Category World Economic Form

May 27 2020

Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 5)


Where might America be today had these studies been taken seriously by the government doctors?

Lee Cary image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—May 26, 2020

Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 5)
Review of Part 4 Takeaways
  • The notion that Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) could be a safe, inexpensive, readily-available, and effective drug to mitigate the effect of SARS-CoV-1 provoked efforts to discredit and silence those who supported that hypothesis.
  • As the debate between HCQ and Remdesivir progressed, the potential benefits of HCQ were supported by credible scientists and medical organizations, forcing the NIH to test HCQ.
  • When Trump announced he’d been taking a regime of HCQ, it enhanced the tempo and temperature of the debate.
  • The likely end of Remdesivir considered as an effective treatment of patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 opened the way for a replacement drug to emerge from another lab.
  • The Lancet, a nearly 200-year old British medical journal, stated that no antiviral drug has yet been proven effective for patients with severe SARS-CoV-2.

Those pushing Remdesivir, until its wheels came off, either ignored or downplayed scholarly studies favorable to HCQ. And, in some cases, ridiculed those who took them seriously.

When pro-HCQ videos posted on YouTube, the site’s Though Police deleted them and substituted the ominous dark screen above.

Destroying HCQ advocates

Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 5)
Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 4)
Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 3)
Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 2)
Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 1)

The pushback began with Dr. Judy Mikovits.  Note how Wikipedia profiles her (bolding added):

“Judy Anne Mikovits (born 1957 or 1958) is a former American research scientist who is known for her discredited medical claims, such as that murine endogenous retroviruses are linked to chronic fatigue syndrome. She has been described as an anti-vaccination activist and a promoter of conspiracy theories, and has been accused of scientific misconduct. She has made several false claims about vaccines, COVID-19, and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS)…In 2020, Mikovits promoted conspiracy theories about the COVID-19 pandemic via the internet video Plandemic, which made claims that are either false, or not based on scientific evidence.”

No bias there.

Her video (26 min) was nearing four million views on YouTube when the site’s Thought Police pulled it and replaced it with the screen above. You weren’t allowed to watch it. BTW, Mikovits is not a fan of the Wizard of SARS, Dr. Tony Fauci.

Now Mikovits has a shorter (10-min) video on YouTube. It’s not at the shutdown level, yet. Nor is it as thorough as the initial version.

After Mikovits came Professor Dolores Cahill, an even more formidable contrarian to the approved federal medical meme.  Cahill’s a full professor at University College, Dublin, Ireland, in the College of Medicine.  According to her bio on the university site, she is “a world-wide renowned expert in high-throughput proteomics technology development and automation, high content protein arrays and their biomedical applications, including in biomarker discovery and diagnostics.”

Here is a sample of her achievements:

Professor Dolores Cahill

  • “Prof. Cahill pioneered this research area at the Max-Planck-Institute of Molecular Genetics in Berlin, Germany, and holds several international patents in this field with research, biomedicine and diagnostic applications.
  • Over 20 years expertise in high-throughput protein & antibody array, automation, proteomics technology development & biomedical applications in biomarker discovery, diagnostics & personalised medicine.
  • Since 2005 to present, Full Professor of Translational Science, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Academic, Researcher, Lecturer, Module Coordinator in Pathology Teaching, School of Medicine & Conway Institute o 15 years as Irish, EU & international expert & advisor including Seconded National Expert to European Commission.
  • Company Co-founder & Shareholder (1997-2019) of Protagen AG in Germany (https://protagen.com/). Protagen Protein Services (2012-2019) contract services to healthcare sector & pharmaceutical industry (https://protagenproteinservices.com/).
  • Since 2016, co-founding shareholder and Advisory Board member of Prof. Stephen Pennington’s UCD School of Medicine/Conway Institute spin-out company, Atturos Ltd. working to improve Prostate Cancer diagnosis.
  • Prof. Cahill has a total of over 5,940 Citations, H (Hirsh)-index of 35, i10-index of 48.”

Need more? Try here.

