Weekly Jobless Claims Add Another 2.1 Million, Revised First Quarter GDP -5%…


The Dept. of Labor released weekly unemployment data showing an additional 2.1 million workers filed new unemployment compensation claims last week; bringing the total claims to over 40 million since the Wuhan virus mitigation effort shut down the U.S. economy.

However, there is some good news within the data.   The “continuing claims”, meaning those who have been collecting unemployment compensation for at least two weeks, is now at 21 million.  That’s a drop of almost four million from the prior week and signals that jobs are returning as the state economies begin reopening.

Additionally, the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) released the second estimate of the first quarter Gross Domestic Product.  The estimate moved the prior contraction of -4.8 percent slightly lower to a newly revised estimate of -5.0 percent.

With the first quarter at -5.0 percent (Jan, Feb, March) and a guaranteed much larger contraction in the second quarter (April, May, June) it is now a certainty we will officially be labeled “in a recession” when the Q2 numbers are released on the last Friday of July.  The media is using the data lag to narrate, and drag-out discussion of negative economic news, as long as possible.

There are some indicators the rebound will be strong (home sales, housing starts, mortgage applications, consumer confidence) but the key to both a wide and deep recovery is putting people back to work as quickly as possible.

(CNBC) First-time claims for unemployment benefits totaled 2.1 million last week, the lowest total since the coronavirus crisis began though indicative that a historically high number of Americans remain separated from their jobs.

Economists surveyed by Dow Jones had been looking for 2.05 million. The total represented a decrease of 323,000 from the previous week’s upwardly revised 2.438 million.  (read more)

Videos on Bill Gates and his Handmaiden Dr. Anthony Fauci and Their Plan to Reduce the Word’s Population that Google doesn’t want You to See!


Bill Gates was a ruthless businessman and used any means legal or not to achieve his goal. Ho he accomplished that is not the story here but the bottom line was after he retired he created a 501(c)(3)  Foundation, The Bill & Melisa Gates Foundation twenty years ago in 2000. The stated goal was the created an illusion that this foundation was created to help the poor and destitute of the world, nothing could be further from the truth. The foundation started off with $46.8 billion and Gates started giving large grants to implement his stated goals.

No one knows exactly how much money Gates gave away but it was, without doubt, tens of billions of dollars over the past 20 years. Gates made sure the world knew what he was doing through his extensive publicity efforts. However strangely the latest financial records of the foundation indicates that it’s assets are probably worth over $100 billion today. So it would seem that Gates was doing more than giving away grant money. So what was his real purpose of this foundation?

Initially his focus seemed to be on Climate change and how it was imperative that we stop using carbon based fuels that were creating Carbon Dioxide (CO2) and that was causing the temperature of the planet to increase and that that increasing temperature would in the near future destroy civilization itself.  Gates was not alone in this believe as Al Gore the former President Clinton VP was also on board with this idea. I became aware of this is a famous TED talk where Gates indicated that that to get to zero emissions of Carbon Dioxide production my humans would have to go to zero. Later it became obvious that this college drop out was not educated as he was being influence by those that followed the dis bunked theory of Tomas Malthus found in his 1798 book An Essay on the Principle of Population, Which basically stated that the growth of the population would out strip the ability to feed it and that would create famine and war. 222 years later, today, we know that was not true.  But Gates apparently does think it is true and it seems that his REAL GOAL is to significantly reduce the world’s population.

The following bits of videos will show that Gate and Fauci (a hired hand of Gates) probably created this COVID-19 pandemic in Wuhan China and hid its release in China and the World Health organization until it had spread world wide. This two both need to be tried for Crimes against Humanity for example from a NIH 2005 study, that found that “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” Fauci has been rejecting the use of this and has been preaching the Gates vaccine solution. The report stated:

“We report, however, that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-COV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage. In addition to the well-known functions of chloroquine such as elevations of endosomal pH, the drug appears to interfere with terminal glycosylation of the cellular receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. This may negatively influence the virus-receptor binding and abrogate the infection, with further ramifications by the elevation of vesicular pH, resulting in the inhibition of infection and spread of SARS CoV at clinically admissible concentrations.

