Tag Archives: The United Vaccine Front

May 28 2020

Twitter—The Big Lie Of Our Time


Meanwhile, If anyone should be “fact checked” or censored, it should be Twitter.

Judi McLeod image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—May 27, 2020

Twitter—The Big Lie Of Our Time
You can get away with calling on wing-nuts with specifics on a lethal way to murder the president of the United States on Twitter as deranged comedian Kathy Griffin just did—but will be flagged by Twitter ‘fact checkers’ for posting tweets that call mail-in ballots “fraudulent” and predicting that “mail boxes will be robbed” if you’re President Donald Trump.

“Comedian and perennial Trump antagonist Kathy Griffin is advocating for the physical assault of the president, tweeting that she wants someone to stab the commander in chief with a “syringe with nothing but air inside” — a potentially lethal act if it creates an embolism. (Breitbart, May 27, 2020)

Physically threatening?

Physically threatening?  How about calling to the cause someone who would kill or assassinate the president?

“Physically threatening the president of the United States is a federal offense. Physical threats also constitute a violation of Twitter’s terms of service that can result in permanently getting kicked off the platform. (Breitbart, May 27, 2020)

“We will immediately and permanently suspend any account found to be posting violent threats,” the social media giant says on its official site.”

Oh, yeah? Then how come Griffin’s Tuesday Tweet with a most descriptive means to take down the President of the U.S. is still riding high on Twitter Wednesday morning?

“For the first time, Twitter has flagged some of President Donald Trump’s tweets with a fact-check warning. ( Yahoo, May 27, 2020)

“On Tuesday, Twitter added a warning phrase to two Trump tweets that called mail-in ballots “fraudulent” and predicted that “mail boxes will be robbed,” among other things. Under the tweets, there is now a link reading “Get the facts about mail-in ballots” that guides users to a Twitter “moments” page with fact checks and news stories about Trump’s unsubstantiated claims.

If Twitter calls Trump’s claims on the legality of mail-in-ballots. “unsubstantiated” then they must be “unsubstantiated”.

“Until now, the president has simply blown past Twitter’s half-hearted attempts to enforce rules intended to promote civility and “healthy” conversation on its most prominent user. Trump frequently amplifies misinformation, spreads abuse and uses his pulpit to personally attack private citizens and public figures alike — all forbidden under Twitter’s official rules. (Yahoo)

In a statement, Twitter said Trump’s vote-by-mail tweets “contain potentially misleading information about voting processes and have been labeled to provide additional context around mail-in ballots.”

“Over the weekend, the president issued several tweets calling into question the legality of mail-in-ballots. The storm of tweets followed Facebook and Twitter posts from Trump last week that wrongly claimed Michigan’s secretary of state mailed ballots to 7.7 million registered voters. Trump later deleted the tweet and posted an edited version that still threatened to hold up federal funds. (Breitbart, May 27, 2020)

“Twitter policy forbids sharing “false or misleading information intended to intimidate or dissuade people from participating in an election or other civic process.” While it has previously flagged tweets, it has never before put warnings on tweets for any other reason.

“Trump replied on Twitter, accusing the platform of “interfering in the 2020 Presidential Election” and insisting that “as president, I will not allow this to happen.”

“His 2020 campaign manager Brad Parscale said Twitter’s “clear political bias” had led the campaign to pull “all our advertising from Twitter months ago.”

Twitter says in its terms of service that “you may not threaten violence against an individual or a group of people. We also prohibit the glorification of violence.”  The company said it defines violent threats as “statements of an intent to kill or inflict serious physical harm on a specific person or group of people.” (Breitbart)

“Federal law states that individuals who physically threaten the president can face up to five years in prison.

That’s the latest political Twitter antics in the U.S.

 
Trudeau Foundation Annual Report (page 37) 2018-2019

“Twitter Canada is listed as a sponsor in the Trudeau Foundation Annual Report…now we know why anything “Trudeau Bad” doesn’t stay on the viewable trending list for long. #CDNpoli. (Twitter)

That proves more than anything else that Twitter’s not just the social media platform for people to deposit their cute, humorous or even vitriolic, evil little messages—but a massive political force in action.

Meanwhile, If anyone should be “fact checked” or censored, it should be Twitter.

May 28 2020

Exposing the Hoaxes Killing America


The New American Video

Linda Goudsmit image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—May 27, 2020

In this interview with The New American’s Alex Newman, author and political analyst Linda Goudsmit outlines some of the pseudo-humanitarian hoaxes that have been used by world-government advocates to undermine American freedom on the road to a New World Order.
May 28 2020

When Are Doctors Considered Incompetent?


