Monthly Archives: May 2020

May 12 2020

How Can Obamagate Ever Be Investigated If Mail-In Vote Returns Democrats To Power?


Don’t let Barack and Michelle steal the 2020 election with a Democrat manipulated Mail-in Vote

Judi McLeod image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—May 11, 2020

How Can Obamagate Ever Be Investigated If Mail-In Vote Returns Democrats To Power?
With all eyes and ears now focused on Obamagate, who’s left to fight off the Democrat planned Vote-By-Mail November 3 election?

Obamagate reveals that it was then President Barack Hussein Obama who set up the Russians-stole-the-election-from-Hillary hoax.  It was anti-American Obama who FBI-framed an innocent General Michael Flynn.

Deflect, divert and distract is what former liar-in-chief Barack Obama is all about

The revelation tells the world who Obama was and is—but will it return Flynn’s had-to-be-sold house to him, or wipe out the heartache and hurt imposed for three and a half years running on his family?

Will Obama ever be made to face justice, or has he already, just like his protege Hillary Clinton flown off, free as a bird, to mount other, even more devious plans?

Deflect, divert and distract is what former liar-in-chief Barack Obama is all about.

Everyone’s talking about Obama, the Spy who’s been working uninterrupted and under cover to bring America down ever since the election of Donald Trump on Nov. 8, 2016.

Talk is interesting but rarely, if ever, leads to corrective action.  It’s a little like the over-used “So and So’s going to carve So and So a new one”.  Sounds good but it never really happens.

While talking heads, clickbait media and even starved-for-good-news patriots are talking Obamagate up, Obama is out there “carving a new one” for an election-bound America.

It’s called the Mail-in-Vote, and it leaves his wife, Michelle and wicked Nancy Pelosi in the driver’s seat.

How’s that for Fake News disseminating pure propaganda?

“With no-excuse voting by mail already legal in 34 states, elections experts say the number of mail-in ballots could dramatically increase from the nearly 25% of votes that were cast by mail in 2016, given the public’s ongoing fear of gathering in large groups before the coronavirus is vanquished.” (Bloomberg, May 11, 2020)

“That would be the biggest shift in voting since the 26th Amendment gave 18-year-olds the vote in 1971.

“Trump is leading the Republican opposition to mail-in ballots with false claims that vote-by-mail is riddled with Democratic-led fraud and would ensure that “you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again.”

“False claims that vote-by-mail is riddled with Democratic-led fraud and would ensure that “you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again”?

How’s that for Fake News disseminating pure propaganda?

“Your president’s in the mail.”

“Democrats are pressing states to make absentee voting easier, clashing with Republican lawmakers and in some cases suing to try to force the issue. (Bloomberg)

“If the U.S. turns largely to vote-by-mail this November, the counting process could trigger unpleasant memories of the 2000 presidential ballot-counting in Florida, when it took more than a month to settle on George W. Bush as the victor over Al Gore.”

That was back in the days when the electorate was told, “Your president’s in the mail.”

“When people cast ballots at polling places, results are typically counted right at poll-closing time, and races are almost always settled on Election Night.” (Bloomberg)

Even if you’re a humiliated Hillary Clinton and send John Podesta out at 3 a.m. to begrudgingly admit defeat.

“State elections administrators are also preparing to retrain poll workers to learn how to count ballots. They’re also looking for spaces big enough to allow counting while still keeping to social distancing rules. (Bloomberg)

“Voting rights advocates say the delays could undermine confidence in the 2020 election, especially if the race is close.

“Unethical liberals” were trying to “steal an election”

“Those late-arriving ballots tend to be more Democratic-leaning, a trend that political scientists call “the blue shift.”

“When he saw his lead narrow in Florida’s 2018 Senate race, Republican Rick Scott argued that “unethical liberals” were trying to “steal an election.”

“House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy has made similar claims about late-counted ballots in his home state of California.

“The disputes would come amid a crisis of confidence in the U.S. election system. A C-SPAN/Ipsos poll in October—months before the pandemic—found that only 53% of registered voters said that the 2020 elections would be open and fair, with many expressing concerns about foreign interference, the accuracy of ballot counting and the lack of voter ID requirements in some areas.

 

 

Obamagate provides a screen for Michelle Obama who has, in effect, come up with a new way to steal the 2020 election

“Typically, about 1% of mail-in ballots are rejected for not arriving on time, missing a signature, or mismatching signatures, according to statistics compiled by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. In 2016, when just under a quarter of voters mailed in ballots, that added up to more than 318,000 ballots that were thrown out.”

