Tag Archives: Anthony Fauci

May 26 2020

Coronavirus & the Socialist Revolution – Available Now


Armstrong Economics Blog/Products and Services

Re-Posted May 25, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

  

This report goes into the logistics about this Coronavirus Pandemic and moves into the dangers it presents economically as well as the crisis we face in famine. These people think that they can simply crash the economy and rebuilt it from scratch as if that is a simple task. They risk creating a major economic depression that we will not be able to escape for 13 years. At the very least, we are looking at a very strange set of circumstances that are coming together.

This report debunks the the claims of the virus and illustrates the end goal remains the same with the Climate Change agenda. We have published also the WHO report from 2019 which concluded that Social Distancing was ineffective. So why impose something they know did not work shutting down the world economy on a theory with no historical support? We have also included the differences between a epidemic and a pandemic including the inevitable second wave as with the Spanish flu they will use to try to influence the elections come November.

Nevertheless, they have indeed set in motion the danger of a Dark Age for this report goes into detail the historical Reoccurrence of the Sixth Wave when civilization collapses. We have published for the first time the 309.6 year Sixth Wave sequence back to 4154BC to get a sense how civilization has dealt with such events throughout time.

This report dives into the historical risk of famine which has also been put in motion by the lockdowns and it deals with the New Green World Order.

Special Report …………………  $14.95

May 25 2020

Videos on Bill Gates and his Handmaiden Dr. Anthony Fauci and Their Plan to Reduce the Word’s Population that Google doesn’t want You to See!


Bill Gates was a ruthless businessman and used any means legal or not to achieve his goal. Ho he accomplished that is not the story here but the bottom line was after he retired he created a 501(c)(3)  Foundation, The Bill & Melisa Gates Foundation twenty years ago in 2000. The stated goal was the created an illusion that this foundation was created to help the poor and  destitute of the world, nothing could be further from the truth. The foundation started off with $46.8 billion  and Gates started giving large grants to implement his stated goals.

No one knows exactly how much money Gates gave away but it was, without doubt, tens of billions of dollars over the past 20 years. Gates made sure the world knew what he was doing through his extensive publicity efforts. However strangely the latest financial records of the foundation indicates that it’s assets are probably worth over $100 billion today. So it would seem that Gates was doing more than giving away grant money. So what was his real purpose of this foundation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initially his focus seemed to be on Climate change And how it was imperative that we stop using carbon based fuels that were creating Carbon Dioxide (CO2) and that was casuing the temperature of the planet to increase and that that increasing temperature would in the near future destroy civilization itself.  Gates was not lone in this believe as Al Gore the former President Clinton VP was also on board with this idea. I became aware of this is a famous TED talk where Gates indicated that that to get to zero emissions of Carbon Dioxide production my humans would have to go to zero. Later it became obvious that this college drop out was not educated as he was being influence by those that followed the dis bunked theory of Tomas Malthus found in his 1798 book An Essay on the Principle of Population, Which basically stated the the growth of the population would out strip the ability to feed it and that would create famine and war. 222 years later, today, we know that was not true.  But Gates apparently does think it is true and it seems that his REAL GOAL is to significantly reduce the worlds population.

The following bits of videos will show that Gate and Fauci (a hired hand of Gates) probably created this COVID-19 pandemic in Wuhan China and hid its release in China and the World Health organization until it had spread world wide. This two both need to be tried for Crimes Against Humanity. or example from a NIH 2005 study, that found that “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” Fauci has been rejecting the use of this and has been preaching the Gates vaccine solution. The report stated:

“We report, however, that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage. In addition to the well-known functions of chloroquine such as elevations of endosomal pH, the drug appears to interfere with terminal glycosylation of the cellular receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. This may negatively influence the virus-receptor binding and abrogate the infection, with further ramifications by the elevation of vesicular pH, resulting in the inhibition of infection and spread of SARS CoV at clinically admissible concentrations.

Conclusion

Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in cell culture. Favorable inhibition of virus spread was observed when the cells were either treated with chloroquine prior to or after SARS CoV infection. In addition, the indirect immunofluorescence assay described herein represents a simple and rapid method for screening SARS-CoV antiviral compounds.”

Error
This video doesn’t exist
May 25 2020

Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 3)


The Centers for Disease Control admits incorrect numbers

Lee Cary image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—May 24, 2020

Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both?

Review of Part 2 Takeaways

  • The official first case of a U.S. SARS-CoV-2 patient treated with Remdesivir reveals big, federal government, health organizations were ill-prepared for a pandemic.
  • Those organizations were aware of a virus brewing in China, but underestimated its potential impact on America.
  • While government scientists in the U.S. were getting organized, labs in China were aggressively competing to mass produce Remdesivir.
  • Before SARS-CoV-2 metastasized in the U.S., the Wizard of SARS, Dr. Tony Fauci, was publicly downplaying its potential impact on the nation.

