Beijing Shifts Negotiation Goalposts – Demand Current Tariff Removal or No Negotiation…


Before President Trump and Chairman Xi Jinping met in Osaka at the G20, Beijing requested the removal of current tariffs as a contingency for a Trump-Xi meeting.  The tariffs are causing two issues: (1) China is bleeding cash via subsidies to offset the tariffs and retain export position; (2) ancillary manufacturing companies are exiting China to avoid tariffs into the U.S. market.

Understanding how the static dynamic -he intentionally created- was favorable to the U.S., President Trump reasserted that current tariffs were not going to be removed.

After the Osaka meeting, President Trump and Chairman Xi agreed to re-open talks between the two teams with no new tariffs; however, as stated before the G20 summit the preexisting tariffs would remain.

Beijing is increasingly recognizing how the current status is disfavorable to their economy; and asserting that no further trade talks can take place until the U.S. promises to remove all tariffs as part of a completed agreement.

(SCMP) China has insisted that all tariffs on Chinese imports added by the United States during the trade war must be scrapped immediately as part of any deal to end the year-long conflict, which would require the Trump administration to give up its position that some levies remain in place even after an agreement is reached.

US President Donald Trump agreed to pause placing new tariffs of up to 25 per cent on an additional US$300 billion of Chinese imports not yet subject to taxes after his meeting with Xi Jinping at the G20 summit last weekend in Japan.

But for any deal to be reached, US tariffs of 25 per cent on US$250 billion of Chinese imports that remain in place must be removed, said Ministry of Commerce spokesman Gao Feng on Thursday, underscoring that there are still many issues to be resolved to end the conflict as it approaches its one-year anniversary on Saturday. (read more)

The position of Beijing is tenuous. President Trump was not inclined to even begin further talks; the status-quo actually favors the U.S. position. Few companies with operations that require access to the U.S. market are willing to commit to any further China investment while the trade conflict exists.  A process of “deglobalization” or regional shift is underway.

The U.S. economy remains strong.  As a result of economic nationalism, right now the U.S. is the wealthiest consumer base in the globe.  Many companies are re-positioning to be closest to their most valuable consumers, and there is massive proactive investment in Mexico as passage of the USMCA trade agreement is likely.

Justin from Canada held a political strategy session with Nancy Pelosi and looks like he agreed to postpone any Canadian Parliamentary vote until after Pelosi passes the USMCA in the U.S. congress.  It’s likely Pelosi wants to wait until after the 2020 election to avoid giving President Trump a win.  However, this means Justin from Canada has agreed to allow his own economy to further collapse just to assist the OrangeManBad objective.

Yesterday as the U.S. celebrated another 224,000 new jobs created, Canada posted their June results:

Spencer Fernando 🇨🇦@SpencerFernando

Canadian Economy Loses Over 2,000 Jobs, Unemployment Rate Rises – Spencer Fernando

Economists had expected a gain of 10,000 jobs. The latest jobs report shows the Canadian economy losing 2,200 jobs in June. The unemployment rate rose,

spencerfernando.com

271 people are talking about this
Yes, Justin is rolling the dice and hoping he can win reelection without having a positive USMCA outcome to point toward.   However, the China trade issue actually dilutes any negative value Pelosi and Justin can generate by holding up the USMCA.

As a direct outcome of how Trump has positioned the U.S. trade strategy there are two simultaneous issues defeating the Trudeau-Pelosi scheme.

Specifically because Trump created: (1) a process of deglobalization away from China; and (2) a regional investment process in Mexico; President Trump now holds key leverage in both directions.   Part of that leverage is seen in the political shift within Mexico to assist on the Central American migration issue.   The potential for national security tariffs on Mexico is now less than 60 days away (POTUS gave Lopez-Obrador a 90-day corrective window).

There is no current reason for President Trump to change the stalemate with China, and Pelosi’s scheme to hold-up the USMCA only makes things worse for Beijing.  Without the USMCA ratified President Trump’s best play, to ensure strategic trade objectives are accomplished, is to delay any China talks or agreement.  Doing nothing is a strategic decision.

The longer this goes on the weaker Beijing becomes.  Simultaneously the longer this goes on the more multinational corporations will look toward the U.S. for direct investment, -OR- look at Mexico as a safe hub, close to the U.S. market, where they can avoid controversy.

If Beijing follows through with a threat to disengage until current tariffs are removed, they are only hurting their own economy.  It is only because President Trump has guided the trade reset to this specific place in time that this current dynamic is possible.

As a consequence, the tariffs will continue until panda behavior improves.

Don’t look for Team U.S.A to make any compromise.

