Tag Archives: Scientific Integrity

May 29 2020

The Media Wants America to Stay Closed Forever


The pandemic has been a disaster for America and a huge gift for the media’s fear-based programming

Daniel Greenfield image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—May 29, 2020

The Media Wants America to Stay Closed Forever

CNN doubled its audience in April, while MSNBC hit its best total-day ratings. Network news programs rose 39% since last year, gaining over 8 million viewers for their best numbers in over a decade. Cable news networks have become the most watched channels on cable and network news has been beating prime time programming. The pandemic is the next best thing to Walter Cronkite rising from the dead.

The New York Times is up to 6 million subscribers with an increase of 587,000 digital subscriptions that it attributes to “widespread interest in news of the coronavirus pandemic”. Last year the paper was struggling to make it to 5 million subscribers. Digital subscriptions are up across the industry. Digital subscriptions rose 29% at the Dallas Morning News, 17% at the Honolulu Star-Advertiser, and the Poynter-FactCheck’s Tampa Bay Times boasted of tripling the rate of digital subscriptions.

A Captive Audience

(That didn’t stop the Tampa Bay Times from getting an SBA loan at the expense of small businesses.)

With 87% of Americans saying that they’re closely following news of the coronavirus pandemic, while many of them are trapped indoors, the media is experiencing an unprecedented boom. And with millions of kids out of school, it’s even begun launching new ventures to exploit the pandemic like NBC News’ coronavirus newscast for kids. It’s a terrible time for Americans, but a great one for the media.

The only thing that could rain on the media’s pandemic parade would be the country reopening.

Right now, the media has the American public right where it wants it, trapped indoors, and closely following whatever combination of reporting, propaganda, and lies it chooses to feed to them.

And the polls show that it’s working.

Most of the country is afraid. A not insignificant percentage of the electorate is convinced that it will die if its cohort leaves the house without a mask, and would like to keep receiving government checks forever. Media hysteria not only trashed the economy, but sold millions on the socialist lifestyle.

After the Russia hoax, a botched impeachment, and more hit pieces than even historians will be able to count, the media is achieving its grand ideological goal of endangering President Trump’s reelection.

All the media had to do was scare the public within an inch of its life into crawling under the bed

To quote the nation’s first Republican president, “you may fool people for a time; you can fool a part of the people all the time; but you can’t fool all the people all the time.” That’s always been the problem with the media’s business model. It has a core audience that it can fool all the time. But it can’t have any real power unless it reaches beyond the urbanites and suburbanites concentrated in a few blue areas.

As the warmer weather swept in, social distancing began to collapse, accelerating reopenings in red states, and putting pressure on blue states to step up. Even New York and California have been forced to move up their timetables while struggling with the crowds headed to the beach or socializing in parks.

Every state has now moved toward lifting their lockdowns to one degree or another.

And the people aren’t waiting for the politicians to act. The median distance people have been traveling, based on cell phone data, doubled from half a mile to a mile. The shutdown is being shut down.

Now it’s the media’s turn to be afraid.

The Atlantic condemned Governor Brian Kemp’s decision to reopen Georgia as an “experiment in human sacrifice”. But, Coronavirus cases have dropped 20% since the reopening. So, the media has doubled down on its false claims by spinning conspiracy theories about the Georgia and Florida numbers.

They’re out to get you… out of the house. And away from your TV.

After a Florida state employee who had been inputting numbers into the state’s virus dashboard was fired, the media insisted that she had been silenced for refusing to cover up the “real” numbers. The media neglected to mention that she had been arrested for cyber-stalking and revenge porn.

It has since moved on to suggesting a cover-up at the CDC.

In a matter of weeks, the media has gone from urging evidence-based policymaking that follows the numbers, to telling its viewers, listeners, and readers to ignore the numbers because it’s a conspiracy.

CNN has taken the lead in spinning conspiracies about Georgia, Florida, and the CDC, while failing to disclose to its viewers and readers that it has a major vested interest in maintaining the lockdown.

Politicians have wrongly deemed the media to be non-essential. That means that CNN can remain in business while calling for lockdowns of countless small businesses and forced unemployment for millions even as its ratings soar because all the people it put out of work are at home watching TV.

Beyond the ideological conflict of interest, CNN has a huge economic conflict of interest.