Google “Dolores Cahill” and the first item up is a BusinessInsider.com article. It notes that it took 7 days for Facebook and YouTube to pull her 67 min. video.

Sharyl Attkisson

The Thought Police had more trouble erasing former CBS reporter Sharyl Attkisson’s video at Full Measure News. She examines the potential benefits of HCQ and suggests financial interests of its detractors may be in play. (She may have left CBS News because Ms. Attkisson is a real, live, actual investigative reporter.) 

YouTube pulled her 10 min. video, but then under pressure, reinstated it here. (Watch it while you can.) 

In a turnabout on May 21, legalinsurrection.com posted an article entitled “YouTube Reinstates Video in Which Doctors Say Hydroxychloroquine Treats COVID-19.” Soon thereafter, Attkisson was granted an interview with Trump.

Next came a legacy of the liberal print media—New York Times paper & magazine – that focused on other HCQ targets.

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko

April 2: “Touting Virus Cure, ‘Simple Country Doctor’ Becomes a Right-Wing Star, How Dr. Vladimir Zelenko’s claims for his coronavirus treatment spread from a New York village all the way to President Trump”

“Last month, residents of Kiryas Joel, a New York village of 35,000 Hasidic Jews, roughly an hour’s drive from Manhattan, began hearing about a promising treatment for the coronavirus that had been rippling through their community. The source was Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, 46, a mild-mannered family doctor with offices near the village. Since early March, his clinics had treated people with coronavirus-like symptoms, and he had developed an experimental treatment consisting of an antimalarial medication called hydroxychloroquine, the antibiotic azithromycin and zinc sulfate.”

“After testing this three-drug cocktail on hundreds of patients, some of whom had only mild or moderate symptoms when they arrived, Dr. Zelenko claimed that 100 percent of them had survived the virus with no hospitalizations and no need for a ventilator. ‘I’m seeing tremendous positive results,’ he said in a March 21 video, which was addressed to President Trump and eventually posted to YouTube and Facebook.”

[Note poetic polemic from the Times]“What happened next is a modern pandemic parable that illustrates how the coronavirus is colliding with our fragile information ecosystem: a jumble of facts, falsehoods and viral rumors patched together from Twitter threads and shards of online news, amplified by armchair experts and professional partisans and pumped through the warp-speed accelerator of social media.”

In other words, Zelenko is not someone to be taken seriously by the intelligent people who read the Times.

May 12: “He Was a Science Star. Then He Promoted a Questionable Cure for Covid-19. The man behind Trump’s favorite unproven treatment has made a great career assailing orthodoxy. His claim of a 100 percent cure rate shocked scientists around the world.”

Didier Raoult

The article about Didier Raoult in the NYT Magazine began:

“When diagnosing the ills afflicting modern science, an entertainment that, along with the disparagement of his critics and fellow researchers, he counts among his great delights, the eminent French microbiologist Didier Raoult will lightly stroke his beard, lean back in his seat and, with a thin but unmistakable smile, declare the poor patient to be stricken with pride. Raoult, who has achieved international fame since his proposed treatment for Covid-19 was touted as a miracle cure by President Trump, believes that his colleagues fail to see that their ideas are the products of mere intellectual fashions—that they are hypnotized by methodology into believing that they understand what they do not and that they lack the discipline of mind that would permit them to comprehend their error. ‘Hubris,’ Raoult told me recently, at his institute in Marseille, ‘is the most common thing in the world.’” {snip}

“Raoult, who founded and directs the research hospital known as the Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire Méditerranée Infection, or IHU, has made a great career assailing orthodoxy, in both word and practice.”

The tone of the NYT: How dare this French doctor assault what is medical orthodoxy to us in New York, and, thereby, ruin his career!

May 21:  But then, suddenly, former Democrat candidate for the Presidency, Senator Amy Klobuchar, admitted that HCQ recently cured her husband of SARS-Cov-2.  The news likely shook the halls of the DNC.

May 23: “World-famous medical doctor Dr. Drew Pinsky appeared on Fox 11 Los Angeles to react to President Trump revealing he (Pinsky) is taking the malaria drug hydroxychloroquine to lessen the symptoms of coronavirus.” The FOX News local reporter interviewing Pinsky was flabbergasted with what he was hearing.