 

Conclusion

Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS COV in cell culture. Favorable inhibition of virus spread was observed when the cells were either treated with chloroquine prior to or after SARS COV infection. In addition, the indirect immunofluorescence assay described herein represents a simple and rapid method for screening SARS-COV antiviral compounds.”

Error
This video doesn’t exist

Newsom Continues to Bully the Church Despite President’s Directive


David Martin image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesMay 28, 2020

Newsom Continues to Bully the Church Despite President's Directive

L.A., California—In an attempt to continue state surveillance of churches because of COVID-19, Governor Newsom of California has all but ignored President Trump’s directive to allow churches to reopen without interference from the state.

At a press briefing on May 22, the president made it clear that governors and state officials were given until the weekend to lay off the churches by allowing them to reopen without restrictions and regulations.

“I call upon governors to allow our churches and places of worship to open right now,” the president said. “If they don’t do it I will override the governors.”

The president said nothing about allowing continued restrictions but ardently defended religious groups that are demanding a full return of their religious practice in church. “The people are demanding to go to church and synagogue,” he said. “Many millions of Americans embrace worship as an essential part of life.”

Fake Compliance

While feigning compliance to Trump’s directive by merely allowing churches to crack their doors open, Governor Newsom,  in league with the California Department of Public Health,  issued a ruling on May 25 stating that churches “must therefore limit attendance to 25% of building capacity or a maximum of 100 attendees, whichever is lower.

So, the Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels in Los Angeles that accommodates 3,000 people must now limit attendance to 100 people, or a church that seats 100 people can only allow 25 people to come and worship. If this isn’t unveiled discrimination against religion, what is!

Here the liquor stores, supermarkets, and pizza parlors are brimming over with activity with virtually no restrictions imposed while the church is being oppressed and put in the doghouse because Newsom and state bureaucrats want to make fun of religion.

The president indicated that basic common sense measures to adopt such as social distancing and use of face masks should be up to the churches to decide for themselves, but Newsom and state officials have set themselves up as political deities to impose their own set of socialist ‘commandments’ on the people.

Key prevention practices being imposed on houses of worship by the governor include:

  • Physical distancing to the maximum extent possible
  • Use of face coverings by employees, volunteers, and congregants/visitors
  • Frequent hand washing and regular cleaning and disinfection
  • Training employees and volunteers on these and other elements of the states COVID-19 prevention plan

Moreover, the state’s new guidelines strongly recommend “discontinuing singing, group recitation (e.g. the Rosary after Mass), and other practices and performances” and that churches “modify practices such as limiting the number of people reciting or singing, ensuring physical distancing greater than six feet between people.”

The state furthermore advises “modifying practices that are specific to particular traditions” which include “discontinuing kissing of ritual objects [relics]” and “offering Communion in the hand instead of on the tongue.”

Heinous Violation

The state has no right making such recommendations or imposing juridical rules, as they are blasphemous and violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, i.e. Separation of Church and State, which prevents the state from interfering with the church. The governor’s ruling is loaded with regulation and constitutes a gross intrusion upon the church—something President Trump did not ask for.

The state ruling says that “This limitation will be in effect for the first 21-days of a county health department’s approval of religious services” after which “the California Department of Public Health, in consultation with county Departments of Public Health, will review and assess the impact of these imposed limits and provide further direction.”

This conceivably could mean that the state could tighten up on its surveillance of churches or even close churches if state officials deem that the first 21 days weren’t effective enough in stopping the spread of COVID-19.

At the May 22 briefing, Trump told states to get off the churches’ backs, but instead the State of California is bombarding churches with rules and recommendations, which if heeded, would scarcely give the faithful a moment to focus on their religious duties. Their attention would now be taken up with a whole new set of rules as if a new state religion had come along to replace that of Christ.

We can only hope that President Trump will double down on his May 22 statement by making it the law of the land that states from henceforth are prohibited from imposing rules and regulations on churches. This would not only restore our freedom of worship but would gain him more votes from the people and many more blessings from above!

Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 6 – Last in Series)


There is much left to address concerning SARS-CoV-2, best seen clear in the rearview mirror

Lee Cary image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesMay 27, 2020

Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both?What do you see in the picture above? Is it the eye of a rabbit looking right, or a bird turned left? Or, both? The same is asked when looking at the SARS-CoV-2 ordeal.

Review of Part 5 Takeaways

  • Conventional wisdom among the Scientific Community—a first cousin of the “Intelligence Community” – never took HCQ seriously as a contender for the role of interim mitigator of virus symptoms until a proven vaccine comes along.
  • Proponents of HCQ, regardless of some very impressive résumés, are treated as kooks by the established science experts.
  • The chief scientist of the World Health Organization recently announced the suspension of HCQ trials because they’re too dangerous, WHO says.

Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 6)
Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 5)
Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 4)
Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 3)
Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 2)
Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both? (Part 1)

Marshaling an army of “Contact Tracers”

The Grand Re-opening of America may be accompanied by one or more efforts to marshal large groups of contact tracers, tasked to map a new wave of virus victims. Several such efforts are being discussed.

One by-product of the home quarantine of “non-essential” persons, regardless of age, could be the hunt for fresh victims in a second wave of infections. Herd immunity was never given the chance to be established.

The Scientific Community anticipates a new wave of virus victims coming after the nation opens up to normalcy. Some suggest The New Normal will require diligent monitoring of the population, with no end in sight.  And, their thinking is, such monitoring is best done by those trained to trace people with whom the newly infected are/were in contact.  Hence, contact tracing.

On April 18, Bill Clinton and Andrew Cuomo talked contact tracing in the context of a virtual gathering of the Clinton Global Initiative University.

Let’s listen in on their unrehearsed discussion concerning contact tracing, relying on the C-SPAN transcript of the 40 min. video:

Cuomo: (24:19) “We need tracing agents in the hundreds and hundreds of people. You take a trace test – you take a test and then trace back the contact. This has never been done on this scale. This is an army of investigator and tracers, we will do that the best we can with this seven-state consortium, but it could have been done from the federal government on a tighter and more efficient {sic}.” (Cuomo listed six of the seven in northeastern state “consortium”: New Jersey, New York, Massachusetts, Delaware, Rhode Island, and Connecticut.)

Clinton: (24:50) “I agree with you on this, this contact tracing is very important, and it could have enabled our entire country to have a real public health system, a real public health corps (indiscernible) could we make this a part of the current treatment? Is there some other way we could do it?  I’m worried (indiscernible) that they’re trying to get a state contact tracing core, you have to get bodies in there, and they have to be safe while they are tracing.  You cannot just show up in your jeans and t-shirts.  You have to really know what you are doing when you are going into these neighborhoods and trying to run these needs down. Do you think maybe you could get the governors to ask congress to fund that? Or maybe we can spend some of the money, but we need a national core of healthy people who are trying to go out and do contact tracing. We need bodies.”

Partners in Health (PIH) is already engaged with one state in Cuomo’s consortium.  As of May 12:

“Partners in Health was recently selected by Massachusetts governor Charlie Baker to conduct Coronavirus ‘contact tracing,’ a process that involves teams of investigators finding out who infected people have come into contact with. The group is already ‘training and deploying hundreds of contact tracers.’ Some citizens fear the potential for mass surveillance posed by contact tracing, especially in light of a Democrat-introduced bill in Congress to authorize contact tracing ‘at individuals’ residences.’ Partners In Health’s involvement will not assuage many fears, considering the group has received funding from George Soros and Bill Gates organizations and counts Chelsea Clinton on its board of trustees.

PIH’s 2017 Form 990, posted on Guidestar.com, reported their annual revenue as $127,157,823.

On May 1, in conjunction with the move toward contact tracking, 45 House Democrats, led by Rep. Bobby Rush (IL, 1st Dis.), proposed HR 6666, entitled “Covid-19 Testing, Reaching, and Contacting Everyone (TRACE) Act.” The Bill was referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

HR 6666’s stated purpose is: “To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to award grants to eligible entities to conduct diagnostic testing for COVID–19, and related activities such as contact tracing, through mobile health units and, as necessary, at individuals’ residences, and for other purposes.”

