How Companies Prevent Unionization – Diversifying the Workforce


Posted originally on Aug 15, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

LGBTQ

Divide and conquer is a common technique used by businesses to prevent unionization. Numerous studies throughout the years have discovered that highly diverse workforces have a far lower risk of forming a union. The same phenomenon is found through divisive politics, which aims to weaken the strength of the people by dividing us from our identities as citizens and instigating an emotional response that causes us to align more so with our race, gender, religion, social class, and voting patterns rather than citizens of a nation. In the workforce, DEI initiatives are only intended to weaken the power of the collective.

Racial Diversity and Union Organizing in the United States, 1999–2008, published in 2015, analyzed 7,000 organizations between 1999 and 2008 to see which ones were more likely to unionize. Researchers compared the National Labor Relations Board’s information on union activity with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s surveys of large establishments to identify racial diversity among employees. “The study finds that more diverse establishments are less likely to see successful organizing attempts. Little evidence is found, however, that this is because workers are less interested in voting for unions. Instead, the organizers of more diverse units are more likely to give up before such elections are held,” the study found. Why? The employees were more likely to blame racial injustice for unfair work practices rather than realizing that the entire workforce as a whole was facing injustice.

DEI Text

Whole Foods created a heat map to track the risk of unionization and compiled data from the National Labor Relations Board. The company looked at “external risks,” “store risks,” and “team member sentiment.” Stores in closer proximity to other unions had a higher rate of external risks, as did stores with a higher percentage of families living under the poverty line in the store’s respective zip code.

Union Strike r

Store risks showed a direct correlation between diversity and unionization:

“Store-risk metrics include average store compensation, average total store sales, and a “diversity index” that represents the racial and ethnic diversity of every storeStores at higher risk of unionizing have lower diversity and lower employee compensation, as well as higher total store sales and higher rates of workers’ compensation claims, according to the documents.”

Team member sentiment was also adversely affected by diversity. Once again, employees were more likely to feel that management was singling out people based on race than believe that management had implemented unfair practices against the collective workforce.

Amazon, the parent company of Whole Foods, has been combating unionization efforts for years. Both companies promote DEI initiatives and tout high scores on the Human Rights Campaign’s CEI scoring. In truth, they spent money to learn how to weaken the power of their workforce.

At a higher level, we see these same divisive practices from world leaders who hone in on our differences to diminish the power of united citizens. This is why we see woke policies, DEI hiring, and an increased insistence that we defend our individual identities that we were never at risk of abandoning. It is why they want us to feel confused in our own skin, the reason they ask children in elementary school to choose their pronouns and sexuality. This is why the slavery reparations argument resurfaces every few months and why they want to impose late-term abortion in the Bible Belt rather than allowing individual states to decide. Everyone is focused on defending their identity based on race, religion, etc., rather than realizing that those at the top effectively turned neighbor against neighbor.

Marriott Sues Franchisee for Profiting on Migrant Crisis


Posted originally on Aug 14, 2024 By Martin Armstrong |  

Migrants.ObamavAdams

Some were led to believe that the hotels offering shelter to migrants were on some philanthropic mission. Quite the contrary as these hotels were paid by their respective Sanctuary Cities with taxpayer funds. Marriott International is now suing one of its franchisees for breaching their contract by collaborating with New York City to turn the hotel into a migrant shelter.

The Aloft and Element hotel in the Jamaica neighborhood of Queens managed to fill every room in its establishment after partnering with New York City. The franchisee, Pride Hotel LLC, failed to notify Marriott that it was converting its establishment. The average room was prices at $156 per night but some reports state the city paid up to $300 per night. Marriott claims that the “lucrative contract” resulted in “significant harm” to the establishment and is seeking $2.6 million in damages.