National Quinnipiac Poll – Biden 22%, Harris 20%, Warren 14%, Sanders 13%…


The latest National Quinnipiac Poll of Democrat presidential candidates reflects a significant surge by Kamala Harris, a static position for Elizabeth Warren, and a slight drop for Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders.

Kamala Harris went from 7% in April to 20% in July. Elizabeth Warren went from 15% in April to 14% in July.  Joe Biden went from 24% in April to 22% in July.  Bernie Sanders went from 16% in April to 13% in July. That’s the top four.

Certainly Harris seems to be the biggest winner from the first debate; however, the biggest loser is not Joe Biden.  In April -at the time of his campaign launch- Pete Buttigieg was at 14%, now he’s down to 4%.  Buttigieg is the biggest loser.  As anticipated, all other candidates are essentially irrelevant.

Quinnipiac – […] “Round 1 of the Democratic debates puts Senator Kamala Harris and former Vice President Joe Biden on two different trajectories, as support for Harris surges but continues to slip for Biden.

Biden’s once commanding lead has evaporated. There are other red flags for him in areas where he still leads, including double digit drops among Democrats and Democratic leaners who view him as the best leader, or as the best candidate to defeat President Trump in 2020,” said Quinnipiac University Polling Analyst Mary Snow.

Democrats and Democratic leaners were also asked which candidate they thought had the best chance of winning against President Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election, regardless of who they support in the primary. Biden tops the field with 42 percent, which is a drop from the 56 percent that he received on April 30. Harris comes in a distant second with 14 percent in today’s poll, up from 2 percent in April. Sanders receives 13 percent, and no other candidate reaches double digits.  (See full polling results)

The media is most certainly doing what they can to lift Kamala Harris, a review of most media stories show a narrative of appreciating value amid the influential social circle of mainstream democrat media reporters.

Biden and Bernie are fraught with the problem of toxic male whiteness as expressed by the overwhelming majority of activists within the DNC ranks.

Bernie currently has the Communist, Socialist, Antifa and Occupy groups defending him. Unfortunately for the jackbooted moonbats, the ‘free stuff’ alignment with AOC is now a liability.  The more AOC goes stupid the more it hurts the dem-socialists.

Joe Biden is a candidate adrift in a massive political ocean sitting on a pool float, trying to survive.

Elizabeth Warren has the beltway FemGen limo-liberals as a pretty solid constituency; however attempts to grow into the ‘ima-git-me-a-beer‘ base are fraught with a lack of authenticity.

Kamala Harris has assembled all of the disparate one percent groups into a sizable enough coalition of professional grievance to outlast Warren’s lack of minority status.

By the end of August the Final Four will make up the viability field.  Currently that looks like Biden, Harris, Warren and Bernie.  However, as Biden and Bernie are dispatched the Harris -vs- Warren situation will come down to drop-out endorsements.

Obviously momentum is a temporary condition and things could change, but Biden needs to give a good performance at the next debate or his deflating pool float will drown him.

Here’s the trend data specific to Quinnipiac polling:

Sketchy Business – RCI Review Questions Unsubstantiated Conclusions of Mueller Report…


Real Clear Investigations has a deep dive into the underpinnings of the Mueller report surrounding the sketchy conclusions about Russian interference.  What Real Clear outlines parallels our own review where most of the substance claimed by Andrew Weissmann, Robert Mueller and Rod Rosenstein is essentially baseless.

(RCI) […] The report claims that the interference operation occurred “principally” on two fronts: Russian military intelligence officers hacked and leaked embarrassing Democratic Party documents, and a government-linked troll farm orchestrated a sophisticated and far-reaching social media campaign that denigrated Hillary Clinton and promoted Trump.

But a close examination of the report shows that none of those headline assertions are supported by the report’s evidence or other publicly available sources. They are further undercut by investigative shortcomings and the conflicts of interest of key players involved: (read more)

LOL: Progressives Complain Trump Not Projecting American Strength


Published on Jul 2, 2019

Progressives in the media and politics complain that Kim Jong Un is playing President Trump, who settles for a self-aggrandizing photo opp, but is not projecting American strength (LOL). The Left also criticizes Trump for using the North Korea summit and G-20 meeting to cozy up to strongmen like Kim, Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping. Is the U.S. President an “agent of unpredictability”, or does he understand better than President Obama or his predecessors how to create global stability? This episode of Bill Whittle Now is just one of 48 shows per month produced by the Members at BillWhittle.com, whose mission to advance time-tested conservative principles is important enough for them to invest their own funds in it. They also run their own exclusive private blog as a refuge for reasoned thought, civil dialogue and lots of laughter. Give these people a month and you’ll never want to leave them. Try a 30-day risk-free Membership. If you don’t think it’s worth more than your investment, just write us for a full refund. Start your assessment now at https://BillWhittle.com/register/

 