How many politicians you have sought out for medical advice?

Tony Mangan image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—May 27, 2020

When Are Doctors Considered Incompetent?

Doctors become incompetent when they disagree with a politician. When I see an interview of some governor who is charged with the wellbeing of his constituents and should be shepherding them to safety and prosperity, I see that the convenience of the Corona virus has allowed governors, some mayors, and even council critters to become junior Mussolinis.  They conduct all of their oppressive behavior based on what, according to them, the scientific community recommends. That’s all they need to proclaim before the media gets behind them and prints their story supporting the oppressor. Ask the media for details and they will begin to wriggle and squirm and stutter something about the scientific community.

This “Plandemic” seems to be the ideal vehicle of convenience for the politician to spew a multitude of lies and flaccid excuses as to why nothing bad that happens is their fault and everything that they do is in accordance with scientific approval.

Stay in your house; you must wear a mask in public; your children must be kept indoors; you must stay a minimum of six feet away from another person. The virus can be spread by phone—a technical truth, provided a non-infected person picks up that phone right after an infected person hangs it up.

Frankly, when it comes to my health, that of my family or even my dog, I do not want a politician involved, for as sure as there is ice in The Arctic—if it is of no value to him personally—he’ll let you die. And if it is to his advantage for you to die, you would be wise to make your final arrangements. Ask Governor Cuomo.

If there is any doubt in your mind, just tell me how many politicians you have sought out for medical advice, or any advice for that matter, that they didn’t send you to some member of their staff to handle the matter.  Yet, they want to dictate to their fellow citizens during a “pandemic.”  I don’t think I would ever consider trusting a politician to instruct me on how to successfully strike a match.

May 28 2020

Hong Kong – The Matchstick to War?


Armstrong Ecoomics Blog/HongKong

Re-Posted May 28, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

The US-China tensions over Hong Kong are boiling over. The US government is reportedly considering imposing sanctions on Chinese firms and officials over China’s new national security laws for Hong Kong, which have already re-ignited anti-Beijing protests in the city.

The UK government has also raised concerns over Chinese state TV reporting on the new measures, and Hong Kong residents seeking to circumvent the “great firewall” are downloading privacy-protecting VPNs at a record pace. Meanwhile, China’s President Xi Jinping is calling on the country to prepare for military conflict.

The primary deterrent to war is ECONOMICS. This coronavirus scam has crashed the global economy. With the prospect of reduced trade, recession in China will escalate and this will only create anti-West feelings and will further the trend toward war.

Hong Kong’s greatest security was economics. Now that the coronavirus is being used to kill the economy to further climate change and socialism, we are cascading faster and faster into a very dark future that we will all need to address.

May 28 2020

Families Dividing over the Virus


Armstrong Economics Blog/Disease

Re-Posted May 28, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

COMMENT: Mr Armstrong:
I had to write to tell you that you are absolutely right about two things in particular I have now seen one presented so thoroughly one sided I could not believe what I was reading. I was reading one of the blogs where they were condemning the so called climate change deniers by pointing out that the historical record going back more than 500 million years clearly showed that it was all carbon dioxide related. I was fascinated by something you keep driving home, they were focused entirely on CO2. I dislike being involved where I can see people have no brains and I asked one question with many parts, What about the cycles of sun as an influence?, what about the nitrogen, Oxygen, Argon, Neon, Helium, Nitrous Oxide, Ozone, Methane? Further what about the earth itself, the moon cycles, the solar winds? These people all think it is really only one influence. We are doomed if these people are in charge. There response was the did not matter because the there was no reliable indicator of the temperature of the sun, to which I asked what about the rest?

They responded that they do not count. Excuse me but about 95% of the atmosphere is water vapor. What about that? No reply. Another thing I find very fascinating and maybe I am not looking hard enough. When I was in high school there was a course called earth science, that is where I learned how broad the determining factors of the climate and weather are. What I find interesting is I cannot find any high school teaching the course any longer? Do you know why?

My final observation is that you are correct more than you know the propaganda behind this respiratory virus is causing rifts in families, it is happening in my own, my brother is a scientist and he goes on and on telling me how this is going to result in 100s of thousands of deaths. I keep arguing with him no. He does not talk to me any longer even though I have been sending him things that are intended to only help him with his research. He even told me Hydroxychloroquinine does not work when combined with Zinc and antibiotics, To which I reminded him that our father whom was a doctor and had a great background in chemistry, zoology and biology told us many times that zinc can stop colds or lessen the impact and if we could find a way to get the zinc into the cell of someone already sick we could shorten the virus dramatically. To which he tells me I am wrong.