2024_02_04_19_57_40_Illegal_Immigrants_in_New_York_to_Get_Pre_Paid_Debit_Cards_in_53_Million_Progra

American taxpayers funded the migrant shelters. The media misled the public into believing that big businesses simply made room out of the goodness of their hearts to house these illegal persons. Yet, New York City spent an estimated $4.88 billion in taxpayer funds throughout the past few years on illegals, with up to $2 billion being spent on migrant shelters. About 80% of the shelters, 153 of the 193 in the Big Apple, were hosted by hotels.

We leave our veterans and homeless on the streets to rot. These Sanctuary Cities have spent untold amounts on promoting open border policies and question why their city budgets are imploding. Absolutely nothing has been done to curb the migrant crisis in New York City and we should only expect the situation to worsen if the open border candidate remains in power.

Now a Registered Lobbyist for Ukraine, Kellyanne Conway Will No Longer Work with Trump Campaign


Posted originally on the CTH on August 13, 2024 | Sundance 

Last week we found out that Kellyanne Conway, a rather disingenuous woman with deep professional republican bona fides, had registered under FARA laws so that she could lobby the US Government on behalf of Ukraine.   Essentially, Kellyanne Conway is a Ukraine lobbyist.

The MSM tried to push a story that people around President Trump were positioning Conway for a more substantive role in the Trump campaign.  However, President Trump put a stop to that false narrative by telling everyone there was ZERO truth to such a claim.

VIA MSM – Donald Trump denied a report that he might be looking to bring back his former campaign manager Kellyanne Conway who served as a senior counselor to the former president.

Speculation that Conway could again take on a prominent role in his campaign grew after Tara Palmeri reported in the online magazine, Puck, that some of the former president’s family members are pushing for her return.

[…] Trump denied the report in an interview with The New York Times Friday, confirming he was not making any changes to his campaign team and that he was “thrilled” with his top advisers, Susie Wiles and Chris LaCivita. (Read More)

.

Beyond Orwell


Posted originally on the CTH on August 12, 2024 | Sundance

Mass formation psychosis.

Remember when the Australians were putting people into forced quarantine camps for failing to take vaccinations?  Remember when the New Zealanders were arrested for going on a subversive trip to McDonalds and violating their containment zones?  Remember when Americans were arrested for going to playgrounds or parks?  Remember when EU citizens were arrested for not carrying their vaccine passports?

Well… If you remember those examples that factually happened, then you can likely see how this is just another part of the continuum.  WATCH:

.

There is no such thing as “misinformation” or “disinformation“, there is only information.

You were not born with a brain requiring you to believe everything you are told. You were born with a brain that allows you to process information and formulate opinions using discernment.

There is only INFORMATION. The variables within the information you receive are accuracy or inaccuracy; truth or lies.

~Sundance

UK Govt Arresting Citizens over Mean Tweets


Posted originally on Aug 12, 2024 By Martin Armstrong |  

The UK government is in a state of panic as its citizens continue to protest for immigration reforms. When governments are in a panic, and threats cease to hold weight, they look to silence dissent. UK authorities have resorted to jailing hundreds of citizens for speaking against the government’s agenda on social media.

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer claims that this witch hunt is intended to sniff out anyone who could potentially incite hate speech. You do not need to commit a crime to be arrested. The director of public prosecutions of England and Wales, Stephen Parkinson, said that authorities are “scouring” social media to hunt down citizens. “We do have dedicated police officers who are scouring social media. Their job is to look for this material and then follow up with identification, arrests, and so forth, “ he proclaimed. Retweeting or liking a post can be deemed an imprisonable offense.

Police officers are raiding homes and forcibly removing citizens based on their social media usage. As a reminder, the final straw was the murders of three innocent little girls who were stabbed to death during a dance class. There has been a massive rise in crime, especially against women and girls, but the authorities have done NOTHING to protect their own citizens from the unvetted migrants living a taxpayer-subsidized life.

Britain has done this discreetly over the years. Over 5,000 people were arrested for speaking their mind online between 2008 and 2017. The Communications Act of 2003 permits the authorities to arrest someone over offensive or menacing messages via electronic communications. Section 127 defines how electronic communications could be used illegally in an extremely broad way. Anything deemed “grossly offensive, indecent, obscene, or menacing” is grounds for an arrest. This also gives the government the ability to search citizen’s private text messages for anything that could offend the status quo.