The Gracious R.B.G.: Ginsburg Praises Kavanaugh for Historic First for Women


Published on Jul 5, 2019

Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg praises her new colleague, Brett Kavanaugh, for being the first Supreme Court Justice to hire an all-female staff. Bill Whittle rarely finds anything to celebrate in Ginsburg’s actions or public statements, but this time she’s not only the Notorious R.B.G., but the Gracious R.B.G.. Yet CBS News misses a crucial detail in this story of historic firsts for women. If you value conservative principles, fair commentary, civil dialogue and reasoned thought, your people are waiting to welcome you among the ranks of the Members who make this show. Join us today at https://BillWhittle.com/register/

Nike Drops Betsy Ross Flag When Kaepernick Cries “Racist”, Arizona Drops Nike


Published on Jul 3, 2019

Growing Inequality: Can Democrats Harness Wealth Gap to Win White House in 2020?


Published on Jul 3, 2019

Although the country is in a long-term economic growth phase, Fed data shows that middle-income people are now less likely to own homes, or stocks. Meanwhile, “the one percent” are doing great. When it comes to elections, It’s the economy, stupid. But even thought more people have jobs now, can Democrats harness the wealth gap to win the White House in 2020? Thanks to the Members at BillWhittle.com for making this episode, and 47 others, each month. If you’d like to learn more about this extraordinary group of conservative thought leaders, and consider joining them, visit https://BillWhittle.com/register/

 

Report: New Horowitz Witness, Likely Kathleen Kavalec, Agrees to Talk to IG Investigators…


In a new report Fox News journalist Catherine Herridge outlines a “reluctant witness” who has recently agreed to cooperate with DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz and his review of potential FISA abuse by the Obama DOJ and FBI.

Fox News – Key witnesses sought for questioning by Justice Department Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz early in his investigation into alleged government surveillance abuse have come forward at the 11th hour, Fox News has learned.

Sources familiar with the matter said at least one witness outside the Justice Department and FBI started cooperating — a breakthrough that came after Attorney General William Barr ordered U.S. Attorney John Durham to lead a separate investigation into the origins of the bureau’s 2016 Russia case that laid the foundation for Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe.

[…] Late-breaking information is known to delay such investigations. Horowitz’s office similarly encountered new evidence late in the process of the IG review into law enforcement decisions during the 2016 Hillary Clinton email investigation.

In this case, additional FISA information came to light late in the process – including October 2016 contact (first reported by The Hill and confirmed by Fox News) between a senior State Department official and a former British spy Christopher Steele, who authored the infamous and salacious anti-Trump dossier. (read more)

While the “reluctant witness” is not specifically identified by Herridge in her reporting, as you can see above there is enough background material to identify it is likely former State Department official Kathleen Kavalec.

Kathleen Kavalec was the Deputy Assistant Secretary – Department of State, Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs, serving under Victoria Nuland and covered Russia as part of her State Dept. duties.  Kavalec was contacted by Christopher Steele prior to the FISA application on Carter Page being sought by the FBI and DOJ.  Kavalic wrote a series of notes and emails to the FBI undercutting the dossier central claims made by Steele.

The original reporting on the Kavalec emails and Steele contact was done by John Solomon.  Here’s the basic background that explains why Inspector General Michael Horowitz would be interested in interviewing Kathleen Kavalec.

According to a leak provided to John Solomon, State Department information -deconstructing Chris Steele- was presented to FBI Agent Peter Strzok a week before they used Steele’s sketchy dossier to prop up the FBI FISA application on Carter Page.

John Solomon – […] The officials declined to say what the FBI did with the information about Steele after it reached Strzok’s team, or what the email specifically revealed. A publicly disclosed version of the email has been heavily redacted in the name of national security.

While much remains to be answered, the email exchange means FBI supervisors knew Steele had contact with State and had reason to inquire what he was saying before they sought the warrant. If they had inquired, agents would have learned Steele had admitted to Kavalec he had been leaking to the news media, had a political deadline of Election Day to get his information public and had provided demonstrably false intelligence in one case, as I reported last week. (read more)

It’s almost guaranteed the reason Kavelec’s email to the FBI was redacted is specifically because Ms. Kavelec used her State Dept. portal to check on travel records and noted the “Michael Cohen in Prague” story was false.  Kavalec would have easy access to State Dept. travel records.

Chris Steele told Ms. Kavalec about Trump’s attorney Michael Cohen traveling to Prague to communicate/coordinate with the Russians.  Kavalec made note of the claim:

(Page #11, pdf link)

Michael Cohen has denied ever traveling to Prague.  Special Counsel Robert Mueller has supported Cohen on this issue; passport records show Cohen has never traveled to Prague. It appears Ms. Kavalec checked her State Dept. travel records and confirmed the same.