In any event what you warned is actually happening. Sad and true at the same time.
Thanks for everything that you do by bringing facts to the table not fantasy.

F

REPLY: I find it very interesting how the climate change people ignore all the evidence and have substituted pollution for the power to change the climate. We are heading into a solar minimum and instead they claim this is now caused by CO2. Nobody in the media dares to even question them. They report their allegations as conclusive facts. Greta blamed the Australian drought on climate change, yet droughts have taken place in Australia for hundreds of years.

The splitting of families over this virus issue is troubling, but it is also NORMAL. The very same splits emerged in Britain over Brexit. It has created major divides in families over left and right politics to the point where they are no longer speaking. It will also take place between the parents and their children. The thinking process will simply divide a family very rapidly and the exploitation of this virus is having a profound social restructuring.

Another reader wrote to express a similar result of the lockdown: “I know so many people who are struggling with politics these days, but in my family, it’s gotten downright very bad and unpleasant. I think my family is in trouble over everything that’s happening in this country, even in the world. We can’t seem to have a family gathering without some kind of big blow-up.”

Some people see the problems completely differently and expect the government to be capable of saving the day. But political differences are becoming a more heated topic than religion ever was. Since, for better or worse, political decisions have a huge impact on our lives and there are those who just prefer to blame others for their own problems. This seems to be really a major generational shift as well, and unfortunately, it is part of the process as we move toward 2032. It is the underlying cause of civil unrest in such times of uncertainty.

May 28 2020

Gates’ Eugenics End Goal – Population Control


Armstrong Economicis Blog/Disease

Re-Posted May 28, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

What is truly amazing is how the mainstream media is so intent upon just accepting whatever Bill Gates says and his entire agenda without the slightest bit of investigation. They just hate Trump so intensely that they do not care what the agenda is behind Gates’ global assault on the economy, arguing we will never be safe 100% without his vaccine, and his insistence of vaccinating the entire world.

None of the mainstream media seem to even think this is a wild agenda. All they have to do is look at Gates’ father and his elitist view of eugenics which drove him to be the head of Planned Parenthood. Why will nobody in the media even look into the subject? Do they assume they are one of the chosen few that are in the elite class with Gates? Do they not care that the entire eugenics movement of the Progressive Era was outright racist?

The American Eugenics Society (AES) was one of the leading theories of the Progressive Movement which emerged out of socialism at the turn of the 20th century. It was founded by the famed eugenicist and conservationist Madison Grant (1865-1937), who was an American lawyer, writer, and zoologist. Madison Grant’s book, The Passing of the Great Race, was devoted to an attempt to give the meaning of history through his view of race. Grant looked at civilization by race, not politics or language. He argued that European ethnic groups such as the Alpine and Nordic races were superior. This book was first published in 1916, and it formed the foundation of the American Eugenics Society of which Bill Gates Sr was a member.

Grant was joined by other leading thinkers and activists of the Progressive Era which included Harry H. Laughlin (1880-1943), who was an American educator, eugenicist, and sociologist, Henry Crampton (1875-1956), who was an American evolutionary biologist and malacologist (branch of invertebrate zoology), Irving Fisher (1867-1947), who was the famous American economist who declared the stock market reached a new plateau in 1929 before the crash. Fisher was a very active Progressive social campaigner. There was also Henry F. Osborn (1857-1935) who was an American paleontologist and geologist.

It was Osborn who articulated the entire Progressive Movement with its subset of eugenics based on conservationism which saw that reducing population would further civilization and that those who were poor were really holding back society. This was the common view of the time being put forth by the elite, that namely heredity is superior to influences from the environment. Nobody could be educated in reality, it was all heredity. Therefore, Osborn expressed the view of the AES that distinct races existed with fixed hereditary traits. He concluded that the Nordic or Anglo-Saxon “race” was the highest. Osborn supported eugenics to preserve “good” racial stock which is why he endorsed Grant’s book writing both the second and fourth prefaces for him.

The AES described eugenics as the study of improving the genetic composition of humans through the controlled reproduction of different races and classes of people. This elitist end-goal remains that of Bill Gates despite the fact he will not come out publicly and state that he is focusing on India and Africa for this group has long viewed them as the bottom of race within society. This is why he is so obsessed with population control.

