Can Kamala Take the Presidency Without an Election?


Posted originally on Oct 8, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

2024 election

Let me begin with a shocking statement that people generally do not know. Read the Constitution and the Bill of Rights; you will not find any mention of a right to vote. Surprisingly, nowhere in the original text will you find any mention that U.S. citizens have a right to vote. All the ideas of having a right to vote in our pretend Democracy stems from amendments adopted following the U.S. Civil War and legislation passed during the civil rights movement of the 1960s. So, Constitutionally, this leaves even a grey area that the Democrats are trying to drive the election through, claiming there is nothing in the Constitution regarding any right to vote whatsoever. This has led to some suggesting that as President, Biden can issue an executive order allowing all RESIDENTS the right to vote.

I received a phone call asking my opinion:

“Could the election be positioned?”

22nd_Amendment_U.S._Constitution_US_Law_LII_Legal_Information_Institute

Actually, the election can be delayed/postponed but not postponed indefinitely. The ONLY hard deadline spelled out in the Constitution is the END of a president’s term and a vice president’s term on January 20th of the year following a general election. The deadline is restated in the 22nd Amendment. Keep in mind that FDR served more than two terms. That was the purpose of this Amendment.

The Constitution requires that a group of electors, commonly called the Electoral College, choose the next president without mentioning the people voting. If a majority of electors fails to agree on a winner, Congress picks the winner in continental elections held within Congress under the terms of the 12th Amendment. It was the election of 1824 when Andrew Jackson won the most popular votes but the election ended up in the House. The 12th Amendment only stated that the House selects the president by majority with no reference to a candidate who had the most popular or electoral votes should become president. Once again, we can see that the people’s choice does not really matter.

In 1824, the Federalist had collapsed. The Democratic-Republican Party had won six consecutive presidential elections and was the only national political party. It was the fact that this election was decided by Congress that resulted in the split of that party into the Democrats vs the Republicans (South vs North).

Let’s look at Article II, Section 2. It clearly states that “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors.” There is no mention of an individual right to vote anywhere in the original Constitution.

Then, Article II, Section 1 delegates the Electoral College deadlines to Congress: “The Congress may determine the Time of chusing [original spelling] the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States.”

The Constitution’s 20th Amendment also requires the president and vice president to end their terms of office on January 20 at noon in the year following the general election.

“The terms of the President and Vice President shall end at noon on the 20th day of January,”

However, Congress controls by statute when electoral votes are counted at the states and at Congress. The statute read that “the electors of President and Vice President of each State shall meet and give their votes on the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December next following their appointment at such place in each State as the legislature of such State shall direct.”

The states must send their electoral votes to Congress by late December. Suppose electoral votes are NOT received by the fourth Wednesday in December. In that case, the President of the Senate or the Archivist of the United States can use “the most expeditious method available” to get the votes sent to Congress. The electoral votes received by Congress are then counted in a joint session at 1 p.m. on January 6. If a presidential or vice presidential candidate does not receive a majority of the electoral votes, the House selects the next president, and the Senate selects the next vice president.

vote_america_800_clr_9480

Post-Civil War states used public elections to pick the winners of electoral votes in presidential elections. This is NOT A Constitutional REQUIREMENT! For EXAMPLE, Maine and Nebraska divide their electoral votes among districts. Therefore, we do NOT find any standardized requirement to empower people to vote. Each state legislature has a process for selecting the slate of electors that represents a candidate. The states and political parties previously worked together on the presidential primary process. But this year, the Democrats denied the people to have any right to vote for a possible alternative to Biden.

In some cases, disputes about that process are settled by the courts, the most notable example being the Supreme Court’s ruling in Bush v. Gore in December 2000. To be clear, a state under its own laws could postpone the general election date that results in the selection of electors. At least 45 states have statutes that deal with election-day emergencies.

What remains clear is that only the states and Congress can delay that part of the election process. Some states allow the Governor to postpone an election during emergencies, and that could certainly be a domestic terrorist attack staged to accomplish that or the start of World War III, where neither the Constitution nor Congress provides any similar power to the President or other federal officials to change this date outside of Congress’s regular legislative process.