However, the CURRENT FBI wants to hide Ms. Kavalec’s warning/notification that Steele was delivering false information about Cohen traveling to Prague:

(Page #2, pdf source – Kavalec email)

So put it all together.  Chris Steele was producing the dossier for the FBI to use.  Steele told State Dept. official Kavalec about the same information in his dossier.  The State Dept. checked, and found out the information was false. The State Dept. warned the FBI.  However, the FBI ignored the warning; and a week later used the dossier in the application for a retroactive Title-1 surveillance warrant against U.S. Person Carter Page.

To cover themselves; and because the claim was so central to the purpose of the Steele Dossier; the FBI then redacted the State Dept. warning about Michael Cohen traveling to Prague in the public email from the State Department.

Worse yet, in the application itself the FBI said the information proving Carter Page was an agent of a foreign power came from the State Dept:

(Page #2 Carter Page FISA Application – pdf source)

The false claim about Cohen’s travel to Prague has been discussed here for well over a year. [January 2018]

So, the question is:  Why is the FBI so damned committed to this Steele Dossier?

That answer is simple.  In October 2016, they needed the dossier to get the FISA warrant.  They needed the 2016 FISA warrant to cover-up for all of the unauthorized and illegal surveillance activity that was already underway throughout 2016.

The Russian election interference narrative; the use of Joseph Mifsud, Stefan Halper, the London and Australian embassy personnel; Erika Thompson, Alexander Downer, U.S. DIA officials; everything around Crossfire Hurricane; and everything after to include the construct of the Steele Dossier; all of it was needed for the creation of an ‘after-the-fact‘  plausible justification to cover-up what Mike Rogers discovered in early 2016, AND the downstream unmasked records that existed in the Obama White House SCIF.

Fusion GPS was not hired in April 2016 to research Donald Trump.  The intelligence community was already doing surveillance and spy operations. They already knew everything about the Trump campaign.

The Obama intelligence community needed Fusion GPS to give them a justification for pre-existing surveillance operations.  Fusion fulfilled that objective by contracting for the Steele Dossier.

That’s why the FBI, and later the Mueller team, were/are so strongly committed to, and defending, the formation of the Steele Dossier and its dubious content.  Once they had the dossier in hand the FBI proceeded forward for an ex post facto FISA warrant.

The goal was surveillance authority. The FBI used the Carter Page FISA application. The FBI already knew Carter Page; essentially Carter Page was irrelevant, what they needed was the dossier in the system, and the FISA authority as justification to execute the “insurance policy”.

Damn, is Bill Barr Corrupt Also? – DOJ Files New ‘Last Minute’ Motion to Keep Comey FBI Memo Content Hidden From Public…


In our opinion the content of the diary by former FBI Director James Comey, as outlined in what has formally been called “The Comey Memos”, is devastating to the U.S. Department of Justice and FBI.   How do we know? Because the FBI is fighting like hell to keep even descriptions of the memo(s) content from becoming public.

Rather complex backstory with citations HERE and HERE and HERE.

In the background of what was The Mueller Investigation, there was a FOIA case where the FBI was fighting to stop the release of the Comey memos.  Within that courtroom fight Mueller’s lead FBI agent David Archey wrote a series of declarations to the court describing the content of the memos and arguing why they should be kept classified.

The FOIA fight shifted.  The plaintiffs argued for public release of the content of the FBI agent’s descriptions, now known as the “Archey Declarations”.

After a lengthy back-and-forth legal contest, on June 7th Judge James E Boasberg agreed to allow the FBI to keep the Comey memo content hidden, but instructed the DOJ/FBI to release the content of the Archey Declarations.

Today, the U.S. Department of Justice -under Attorney General Bill Barr- while waiting until the last minute (28 days since prior ruling), filed a motion [full pdf below] to block the release of the Archey Declarations, despite the June 7th court order.

Again, if transparency in conduct of the DOJ and FBI during 2016 is the expressed goal of Attorney General Bill Barr, then his current department fighting to keep descriptions of FBI memorandum hidden from public review runs exactly counter to that intent.

This DOJ activity does not bode well for a narrative of Bill Barr is an honest broker.  This is an example of how to cover-up material that is damaging to the institution.

To be fair, Attorney General Bill Barr may not be aware the United States Department of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch, is fighting this court ordered release.

However, the DOJ Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division is Jody Hunt.  That name might be familiar to you because Jody Hunt was Jeff Sessions former chief-of-staff.

Asst. AG Jody Hunt most certainly knows his office is fighting to keep the FBI descriptions of the Comey memos hidden from the public.

Despite the original media FOIA lawsuit coming from CNN -vs- DOJ, there is no-one in the MSM covering this story.   Here is today’ DOJ filing:

.