…”Voting-rights advocates say the requirements for witnesses and notary seals may be impossible to meet if voters are under coronavirus-related lockdowns or in self-isolation at the time of the election.”

Obamagate provides a screen for Michelle Obama who has, in effect, come up with a new way to steal the 2020 election.

“Just last month, the former First Lady advocated for voting by mail due to the coronavirus pandemic through her nonprofit organization When We All Vote, which encourages U.S. voter participation.” (Refinery29, May 6, 2020)

And she’s doing it on the basis that her When We All Vote nonprofit organization is “NON-PARTISAN!

Don’t let Barack and Michelle steal the 2020 election with a Democrat manipulated Mail-in Vote.

May 12 2020

The Dirty Wars Behind Obamagate


Russia-gate was designed to divert the public’s attention away from Obama’s involvement — and the involvement of the CIA — in supporting terrorism in the Middle East. That policy had been approved by Obama and carried out by Brennan

Cliff Kincaid image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—May 11, 2020

The Dirty Wars Behind Obamagate

“Obamagate” is the name being given to Barack Hussein Obama’s role in the Michael Flynn case, in which Flynn was framed for wrongdoing then cleared by Trump’s Attorney General William Barr.  But why was Flynn targeted?

Flynn, a former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) and a retired Lieutenant General, opposed the Obama policy, carried out by John Brennan’s CIA, of supporting the Muslim Brotherhood and Islamic terrorists in the Middle East. He understood that the proxy war the Obama administration had waged in the Middle East had produced debacles that in Syria alone cost 560,000 lives and created millions of refugees.

Unfortunately, Flynn had made himself a target. On December 10, 2015, almost a year before President-elect Donald Trump named him as White House national security adviser, he had appeared in Moscow as the premier Russian propaganda channel, RT (Russia Today), held a conference marking its 10th anniversary as an outlet for Kremlin propaganda. Flynn’s appearance at the RT event, where he sat next to Russian President Vladimir Putin at a special gala celebration dinner, was alarming to those concerned about how the propaganda channel, known as KGB-TV, uses Americans and other foreigners to spread Kremlin propaganda.

Flynn’s attendance at the RT dinner suggested to some observers that this retired officer, who attained a three-star rank during a 33-year Army career, viewed Russia as a potential U.S. ally in the war on terror. Ironically, he had written in his book, The Field of Fight, about how the Russian intelligence services had been involved in supporting radical Islam.

I was alarmed by Flynn’s participation at that RT event and first broke the story in 2015.

By going to such an event, Flynn had made himself a convenient target. It’s understandable, therefore, why Flynn’s conversations with the Russians, including Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, would draw attention. But Washington Post columnist David Ignatius crossed a dangerous line when he used top-secret surveillance intercepts of communications between Flynn and Kislyak to generate the controversy that Obama and his aides wanted. Ignatius quoted “a senior U.S. government official” as the source of the information about Flynn.

Flynn was forced out of his new position on the grounds that he forgot to tell Vice President Mike Pence about elements of the conversations he had with Kislyak. All of this was transformed into a “scandal,” resulting in Flynn being framed by the FBI on charges of lying. He pleaded guilty under pressure.

Obamagate is more than Obama’s knowledge of what his people were doing to Flynn. The conversations with Kislyak were viewed by Obama and his people as a smokescreen designed to change the subject from the disasters in the Middle East that Flynn was exposing. The real issue, as Flynn had talked about publicly since he left the DIA in 2014, was the evidence of a U.S. role under Barack Obama and his CIA director John Brennan in facilitating an increase of radical Islam in the Middle East. He has cited the evidence contained in a DIA document, declassified and publicly released by Judicial Watch. Trump ended the disastrous Obama policy in mid-2017.

What happened to Flynn was truly an amazing diversion since Obama’s CIA director Brennan should never have received a security clearance. As CIA director, Brennan told a congressional forum that even voting communist, as he once did, was not a bar to employment at the agency. Brennan had voted for a Moscow-line Communist Party.

The media knew that the Obama administration helped to produce the humanitarian disasters in the Middle East. They ran a few stories about CIA arms shipments to terrorists in the region through countries like Saudi Arabia and Qatar but did not highlight the criminal nature of the policy. And when Flynn got into a position of power and was able to do something about exposing these dirty wars, he became the target. They used Russia as the pretext to go after him.

The purpose of the leak was to stop Flynn before he could take action to reform the U.S. intelligence community. That’s obvious when you consider that Ignatius is considered a mouthpiece for the CIA. In a major new development, Judicial Watch just recently released documents showing extensive communications between Ignatius and an Obama holdover official in the Department of Defense. The owner of the Post, Jeff Bezos, does business with the intelligence community through Amazon Web Services.