The messaging does not need to be threatening. There are reports of people being imprisoned for simply sharing the wrong identity of the child murderer or questioning UK immigration policies.

The World Economic Forum has successfully penetrated the highest offices in your government and your elected officials are no longer there to serve you or their nation. Your government hates you and has deliberately imported millions of undocumented migrants to destroy your culture.

Did the WEF force Harley Davidson to go Woke?


Posted originally on Aug 12, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

Harley Davidson_sign_in_Wootton_ _geograph.org_.uk_ _1372894

It seemed like a blatantly poor business decision for American motorcycle manufacturer Harley Davidson to go woke. After all, the company is associated with conservative values and masculinity. The company installed CEO Jochen Zeitz who represents everything the brand’s core base is against – climate change, trans care for kids, DEI efforts, and other woke policies.

Now I should mention that Blackrock owned an 8% share in Harley Davidson, the fund that has forced businesses to comply with “woke social scores” to secure funding. After installing Zeitz, the company suddenly partnered with United Way and the Human Rights Campaign. The CEI (Corporate Equality Index) was created by the HRC (Human Rights Campaign), a massive international political lobbying group that pushes the woke agenda aggressively and is funded by Soros. The CEI judges a company’s woke rating, while the ESG encompasses everything.

CEI.WokeRating

These companies are not trying to appease the LGBTQ+ community; they’re trying to appease BlackRock so that they can maintain high social credit scores and maintain funding. And who is Blackrock trying to appease? The World Economic Forum, where current CEO Jochen Zeitz was once employed. He took it upon himself to fund “The B Team” which aims to force businesses to adopt social policies.

“Plan A—where business has been motivated primarily by profit—is no longer an option. We knew this when we came together in 2013. United in the belief that the private sector can, and must, redefine both its responsibilities and its own terms of success, we imagined a ‘Plan B’ – for concerted, positive action to ensure business becomes a driving force for social, environmental, and economic benefit. We are focused on driving action to achieve this vision by starting ‘at home’ in our own companies, taking collective action to scale systemic solutions and using our voice where we can make a difference.”

Shareholders certainly do not care about business being motivated by anything other than profit. Blackrock and others have tried to move away from the disastrous CEI score but something behind the curtain is forcing these companies to comply. The B Team is working toward Agenda 2030, which seems foolish to align a fossil-fuel driven company with climate initiatives.

There is an ulterior motive that is forcing these companies to go woke, but what is the alternative? We see what has happened with Budweiser, Target, Starbucks, John Deere, the list goes on. Now, Harley owners are selling their bikes and vowing never to buy from the company again. Employees at the company are being forced to undergo DEI training and take classes to become an LGBTQ ally. But the company is now appeasing the WEF and Blackrock with its Human Rights Campaign social CEI score of 90.

Is this Election Going to All Fake Photos?


Posted originally on Aug 11, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

Harris Photoshopped Crowd R

Is anything real anymore? This photo appears to be Photoshopped, for when you look at the reflection on the underbelly of the plane and on the engine, you do not see the crowd. The polls will be rigged just as they were in 2016 and in London for BREXIT. The press is no more trustworthy than a career liar. This is why Socrates correctly forecasted both the 2016 election and BREXIT when the polls all claimed that Hillary would win and BREXIT would not pass. Newsweek had even sent out their edition assuming Hillary would win.

Newsweek Madam President Hillary Clinton R

Politico Reports They Have Received Hacked Documents from Inside the Trump Campaign for 19 Days


Posted originally on the CTH on August 10, 2024 | Sundance 

Noticing the outlet with the story is always the first step in identifying the motive behind it.

Together with the New York Times, Politico is the most favored outlet by the FBI, DOJ and domestic IC apparatus.  [DHS stories go through The Wall Street Journal, CIA through The Washington Post, and State Dept through CNN.  These are the constants in an ever-changing narrative universe.]