It was Gates to called together a group of Billionaires to sell his concerns about reducing the population in 2009. While we know that was the topic, nobody wants to talk about details. This entire Coronavirus scam is part of his end-goal to control the population. It was even Gates who has funded remote control birth-control by implanting chips into women. Then Gates will be able to turn on and off births according to whatever criteria he desires like a TV with remote control. That will lead to only one place – required permission and permits to even have children.

Given Gates’ father’s involvement in Planned Parenthood and a member of eugenics, you would think someone would investigate. Add Gates’ push to then eliminate all paper money to be able to tag everyone on the planet and control the entire world economy through his ID efforts, you would think this is the plot of a James Bond megalomaniac villain. Microsoft even just announced on January 9, 2020, their Microsoft Identity solutions project. Gates resigned from the board of Microsoft allegedly only to try to distance himself for PR purposes.

The US Supreme Court actually upheld their eugenics views in Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927), where the United States Supreme Court, written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., actually ruled that a state statute permitting compulsory sterilization of the unfit, including the intellectually disabled, “for the protection and health of the state” did not violate the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The Supreme Court actually wrote: “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” The Supreme Court has never expressly overturned Buck v. Bell. This was the precise theory behind the Nazi movement to adopt eugenics terminating all disabled people and later moved to ethnic cleansing.

Interestingly, before the revelation of the death camps of the Nazis was finally exposed in July 1944 where they were carrying out the mass murder of millions of European Jews, Gypsies, the intellectually disabled, physically disabled veterans, dissidents, and homosexuals between 1933 and 1945, eugenics was an acceptable theory. Only after what the Nazis were doing was the word eugenics swapped for population control.

The Supreme Court ruled on eugenics once again in Skinner v. State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Williamson, 316 U.S. 535 (1942). Here, the United States Supreme Court ruled that held that laws permitting the compulsory sterilization of criminals were unconstitutional if the sterilization law treats similar crimes differently. In this case, the Oklahoma law applied to “habitual criminals” but it did exclude white-collar crimes. That could have applied to even traffic tickets which are a crime. The Court held that treating similar crimes differently violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.

The AES was renamed the Society for the Study of Social Biology in 1972. Whether Bill Gates is targeting Africa and India paying bribes to corrupt politicians to carry out his vaccinations is another topic just ignored by mainstream media. To them, Bill Gates walks on water. Is Gates target what his father regarded as the lowest races on earth, or is that where he could just bribe his way into the governments to use their population for his grand plan? Nobody will even raise the question in mainstream media. The real question is how long will it take for the people to rise up against their own corrupt politicians now trying to take what Gates has done in Africa and India and impose it by decree in America and Europe?

May 28 2020

Devin Nunes: House Cannot Debate FISA Reauthorization When Democrats are Not Here….


Posted originally on The Conservative Tree House on May 27, 2020 by 

Devin Nunes appears on Fox News daytime to discuss the pending FISA reauthorization bill from the Senate amid President Trump’s request to expose corruption before legislation.  As Representative Nunes outlines there are only a handful of Democrats in Washington DC because they are planning all votes by proxy.  Nuts.

May 27 2020

Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 5)


Where might America be today had these studies been taken seriously by the government doctors?

Lee Cary image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—May 26, 2020

Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 5)
Review of Part 4 Takeaways
  • The notion that Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) could be a safe, inexpensive, readily-available, and effective drug to mitigate the effect of SARS-CoV-1 provoked efforts to discredit and silence those who supported that hypothesis.
  • As the debate between HCQ and Remdesivir progressed, the potential benefits of HCQ were supported by credible scientists and medical organizations, forcing the NIH to test HCQ.
  • When Trump announced he’d been taking a regime of HCQ, it enhanced the tempo and temperature of the debate.
  • The likely end of Remdesivir considered as an effective treatment of patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 opened the way for a replacement drug to emerge from another lab.
  • The Lancet, a nearly 200-year old British medical journal, stated that no antiviral drug has yet been proven effective for patients with severe SARS-CoV-2.

Those pushing Remdesivir, until its wheels came off, either ignored or downplayed scholarly studies favorable to HCQ. And, in some cases, ridiculed those who took them seriously.

When pro-HCQ videos posted on YouTube, the site’s Though Police deleted them and substituted the ominous dark screen above.

