QUESTION: Do you support Trump’s wall?

ANSWER: A wall will not end the crisis. You can use boats as well. What are the issues? First, the purpose of the wall is to stop the drug trade. It will put a dent into it, but it will not eradicate it. Second, is the immigration. There are many people along the border who want to stop the illegal immigration because they bring in kids who then go to school and cause taxes to rise yet these people do not pay income taxes. The solution is very simple. Eliminate income taxes and compel states to survive on consumption taxes. Then it will not matter who is here, everyone will pay their fair share.

If it is really just about illegal immigration, then you can deal with that financially. Many illegal immigrants come to the States to earn money to send home. Prevent sending money to Mexico and you will change the incentives. Any Mexican who in the USA legally, has a bank account and can send money to relatives legitimately. Illegal immigrants would not be able to send money home but then you would probably create a black market.

The Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto is refusing to meet with Trump was the worst possible decision he could have ever made. He just cut off diplomatic relations with the United States. He will now not be taken seriously and cannot in any way negotiate behind the curtain. He just killed US-Mexican relations. Refusing to even talk eliminates the possibility of resolution.

Let’s dig deeper. Many people come to the States for employment. There are many businesses who need labor willing to do hard work for Americans as a rule see that beneath them. Therefore, you have a demand for labor in the United States that goes unfulfilled and you have people willing to be hard workers in Mexico. The solution here is also simple. Introduce a market-based visa system whereby you can buy a visa for such jobs. The employers would gladly pay the fee and you would end smuggling people into the States for those jobs.

Clamping on 35% tariffs on all foreign goods introduced makes no sense. It will not change the real core problem. American unions sent their own jobs overseas because they were too abusive in their demands. Companies leave NOT merely because they can hire someone for $10 and hour less in Mexico than at home. The United States tax code is insane. It soars during Democrat control and declines during Republican control. Companies cannot construct a business plan because the tax swings are insane. Would you rent an apartment with a lease that said the landlord can raise your rent anytime he want on a whim? You cannot build a plant and then draft a business plan for 20 years when taxes can change at any time.

The ONLY way to create economic stability is to make taxation UNTOUCHABLE. We have to end this Marxist way of running our country. Until that is accomplished, we will always look for band-aids to keep the game going between elections.

Columbia University Economist Joseph Stiglitz says that the United States should phase out currency and move towards a digital economy. All of these people advocating such policies are ignorant of the real world and advocate total government control. Stiglitz told the World Economic Forum that their are “benefits that outweigh the cost.” He hailed India for eliminating 86% of all currency. This is the only way they see to force socialism down everyone’s throats. Instead of looking at why the system is failing, they want more power to create absolute control like a communist state.

While the communist model was that government owned everything, the new model allows private ownership, but they will simply seize whatever they desire. We retain title, but they retain the right to say how much can you keep.

Of course, the left is focusing on how much the “rich” pay while ignoring the entire issue of taxes. When I debated Steve Forbes and Governor James Florio at Princeton University, it was the Democrat Florio who I turned. I simply said that the tax code borrowed from the poor and middle class, handed them refund checks at the end of the year, and was borrowing from them without paying any interest. I then added that Social Security was just a tax that denied the average person the RIGHT to prepare for their future by investing that money, yet they argue that the stock market rises and ONLY the rich get richer. The left are brilliant conman because they always point at how the rich don’t pay enough, but they NEVER look closely what government does to them.

Already, all we hear is how Trump is trying to lower taxes for himself and friends. The stupidity of those who even say this is beyond belief. They are so brainwashed that you have to wonder if they are capable of independent thoughts. Trump’s tax plan involves collapsing the current seven-tier bracket system into just three brackets. The lower bracket, those who make less than $75,000, would pay only 12%. The next tier would be those who earn $75,000-$225,000, who would then pay 25%. Those in the third-tier are workers with incomes of more than $225,000 who would pay 33%. This boils down to expanding the net disposable income for taxpayers making between $48,000 and $88,000 annually, as they would save between $1,174 and $7,052, according to the Tax Foundation.

The top rate proposed by the new administration (33%) is substantially lower than the maximum rate under President Obama (43.8%). Furthermore, a standard deduction of $12,000 means, on average, the middle class will get an additional $12k worth of tax-exempt income. Economic growth comes from CONSUMER spending. Increase the net disposable income and that will jump-start the economy. Of course, the Democrats will oppose this because they never saw a dollar they did not want to get their hands on. They tend to forget their history; the FIRST tax cut after World War II was implemented by John F. Kennedy.

“It is a paradoxical truth that tax rates are too high and tax revenues are too low and the soundest way to raise the revenues in the long run is to cut the rates now … Cutting taxes now is not to incur a budget deficit, but to achieve the more prosperous, expanding economy which can bring a budget surplus.”

– John F. Kennedy, Nov. 20, 1962, president’s news conference

“Lower rates of taxation will stimulate economic activity and so raise the levels of personal and corporate income as to yield within a few years an increased – not a reduced – flow of revenues to the federal government.”

– John F. Kennedy, Jan. 17, 1963, annual budget message to the Congress, fiscal year 1964

“In today’s economy, fiscal prudence and responsibility call for tax reduction even if it temporarily enlarges the federal deficit – why reducing taxes is the best way open to us to increase revenues.”

– John F. Kennedy, Jan. 21, 1963, annual message to the Congress: “The Economic Report Of The President”