It’s not as though there has been no scholarly research by competent scientists to examine the efficaciousness of HCQ. There has been—since January 28. Here’s a long biographical review of findings from then until April 13.

The overview of them all states:

“In general, completed clinical studies have yielded promising results regarding the safety and effectiveness of Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine in the TREATMENT of COVID-19…Within the context of an expanding COVID-19 pandemic, it is reasonable to propose the EARLY use of Hydroxychloroquine in attempt to reduce the number of COVID patient hospitalization days, and hence provide an increased rate of patient turnover and a more efficient use of limited hospital ventilators.” (caps and underlining in original)

Then, the final opinion:

“Historical controls are used in many previous studies in medicine. In this respect, the safety of Hydroxychloroquine is well documented. When the safe use of this drug is projected against its apparent effect of decreasing the progression of early cases to ventilator use, it is difficult to understand the reluctance of the authorities in charge of U.S. pandemic management to recommend its use in early COVID-19 cases. The effects of the chloroquines were first outlined 15 years ago by the CDC’s own Special Pathogens Unit.”

So,

Where might America be today had these studies been taken seriously by the government doctors?

And, who was responsible for seeing that they were not?

Breaking News: USA Today, quoted in the Chicago Sun Times, headline reads: “World Health Organization suspends use of hydroxychloroquine in study: ‘We want to use hydroxychloroquine if it is safe and efficacious, if it reduces mortality, reduces the length of hospitalization, without increasing the adverse events,” said Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, WHO’s chief scientist.’”

Next, Part 6: What began as laboratory science morphed into political science. Going forward: Beware of the coming of the “Trackers.”

 

May 27 2020

Demockracy: A More Sophisticated Tyranny


“Mr. Kenney, make Canada a democracy again.”

Mark Gray image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—May 26, 2020

Demockracy: A More Sophisticated Tyranny

Democracy:

  1. government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system.

Apparently, Canadians enjoy such a form of government. If so, that’s news to the 20 indigenous bands whose elected chiefs signed agreements to help build the Coastal GasLink pipeline.  The bands voted to choose their representatives. The Chiefs voted for a huge project that would provide opportunity, revenue, and good paying jobs to their communities. Business would flourish. Taxes would flow. Win-win-win. A perfect example of government by the people. Textbook democracy.

Demockracy:

  1. government over the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the government and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under an ideologically corrupt electoral system.

The Trudeau Liberals, however, pipeline and prosperity haters that they are, had a problem. How could they shut down the pipeline and not look like they were intentionally harming indigenous peoples who voted for it? They found the solution in the unelected Wet’suwet’en Hereditary “chiefs”, a few of whom objected to the project. The Liberals, with plenty of support from the media, chose the unelected chiefs to speak for the bands, essentially rendering the band member’s vote and the Chief’s decisions meaningless. Textbook demockracy.

“Experts” own your vote.

The Wet’suwet’en Hereditary chiefs did not usurp the band member’s votes themselves, they were simply a proxy for the real vote stealer, climate “experts” whose model predictions, like the COVID-19 predictions, have failed to materialize. Our big mistake is believing the models are meant to reflect reality. They aren’t, they are purposely designed to generate existential threats. The “experts” then say, “we’re all going to die unless we do something drastic”. The government, well, their hands are tied. Who are they to defy the “experts”? They don’t really want to implement policy that transfers wealth and freedom from the people to the rulers, they’re forced to in order to save lives.

It’s a beautiful scam that allows government to assume absolute power while delegating responsibility to the “experts” whose opinion now matters more than our votes. It is a much more elegant path to power than gulags or firing squads. Demockracy is a sophisticated form of oppression. A kinder, gentler tyranny.

Political ideology is irrelevant. Both progressive and conservative governments bowed to the “expert’s” demands to shut down our economies and lockdown the people. None questioned the accuracy of the models. None dared defy the new overlords, the “expert” class who keep getting everything wrong but still keep their exalted status. How does that work?