Here’s the background on the June 7th, 2019, ruling as we shared at the time:

Judge Boasberg was deciding what could be publicly released, meaning current redactions removed, based on two connected events: (#1) The content of the Comey Memos; and (#2) the declarations of lead FBI agent for Robert Mueller’s special counsel, David Archey, in describing those memos.  CNN had filed a lawsuit to gain full access.

[Note: the descriptions of the Comey memos by FBI agent David Archey are known as the “Archey Declarations” – Read Here.]

For those who may not be aware, there are so many memos (dozens) when assembled they seem to make up an actual diary of moment-by-moment events, during the FBI investigation of Donald Trump, as documented by FBI Director James Comey.

♦ In the issue of the redactions within the Comey Memos, the judge doesn’t remove them. Some are ordered to be removed, some are approved to stay in place.  The Comey memo aspect, and the redaction decision, is basically a splitting of the baby 50/50.  It will be interesting, but meh, maybe not too much detail. – CNN ARTICLE

(Pdf Link)

The issues argued by the FBI lawyers to keep the Comey memos hidden surround sources and methods.  The judge generally agreed to the potential for compromise, but also outlined several sections of redactions within the Comey memos where that argument doesn’t hold up.  [The judge has read the fully unredacted memo content.]

♦ However, on the issue of the Archey Declarations there’s an opportunity for some very interesting information to surface. Here’s an example of currently existing redactionswithin the Archey Declarations:

And stunningly, yes, STUNNINGLY, Judge Boasberg has ordered the Archey declarations to be fully released to the public WITHOUT REDACTIONS. See pages 34 and 35 of the ruling.

That means all those black boxes in the example above will be removed and CNN will be allowed the fully unredacted content of the declarations by FBI Agent David Archey.

This should be interesting.

Hopefully we don’t have to add Bill Barr’s picture to the graphic of corrupt DOJ and FBI officials; however, time is running out…

President Trump Impromptu Remarks Departing White House – (Video and Transcript)…


Chopper pressers are the best pressers.  Earlier today President Trump stopped to deliver remarks and answer questions from the assembled media prior to boarding Marine-One.

There is a ton of updated current event information in this chopper presser. [July 4th, Economics, Fed, China, Biden, Wilbur Ross, Census, G20, Trade Deals, etc.]  The full transcript is below the video.

.

[Transcript]  THE PRESIDENT: That’s a great crowd of people. We had a phenomenal crowd last night, and it was a fantastic evening for our country. You’re going to have a lot of people being recruited, I think, based on that. We’re going to have a lot of — a lot of people joining our military. And we really needed that.

Our job numbers are so good that the military has a hard time getting people. And I think, really, that you’re going to see a big spike. I’ve already heard it — a lot of people calling in. No place like our military. I think we showed that last night.

We had great numbers this morning. I think it was 224,000 jobs. Those were really unexpectedly good. And our country continues to do really well. Really, really well. So we’re very happy about it. I think we’re going to — we’re going to be breaking records.

If we had a Fed that would lower interest rates, we’d be like a rocket ship, but we’re paying a lot of interest and it’s unnecessary. But we don’t have a Fed that knows what they’re doing, so it’s one of those little things. But if we had a Fed that would lower rates, you would have a rocket ship.

When Obama — President Obama — was here, he paid close to zero interest rates. I’m paying real interest, and yet our economy is much better than it’s ever been. From Election Day, we’re over 50 percent increase, and we pay trillions and trillions of dollars — with a “T” — trillions. So we’re doing very well.

But last night was spectacular. Yes.

Q Mr. President, can you talk to me about infrastructure? Now that you’ve had some successes, are you willing to bring Democrats back to the table to talk about infrastructure — and, in particular, when it comes to rural broadband for your base?

THE PRESIDENT: Yeah. I would love rural broadband. We’re working on it. And I would love to have the Democrats come back and talk about infrastructure, talk about drug pricing.

We’re going to be announcing something very shortly — a favored nations clause. As you know, for years and years, other nations paid less for drugs than we do — sometimes by 60, 70 percent. We’re going to be — and we’re working on it right now. We’re working on a favored nations clause, where we pay whatever lowest nation’s price is.

Why should other nations, like Canada — but why should other nations pay much less than us? They’ve taken advantage of the system for a long time — pharma.

So we’re working on, right now, a favored nations clause, so that whatever the lowest nation is, anywhere in the world — or company — but the lowest nation or company. Then what happens is we will pay that amount, and that’s being worked on right now. We’re going to do it in the form of an executive order.

Q Are you going to issue an executive order on the census?

THE PRESIDENT: We’re thinking about doing that. It’s one of the ways; we have four or five ways we can do it. It’s one of the ways that we’re thinking about doing it very seriously. We’re doing well on the census.