The media is resisting any effort to lift the lockdowns because the closure rules don’t apply to it

So does the rest of the media. The lockdowns are a form of economic discrimination that structurally benefits the media, freeing it to produce original programming while most television and film production has been shut down. Now the nerds at the news desk are able to beat everything else. All they had to do was make sure that not a single professional sports league was still playing in the USA.

If only they’d thought of that back when they were working on the high school paper.

And yet, at no point in time, has the media bothered explaining this simple fact to its viewers.

The media is resisting any effort to lift the lockdowns because the closure rules don’t apply to it. They never did. CNN was able to keep its staff working even while the pandemic was ravaging New York City. While viewers saw that top anchors were working from home, that was as much of an illusion as Chris Cuomo’s quarantine. The anchors stayed home, but much of the rank and file workforce did not.

Another way of looking at the lockdowns is that they act as media rent-seeking programs, providing a lifeline to a struggling industry by shutting down its rivals and creating a captive audience.

The pandemic has been a disaster for America and a huge gift for the media’s fear-based programming

The media wants America to stay closed forever. And if it were up to it, that’s what would happen.

The New York Times, CNN, MSNBC, and the rest of the corrupt media cartel have nothing to gain from the country reopening and everything to lose. And the cartel is corruptly influencing public policy with propaganda, with disinformation, and with conspiracy theories in order to serve its own interests.

The pandemic has been a disaster for America and a huge gift for the media’s fear-based programming.

Americans look out at a country that they no longer recognize. They see a place where the Bill of Rights doesn’t apply, where neighbors and loved ones have been indoctrinated by the media to fear each other, and where the recent economic boom seems like a distant memory. But the media sees a vast captive audience and it has no intention of releasing its #StayAtHome captives without a fight.

Every media article, segment, and story against the lockdown is nothing more than digital slave owners fighting to keep its captive audience on the plantation. The reopenings are a liberation, not only allowing people to go back to work, to school, and to reunite with their loved ones, but freeing millions of people hiding indoors, in thrall to the media’s fear campaign, and releasing them into the light.

May 29 2020

Civil Unrest Turning Violent on Schedule


Armstrong Economics Blog/Civil Unrest

Re-Posted May 29, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

The civil unrest is turning violent right on schedule. These lockdowns have destroyed so many jobs and the future of people which the government never even bothered to consider. The more governments try to pretend they did the right thing, the greater the violence will become.

I went to get my haircut the other day. The woman said she just received her unemployment check. Two and a half months with no income. She said she was a saver, and if she had not been, her and her children would have starved. She then added – “They better not try this again!”

The economic damage to the vast majority of people is beyond description. So far, it looks like at least 5% of small businesses will not reopen. The local mall had Sears, which shut down before, J.C Penney which is closing, and Macy’s. Retail will never be the same.

May 29 2020

Is it Time to Throw Every Politician Out of Office Who Imposed Lockdowns?


Armstrong Economics Blog/Disease

Re-Posted May 29, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

There is a rising discontent against politicians who have scared the hell out of people using this virus. They did so without ANY justification other than a bogus old program from Imperial College, funded by Bill Gates, that used a stochastic to try to forecast the future like the child’s game Sim City. The polls are showing that 40% of Republicans are against these lockdowns and do not trust Bill Gates. Meanwhile, YouTube is in an all-out war against free speech. They will use any excuse they can use to remove content exposing the false evidence of this virus. Now, they are even supporting the climate change agenda as they removed Michael Moore’s documentary exposing the fake agenda of that movement. We have Twitter claiming it has a right to do fact-checking only on Trump. They do not fact check the WHO, Fauci, Bill Gates, or the CDC. We have Twitter entering political censorship if it disagrees with their political agenda.

Thailand has 56 deaths out of 69 million people. Japan has announced no lockdown as there were only 850 deaths 126.5 million. What they will NOT tell you is that the COMMON COLD is typically a coronavirus, which is very common! In the United States, colds are more common in the fall and winter, because of the tendency for people to remain indoors. Inside, air tends to be drier. Dry air dries up the nasal passages, which can lead to infection. Humidity levels also tend to be lower in colder weather. Cold viruses are better able to survive in low humidity conditions. Lockdowns are the opposite of health advice. You need fresh air.

