I would really be nice if all of them were taken down but Ryan in particular should be voted out!
Tag Archives: multicultural
Chairman Trey Gowdy and Select Benghazi Committee Press Conference…
As a former military officer in Special Operations familiar with the planning of operations I can tell you with 100% certainty that the state there were no assets “Close Enough” to be of assets is 100% BS. There are two reasons for the the most important one was the no one knew how long the battle would last. Number two is the military has rapid action forces stationed all over the world ready to go on a moments notice. The fact that no assets were sent means that Washington didn’t want them sent for even if they didn’t get there till it was over the attempt would have been made. Since no one in Washington knew how long the battle would last and they still did nothing it was strictly a politic decision to protect Obama and Hillary for their incompetence. Unfortunately we now have a military that we can no long trust as it is now only an extension of the Presidents personal servants. This is not the military i was in!
The Rising Trend of Anti-Establishment and Civil Unrest
Armstrong Economics Blog
Re-Posted Jun 29, 2016 by Martin Armstrong
QUESTION: Mr. Armstrong; Your model on civil unrest and war seem to be rather amazing. The anti-establishment feeling is rising quite strong. Not sure what’s going on with Trump. It looks like the Republicans are still trying to prevent him from being the candidate. All the money is going to Hillary. Government is becoming very aggressive. It seems their police and military will turn against the people. Do you have anything showing this?
ANSWER: Every single government agency is arming itself. Even the IRS has AR-15 military-style rifles, and domestic agencies are armed to the teeth. In America, there are more domestic agents armed with weapons than there are Marines. There are more than 200,000 non-Defense Department federal officers authorized to make arrests and carry firearms. The federal government has tripled the number of agents carrying weapons to defend the government in the past 20 years. They know what is coming. They know the socialistic system they constructed is collapsing. Instead of reform, they are digging in their heels, prepared to plow down any domestic uprising. They have been staging military-like drills in U.S. cities against civil unrest. Obama imposed a “litmus test” on military leaders to ask if they would shoot civilians.
On the evening of Monday, August 18, 2014, the U.S. Army commenced military exercises in Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota. MH-60 variant Black Hawk helicopters buzzed through the downtown and residential areas of the two Midwestern cities, as reported by CBS local news. This shocking event was actually a repeat of the August 2012 exercises we previously reported. The U.S. Special Operations Command conducted exercises until the beginning of September along with police from Minneapolis and St. Paul using helicopters, including Black Hawks.
They know what is coming. The establishment by no means wants to see Trump in the White House. His is not one of them and they fear he will side with the people and reform government, right down to the pervasive nepotism. We are in a battle with very high stakes.
Hillary – Has She Compromised the Country?
Armstrong Economics Blog
Re-Posted Jun 29, 2016 by Martin Armstrong
There is a very serious issue that is starting to rise behind the curtain. Obama is coming out blasting Trump as part of some Global Elitist group which does not exist other than those in Obama’s camp to subordinate the people to government. Indeed, it was Obama who played the role of political elitist interfering in Britain quite disgracefully telling the Brits to get to “the back of the queue” when it is Britain who is America’s strongest and oldest ally. If that was not a global elitist attempt to end democracy in Europe telling Britain to surrender its sovereignty to Brussels the equivalent of the US surrendering its sovereignty to the United Nations, then nothing is.
To the contrary, Vladimir Putin maintained his silence throughout the whole BREXIT campaign. The question this all brings up is Hillary’s emails. Putin will not release the emails for it is his secret weapon to control Washington. There are emails involving Obama to Hillary at her private server confirming he knew what she was up to. He also was aware she set up her foundation and that the very countries she approved arms deals for donated to he foundation. Then Obama knew she sold a position on the International Security Advisory Board to a commodities hedge fund trader Raj Fernando who also donated to her foundation when he had no experience or security clearance. Then to hide everything, Obama stood by and did nothing about any of this right down to the fact the Hillary also refused to appoint anyone to the office of Inspector General to monitor the State Department to prevent anyone snooping around so she could hide her corruption.
Now the concern rising is that Putin has the evidence. Instead of releasing it all, He has just let them know he has the goods. That means Putin can now control Hillary and Obama. The fact that Putin has Hillary’s emails may be the reason he suddenly pulled out of Syria for he does not need the confrontation. He can topple Hillary at any time. Vladimir Putin’s announcement that Russia will begin pulling out of Syria appeared to take the White House totally by surprise, and revived concerns that the Russian leader was outmaneuvering Barack Obama. The reason may center around Hillary’s emails.
Only with hindsight, history may be written that this is how the fall of the United States unfolds at the hands of corrupt Hillary. It is entirely possible that Hillary’s personal greed and corruption has compromised Western culture entirely.
BREXIT – One of Four All Showing Anti-Establishment
Armstrong Economics Blog/2016 U.S. Presidential Election
Re-Posted Jun 27, 2016 by Martin Armstrong
Many comments and emails are pouring in that our model correctly forecast BREXIT and years in advance. Here is the picture for the next big chaos period – the US Presidential Election in November. You can see that 3 out of 4 models show a Republican victory. Two of these show 60%+, which is unheard of. What we have just seen in BREXIT is a prelude to the US election – very anti-establishment, anti-immigration, and fed up with stagnant wages thanks to rising taxation.
Tony Blair’s comment were very elitist saying that the people really are stupid and the government should not rush to leave. He says it is too complex to split, but it is also too fix. He just doesn’t get it. People want REAL change and are tired of listening how stupid they are.
We also saw the biggest turnout in Britain ever for such an event. Trump has already gotten more votes in the primary than any Republican candidate in history. This is reflecting what is coming. We should also see a record turnout in November in the US elections.