Q Are you upset with Wilbur Ross over his handling?

THE PRESIDENT: No, he made a statement. He wrote something out. The judge didn’t like it. I have a lot of respect for Justice Roberts. But he didn’t like it. But he did say, “Come back.” Essentially, he said, “Come back.” That’s what he was saying.

Q But he had said they were dropping it.

THE PRESIDENT: So we’ll see what happens. We could also add an addition on so we can start the printing now and maybe do an addendum after we get a positive decision. So we’re working on a lot things, including an executive order.

Q Joe Biden called you a “bully” in that interview last night. What do you think of that?

THE PRESIDENT: I don’t think I’m bully at all. I just don’t like taking — being taken advantage of by other countries, by pharmaceutical companies, by all of the people that have taken advantage of this country.

REPORT THIS AD

You look at what Joe Biden has done with China. We’ve lost our shirts with China and now China is dying to make a deal. So — and we’re taking, by the way, billions and billions of dollars in tariffs are coming in — and China is paying for it, not our people.

So, if you look at what we’ve done, and if you look at what we’ve straightened out, the — I call it the “Obama-Biden mess.” We’re straightening it out, whether it’s North Korea — you were going to end up in a war with North Korea as sure as you’re standing there. And now the relationship is a good relationship. We’ll see what happens.

But as sure as you’re there, you were going to end up in a war with North Korea.

Q Mr. President, are you going to continue — are you going to hold the ICE raids that you said you gave a two-week break? Do you plan to move forward, and when?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I don’t call them “raids.” I say they came in illegally, and we’re bringing them out legally. These are people where we have the papers, we’ve gone through the court system. They’ll be starting fairly soon.

But I don’t call them “raids.” We’re removing people that have come in — all of these people over the years that have come in illegally — we are removing them and bringing them back to their country.

Q Were you sending any messages to our adversaries with the military celebration yesterday?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I don’t think of it in terms of that; we’re just celebrating our country. But there is nobody stronger. There’s nobody that has a military anywhere close to ours.

As you know, we spent $700 billion. When I took over the military, it was absolutely depleted. We had old planes, we had old jets, we had bad — I mean, just stuff that was tired. Now we have the finest jets in the world: the F-35; the F-18s — the new one. We have military equipment the likes of which we’ve never had. Building submarines, building aircraft carriers — all made in the USA. So it’s a double. It’s all made —

Now, I’m all about jobs. We had great job numbers today. But when it comes to the military, it’s not about jobs. We have to have the greatest in the world. There’s nobody that comes close. And our military now is just about the top — just about the best it’s ever been. There’s nobody that comes close to the power we have in our military.

What we have — and, in fact, if you look, our nuclear now is in great shape. We’ve renovated. We’ve fixed. We’re buying some new. Never want to use it. You never want to use it. But we have to be in a position that — we have to be in a position.

But our nuclear is in great shape. Our military now is in great shape.

Q Will you make it an annual event, based on your experience last night?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I can just tell you, those people that you see — there’s a lot of people in front of the White House — every one of them loved it. I would actually say — and I want to sort of give a little appreciation — the media, generally speaking, loved it. They loved the evening.

We had a lot of rain. I stood in the rain. The teleprompter went out, so I had —

Q Is that what happened with the airport comment in the Revolutionary War?

REPORT THIS AD

THE PRESIDENT: Yeah, the teleprompter went out. It kept going on. And then, at the end, it just went out. It went kaput. So I could have said — and, actually, right in the middle of that sentence, it went out. And that’s not a good feeling, when you’re standing in front of millions of millions of people on television, and — I don’t know what the final count was, but that went all the way back to the Washington Monument. And I guess the rain knocked out the teleprompter.

So — but, no, it’s not that. I knew the speech very well, so I was able to do it without a teleprompter. But the teleprompter did go out. And it was actually hard to look at anyway because there was rain all over it.

But, despite the rain, that was just a fantastic evening. I think people really had it. And I think a lot of people — you know, it was really a recruitment situation. A lot of people are going to be going our Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, Coast Guard.

Q Do you think the New York Attorney General should be fired?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, she campaigned on “I’m going to get Trump. I’m going to get Trump.” She never knew me. I never met her. I don’t know who she is. But she cam- — her whole campaign was that. And that’s illegal; you’re not allowed to do that. She knew nothing about me.

She campaigned — “Oh, I’m going to get Trump. I’m…” We have 100 clips, and so do you. And you can’t do that. Our system isn’t about that. Our system isn’t about, “Let’s see if we can find something.” You can’t do that.

But her whole campaign was “I’m going to get Trump. I’m going to get him.” You can’t do that.

Q (Inaudible.)