A study has been leaked from Germany showing that there have been more deaths from the lockdown denying people medical services than there were by the fake virus. The death rate in Germany was 0.3%. Christian Drosten, who directs the Institute of Virology at the Charité Hospital in Berlin, was one of those who identified the Sars virus in 2003. As the head of the German public health institute’s reference lab on coronaviruses, he has become the government’s go-to expert on the related virus causing the current pandemic. He is the person responsible for destroying so many jobs and lives in Germany with his recommendation to shut down the economy. These people have no concept of the economy or people’s lives at all!

Nevertheless, we still have the left media trying to scare people to stay home to undermine the economy as much as possible. The New York Times wrote, “Models Project Sharp Rise in Deaths as States Reopen,” which are the same models that predicted 2 million deaths before! The question is WHY is the leftist press continuing to destroy the economy? What is their objective?

To further the climate change and support Bill Gates’ agenda to further vegetarian meat substitutes, which he has a huge stake in, he is advocating shutting down meat producers to lower CO2. We have actually Christophe Derrien, the secretary general of the industry organization in the European Union, pushing us to eat insects rather than meat as part of this climate change agenda. You really cannot make up this stuff.

In Germany, a couple was fined €1000 for taking a walk with their child. Meanwhile, in Italy: “Government hires tens of thousands of volunteers to control distance rules.” The pension systemhas cracked wide-open in Germany, necessitating tax increases all because of this overreaction to the virus by politicians without ANY regard for the economic consequences. Then people like New York Governor Cuomo hands out immunity like candy to nursing homes who donated over $2 million for his reelection. Even the sex workers in Switzerland are broke and starting to demand changes.

Just how far can these people push us before this turns into massive violence? Hopefully, the people will rise up and vote every politician out of office who has supported lockdowns around the world. They really need to be shown that accountability is important. Due to all of the economic destruction they have imposed, they will NEVER admit they were wrong. They MUST somehow keep in place what they proposed and continue to cite fake studies and models to pretend they were right. This is not going to go over well. The sooner these people are removed from office, the SAFER society will be. No politicians will now come out and even say “sorry” about that! They would rather start a war with China to retain personal power!

May 29 2020

Are Prison Camps for Children Emerging?


Armstrong Economics Blog/Disease

Re-Posted May 29, 2020 by Martin Armstrong
May 28 2020

Videos on Bill Gates and his Handmaiden Dr. Anthony Fauci and Their Plan to Reduce the Word’s Population that Google doesn’t want You to See!


Bill Gates was a ruthless businessman and used any means legal or not to achieve his goal. Ho he accomplished that is not the story here but the bottom line was after he retired he created a 501(c)(3)  Foundation, The Bill & Melisa Gates Foundation twenty years ago in 2000. The stated goal was the created an illusion that this foundation was created to help the poor and destitute of the world, nothing could be further from the truth. The foundation started off with $46.8 billion and Gates started giving large grants to implement his stated goals.

No one knows exactly how much money Gates gave away but it was, without doubt, tens of billions of dollars over the past 20 years. Gates made sure the world knew what he was doing through his extensive publicity efforts. However strangely the latest financial records of the foundation indicates that it’s assets are probably worth over $100 billion today. So it would seem that Gates was doing more than giving away grant money. So what was his real purpose of this foundation?

Initially his focus seemed to be on Climate change and how it was imperative that we stop using carbon based fuels that were creating Carbon Dioxide (CO2) and that was causing the temperature of the planet to increase and that that increasing temperature would in the near future destroy civilization itself.  Gates was not alone in this believe as Al Gore the former President Clinton VP was also on board with this idea. I became aware of this is a famous TED talk where Gates indicated that that to get to zero emissions of Carbon Dioxide production my humans would have to go to zero. Later it became obvious that this college drop out was not educated as he was being influence by those that followed the dis bunked theory of Tomas Malthus found in his 1798 book An Essay on the Principle of Population, Which basically stated that the growth of the population would out strip the ability to feed it and that would create famine and war. 222 years later, today, we know that was not true.  But Gates apparently does think it is true and it seems that his REAL GOAL is to significantly reduce the world’s population.