The Bill, a short read, is found here. It suggests $100,000,000,000 (not a typo) funding for fiscal year 2020; and, of course, “such sums as may be necessary for each of fiscal year 2021 and any subsequent fiscal year during which the emergency period continues.”

A population under observation needs immunity documentation

Politico.com announced, on April 10, that:

“Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, revealed Friday the federal government is considering issuing Americans certificates of immunity from the coronavirus, as the Trump administration works to better identify those who have been infected and restart the U.S. economy in the coming weeks. ‘You know, that’s possible,’ Fauci told CNN’s ‘New Day,’ when asked whether he could imagine a time when people across the country carry such forms of identification.”

“‘I mean, it’s one of those things that we talk about when we want to make sure that we know who ‘the vulnerable people are and not,’ he said. ‘This is something that’s being discussed. I think it might actually have some merit, under certain circumstances.’” (bolding added)

In a related comment noted by NPR, Dr. Robert Redfield, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC), said:

“People are looking at all the different modern technology that could be brought to bear to make contact tracing more efficient and effective. Are there more, if you will, say, tech savvy ways to be more comprehensive in contact tracing versus the old-fashioned way? You know, currently, these things are under aggressive evaluation.”

How far and how deep might this future medical surveillance go?

On May 12, Dr. Anthony Fauci dropped a hint when testifying before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions in a hearing about reopening America. He said:

“There’s no guarantee that the vaccine is actually going to be effective.”

Think of that comment as the bookend of an earlier one Fauci made at the Georgetown University Medical Center just a few days before the Inauguration of Trump. Fauci’s speech was titled “Pandemic Preparedness in the Next Administration.” He said:

“There is no question that there will be a challenge to the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases.”

“No question?” None? How did he know that for sure?

Series Conclusion

There is much left to address concerning SARS-CoV-2, best seen clear in the rearview mirror. For example:

  • How did the reactions of Blue and Red state governors vary?
  • How did America’s religious organizations react when the Government closed them?
  • What can we say about the role of the print, internet, televised, and social media?
  • Is there a “new normal” ahead, and what is it?
  • What is the impact on public and private schools, of all ages?
  • What happens the next time there’s a virus event?
  • Was any traditional American freedom sacrificed never to return?
  • How did the nation view the leadership of Donald J. Trump?
  • And critical for geopolitical issues: Why and How did the virus originate?

Regarding the question in the series’ title – “Pandemic, Plandemic, or Both” – that’s for you to answer.

If you’re willing, go to this site’s comment board and write what you think.

This remains, despite all, a free country.

Twitter—The Big Lie Of Our Time


Meanwhile, If anyone should be “fact checked” or censored, it should be Twitter.

Judi McLeod image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesMay 27, 2020

Twitter—The Big Lie Of Our Time
You can get away with calling on wing-nuts with specifics on a lethal way to murder the president of the United States on Twitter as deranged comedian Kathy Griffin just did—but will be flagged by Twitter ‘fact checkers’ for posting tweets that call mail-in ballots “fraudulent” and predicting that “mail boxes will be robbed” if you’re President Donald Trump.

“Comedian and perennial Trump antagonist Kathy Griffin is advocating for the physical assault of the president, tweeting that she wants someone to stab the commander in chief with a “syringe with nothing but air inside” — a potentially lethal act if it creates an embolism. (Breitbart, May 27, 2020)

Physically threatening?

Physically threatening?  How about calling to the cause someone who would kill or assassinate the president?

“Physically threatening the president of the United States is a federal offense. Physical threats also constitute a violation of Twitter’s terms of service that can result in permanently getting kicked off the platform. (Breitbart, May 27, 2020)

“We will immediately and permanently suspend any account found to be posting violent threats,” the social media giant says on its official site.”

Oh, yeah? Then how come Griffin’s Tuesday Tweet with a most descriptive means to take down the President of the U.S. is still riding high on Twitter Wednesday morning?

“For the first time, Twitter has flagged some of President Donald Trump’s tweets with a fact-check warning. ( Yahoo, May 27, 2020)

“On Tuesday, Twitter added a warning phrase to two Trump tweets that called mail-in ballots “fraudulent” and predicted that “mail boxes will be robbed,” among other things. Under the tweets, there is now a link reading “Get the facts about mail-in ballots” that guides users to a Twitter “moments” page with fact checks and news stories about Trump’s unsubstantiated claims.