Looking back, we can safely conclude that Russia-gate was designed to divert the public’s attention away from Obama’s involvement—and the involvement of the CIA—in supporting terrorism in the Middle East. That policy had been approved by Obama and carried out by Brennan.

 

May 12 2020

Good News from the Other Side – Gates is Losing 8.6 Weeks


Armstrong Economics Blog/Disease

Re-Posted May 12, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

I have been getting calls from very key people who are starting to see the light. What is being relayed to me is that they are frightened. They have never witnessed such a conspiracy that has bound together politicians and the media against the public in their lives.

 

The Washington Post is now running stories desperately trying to support this HOAX, claiming COVID-19 now causes other diseases. They are doing anything they can to justify themselves and the role they have played in destroying the world economy. They are far too political and not trustworthy anymore. They have become a disgrace to the principle of free press. When this ends, only then perhaps will we see how far the press has fallen in both integrity and ethics. They are condemning their own families and they are too ignorant to see beyond their nose.

The goal to destroy the old world order and replace it with a zero CO2 environment is beyond the ability of humans to understand all the intricate economic connections that bind the global economy together in a functioning network.

It has been 8.6 weeks from mid-March when this virus was declared to be a pandemic. This is precisely the timing when things will begin to shift. Those who are intelligent and do not accept whatever the press and government have to say will now become their adversaries.

 

May 12 2020

Bill Gates Says his Vaccine is the Final Solution – But Why?


Armstrong Economics Blog/Disease

Re-Posted May 12, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

 

This COVID-19 is by no means even as bad a SARS. The death rate is confined to the elderly who die from the flu. So what is really going on here? All the data demonstrates that this is not a major threat to the world community. Nevertheless, it has been exploited and the real reason remains clouded in mystery. Some say it is to inject some vaccine that will sterilize much of the world to create his father’s goal of depopulation.

There is ONLY one source that knows the true thinking process behind Bill Gates — Google!  He can lie to everyone, but what he has been searching for years reveals his thinking process.

May 12 2020

Insider v Outsider


Armstrong Economics Blog/Uncategorized

Re-Posted May 12, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

Larry Summers said to Yannis Varoufakis: “ ‘There are two kinds of politicians,’ he said: ‘insiders and outsiders. The outsiders prioritize their freedom to speak their version of the truth. The price of their freedom is that they are ignored by the insiders, who make the important decisions. The insiders, for their part, follow a sacrosanct rule: never turn against other insiders and never talk to outsiders about what insiders say or do. Their reward? Access to inside information and a chance, though no guarantee, of influencing powerful people and outcomes.’” Source: Yanis Varoufakis’ book, “Adults in the Room.”

Larry Summers lives in an isolated ivory elitist tower. He does not talk to people outside his world because he sees them as unintelligent and beneath his status. The Bangkok Post wrote, “He can’t help his arrogance. Most people shouldn’t take it personally. They should just consider it a direct reflection of his insecurity.”

I hate to tell him, but many people he would consider “insiders” have often come to me asking if he is just out of touch with reality. I see many of these people who just talk among themselves and conclude this is the way the world should work. I regard Bill Gates as one of these arrogant elitists who remains clueless about the economy. Adam Smith’s invisible hand is beyond their contemplation. They think the world economy is just a set of lego blocks to play with and restructure the economy as they see fit. The world economy has evolved; it was not created nor designed in some planning room

 

May 12 2020

Saudi Arabia Triples its Taxes – The Hunt is On!


Armstrong Economics Blog/The Hunt for Taxes

Re-Posted May 11, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

Saudi Arabia has tripled its taxes from 5% to 15% on the back of this Coronavirus. This is a country now suffering from the collapse in oil demand and prices.

Federal Finance Minister Olaf Scholz of the Socialists in Germany (SPD) is already advocating “solidarity” to convince the rich to turnover their assets to the country. He argues that citizens who “earn very, very much should make a slightly higher contribution.” Behind closed doors, he wants to raise income taxes in Germany to 70%!

Believe it or not, some states impose what are known as inventory taxes regardless of whether a business makes a profit at all. In this coronavirus world, these states have shut down the economy, but businesses are taxed on having inventory which in this environment they were prohibited to sell. This will simply add to the burden of small businesses struggling to stay afloat thanks to these political decisions to close the economy.

We are looking at a wholesale rise in taxation with no regard for the economic consequences on a global scale. This is the socialist’s dream come true!