Congress also has the power to change the various statutes to alter the date for an election and the date electoral votes are to be received in Washington and counted in Congress. Such changes would require the consent of the House and the Senate and would be extraordinary since it would require the agreement of the majority in both houses. Congress could even delegate some of its electoral process powers to the Executive Branch in emergencies. That would allow Biden even to pull off an executive order. The fear is that Biden already has the executive power to allow aliens to vote.

All of this taken into account, there is no power to actually delay elections without a deadline. There is no such power to postpone elections indefinitely since the Constitution also requires that Members of the House of Representatives shall be chosen ‘every second year’ according to Article I, Section 2, and Senators to be chosen for terms of ‘six years’ under the 17th Amendment.

In the absence of a clear winner of the presidential election on January 20, the Constitution does allow the Speaker of the House to serve as Acting President. That would end up as a Republican. The 20th Amendment requires that the duly elected president and vice president MUST assume their positions at some point. However, Congress may elect a President and Vice President if they are unqualified to take those positions.

The Justice Department filed a suit against Alabama, claiming that the voter roll purge announcement took place 84 days before the November 5 election and violated the National Voter Registration Act. This could upend the election, and then a host of lawsuits involving alien voting will be challenged nationwide. That guarantees that the 2024 election will end up in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court would have to rule on whether aliens can vote in the U.S. elections.

Loophole

OK, we have looked at the various requirements and established that (1) you have no Constitutional Right to Vote, and (2) there is no uniform requirement that every state carries out some standardized election procedure. We also know that there are some ways that states could mess up and delay the federal election. There could even be a scenario where the election occurs in Congress without the Electoral College or the people.

VidHOWEVER, What if Biden resigns on January 19th and Kamal becomes President? The 22nd Amendment would apply if Kamala “acted” as president for over two years. If that would occur, then the Speaker of the House would not assume the acting role as President. All of this confusion is being created for the sole purpose of retaining the power of the Neocons. They do not care about the country, not about the people. This is only about their victory; to them, it is like a football game, and their team has to win.

The 2020_Coup

They cleverly used COVID and instigated the January 6th riot to prevent a count of state votes where a challenge was to be made before the entire Congress. The electoral votes received by Congress will be counted in a joint session at 1 p.m., and Pelosi declared an emergency rule to prevent any challenge to a state’s vote. Then she imposed COVID Rules restricting the maximum number of people on the floor to 53. Thus, Pelosi secured the presidency for Biden, and nobody understood what they did. They got away with it in 2020, and they will pull a fast one in 2024.

Ep. 3468a – The Move From The [CB] Currency To An Alternative Currency Can Be Done


Posted originally on Rumble By X 22 Report on: Oct 06, 2024 at 8:00 pm EST

Why the EU Wants War


Posted originally on Oct 7, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

EU Parliament Building

The European leaders are pushing for war with Russia because, economically, they are failing. Those in the highest offices of the European Union faced the decline and fall of their dream – one European government that had been attempted many times before, from Charlemagne to Hitler and Napoleon. As I have written before, they came to me when they were creating this project since we were the currency specialists. They attended, taking the entire back row of our London World Economic Conference.

I warned them back then that the euro would NEVER displace the dollar unless they consolidated the national debts of Europe. I was told that was impossible and they just had to get the euro through and then worry about the debts later. I explained that capital would merely trade one member’s bond against another, the same as in currencies. That was in 1998, and they never addressed the debt issue that is now escalating into a crisis.

1 Kohl Dictator

It was Chancellor Kohl who blocked the debt consolidation. He admitted he acted as a dictator and took Germany into the euro, denying the German people any right to vote because he knew he would have lost the vote seven to three. Because of that decision, the euro could never replace the dollar, and an institutional investor still had to compare one member state against another. The volatility once in the foreign exchange markets was merely transferred to the individual bond markets.

The theory behind creating the EU Parliament was that one government would end European wars. Now, the EU is looking for a war to pretend the economic demise of Europe was not because of their gross mismanagement and the failure to design the euro properly. Also, never in history has centralized control succeeded. In fact, this idea of a one-size-fits-all approach has always ended in civil war, for it is tearing the United States apart at the seams as well, just as it did with Communism in Russia and China.

This idea of the EU and a centralized dictatorial government is rapidly becoming ungovernable. Even at a recent debate in Berlin, a German voter criticized Chancellor Olaf Scholz, pointing out that Germany’s government is unable to govern as its ministers are bickering like children fighting over the same toy. The shocking response from Scholz conceded the point. “The truth is: You are right, but what would be your solution? I mean, I’m asking for a friend.”