The Centers for Disease Control admits incorrect numbers

CDC Director Robert R. Redfield (pictured above) has admitted that his agency had over-stated the SARS-CoV-2 mortality rate compared to the 1957-1958 flu pandemic. The agency reported that, “[T]he mortality ratio for the COVID-19 virus is similar to the mortality rate of 1957-1958 flu pandemic.” That 50’s pandemic caused 1-2 million deaths worldwide, and 77,000-116,000 in the U.S.  Nevertheless, it did not lead to a shutdown of the U.S. economy with the loss of millions of jobs.

Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 3)
Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 2)
Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 1)

In 1957, the U.S. population was 177 million – about one-half of the current count.  Today, SARS-CoV-2 has killed over 97,000 Americans – heavily targeting senior citizens, many with co-morbidities. Meanwhile, the CDC estimatesthat this year’s seasonal flu left 24,000-62,000 Americans dead.

Recall that, back in early May, it was reported that Dr. Deborah Brix, the White House Coronavirus Task Forceresponse administrator, stated in a meeting of that group, “There is nothing from the CDC that I can trust”.  (Did anyone in the media ask what she meant by that?)

The tendency to over-estimate SARS-CoV-2 numbers began with the Imperial College epidemiologist and advisor to the British Government, Neil Ferguson.  TIME noted that:

“On March 16, Ferguson and colleagues published a paper suggesting that even with some social distancing measures, the U.K. could see 250,000 coronavirus deaths and that the U.S. might have about 1 million deaths. In a worst-case scenario, Ferguson predicted those figures could more than double in both countries.”

Ferguson resigned as an advisor to the British Government when it was revealed he’d received romantic, secret home visits from his paramour, thereby breaking social-distancing rules during the pandemic.

NEJM likely knocks out Remdesivir as a SARS-CoV-2 drug

The bad news for Gilead Sciences’ proposed virus drug, Remdesivir, broke on May 23 in a Zerohedge.com articleentitled “The Remdesivir Study Is Finally Out: Drug Only Helped Those On Oxygen, Finds Mortality Too High For Standalone Treatment”. That announcement read in part:

“According to a pivotal study published in the New England Journal of Medicine late on Friday, Remdesivir (May 23), which was authorized to treat Covid-19 in a group of 1063 adults and children (split into two groups, one receiving placebo instead of remdesivir) who need i.) supplemental oxygen, ii) a ventilator or iii) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), only significantly helped those on supplemental oxygen.”

“Meanwhile, and explaining the 6pm release on a Friday, the study also found no marked benefit from remdesivir for those who were healthier and didn’t need oxygen or those who were sicker, requiring a ventilator or a heart-lung bypass machine.” {snip}

“Whereas there was a modest benefit only to patients who were receiving oxygen, the results were statistically insignificant vs placebo for patients not receiving oxygen, while in a surprising twist patient on high-flow oxygen or mechanical ventilator/ECMO did modestly better in the placebo group than those taking remdesivir.” {snip}

“In conclusion, while the “preliminary findings support the use of remdesivir for patients who are hospitalized with Covid-19 and require supplemental oxygen therapy” the study goes on to warn that “given high mortality despite the use of remdesivir, it is clear that treatment with an antiviral drug alone is not likely to be sufficient.” (most highlighting in original article)

This critical judgment on the efficaciousness of Remdesivir came as no surprise. Beginning on April 23, the evidence mounted based on a study of the drug in China reviewed in multiple posts:

bbc.com: “There had been widespread hope that remdesivir could treat Covid-19. But a Chinese trial showed that the drug had not been successful, according to draft documents accidentally published by the World Health Organization. The drug did not improve patients’ condition or reduce the pathogen’s presence in the bloodstream, it said.” (April 23)

statnews.com: “The antiviral medicine remdesivir from Gilead Sciences failed to speed the improvement of patients with Covid-19 or prevent them from dying, according to results from a long-awaited clinical trial conducted in China. Gilead, however, said the data suggest a ‘potential benefit.’ A summary of the study results was inadvertently posted to the website of the World Health Organization and seen by STAT on Thursday, but then removed. A draft manuscript was provided by the authors to WHO and inadvertently posted on the website and taken down as soon as the mistake was noticed.” (April 23)

biospace.com: “According to a report in the Financial Times, the data from the study showed remdesivir did not improve patients’ condition or reduce the pathogen’s presence in the bloodstream. There were also concerns about some potential side effects caused by the drug. The study suggests more patients died on remdesivir than those on placebo, 13.9% compared to 12.8%, respectively.” (April 23)

web.md.com: “Disappointing results emerged from the first gold-standard clinical trial for remdesivir, which found that the drug did not help patients in China with severe COVID-19. Those findings were published April 29 in The Lancet medical journal.” {snip}

“‘Unfortunately, our trial found that while safe and adequately tolerated, remdesivir did not provide significant benefits over placebo’, says Professor Bin Cao from China-Japan Friendship Hospital and Capital Medical University in China, who led the research. ‘This is not the outcome we hoped for, but we are mindful that we were only able to enroll 237 of the target 453 patients because the COVID-19 outbreak was brought under control in Wuhan. What’s more, restrictions on bed availability resulted in most patients being enrolled later in the disease course, so we were unable to adequately assess whether earlier treatment with remdesivir might have provided clinical benefit.’” (April 29)

The NEJM may have dropped the final straw that broke the Remdesivir back.

