Comey Delivers Scathing Rebuke of Hillary But Says No Indictment


Comey-James FBI-Portrait

To indict someone, the criteria is supposed to be “intent.” Comey has used that to pretend there is no evidence that Hillary “intentionally” erased anything. Comey also stated that Hillary’s lawyers erased her emails using a keyword search program and they did not “read” the emails. He added that he would not recommend charges against Hillary or her aides.

“Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information,” Comey declared.

It was Comey who indicted Frank Quattrone for claiming he instructed his people to erase emails in his technology-industry banking group at Credit Suisse Group’s Credit Suisse First Boston, based upon a single email that read “clean up those files” in December 2000. That was more than enough for his “intent” requirement to obstruct justice. This further illustrates the double standard of justice for them vs. us.

Comey has said that he could not find anyone else who had been prosecuted for such a thing, but then added after clearing Hillary that this is not to say everyone in the government can do this or that they would not prosecute someone else for the same thing. Comey said,“[O]ur judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.”

Comey presented a scathing rebuke of Hillary’s conduct that anyone else would have certainly been indicted for. For Obama to have announced in advance he would campaign for Hillary, it was clear that this was a cover-up and he knew the results before today. For Comey to say, “Although we did not find clear evidence [of any intentional misconduct] there is evidence that they were extremely careless of very sensitive, highly classified information.” It is the jury’s role to determine if there is any evidence and the case should have been presented for a Grand Jury to decide if she should have been indicted. That, of course, is off limits as well.

Comey went on to all but acknowledge that Russia hacked Hillary’s emails:

“With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.”

For Comey to claim neither the Department of Justice nor the White House knew what he was going to announce, seriously undermines his trustworthiness in this matter. Of course, Obama knew or he would not have scheduled to campaign for Hillary since, if indicted, she would have had to be on bail to stay out of jail to even campaign. This is by no means credible. But nobody would have expected Hillary to be indicted when the Democrats control the executive branch. Had Hillary been indicted, she could not have run for office, for even that statute says such a person would be disqualified for such an office. The entire election would have been a fiasco and the Democratic Party would have collapsed. This is what Bernie was holding out for and why he had his talk with Obama who informed him forget it — there would be no indictment for Hillary.

“From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent,” Comey said.

Then, Comey contradicted Lynch in making it clear that the final decision was her’s: “As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case.”

TR01072002 - No Criminal Description
 James Comey was the chief prosecutor in the Southern District of New York between 2003 and 2005. He had no problem keeping me in Federal Prison on contempt of court without any charges, indictment, or a civil complaint describing any crime whatsoever that they even admitted openly in court. There were never any charges or complaint filed, and they publicly stated, “[T]here is no description of criminal liability.” Yet, Comey allowed me to be held in prison, entirely arbitrarily, with absolutely nothing whatsoever; Comey completely violated my civil rights, those of my family, and all 240 employees. So he is not someone who upholds the Constitution when it goes against government or the banks. As they say, the Department of Justice is really “Just Us” in reality. He has proven that once again.

HSBC Gag Cover

Comey also allowed a LIFETIME GAG ORDER on me to prevent me from providing any assistance to my clients in Japan to sue the bankers. Now the State Department has asked for a two-year stay in turning over any of Hillary’s emails. Why  would they do that if there is nothing criminal? This only proves that this is a cover-up, as always, because the Democratic Party cannot allow Hillary to go down for they would lose everything. Sorry, but Comey has a track record of defending the banks even when they stole $1 billion and pleaded criminally guilty before having to pay them back. He kept me in prison on contempt to turn over assets for a “possible” restitution, but when I got into the Supreme Court, I was released and no such charges were ever filed nor did I ever have any restitution. They then tried to prevent “The Forecaster” from being shown in the USA.

So much for any honesty from the Department of Justice. It is the Department of “Just Us,” as they say.

Sarah Palin: “rise up and tear down this tyrannical system”…


The GOPe and the DNC will do anything to keep one of their own in the White House and Hillary is the preferred choice no matter what she has done in the past; the Clinton’s are American Royalty and must be kept in or as close to the reigns of power as possible. The Washington Cartel as Ted class them is only concerned about one think and that is to acquire as much money and power as possible — and nothing will stand in there way and for sure not the law!

FBI Director James Comey Full Press Conference Outlining Clinton Email Investigation (video)…


To be convicted of improper handling of classified material does not require “INTENT” and since it is all but certain that she was hacked that means the official plans of the US were known to those that shouldn’t know them. This proves beyond any doubt that she cannot be trusted with Classified information at the Presidential level.