Destroying HCQ advocates

Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 5)
Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 4)
Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 3)
Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 2)
Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 1)

The pushback began with Dr. Judy Mikovits.  Note how Wikipedia profiles her (bolding added):

“Judy Anne Mikovits (born 1957 or 1958) is a former American research scientist who is known for her discredited medical claims, such as that murine endogenous retroviruses are linked to chronic fatigue syndrome. She has been described as an anti-vaccination activist and a promoter of conspiracy theories, and has been accused of scientific misconduct. She has made several false claims about vaccines, COVID-19, and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS)…In 2020, Mikovits promoted conspiracy theories about the COVID-19 pandemic via the internet video Plandemic, which made claims that are either false, or not based on scientific evidence.”

No bias there.

Her video (26 min) was nearing four million views on YouTube when the site’s Thought Police pulled it and replaced it with the screen above. You weren’t allowed to watch it. BTW, Mikovits is not a fan of the Wizard of SARS, Dr. Tony Fauci.

Now Mikovits has a shorter (10-min) video on YouTube. It’s not at the shutdown level, yet. Nor is it as thorough as the initial version.

After Mikovits came Professor Dolores Cahill, an even more formidable contrarian to the approved federal medical meme.  Cahill’s a full professor at University College, Dublin, Ireland, in the College of Medicine.  According to her bio on the university site, she is “a world-wide renowned expert in high-throughput proteomics technology development and automation, high content protein arrays and their biomedical applications, including in biomarker discovery and diagnostics.”

Here is a sample of her achievements:

Professor Dolores Cahill

  • “Prof. Cahill pioneered this research area at the Max-Planck-Institute of Molecular Genetics in Berlin, Germany, and holds several international patents in this field with research, biomedicine and diagnostic applications.
  • Over 20 years expertise in high-throughput protein & antibody array, automation, proteomics technology development & biomedical applications in biomarker discovery, diagnostics & personalised medicine.
  • Since 2005 to present, Full Professor of Translational Science, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Academic, Researcher, Lecturer, Module Coordinator in Pathology Teaching, School of Medicine & Conway Institute o 15 years as Irish, EU & international expert & advisor including Seconded National Expert to European Commission.
  • Company Co-founder & Shareholder (1997-2019) of Protagen AG in Germany (https://protagen.com/). Protagen Protein Services (2012-2019) contract services to healthcare sector & pharmaceutical industry (https://protagenproteinservices.com/).
  • Since 2016, co-founding shareholder and Advisory Board member of Prof. Stephen Pennington’s UCD School of Medicine/Conway Institute spin-out company, Atturos Ltd. working to improve Prostate Cancer diagnosis.
  • Prof. Cahill has a total of over 5,940 Citations, H (Hirsh)-index of 35, i10-index of 48.”

Need more? Try here.

Google “Dolores Cahill” and the first item up is a BusinessInsider.com article. It notes that it took 7 days for Facebook and YouTube to pull her 67 min. video.

Sharyl Attkisson

The Thought Police had more trouble erasing former CBS reporter Sharyl Attkisson’s video at Full Measure News. She examines the potential benefits of HCQ and suggests financial interests of its detractors may be in play. (She may have left CBS News because Ms. Attkisson is a real, live, actual investigative reporter.) 

YouTube pulled her 10 min. video, but then under pressure, reinstated it here. (Watch it while you can.) 

In a turnabout on May 21, legalinsurrection.com posted an article entitled “YouTube Reinstates Video in Which Doctors Say Hydroxychloroquine Treats COVID-19.” Soon thereafter, Attkisson was granted an interview with Trump.

Next came a legacy of the liberal print media—New York Times paper & magazine – that focused on other HCQ targets.

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko

April 2: “Touting Virus Cure, ‘Simple Country Doctor’ Becomes a Right-Wing Star, How Dr. Vladimir Zelenko’s claims for his coronavirus treatment spread from a New York village all the way to President Trump”

“Last month, residents of Kiryas Joel, a New York village of 35,000 Hasidic Jews, roughly an hour’s drive from Manhattan, began hearing about a promising treatment for the coronavirus that had been rippling through their community. The source was Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, 46, a mild-mannered family doctor with offices near the village. Since early March, his clinics had treated people with coronavirus-like symptoms, and he had developed an experimental treatment consisting of an antimalarial medication called hydroxychloroquine, the antibiotic azithromycin and zinc sulfate.”

