Tag Archives: Will Happer

May 28 2020

Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 6 – Last in Series)


There is much left to address concerning SARS-CoV-2, best seen clear in the rearview mirror

Lee Cary image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—May 27, 2020

Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both?What do you see in the picture above? Is it the eye of a rabbit looking right, or a bird turned left? Or, both? The same is asked when looking at the SARS-CoV-2 ordeal.

Review of Part 5 Takeaways

  • Conventional wisdom among the Scientific Community—a first cousin of the “Intelligence Community” – never took HCQ seriously as a contender for the role of interim mitigator of virus symptoms until a proven vaccine comes along.
  • Proponents of HCQ, regardless of some very impressive résumés, are treated as kooks by the established science experts.
  • The chief scientist of the World Health Organization recently announced the suspension of HCQ trials because they’re too dangerous, WHO says.

Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 6)
Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 5)
Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 4)
Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 3)
Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 2)
Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 1)

Marshaling an army of “Contact Tracers”

The Grand Re-opening of America may be accompanied by one or more efforts to marshal large groups of contact tracers, tasked to map a new wave of virus victims. Several such efforts are being discussed.

One by-product of the home quarantine of “non-essential” persons, regardless of age, could be the hunt for fresh victims in a second wave of infections. Herd immunity was never given the chance to be established.

The Scientific Community anticipates a new wave of virus victims coming after the nation opens up to normalcy. Some suggest The New Normal will require diligent monitoring of the population, with no end in sight.  And, their thinking is, such monitoring is best done by those trained to trace people with whom the newly infected are/were in contact.  Hence, contact tracing.

On April 18, Bill Clinton and Andrew Cuomo talked contact tracing in the context of a virtual gathering of the Clinton Global Initiative University.

Let’s listen in on their unrehearsed discussion concerning contact tracing, relying on the C-SPAN transcript of the 40 min. video:

Cuomo: (24:19) “We need tracing agents in the hundreds and hundreds of people. You take a trace test – you take a test and then trace back the contact. This has never been done on this scale. This is an army of investigator and tracers, we will do that the best we can with this seven-state consortium, but it could have been done from the federal government on a tighter and more efficient {sic}.” (Cuomo listed six of the seven in northeastern state “consortium”: New Jersey, New York, Massachusetts, Delaware, Rhode Island, and Connecticut.)

Clinton: (24:50) “I agree with you on this, this contact tracing is very important, and it could have enabled our entire country to have a real public health system, a real public health corps (indiscernible) could we make this a part of the current treatment? Is there some other way we could do it?  I’m worried (indiscernible) that they’re trying to get a state contact tracing core, you have to get bodies in there, and they have to be safe while they are tracing.  You cannot just show up in your jeans and t-shirts.  You have to really know what you are doing when you are going into these neighborhoods and trying to run these needs down. Do you think maybe you could get the governors to ask congress to fund that? Or maybe we can spend some of the money, but we need a national core of healthy people who are trying to go out and do contact tracing. We need bodies.”

Partners in Health (PIH) is already engaged with one state in Cuomo’s consortium.  As of May 12:

“Partners in Health was recently selected by Massachusetts governor Charlie Baker to conduct Coronavirus ‘contact tracing,’ a process that involves teams of investigators finding out who infected people have come into contact with. The group is already ‘training and deploying hundreds of contact tracers.’ Some citizens fear the potential for mass surveillance posed by contact tracing, especially in light of a Democrat-introduced bill in Congress to authorize contact tracing ‘at individuals’ residences.’ Partners In Health’s involvement will not assuage many fears, considering the group has received funding from George Soros and Bill Gates organizations and counts Chelsea Clinton on its board of trustees.”

PIH’s 2017 Form 990, posted on Guidestar.com, reported their annual revenue as $127,157,823.

On May 1, in conjunction with the move toward contact tracking, 45 House Democrats, led by Rep. Bobby Rush (IL, 1st Dis.), proposed HR 6666, entitled “Covid-19 Testing, Reaching, and Contacting Everyone (TRACE) Act.” The Bill was referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

HR 6666’s stated purpose is: “To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to award grants to eligible entities to conduct diagnostic testing for COVID–19, and related activities such as contact tracing, through mobile health units and, as necessary, at individuals’ residences, and for other purposes.”

The Bill, a short read, is found here. It suggests $100,000,000,000 (not a typo) funding for fiscal year 2020; and, of course, “such sums as may be necessary for each of fiscal year 2021 and any subsequent fiscal year during which the emergency period continues.”

A population under observation needs immunity documentation

Politico.com announced, on April 10, that:

“Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, revealed Friday the federal government is considering issuing Americans certificates of immunity from the coronavirus, as the Trump administration works to better identify those who have been infected and restart the U.S. economy in the coming weeks. ‘You know, that’s possible,’ Fauci told CNN’s ‘New Day,’ when asked whether he could imagine a time when people across the country carry such forms of identification.”

“‘I mean, it’s one of those things that we talk about when we want to make sure that we know who ‘the vulnerable people are and not,’ he said. ‘This is something that’s being discussed. I think it might actually have some merit, under certain circumstances.’” (bolding added)

In a related comment noted by NPR, Dr. Robert Redfield, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC), said:

“People are looking at all the different modern technology that could be brought to bear to make contact tracing more efficient and effective. Are there more, if you will, say, tech savvy ways to be more comprehensive in contact tracing versus the old-fashioned way? You know, currently, these things are under aggressive evaluation.”

How far and how deep might this future medical surveillance go?

On May 12, Dr. Anthony Fauci dropped a hint when testifying before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions in a hearing about reopening America. He said:

“There’s no guarantee that the vaccine is actually going to be effective.”