THE PRESIDENT: It would have to be a long time. You know what? It’s very interesting. After 500 witnesses, 2,500 subpoenas, every single person I know, practically, was called in one form of another — nothing.

And I’ll tell you what: Even with you people — you’re honest people — none of you could have withstood that. They would have found something. If there was a comma put in the wrong place, if there was period in the wrong location, they would have grabbed it. No collusion. No obstruction. After that, it’s almost — it’s amazing.

You know what it shows? It shows I’m a very honest guy.

Q (Inaudible.)

THE PRESIDENT: So China — so we’ll see what happens. They’re talking to us. They want to make a deal. But we had a deal, and they broke it. They broke the deal. They shouldn’t have broken it. I think if they had it to do again, they wouldn’t. Because, right now, we put very big tariffs on, and we have a lot more to put on if we want. But China broke a deal. We are talking to them. We’ll see what happens.

Q What about Iran? (Inaudible.)

THE PRESIDENT: We’ll see what happens with Iran. Iran has to be very, very careful.

Q (Inaudible.)

REPORT THIS AD

THE PRESIDENT: Say it.

Q Why did the Vice President cancel his trip the other day to New Hampshire?

THE PRESIDENT: You’ll know in about two weeks. There was a very — a very interesting problem that they had in New Hampshire. And I can’t tell you about it. It was a very — but it had nothing to do with White House. There was a problem up there. And I won’t go into what the problem was, but you’ll see in about a week or two.

Q Mr. President, how do you deal with immigration going forward? What’s your next step with the crisis on the southern border?

THE PRESIDENT: The southern border is being policed very well by Mexico. Mexico is doing far more than the Democrats — we all know it — because of tariffs, but they’ve been great. They’ve put 6,000 people. They have many of them there now on the southern border — their southern border.

On our southern border, which is the main border that you think of, they’re going to have anywhere between 16,000 and 21,000 troops. It’s had a big effect. They’ve only been there for about a week, where they actually had the troops. But it’s had a tremendous effect, tremendous impact. And you’ll see the numbers starting to come in very well.

Guatemala is going to be signing a safe third agreement. We’re talking to Mexico. But Mexico is really doing a good job, I have to say. Very — very big (inaudible).

But here’s the thing: When people come in illegally, and then it’s crowded — and I’ve seen some of those places, and they are run beautifully. They’re clean. They’re good. They do a great job.

Q That’s not what your government said.

THE PRESIDENT: They do a great job. They’re crowded because the Democrats will not give us any relief from these loopholes. We have loopholes that are so bad. We have asylum that’s so bad.

So these places are — many of them; not all of them, but many of them — they’re incredible. They’re really well run.

REPORT THIS AD

I’ll tell you what, and I said it yesterday: Border Patrol did not train to be doctors and nurses and janitors. That’s not what they trained to be. They trained to be Border Patrol. And that’s what they’re doing, and they’re doing a phenomenal job.

Because of the country, because we’re doing so well as a country — we never — we’ve never done this well. Two days ago, we hit the highest stock market number we’ve ever had in the history of our country. Our country is doing great. Unemployment is very low. We just came out with 224,000 new jobs. The numbers are unbelievable. And that’s bringing people up like they’ve never come up. Border Patrol and ICE have done a great job.

Now, people are being removed from the country. We’re removing them. We’re starting with the MS-13. We’ve taken out thousands of MS-13 and gangs. But we’ve never had an onslaught — and the reason they came up is because — and they come up — is because the country is doing well. They want jobs.

Q Your own government has a report that says those facilities are overcrowded, they’re dirty, and it’s a widespread problem. So what do you mean they’re “run beautifully”?

THE PRESIDENT: I think they do great job with those facilities. But do you know how it should be taken care of? Number one: Tell them not to come because it’s illegal. Very unfair to people that have been waiting on line for seven or eight years, and they’re about to be admitted, and they’ve studied and they know the country and the history and everything, and then a person comes in — walks in — and, all of the sudden, they’ve become a citizen or they’re allowed to stay.

So thousands and thousands of people will be legally removed from the country, and that process has started. And we’ve actually been doing that for a long time.

Q Mr. President, are you confident there are no undocumented immigrants working at your Bedminster property or other Trump golf properties?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, that I don’t know because I don’t run it. But I would say this: Probably every club in the United States has that because it seems to be, from what I understand, a way that people did business.

But we’ve ended — whatever they did, we have a very strict rule that — those rules are very strict. But it seems that every club, practically, in the United States — that’s the way they did business.

Q Mr. President, should Border Patrol agents be punished for mocking detained migrants and members of Congress in that private Facebook page?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I haven’t seen it. I will say this: I think that the Border Patrol has been treated very, very badly by certain members of Congress — very, very badly. For the most part, they’re very respected by Congress, but certain members of Congress say very bad things and lie and exaggerate. And Border Patrol people are tough people; they’re not happy about it.

