GoFundMe Freezes Over $4 Million in Funds Raised for Canada’s Truckers


Armstrong Economics Blog/Corruption Re-Posted Jan 28, 2022 by Martin Armstrong

Canadian truckers have continually demonstrated their resistance to tyranny with ongoing demonstrations amid freezing temperatures. Over 55,000 people supported “The ‘Freedom Convoy 2022” and donated over $4 million on the crowdfunding site GoFundMe. In response, the company has frozen access to all donated funds with a vague explanation as to why.

“We require that fundraisers be transparent about the flow of funds and have a clear plan for how those funds will be spent. In this case, we are in touch with the organizer to verify that information,” Rachel Hollis, a spokeswoman for GoFundMe, said in an email. “Funds will be safely held until the organizer is able to provide the documentation to our team about how funds will be properly distributed.”

Tamara Lich, the campaign’s creator, said that this was simply a scare tactic. “Freedom Convoy 2022” has a clear message on its site: “We are taking our fight to the doorsteps of our Federal Government and demanding that they cease all mandates against its people. Small businesses are being destroyed, homes are being destroyed, and people are being mistreated and denied fundamental necessities to survive.” Furthermore, the site said that all donated funds would go toward “fuel, food and lodgings to help ease the pressures of this arduous task.” Since over 50,000 truckers have been protesting across Western Canada to Ottawa, the expenses are rising.

This is not the first time GoFundMe has frozen funds intended for a good cause. A 16-year-old boy passed away days after receiving the Pfizer vaccine due to heart failure. In response, GoFundMe removed the boy’s campaign from their website for “prohibited conduct.” The grieving father launched another campaign on the crowdfunding site Life Funder, which may become more popular as people move away from GoFundMe. I would not want to donate money through a platform that feels the pious obligation to decide which causes are worthy of donations.

Vaccines the Question Nobody Wants to Answer


Armstrong Economics Blog/Vaccine Re-Posted Jan 27, 2022 by Martin Armstrong

QUESTION: Hi. We are currently in a matter before the courts involving our eldest child. His biological father wants him to get the vaccine against the wishes of his mother. They claim his condition (hemophilia) puts him at higher risk. Obviously, we know that this is not the case, but we’re wondering if you could give advice on what road to go down in regards to supporting evidence as to why he should not get the vaccine as an 8yo child. I’m sure there are many other parents in the same boat. Much appreciated.

ANSWER: I am not a doctor and I do not pretend to be like Bill Gates and Joe Biden. I am posting this for any lawyers willing to help on this issue, I will be glad to put you in contact. The claims asserted by the father must be challenged to where he should prove his argument that the vaccine will somehow benefit him when COVID has already run its course and OMICRON is more like the flu. My family has all gone through COVID including children under 10 years old.

The World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH) has already made an advisor stated that “People with bleeding disorders are not at greater risk of contracting COVID-19 or developing
a severe form of the disease, so they are not considered a priority group for vaccination.”

I do not see any research that would support his claim that the child would be at greater risk from COVID. I did not spend all day researching this question, but I suggest that this avenue should be addressed. This would reduce the argument to if the vaccines actually do work and provide protection that they are already back-tracking claiming it would only reduce the symptoms and not prevent the disease.

Fauci has been desperate to even confiscate Ivermectin shipment into the USA because his only solution is not treatment, but vaccination. Ivermectin is being used outside the USA and the studies are positive. Numerous doctors have been calling for real studies on this drug. New research out of Israel has found that administering the anti-parasite drug ivermectin to COVID19 patients may help to drastically reduce the duration of infections – and all for less than $1 a day.

My personal skepticism derives not from vaccines, I had my children vaccinated. My concern is (1) I know that Klaus Schwab told people a virus was coming in advance, and I was given the very code used to justify lockdowns and the computer program was a joke. Bill Gates-funded that code. In fact, not a single program funded by Bill Gates which made these dire forecasts was ever correct. Once governments were BRIBED by lobbyists to mandate vaccines around the world, and the media has joined in along with people like Howard Stern and Neil Young, I cannot see where any rational person would trust Big Pharma or government. Now that the politicians got involved, they are putting everyone’s life at risk because politicians will NEVER admit they EVER made a mistake.