The following bits of videos will show that Gate and Fauci (a hired hand of Gates) probably created this COVID-19 pandemic in Wuhan China and hid its release in China and the World Health organization until it had spread world wide. This two both need to be tried for Crimes against Humanity for example from a NIH 2005 study, that found that “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” Fauci has been rejecting the use of this and has been preaching the Gates vaccine solution. The report stated:

“We report, however, that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-COV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage. In addition to the well-known functions of chloroquine such as elevations of endosomal pH, the drug appears to interfere with terminal glycosylation of the cellular receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. This may negatively influence the virus-receptor binding and abrogate the infection, with further ramifications by the elevation of vesicular pH, resulting in the inhibition of infection and spread of SARS CoV at clinically admissible concentrations.

 

Conclusion

Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS COV in cell culture. Favorable inhibition of virus spread was observed when the cells were either treated with chloroquine prior to or after SARS COV infection. In addition, the indirect immunofluorescence assay described herein represents a simple and rapid method for screening SARS-COV antiviral compounds.”

Error
This video doesn’t exist
May 28 2020

Newsom Continues to Bully the Church Despite President’s Directive


David Martin image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—May 28, 2020

Newsom Continues to Bully the Church Despite President's Directive

L.A., California—In an attempt to continue state surveillance of churches because of COVID-19, Governor Newsom of California has all but ignored President Trump’s directive to allow churches to reopen without interference from the state.

At a press briefing on May 22, the president made it clear that governors and state officials were given until the weekend to lay off the churches by allowing them to reopen without restrictions and regulations.

“I call upon governors to allow our churches and places of worship to open right now,” the president said. “If they don’t do it I will override the governors.”

The president said nothing about allowing continued restrictions but ardently defended religious groups that are demanding a full return of their religious practice in church. “The people are demanding to go to church and synagogue,” he said. “Many millions of Americans embrace worship as an essential part of life.”

Fake Compliance

While feigning compliance to Trump’s directive by merely allowing churches to crack their doors open, Governor Newsom,  in league with the California Department of Public Health,  issued a ruling on May 25 stating that churches “must therefore limit attendance to 25% of building capacity or a maximum of 100 attendees, whichever is lower.

So, the Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels in Los Angeles that accommodates 3,000 people must now limit attendance to 100 people, or a church that seats 100 people can only allow 25 people to come and worship. If this isn’t unveiled discrimination against religion, what is!

Here the liquor stores, supermarkets, and pizza parlors are brimming over with activity with virtually no restrictions imposed while the church is being oppressed and put in the doghouse because Newsom and state bureaucrats want to make fun of religion.

The president indicated that basic common sense measures to adopt such as social distancing and use of face masks should be up to the churches to decide for themselves, but Newsom and state officials have set themselves up as political deities to impose their own set of socialist ‘commandments’ on the people.

Key prevention practices being imposed on houses of worship by the governor include:

  • Physical distancing to the maximum extent possible
  • Use of face coverings by employees, volunteers, and congregants/visitors
  • Frequent hand washing and regular cleaning and disinfection
  • Training employees and volunteers on these and other elements of the states COVID-19 prevention plan

Moreover, the state’s new guidelines strongly recommend “discontinuing singing, group recitation (e.g. the Rosary after Mass), and other practices and performances” and that churches “modify practices such as limiting the number of people reciting or singing, ensuring physical distancing greater than six feet between people.”

The state furthermore advises “modifying practices that are specific to particular traditions” which include “discontinuing kissing of ritual objects [relics]” and “offering Communion in the hand instead of on the tongue.”

Heinous Violation

The state has no right making such recommendations or imposing juridical rules, as they are blasphemous and violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, i.e. Separation of Church and State, which prevents the state from interfering with the church. The governor’s ruling is loaded with regulation and constitutes a gross intrusion upon the church—something President Trump did not ask for.

The state ruling says that “This limitation will be in effect for the first 21-days of a county health department’s approval of religious services” after which “the California Department of Public Health, in consultation with county Departments of Public Health, will review and assess the impact of these imposed limits and provide further direction.”

This conceivably could mean that the state could tighten up on its surveillance of churches or even close churches if state officials deem that the first 21 days weren’t effective enough in stopping the spread of COVID-19.

At the May 22 briefing, Trump told states to get off the churches’ backs, but instead the State of California is bombarding churches with rules and recommendations, which if heeded, would scarcely give the faithful a moment to focus on their religious duties. Their attention would now be taken up with a whole new set of rules as if a new state religion had come along to replace that of Christ.