“After testing this three-drug cocktail on hundreds of patients, some of whom had only mild or moderate symptoms when they arrived, Dr. Zelenko claimed that 100 percent of them had survived the virus with no hospitalizations and no need for a ventilator. ‘I’m seeing tremendous positive results,’ he said in a March 21 video, which was addressed to President Trump and eventually posted to YouTube and Facebook.”

[Note poetic polemic from the Times]“What happened next is a modern pandemic parable that illustrates how the coronavirus is colliding with our fragile information ecosystem: a jumble of facts, falsehoods and viral rumors patched together from Twitter threads and shards of online news, amplified by armchair experts and professional partisans and pumped through the warp-speed accelerator of social media.”

In other words, Zelenko is not someone to be taken seriously by the intelligent people who read the Times.

May 12: “He Was a Science Star. Then He Promoted a Questionable Cure for Covid-19. The man behind Trump’s favorite unproven treatment has made a great career assailing orthodoxy. His claim of a 100 percent cure rate shocked scientists around the world.”

Didier Raoult

The article about Didier Raoult in the NYT Magazine began:

“When diagnosing the ills afflicting modern science, an entertainment that, along with the disparagement of his critics and fellow researchers, he counts among his great delights, the eminent French microbiologist Didier Raoult will lightly stroke his beard, lean back in his seat and, with a thin but unmistakable smile, declare the poor patient to be stricken with pride. Raoult, who has achieved international fame since his proposed treatment for Covid-19 was touted as a miracle cure by President Trump, believes that his colleagues fail to see that their ideas are the products of mere intellectual fashions—that they are hypnotized by methodology into believing that they understand what they do not and that they lack the discipline of mind that would permit them to comprehend their error. ‘Hubris,’ Raoult told me recently, at his institute in Marseille, ‘is the most common thing in the world.’” {snip}

“Raoult, who founded and directs the research hospital known as the Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire Méditerranée Infection, or IHU, has made a great career assailing orthodoxy, in both word and practice.”

The tone of the NYT: How dare this French doctor assault what is medical orthodoxy to us in New York, and, thereby, ruin his career!

May 21:  But then, suddenly, former Democrat candidate for the Presidency, Senator Amy Klobuchar, admitted that HCQ recently cured her husband of SARS-Cov-2.  The news likely shook the halls of the DNC.

May 23: “World-famous medical doctor Dr. Drew Pinsky appeared on Fox 11 Los Angeles to react to President Trump revealing he (Pinsky) is taking the malaria drug hydroxychloroquine to lessen the symptoms of coronavirus.” The FOX News local reporter interviewing Pinsky was flabbergasted with what he was hearing.

It’s not as though there has been no scholarly research by competent scientists to examine the efficaciousness of HCQ. There has been—since January 28. Here’s a long biographical review of findings from then until April 13.

The overview of them all states:

“In general, completed clinical studies have yielded promising results regarding the safety and effectiveness of Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine in the TREATMENT of COVID-19…Within the context of an expanding COVID-19 pandemic, it is reasonable to propose the EARLY use of Hydroxychloroquine in attempt to reduce the number of COVID patient hospitalization days, and hence provide an increased rate of patient turnover and a more efficient use of limited hospital ventilators.” (caps and underlining in original)

Then, the final opinion:

“Historical controls are used in many previous studies in medicine. In this respect, the safety of Hydroxychloroquine is well documented. When the safe use of this drug is projected against its apparent effect of decreasing the progression of early cases to ventilator use, it is difficult to understand the reluctance of the authorities in charge of U.S. pandemic management to recommend its use in early COVID-19 cases. The effects of the chloroquines were first outlined 15 years ago by the CDC’s own Special Pathogens Unit.”

So,

Where might America be today had these studies been taken seriously by the government doctors?

And, who was responsible for seeing that they were not?

Breaking News: USA Today, quoted in the Chicago Sun Times, headline reads: “World Health Organization suspends use of hydroxychloroquine in study: ‘We want to use hydroxychloroquine if it is safe and efficacious, if it reduces mortality, reduces the length of hospitalization, without increasing the adverse events,” said Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, WHO’s chief scientist.’”

Next, Part 6: What began as laboratory science morphed into political science. Going forward: Beware of the coming of the “Trackers.”

 

May 27 2020

When Will Democrat Governors Set The Masses Free From Lockdown?


Meanwhile, don’t anybody expect to be let out of Lockdown until after Nov. 3, 2020—the real date when desperado Dems will set world masses free

Judi McLeod image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—May 26, 2020

When Will Democrat Governors Set The Masses Free From Lockdown?
The question most prominent on most people’s minds: When will the blankety-blank Lockdown end?