May 12 2020

Prepare to Discover That Michael Flynn WAS NOT Unmasked – But Everyone Else Was…


Posted originally on The Conservative Tree House on May 11, 2020 by 

It appears we are about to find out if one of my long-standing theories about surveillance of Michael Flynn is correct.  Flynn was not “unmasked”, because he was the direct target.

For three years the official media account of how the intelligence community gained the transcript of incoming National Security Adviser Michael Flynn talking to Ambassador Sergey Kisliyak on December 29th, 2016, surrounded “incidental collection” as a result of contact with an agent of a foreign power.

Meaning the Flynn call was picked up as the U.S. intelligence apparatus was conducting surveillance on Russian Ambassador Kisliyak.

If this version of events were accurate (it’s not), it would fall under FISA-702 collection: the monitoring of a foreign agent (Kislyak) who has contact with a U.S. person (Flynn).

In order to review the identity of the U.S. person, a process called ‘unmasking’, a 702 submission must be made. As NSA Director Rogers said: that submission, the unmasking, leaves a paper/electronic trail.  However, I do not think that is what happened, here’s why:

Back in 2017 Senator Lindsey Graham questioned former DAG Sally Yates and former DNI James Clapper.  Within the questioning, Sally Yates tipped her hand.  There was never an unmasking of Flynn because Flynn was a target; it was not incidental collection. WATCH:

.

Sally Yates doesn’t directly say Flynn was a target, but by now we all know he was a target of the FBI investigation.  As a result of Flynn being the actual target he would be directly identified within the intelligence documents because the investigation would be about him, and not incidental. But there’s more…

In the three years following this testimony, there was nothing that would deliver the answer as to: who unmasked General Michael Flynn? The reason why is simple, Flynn wasn’t unmasked – because he was the target of authorized active surveillance.

Here’s another way we know.

♦ First, Lisa Page and Peter Strzok were watching that hearing where Senator Lindsey Graham was questioning Sally Yates and James Clapper.  As they discussed in their text messages the issue of “unmasking” is irrelevant.  “incidental collection” is the “incorrect narrative”:

The “incidental collection” is an “incorrect narrative” because the collection was not incidental.  Flynn was actively being monitored.  Flynn was an active target in an ongoing FBI counterintelligence investigation.  Flynn was THE target.

♦ Second, more evidence of Flynn under active surveillance is found in the Mueller report where the special prosecutor outlines that Flynn was under an active investigation prior to the phone call with Ambassador Kislyak:

Mary McCord was the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the DOJ National Security Division, after John Carlin left in October of 2016.  McCord knew about the active FBI investigation of General Flynn. [McCord was also the person who Sally Yates took with her to the White House to confront White House Counsel Don McGahn about the Flynn call and FBI interview.]

It is now admitted by public document releases that Flynn was under investigation during the President-elect transition period when the Kislyak phone call took place.

Put it all together and…. (1) There was never an unmasking request because the collection was not incidental…. (2) Because the intercept was not incidental. (3) Because the intercept was part of the multi-year FBI ongoing investigation of Michael Flynn which included surveillance.

If my three-year hunch is correct, the lack of incidental collection is why FISA-702 doesn’t apply; and why there’s no paper trail to a Flynn unmasking request.  The intercept was not ‘incidental‘ because the intercept was the result of direct monitoring and authorized surveillance being conducted on Michael Flynn.

However, the unmasking of Trump campaign officials as noted by the concerns of Devin Nunes; which directly relates to the documents that Ric Grenell may have just presented to Attorney General Bill Barr; is an even bigger issue.

Because Flynn was an active target of the FBI counterintelligence investigation, anyone who came in contact with the target would be identified as U.S. Person 1, 2, 3 etc.

Anyone and everyone who came in contact with Flynn would be masked in the intelligence reports; Flynn would not.  So when there are mountains of “unmaskings” of Trump campaign officials, those would apply to anyone who came in contact with Flynn.  That is what shocked Devin Nunes as he outlined the unmasking requests:

March 27, 2017, then House Intelligence Committee Chairman, Devin Nunes, held a brief press conference and stated he was provided intelligence reports brought to him by unnamed sources including ‘significant information’ about President-Elect Trump and his transition team.

These reports included unmaskings of President Trump campaign officials; and included Donald Trump himself….  You know what that means:

1.) …”On numerous occasions the [Obama] intelligence community incidentally collected information about U.S. citizens involved in the Trump transition.”

2.)  “Details about U.S. persons associated with the incoming administration; details with little or no apparent foreign intelligence value were widely disseminated in intelligence community reporting.”