According to a recent Politico article, on July 22nd they began receiving leaked documents from the account of a “senior official” within the Trump campaign.  [Datapoint – That is a total of 19 days ago]

The Trump campaign said the documents were “hacked” likely as an outcome of a foreign actor, intending to influence the 2024 election.  Actually, that’s a pretty smart move by the Trump campaign. I’ll explain why.

Politico – […]  “These documents were obtained illegally from foreign sources hostile to the United States, intended to interfere with the 2024 election and sow chaos throughout our Democratic process,” Cheung said. “On Friday, a new report from Microsoft found that Iranian hackers broke into the account of a ‘high ranking official’ on the U.S. presidential campaign in June 2024, which coincides with the close timing of President Trump’s selection of a vice-presidential nominee.”

On July 22, POLITICO began receiving emails from an anonymous account. Over the course of the past few weeks, the person — who used an AOL email account and identified themselves only as “Robert” — relayed what appeared to be internal communications from a senior Trump campaign official. A research dossier the campaign had apparently done on Trump’s running mate, Ohio Sen. JD Vance, which was dated Feb. 23, was included in the documents. The documents are authentic, according to two people familiar with them and granted anonymity to describe internal communications. One of the people described the dossier as a preliminary version of Vance’s vetting file.

The research dossier was a 271-page document based on publicly available information about Vance’s past record and statements, with some — such as his past criticisms of Trump — identified in the document as “POTENTIAL VULNERABILITIES.” The person also sent part of a research document about Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, who was also a finalist for the vice-presidential nomination.

The person said they had a “variety of documents from [Trump’s] legal and court documents to internal campaign discussions.”

Asked how they obtained the documents, the person responded: “I suggest you don’t be curious about where I got them from. Any answer to this question, will compromise me and also legally restricts you from publishing them.” (more)

By saying the documents were hacked; against the backdrop of a potential “phishing operation,” what the Trump campaign is framing is a duplicate example of exactly what happened to Jon Podesta and Hillary Clinton’s campaign in 2016.  The scenario is identical.

Politico is told by Trump officials they are holding “foreign originated” “hacked documents” from a “senior official inside the Trump campaign.”  This is the exact scenario that Politico and the aligned media railed against on behalf of Hillary Clinton in 2016.  Now, however, the same Politico is running to the typeset to share what they previously said was illegal to report and share.

They’ve got nothing.  But keep watching.

It is very safe to assume the intelligence officials inside the Biden administration are conducting full domestic surveillance operations of the Trump campaign using every tool in their toolbox.  Including full NSA captured metadata programs, electronic, phone and physical surveillance.

Politico reporting contact with hacked material is simply someone from within the U.S. Government, likely domestic IC (FBI), pretending to be a hacker to transmit surveillance material to their media allies.

Comrade Suspicious Cat remains, well, suspicious.

Tucker Carlson Interviews Geoff Shepard About “Six Ways from Sunday Crowd” Targeting President Nixon


Posted originally on the CTH on August 10, 2024 | Sundance 

Tucker Carlson has been talking for a while now, about the parallels/similarities of how the CIA and Intelligence Community targeted Richard Nixon and how the same group targets Donald Trump almost 50 years later.

In this interview with Geoff Shepard, Tucker Carlson discusses, “newly unearthed documents showing Watergate was a scam from start to finish.” Geoff Shepard saw it happen walks through the story with Carlson.  Geoff Shepard’s documentary, “Watergate Secrets and Betrayals,” is available at the link here: https://watergatesecret.com WATCH:

Chapters:

  • 0:00 Intro
  • 0:51 Who Is Geoff Shepard?
  • 2:22 What Was Watergate?
  • 12:07 The CIA’s Involvement in Watergate
  • 20:13 The Break-in
  • 38:11 Unanswered Questions About the Break-in
  • 49:10 The Core Criminals of Watergate
  • 53:03 The Smoking Gun Tapes
  • 56:14 The Press’s Role in Watergate
  • 1:11:39 Political Persecution of Richard Nixon
  • 1:40:17 Hillary Clinton’s Role in Watergate
  • 1:47:05 The Similarities to Donald Trump
  • 1:57:22 What Did Nixon Think of All This?
  • 2:14:57 Did Nixon Believe the Election Was Stolen?