I have ZERO respect for anyone who just accepts whatever the government Big Pharma has to say and NEVER question anything? These are the lowest intelligent people on the planet and if the vaccines were really some plot to reduce the population (which I do not believe), then they would be wiping out the stupidity among society leaving behind those who would question their every move. I would think the plot would be more like Stalin – kill the smart ones. As for people like Howard Stern – keep getting those boosters for your vaccine does not work beyond 3 months!


Failure of the Vaccines

The data is coming in from Scotland, Britain, Israel, and Denmark which are four of the world’s most highly vaccinated countries. They all have 90% adult Covid vaccination rates and 60% adult boosters. Despite these statistics, the vast majority of deaths are occurring in vaccinated people!

CDC Confirms the Validity of Natural Immunity


Armstrong Economics Blog/Disease Re-Posted Jan 27, 2022 by Martin Armstrong

Finally, the CDC has released a new study that finally acknowledges what numerous independent studies have found over the past year: Natural immunity from prior COVID-19 infection provides stronger protection against the virus than the COVID vaccines. Fauci has been dragging his heels to hide what every doctor knows.  If you get the flu, you do NOT then run out and get a vaccine so you do not get the flu again. That is what our body does – it fights infections and it learns from its past battles.

Click here to read the CDC’s full report.

When the Black Death came during the 14th century, yes it killed up to 50% of the population but that varied from region to region. The survivors developed natural immunity. For Fauci to wait for the 3rd year of COVID, is highly suspicious. He has tried desperately to lash out at anyone who dared to suggest that natural immunity even existed. For that reason, he just seemed to be totally untrustworthy and then he appeared in a video for Klaus Schwab claiming our #1 crisis was inequality to support this Marxist agenda. Fauci, in my opinion, has done everything to make this pandemic as bad as it could possibly be for no medical reason whatsoever.

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and State Health Officials Directly Call the White House and FDA Liars During Monoclonal Treatment Fight


Posted originally on the conservative tree House on January 26, 2022 | Sundance | 401 Comments

Keep an eye on this story folks; there’s something else here.

The FDA decision to block COVID-19 treatment options is very sketchy, and I sense that Florida Governor Ron DeSantis knows the science will not support the Biden administration.  This story -when exposed- has the potential to bring down the Biden administration, big time… DeSantis senses it.

Earlier today, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis held a roundtable press conference with physicians, clinicians and other health officials in Florida to denounce the Biden FDA decision to revoke monoclonal antibody treatments as a therapeutic option.  The FDA action was not only done without communication, but the decision was also made without study and without any input from the treatment side of the COVID-19 dynamic.

Here’s a brief segment of the DeSantis statement:

The full presser is below and is well worth watching to listen to the doctors who refute the FDA claim that monoclonal treatments do not assist patients with Omicron variant.  Doctors have treated Omicron patients successfully with the monoclonal antibody treatments. The actual doctors who are treating the patients refute the FDA directly.

The input from Dr. Dwight Reynolds is very revealing. Something is very odd around this story.

Shot Goblin Fauci Says Kids 6 Months to 4-Years-Old Will Get Three Shot Series After Political Approval


Posted originally on the Conservative Tree House on January 26, 2022 | Sundance | 361 Comments

The official U.S. shot goblin, Anthony Fauci, announced earlier today, kids 6 months to 4 years-old will receive a three-dose vaccine schedule as soon as the political operatives in the FDA come to an agreement with the multinational pharmaceutical companies.

However, other than the most entrenched Branch Covidians, who are willing to subject all of their children to the experimental drugs and gas station sushi, a wider effort might run into a much more skeptical American population.

The increased skepticism, some would say ‘awakening’ over the vaccine intent and efficacy, is highlighted by the reluctance of the previously vaccinated population to take a booster shot.  First, to the kids:

(New York Post) – […] Two clinical trials of the Pfizer vaccine on children ages 6 months to 2 years old, and ages 2 to 4 are underway, but the older group hasn’t yet met standards, White House chief medical adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci said at a press conference.

“Dose and regimen for children 6 months to 24 months worked well, but it turned out the other group from 24 months to 4 years did not yet reach the level of non-inferiority, so the studies are continued,” Fauci said, referencing effectiveness standard comparison to adults.