ABC8 Virginia Poll: 82% Say Hillary Clinton Should Be Criminally Prosecuted…


Good poll lets hope that percentage moves closer to 100% (where it belongs) as we get closer to November.

Emails Expose Hillary & Insider Trading on Greek Bailouts?


Clinton Family

The Clinton Scandals will provide endless TV entertainment, which may be more like a reality TV show with the Kardashians. Most people think it will be Donald Trump. He may give us some frank insults that are badly needed now and then to keep people focused, but the Clintons will provide never ending intrigue and scandals. Now we have the new one involving Hillary’s hedge fund manager son-in-law who is the husband of Chelsea Clinton, who set up in 2012 a Greek bond fund with a special arrangement with none other than Goldman Sachs expecting a bailout to boost Greek debt values. Yep! Now hedge fund manager Marc Mezvinsky placed a huge bet big on a Greek economic recovery based upon political expectations of a bailout for Greece would go through. His Secretary of State mother-in-law allegedly seems to have been sharing classified information to help her son-in-law.

Clinton ChelseThe 2012 Mezvinski $325 million basket of offshore funds under the Eaglevale Partners lost tens of millions of dollars predicting that bailouts of the Greek banking system would pump up the value of the country’s distressed bonds. His exclusive Greek debt fund suffered near-total losses with inside political info. Newly released emails from 2012 show that Hillary and Clinton Foundation consultant, Sidney Blumenthal, shared classified information about how German leadership viewed the prospects for a Greek bailout. Clinton also shared “protected” State Department information about Greek bonds with her husband who allegedly no doubt passed it on to their son-in-law who set up none other than a  Greek bond hedge fund. Sharing such sensitive information with friends and family once again show how the Clintons work. Of course that is illegal and the SEC would normally throw such a hedge fund manager in prison and strip him of his license for none other than Insider Trading. You can bet he too gets a pass by the SEC as does Goldman Sachs if there is any connection with the Blumenthal emails. This just never ends.

Well Chelsea is a director of the Clinton Foundation. Hillary says she is the only one with a plan to deal with Wall Street, which we must assume is to give them inside information to trade with to offset any pretend fines while making the fines tax deductible (nobody else gets that privilege).  The upside, if they keep betting that government deals and manipulations will win, well they may go broke because the free markets are not always acting as the insiders expect. Oops! Sorry about those Greek bonds.

Just maybe Bill Meeting with Lynch was not about the Hillary indictment, which is already fixed and made no sense. The Justice Department is ALSO investigating the Clinton Foundation. The Sidney Blumenthal emails are revealing a different layer. Bill may have been trying to head off that investigation into the Foundation, which could taint New York Bankers and other family members. The assumption it was all about the Hillary indictment is probably nonsense for there is no way they would have allowed Hillary to run for President if there would have been an indictment. That has all been fixed by Obama. There is the Blue Code where cops do not rat on cops; well Democrats have the same code in this case which has become notorious. If there was any possibility of an indictment, she would have to be on bail. Come on. No possible way Hillary gets indicted. That has been fixed to allow her to run. Obama will not torpedo his own party.

This Bill Clinton meet with Lynch was about something else. My bet it was the Foundation and what is emerging from the Blumenthal emails.

Nigel Farage Resigns as Head of UKIP


Farage Vote to Leave

It is a shame, but Nigel Farage is standing down as leader of the UK Independence Party. Nigel came from the real world and never had a desire to be a career politician. He has stated that he had done his “bit” following the UK’s referendum vote to leave the EU. “The victory for the ‘Leave’ side in the referendum means that my political ambition has been achieved.” He said that leading the UKIP was “tough at times” but “all worth it.” He added that Britain now needs a “Brexit prime minister.” He continued: “I have never been, and I have never wanted to be, a career politician. My aim in being in politics was to get Britain out of the European Union.”  He added: “So I feel it’s right that I should now stand aside as leader of UKIP”.

Meanwhile, Tony Blair, the ultimate anti-democratic politician, keep saying that more than 1 million people have changed their minds and Britain should not go through with BREXIT. He would even surrender the Queen. He is living the Euro dream would would surrender the pound and all independence to enslave the British to a new government they could never have a right to vote in to ever change. People like him just assume to know what’s best that career politicians should rule and the people are too stupid to have any influence.

Nigel will be sorely missed. It is a personal battle, absolutely. But with people like Blair hanging around in the wings, the job may not be done to save Britain. It is the people who love telling every one else what they will be allowed to do who want power, and will never resign it. These career politicians are no different than any monarch who also abused the people – let them eat cake!