EU_Takes_Hungary_to_Top_Court_Over_Orban_s_Sovereignty_Law_Bloomberg

The EU is trying to create dictatorial power from Brussels and is taking Hungary to court over what it views as its controversial sovereignty-protection legislation. The EU demands that Hungary do as it commands. This tension always emerges and leads to civil wars and separatist movements. We will see the breakup of the EU because this centralized control always fails.

Croatia and Hungary oppose NATO’s rush to war, which has no viable purpose without creating war. The Eastern Blocks are resisting war, for they know Ukraine very well and are not trustworthy in the least. Ukrainians see themselves as superior and engage in ethnic cleansing of not just Russians but Jews and Polish as well. They were so brutal that even the German Nazis were horrified. Ukrainians cut the babies out of pregnant women and sowed in a live cat.

The Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico has also spoken out against Ukraine’s membership in NATO. He reminded that membership must be ratified by all members. No more slick side deals. Indeed, nobody can join NATO if they are at war, for that would invoke Article 6 and direct all to join the fight. Ukraine’s close neighbors do not trust Ukraine. They were the collaborators of Hitler and practiced ethnic cleansing. He said:

“As long as I am the prime minister of the Slovak Republic, I will lead the deputies over whom I have political control as the head of the party to never agree to Ukraine’s membership in NATO.

The EU is crumbling from within, and as that happens, it is becoming highly authoritarian. Turkey is pretending to be in accord with NATO yet doing a balancing act between Russia and NATO. Will they actually send troops to invade Russia when NATO gives the green light for World War III? That remains to be seen because it will cost Turkey its dream of resurrecting the Ottoman Empire. The rest of the Arab world will turn against Turkey.

The EU has been in the grips of a deepening crisis that began with climate change and unleashed a cost-of-living crisis, a housing crisis, a migration crisis, and a collapsing economic growth. This has been accelerated by the decline since the turn in the ECM in May 2024. This has furthered a political crisis, and the right has faced a significant challenge. The Freedom Party won the Austrian elections with 30% of the vote. This combined threatens the fragile EU cohesion that has promoted the WOKE agenda.

The EU is using the excuse of Hungary’s veto to supply Ukraine with money to destroy Russia to steal 50 billion of frozen Russian assets to fund themselves. Only 5% of that money will go to Ukraine to circumvent Hungary’s veto. The EU is desperate for money, and they view their conquest of Russia as a way to refill the treasury.

On the international front, the EU continues to face the escalation of war against Russia, using Ukraine as the vanguard. Zelensky’s invasion of Russia directly has been orchestrated in hopes of forcing Russia to attack anything they can justify World War III. NATO is scheming to gather $100 billion to keep up the conquest of Russia. Our models warn that WWIII will unfold by 2025, and the destruction of NATO is in the cards by 2027.

Russia the War Criminal
Zelensky Meloni
Zelensky Stamer

Please make no mistake about it. Zelensky’s “Victory Plan” is all about the destruction of Russia. He presents Russia as a War Criminal, and NATO is in favor of letting him use long-range missiles to attack even the Kremlin. NATO wants Russia to respond and attack anything in NATO so they can invoke Article 5 and turn this into World War III. Let’s get real. All of these leaders cheering on war couldn’t win a bar fight but cheer others dying for their ambitions.

I will no longer revisit Europe. I saw the Colosseum for the last time. It will not be standing in the years ahead. Like the fall of Rome and the subsequent Dark Age (5th–10th centuries), Europe’s knowledge and history will be lost again. Next year, 2025, will start the 6th wave of 309.6 years from the fall of Rome in 476AD.

Zelensky has now publicly declared this is really World War III, stating that to guarantee Ukraine lasting peace and security, there will be no trade of sovereignty or territories. He has effectively said that all the ethnic Russians in Ukraine are no longer allowed to retain their natural language or their religion. This is a total war against Russia with no compromise of peace absent the destruction of Russia or Europe, whichever comes first.