Next in Part 4: The apparent demise of Remdesivir takes it out of competition with Hydroxychloroquine. But another drug company competitor is already in play. Plus, the topic of censorship from YouTube merits more space than what remains in this installment of “Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both?” It, too, is ahead.    

[A personal note from the author:  This article may post on or near May 25, Memorial Day in the United States, when I will again remember a sophomore band member who sat next to me in a Chicago suburban high school band when I was a senior. He was a small, Hispanic kid with an easy smile and a quiet demeanor. I graduated and went to college, never to see him again. Two years later he graduated, joined the United States Marine Corps, and went to Vietnam. He came home in a flag-draped coffin. I salute him every Memorial Day—when no one is looking – and will do so, until I am no long able.]

Hydroxychloroquine | Full Measure

If you’ve watched the news lately, you might be under the impression that a medicine President Trump touted as a possible game changer against coronavirus— has been debunked and discredited. Two divergent views of the drug, hydroxychloroquine, have emerged: the negative one widely reported in the press and another side you’ve probably heard less about. Never has a discussion about choices of medicine been so laced with political overtones. Today, how politics, money and medicine intersect with coronavirus.

May 25 2020

‘Non-Partisan’ Fading Hollywood Stars Gang Up With “Non-Partisan” Democrats For Election 2020


Non-profit, Non-Partisan—and now available with a New Lemon Scent

Judi McLeod image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—May 24, 2020

'Non-Partisan' Fading Hollywood Stars Gang Up With Non-Partisan Democrats For Election 2020

There’s a killer of a story out there virtually ignored by 90 percent of mainstream and social media—and it’s not just that Julia Roberts and other celebs are teaming up with Dr. Anthony Fauci and health experts to promote a global response to the Chinese Coronavirus.

The bigger story not in the news is that in their latest efforts to hijack the masses, Hollywood, Democrats and media have managed to hide their partisan activism under boldly stated deceitful claims of being: “non-partisan”, “non-profit”.

That’s how the One Campaign defines “non-profit”?

How can #PassTheMic, an initiative organized by global “non-profit” ONE Campaign aimed at promoting “health and economic experts … discussing a global response to” the Chinese coronavirus pandemic possibly describe itself as “non-partisan”?

“The #PassTheMic campaign, announced Wednesday, is part of the ONE World Campaign and calls “for a global response to COVID-19 that protects the most vulnerable, supports people worst hit economically, strengthens health systems and creates a more just and equal world.” (Breitbart, May 21, 2020)

#PassTheMic is organized by the One Campaign, an NGO founded by perpetual tosspot singer Bono and funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Though it sets itself the lofty goals of ending poverty, inequality, discrimination and disease, the One Campaign was slated in 2010 for donating only 1.2 percent of its funds to charity, and a whopping 53 percent to salaries. Furthermore, despite its focus on alleviating African poverty, the One Campaign was found in 2018 to have dodged tax in South Africa, and the organization’s higher-ups were accused of abusing employees there for half a decade. (RT, May 22, 2020 )

“In response to the salary controversy, the One Campaign described itself as an advocacy organization and not a charity. During the coronavirus outbreak, this advocacy has continued unabated. Its #PassTheMic videos and posts link to a page urging readers to demand an international response to the disease.”

That’s how the One Campaign defines “non-profit”?

How non-partisan is that?!

Melinda Gates, co-founder of the Gates Foundation with her husband Bill Gates, has slammed the Trump administration for creating ‘chaos’ and showing a lack of leadership in the Coronavirus response.

How non-partisan is that?!

Even though Roberts and other stars are giving over their social media accounts to ‘experts’  due to run throughout May and June, they’re really only the bit players in this latest star-power activism.

“Roberts will be the first to relinquish her social media accounts — Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter — to Dr. Fauci. (Breitbart)

“Hollywood stars Hugh Jackman, Sarah Jessica Parker, David Oyelowo, Busy Philipps, Rita Wilson, Robin Wright, Connie Britton, Millie Bobby Brown, Danai Gurira, and others are giving health experts their social media accounts for 24-hours to various health experts. A video has been released to announce the campaign.

The part on the video that describes ‘#PassTheMic, the initiative organized by global nonprofit ONE Campaign’ should read: “Non-profit, Non-Partisan—and now available with a New Lemon Scent”!

How “non-partisan” can a gang-up of Hollywood with the Dems possibly be?

With no media rating the partisanship of these activists, Fauci has already become a household name:

“Dr. Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and a member of President Donald Trump’s White House task force, has become a household name, from joining late-night TV shows to celebrity podcast programs to promote the administration’s message about its response to how people should best take care of their health in response to the Chinese coronavirus. (Breitbart)

“Dr. Fauci even once said he’d like to be played by Brad Pitt in any future movie portrayal of the coronavirus crisis. Saturday Night Live was happy to oblige with Pitt, who played Dr. Fauci in a skit last month.”

How this helped tame the coronavirus crisis is anybody’s guess.

“Just the same, Dr. Fauci has often publicly contradicted the president, for instance on when and how quickly to reopen schools and America’s economy.” (Breitbart)

Nor is the ‘#PassTheMic/ONE Campaign the only group out there masquerading as “non-partisan”

How non-partisan is that?