No secret.  It will be when manipulative governments ‘fess up not only that the pandemic has ended—but already ended some time ago.

You don’t have to own the wisdom of a Solomon to come up with the right answer, but only to mark off annual holidays as they come up on the calendar.  The last holiday society got through in the sadly missed Days of Freedom was Christmas 2019—which the braggadocio left had long promised to steal—but couldn’t.  Resurrected in defiant intent, the globalist Left-which many state governors are—swiped Holy Week and Easter from the unsuspecting masses and then considered themselves to be on an unstoppable roll.

The rot of Liberal governors has unfortunately spread to other lands, including to the country next door where Canada Day celebrations have already been cancelled by the Justin Trudeau-led feds.  Government ‘leaders’ like Ontario Premier Doug Ford rushed off into CYA territory where small business owners have already been evicted by landlords when they couldn’t—having already been cut off from their businesses—come up with the rent.

Infuriatingly to the left,  government edict could not stop uncountable millions from respectfully honoring their war dead during yesterday’s Memorial Day ceremonies.

Leftist governors are undoubtedly now working on the proverbial monkey wrench to ruin upcoming July 4th celebrations. Only time will tell how successful they might be.

We keep reading in the Media how depression has hit the masses kept on lockdown.  Humans suffer psychological damage when kept from being with their families, believers left in a state of yearning when locked out of their houses of worship.  In this era of Clinical Depression, suicides are on the rise.

The only thing that can be taken for granted is that the Left will do whatever possible to keep the Lockdown in place until after November’s presidential election.  It’s the only thing left for them in stealing the election from President Donald Trump.

That will give them time for Mrs. Barack Obama to succeed with her bogus “When We All Vote’ initiative to turn Election 2020 into a total mail-in vote one—an initiative she deceitfully claims is: “NON-PARTISAN!

Surely of interest to note that it was her co-chair Tom Hanks was one of the first to come down with COVID-19, among other ‘firsters’ Pope Francis, and high-ranking members of the Iranian Government.

Talking about swipers, it was deceitful doctors Tony Fauci and Deborah Birx who took full credit for ‘social distancing’ when they really swiped the idea from a then 14-year-old New Mexico high school student who never got to shout: “Stop thief!”

“A 15-year-old New Mexico high school sophomore says she’s discovered closing schools would be the best way to halt a bird flu pandemic. (Medical XPress, May 9, 2006)

“Laura Glass of Albuquerque, N.M., is one of nearly 1,500 students taking part in this week’s Intel International Science and Engineering Fair being held in Indianapolis. The students compete for $1.5 million in scholarships and prizes based on their work.

“Glass created a virtual town of 10,000 people to simulate a bird flu pandemic, the Albuquerque Journal reported. She then computed how many people each person came into close contact with daily.

“She found most teenagers came into close contact with about 140 people daily, the most of any group, with middle and high school students having the greatest potential of spreading the disease.

“In her simulation, adults bring the disease into the community and infect their children. “From there,” she told the Journal, “it spreads like crazy once it gets (into) … the schools.”

“In one simulation in her virtual city of 10,000 people, about half the population became infected. But Glass found closing schools reduced that number to 500.”

In order to see clearly through what the Media and Hollywood-supported Left are up to, look into their poisonous symbol called ‘The Mask’.

Black-masked Joe and Jill Biden display it best:

As savvy Noah Pollck Tweeted yesterday:

“In this outdoor setting where he was only physically close to his wife, masks were completely unnecessary. But masks have become a form of political signaling for the left, an expression of virtuous obedience to the lockdown and hostility to Trump. So the Bidens wore them.”

Before the Bidens it was Hollywood groupie Dr. Fauci wearing a ginormous mask in every frame standing behind President Trump at the last President’s Task Force in the White House Rose Garden.

Meanwhile, don’t anybody expect to be let out of Lockdown until after Nov. 3, 2020—the real date when desperado Dems will set world masses free.

May 27 2020

Demockracy: A More Sophisticated Tyranny


“Mr. Kenney, make Canada a democracy again.”

Mark Gray image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—May 26, 2020

Demockracy: A More Sophisticated Tyranny

Democracy:

  1. government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system.

Apparently, Canadians enjoy such a form of government. If so, that’s news to the 20 indigenous bands whose elected chiefs signed agreements to help build the Coastal GasLink pipeline.  The bands voted to choose their representatives. The Chiefs voted for a huge project that would provide opportunity, revenue, and good paying jobs to their communities. Business would flourish. Taxes would flow. Win-win-win. A perfect example of government by the people. Textbook democracy.

