BREXIT: What Would Happen to Brits Living in EU?


BREXIT On Schedule

QUESTION: Mr. Armstrong; The scaremongering going on here is claiming that if BREXIT becomes reality, we will be thrown out of Europe and have to pay massively for healthcare outside of Britain. Do you have any information on this?

Thank you

A former neighbor

DS

ANSWER: There is something most Europeans are clueless about. The EU is by no means a free deal for all. The EU will be in dire straights if BREXIT goes through. Britain will be in far better shape than Europe. The EU will most likely offer the UK a European Economic Area (EEA) deal, which would have no impact on Brits at all. What is that? An EEA option will have virtually no effect on expats living in the EU. There is no doubt that single market participation will not change for the EU would be shooting itself in the head.

As for the question of healthcare, I do not doubt that they are lying about that as well. Currently, anyone from Britain living in Europe on a pension receives free healthcare. It is true that this is not the case outside the EU. However, unknown to most, the UK currently pays a large sum to countries in the EEA to cover British healthcare. For example, the British Department of Health already reimburses other EEA countries as well as Switzerland for the cost of providing treatment to people for under EU law, irrespective of nationality. The likelihood of that ending is probably nil for it would mean any EU citizen would be denied healthcare in Britain.

I seriously doubt that leaving the EU would disturb trade or healthcare. The net effect of BREXIT would retain independence of London as a financial center, eliminate the necessity to open its borders, and exit the likelihood of the Bank of England being subordinated to the ECB, which will come, not to mention freedom for its own taxes and regulation. Despite the “scaremongering”, Britain would get the benefits of trading with the EU without surrendering its sovereignty to an unelected bureaucracy that the people would have no possible way to disagree with, outside of war.

A Snapshot of what Obama has accomplished in 7 years and 3 months and there are still 9 months to go.


A friend sent me an email with this series of charts in it today and after looking at it I thought I would pass it on.  There is no explanation needed the charts all speak for themselves.

ECONOMY

Judge Jeanine: Only One Person Can Keep Americans Safe


Published on May 22, 2016

Comparing the presidential candidates’ reactions to threats.
Fox News: Justice with Judge Jeanine Pirro
http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/justice…

 

Candidate Bernie Sanders Full “Bernin’ Bridges” Interview Discussing Debbie Wasserman Schultz…


Bernie is a real goof ball but he is right about the democrat party process in picking a candidate; further the democrat party is much worse than the republican party who has a much smaller influence in their process.

Austrian Elections Today Too Close to Call!


Election-5-22-2016

The people who count the votes claim the election is a dead-heat in Austria today. Norbert Hofer of the Freedom Party and Alexander Van der Bellen are each on 50%, according to the estimate, which includes postal votes not yet counted. The pools really put Hofer ahead, so there may be some voting counting issued, Stalin fashion. Nevertheless,  what this is demonstrating is that 50% of the people are fed up with the EU. Instead to addressing the crisis, those in Brussels refuse to ever change course.

BOOM – Trump Leads Clinton In ABC/Washington Post Poll, Even With D+8 Poll Sample…


Trump is on the way there is no stopping him now!

Donald Trump Message to National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference…


Hillary doesn’t have a chance!

Diet Leninism – Coca Cola Halts Production in Venezuela Due To Sugar Shortage…


This is what communism or socialism gets you when you run out of the ability to pay for the free stuff. Anyone that votes for Hillary is voting to bring what you see in Venezuela here — so if you don’t want to have any beer, toilet paper or soda vote for Hillary.

ECM 2015.75: The Rock vs. Hard Place


Rock Hard Place

QUESTION: Mr. Armstrong, with your 2015.75 turning point on the ECM, you said that was the peak in government and the following 4.3 years would turn down rather hard. You also said 2016 would be a strong rise in 3rd party activity and people are now talking even about Bernie running 3rd party. You said 2017 would be the year from political hell and it looks really crazy here in Europe and with Merkel gone, everything will change. Then you said the monetary system would change by 2020 but could come as early as 2018. You said interest rates would start to rise in 2016 as early as March and that would be the fuel behind the dollar and help create the Sovereign Debt Crisis. I understand this is not your opinion and I can now see how each is linked to create the trend. The Berlin conference was fantastic and really helped me understand how this all fits together. My question is simply this. Do you have any idea what the type of monetary system we are headed into? What survives? You said the IMF is trying to position itself for that role which you opposed. Any clue yet?