“The launch of the campaign comes on the heels of President Trump’s message to the World Health Organization, warning that it will permanently lose U.S. funding unless it commits to “major substantive improvements within the next 30 days.” (Breitbart)

“Trump suspended U.S. funding to the United Nations subsidiary last month, as Breitbart News reported, noting then the W.H.O. played a key role in “mismanaging and covering up” the global spread of the deadly Chinese coronavirus.”

Nor is the ‘#PassTheMic/ONE Campaign the only group out there masquerading as “non-partisan”.

Incredibly, Michelle Obama’s ‘When We All Vote’ initiative advocating for a mail-in vote with co-chair Tom Hanks is also publicly claiming  falsely claiming “non-partisan” status.

Anyone who believes that the former First Lady is “non-partisan” would believe that her husband former president and now ‘Resistance’ Leader Barack Obama is “non-partisan”.

Meanwhile, the political antics of these activists has led to a shut-down of the entire Western World, and while millions are losing their jobs and can no longer feed their children, they are out there masquerading as non-partisans and playing charades.

Related: The Return of the Obamas—Who Never Went Away—To Steal Election 2020

Celebrities #PasstheMic to Experts on COVID-19 | ONE World

May 25 2020

Memorial Day 2020: Have those who Fought for Freedom, Died in Vain?


Yet, what of today? Are Americans not in a civil war? Are Socialists not testing whether this nation, “conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal…” will continue to endure?

Dennis Jamison image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—May 24, 2020

Memorial Day 2020: Have those who Fought for Freedom, Died in Vain?

In recent years, Memorial Day in the United States was just another holiday for American citizens to enjoy fun things people did over the three-day holiday weekend, which also marked the unofficial commencement of summertime. It was not considered too seriously across the social spectrum. This year is different. This year citizens are coping with the COVID-19 Pandemic, the various reactions to the virus and repercussions, and realities in states where Big Brother is cracking down on conservatives, and patriots, and people of faith, for the sake of “public health and safety.”

Memorial Day was born from the ashes and loss from the American Civil War

Indeed, Memorial Day this year may be taken much more seriously across the nation—possibly as serious as it was long, long ago. Memorial Day is actually a day to honor the dead. Yet, like the topic of death itself, Memorial Day tends to conjure up issues people would rather not discuss. It used to be easier to throw a party, a barbeque, or take an early mini-vacation as a way of celebrating a three-day holiday with family and friends. Thinking about the deeper meaning of Memorial Day was difficult. If taken seriously, as in days long past, it was a day to honor those who offered their lives for the sake of a higher cause.

If taken in a serious way, the original purpose of Memorial Day was meant to grapple with the painful experience of the nation’s massive loss of life. Memorial Day was born from the ashes and loss from the American Civil War. Sadly, over 620,000 men and boys died in the Civil War. The incredibly painful reality of the loss of so many men and boys prompted the Veteran’s Association to implement “Decoration Day,” to honor all Union soldiers “who… gave their lives that the nation might live…” It was a practical means for families and survivors to officially mourn and honor lost family and loved ones.

Today, in the midst of the COVID-19 assault upon the world, the U.S. death toll is close to 100,000 American lives. The statistics do not do justice to the loss of a loved one’s life in such a time. The sobering circumstances should give people of conscience a genuine reason to pause and consider the value of life itself. This is what happened in the wake of the Civil War. Today, in the midst of COVID-19, men and women who truly recognize the value of life should take the time to pause and consider the value of life itself. Yet, in deepest sincerity, it is also a time to recognize the difference between those who gave their lives willingly to those who died as victims of disease.

From the moment of the “shot heard ’round the world” to the “War on Terrorism,” American patriots have been willing to take up arms to fight for freedom

Ultimately, Memorial Day continues to represent a day to remember and to honor the sacrifice of those who gave their lives in service to their country. The day was meant to be a day of remembrance to deal with the void from such a massive loss of human lives. Yet, years beyond America’s potential self destruction, citizens were willing to give their lives for the sake of other people’s freedom even on distant battlefields on foreign soil.  In fact, from the moment of the “shot heard ’round the world” to the “War on Terrorism,” American patriots have been willing to take up arms to fight for freedom.

In their own day, brave and brilliant men gave their lives that this nation might be born. In their own day, Union soldiers sacrificed their lives so the nation could survive. Through much of American history, brave and brilliant men and women, in their own day, could heed the call to defend and protect Freedom. However in recent years, since the U.S. involvement in Vietnam, Americans have been confused with mixed meanings of freedom. Others have sought to define freedom for us, and citizens have doubted our bedrock values. From the days of the Vietnam War and the assassination of John F. Kennedy, Americans have drifted once again into serious division.
Today, America is obviously divided. And as Abraham Lincoln said, in quoting Jesus,  “A house divided against itself cannot stand.” It is true. Yet, it is also quite true that America resolved one of its deepest contradictions: slavery. Abraham Lincoln knew that the problem of slavery had to be rectified, but it came at great cost. And, his impassioned veneration of the Union patriots in his Gettysburg Address has reverberated through the ages. Yet now, his true sentiments need to be taken up once again, as citizens need to remember why Memorial Day is important:

Are Americans not in a civil war?