“It looks like it will be a three-dose regimen. I don’t think we can predict when we will see it [approved],” he said — adding he can’t speak for the Food and Drug Administration. (read more)

The shot goblin really, really, really wants those kids jabbed.  It is very important to him.  However, the vaccination effort overall is now starting to raise eyebrows.

NEW YORK (AP) — The COVID-19 booster drive in the U.S. is losing steam, worrying health experts who have pleaded with Americans to get an extra shot to shore up their protection against the highly contagious omicron variant.

Just 40% of fully vaccinated Americans have received a booster dose, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (link)

The International Business Times puts the data into context:

[…] New Hampshire has the lowest percentage of people who have received booster shots at 18.7%. States like North Carolina, Alabama, Georgia, Texas and Mississippi join New Hampshire as the states in the U.S. with the lowest rates of booster shots.

Vermont has the highest rate of booster vaccination at 56.3%. California has 41.1% of its population boosted while New York is at 39.7%, Florida is at 36.6% and Washington, D.C. is at 32%.

A vaccination campaign has been ongoing in the U.S. since the Food and Drug Administration first authorized the Pfizer vaccine doses in December 2020 and a mass vaccination campaign began in early 2021.

According to data from Johns Hopkins University, the U.S. sits at No. 58 in the world in terms of the percentage of the total population fully vaccinated, which is still above the world average. (link)

“COVID vaccines lose power,” may not be exactly the greatest of campaign messages right before the multinational corporations who run government start to push their effort toward babies.

A LETTER TO MY ATTORNEY FRIEND WHO I CONSULTED ABOUT LEGAL STRATEGIES TO GET REPURPOSED DRUGS TO COVID PATIENTS


Posted originally on TrialSite News by doctrumpet on January 23, 2022

Note that views expressed in this opinion article are the writer’s personal views and not necessarily those of TrialSite.

by Michael Goodkin

Dear John,

I hope things with you and the kids are good. Our Zoom meeting with my COVID expert friend and your associates in your law firm 6 months ago was very interesting. He explained the fraud going on multiple fronts that is going on and the failure of the press to report it in large part due to the Trusted News Initiative. It has very likely resulted in millions of unnecessary deaths worldwide, innumerable unnecessary hospitalizations, untold economic damage and led to governments instituting insane lockdown policies and mandatory vaccination.

I’m sorry you didn’t feel there was a strategy you could pursue at that time. You seemed most interested in liability for the hospitals who denied ivermectin to patients who subsequently died.  There will be strong legal strategies in the future. I have now written eight (8) articles on repurposed drugs for Trialsite News plus serve on the advisory committee.Subscribe to the Trialsitenews “Coronavirus” ChannelNo spam – we promise

Peter McCullough, Dr. Robert Malone and several others could be expert witnesses for you in the future if they feel there is a strong case. Dr. Malone, a key early pioneer involved with the emergence of mRNA technology, served as a respectable virologist and government drug development insider. Today he led  a group in Washington to fight for truth and medical freedom. He has 17,000 physicians and researchers who have signed a petition.

Hospital systems continue to refuse to give patients ivermectin when families request it. The patients who win in court usually live. Those who lose in court almost always die. I doubt that there will ever be a large enough study to prove that treating that type of patient with ivermectin works but other data exists as to its benefit as in Uttar Pradesh, India, 240 million where ivermectin has crushed COVID and Brazil where in a town of 223,000, 160,000 were randomized to ivermectin prevention or no treatment. Those who got a low dose of ivermectin about 4 times a month were 44% less likely to get infected, 56% less likely to be hospitalized and 70% less likely to die. The unvaccinated could certainly be helped by ivermectin prevention. Unfortunately, data like this, called observational data, is discounted by those in power in favor of randomized trial data which is at the mercy of the biases of those conducting the studies.

There are four large, randomized trials of ivermectin, all of which gave or are giving one third or less of the proper dose of ivermectin for early treatment of the delta variant. The results of the Together Trial were announced 8/6 as showing “absolutely no benefit” but the actual data showed a borderline statistically significant 9% decrease in admissions and 18% decrease in mortality.