The 17th Amendment


Posted originally on the CTH on August 9, 2024 | Sundance

Machiavelli said“It must be remembered that there is nothing more difficult to plan, more doubtful of success, nor more dangerous to manage than a new system. For the initiator has the enmity of all who would profit by the preservation of the old institution and merely lukewarm defenders in those who gain by the new ones.”  A prescient and oft repeated quote that is pertinent to the situation.

When our founders created the system of government for our constitutional republic, they built in layers of protection from federal control over the lives of people in the states.  Over time those protections have been eroded as the federal bureaucracy has seized power.  One of the biggest changes that led to the creation of the permanent political class was the 17th amendment.

Our founders created a system where Senators were appointed by the state legislatures.  In this original system the senate was bound by obligation to look out for the best interests of their specific states.  Under the ‘advise and consent‘ rules of Senate confirmation for executive branch appointments, the intent was to ensure the presidential appointee -who would now carry out regulatory activity- would not undermine the independent position of the states.

The nucleus of corruption amid every element of the federal institutions of government is the United States Senate.   The U.S. Senate, also known as the “upper chamber,” is the single most powerful elected element in modern federal government.

The Intelligence Branch is the most powerful branch of government.  However, the U.S. Senate is the most powerful assembly of federally elected officials.  We pretend the IC branch doesn’t exist; that’s part of our problem.  At least we admit the Senate exists.

All other elected federal corruption is dependent on a corrupt and ineffective Senate.  If we correct the problems with the Senate and reconnect the representation within the chamber to the state-level legislative bodies, we will then see immediate change.  However, there would be ZERO institutional allies in this effort.

When the 17th amendment (direct voting for Senators) took the place of state appointments, the perspective of ‘advise and consent’ changed.  The senate was now in the position of ensuring the presidential appointee did not undermine the power of the permanent bureaucracy, which is the root of power for the upper-chamber.

Senate committees, Homeland Security, Judiciary, Intelligence, Armed Services, Foreign Relations, etc. now consists of members who carry an imbalanced level of power within government.  The senate now controls who will be in charge of executive branch agencies like the DOJ, DHS, FBI, CIA, ODNI, DoD, State Dept and NSA, from the position of their own power and control in Washington DC.

In essence, the 17th amendment flipped the intent of the constitution from protecting the individual states to protecting the federal government.

Almost every source of federal issue: ex. spending, intervention and foreign assistance, conflict with the states, burdensome regulation, surveillance and spying on American citizens, the two-tiered justice system and the erosion of liberty & individual rights (see COVID examples), can be sourced back to the problem created by the 17th amendment.

Because of the scale of their power, the Senate will not give up control easily; and every institution of society and government will actively work to block/stop We The People from taking back control of the upper chamber.  Every entity from Wall Street to multinational corporations, big tech, banks, foreign governments and world organizations would align against us.   When you truly understand the epicenter of the corruption, then you are able to see the tentacles extending from it.

It would be easy to say “repeal the 17th amendment;“ it is ‘another kettle of fish’ entirely to walk through the process to make that happen.  Yes, ultimately, we do need a full repeal of the 17th amendment and return the selection of the senators from each state with a nomination and appointment process within the state legislature.  [Common Explainer Here]

Seventeenth Amendment- “The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, elected by the people thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote. The electors in each State shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the State legislatures.

When vacancies happen in the representation of any State in the Senate, the executive authority of such State shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies: Provided, That the legislature of any State may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct.” (link)

Prior to the 17th amendment, there was significant state level corruption as business interests and senate candidates worked in power groups with party officials to attain the position.  Politicians seeking Senate seats began campaigning for state legislative candidates in order to assemble support.