We can only hope that President Trump will double down on his May 22 statement by making it the law of the land that states from henceforth are prohibited from imposing rules and regulations on churches. This would not only restore our freedom of worship but would gain him more votes from the people and many more blessings from above!

May 28 2020

Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 6 – Last in Series)


There is much left to address concerning SARS-CoV-2, best seen clear in the rearview mirror

Lee Cary image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—May 27, 2020

Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both?What do you see in the picture above? Is it the eye of a rabbit looking right, or a bird turned left? Or, both? The same is asked when looking at the SARS-CoV-2 ordeal.

Review of Part 5 Takeaways

  • Conventional wisdom among the Scientific Community—a first cousin of the “Intelligence Community” – never took HCQ seriously as a contender for the role of interim mitigator of virus symptoms until a proven vaccine comes along.
  • Proponents of HCQ, regardless of some very impressive résumés, are treated as kooks by the established science experts.
  • The chief scientist of the World Health Organization recently announced the suspension of HCQ trials because they’re too dangerous, WHO says.

Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 6)
Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 5)
Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 4)
Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 3)
Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 2)
Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 1)

Marshaling an army of “Contact Tracers”

The Grand Re-opening of America may be accompanied by one or more efforts to marshal large groups of contact tracers, tasked to map a new wave of virus victims. Several such efforts are being discussed.

One by-product of the home quarantine of “non-essential” persons, regardless of age, could be the hunt for fresh victims in a second wave of infections. Herd immunity was never given the chance to be established.

The Scientific Community anticipates a new wave of virus victims coming after the nation opens up to normalcy. Some suggest The New Normal will require diligent monitoring of the population, with no end in sight.  And, their thinking is, such monitoring is best done by those trained to trace people with whom the newly infected are/were in contact.  Hence, contact tracing.

On April 18, Bill Clinton and Andrew Cuomo talked contact tracing in the context of a virtual gathering of the Clinton Global Initiative University.

Let’s listen in on their unrehearsed discussion concerning contact tracing, relying on the C-SPAN transcript of the 40 min. video:

Cuomo: (24:19) “We need tracing agents in the hundreds and hundreds of people. You take a trace test – you take a test and then trace back the contact. This has never been done on this scale. This is an army of investigator and tracers, we will do that the best we can with this seven-state consortium, but it could have been done from the federal government on a tighter and more efficient {sic}.” (Cuomo listed six of the seven in northeastern state “consortium”: New Jersey, New York, Massachusetts, Delaware, Rhode Island, and Connecticut.)

Clinton: (24:50) “I agree with you on this, this contact tracing is very important, and it could have enabled our entire country to have a real public health system, a real public health corps (indiscernible) could we make this a part of the current treatment? Is there some other way we could do it?  I’m worried (indiscernible) that they’re trying to get a state contact tracing core, you have to get bodies in there, and they have to be safe while they are tracing.  You cannot just show up in your jeans and t-shirts.  You have to really know what you are doing when you are going into these neighborhoods and trying to run these needs down. Do you think maybe you could get the governors to ask congress to fund that? Or maybe we can spend some of the money, but we need a national core of healthy people who are trying to go out and do contact tracing. We need bodies.”

Partners in Health (PIH) is already engaged with one state in Cuomo’s consortium.  As of May 12:

“Partners in Health was recently selected by Massachusetts governor Charlie Baker to conduct Coronavirus ‘contact tracing,’ a process that involves teams of investigators finding out who infected people have come into contact with. The group is already ‘training and deploying hundreds of contact tracers.’ Some citizens fear the potential for mass surveillance posed by contact tracing, especially in light of a Democrat-introduced bill in Congress to authorize contact tracing ‘at individuals’ residences.’ Partners In Health’s involvement will not assuage many fears, considering the group has received funding from George Soros and Bill Gates organizations and counts Chelsea Clinton on its board of trustees.”

PIH’s 2017 Form 990, posted on Guidestar.com, reported their annual revenue as $127,157,823.