Dr. Edward Mills, affiliated with a program that has received some Bill Gates funding, ran that trial. NIH chose not to study ivermectin until their ACTIV-6 trial started enrolling patients the same time as the Together results were announced.  They decided to go ahead and give patients a lower dose than in Together where ivermectin showed borderline results. By then we had 80% delta. Dr. Pierre Kory found out that delta needed a much higher dose of ivermectin and put it on the FLCCC Alliance website. I made the ACTIV-6 principal investigator and others involved aware of their dosing snafu on 10/18. My email was acknowledged by NIAID deputy director Dr. Cliff Lane who said it would be addressed by the appropriate people. There was a rumor that they considered adding a new arm with appropriate dosing, but they did nothing.

ACTIV-6’s ivermectin data should be ready in about 2 months. Should ivermectin show no benefit they may or may not publicly admit that it was underdosed and it needs a new trial. If they don’t acknowledge it, someone will call out NIH for randomizing patients to placebo or a dose they knew was unlikely to work then doing nothing when they were made aware of their dosing error. An unacceptable ethical failing. I don’t think the principal investigator, Dr. Susanna Naggie from Duke, wants her career ruined.

Meanwhile the COVID-OUT data will come out very soon. They were 3 months into their trial when Together was announced and 5 months into it and 75% subscribed before they knew of the new FLCCC recommendations. They had no more money, something ACTIV-6 can’t claim. Many patients in Brazil in Together had a nasty gamma variant and ivermectin was sold over the counter there so their trial could turn out positive despite using a similar dose. COVID-OUT has alpha, delta, and omicron patients. First, I hope that their study will show positive results. Next, I hope they will admit that the study was underdosed for delta and that patients probably would have done better with a higher dose. It will be interesting what NIH will do if their study is positive. An EUA is unlikely.

I doubt hospital systems will be vulnerable as their position is that the FDA recommends against ivermectin. Despite there being no evidence of toxicity and hospitals not having restricted doctors choices previously, it will be hard to win. Even if you prove the FDA was wrong, you will have to prove that the hospitals  should have known the FDA was wrong. Hospitals have greatly benefitted from COVID financially. They are paid extra for the patients, extra if the patients die and extra for giving them remdesivir which is a lousy drug. They have a financial disincentive to see early treatment instituted widely which would decrease hospitalizations and have used their clout to punish those physicians who speak out against mandates and suppression of early therapies. ENT doctor Mary Bowden was suspended by Houston Methodist for publicly speaking out against vaccine mandates and giving  her 2000 COVID patients successful early treatment. She is suing them to among other things find out about their finances during COVID.   

A better target is pharmacists who will not stock or sell ivermectin. The few who do sell it charge exorbitant prices. They know there is no data showing that pharmacists selling ivermectin have toxicity. They will claim that the FDA recommends against it, and they are doing it to protect the public. These are the same guys who sold as much oxycontin as they could get. They stopped selling  ivermectin because of their fear of the FDA. If ivermectin shows benefit in COVID-OUT they have no leg to stand on. If they still fail to stock and sell it, they will be a target for you. I will keep you informed.

The Wall Street Journal did an article 12/28 in which it chastised the government for not getting fluvoxamine to the public. It’s a generic SSRI. In the Together Trial, the results of which were announced 8/6 and published in The Lancet Global Health 10/27, in 1497 patients, in those who finished the trial, it lowered admissions 32% and deaths 91%. In addition, the sponsor, Steve Kirsch, reported that no one treated with it gets long COVID which is about 20% of those infected.

NIH says the data is insufficient to use a $1 a day drug with 30 years of safety data. Meanwhile Merck’s molnupiravir which may be dangerous and had similar data got emergency use authorization. Dr. Boulware who has done a video for TrialSite News on repurposed drugs, filed an emergency use application for fluvoxamine 12/21 which the FDA which has ignored,

He is running COVID-OUT testing ivermectin and fluvoxamine. Tom Avril of the Philadelphia Inquirer at my request did an article on fluvoxamine Friday.  I’m hoping  Tom will be doing more articles about repurposed drugs. Many newspapers declined to report on it even though it would have helped a lot of people, especially the unvaccinated.