The state legislative races then became a process of influence amid powerful interests seeking to support their Senate candidate.   Get the right people in the State legislature and you can get the Senator appointed.

Those state-level entities, bankers, wealthy people of influence, later became the permanent K-Street lobbying groups once the 17th amendment was ratified. In essence, they just shifted the location of their influence operation from the state to an office in Washington DC.   [Those same power groups, albeit much larger, now write the physical legislation we see in congress.]  Additionally, prior to the 17th amendment, there were issues of vacancies in federal senate seats as state legislatures could not agree on an individual Senator.

The biggest issue following the passage of the 17th amendment became Senators who were no longer representing the interests of their state.  Instead, they were representing the interests of the power elite groups who were helping them fund the mechanisms of their re-election efforts.

A Senator only needs to run for re-election every six years.  The 17th amendment is the only amendment that changed the structure of the congress as it was written by the founders.

Over time, the Senate chamber itself began using their advice and consent authority to control the executive and judicial branch.  The origination of a nomination now holds the question: “Can this person pass the Senate confirmation process?”  The Senate now abuses this power to ensure no one challenges them.  Additionally, the Senate began using their oversight capacity to control elements within the executive branch and judicial branch.   The full scope of that issue in modern form is OUTLINED HERE – which is the cornerstone of the Intelligence Branch of Government.

If we can repeal the 17th amendment and return the selection to the state legislature, you can see where the background work of Tactical Civics and Extreme Federalism begin to take on importance.   [NOTE: Within the repeal effort we would need to include a recall process for states to reach out and yank back their Senator if they go astray; the ability to recall was missing in the original construct of the framers; it would need to be added.]

◊ PATH ONE is the primary platform of the presidential candidate…. a visible and emphasized mandate that includes: “vote me into office and you are voting to repeal the 17th amendment “.  This specific election issue would need to be the #1 priority of the candidate and spoken at every event.

This approach gives presidential candidate Donald Trump the mandate to demand congress to act if he won the 2024 election.  We need a warrior of epic strength, resolve and fortitude. We need Donald Trump.

◊ PATH TWO is the parallel path built along with the 2024 election platform path and put into place in the event that Congress refused to accept the mandate.

Obviously, this would be an ugly battle.   The second path is a convention of states in the first year of President Trump’s second term in office.

The ‘convention of states‘ would be detailed, strategically planned, and the future schedule determined during the 2024 GOP convention preceding the November election (assuming the right candidate wins).   That way, if congress refuses to act on their own, within say the first 100 days of the new administration, the state legislatures will then assemble a convention for the singular and limited purpose of one action item: “repeal the 17th amendment “.  That’s it. Full Stop.  Nothing more. Nothing else entertained.

There is a lot more to this, and a lot more to cover in discussion of this.  However, this is the path that can resolve most of the issues we face with an out-of-control federal government.   The shift in power would kneecap the Intelligence Branch of Government by re-instituting genuine oversight and control. A repeal of the 17th amendment stops Senators from campaigning, needing to raise money and puts them directly into the accountability position as a steward for the interests of their state.

The people within each state would then have a mechanism to address any negative federal action by contacting their state legislative representative.  In a worst-case scenario, a rogue Senator could be removed within days if they support any federal legislative activity that is not in alignment with the state interest.  This approach also wipes out most of the power amid the Senate Majority Leader, as he/she could also be recalled by the state and would be less likely to work against the interests of the majority in the chamber.

The House of Representatives was created to be the voice of the people, ie, “The Peoples’ House.”  However, the U.S. Senate was structurally created to be the place where state government had representation in the federal government decision-making.  The 17th amendment completely removed state representation, and we have been in an escalating battle over state’s rights ever since.

Overlay that DC structural issue with the fact that almost all of the bureaucracy created by this skewed DC system is now in place to defend itself from any outside effort to change it, and you get this UniParty problem that Donald Trump fully exposed.

Repeal the 17th amendment and we would see the most significant restoration of freedom, liberty and social balance in our lifetime.