On May 1, in conjunction with the move toward contact tracking, 45 House Democrats, led by Rep. Bobby Rush (IL, 1st Dis.), proposed HR 6666, entitled “Covid-19 Testing, Reaching, and Contacting Everyone (TRACE) Act.” The Bill was referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

HR 6666’s stated purpose is: “To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to award grants to eligible entities to conduct diagnostic testing for COVID–19, and related activities such as contact tracing, through mobile health units and, as necessary, at individuals’ residences, and for other purposes.”

The Bill, a short read, is found here. It suggests $100,000,000,000 (not a typo) funding for fiscal year 2020; and, of course, “such sums as may be necessary for each of fiscal year 2021 and any subsequent fiscal year during which the emergency period continues.”

A population under observation needs immunity documentation

Politico.com announced, on April 10, that:

“Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, revealed Friday the federal government is considering issuing Americans certificates of immunity from the coronavirus, as the Trump administration works to better identify those who have been infected and restart the U.S. economy in the coming weeks. ‘You know, that’s possible,’ Fauci told CNN’s ‘New Day,’ when asked whether he could imagine a time when people across the country carry such forms of identification.”

“‘I mean, it’s one of those things that we talk about when we want to make sure that we know who ‘the vulnerable people are and not,’ he said. ‘This is something that’s being discussed. I think it might actually have some merit, under certain circumstances.’” (bolding added)

In a related comment noted by NPR, Dr. Robert Redfield, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC), said:

“People are looking at all the different modern technology that could be brought to bear to make contact tracing more efficient and effective. Are there more, if you will, say, tech savvy ways to be more comprehensive in contact tracing versus the old-fashioned way? You know, currently, these things are under aggressive evaluation.”

How far and how deep might this future medical surveillance go?

On May 12, Dr. Anthony Fauci dropped a hint when testifying before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions in a hearing about reopening America. He said:

“There’s no guarantee that the vaccine is actually going to be effective.”

Think of that comment as the bookend of an earlier one Fauci made at the Georgetown University Medical Center just a few days before the Inauguration of Trump. Fauci’s speech was titled “Pandemic Preparedness in the Next Administration.” He said:

“There is no question that there will be a challenge to the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases.”

“No question?” None? How did he know that for sure?

Series Conclusion

There is much left to address concerning SARS-CoV-2, best seen clear in the rearview mirror. For example:

  • How did the reactions of Blue and Red state governors vary?
  • How did America’s religious organizations react when the Government closed them?
  • What can we say about the role of the print, internet, televised, and social media?
  • Is there a “new normal” ahead, and what is it?
  • What is the impact on public and private schools, of all ages?
  • What happens the next time there’s a virus event?
  • Was any traditional American freedom sacrificed never to return?
  • How did the nation view the leadership of Donald J. Trump?
  • And critical for geopolitical issues: Why and How did the virus originate?

Regarding the question in the series’ title – “Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both” – that’s for you to answer.

If you’re willing, go to this site’s comment board and write what you think.

This remains, despite all, a free country.

May 28 2020

Twitter—The Big Lie Of Our Time


Meanwhile, If anyone should be “fact checked” or censored, it should be Twitter.

Judi McLeod image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—May 27, 2020

Twitter—The Big Lie Of Our Time
You can get away with calling on wing-nuts with specifics on a lethal way to murder the president of the United States on Twitter as deranged comedian Kathy Griffin just did—but will be flagged by Twitter ‘fact checkers’ for posting tweets that call mail-in ballots “fraudulent” and predicting that “mail boxes will be robbed” if you’re President Donald Trump.

“Comedian and perennial Trump antagonist Kathy Griffin is advocating for the physical assault of the president, tweeting that she wants someone to stab the commander in chief with a “syringe with nothing but air inside” — a potentially lethal act if it creates an embolism. (Breitbart, May 27, 2020)

Physically threatening?

Physically threatening?  How about calling to the cause someone who would kill or assassinate the president?

“Physically threatening the president of the United States is a federal offense. Physical threats also constitute a violation of Twitter’s terms of service that can result in permanently getting kicked off the platform. (Breitbart, May 27, 2020)

“We will immediately and permanently suspend any account found to be posting violent threats,” the social media giant says on its official site.”

Oh, yeah? Then how come Griffin’s Tuesday Tweet with a most descriptive means to take down the President of the U.S. is still riding high on Twitter Wednesday morning?