The media choose the “experts”

Think about it. What expert comes to mind when you think about climate change? The IPCC? Greta? The WWF, perhaps? How is it that a trace gas that comprises a mere .04% of the atmosphere, a substance we exhale with each breath, a component necessary for life on earth, can become a toxic climate killer with a greater climatic impact than the sun? Was there a debate? No. The media decided there was a crisis and they determine who is and isn’t a climate expert. If you agree with the consensus you are worthy, if you don’t, you’re a climate denier regardless of your PHD and 30 years working and teaching in the field.

The climate models predicted the end of polar ice and a burning planet. They were proven wrong years ago, and are still wrong, but the climate “experts” who agree, the all-powerful consensus, are still relied upon by our governments to shape climate policy. Consensus and science are mutually exclusive terms. A consensus has zero scientific value, none. However, it provides the “expert” opinion favoured by demockracies so it’s here to stay.

The COVID modellers are already proven wrong but their expertise is still shaping policy. The truth that COVID-19 is a bad flu that targets the elderly is coming out. Even the CDC admits it has a remarkably low death rate.

What would be really nice is if leaders like Ontario Premier Doug Ford and Kenney looked at the new CDC numbers and asked themselves, hey, what are we doing here? It’s ludicrous to close schools, playgrounds, and parks. It’s unnecessary to shut down business. Social distancing and masks are pointless. We are ending COVID policing, a policy doing grave damage to the relationship between society and authority, and we are opening up immediately.

It would be even better if they asked the media why news feeds remain filled with concerns about society re-opening, fears about a second wave, worry about people violating social distancing, the need for testing, vaccines, and contact tracing? Why don’t they throw the declining death rate in the media’s face and ask why they insist Canadians suffer further harm?

Our leader’s inability or unwillingness to step up is disconcerting. Their continued reliance on “experts” who are nothing of the sort and their whimpering acquiescence to a media who divorced the truth long ago is pushing people to the brink.

Taking Freedom Back

We the people are beginning to understand that if we want to live in freedom, we’ll have to step outside our comfort zone and demand it. The growing protests are a start, but they won’t change the flawed infrastructure of our demockracy.

Fledging groups like “Unify The People” are forming with the goal of declaring provincial independence and sovereignty. They are regular people tired of demockratic tyranny. The battle is on.

Calgarian Donna Ferolie has filed suit against the Federal government claiming that Frederick Haultain never signed Alberta into Confederation. Jason Kenney says he wants a fair deal and if Donna is right, he has all the leverage he needs to create a new, fair Canadian Confederation that respects the rights and freedoms of the people. Mr. Kenney, make Canada a democracy again.

May 27 2020

Is Gates Stupid or Very Clever with Vaccines?


Armstrong Economics Blog/Climate

Re-Posted May 27, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

QUESTION: Dear Mr Armstrong
I was in a discussion with a friend about current affairs – me, against Bill Gates and the likes and him, taking a more neutral stance. He asked if I watched some or anything he actually said. I said yes, well at least what you have posted I have watched in its entirety. I remember when you wrote about how to consider the position of the other side, even (or especially) when one it is opposed as to being the perceived enemy, be it Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump or Kim Jong Un. Now for me it Bill Gates these days. So my friend challenged me when he said that Bill’s view is that „a certain health standard (e.g. Through vaccination) would help less developed countries having to rely on large families for existential (= security) reason, therefore it would solve overpopulation…”. That certainly is way that I could not really argue against, was I to remember my Polish grandmother and siblings and how they had to essentially survive those days making their number count and work hard today to even make ends meet the next.

So I looked into this, what Bill Gates said about this (and luckily found a short video) where says precisely what I got to hear from my friend:
What is your view about this – would a certain level (albeit not reached via the almighty Socialism) of health and wealth globally make an end to the debate of overpopulation (which I anyway think is absurd for that matter, basing on that book by Malthus) and would that actually constitute a viable/true „thing” Bill Gates is pursuing (Here he comes, the savior of the poor and overpopulating)?