3.) “Third, I have confirmed that additional names of Trump transition members were unmasked.”

4.) “Fourth and finally, I want to be clear; none of this surveillance was related to Russia, or the investigation of Russian activities, or of the Trump team.

“The House Intelligence Committee will thoroughly investigate surveillance and its subsequent dissemination, to determine a few things here that I want to read off:”

  • “Who was aware of it?”
  • “Why it was not disclosed to congress?”
  • “Who requested and authorized the additional unmasking?”
  • “Whether anyone directed the intelligence community to focus on Trump associates?”
  • “And whether any laws, regulations or procedures were violated?”

“I have asked the Directors of the FBI, NSA and CIA to expeditiously comply with my March 15th letter -that you all received a couple of weeks ago- and to provide a full account of these surveillance activities.”

.

Does that make sense now?

When candidate Trump brought Lt. General Michael Flynn into the campaign, he essentially brought in a person who was under an ongoing FBI investigation.

Everyone that Flynn then came in contact with then became a “U.S. Person” identified in the intelligence reports.  Those U.S. Persons were then unmasked.

That’s why so many unmaskings.

Flynn was the infection that authorized additional persons to be reviewed and unmasked. The research therein shows up to NSA Director Mike Rogers when the NSA auditor notes a significant uptick in FBI searches of the NSA database. From Rogers position this is what he would see:

However, what Rogers would not see is the unmasking taking place at FBI for the people being searched.

This video of questioning again by Senator Graham shows the dynamic. (A) Rogers notes the FBI would likely have more incidental collection and subsequent unmasking as an aspect of their investigative search functions; and (B) He wouldn’t know because that’s outside of his compartment.

.

If my long-standing hunch is correct, we’ll soon find out that: (1) Michael Flynn was the walking surveillance infection; (2) those who Flynn came into contact with will cross-reference to the 702 “About” queries; and (3) the FBI reports on those Flynn contacts will contain the unmasked names of the various Trump campaign officials that Barr might soon release.

The FBI did not need a Title-1 FISA surveillance warrant against Flynn because they were already conducting regular Title-3 surveillance on him as a potential domestic national security risk. Thus it was all Flynn’s calls being monitored, not just Sergey Kislyak.

We’ll soon find out if my hunch has been correct…

May 12 2020

Unmasking 101: ..”You Must Make That Request In Writing” – Grenell Has Declassified, Bill Barr Will Release…


Posted originally on The Conservative Tree House on May 11, 2020 by 

During testimony in June 2017 Admiral Mike Rogers helps to explain what documents would be available to identify who was making unmasking requests. WATCH:

Note: “you must make that request in writing”; which explains the documents Ric Grenell has declassified and the probability that AG Bill Barr will soon release.

ABC News first reported the news but initially said in the title that Grenell was in the process of trying to declassify the list of Obama officials.

A source with knowledge of the matter told The Daily Wire that the list has already been declassified and now it’s on Attorney General William Barr to release the list. (LINK)

FULL BACKGROUND  – However, a strong note of caution.  Sometimes the specificity of the intelligence operation itself means the U.S. target will already be named in the originating intelligence document and would not require an unmasking request.

May 12 2020

Jordan and Biggs Tear The Bark Off Trey Gowdy, Culpable Republicans and #Obamagate …


Posted originally on The Conservative Tree House on May 11, 2020 by 

Representatives Jim Jordan and Andy Biggs tear the bark off the Obamagate scandal; including culpable republicans who participated in the DC coup effort.

Appearing with Lou Dobbs on Fox Business, Jim Jordan rips through the timeline early in the interview to expose how it was impossible for all of the activity to be happening without former President Obama being a participant.  WATCH:

May 12 2020

Tucker Carlson Calls Out (Softly) Trey Gowdy For His Prior Defenses of Mueller and Comey…


Posted originally on The Conservative Tree House on May 11, 2020 by 

Tucker Carlson has Fox host Trey Gowdy appear for an interview to discuss ongoing events and revelations showing the corrupt behavior of the FBI and DOJ.  About mid-way through the interview Carlson takes a passive aggressive tack, shows Gowdy a video of his own comments in May 2018, and asks if he is still willing to stand by them. WATCH:

.

So Gowdy waited from January 2017 until three weeks after May 2018 to go look at the direct documents the DOJ and FBI had been concealing?

Not coincidentally; and in direct alignment with the expressed defenses of Gowdy; two months later, July 12, 2018, the DOJ and FBI told the FISA court the underlying predicate for the FISA warrant against Carter Page was still valid….

BACKSTORY HERE