Think of that comment as the bookend of an earlier one Fauci made at the Georgetown University Medical Center just a few days before the Inauguration of Trump. Fauci’s speech was titled “Pandemic Preparedness in the Next Administration.” He said:

“There is no question that there will be a challenge to the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases.”

“No question?” None? How did he know that for sure?

Series Conclusion

There is much left to address concerning SARS-CoV-2, best seen clear in the rearview mirror. For example:

  • How did the reactions of Blue and Red state governors vary?
  • How did America’s religious organizations react when the Government closed them?
  • What can we say about the role of the print, internet, televised, and social media?
  • Is there a “new normal” ahead, and what is it?
  • What is the impact on public and private schools, of all ages?
  • What happens the next time there’s a virus event?
  • Was any traditional American freedom sacrificed never to return?
  • How did the nation view the leadership of Donald J. Trump?
  • And critical for geopolitical issues: Why and How did the virus originate?

Regarding the question in the series’ title – “Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both” – that’s for you to answer.

If you’re willing, go to this site’s comment board and write what you think.

This remains, despite all, a free country.

May 28 2020

Twitter—The Big Lie Of Our Time


Meanwhile, If anyone should be “fact checked” or censored, it should be Twitter.

Judi McLeod image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—May 27, 2020

Twitter—The Big Lie Of Our Time
You can get away with calling on wing-nuts with specifics on a lethal way to murder the president of the United States on Twitter as deranged comedian Kathy Griffin just did—but will be flagged by Twitter ‘fact checkers’ for posting tweets that call mail-in ballots “fraudulent” and predicting that “mail boxes will be robbed” if you’re President Donald Trump.

“Comedian and perennial Trump antagonist Kathy Griffin is advocating for the physical assault of the president, tweeting that she wants someone to stab the commander in chief with a “syringe with nothing but air inside” — a potentially lethal act if it creates an embolism. (Breitbart, May 27, 2020)

Physically threatening?

Physically threatening?  How about calling to the cause someone who would kill or assassinate the president?

“Physically threatening the president of the United States is a federal offense. Physical threats also constitute a violation of Twitter’s terms of service that can result in permanently getting kicked off the platform. (Breitbart, May 27, 2020)

“We will immediately and permanently suspend any account found to be posting violent threats,” the social media giant says on its official site.”

Oh, yeah? Then how come Griffin’s Tuesday Tweet with a most descriptive means to take down the President of the U.S. is still riding high on Twitter Wednesday morning?

“For the first time, Twitter has flagged some of President Donald Trump’s tweets with a fact-check warning. ( Yahoo, May 27, 2020)

“On Tuesday, Twitter added a warning phrase to two Trump tweets that called mail-in ballots “fraudulent” and predicted that “mail boxes will be robbed,” among other things. Under the tweets, there is now a link reading “Get the facts about mail-in ballots” that guides users to a Twitter “moments” page with fact checks and news stories about Trump’s unsubstantiated claims.

If Twitter calls Trump’s claims on the legality of mail-in-ballots. “unsubstantiated” then they must be “unsubstantiated”.

“Until now, the president has simply blown past Twitter’s half-hearted attempts to enforce rules intended to promote civility and “healthy” conversation on its most prominent user. Trump frequently amplifies misinformation, spreads abuse and uses his pulpit to personally attack private citizens and public figures alike — all forbidden under Twitter’s official rules. (Yahoo)

In a statement, Twitter said Trump’s vote-by-mail tweets “contain potentially misleading information about voting processes and have been labeled to provide additional context around mail-in ballots.”

“Over the weekend, the president issued several tweets calling into question the legality of mail-in-ballots. The storm of tweets followed Facebook and Twitter posts from Trump last week that wrongly claimed Michigan’s secretary of state mailed ballots to 7.7 million registered voters. Trump later deleted the tweet and posted an edited version that still threatened to hold up federal funds. (Breitbart, May 27, 2020)

“Twitter policy forbids sharing “false or misleading information intended to intimidate or dissuade people from participating in an election or other civic process.” While it has previously flagged tweets, it has never before put warnings on tweets for any other reason.

“Trump replied on Twitter, accusing the platform of “interfering in the 2020 Presidential Election” and insisting that “as president, I will not allow this to happen.”

“His 2020 campaign manager Brad Parscale said Twitter’s “clear political bias” had led the campaign to pull “all our advertising from Twitter months ago.”

Twitter says in its terms of service that “you may not threaten violence against an individual or a group of people. We also prohibit the glorification of violence.”  The company said it defines violent threats as “statements of an intent to kill or inflict serious physical harm on a specific person or group of people.” (Breitbart)

“Federal law states that individuals who physically threaten the president can face up to five years in prison.

That’s the latest political Twitter antics in the U.S.

 
Trudeau Foundation Annual Report (page 37) 2018-2019

“Twitter Canada is listed as a sponsor in the Trudeau Foundation Annual Report…now we know why anything “Trudeau Bad” doesn’t stay on the viewable trending list for long. #CDNpoli. (Twitter)

That proves more than anything else that Twitter’s not just the social media platform for people to deposit their cute, humorous or even vitriolic, evil little messages—but a massive political force in action.

Meanwhile, If anyone should be “fact checked” or censored, it should be Twitter.