Q Today, on the citizenship question, Mr. President — will you decide today on the citizenship question what route you’re going to take? The judge wants an answer today.

THE PRESIDENT: I just spoke with the Attorney General. We have a number of different avenues. We could use all of them or one. We’re doing very well on that issue. We’re spending 15 to 20 billion dollars on a census. We’re doing everything; we’re finding out everything about everybody. Think of it: 15 to 20 billion dollars, and you’re not allowed to ask them, “Are you a citizen?”

REPORT THIS AD

Q But will you decide today, sir?

THE PRESIDENT: And, by the way, if you look at the history of our country, it’s almost always been asked. So we’re looking — we’re fighting very hard against a system that’s a very difficult system. But we’ll make a decision. The Attorney General is working on that right now.

Q What’s the reason, Mr. President, for trying to get a citizenship question on the census?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, you need it for many reasons. Number one, you need it for —

Q (Inaudible) reason?

THE PRESIDENT: — Congress. You need it for Congress, for districting. You need it for appropriations. Where are the funds going? How many people are there? Are they citizens? Are they not citizens? You need it for many reasons.

Q Mr. President, what’s next for Ivanka Trump after the G20?

THE PRESIDENT: What?

Q What’s next for Ivanka Trump after the G20?

THE PRESIDENT: I thought Ivanka was amazing at the G20. And I’ll tell you, the foreign leaders loved her, and they just think she’s great. She’s very smart, and she’s done a great job. She sacrificed a lot. Ivanka and Jared work very hard, and they sacrificed a lot to be doing this, but they want to do it.

Ivanka has worked on almost 10 million jobs — training, and going to companies, and getting them to hire people.

But the people — the foreign leaders — really like her a lot.

Q Are you grooming her for office?

THE PRESIDENT: I’m not grooming her for office. No.

Q On the conditions at the border — as a parent, doesn’t that make you want to do something about it?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, as you know, President Obama had separation. President Obama, in 2014, built the cells that you always show on television. They were built — they were built by President Obama. But he had separation.

The one thing he didn’t have is a good economy, so he didn’t have the kind of onslaught that we’re having. We have a tremendous onslaught on people. Who can blame them? They want to get in; they want to take advantage of the economy.

But they have to come in — they have to come in legally and through merit. I think this: Border Patrol has done an incredible job and Mexico has been doing an incredible job.

Q Is Wilbur Ross’s job safe?

THE PRESIDENT: Yeah, it is. Wilbur is a good man. Look, a lot of people thought his answer was fine; I didn’t see the answer yet. They thought it was fine. It could be expanded, very simply. There are many reasons that you do it.

But, you know, we were surprised by that decision. Citizenship has been on that thing most of the time for many, many years. So it’s very shocking that, after spending $15 billion, it’s not on.

Q Biden says you’re trying to pull out of NATO.

THE PRESIDENT: No, no. Tell Biden that NATO has taken total advantage of him and President Obama. They took it — we were paying for almost all of NATO. We’re protecting countries. Those countries have to protect themselves with us. They have to make a contribution.

In my first year, I raised over $100 billion from those countries. Biden didn’t know what the hell he was doing and neither did President Obama. NATO was taking advantage of — now they’re paying. They still owe us a lot of money. Biden doesn’t know about that. He just thinks, stupidly, we do.

NATO is fine, but they have to pay their way. The United States is not going to get killed on trade with Europe. Europe kills us on trade, which we’re changing, and Europe then kills us because we defend Europe. And we lose a tremendous amount of money, but we lose on trade and the military.

President Obama and Vice President Biden, they didn’t have a clue. They got taken advantage of by China, by NATO, by every country they did business with.

Q Mr. President, are you watching the World Cup Final on Sunday?

THE PRESIDENT: I don’t know that I’ll be able.

Q Do you have a message for Team USA?

THE PRESIDENT: No, I’m — I hope they do well. I hope they win.

Q Mr. President, Obama never said that he wanted to meet with Kim Jong Un. Why did you say that? Why did you say he was begging for a meeting?

THE PRESIDENT: He called Kim Jong Un on numerous occasions to meet. President Obama wanted to meet with Kim Jong Un. And Kim Jong Un said no. Numerous occasions he called. And right now, we have a very nice relationship. We’ve done a lot. And we’ve gotten — we’ve gotten our hostages back. We’re getting the remains back. A lot of good things are happening. And there’s been no nuclear testing.

During President Obama, they were nuclear testing. They were sending missiles. Right now, everything is nice and quiet.

Thank you.

Transcript END 11:04 A.M.