I am just trying to figure out how would I behave in such a position….
Thank you for all your work that driven NOT by profit and personal gain!

JL

ANSWER: Either Bill Gates is amazingly ignorant, or he is engaging in sophistry to sell his population-climate change agenda. The mistake people are making here is they are judging the third world on our own. What he is saying is that vaccinating everyone will mean they have a healthier child so they will need fewer children, which is absolutely a joke. The population naturally declines ONLY with economic advancement.

This has been the case from ancient times when the Roman Emperor Augustus (27 BC-14 AD) passed family laws to force men to marry because the Latin population was declining. The birth rates have declined substantially in Japan, Europe, and America with the rise in the economy. Russia was paying $9,000 for women to have children because the population declines only with economic advancement.

The reason is very simple. In an agrarian society, you have more children for they are your retirement and they take care of you in your old age and allow the farm to keep producing. You would typically have several children because also the mortality rate was high. The man was typically twice the age of his bride before 1800 because he had to FIRST prove himself by getting the farm, chickens, and house to show he could afford a family.

The age difference declined with the industrial revolution to the point it was only 50% older by 1900, dropping to perhaps 10-15 years older by 1930. It was after the Great Depression with the introduction of socialism that the age difference fell to near zero because the boy no longer needed to prove himself – we just love each other became the justification.

Postwar (1945), the government was there, not just for social benefits, but the introduction of Social Security also relieved the children of the burden of having to take care of their parents — that became the government’s job. This changed the very structure of families in the United States as was the case in Europe.

Where Gates’ proposition falls apart is that these third world countries are still in the agrarian stage and they lack the economic development that reduces the population. They need the children to run the farm and they need them for retirement for they lack such pension schemes. Just look at what happened in China with the one-child rule. The boy left for the economic lure of the big city, leaving the parents alone without support. Back in 2013, China had to pass a law that the children must visittheir parents. Elderly couples began importing girls from Southeast Asia to take care of them and they would leave them the property.

Sorry, I cannot believe Gates is that stupid. I believe it is merely his excuse for the depopulation of the earth and his father was a member of Eugenics which believed in the superiority of the Nordic-Anglo-Saxon Race genetically and were actively seeking to reduce the population of darker skinned people where Gates has focuses – India & Africa.

There is absolutely no support whatsoever for his claim that vaccinating children will make them healthier so they will have less. Donate food if that is really the issue – but there is no profit in that.

Their economic conditions in the third world do not support that conclusion. If he was really serious about that, then help them become industrialized and provide free food. Or wait, let me see, that would impact his climate change.

May 27 2020

Thuringia in Germany Abandons Virus Restrictions


Armstrong Economics Blog/Disease

Posted May 27, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

The free state of Thuringia in Germany, which has 2.15 million inhabitants, has declared that it will abolish all national corona protection regulations as of June 6. This means that the previous rules on minimum social distances, wearing masks, and contact restrictions will no longer apply. The socialists in the SPD have criticized the planned relaxation of the corona requirements. The SPD thinks the people are stupid and just still need clarity. Meanwhile, Bavaria’s state government said it is “horrified that elementary protective measures should now be abandoned,” according to Florian Herrmann, who is the head of the Bavarian State Chancellery, according to the German Press Agency (dpa). The Greens have also come out against any relaxation.

We can see that it is the environmentalists and the Socialists banning together to try to keep society divided and the economy in a downward spiral to achieve their end goals — a New Green World Order where paper money is eliminated and taxes can then be imposed arbitrarily. They fail to understand that most revolutions take place over tax increases. They are insane with their objectives and we see the federal government claiming it is willing to only help environmentally directed companies.

RUMOR

We have reliable rumors behind the curtain coming from Europe that beginning in 2021, all foreign citizens will be required to undergo a pre-screening and registration process, which will be known as the European Travel Information and Authorization System (ETIAS) before entering European Schengen-zone countries. Not all EU members are part of this Schengen agreement – notably Britain, Scotland, and Ireland. While this system was on schedule before the coronavirus, what is being suggested is that this should now include a health certificate to prove you have been vaccinated to visit Europe by Bill Gates.