May 28 2020

Exposing the Hoaxes Killing America


The New American Video

Linda Goudsmit image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—May 27, 2020

In this interview with The New American’s Alex Newman, author and political analyst Linda Goudsmit outlines some of the pseudo-humanitarian hoaxes that have been used by world-government advocates to undermine American freedom on the road to a New World Order.
May 28 2020

Gates’ Eugenics End Goal – Population Control


Armstrong Economicis Blog/Disease

Re-Posted May 28, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

What is truly amazing is how the mainstream media is so intent upon just accepting whatever Bill Gates says and his entire agenda without the slightest bit of investigation. They just hate Trump so intensely that they do not care what the agenda is behind Gates’ global assault on the economy, arguing we will never be safe 100% without his vaccine, and his insistence of vaccinating the entire world.

None of the mainstream media seem to even think this is a wild agenda. All they have to do is look at Gates’ father and his elitist view of eugenics which drove him to be the head of Planned Parenthood. Why will nobody in the media even look into the subject? Do they assume they are one of the chosen few that are in the elite class with Gates? Do they not care that the entire eugenics movement of the Progressive Era was outright racist?

The American Eugenics Society (AES) was one of the leading theories of the Progressive Movement which emerged out of socialism at the turn of the 20th century. It was founded by the famed eugenicist and conservationist Madison Grant (1865-1937), who was an American lawyer, writer, and zoologist. Madison Grant’s book, The Passing of the Great Race, was devoted to an attempt to give the meaning of history through his view of race. Grant looked at civilization by race, not politics or language. He argued that European ethnic groups such as the Alpine and Nordic races were superior. This book was first published in 1916, and it formed the foundation of the American Eugenics Society of which Bill Gates Sr was a member.

Grant was joined by other leading thinkers and activists of the Progressive Era which included Harry H. Laughlin (1880-1943), who was an American educator, eugenicist, and sociologist, Henry Crampton (1875-1956), who was an American evolutionary biologist and malacologist (branch of invertebrate zoology), Irving Fisher (1867-1947), who was the famous American economist who declared the stock market reached a new plateau in 1929 before the crash. Fisher was a very active Progressive social campaigner. There was also Henry F. Osborn (1857-1935) who was an American paleontologist and geologist.

It was Osborn who articulated the entire Progressive Movement with its subset of eugenics based on conservationism which saw that reducing population would further civilization and that those who were poor were really holding back society. This was the common view of the time being put forth by the elite, that namely heredity is superior to influences from the environment. Nobody could be educated in reality, it was all heredity. Therefore, Osborn expressed the view of the AES that distinct races existed with fixed hereditary traits. He concluded that the Nordic or Anglo-Saxon “race” was the highest. Osborn supported eugenics to preserve “good” racial stock which is why he endorsed Grant’s book writing both the second and fourth prefaces for him.

The AES described eugenics as the study of improving the genetic composition of humans through the controlled reproduction of different races and classes of people. This elitist end-goal remains that of Bill Gates despite the fact he will not come out publicly and state that he is focusing on India and Africa for this group has long viewed them as the bottom of race within society. This is why he is so obsessed with population control.

It was Gates to called together a group of Billionaires to sell his concerns about reducing the population in 2009. While we know that was the topic, nobody wants to talk about details. This entire Coronavirus scam is part of his end-goal to control the population. It was even Gates who has funded remote control birth-control by implanting chips into women. Then Gates will be able to turn on and off births according to whatever criteria he desires like a TV with remote control. That will lead to only one place – required permission and permits to even have children.

Given Gates’ father’s involvement in Planned Parenthood and a member of eugenics, you would think someone would investigate. Add Gates’ push to then eliminate all paper money to be able to tag everyone on the planet and control the entire world economy through his ID efforts, you would think this is the plot of a James Bond megalomaniac villain. Microsoft even just announced on January 9, 2020, their Microsoft Identity solutions project. Gates resigned from the board of Microsoft allegedly only to try to distance himself for PR purposes.

The US Supreme Court actually upheld their eugenics views in Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927), where the United States Supreme Court, written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., actually ruled that a state statute permitting compulsory sterilization of the unfit, including the intellectually disabled, “for the protection and health of the state” did not violate the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The Supreme Court actually wrote: “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” The Supreme Court has never expressly overturned Buck v. Bell. This was the precise theory behind the Nazi movement to adopt eugenics terminating all disabled people and later moved to ethnic cleansing.

Interestingly, before the revelation of the death camps of the Nazis was finally exposed in July 1944 where they were carrying out the mass murder of millions of European Jews, Gypsies, the intellectually disabled, physically disabled veterans, dissidents, and homosexuals between 1933 and 1945, eugenics was an acceptable theory. Only after what the Nazis were doing was the word eugenics swapped for population control.

The Supreme Court ruled on eugenics once again in Skinner v. State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Williamson, 316 U.S. 535 (1942). Here, the United States Supreme Court ruled that held that laws permitting the compulsory sterilization of criminals were unconstitutional if the sterilization law treats similar crimes differently. In this case, the Oklahoma law applied to “habitual criminals” but it did exclude white-collar crimes. That could have applied to even traffic tickets which are a crime. The Court held that treating similar crimes differently violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.

The AES was renamed the Society for the Study of Social Biology in 1972. Whether Bill Gates is targeting Africa and India paying bribes to corrupt politicians to carry out his vaccinations is another topic just ignored by mainstream media. To them, Bill Gates walks on water. Is Gates target what his father regarded as the lowest races on earth, or is that where he could just bribe his way into the governments to use their population for his grand plan? Nobody will even raise the question in mainstream media. The real question is how long will it take for the people to rise up against their own corrupt politicians now trying to take what Gates has done in Africa and India and impose it by decree in America and Europe?

May 27 2020

Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 5)


Where might America be today had these studies been taken seriously by the government doctors?