The next drug to go public will be famotidine (Pepcid). A 56 patient randomized trial of famotidine 80 mg 3 times a day vs. placebo will be published in a major journal very soon showing great benefit. There was plenty of reason for NIH to have sponsored a large trial over a year ago. Famotidine blocks H2 receptors on mast cells which normally cause allergies by releasing histamine. The president and head of research for the big allergy/immunology group, AAAAI, 7000 allergists, were very excited about it. They sent my email to the coronavirus task force. 3 weeks later they suddenly turned cold and did nothing. I suspect the worst.

At some point we will have the data to support a claim that the government intentionally unreasonably failed to give emergency use authorization to fluvoxamine, failed to study then sabotaged the study of famotidine and failed to study ivermectin until August 2021 then did everything possible to sabotage it. The government appeared to have sabotaged hydroxychloroquine, but it will be harder to prove. The reason for the government’s actions is because the success of repurposed drugs would have increased vaccine hesitancy and possibly make vaccines unnecessary. Around the world where vaccines are unavailable, repurposed drugs would have made a tremendous difference. Getting damages from the government will be difficult but it could be a fee for service or even a pro bono case for the benefit of COVID infected people all over the world.

The people I deal with only care about getting proper treatment for patients. A bonus would be to get rid of Fauci and assorted dangerous bureaucrats that say they’re pro-public health, yet their behavior indicates something altogether to the contrary.  The public strongly disapproves of the vaccine mandates and associated haphazard public health by bureaucratic impulse,  but Fauci’s irrational exuberance for his own top-down, hubris-driven program will crush the Democrats for many years when it’s exposed.

The press and social media have conspired with the government and drug companies, culminating in the Trusted News Initiative, to censor information different from the party line.  I would think as attorneys you would find the suppression of information by those in power that would greatly decrease tremendous human suffering would be reprehensible and you would want to fight against it.

Think carefully about the true risk-benefit analysis associated with vaccination prior to subjecting your children to the regimen. The risk from COVID for healthy children is very low. Their risk from the vaccine appears to be higher.  That’s why in the Nordic nations for example holds were placed on the Moderna vaccine for young people under 30.

While industry and public health authorities deny this reality, I put forth here that vaccines spread through your body and induce one’s cells to produce spike protein which is not the same as the one the virus has. The spike protein is toxic. So are the lipid nanoparticles used to deliver it. Insurance companies are reporting a 40% increase in all-cause mortality in 2021 for those 18-64 years old. One in 2700 young men is reported to get myocarditis which can shorten their life.  I suspect that if a troponin blood test were done on every patient, that number would be a lot higher.

There have been hundreds of young athletes who died suddenly, far more than in the past. I’m sure the increase in all-cause mortality is multifactorial but I believe that sooner or later some of it will be attributed directly  to the vaccines. 79,000 people in Australia have sued the government for damage from the vaccines. Unfortunately, vaccine makers are indemnified in America, but their executives could face criminal prosecution in the future.

The CDC has said that vaccine induced immunity was better than immunity from natural infection, but most data suggests the opposite. Wednesday the CDC admitted that since the delta variant, natural immunity is significantly better. The mandates which include mandating vaccination of the 50% of the country previously infected whose immunity is better than those who are vaccinated are absurd. The NIH/Biden logic is that if 100% of the country is vaccinated. we will have herd immunity. It is true that if 100% were vaccinated, fewer would be in the hospital and the vaccinated would be less likely to be infected by the unvaccinated but with these vaccines, the vaccinated people will always spread the virus to each other.

The Biden/NIH logic further goes that the only way to make sure that there is no one left unvaccinated is to vaccinate everyone whether they need it or not. Asking people for proof of previous infection has not been considered.  Vaccines have toxicity as evidenced, despite denials by the government,  by the 900,000 reports on VAERS, the vaccine adverse event reporting system which is a gross underestimate of the problems caused by the vaccines. Many people who have had COVID fret that exposure to the vaccine only gives them risk and not surprisingly resist.  Drug companies and the government are pushing the idea of needing a new shot every 3-4 months for life. It’s not working in Israel. No one has any idea what problems lifelong shots would cause.   After All this has never been studied. What happened to the Declaration of Helsinki and good clinical practices?