If there is one way to kill tourism in Europe, they seem to have discovered that perfect law. Instead of the old Berlin Wall, it will become the European Wall.

Imposing this type of health clearance on top of a pre-clearance to travel will most likely only accelerate the breakup of the EU as Southern Europe is thrown into an economic depression killing all tourism as other member states are already telling their people not to leave their home state for fear of the virus.

May 27 2020

Navarro Hints President Trump Likely to Lower Hammer on China…


Posted originally on The Conservative Tree House on May 26, 2020 by 

White House Trade and Manufacturing Advisor Peter Navarro has a good discussion with Martha MacCallum about the economy, White House economic policy and the focus in the aftermath of the COVID crisis to reemphasize an industrial resurgence in the U.S.

As Navarro outlines the focus of the administration policy is on Main Street and driving the main street economy that overwhelmingly benefits middle-class workers.

That said, when questioned about President Trump’s recent tone toward China, Navarro hints toward what many expect… President Trump is going to deliver a very deliberate, very strategic, very focused and very painful economic blow to Beijing.  WATCH:

May 26 2020

Seizing the Moment – Mandating New Green World Order Manipulating the Press


Armstrong Economics Blog/Press

Re-Posted May 26, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

The Gates Promotional PR Team is out in full force lobbying the press to now support the redesign of the economy to end Climate Change. The strategy behind Gates is to use the media to put pressure on the politicians who will do whatever they think the people want and the way to get that is to manipulate the press. This has been the behind-the-curtain objective. The Economist used its front cover to sell the Gates hidden agenda calling for a global effort to tackle climate change. Covid-19 creates a unique chance to steer the economy away from carbon.

They go on to say that low energy prices make it easier to cut subsidies and introduce a carbon tax. Oil and gas firms, steel producers, and carmakers are already going through the agony of shrinking. Getting economies back on their feet requires a climate-friendly investment that, thanks to low-interest rates, will be more affordable. The world should seize the moment.

This is the greatest propaganda scheme in history. I am very disappointed in the Economist for they are just mouthing the Gates Agenda. They offer no actual analysis of how such a to restructure would unfold and imposing taxes now in the middle of an economic depression is NO WAY to restore the economy. If anything, the Economist, without any real analysis whatsoever, is suggesting that the world economy will remain in an economic depression for 13 years minimum and that in the process they will NOT restore jobs but destroy more and unleash the dogs of war.

We are witnessing the takeover of the world by the Climate Change Activists backed with unlimited funds from what ABC News called – our SUPER RICH FRIENDS. Gates has successfully manipulated the press into creating a global lockdown with a minimal virus for the sole objective of shutting down fossil fuel use. It is amazing how blind the majority really are – just outright willfully ignorant of sacrificing their own future and employment. There has NEVER been any evidence put forth to prove that CO2 is even the sole factor as they maintain in creating Climate Change when they refuse to address any data before 1850.

May 26 2020

Coronavirus & the Socialist Revolution – Available Now


Armstrong Economics Blog/Products and Services

Re-Posted May 25, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

  

This report goes into the logistics about this Coronavirus Pandemic and moves into the dangers it presents economically as well as the crisis we face in famine. These people think that they can simply crash the economy and rebuilt it from scratch as if that is a simple task. They risk creating a major economic depression that we will not be able to escape for 13 years. At the very least, we are looking at a very strange set of circumstances that are coming together.

This report debunks the the claims of the virus and illustrates the end goal remains the same with the Climate Change agenda. We have published also the WHO report from 2019 which concluded that Social Distancing was ineffective. So why impose something they know did not work shutting down the world economy on a theory with no historical support? We have also included the differences between a epidemic and a pandemic including the inevitable second wave as with the Spanish flu they will use to try to influence the elections come November.

Nevertheless, they have indeed set in motion the danger of a Dark Age for this report goes into detail the historical Reoccurrence of the Sixth Wave when civilization collapses. We have published for the first time the 309.6 year Sixth Wave sequence back to 4154BC to get a sense how civilization has dealt with such events throughout time.