“For the first time, Twitter has flagged some of President Donald Trump’s tweets with a fact-check warning. ( Yahoo, May 27, 2020)

“On Tuesday, Twitter added a warning phrase to two Trump tweets that called mail-in ballots “fraudulent” and predicted that “mail boxes will be robbed,” among other things. Under the tweets, there is now a link reading “Get the facts about mail-in ballots” that guides users to a Twitter “moments” page with fact checks and news stories about Trump’s unsubstantiated claims.

If Twitter calls Trump’s claims on the legality of mail-in-ballots. “unsubstantiated” then they must be “unsubstantiated”.

“Until now, the president has simply blown past Twitter’s half-hearted attempts to enforce rules intended to promote civility and “healthy” conversation on its most prominent user. Trump frequently amplifies misinformation, spreads abuse and uses his pulpit to personally attack private citizens and public figures alike — all forbidden under Twitter’s official rules. (Yahoo)

In a statement, Twitter said Trump’s vote-by-mail tweets “contain potentially misleading information about voting processes and have been labeled to provide additional context around mail-in ballots.”

“Over the weekend, the president issued several tweets calling into question the legality of mail-in-ballots. The storm of tweets followed Facebook and Twitter posts from Trump last week that wrongly claimed Michigan’s secretary of state mailed ballots to 7.7 million registered voters. Trump later deleted the tweet and posted an edited version that still threatened to hold up federal funds. (Breitbart, May 27, 2020)

“Twitter policy forbids sharing “false or misleading information intended to intimidate or dissuade people from participating in an election or other civic process.” While it has previously flagged tweets, it has never before put warnings on tweets for any other reason.

“Trump replied on Twitter, accusing the platform of “interfering in the 2020 Presidential Election” and insisting that “as president, I will not allow this to happen.”

“His 2020 campaign manager Brad Parscale said Twitter’s “clear political bias” had led the campaign to pull “all our advertising from Twitter months ago.”

Twitter says in its terms of service that “you may not threaten violence against an individual or a group of people. We also prohibit the glorification of violence.”  The company said it defines violent threats as “statements of an intent to kill or inflict serious physical harm on a specific person or group of people.” (Breitbart)

“Federal law states that individuals who physically threaten the president can face up to five years in prison.

That’s the latest political Twitter antics in the U.S.

 
Trudeau Foundation Annual Report (page 37) 2018-2019

“Twitter Canada is listed as a sponsor in the Trudeau Foundation Annual Report…now we know why anything “Trudeau Bad” doesn’t stay on the viewable trending list for long. #CDNpoli. (Twitter)

That proves more than anything else that Twitter’s not just the social media platform for people to deposit their cute, humorous or even vitriolic, evil little messages—but a massive political force in action.

Meanwhile, If anyone should be “fact checked” or censored, it should be Twitter.

May 28 2020

Exposing the Hoaxes Killing America


The New American Video

Linda Goudsmit image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—May 27, 2020

In this interview with The New American’s Alex Newman, author and political analyst Linda Goudsmit outlines some of the pseudo-humanitarian hoaxes that have been used by world-government advocates to undermine American freedom on the road to a New World Order.
May 28 2020

Gates’ Eugenics End Goal – Population Control


Armstrong Economicis Blog/Disease

Re-Posted May 28, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

What is truly amazing is how the mainstream media is so intent upon just accepting whatever Bill Gates says and his entire agenda without the slightest bit of investigation. They just hate Trump so intensely that they do not care what the agenda is behind Gates’ global assault on the economy, arguing we will never be safe 100% without his vaccine, and his insistence of vaccinating the entire world.

None of the mainstream media seem to even think this is a wild agenda. All they have to do is look at Gates’ father and his elitist view of eugenics which drove him to be the head of Planned Parenthood. Why will nobody in the media even look into the subject? Do they assume they are one of the chosen few that are in the elite class with Gates? Do they not care that the entire eugenics movement of the Progressive Era was outright racist?

The American Eugenics Society (AES) was one of the leading theories of the Progressive Movement which emerged out of socialism at the turn of the 20th century. It was founded by the famed eugenicist and conservationist Madison Grant (1865-1937), who was an American lawyer, writer, and zoologist. Madison Grant’s book, The Passing of the Great Race, was devoted to an attempt to give the meaning of history through his view of race. Grant looked at civilization by race, not politics or language. He argued that European ethnic groups such as the Alpine and Nordic races were superior. This book was first published in 1916, and it formed the foundation of the American Eugenics Society of which Bill Gates Sr was a member.