I just watched Alex Witt and a guest on MSNBC covering Stop the Mandates in Washington DC. I hate Trump and love MSNBC during the election but every word they said today was false. She knows no science and sounds like a Fauci/Biden/ lobbyist. Her expert sounded like he worked for Pfizer. CNN wasn’t as bad but said the rally was about people who don’t trust the government. I’m not sure the press will ever tell people the truth about repurposed drugs even if it is conclusively shown that the government healthcare agencies deliberately tanked repurposed drugs that would have saved hundreds of thousands of lives. I know your law firm has mostly Democrats. I hope that if I come to you with a strong, profitable case that will benefit COVID patients but hurt those that have seemingly conspired to thwart economically repurposed drugs at every turn, your law firm will be willing to take it on.  Life is too short not to do the right thing. 

Biden Withdraws Vaccine Mandate & the Collapse of the Rule of Law


Armstrong Economics Blog/Rule of Law Re-Posted Jan 26, 2022 by Martin Armstrong

This is what is WRONG with our rule of law. The Supreme Court held before that the Constitution is NEGATIVE, not positive back in 1980. But that ruling has been largely ignored. In addition, the Supreme Court has held that there is a limitation to the Judicial Power that there must be a “case or controversy” according to Article III. That interpretation is what is destroying the United States. Biden and Congress can may any damn law they want. They can literally decree that you must kill your firstborn on an altar before the White House and pray to Schwab, Gates, and Soros when you make that sacrifice. Nobody would have “standing” to run to the Supreme Court to say this is unconstitutional and completely nuts.

The ONLY person who would have “standing” to challenge this crazy decree is someone they try to prosecute for not sacrificing their firstborn. Therein lies our demise of the United States. They get to do whatever they want. It is our obligation to take them to court and say this is unconstitutional. In the meantime, they inflict all kinds of chaos and harm and this is why the United States is doomed.

Here is the Fifth Amendment. It is drafted in a NEGATIVE context that “no person shall be held” yet if you speak, they immediately claim you waived your right to remain silent but it is NOT YOUR RIGHT, it is a restraint upon the power of government.

To all the lawyers who read this blog, this is why I did not wish to join your field. I probably would have spent my life in prison on criminal contempt because I would have rebelled constantly. You cannot CONSTRUCTIVE AMEND the Constitution by waiving a pretend right you do not have bestowing power of a ruthless tyrant upon the government. That defeats even Equal Protection of the Law for if someone remains silent and someone who speaks, so the government must respect the liberty of the first but not the second.

Biden had no authority under the Constitution whatsoever to order OSHA to mandate vaccines. Some people cannot even take a flu shot for they get violently sick with any vaccine. Do they have no right to the freedom of their own person? Where in the Constitution is NEGATIVE does the government have any POSITIVE power to wipe out any individual’s liberty? They have the power to regulate commerce – not health!

The first legal interpretation of the scope of the Commerce Clause came down from the Supreme Court in 1824 in the case of Gibbons v. Ogden. That was the first major expansion of the powers of the federal government. The Court held that Congress could use the Commerce Clause to enact laws regulating both interstate and intrastate trade. This was then followed by the 1905 ruling in Swift and Company v. United States, where the Court held that Congress could apply the Commerce Clause in regulating the practices of local businesses—intrastate commerce—ONLY if those local business practices were in some way a part of a “current” or stream of commerce that also involved the movement of goods between states. That did not have anything to do with the health of its employees.Then in 1937, the ruling in NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp, broadened the reach of the Commerce Clause holding that any local business activity could be defined as “commerce” as long as it had or was likely to have a “substantial economic effect” on interstate commerce. This interpretation was done for the Roosevelt socialist agenda where Congress gained the power to enact laws that even regulated local firearms dealers for they were concerned about revolution and civil unrest. As long as the guns were manufactured outside of the state where the business operated then it was involving interstate commerce.Congress used this Socialist interpretation to seize power over virtually everything. Not until 1995 did the Court finally narrow that wild interpretation of commerce with its ruling in the case of United States v. Lopez. In that decision, the Court struck down parts of the federal Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990, finding that the act of possessing a firearm is not an economic activity.Getting the flu or any disease is also NOT economic activity. My view of Biden’s attempt to mandate vaccines was totally unconstitutional. The power of government is defined in Article I. Here we have the express powers granted. Congress does not have the power to create laws that are outside of these restraints upon power.WHEN will someone challenge this casual execution of the Constitution where people truly have no rights, it is the government that has no such claimed powers. The First Amendment was violated by every governor who used COVID to shut down churches. It expressly states:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.There is no exception to the First Amendment. Big Tech claims they are not the government so they can regulate our right to speak. Sorry, but they obtain a license to be in business, and as such, they cannot operate without that authority as such paying lobby fees links them to the government and they are acting under the Color of Law and this is sanctioned by the government to deny our free speech. “Congress shall mar no law” also means they cannot grant them immunity.The passage of the Constitution was NOT unanimous. Only 39 delegated voted for it out of 70 so it passed on a bare majority vote. They voted against it, including Patrick Henry, because there was no Bill of Rights. I do not believe that the United States will survive for the rule of law is collapsing. The Biden administration is doing whatever they want, and hopes they get it through with the Supreme Court cowering in fear of their attempt at stacking the Court to rule only in their favor. That will be the end of the United States!