We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that the nation might live…

But in a larger sense, we cannot dedicate – we cannot consecrate — we cannot hallow this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract…  It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us – that from these honored dead we take increased devotion – that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain –  that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom…

Yet, what of today? Are Americans not in a civil war? Are Socialists not testing whether this nation, “conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal…” will continue to endure? Will Americans take up the unfinished work, so nobly advanced in years past? Is it not for us, living in this time, to be dedicated to the great task remaining before us – that from all of America’s honored dead, we take increased devotion – to resolve that those who gave their lives shall not have died in vain? Did they die only to see this generation allow freedom to die? Will this nation, under God, have a new birth of freedom? Or, will evil triumph because good men and women could not sense the value of sacrificing one’s self for the sake of the future?

May 25 2020

US Crowds Defy Lockdowns


Armstrong Economics Blog/Disease

Re-Posted May 25, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

Americans are defying the lockdown orders throughout the country from California to the Atlantic Seaboard. People have discarded their masks which the CDC originally stated will not prevent getting a virus of any kind. Politicians are going to find that at least 33% of the population is thumbing their noses at government and see this nonsense for what it truly is – hype by the left-wing media supporting Bill Gates and his entire agenda.

The same thing is taking place in the Netherlands. People are fed upon with this deranged attempt to suppress the people into a political fascist state of total control that has even been used in true Marxist fashion to shut down the freedom of Religion.

In the USA, Trump has come out in support of all religions and the NPR Survey shows that white Evangelicals view Trump as ‘Honest’ And ‘Morally Upstanding’ while many others see him as fighting for their religious rights against the corruption of the Democratic Party. Trump urged CDC to reopen churches saying religious institutions are “essential” to the nation’s recovery. He also criticized Democratic governors for deliberately stalling efforts to get back to work and worship.

This will be an interesting election. The Democrats have certainly tried to use this virus as the main point against Trump. What they have have ignited is a backlash against their own party.

May 24 2020

What is Bill Gates Up too with His Vaccines and Dominance in the Medical Issue if You are Curious then you Must Watch this Four Videos!


A dozen years ago, or there about, Bill Gates became worried about Climate Change and gave a TED talk on what the world had to do to save us from extinction. In that presentation Gates stated that one of the variable in his equation had to go to zero to stop Carbon Dioxide from killing all of us.  Now keep in mind that Gates does not have any degrees and knows little about anything but making money with software. We do however recognize that he was very good at that but we must also understand that he had no formal training or studies in anything else.

Gates’ vision is a world with less than a billion people and probably closer to 500 million. This world will be very clean and use only solar PV or Wind to power this Utopia. Everything will be perfect and safe for those that reside in that world. Dreams of that kind are neither practical nor doable but that never stops those that have these visions: like Karl Marx who also had a vision of a perfect world. Unfortunately that vision brought us WW I,  WW II and the cold war and hundreds of millions of dead people, and Marxism has still not been eliminate as an evil system.

Gates has merged Marxism, environmentalism, climate change and world health into one system using technology, which he is very good at, that makes George Orwell’s “1984” look like it was done by a rank amateur. If Gates even comes close we will be living in Hell!

The story of Bill gates from James Corbett

Part One

Part Two

Part Three

Part Four

 

May 24 2020

This Post Contains U Tube Videos on Bill Gates and his COVID virus that have been banned and/or taken down


We are at a crossroads between two visions for our country: path one, we follow those that want to keep us quarantined and the other path is the one where retrain the Republic and freedom. Path One is never good and Path Two is always good!

Path One is being orchestrated by Bill Gates though The Bill and Melisa Gates Foundation.

These Videos are all related to the Wuhan virus and how we, the citizens, are being mislead by the “experts” at the NIH and CDC and who are all controlled by Bill Gates and his money. What is happening today is an attempt to break the will of the American People so they can change us from a Constitutional Republic into a single party (Progressive) fascist state. And by the way there is no meaningful difference between Fascism and Marxism as in both systems the people are oppressed. The Democrat party is the progressive party and that is what they want! They want total control of the citizens!

The heading in black are for videos that are loaded on my blog so they should be there. The ones in Red are YouTube and so maybe be taken down at some time in the future. I will up date the post as new information comes up and re-post.

Two Doctors Part One

Two Doctors Part Two

Nurse One

Nurse Two

Nurse Three

New York Doctor

Swedish Doctor

Professor Knut Wittkowski

 

Flu History (from CDC)

• The Spanish Flu pandemic (1918-19) killed 675,000 Americans. Today: equates to a bit more than two million dead.

• The “Asian Flu” pandemic of 1957 killed 116,000 Americans. Today: equates to approximately 223,000.

• The “Hong Kong Flu” pandemic of 1968 killed at least 100,000 Americans. Today: equates to 164,915.

• The H1N1 or “Swine Flu pandemic of 2009 killed 12,469 Americans.