Lee Cary image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—May 26, 2020

Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 5)
Review of Part 4 Takeaways
  • The notion that Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) could be a safe, inexpensive, readily-available, and effective drug to mitigate the effect of SARS-CoV-1 provoked efforts to discredit and silence those who supported that hypothesis.
  • As the debate between HCQ and Remdesivir progressed, the potential benefits of HCQ were supported by credible scientists and medical organizations, forcing the NIH to test HCQ.
  • When Trump announced he’d been taking a regime of HCQ, it enhanced the tempo and temperature of the debate.
  • The likely end of Remdesivir considered as an effective treatment of patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 opened the way for a replacement drug to emerge from another lab.
  • The Lancet, a nearly 200-year old British medical journal, stated that no antiviral drug has yet been proven effective for patients with severe SARS-CoV-2.

Those pushing Remdesivir, until its wheels came off, either ignored or downplayed scholarly studies favorable to HCQ. And, in some cases, ridiculed those who took them seriously.

When pro-HCQ videos posted on YouTube, the site’s Though Police deleted them and substituted the ominous dark screen above.

Destroying HCQ advocates

Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 5)
Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 4)
Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 3)
Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 2)
Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 1)

The pushback began with Dr. Judy Mikovits.  Note how Wikipedia profiles her (bolding added):

“Judy Anne Mikovits (born 1957 or 1958) is a former American research scientist who is known for her discredited medical claims, such as that murine endogenous retroviruses are linked to chronic fatigue syndrome. She has been described as an anti-vaccination activist and a promoter of conspiracy theories, and has been accused of scientific misconduct. She has made several false claims about vaccines, COVID-19, and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS)…In 2020, Mikovits promoted conspiracy theories about the COVID-19 pandemic via the internet video Plandemic, which made claims that are either false, or not based on scientific evidence.”

No bias there.

Her video (26 min) was nearing four million views on YouTube when the site’s Thought Police pulled it and replaced it with the screen above. You weren’t allowed to watch it. BTW, Mikovits is not a fan of the Wizard of SARS, Dr. Tony Fauci.

Now Mikovits has a shorter (10-min) video on YouTube. It’s not at the shutdown level, yet. Nor is it as thorough as the initial version.

After Mikovits came Professor Dolores Cahill, an even more formidable contrarian to the approved federal medical meme.  Cahill’s a full professor at University College, Dublin, Ireland, in the College of Medicine.  According to her bio on the university site, she is “a world-wide renowned expert in high-throughput proteomics technology development and automation, high content protein arrays and their biomedical applications, including in biomarker discovery and diagnostics.”

Here is a sample of her achievements:

Professor Dolores Cahill

  • “Prof. Cahill pioneered this research area at the Max-Planck-Institute of Molecular Genetics in Berlin, Germany, and holds several international patents in this field with research, biomedicine and diagnostic applications.
  • Over 20 years expertise in high-throughput protein & antibody array, automation, proteomics technology development & biomedical applications in biomarker discovery, diagnostics & personalised medicine.
  • Since 2005 to present, Full Professor of Translational Science, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Academic, Researcher, Lecturer, Module Coordinator in Pathology Teaching, School of Medicine & Conway Institute o 15 years as Irish, EU & international expert & advisor including Seconded National Expert to European Commission.
  • Company Co-founder & Shareholder (1997-2019) of Protagen AG in Germany (https://protagen.com/). Protagen Protein Services (2012-2019) contract services to healthcare sector & pharmaceutical industry (https://protagenproteinservices.com/).
  • Since 2016, co-founding shareholder and Advisory Board member of Prof. Stephen Pennington’s UCD School of Medicine/Conway Institute spin-out company, Atturos Ltd. working to improve Prostate Cancer diagnosis.
  • Prof. Cahill has a total of over 5,940 Citations, H (Hirsh)-index of 35, i10-index of 48.”

Need more? Try here.

Google “Dolores Cahill” and the first item up is a BusinessInsider.com article. It notes that it took 7 days for Facebook and YouTube to pull her 67 min. video.

Sharyl Attkisson

The Thought Police had more trouble erasing former CBS reporter Sharyl Attkisson’s video at Full Measure News. She examines the potential benefits of HCQ and suggests financial interests of its detractors may be in play. (She may have left CBS News because Ms. Attkisson is a real, live, actual investigative reporter.) 

YouTube pulled her 10 min. video, but then under pressure, reinstated it here. (Watch it while you can.) 

In a turnabout on May 21, legalinsurrection.com posted an article entitled “YouTube Reinstates Video in Which Doctors Say Hydroxychloroquine Treats COVID-19.” Soon thereafter, Attkisson was granted an interview with Trump.

Next came a legacy of the liberal print media—New York Times paper & magazine – that focused on other HCQ targets.

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko

April 2: “Touting Virus Cure, ‘Simple Country Doctor’ Becomes a Right-Wing Star, How Dr. Vladimir Zelenko’s claims for his coronavirus treatment spread from a New York village all the way to President Trump”

“Last month, residents of Kiryas Joel, a New York village of 35,000 Hasidic Jews, roughly an hour’s drive from Manhattan, began hearing about a promising treatment for the coronavirus that had been rippling through their community. The source was Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, 46, a mild-mannered family doctor with offices near the village. Since early March, his clinics had treated people with coronavirus-like symptoms, and he had developed an experimental treatment consisting of an antimalarial medication called hydroxychloroquine, the antibiotic azithromycin and zinc sulfate.”

“After testing this three-drug cocktail on hundreds of patients, some of whom had only mild or moderate symptoms when they arrived, Dr. Zelenko claimed that 100 percent of them had survived the virus with no hospitalizations and no need for a ventilator. ‘I’m seeing tremendous positive results,’ he said in a March 21 video, which was addressed to President Trump and eventually posted to YouTube and Facebook.”