Grant was joined by other leading thinkers and activists of the Progressive Era which included Harry H. Laughlin (1880-1943), who was an American educator, eugenicist, and sociologist, Henry Crampton (1875-1956), who was an American evolutionary biologist and malacologist (branch of invertebrate zoology), Irving Fisher (1867-1947), who was the famous American economist who declared the stock market reached a new plateau in 1929 before the crash. Fisher was a very active Progressive social campaigner. There was also Henry F. Osborn (1857-1935) who was an American paleontologist and geologist.

It was Osborn who articulated the entire Progressive Movement with its subset of eugenics based on conservationism which saw that reducing population would further civilization and that those who were poor were really holding back society. This was the common view of the time being put forth by the elite, that namely heredity is superior to influences from the environment. Nobody could be educated in reality, it was all heredity. Therefore, Osborn expressed the view of the AES that distinct races existed with fixed hereditary traits. He concluded that the Nordic or Anglo-Saxon “race” was the highest. Osborn supported eugenics to preserve “good” racial stock which is why he endorsed Grant’s book writing both the second and fourth prefaces for him.

The AES described eugenics as the study of improving the genetic composition of humans through the controlled reproduction of different races and classes of people. This elitist end-goal remains that of Bill Gates despite the fact he will not come out publicly and state that he is focusing on India and Africa for this group has long viewed them as the bottom of race within society. This is why he is so obsessed with population control.

It was Gates to called together a group of Billionaires to sell his concerns about reducing the population in 2009. While we know that was the topic, nobody wants to talk about details. This entire Coronavirus scam is part of his end-goal to control the population. It was even Gates who has funded remote control birth-control by implanting chips into women. Then Gates will be able to turn on and off births according to whatever criteria he desires like a TV with remote control. That will lead to only one place – required permission and permits to even have children.

Given Gates’ father’s involvement in Planned Parenthood and a member of eugenics, you would think someone would investigate. Add Gates’ push to then eliminate all paper money to be able to tag everyone on the planet and control the entire world economy through his ID efforts, you would think this is the plot of a James Bond megalomaniac villain. Microsoft even just announced on January 9, 2020, their Microsoft Identity solutions project. Gates resigned from the board of Microsoft allegedly only to try to distance himself for PR purposes.

The US Supreme Court actually upheld their eugenics views in Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927), where the United States Supreme Court, written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., actually ruled that a state statute permitting compulsory sterilization of the unfit, including the intellectually disabled, “for the protection and health of the state” did not violate the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The Supreme Court actually wrote: “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” The Supreme Court has never expressly overturned Buck v. Bell. This was the precise theory behind the Nazi movement to adopt eugenics terminating all disabled people and later moved to ethnic cleansing.

Interestingly, before the revelation of the death camps of the Nazis was finally exposed in July 1944 where they were carrying out the mass murder of millions of European Jews, Gypsies, the intellectually disabled, physically disabled veterans, dissidents, and homosexuals between 1933 and 1945, eugenics was an acceptable theory. Only after what the Nazis were doing was the word eugenics swapped for population control.

The Supreme Court ruled on eugenics once again in Skinner v. State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Williamson, 316 U.S. 535 (1942). Here, the United States Supreme Court ruled that held that laws permitting the compulsory sterilization of criminals were unconstitutional if the sterilization law treats similar crimes differently. In this case, the Oklahoma law applied to “habitual criminals” but it did exclude white-collar crimes. That could have applied to even traffic tickets which are a crime. The Court held that treating similar crimes differently violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.

The AES was renamed the Society for the Study of Social Biology in 1972. Whether Bill Gates is targeting Africa and India paying bribes to corrupt politicians to carry out his vaccinations is another topic just ignored by mainstream media. To them, Bill Gates walks on water. Is Gates target what his father regarded as the lowest races on earth, or is that where he could just bribe his way into the governments to use their population for his grand plan? Nobody will even raise the question in mainstream media. The real question is how long will it take for the people to rise up against their own corrupt politicians now trying to take what Gates has done in Africa and India and impose it by decree in America and Europe?