• The Normal flu 2010-2011 killed 37,000

• The Normal flu 2011-2012 killed 12,000

• The Normal flu 2012-2013 killed 43,000

• The Normal flu 2013-2014 killed 38,000

• The Normal flu 2014-2015 killed 51,000

• The Normal flu 2015-2016 killed 23,000

• The Normal flu 2016-2017 killed 38,000

• The Normal flu 2017-2018 killed 61,000

• The Normal flu 2018-2019 killed 34,157

• The Normal flu 2019-2020 killed

May 24 2020

Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 2)


SARS-CoV-2 and Remdesivir

Lee Cary image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—May 24, 2020

Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both?

Review of Part 1 Takeaways

  • When political correctness is put aside, SARS-CoV-2 is Covid-19’s real name.
  • The combined staff of the CDC and the NIH is, at last count, about 31,000.
  • The American pharmaceutical company most engaged in the SARS-CoV-2 episode, Gilead Sciences, has a dodgy history, and is being sued by the U.S. Government for patent infringement.
  • Gilead’s drug, Remdesivir, being pushed hard by the federal government’s medical establishment, is a failed effort left over from the search for a hepatitis C drug.

First U.S. SARS-CoV-2 case used Remdesivir on/about January 27  

Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 2)
Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 1)

Two articles recount the ordeal of America’s first patient to struggle with the virus.

One is out of Spokane, Washington. The other, dated February 17, 2020, is from the South China Morning Post, out of Hong Kong, China.

The Post states that the 35-year-old patient flew into the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport on January 15 after visiting relatives in Wuhan, China.  Few other details are reported in the Post.

Here’s how a Spokane paper heralded the story: Spokane Spokesman, January 31, 2020, “Washington state coronavirus patient treated with investigational, unapproved Ebola drug”.

The unnamed male patient was admitted to Providence Regional Medical Center in Everett, WA on January 20.

Although Remdesivir was not approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration, it was available if recommended by a physician for “compassionate use”.

After the drug was administered with patient approval, Dr. Jay Cook, Chief Medical Officer at Providence, said, “To my knowledge this is the first reported case in the world where this drug has been used in a human application against this virus”.

Sometime between January 31 – February 3, the patient was released from the hospital. No other details are available to the public.

The Spokesman quoted Dr. Scott Lindquist, Washington State Epidemiologist: “This is a drug that is not available to the general public. It is released on limited use and really was developed for the Ebola crisis. We do know that the manufacturer of this product is trying to work with China to provide this overseas.”

The article states that, “The World Health Organization declared the outbreak a public health emergency on Thursday (January 30).”

Toward the end of the article, one paragraph signals the CDC’s threat awareness of the virus at the time:

“While health officials stress that the likelihood of the novel coronavirus spreading in the U.S. and Washington is relatively low, anyone who has traveled from Wuhan, China should monitor their symptoms and contact their health care provider if they experience fever, cough or shortness of breath. Symptoms can present themselves in as few as two days or as long as two weeks after exposure, according to the CDC. Risk to the general public is still low, however.”

Compare the CDC’s threat assessment concerning the “novel coronavirus” to what Spokane County Health Officer Dr. Bob Lutz said in a May 7 on-line interview with the Spokesman-Review‘s healthcare reporter who wrote the piece quoted above. The topic was the current situation and the future with regard to the pandemic in Spokane and the region.

Race to mass produce and distribute Remdesivir was well underway in China

Lutz: (9:18) ”We were very ill prepared at the federal level, which, again, has really hampered us at the state level, and therefore at the local level to really proceed and to really address the pandemic in a way that we really could have and or should have.”  

Reporter: ”…when did you really start reading about Covid-19 in other parts of the world and start to get concerned, and I’m curious if you started sounding alarms in our health district here and started preparing here, when did that thought process begin with you and started to affect your work?”  

Lutz: (10:05) “The first awareness we had in the United States was soon, you know, late December – early January, and I think to Department of Health’s credit, as you know, was it in in the media a week ago, a week and a half ago, they noted that they had essentially been monitoring Covid-19 for over 100 days. We did not have formal recognition of monitoring,  but with that said, anybody who was in public health following infectious disease, epidemiology, health officers, we were well aware of the fact that an epidemic which was certainly in the making in China was, without doubt, going to move to the United States. And as it did, we were quickly monitoring it. So I think, that to our credit, we actually did have an incident command structure, we had that incident command set up in, I wanna say, late January – early February, and we were meeting…and then, obviously, when the very first case developed in Washington State, that really raised everybody’s awareness.  So, we saw it coming. We were very much concerned about it. Were we prepared? Internally, we had done enough preparation, we had plans in place…(11:35) But overall I would say that it’s been challenging because the preparation, really not so much locally, and not so much at the state level, but preparedness was really not to the degree that it should have been.”

Lutz clearly believes the big federal health agencies downplayed the threat.

Much of the U.S. media blames President Trump for a perceived lack of pandemic preparedness. But, the primary responsibility for preparing to deal with national diseases is assigned to the senior leadership of the CDC and the NIH. That includes Dr. Anthony Fauci.

Meanwhile, the race to mass produce and distribute Remdesivir was well underway in China.

