the economic strength of the West because they are not restrained by the insufferable policies of the climate control/energy policy group.

The West ends up in a position where we cannot compete not only on the issue of ‘cheap labor’, the historic problem, but also on the issue of cheap reliable and abundant energy production.

On the financial side, the citizens within the Western Build Back Better zone suffer through inflation and massive losses in stand of living, while the alternative areas gain the benefit of better competitive manufacturing prices. The multinationals simply shift the area from which they make money.

The “exfiltration of wealth” we have previously discussed, ends up as investment into manufacturing systems we cannot compete with.

The attendees of the World Economic Forum benefit because the multinationals who make up the WEF assembly have prepositioned their assets and investments. This is being done by design. None of the downsides to this energy policy affect the WEF bank accounts, the only people who suffer are the citizens forced to pay higher prices and fewer jobs.

This dynamic is not going to stop unless the West immediately reverses course on energy production.

In the biggest of big pictures, as the collective governments of the world are increasingly under the influence of the WEF corporatism model, now you can better understand why so many people are watching the 2024 election and hoping for President Trump to achieve victory.

This reality also underlines our catchphrase, “there are trillions at stake,” while simultaneously emphasizing why this globalist cabal wants to see him eliminated.

Please keep this geopolitical and economic shift in your psyche as you look at all of the machinations taking place within the world of USA politics. What would the WEF assembly do to retain their intention. Nothing should be considered “off the table” if you can draw a line from the visible action you can see toward the benefit they would assume.

Sep 11 2024

Kamala Wins the Debate

Posted originally on Sep 10, 2024 by Martin Armstrong

It was a lively debate, to say the least, and Kamala came off much better than even I expected. There was no rambling with nonsensical explanations reflecting that whoever prepared her did a fantastic job. Yet, Kamala’s plan is for a $6,000 tax credit for a newborn family, $25,000 to buy a home, and $50,000 credit to start a business. All they are are tax credits. If you don’t make that much, there is no credit. Even to start a small businss 50k is not enough. It would be best to have at least 250k to start any basic business. If you have that much, then the paradox is you are the hated rich.

I found Trump to be too rattled, but Kamala was well prepared. She taunted Trump, and he took the bait. She came off as someone who could be president in the eyes of the average voter. I would expect her to be now claimed to be the frontrunner. Trump never brought up the taxation of unrealized gains, which would create the biggest crash in American History.

2024 Presidential Election by Popular Vote

Two of our six models, based entirely on economics, show a 51% victory for Kamala. While four models show a Trump victory, two are also at just 51%. Therefore, this reflects a tight race. However, what is shocking is that two of the six models point to a possible Trump victory at 61% and 59%.

The 2020 election came in at 51.3% for Biden and 46.8% for Trump. It is hard to believe those numbers were correct when Biden beat Obama in the swing states. Nevertheless, the two models were a dead heat, and three showed a Biden victory, with one showing a victory for Trump. Compared to the 2024 model, there we have four for Trump and only two for Kamala.

As I have said, knowing what is at stake for the Neocons and the prospect of war in the future, I have said that I would have expected the Neocons to try to assassinate Trump, and he escaped by just turning his head at the right moment. The paradox here is that a Trump victory would make no sense when he and RFK are anti-war. This implied to me either they assassinated Trump or started World War III before the election or by January to trap Trump into war.

Just looking at the performance of this debate, you have to say that Kamala won, and she came off as authoritative for the first time. She was prepared significantly, and this was the first time I would say she could play the role of President for the Neocons. I can now see why they handed it to her.

A victory for Kamala appears to be set to unleash a two-year correction in the stock market.

Sep 10 2024

Dick Cheney’s Kamala Endorsement; Kamala’s “Issues” Page Finally Posted; Jill Stein Interview on Dems, 2024, and AOC | SYSTEM UPDATE #329

Published originally on Rumble By Gen Greenwald on Sep 9, 2024 at 7:00 pm EST

Sep 8 2024

Todd Bensman On The Biden-Harris Regime Abandonment Of Sovereignty

Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Sep 7, 2024 at 01:00 pm EST

Sep 8 2024

No Criticizing Kamala Allowed in the Press

Posted originally on Sep 8, 2024 By Martin Armstrong

United States

Barron’s June 25th, 2011

New Yorker Magazine October 9th, 2009 (The Secret Cycle)

Time Magazine Justin Fox wrote that Armstrong’s model “made several eerily on-the-mark calls using a formula based on the mathematical constant pi.” (Pg 30; Nov. 30, 2009).

Rayno Report (July 6th, 2010)

Bloomberg Network Newsletter – December 4, 1997

The Wall Street Journal – April 19, 1995
Investor’s Business Daily – December 3, 1991
International Herald Tribune – September 9, 1985
The Wall Street Journal – June 27, 1983