[Note poetic polemic from the Times]“What happened next is a modern pandemic parable that illustrates how the coronavirus is colliding with our fragile information ecosystem: a jumble of facts, falsehoods and viral rumors patched together from Twitter threads and shards of online news, amplified by armchair experts and professional partisans and pumped through the warp-speed accelerator of social media.”

In other words, Zelenko is not someone to be taken seriously by the intelligent people who read the Times.

May 12: “He Was a Science Star. Then He Promoted a Questionable Cure for Covid-19. The man behind Trump’s favorite unproven treatment has made a great career assailing orthodoxy. His claim of a 100 percent cure rate shocked scientists around the world.”

Didier Raoult

The article about Didier Raoult in the NYT Magazine began:

“When diagnosing the ills afflicting modern science, an entertainment that, along with the disparagement of his critics and fellow researchers, he counts among his great delights, the eminent French microbiologist Didier Raoult will lightly stroke his beard, lean back in his seat and, with a thin but unmistakable smile, declare the poor patient to be stricken with pride. Raoult, who has achieved international fame since his proposed treatment for Covid-19 was touted as a miracle cure by President Trump, believes that his colleagues fail to see that their ideas are the products of mere intellectual fashions—that they are hypnotized by methodology into believing that they understand what they do not and that they lack the discipline of mind that would permit them to comprehend their error. ‘Hubris,’ Raoult told me recently, at his institute in Marseille, ‘is the most common thing in the world.’” {snip}

“Raoult, who founded and directs the research hospital known as the Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire Méditerranée Infection, or IHU, has made a great career assailing orthodoxy, in both word and practice.”

The tone of the NYT: How dare this French doctor assault what is medical orthodoxy to us in New York, and, thereby, ruin his career!

May 21:  But then, suddenly, former Democrat candidate for the Presidency, Senator Amy Klobuchar, admitted that HCQ recently cured her husband of SARS-Cov-2.  The news likely shook the halls of the DNC.

May 23: “World-famous medical doctor Dr. Drew Pinsky appeared on Fox 11 Los Angeles to react to President Trump revealing he (Pinsky) is taking the malaria drug hydroxychloroquine to lessen the symptoms of coronavirus.” The FOX News local reporter interviewing Pinsky was flabbergasted with what he was hearing.

It’s not as though there has been no scholarly research by competent scientists to examine the efficaciousness of HCQ. There has been—since January 28. Here’s a long biographical review of findings from then until April 13.

The overview of them all states:

“In general, completed clinical studies have yielded promising results regarding the safety and effectiveness of Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine in the TREATMENT of COVID-19…Within the context of an expanding COVID-19 pandemic, it is reasonable to propose the EARLY use of Hydroxychloroquine in attempt to reduce the number of COVID patient hospitalization days, and hence provide an increased rate of patient turnover and a more efficient use of limited hospital ventilators.” (caps and underlining in original)

Then, the final opinion:

“Historical controls are used in many previous studies in medicine. In this respect, the safety of Hydroxychloroquine is well documented. When the safe use of this drug is projected against its apparent effect of decreasing the progression of early cases to ventilator use, it is difficult to understand the reluctance of the authorities in charge of U.S. pandemic management to recommend its use in early COVID-19 cases. The effects of the chloroquines were first outlined 15 years ago by the CDC’s own Special Pathogens Unit.”

So,

Where might America be today had these studies been taken seriously by the government doctors?

And, who was responsible for seeing that they were not?

Breaking News: USA Today, quoted in the Chicago Sun Times, headline reads: “World Health Organization suspends use of hydroxychloroquine in study: ‘We want to use hydroxychloroquine if it is safe and efficacious, if it reduces mortality, reduces the length of hospitalization, without increasing the adverse events,” said Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, WHO’s chief scientist.’”

Next, Part 6: What began as laboratory science morphed into political science. Going forward: Beware of the coming of the “Trackers.”

 

May 27 2020

When Will Democrat Governors Set The Masses Free From Lockdown?


Meanwhile, don’t anybody expect to be let out of Lockdown until after Nov. 3, 2020—the real date when desperado Dems will set world masses free

Judi McLeod image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—May 26, 2020

When Will Democrat Governors Set The Masses Free From Lockdown?
The question most prominent on most people’s minds: When will the blankety-blank Lockdown end?

No secret.  It will be when manipulative governments ‘fess up not only that the pandemic has ended—but already ended some time ago.

You don’t have to own the wisdom of a Solomon to come up with the right answer, but only to mark off annual holidays as they come up on the calendar.  The last holiday society got through in the sadly missed Days of Freedom was Christmas 2019—which the braggadocio left had long promised to steal—but couldn’t.  Resurrected in defiant intent, the globalist Left-which many state governors are—swiped Holy Week and Easter from the unsuspecting masses and then considered themselves to be on an unstoppable roll.

The rot of Liberal governors has unfortunately spread to other lands, including to the country next door where Canada Day celebrations have already been cancelled by the Justin Trudeau-led feds.  Government ‘leaders’ like Ontario Premier Doug Ford rushed off into CYA territory where small business owners have already been evicted by landlords when they couldn’t—having already been cut off from their businesses—come up with the rent.

Infuriatingly to the left,  government edict could not stop uncountable millions from respectfully honoring their war dead during yesterday’s Memorial Day ceremonies.

Leftist governors are undoubtedly now working on the proverbial monkey wrench to ruin upcoming July 4th celebrations. Only time will tell how successful they might be.