This report dives into the historical risk of famine which has also been put in motion by the lockdowns and it deals with the New Green World Order.

Special Report …………………  $14.95

May 26 2020

Dragon Move – Chairman Xi Imposing Mainland National Security Laws Upon Hong Kong…


Posted originally on The Conservative Tree House on May 25, 2020 by 

China is signaling they will drop the panda illusion and take a full frontal dragon approach toward Hong Kong. Chairman Xi Jinping is deploying, some say he has already deployed, the Ministry of State Security – China’s leading intelligence agency – into Hong Kong to begin formal control through national security laws.

The move appears to be a direct signal that communist Beijing will not longer accept or allow Hong Kong’s current autonomous status as a free democracy. Beijing signaling “enough is enough”, and Hong Kongers are rightly concerned.  If Xi follows through, we can expect to see even more protests and confrontations; and the possibility President Trump will remove the “special trade status” the U.S. gives to Hong Kong.

Right now Hong Kong is exempt from U.S. tariffs and other economic measures the U.S. has deployed against China.  If Beijing takes full control, that could quickly change.

(Reuters) – Beijing appears determined to stamp out any renewed rebellion against the Communist Party’s authority over the former British colony. China’s largely rubber-stamp parliament, the National People’s Congress, is preparing to circumvent the city’s lawmaking body, the Legislative Council, in drafting the new laws.

The fear among many in Hong Kong is that China intends to criminalize existing freedoms, including criticism of the central government and its policies. It is the latest and biggest step in a concerted effort by Beijing to assert control over Hong Kong and its 7.4 million people.

In recent weeks there had been widespread speculation here that Beijing was planning this move, described by some local commentators as the “nuclear option.” Thursday’s announcement by China nonetheless stunned pro-democracy lawmakers, business leaders and lawyers in the city. It was, they said, a historic turning point – the end of “one country, two systems,” the formula Beijing had promised would allow Hong Kong to retain its way of life and freedom for at least 50 years after the 1997 handover to Chinese rule.

“This represents a real demolition of the one country, two systems idea and also the idea of Hong Kong’s autonomy,” said barrister Wilson Leung, a member of the Progressive Lawyers Group. Leung said extremely harsh sentences had been imposed on dissidents, journalists and lawyers on the mainland under vaguely expressed but draconian laws. “These same vague concepts are now being introduced to Hong Kong,” he said.

Many details of the new laws and exactly how they will be absorbed into Hong Kong’s existing statutes remain unclear. But Beijing has openly expressed its intentions in recent months. It wants to end the cycle of mass protests that have thwarted successive post-colonial administrations each time they have moved to more closely align the city with China’s political and legal system.

[…] Hong Kong is a vital cog in China’s economy. While China still has extensive capital controls and often intervenes in its financial markets and banking system, Hong Kong is one of the most open economies in the world and one of the biggest markets for equity and debt financing.

China uses Hong Kong’s currency, equity and debt markets to attract foreign funds, while international companies use Hong Kong as a launchpad to expand into mainland China. The bulk of foreign direct investment in China continues to be channeled through the city. And many of China’s biggest firms have listed in Hong Kong, often as a springboard to global expansion.  (read more)

Prior to the Wuhan virus President Trump was positioning the confrontation between the U.S. and China based on economics and trade.  Within that dynamic Beijing had a weak hand and President Trump exploited their vulnerabilities with a geopolitical strategy to dismantle China’s one-belt/one-road expansion plan.

President Trump used access to the strong U.S. market to leverage multinational companies away from Chinese manufacturing.  Trump’s tariffs against China were extremely effective; and led to Beijing’s initial acquiescence.   However, it was soon evident that China would not accept their diminished economic outcome.

If Xi moves on Hong Kong, there’s a very strong likelihood President Trump will remove the HK special trade status which will have an immediate impact.

May 25 2020

Videos on Bill Gates and his Handmaiden Dr. Anthony Fauci and Their Plan to Reduce the Word’s Population that Google doesn’t want You to See!