Karen Bailey-Chapman Breaks Down The Harris Campaign’s Radical Stance On Electric Vehicle’s


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Oct 05, 2024 at 07:00 pm EST

Julian Assange Gives Testimony to Council of Europe in Strasbourg, France – VIDEO


Posted originally on Armstrong Economics on: May 27, 2024 at 6:30 pm EST October 4, 2024 | Sundance

Australian WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange gives an address to the Council of Europe in Strasbourg, France, on Tuesday — his first public remarks since he was released from prison. Assange has been giving testimony to the Parliamentary Assembly, which includes parliamentarians from 46 European countries, on his detention and conviction and their effects on human rights.

As noted by Chase Freedom: “In his first public appearance since gaining his freedom after 14 years of torment, Julian Assange call Mike Pompeo and Bill Barr “Wolves in MAGA hats” and he’s 100% correct.”  WATCH:

.

President Trump Interview With Dave Ramsey – The Economic Roadmap to Clean Up Biden/Harris Mess


Posted originally on the CTH on October 3, 2024 | Sundance

President Trump sat down with Dave Ramsey to discuss specific economic drivers that will jump start the U.S. economy in 2025.

Beginning with an immediate shift in energy policy, President Trump sets the aggregate goal to reduce overall energy prices by 50% in the first year. The drop in energy price then begins to reverberate throughout all facets of the economy as the cost of goods sold, distributed and warehoused immediately lowers.  This directly starts to lower the end price of goods.

President Trump then proposes a drop of the corporate tax rate from 21 percent to 15 percent. However, in order for corporations and manufacturers to get the lowered rate, they MUST produce their product INSIDE the USA.  The tax drop will only apply to companies who produce goods domestically from USA origins.  This approach further bolsters employment and wages as the companies shift operations to the USA to gain the favorable rate.

Dropping overall energy prices, targeting tariffs on strategic sectors, decreasing regulations, increasing domestic production, creating jobs, becoming less reliant on foreign goods and enhancing the Gross Domestic Product, directly expands the economy and provides more revenue for government operations.  This is the MAGAnomic success formula that allows Social Security to survive without change.

.

Around 13:30 of the interview, Ramsey talks about the culture of excellence that exists within the Trump organization.  President Trump notes that Eric Trump currently runs the organization and talks about one of the key secrets to their success, ‘promotion from within’.

Many Main Street titans will agree. Selecting excellence within the organization for direct advancement to leadership is the single biggest commonality of organizations who maintain excellent operations.  In an era where people jump jobs, in a privately owned company – the ability to promote the best from within ensures long-term employment.

At 20:42, Dave Ramsey asks about President Trump returning to Butler, Pennsylvania to continue the rally interrupted by an assassination attempt. The Butler rally is scheduled for Saturday, October 5th.

Ben Bergquam Reporting Live From Springfield, Ohio


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Oct 02, 2024 at 07:00 pm EST

Illegal Migration to Italy Falls 64%


Posted originally on Oct 3, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

Refugees Just Men

The globalists condemned Italy’s Giorgia Meloni for promising to curb immigration if elected. As with Donald Trump, she was called a racist for wanting to secure her nation’s borders. Italy was facing an all-out invasion by land and sea under relaxed European Union edicts that permitted open borders. Now, under Meloni, illegal immigration has dropped 64% in the past year.

Over 150,000 migrants arrived in Italy by boat in 2023, nearly doubling the new arrivals seen in 2022. Instead of building shelters to house migrants with taxpayer funds, Meloni sought to build detention centers. Centri di Permanenza per il Rimpatrio (CPRs) or Repatriation Centers were extremely controversial but effective. Thousands of migrants were detained and deported if their application for asylum was denied. Word traveled that conditions in these centers were less than desirable, making Italy itself less desirable for would-be intruders.

MeloniVictory

Meloni hosted a conference last July, inviting 20 nations to participate, including EU officials and North African leaders. As with politics, there is always a pay-to-play bargain. Italy, along with the EU, agreed to provide Tunisia funding if they worked to control the outpouring of people from their country. Italy agreed to help the Libyan government in Tripoli and helped their coastguard learn tactics to deter migration. Deals were made with North African nations that benefitted each country. The Mattei Plan launched nine projects across six African countries in exchange for their participation in fighting illegal immigration to Italy. Although it came at a cost, the price was far less than Italy would have paid to house endless newcomers.