We keep reading in the Media how depression has hit the masses kept on lockdown.  Humans suffer psychological damage when kept from being with their families, believers left in a state of yearning when locked out of their houses of worship.  In this era of Clinical Depression, suicides are on the rise.

The only thing that can be taken for granted is that the Left will do whatever possible to keep the Lockdown in place until after November’s presidential election.  It’s the only thing left for them in stealing the election from President Donald Trump.

That will give them time for Mrs. Barack Obama to succeed with her bogus “When We All Vote’ initiative to turn Election 2020 into a total mail-in vote one—an initiative she deceitfully claims is: “NON-PARTISAN!

Surely of interest to note that it was her co-chair Tom Hanks was one of the first to come down with COVID-19, among other ‘firsters’ Pope Francis, and high-ranking members of the Iranian Government.

Talking about swipers, it was deceitful doctors Tony Fauci and Deborah Birx who took full credit for ‘social distancing’ when they really swiped the idea from a then 14-year-old New Mexico high school student who never got to shout: “Stop thief!”

“A 15-year-old New Mexico high school sophomore says she’s discovered closing schools would be the best way to halt a bird flu pandemic. (Medical XPress, May 9, 2006)

“Laura Glass of Albuquerque, N.M., is one of nearly 1,500 students taking part in this week’s Intel International Science and Engineering Fair being held in Indianapolis. The students compete for $1.5 million in scholarships and prizes based on their work.

“Glass created a virtual town of 10,000 people to simulate a bird flu pandemic, the Albuquerque Journal reported. She then computed how many people each person came into close contact with daily.

“She found most teenagers came into close contact with about 140 people daily, the most of any group, with middle and high school students having the greatest potential of spreading the disease.

“In her simulation, adults bring the disease into the community and infect their children. “From there,” she told the Journal, “it spreads like crazy once it gets (into) … the schools.”

“In one simulation in her virtual city of 10,000 people, about half the population became infected. But Glass found closing schools reduced that number to 500.”

In order to see clearly through what the Media and Hollywood-supported Left are up to, look into their poisonous symbol called ‘The Mask’.

Black-masked Joe and Jill Biden display it best:

As savvy Noah Pollck Tweeted yesterday:

“In this outdoor setting where he was only physically close to his wife, masks were completely unnecessary. But masks have become a form of political signaling for the left, an expression of virtuous obedience to the lockdown and hostility to Trump. So the Bidens wore them.”

Before the Bidens it was Hollywood groupie Dr. Fauci wearing a ginormous mask in every frame standing behind President Trump at the last President’s Task Force in the White House Rose Garden.

Meanwhile, don’t anybody expect to be let out of Lockdown until after Nov. 3, 2020—the real date when desperado Dems will set world masses free.

May 27 2020

Demockracy: A More Sophisticated Tyranny


“Mr. Kenney, make Canada a democracy again.”

Mark Gray image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—May 26, 2020

Demockracy: A More Sophisticated Tyranny

Democracy:

  1. government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system.

Apparently, Canadians enjoy such a form of government. If so, that’s news to the 20 indigenous bands whose elected chiefs signed agreements to help build the Coastal GasLink pipeline.  The bands voted to choose their representatives. The Chiefs voted for a huge project that would provide opportunity, revenue, and good paying jobs to their communities. Business would flourish. Taxes would flow. Win-win-win. A perfect example of government by the people. Textbook democracy.

Demockracy:

  1. government over the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the government and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under an ideologically corrupt electoral system.

The Trudeau Liberals, however, pipeline and prosperity haters that they are, had a problem. How could they shut down the pipeline and not look like they were intentionally harming indigenous peoples who voted for it? They found the solution in the unelected Wet’suwet’en Hereditary “chiefs”, a few of whom objected to the project. The Liberals, with plenty of support from the media, chose the unelected chiefs to speak for the bands, essentially rendering the band member’s vote and the Chief’s decisions meaningless. Textbook demockracy.

“Experts” own your vote.

The Wet’suwet’en Hereditary chiefs did not usurp the band member’s votes themselves, they were simply a proxy for the real vote stealer, climate “experts” whose model predictions, like the COVID-19 predictions, have failed to materialize. Our big mistake is believing the models are meant to reflect reality. They aren’t, they are purposely designed to generate existential threats. The “experts” then say, “we’re all going to die unless we do something drastic”. The government, well, their hands are tied. Who are they to defy the “experts”? They don’t really want to implement policy that transfers wealth and freedom from the people to the rulers, they’re forced to in order to save lives.

It’s a beautiful scam that allows government to assume absolute power while delegating responsibility to the “experts” whose opinion now matters more than our votes. It is a much more elegant path to power than gulags or firing squads. Demockracy is a sophisticated form of oppression. A kinder, gentler tyranny.

Political ideology is irrelevant. Both progressive and conservative governments bowed to the “expert’s” demands to shut down our economies and lockdown the people. None questioned the accuracy of the models. None dared defy the new overlords, the “expert” class who keep getting everything wrong but still keep their exalted status. How does that work?

The media choose the “experts”

Think about it. What expert comes to mind when you think about climate change? The IPCC? Greta? The WWF, perhaps? How is it that a trace gas that comprises a mere .04% of the atmosphere, a substance we exhale with each breath, a component necessary for life on earth, can become a toxic climate killer with a greater climatic impact than the sun? Was there a debate? No. The media decided there was a crisis and they determine who is and isn’t a climate expert. If you agree with the consensus you are worthy, if you don’t, you’re a climate denier regardless of your PHD and 30 years working and teaching in the field.