George Carlin Was Right: “The Big Club”…


Carlin is right the country is owned but sometimes the people wake up and realize what has been done and there are a lot of us and only a few of them! That is why they are in a panic about our guns — don’t ever give them up for if you do you will very shortly be one of their slaves!

Is Bill Clinton Losing It?


Clinton Bill - 9

The whole meeting between Lynch and Bill Clinton calls into question the judgment of both people. Lynch should have declined the meeting and Bill should never have asked to meet her – why? Sources from Hollywood say Bill is losing it. He is not as sharp as he use to be and he may be on medication that does not help. Clearly, nobody seems to believe this was to talk about his grandchildren. He was late and held up to meet with her. She should have declined. This was a stupid meeting for they will not indict and now it will clearly give rise to a conspiracy when others have been indicted for less. The unlikely event of an indictment would mean Hillary would have to step aside. So there is no possible way the investigation can continue and the Democratic Party has way too much invested in this without assurances there would be no indictment. Then Obama has begun to campaign for Hillary, proving there is no indictment to come. The meeting is a disaster and Lynch should resign just to clear the air for this will remain as part of the conspiracy ongoing with no end.

Let me make one thing very clear. The conduct of the Clintons has been outrageous over the years. As soon as they won the White House, Hillary fired the White House Travel staff and gave it all to a personal friend. That became Travelgate in May 1993. There has always been just a question of friends and deals that have gone hand-in-hand. But make no mistake, the Clintons are not unique, they just have done more than most. This is all about career politicians which is why Paul Ryan and Mit Romey continue to publicly work against Trump. They would rather have Hillary in place so Washington remains the same – the playground to get rich for career politicians of both parties.

Declining Pound Savior of Britain


IBBPVA-W 7-3-2016

QUESTION: Marty
It looks like Carney and Osborne are talking the pound down in order to frighten people.

Only one of their prophesies have come true – the lower value of sterling.
But it is unhelpful that they continue to be negative – even though they’ve proved to have been wrong on all the other things [cost of borrowing, asset prices, the UK deficit, cancellation of investments].

I fear [being a Brit] that too much unwarranted negativity from their position of power will take the pound down too far. Do you agree that can achieve that and that they, representing the establishment, are trying to win back some of the lost ground? I would say that is treason [not to carney as he’s a Canadian. I’d tell him to go home].

Thanks
JF, Manchester

ANSWER: The reason “value” investing and “fair value” theories fail is because markets ALWAYS over shoot and under shoot. Our next real zone for the pound is in the mid 120 level. However, ironically, European concepts of currency value is SERIOUSLY WRONG. Post-World War II, European politicians used the rise in their currencies as proof that they did a good job. That installed this concept that a strong currency was good for the economy which in fact if you are concerned about trade, you want a weak currency. The entire reason the Swiss put a peg on to the euro was because the rise in the franc was reducing exports and major companies threatened to leave.

Mother-MerkelThe decline in the pound will BOOST British exports and have exactly the opposite effect helping the British economy. The EU is doomed. Over taxes, over regulated and it has no meaningful democratic process. Worse still, just as Merkel by herself tried to help her negative image because of her harsh dealings with Greece wanted to appear reasonable, she invited the refugees in without any right of other countries to object. She made a decision as Germany, but it automatically impacts all of Europe. Under the EU, no such power should be allowed if all governments must suffer because of one leader.

The pound will drop to penetrate the $1 par level probably no later than 2018. With the political chaos of French and German elections next year, that decline can take place sooner than later. But this is what will force a monetary reform as early as 2018. The rise in the dollar will reduce US exports and that will put political pressure in the States for reform not to mention a debt crisis in emerging markets.

The peak in bonds appears to be in place. We are seeing the rates rise already in the peripheral markets. This will spread from the peripherals in toward the core. So Southern European rates will rise faster than German but when capital figures out the crisis is the EU, then German rates will rise. The Federal rates in the USA will be the LAST to rise because the initial shock will be foreign capital fleeing to the States.

The remarks of British politicians are to be seen in their context of this false perception that a strong currency is good. You hear Trump criticizing China as a “currency manipulator” implying they lower the value of their currency to increase trade. As the pound declines, this will save British jobs – it’s a good thing; not bad.

Hillary Clinton Says She Learned Of Loretta Lynch / Bill Clinton Meeting Through The Media…


Everything about Hillary has always been smoke and mirrors and nothing has changed. If it was for teleprompters she wouldn’t be able to fake a speech. Hillary is 100% a creation and since that creation is nothing like the real Hillary she comes across as a bad actor at best! She has no chance to win the election running against a real person!