ANSWER: The Fed is between a rock and a hard place and is trying to be that little flower that sees the light. It has two choices: (1) deal with the pension crisis at home by raising rates to prevent defaults, or (2) keep rates low to save other governments in emerging markets who continue to borrow and are doomed anyhow. Then there is the question of whether the budget deficit in the USA will explode with rising rates.

The Fed has really lost control of the economy, but the mainstream still needs to figure this out. Our model goes nuts from 2018 into 2020. This is part of the peak in 2015.75. Of course, the general public does not see this yet. They should by next year and then the game will change.

Quiet-into-LightGovernments will not go quietly into the light. They will rage at every possible moment. They are moving toward electronic money since their solution is to force everyone to pay whatever tax they demand. On January 1, 2017, G20 will begin sharing info on everyone. Compliance in business will cost tens of billions of dollars alone. Even companies who do not have foreign clients will have to confirm they do not.

Naturally, governments will act in the most stupid manner for they will not reform. Even if they grab everything, it would not be enough to save them. So be prepared. They will get very punitive. Expect crazy laws to benefit them like constitutional amendments. They will find whatever excuse to confiscate assets; mere suspicion will become proof and it will be your burden to prove innocence.

The old guard is near death. People like John McCain and Barbara Boxer, who was shouted down in California by Bernie supporters, are out the door. We are looking at new people coming to power — the changing of the guard. In this respect, Trump is part of the new and Hillary is the old world of corrupt politics. We are turning the corner. Those in government remain clueless.

What survives is always tangible assets be it land, industry, shares, or something of value like gold, silver, antiques, etc. Whatever currency we use is only a medium of exchange between tangible assets. Currency is not “money,” it never holds its value, and by no means is it a store of wealth. It is just a medium of exchange like a language. So whatever we end up with, which I believe will be some basket of currencies, will become the new medium of exchange through which everything else is measured.

Trump & Interest Rates


IntRate-Manipulate

QUESTION:  Martin– Your models seem to predict a Trump win. Given Trump’s stated preference for low interest rates, how does that jive with rates needing to go up to normalize things and save pensions in the next year or two? Would the Fed have to give in to President Trump?

Thanks!

RK

ANSWER: Keep in mind two things. First, the President has no power over interest rates. Secondly, neither does the Fed. The Fed at best can control short-term rates, but the entire QE was to try to influence the long-end. Additionally, whatever people say when running for office has no real bearing.

Furthermore, keep in mind we published that projection before Trump even announced he was running. So this has nothing to do with Trump personally or what he says or not and it should not be taken as an endorsement. One person cannot change the direction of the world alone. The reason Trump may win is that the Democrats are still in denial. The Republicans have had to swallow their pride. Trump has brought in millions of new people. Hillary has not. The Democrats have not figured out that the grass-roots are fed up with career politicians regardless of party. This disconnect within the Democratic Party has some speculating that the FBI will charge Hillary to clear the way for Biden. That would be a problem because Bernie supporters would get really pissed off. But this is the clash between the rulers and the great unwashed as they see us.

Trump is flexible. He will bend to the problem of pensions and agree that higher rates are needed. So I do believe Trump would be better at the economy for he would make decisions based upon private sector experience rather than theory and dogma from career politicians. Let’s face that much. We have not had anyone in politics with private sector experience for at least 85 years.

We are in a period of deflation right now which means people are hoarding cash and not spending rashly. They do not have confidence in the future so they are holding back plain and simple; saving for that rainy day. Everything goes nuts when they realize government is incapable of controlling anything.