The climate models predicted the end of polar ice and a burning planet. They were proven wrong years ago, and are still wrong, but the climate “experts” who agree, the all-powerful consensus, are still relied upon by our governments to shape climate policy. Consensus and science are mutually exclusive terms. A consensus has zero scientific value, none. However, it provides the “expert” opinion favoured by demockracies so it’s here to stay.

The COVID modellers are already proven wrong but their expertise is still shaping policy. The truth that COVID-19 is a bad flu that targets the elderly is coming out. Even the CDC admits it has a remarkably low death rate.

What would be really nice is if leaders like Ontario Premier Doug Ford and Kenney looked at the new CDC numbers and asked themselves, hey, what are we doing here? It’s ludicrous to close schools, playgrounds, and parks. It’s unnecessary to shut down business. Social distancing and masks are pointless. We are ending COVID policing, a policy doing grave damage to the relationship between society and authority, and we are opening up immediately.

It would be even better if they asked the media why news feeds remain filled with concerns about society re-opening, fears about a second wave, worry about people violating social distancing, the need for testing, vaccines, and contact tracing? Why don’t they throw the declining death rate in the media’s face and ask why they insist Canadians suffer further harm?

Our leader’s inability or unwillingness to step up is disconcerting. Their continued reliance on “experts” who are nothing of the sort and their whimpering acquiescence to a media who divorced the truth long ago is pushing people to the brink.

Taking Freedom Back

We the people are beginning to understand that if we want to live in freedom, we’ll have to step outside our comfort zone and demand it. The growing protests are a start, but they won’t change the flawed infrastructure of our demockracy.

Fledging groups like “Unify The People” are forming with the goal of declaring provincial independence and sovereignty. They are regular people tired of demockratic tyranny. The battle is on.

Calgarian Donna Ferolie has filed suit against the Federal government claiming that Frederick Haultain never signed Alberta into Confederation. Jason Kenney says he wants a fair deal and if Donna is right, he has all the leverage he needs to create a new, fair Canadian Confederation that respects the rights and freedoms of the people. Mr. Kenney, make Canada a democracy again.

May 27 2020

In my opinion, Gov. Cooper is saying to Republicans, not in my state


If Gov. Cooper refuses to completely reopen the state, drop his draconian restrictions, before August, then I can say with certainty that he kept restrictions in place to force the convention to move to another state

Charles Wills image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—May 26, 2020

Gov. Cooper is saying to Republicans, not in my state

Back in March, Democrat Gov. Roy Cooper of North Carolina announced a statewide stay-at-home lock down order that was supposed to last for only 30 days. According to Cooper, restricting freedom of movement was necessary to curtail the spread of coronavirus and prevent hospitals from being overrun with patients. Cooper ordered people to stay in their homes, and businesses to close, and I reiterate, for only 30 days.

Moreover, Cooper had already ordered all schools to close through mid-May, banned gatherings of more than 10 people, ordered hair salons, gyms and movie theaters to close, and ordered restaurants to stop dine-in service. Cooper shut down all businesses that he didn’t deem essential, and required individuals outdoors to stay 6 feet apart.

I suspect Cooper, a partisan Democrat

Cooper’s stay at home order should have ended before May, and if it had, he could have claimed complete success. As a matter of fact, far too many hospitals and medical facilities had to layoff staff. Hospitals were not overwhelmed with patients. In fact, some hospitals were operating with a skeleton staff, no doctors to speak of, or patients either. But that didn’t ease Cooper’s restrictions on freedom and self determination.

So far, Cooper has only agreed to allow restaurants and other service oriented businesses to open with restrictions on capacity. Bars, nightclubs, gyms and fitness facilities, playgrounds, bowling alleys and entertainment facilities, such as movie theaters, were ordered to remain closed.Cooper placed restrictions on religious services, but they were shot down by a Federal Judge, so there’s no restrictions on religious services.

All other gatherings are restricted to a maximum of 10 people indoors and no more than 25 outdoors, and that’s concerning to the President and Republican Convention planners. Cooper’s restrictions make it impossible to hold the Republican Convention in North Carolina.

Moreover, Cooper knows the convention can not take place in North Carolina with the restrictions he has in place. If he continues to refuse to commit to drop his arbitrary restrictions on gatherings before August, the Republican Convention will have to move to another state, and that seems to be what Cooper really wants. In my opinion, Gov. Cooper is saying to Republicans, ‘Not in my state’.

In fact, if Cooper had kept his word in the beginning, the state would already be open for business. I suspect Cooper, a partisan Democrat, will try to justify extending his arbitrary restrictions on gatherings through August, when the Republican convention is scheduled to take place in Charlotte.

Cooper’s extended shutdown has already caused massive damage to the economy

If the convention has to move to another state, it will be detrimental to the welfare of the people of North Carolina. Cooper’s extended shutdown has already caused massive damage to the economy and the well-being of the people of North Carolina. North Carolina desperately needs the economic boost and return of jobs that the convention will bring to the state.

As a matter of fact, the Republican Convention will bring an infusion of desperately needed cash to hotels, restaurants, airlines and car rental companies that employ North Carolinians. The convention will bring jobs and desperately needed business to North Carolina.

If Gov. Cooper refuses to completely reopen the state, drop his draconian restrictions, before August, then I can say with certainty that he kept restrictions in place to force the convention to move to another state. I say that because we all know that viruses do not spread during the summer months.

May 27 2020

Is Gates Stupid or Very Clever with Vaccines?