Labs in China compete to corner the Remdesivir market

February 17, the Post stated that, “China has begun enrolling Covid-19 patients into a clinical trial of the antiviral, which was developed by the pharmaceutical company Gilead.”

Gilead

February 6: “Wuhan Institute of Virology Applies for a Patent on Gilead’s Remdesivir”

“The Wuhan Institute of Virology announced on February 4, 2020 that they applied for a Chinese patent on Gilead’s Remdesivir for treating the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) that originated in Wuhan in late 2019.  The Chinese patent application was filed on January 21, 2020 and the Institute plans to file internationally via the Patent Cooperation Treaty.”

February 12: “Coronavirus: China’s BrightGene Manufactures APIs of Gilead’s Remdesivir”

“A publicly traded Chinese drug developer, BrightGene Bio-Medical Technology Co., said today it has successfully manufactured the active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) of remdesivir (GS-5734), the Gilead Science antiviral candidate being tested in China human clinical trials as a treatment for the 2019-nCoV novel coronavirus.”

“‘[BrightGene] actively responded to the national call to fight the new coronavirus (2019-nCoV) epidemic, and recently successfully developed and synthesized the technology and preparations for the drug synthesis of [remdesivir] technology,’ the company stated today.”

“‘The company successfully imitated the development and production of [remdesivir] APIs by virtue of its technical accumulation in the development of high-end APIs and special injections,’ BrightGene added in its statement, issued through the Shanghai Stock Exchange. ‘The company has produced [remdesivir] bulk drugs, and the batch production of Remdesivir preparations is in progress.’”

“BrightGene acknowledged that its marketing of remdesivir ‘still needs to be authorized’ by Gilead, adding, ‘There are many uncertainties in this process, such as drug approval.’ BrightGene did not discuss in its statement what if any efforts the company has undertaken to pursue authorization from Gilead for the imitation product: ‘If the product can be approved for marketing, it will be supplied to relevant patients mainly through donations during the epidemic.’”

Wuhan institute of Virology

February 13:

“Last week, researchers at China’s Wuhan Institute of Technology applied for a Chinese patent for the use of Gilead Sciences antiviral candidate remdesivir as a treatment for coronavirus, potentially in combination with chloroquine.”

 

 

Several China labs rushed to field-test Remdesivir

Meanwhile, as several China labs rushed to field-test Remdesivir as mitigating the effects of a virus that came out of one of their facilities – Wuhan Institute of Technology – let’s review Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, interview with USA TODAY’s Editorial Board on Monday, February 17:

“The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention will be testing for the coronavirus in people in five major cities who show up at clinics with flu-like symptoms but who test negative for the seasonal varieties.  If that testing shows the virus has slipped into the country in places federal officials don’t know about, ‘we’ve got a problem,’ Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, told USA TODAY’s Editorial Board Monday.”

“Short of that, Fauci says skip the masks unless you are contagious, don’t worry about catching anything from Chinese products and certainly don’t avoid Chinese people or restaurants…Fauci doesn’t want people to worry about coronavirus, the danger of which is ‘just minuscule.’ But he does want them to take precautions against the ‘influenza outbreak, which is having its second wave.”

“‘We have more kids dying of flu this year at this time than in the last decade or more,’ he said. ‘At the same time people are worrying about going to a Chinese restaurant. The threat is (we have) a pretty bad influenza season, particularly dangerous for our children.’”

SARS-CoV-2 is on the verge of an outbreak in the U.S. and Fauci is more focused on a possible bad flu season. Dr. Lutz in Eastern Washington was ahead of him.

On January 26, Fauci told “The Cats Roundtable” on 970 AM-N.Y. that: “It (Covid-19) isn’t something the American public needs to worry about or be frightened about, because we have ways of preparing and screening people coming in [from China].” In short, “We got this.”

Here’s the status of SARS-CoV-2 at the end of January, and into early February:

While the leading spokesperson for the federal government’s medical establishment, Dr. Fauci, is preaching a passive approach to a disease that the CDC knows has already entered the country in Washington State, Chinese labs are running full speed to produce Gilead’s Remdesivir in an effort to (1) service an undisclosed medical need in China and/or (2) corner the market before the West suffers the full impact of a disease that likely came out of one of their labs.

Next: The Remdesivir vs. Hydroxychloroquine debate heats up, amidst censoring from YouTube. And, the initial focus on lab science melds with political science.   

May 24 2020

Just A Spoonful of Sugar Helps the Medicine Go Down


Restoring America’s Greatness — Stand Together

Ray DiLorenzo image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—May 23, 2020

Restoring America's Greatness -- Stand Together

Does President Trump and the COVID-19 Team (The Team), that he has so depended on, have two different agendas, with different objectives? Is The Team taking orders from Democrats for political purposes? They both have resisted relaxing the lockdown. They both initially resisted taking any action at all. It is no secret that the DNC is using the pandemic to develop and introduce a socialist alternative to recovery. A ‘recovery’ which would keep millions of people from being free and independent. Are they lacing their ‘medicine’ with sugar, making it effectively compelling?