Bill Gates was a ruthless businessman and used any means legal or not to achieve his goal. Ho he accomplished that is not the story here but the bottom line was after he retired he created a 501(c)(3)  Foundation, The Bill & Melisa Gates Foundation twenty years ago in 2000. The stated goal was the created an illusion that this foundation was created to help the poor and  destitute of the world, nothing could be further from the truth. The foundation started off with $46.8 billion  and Gates started giving large grants to implement his stated goals.

No one knows exactly how much money Gates gave away but it was, without doubt, tens of billions of dollars over the past 20 years. Gates made sure the world knew what he was doing through his extensive publicity efforts. However strangely the latest financial records of the foundation indicates that it’s assets are probably worth over $100 billion today. So it would seem that Gates was doing more than giving away grant money. So what was his real purpose of this foundation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initially his focus seemed to be on Climate change And how it was imperative that we stop using carbon based fuels that were creating Carbon Dioxide (CO2) and that was casuing the temperature of the planet to increase and that that increasing temperature would in the near future destroy civilization itself.  Gates was not lone in this believe as Al Gore the former President Clinton VP was also on board with this idea. I became aware of this is a famous TED talk where Gates indicated that that to get to zero emissions of Carbon Dioxide production my humans would have to go to zero. Later it became obvious that this college drop out was not educated as he was being influence by those that followed the dis bunked theory of Tomas Malthus found in his 1798 book An Essay on the Principle of Population, Which basically stated the the growth of the population would out strip the ability to feed it and that would create famine and war. 222 years later, today, we know that was not true.  But Gates apparently does think it is true and it seems that his REAL GOAL is to significantly reduce the worlds population.

The following bits of videos will show that Gate and Fauci (a hired hand of Gates) probably created this COVID-19 pandemic in Wuhan China and hid its release in China and the World Health organization until it had spread world wide. This two both need to be tried for Crimes Against Humanity. or example from a NIH 2005 study, that found that “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” Fauci has been rejecting the use of this and has been preaching the Gates vaccine solution. The report stated:

“We report, however, that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage. In addition to the well-known functions of chloroquine such as elevations of endosomal pH, the drug appears to interfere with terminal glycosylation of the cellular receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. This may negatively influence the virus-receptor binding and abrogate the infection, with further ramifications by the elevation of vesicular pH, resulting in the inhibition of infection and spread of SARS CoV at clinically admissible concentrations.

Conclusion

Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in cell culture. Favorable inhibition of virus spread was observed when the cells were either treated with chloroquine prior to or after SARS CoV infection. In addition, the indirect immunofluorescence assay described herein represents a simple and rapid method for screening SARS-CoV antiviral compounds.”

Error
This video doesn’t exist
May 24 2020

What is Bill Gates Up too with His Vaccines and Dominance in the Medical Issue if You are Curious then you Must Watch this Four Videos!


A dozen years ago, or there about, Bill Gates became worried about Climate Change and gave a TED talk on what the world had to do to save us from extinction. In that presentation Gates stated that one of the variable in his equation had to go to zero to stop Carbon Dioxide from killing all of us.  Now keep in mind that Gates does not have any degrees and knows little about anything but making money with software. We do however recognize that he was very good at that but we must also understand that he had no formal training or studies in anything else.

Gates’ vision is a world with less than a billion people and probably closer to 500 million. This world will be very clean and use only solar PV or Wind to power this Utopia. Everything will be perfect and safe for those that reside in that world. Dreams of that kind are neither practical nor doable but that never stops those that have these visions: like Karl Marx who also had a vision of a perfect world. Unfortunately that vision brought us WW I,  WW II and the cold war and hundreds of millions of dead people, and Marxism has still not been eliminate as an evil system.

Gates has merged Marxism, environmentalism, climate change and world health into one system using technology, which he is very good at, that makes George Orwell’s “1984” look like it was done by a rank amateur. If Gates even comes close we will be living in Hell!

The story of Bill gates from James Corbett

Part One

Part Two

Part Three

Part Four