Section 8.

The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States; but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

To borrow money on the credit of the United States;

To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes;

To establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States;

To coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures;

To provide for the punishment of counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States;

To establish post offices and post roads;

To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries;

To constitute tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court;

To define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the law of nations;

To declare war, grant letters of marque and reprisal, and make rules concerning captures on land and water;

To raise and support armies, but no appropriation of money to that use shall be for a longer term than two years;

To provide and maintain a navy;

To make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces;

To provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States, reserving to the states respectively, the appointment of the officers, and the authority of training the militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular states, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the legislature of the state in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings;–And

To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.

Section 9.

The migration or importation of such persons as any of the states now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a tax or duty may be imposed on such importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each person.

The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.

No bill of attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

No capitation, or other direct, tax shall be laid, unless in proportion to the census or enumeration herein before directed to be taken.

No tax or duty shall be laid on articles exported from any state.

No preference shall be given by any regulation of commerce or revenue to the ports of one state over those of another: nor shall vessels bound to, or from, one state, be obliged to enter, clear or pay duties in another.

No money shall be drawn from the treasury, but in consequence of appropriations made by law; and a regular statement and account of receipts and expenditures of all public money shall be published from time to time.

No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.

Section 10.

No state shall enter into any treaty, alliance, or confederation; grant letters of marque and reprisal; coin money; emit bills of credit; make anything but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts; pass any bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law impairing the obligation of contracts, or grant any title of nobility.

No state shall, without the consent of the Congress, lay any imposts or duties on imports or exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it’s inspection laws: and the net produce of all duties and imposts, laid by any state on imports or exports, shall be for the use of the treasury of the United States; and all such laws shall be subject to the revision and control of the Congress.

No state shall, without the consent of Congress, lay any duty of tonnage, keep troops, or ships of war in time of peace, enter into any agreement or compact with another state, or with a foreign power, or engage in war, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent danger as will not admit of delay.

Political Moves, OSHA Removes Worker Vaccine Mandate Rule Effective Tomorrow Claiming It Was Only a Suggestion


Posted originally on the conservative tree house on January 25, 2022 | Sundance | 162 Comments

Even in a defeat from the United States Supreme Court, the political weasels running the U.S. Dept of Labor cannot reverse their position without lying and obfuscating.

The U.S. Dept of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) announces their withdrawal of the employee vaccine mandate that was ruled unconstitutional by the United States Supreme Court. [pdf HERE]   However, note how they change the prior enforcement order from a “mandate” to a mere suggestion: “strongly encouraging vaccination.”

(pdf link)

The effective date of the reversal is tomorrow, January 26, 2022.  However, in reversing their position notice how OSHA attempts to rewrite history and claim they were only “strongly encouraging vaccination.”

The institutions of our government are corrupt top to bottom with the cancer of metastatic political filth.

The Canadian Government Announce They Will Not Budge on Vaccine Mandate for Truckers


Posted originally on the conservative tree house on January 25, 2022 | Sundance | 414 Comments

Despite a request from Wall Street multinational business groups impacted by the threat from the truckers, the administration of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced they will not relent in their effort to force vaccinations on unwilling truck drivers.

