The documentary, “Hillary’s America,” looks into the secret history of the Democratic Party and Hillary’s rise to become the presidential candidate. I find it rather astonishing to see a movie out before the election about Hillary’s crazy history.

One would think that the Democrats would have preferred Joe Biden. Hillary plays dirty and many fear getting in her way. Yet, the Democratic Party determined Hillary would rule Washington as the first woman president. She is such a feminist that this is her only real goal, not helping the nation.

I have not seen this movie to attest to its veracity. I cannot recall a presidential election that was ever this nuts. I understood that this would be a crazy period economically back in 1985 when our computer was highlighting 2016 as a crazy economic year. I never anticipated such a chaotic election as we have today. The burning question is why the Democrats went along with Hillary rather than someone who did not have such a crazy cloud over them.

QUESTION:

Hi Mr. Armstrong,

As you have stressed many times, your Socrates computer system has hundreds of years of data. The US political system has hundreds of years of momentum (or perhaps inertia) behind it. Do you think Donald Trump can really change where we are headed, IF he were elected President?

Thanks as always,

MB

ANSWER: No. What he can do is perhaps pave the way to change what is coming, which is a new form of government. Career politicians are causing us to suffer. Perhaps he will be able to highlight that problem and there may be more of a confrontation with members of Congress. He would tend to have no problem exposing them and what is really going on.

He cannot prevent the crash and burn. Nobody can do that. Perhaps he can highlight the real problem. Moreover, he might be less likely to just sign whatever they put in front of him as they do with career politicians.

We are headed toward a complete political change. That is unquestionable. So I would look at Trump more so as assisting the change that is already coming about.

Hillary Clinton & Michael Bloomberg at the Goldman Sachs new building construction

Former Mayor of New York City Michael Bloomberg had the audacity to deliver a speech at the Democratic Convention saying, “There are times when I disagree with Hillary Clinton. But let me tell you, whatever our disagreements may be, I’ve come here to say: We must put them aside for the good of our country. And we must unite around the candidate who can defeat a dangerous demagogue.” Bloomberg began at Salomon Brothers, the notorious firm that was shut down for manipulating the US government bond auctions. It was Bloomberg who defended Wall Street against the protest “Occupy Wall Street” and arrested people for exercising their First Amendment Rights.

Bloomberg Politics’ Washington News director Kathy Kiely resigned because Michael Bloomberg will not allow freedom of the press. She said when she resigned in January 2016, “I think that Michael Bloomberg has built a terrific news organization but that he needs to liberate it to cover all the news, even the news about him.“

In my own case, Bloomberg erased all the files on me, so if you put my name into their system the bulk of everything is gone. We even used to publish on Bloomberg. That’s gone. Bloomberg denied there were any stories they published on TV. The movie producer found it elsewhere and had to go to Bloomberg News to say he found what Bloomberg said did not exist. So Bloomberg is not exactly a fair or unbiased organization. They would NEVER publish my allegations against the bank. I believe it was always a one-sided reporting affair to protect the government and the banks.

The question this invokes: Is Michael Bloomberg the dangerous demagogue? Will the real dangerous demagogue please stand up!