Demockracy:

  1. government over the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the government and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under an ideologically corrupt electoral system.

The Trudeau Liberals, however, pipeline and prosperity haters that they are, had a problem. How could they shut down the pipeline and not look like they were intentionally harming indigenous peoples who voted for it? They found the solution in the unelected Wet’suwet’en Hereditary “chiefs”, a few of whom objected to the project. The Liberals, with plenty of support from the media, chose the unelected chiefs to speak for the bands, essentially rendering the band member’s vote and the Chief’s decisions meaningless. Textbook demockracy.

“Experts” own your vote.

The Wet’suwet’en Hereditary chiefs did not usurp the band member’s votes themselves, they were simply a proxy for the real vote stealer, climate “experts” whose model predictions, like the COVID-19 predictions, have failed to materialize. Our big mistake is believing the models are meant to reflect reality. They aren’t, they are purposely designed to generate existential threats. The “experts” then say, “we’re all going to die unless we do something drastic”. The government, well, their hands are tied. Who are they to defy the “experts”? They don’t really want to implement policy that transfers wealth and freedom from the people to the rulers, they’re forced to in order to save lives.

It’s a beautiful scam that allows government to assume absolute power while delegating responsibility to the “experts” whose opinion now matters more than our votes. It is a much more elegant path to power than gulags or firing squads. Demockracy is a sophisticated form of oppression. A kinder, gentler tyranny.

Political ideology is irrelevant. Both progressive and conservative governments bowed to the “expert’s” demands to shut down our economies and lockdown the people. None questioned the accuracy of the models. None dared defy the new overlords, the “expert” class who keep getting everything wrong but still keep their exalted status. How does that work?

The media choose the “experts”

Think about it. What expert comes to mind when you think about climate change? The IPCC? Greta? The WWF, perhaps? How is it that a trace gas that comprises a mere .04% of the atmosphere, a substance we exhale with each breath, a component necessary for life on earth, can become a toxic climate killer with a greater climatic impact than the sun? Was there a debate? No. The media decided there was a crisis and they determine who is and isn’t a climate expert. If you agree with the consensus you are worthy, if you don’t, you’re a climate denier regardless of your PHD and 30 years working and teaching in the field.

The climate models predicted the end of polar ice and a burning planet. They were proven wrong years ago, and are still wrong, but the climate “experts” who agree, the all-powerful consensus, are still relied upon by our governments to shape climate policy. Consensus and science are mutually exclusive terms. A consensus has zero scientific value, none. However, it provides the “expert” opinion favoured by demockracies so it’s here to stay.

The COVID modellers are already proven wrong but their expertise is still shaping policy. The truth that COVID-19 is a bad flu that targets the elderly is coming out. Even the CDC admits it has a remarkably low death rate.

What would be really nice is if leaders like Ontario Premier Doug Ford and Kenney looked at the new CDC numbers and asked themselves, hey, what are we doing here? It’s ludicrous to close schools, playgrounds, and parks. It’s unnecessary to shut down business. Social distancing and masks are pointless. We are ending COVID policing, a policy doing grave damage to the relationship between society and authority, and we are opening up immediately.

It would be even better if they asked the media why news feeds remain filled with concerns about society re-opening, fears about a second wave, worry about people violating social distancing, the need for testing, vaccines, and contact tracing? Why don’t they throw the declining death rate in the media’s face and ask why they insist Canadians suffer further harm?

Our leader’s inability or unwillingness to step up is disconcerting. Their continued reliance on “experts” who are nothing of the sort and their whimpering acquiescence to a media who divorced the truth long ago is pushing people to the brink.

Taking Freedom Back

We the people are beginning to understand that if we want to live in freedom, we’ll have to step outside our comfort zone and demand it. The growing protests are a start, but they won’t change the flawed infrastructure of our demockracy.

Fledging groups like “Unify The People” are forming with the goal of declaring provincial independence and sovereignty. They are regular people tired of demockratic tyranny. The battle is on.

Calgarian Donna Ferolie has filed suit against the Federal government claiming that Frederick Haultain never signed Alberta into Confederation. Jason Kenney says he wants a fair deal and if Donna is right, he has all the leverage he needs to create a new, fair Canadian Confederation that respects the rights and freedoms of the people. Mr. Kenney, make Canada a democracy again.