According to Canadian media, the efforts of the insignificant proles behind the big rig steering wheels are easily dispatched annoyances when contrast against the unlimited power of the federal government.

The truck drivers will kneel before the mighty power of the administrative state, or the truckers will be ignored; it matters not.  The families of Canadian politicians can have their goods delivered from anywhere with taxpayer funds. The empty stores and supply chain disruptions will not be permitted to affect the powdered class.

CANADA – The federal government says it will not back down on its vaccination rule for cross-border truckers despite entrenched opposition from some drivers and groups claiming to represent their interests.

In a joint media statement released today, Transport Minister Omar Alghabra, Labour Minister Seamus O’Regan, Employment Minister Carla Qualtrough and Stephen Laskowski, the president of the Canadian Trucking Alliance (CTA), said COVID-19 vaccines are the “most effective tool to reduce the risk of COVID-19” and protect public health.

In an interview with CBC’s Power & Politics, Alghabra said the government is not interested in alternatives like rapid testing for unvaccinated truckers. He said truckers and the wider industry have had months to prepare for the new regulations and drivers must now get the shot or stop driving over the border. (read more)

Meanwhile the GoFundMe effort to support the trucker pushback against government has now reached $4.7 million.

Updates on the travel and details are AVAILABLE HERE.

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis Responds to Biden Administration Effort to Block COVID Treatments and Kill Floridians


Posted originally on the conservative tree house on January 25, 2022 | Sundance | 516 Comments

Earlier today Florida Governor Ron DeSantis responded to the Biden administration’s political effort to stop Floridians from receiving COVID-19 treatment. [Press Release Here] …”the appointments for more than 2,000 Floridians to receive this treatment were canceled on January 25, 2022, alone”…

Late yesterday evening, without notice, the Biden FDA blocked monoclonal antibody treatments by revoking the emergency use authorization for the therapeutic.  Today thousands of Floridians wake up to hear they are no longer eligible for treatment.  Florida Governor Ron DeSantis is furious.  WATCH:

FLORIDA – Governor Ron DeSantis is demanding the Biden Administration reverse its sudden and reckless decision to revoke emergency use authorization (EUA) for Regeneron and Eli Lilly monoclonal antibody treatments. This abrupt and unilateral action by the Biden Administration will prevent access to lifesaving treatments for Floridians and Americans.

“Without a shred of clinical data to support this action, Biden has forced trained medical professionals to choose between treating their patients or breaking the law,” said Governor Ron DeSantis. “This indefensible edict takes treatment out of the hands of medical professionals and will cost some Americans their lives. There are real-world implications to Biden’s medical authoritarianism – Americans’ access to treatments is now subject to the whims of a failing president.”

“Rather than giving Americans the option for various COVID treatments, the FDA and the Biden Administration issued their royal decree, taking away the very thing that is proven to reduce hospitalizations and save lives,” said Lieutenant Governor Jeanette Nuñez. “Monoclonal antibody treatments like Regeneron have had a positive impact for thousands of Floridians. For the CDC and FDA, which have been consistently inconsistent throughout the entire pandemic, to restrict treatment does nothing but put individuals at risk.”

“In our field of medicine, when someone comes to you seeking a treatment that could save their life, it is essential to have treatment options to ensure health care providers can make the best decisions for their patients,” said Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo. “The Federal Government has failed to adequately provide the United States with adequate outpatient treatment options for COVID-19. Now, they are scrambling to cover up a failure to deliver on a promise to ‘shut down the virus.’”

As a result of this abrupt and clinically unsupported action, the appointments for more than 2,000 Floridians to receive this treatment were canceled on January 25, 2022, alone. This decision was made solely by Biden’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) without advance warning to states or health providers and without clinical data to support the decision. The deliberate decision by the Biden Administration to make this announcement effective immediately, through a press release, actively prevents states and health care providers from making real-time operational decisions that save lives.

Over the course of the past two years, scientists and researchers across the nation have worked hard to bring us treatments that are both safe and effective. One of these treatments has been monoclonal antibodies. This treatment has saved thousands of lives in Florida and across our nation. (LINK)