BREXIT was the first of four major elections that our computer has been projecting a strong anti-establishment uprising building on a global scale. Our targets have been focused on 2016.
The peak in the euro against the British pound was 1985. The day of the low in the pound was February 26th, 1985 (1985.156). Even the Pi cycle from that date was 2016.556 or July 22, 2016.
Our model on the European Union projected the high in 2004 and its collapse into 2008 when the euro peaked over 160 to the dollar. Now we are in. This raises the potential of the EU becoming extinct by 2029.
What lies ahead is going to be amazing. Nevertheless, this is all set in motion by the incompetence of government intermixed with their pervasive corruption.
Rebbelions & the Public v Private Waves
Armstrong Economics Blog
Re-Posted Jun 27, 2016 by Martin Armstrong
QUESTION:
Sir,
Pondering the patterns that you have found in history, I have been mulling over the crossroads that lie in front of us in the next few years. You noted that sovereign debt crises occur about every 86 years or so. You also noted that civil disturbance goes hand in hand with those events. You also noted that it cycles between government/public to private and private to government/public. Am I understanding correctly that the civil disturbance that occurs when it flips between government/public to private is more intense than when it flips from private to government/public?
Thanks for all you do and see you in Nov
DK
ANSWER: Yes. This is because government is a single entity. They will fight against the people to retain power. Make no mistake about it, government will always massacre the people to retain power. All such events in history unfold when the people seek to overturn tyranny. However, there are rebellions even during a Public Wave but these tend to be continuations of a grievance from the previous wave. There were 69 years between the two big English tax rebellions of 1381 and 1450. They do tend to be more intense during Private Waves. You will notice that in a Private Wave then tend to come early whereas in a Public wave then come late and typically spill over. This is because the rebellion aspect is really a separate function of the War Cycle. Therefore, it is an overlap that produces the intensity. Currently, that turned up in 2014.
Political wisdom over the centuries was purchased with the blood and bitter experience of generations upon generations. In England when the King had no right to tax the people. They had to consent and that was the reason to call Parliament to consent to taxation. The first tax revolt was the Wat Tyler’s Rebellion, also known as the Peasants’ Revolt, was a tax rebellion following the Black Death as a result of high taxes to fund the war against France (Hundred Years War). This took place beginning in May and ended in a massacre by November, 1381. Then there was William (Jack) Cade (? – 7/12/1450) who led a tax rebellion which took place in May 1450 which was the subject of Shakespeare’s play of Henry VI in which he wrote his famous passage: “The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.” (King Henry VI, part II, Act IV, Scene 2, Line 72). The lawyers were not “lawyers” as we see them today. The king was the only person allowed to have a lawyer, so they were really prosecutors taking people’s property and imprisoning them for profit.
In France, there was the French Revolution in 1792 over taxation, but there was also a rebellion in 1851. But the first tax rebellion in France was when King John was captured by the English in September 1356. King John was transported to London in April 1357. He was compelled to surrender most of southern France to the English. On October 9th, 1360, John was released to raise the balance of the ransom, while hostages took his place that included his own son. When John’s son escaped, John had little choice and returned to England as a prisoner on his own volition where he died.
In 1358, we find the first tax uprising known as “Jacquerie” because the nobility had called all peasants “Jacque” and the demands for taxes were now outrageous. Taxes were even demanded to rebuild castles of the nobility. The English had plundered the country and these demands led finally to a uprising on May 21st, 1358. The peasants destroyed numerous castles in response and indeed massacred all inhabitants. With the King captured, confusion reigned and the nation was plunged into civil war. The peasants were eventually defeated and they were themselves massacred.
Even in China, the minister Chao Cuo (? – 154BC) under the previous emperor Ching-ti (Liu Ch’i)(157-141BC), earned the hatred of other ministers after he introduced 30 new laws. The outrage was so intense; he was dragged out and executed in his judicial robes in the town marketplace. The abuse of the rule of law knows no bounds. When Edward I (1272-1307) returned to England in 1289, he was confronted by corrupt judges who had been bribed by special interests and dismissed them summarily. Then in 1290, Edward I seized all the property of the Jews and expelled them from England. Kings, dictators, and professional political classes, have always exploited the rule of law for their personal gain.
Massacres of the people in a revolt against government exist throughout history. We should expect our modern governments will act in the very same manner. They are right now arming themselves and they have converted the police forces into military domestic units.
Boris Johnson Independence Day Brexit Speech Given a Soundtrack…
good speech!
Whoopsie – 70% Of British Parliament Petition Signatures Demanding Another EU Referendum Don’t Live In The U.K….
They lost too bad and now they will find a way to nullify the election!
COLD ANGER – Entire Institutional Systems Will Be Dispatched Like a Feather In a Hurricane…
I see the same thing and I see support for Trump every where I go. No one that I know believes anything the medial puts out and even some on the other side are now getting worried — they do have kids as well so its getting personal not abstract. This has to play out if they try to stop the movement there will be a 2nd civil war in they don’t try to stop it and any Democrat gets in the Republic is finished. With all the changes that have been made over the past 15 years there is enough junk passed into law now that a President could easily become a dictator. Our only hope is the Trump gets in and fixes things — my only fear is that he doesn’t see how bad it really is.
Now The Losers Want a 2nd Referendum To Overturn BREXIT
Armstrong Economics Blog
Re-Posted Jun 25, 2016 by Martin Armstrong
A petition has circulated gained they claim 1 million signatures to overturn BREXIT and hold a second referendum. Of course they will do a far better job at rigging this one if it goes through. Such people deserve what they petition for and should surrender the pound and the Queen. They have zero idea of what is coming from Brussels but this is playing into the hands of Cameron no doubt and the rest of the establishment. They assume government will survive. They are clueless that Brussels will collapse as we move forward.