There is coming to light ‘lockdown deaths’ caused by accidents, mental problems and domestic violence

The president firmly believes that fighting the pandemic and putting the country back on course as soon as possible has always been the goal, what he thought everyone, regardless of Party, wanted and was working towards. The president trusted The Team’s medical expertise to make sound decisions he knew would touch millions.

It has not turned out that way. There is no proof that the lockdowns, and the havoc that has ensued have in any way prevented any deaths. In fact, it may have been the contrary. Thousands of elderly have died in assisted care facilities because some blue state governors ordered infected patients be moved to nursing homes for treatment. Countries like Sweden that did not lockdown show no significant difference in death rate if you remove from the stats ‘Covid related’ death, the New York Times found. There is coming to light ‘lockdown deaths’ caused by accidents, mental problems and domestic violence.

Many on The Team and other advisors are Obama holdovers. They originally had no great fear of COVID-19 and even advised against any lockdowns, social distancing or travel restrictions. I remember watching Fauci on TV saying COVID-19 is of no big concern. When President Trump ended travel between China and the United States, he was met with massive resistance from the Democrats, and, of course, called a racist. It was almost as if they needed time for the virus to take root. Yes, they are that evil. There is wide-spread talk out of Washington that Democrats have been giddy as of late. An economic catastrophe in an election year. How marvelous.

The Covid Team’s inconsistencies are suspect. First, it was no big deal, then people like Robert Redfield, CDC director, were predicting millions of deaths. The Team then pushed hard for social distancing, no hand shaking, self quarantine, masks, the closing of small and big businesses nationwide that provide livelihoods for millions of Americans, church congregants prevented from worshiping and threatened with legal action. They threw millions of people into the frigid ocean and then took away their life jackets, telling them the jackets were going to kill them.

Fauci has changed his mind once again

Now Fauci has changed his mind once again. It seems he no longer thinks the lockdown is a very good idea. I wonder how many people truly understand the damage that has been caused to our economy and our country.

Letting no crisis go to waste, blue states everywhere are continuing their lockdowns, crushing millions of small businesses, airlines, and great companies like Pier One, JC Penny, Victoria’s Secret, J. Crew, and Neiman Marcus. People are being arrested, threatened, and fined for going back to work to provide for their families. Going to the beach to swim and you risk arrest. Democrats are emptying prisons, conducting aerial and cell phone surveillance of citizens, especially in Baltimore. They are pushing for a new normal. Some even suggested that handshaking should be forever banned, trashing thousands of years of social custom. Inexpensive drugs like Hydroxycloroquine have been diminished even though many doctors attest to its effectiveness. Doctors everywhere were told to put COVID-19 as the cause of death for almost all deaths from any disease. Hospitals were given extra federal funding for deaths even remotely related to COVID-19 to drive up the numbers.

What an awesome, once in a lifetime opportunity for the Left and every swamp creature to create millions of new government dependents, keep people in fear, socially separated, apart, not to mention the side benefit of preventing the dreaded, packed, Trump rallies. All this in an election year. It may possibly ensure, not only the Left’s survival, but the guardianship of their power and fortunes remaining firmly intact for the foreseeable future.

We are seeing a rebooting of the entire country and much of the Western World for a disease that kills less than 1% of its victims!

Democrats are pushing and voting for ‘emergency’ bills that create millions of dependents, provide for their favorite institutions, and produce schemes like mail-in voting without ID that will safeguard their seats against loss, at a cost of trillions.

If allowed to continue, the reaction to this virus will have grave consequences well beyond the disease.

COVID-19, as it has turned out, is no Black Death of the 17th century, where more than 30% of Eurasia and North Africa died, some 25 million people. We are seeing a rebooting of the entire country and much of the Western World for a disease that kills less than 1% of its victims!

There is, without a doubt, a powerful political component to this pandemic.

In the Democrats’ attempt to show America who is boss, Americans everywhere are standing up, returning fire, unwilling to see their nation become a third world country. They are no longer willing to watch as their livelihoods and families are destroyed, creating more grief than this so called pandemic could possibly create.

Standing up together, we will not stand down. We’re going to have to be stubborn

Americans are defying government mandates to stay home. Virginia Governor, Northam had to ditch orders keeping beaches closed after thousands showed up anyway.

New York City, in particular, has been a tremendous disappointment. For a tough town, they’ve allowed a communist, good-for-nothing bully of a mayor to push them around to oblivion while the elite have left the city. De Blasio has effectively canceled the First Amendment, making it illegal to peacefully assemble and protest.

The Democrats have been telling us for years that open borders and globalism are the keys to humanity’s ills. In reality, it is just the opposite. They have allowed this virus, however historically insignificant, to take hold, create fear, and destroy millions of families. It has acquiesced to evil nations the ability to devastate our economy, attempt to destroy our power, sovereignty, and independence. We saw a clear example when we found that our medicines were not produced here, but in China.

Never in this country’s history has there been such a massive assemblage of corruption and treachery. Neither the nation, nor its people are of any concern to these conspirators.

Patriotic Americans have figured it out. The cure is not dependence no matter how much sugar is in the pill. If taken, the medicine will prove to be worse than the disease. Standing up together, we will not stand down. We’re going to have to be stubborn.