Then there was the Naval blockade proposal whereby Meloni wanted the Mediterranean secured. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen only agreed to offer Meloni support when she realized that migrants were using Italy as a starting point to enter other European nations.

There is no need for open borders. World leaders do have the ability to act if they choose to do so. The United States, Canada, the UK, and elsewhere in Europe are witnessing a deliberate and calculated invasion of their borders. It begins with the rhetoric that illegal trespassing will not be tolerated, and ends with actions that show the world their threats are not baseless. A decrease in 64% is quite significant and proves that anti-immigration policies are extremely effective.

Canada’s Birth Rate Plummets


Posted originally on Oct 3, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

Crying

For the second consecutive year, fewer women are giving in birth in Canada. The country now has a birth rate of 1.26 children per woman, with some provinces like British Columbia reporting a rate of only 1 child per woman. Yet, the number of children remained consistent year-over-year at 350,000, although there was a 5% decline in births from 2021 to 2022. The problem lies in fewer women of childbearing age opting to have children amid the terrible economic conditions.

“Canada has now joined the group of “lowest-low” fertility countries, including South Korea, Spain, Italy and Japan, with 1.3 children per woman or less. In comparison, the total fertility rate for the United States was 1.62 per woman in 2023,” Statistics Canada said in its press release.

More women are waiting until later in life to have children. Gone are the days when young couples could have families and rely on one income for support. Both the mother and father must be financially stable to responsibly bring life into this world. Over 26.5% of mothers in 2023 were over the age of 35 but that figure was only 10.7% twenty years ago. Unfortunately, this has increased the rate of premature births, which has reached a 50-year high.

On the other hand, Canada’s population reached an all-time high this year. Canada’s population surpassed 41 million, but it is not due to new births. Statistics Canada professed that the population rose 0.6% or 242,673 people from Q1 to Q2, standing at 41,012.563 as of April 2024. The nation rose by 1.27 from 2022 to 2023 or a 3.2%. Nearly all population growth (99.3%; 240,955 people) were solely attributed to migrants arriving in Canada.

We are witnessing population replacement at play. Birth rates are declining across developed nations among the citizens who can no longer afford to expand their families. On the other hand, these nations opened their borders and provided free shelter, healthcare, etc., to migrants who are comfortably expanding their families. We are witnessing a shift in society as the current citizens are being phased out and replaced by newcomers.

Bukele Defends El Salvador’s Gang Reforms


Posted originally on Oct 2, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

The United Nations would like the world to adhere to its lax crime laws. Generate civil unrest to destabilize nations to create a need for order, a New World Order, that will be more powerful and effective than the government. El Salvador’s Nayib Bukele began an anti-gang crusade when he entered office. Affiliated with a gang? Straight to prison.

Now, the self-proclaimed humanitarians at the Untied Nations called Bukele’s crusade extreme and demanded that he loosen his laws. “Some say that we have imprisoned thousands, but the reality is that we have freed millions. Now it is the good guys who live free, without fear, with their freedoms and human rights fully respected,” Bukele said to the counsel.

Over 82,000 gang members were arrested. Sadly, those who were not arrested fled to open border nations like the United States where they will not be deported because they are seeking asylum for their crimes. Donald Trump accurately said that declining crime in South America directly correlated to the rising crime we see in the United States.

But, it is the duty of each leader to put his or her country first. “We made our nation that was the homicide capital of the world, the safest country in the entire Western Hemisphere . It was the greatest challenge that our nation has overcome,” he added. The governor affirmed that El Salvador used to be the “most violent country in the world without war or the country of the maras” (gangs), but this changed with his crusade.” The president proudly noted that he has returned the streets of El Salvador back to the people.

Again, El Salvador cannot prevent the exodus of criminals from its border that are surging into the United States. Bukele would have had those criminals imprisoned, but Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have openly welcomed into America. The blatant corruption has been noted by everyone.

“In El Salvador we do not imprison our opposition, we do not censor opinions, we do not confiscate property of those who think differently, we do not arrest people for their expressing ideas,” the president said as a direct criticism to the Build Back Better nations that are openly silencing and arresting any politician who dares speak out against the Great Reset and New World Order agendas.

The nations with leaders brave enough to go against the global cabal are excelling. We cannot be angered by leaders who uphold the integrity of their office and put their own people and domestic policy first and foremost.