Armstrong Economics Blog/Climate

Re-Posted May 27, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

QUESTION: Dear Mr Armstrong
I was in a discussion with a friend about current affairs – me, against Bill Gates and the likes and him, taking a more neutral stance. He asked if I watched some or anything he actually said. I said yes, well at least what you have posted I have watched in its entirety. I remember when you wrote about how to consider the position of the other side, even (or especially) when one it is opposed as to being the perceived enemy, be it Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump or Kim Jong Un. Now for me it Bill Gates these days. So my friend challenged me when he said that Bill’s view is that „a certain health standard (e.g. Through vaccination) would help less developed countries having to rely on large families for existential (= security) reason, therefore it would solve overpopulation…”. That certainly is way that I could not really argue against, was I to remember my Polish grandmother and siblings and how they had to essentially survive those days making their number count and work hard today to even make ends meet the next.

So I looked into this, what Bill Gates said about this (and luckily found a short video) where says precisely what I got to hear from my friend:
What is your view about this – would a certain level (albeit not reached via the almighty Socialism) of health and wealth globally make an end to the debate of overpopulation (which I anyway think is absurd for that matter, basing on that book by Malthus) and would that actually constitute a viable/true „thing” Bill Gates is pursuing (Here he comes, the savior of the poor and overpopulating)?

I am just trying to figure out how would I behave in such a position….
Thank you for all your work that driven NOT by profit and personal gain!

JL

ANSWER: Either Bill Gates is amazingly ignorant, or he is engaging in sophistry to sell his population-climate change agenda. The mistake people are making here is they are judging the third world on our own. What he is saying is that vaccinating everyone will mean they have a healthier child so they will need fewer children, which is absolutely a joke. The population naturally declines ONLY with economic advancement.

This has been the case from ancient times when the Roman Emperor Augustus (27 BC-14 AD) passed family laws to force men to marry because the Latin population was declining. The birth rates have declined substantially in Japan, Europe, and America with the rise in the economy. Russia was paying $9,000 for women to have children because the population declines only with economic advancement.

The reason is very simple. In an agrarian society, you have more children for they are your retirement and they take care of you in your old age and allow the farm to keep producing. You would typically have several children because also the mortality rate was high. The man was typically twice the age of his bride before 1800 because he had to FIRST prove himself by getting the farm, chickens, and house to show he could afford a family.

The age difference declined with the industrial revolution to the point it was only 50% older by 1900, dropping to perhaps 10-15 years older by 1930. It was after the Great Depression with the introduction of socialism that the age difference fell to near zero because the boy no longer needed to prove himself – we just love each other became the justification.

Postwar (1945), the government was there, not just for social benefits, but the introduction of Social Security also relieved the children of the burden of having to take care of their parents — that became the government’s job. This changed the very structure of families in the United States as was the case in Europe.

Where Gates’ proposition falls apart is that these third world countries are still in the agrarian stage and they lack the economic development that reduces the population. They need the children to run the farm and they need them for retirement for they lack such pension schemes. Just look at what happened in China with the one-child rule. The boy left for the economic lure of the big city, leaving the parents alone without support. Back in 2013, China had to pass a law that the children must visittheir parents. Elderly couples began importing girls from Southeast Asia to take care of them and they would leave them the property.

Sorry, I cannot believe Gates is that stupid. I believe it is merely his excuse for the depopulation of the earth and his father was a member of Eugenics which believed in the superiority of the Nordic-Anglo-Saxon Race genetically and were actively seeking to reduce the population of darker skinned people where Gates has focuses – India & Africa.

There is absolutely no support whatsoever for his claim that vaccinating children will make them healthier so they will have less. Donate food if that is really the issue – but there is no profit in that.

Their economic conditions in the third world do not support that conclusion. If he was really serious about that, then help them become industrialized and provide free food. Or wait, let me see, that would impact his climate change.

May 27 2020

Thuringia in Germany Abandons Virus Restrictions


Armstrong Economics Blog/Disease

Posted May 27, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

The free state of Thuringia in Germany, which has 2.15 million inhabitants, has declared that it will abolish all national corona protection regulations as of June 6. This means that the previous rules on minimum social distances, wearing masks, and contact restrictions will no longer apply. The socialists in the SPD have criticized the planned relaxation of the corona requirements. The SPD thinks the people are stupid and just still need clarity. Meanwhile, Bavaria’s state government said it is “horrified that elementary protective measures should now be abandoned,” according to Florian Herrmann, who is the head of the Bavarian State Chancellery, according to the German Press Agency (dpa). The Greens have also come out against any relaxation.

We can see that it is the environmentalists and the Socialists banning together to try to keep society divided and the economy in a downward spiral to achieve their end goals — a New Green World Order where paper money is eliminated and taxes can then be imposed arbitrarily. They fail to understand that most revolutions take place over tax increases. They are insane with their objectives and we see the federal government claiming it is willing to only help environmentally directed companies.

RUMOR

We have reliable rumors behind the curtain coming from Europe that beginning in 2021, all foreign citizens will be required to undergo a pre-screening and registration process, which will be known as the European Travel Information and Authorization System (ETIAS) before entering European Schengen-zone countries. Not all EU members are part of this Schengen agreement – notably Britain, Scotland, and Ireland. While this system was on schedule before the coronavirus, what is being suggested is that this should now include a health certificate to prove you have been vaccinated to visit Europe by Bill Gates.

If there is one way to kill tourism in Europe, they seem to have discovered that perfect law. Instead of the old Berlin Wall, it will become the European Wall.

Imposing this type of health clearance on top of a pre-clearance to travel will most likely only accelerate the breakup of the EU as Southern Europe is thrown into an economic depression killing all tourism as other member states are already telling their people not to leave their home state for fear of the virus.