If Twitter calls Trump’s claims on the legality of mail-in-ballots. “unsubstantiated” then they must be “unsubstantiated”.

“Until now, the president has simply blown past Twitter’s half-hearted attempts to enforce rules intended to promote civility and “healthy” conversation on its most prominent user. Trump frequently amplifies misinformation, spreads abuse and uses his pulpit to personally attack private citizens and public figures alike — all forbidden under Twitter’s official rules. (Yahoo)

In a statement, Twitter said Trump’s vote-by-mail tweets “contain potentially misleading information about voting processes and have been labeled to provide additional context around mail-in ballots.”

“Over the weekend, the president issued several tweets calling into question the legality of mail-in-ballots. The storm of tweets followed Facebook and Twitter posts from Trump last week that wrongly claimed Michigan’s secretary of state mailed ballots to 7.7 million registered voters. Trump later deleted the tweet and posted an edited version that still threatened to hold up federal funds. (Breitbart, May 27, 2020)

“Twitter policy forbids sharing “false or misleading information intended to intimidate or dissuade people from participating in an election or other civic process.” While it has previously flagged tweets, it has never before put warnings on tweets for any other reason.

“Trump replied on Twitter, accusing the platform of “interfering in the 2020 Presidential Election” and insisting that “as president, I will not allow this to happen.”

“His 2020 campaign manager Brad Parscale said Twitter’s “clear political bias” had led the campaign to pull “all our advertising from Twitter months ago.”

Twitter says in its terms of service that “you may not threaten violence against an individual or a group of people. We also prohibit the glorification of violence.”  The company said it defines violent threats as “statements of an intent to kill or inflict serious physical harm on a specific person or group of people.” (Breitbart)

“Federal law states that individuals who physically threaten the president can face up to five years in prison.

That’s the latest political Twitter antics in the U.S.

 
Trudeau Foundation Annual Report (page 37) 2018-2019

“Twitter Canada is listed as a sponsor in the Trudeau Foundation Annual Report…now we know why anything “Trudeau Bad” doesn’t stay on the viewable trending list for long. #CDNpoli. (Twitter)

That proves more than anything else that Twitter’s not just the social media platform for people to deposit their cute, humorous or even vitriolic, evil little messages—but a massive political force in action.

Meanwhile, If anyone should be “fact checked” or censored, it should be Twitter.

Exposing the Hoaxes Killing America


The New American Video

Linda Goudsmit image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesMay 27, 2020

In this interview with The New American’s Alex Newman, author and political analyst Linda Goudsmit outlines some of the pseudo-humanitarian hoaxes that have been used by world-government advocates to undermine American freedom on the road to a New World Order.

When Are Doctors Considered Incompetent?


How many politicians you have sought out for medical advice?

Tony Mangan image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesMay 27, 2020

When Are Doctors Considered Incompetent?

Doctors become incompetent when they disagree with a politician. When I see an interview of some governor who is charged with the wellbeing of his constituents and should be shepherding them to safety and prosperity, I see that the convenience of the Corona virus has allowed governors, some mayors, and even council critters to become junior Mussolinis.  They conduct all of their oppressive behavior based on what, according to them, the scientific community recommends. That’s all they need to proclaim before the media gets behind them and prints their story supporting the oppressor. Ask the media for details and they will begin to wriggle and squirm and stutter something about the scientific community.

This “Plandemic” seems to be the ideal vehicle of convenience for the politician to spew a multitude of lies and flaccid excuses as to why nothing bad that happens is their fault and everything that they do is in accordance with scientific approval.

Stay in your house; you must wear a mask in public; your children must be kept indoors; you must stay a minimum of six feet away from another person. The virus can be spread by phone—a technical truth, provided a non-infected person picks up that phone right after an infected person hangs it up.

Frankly, when it comes to my health, that of my family or even my dog, I do not want a politician involved, for as sure as there is ice in The Arctic—if it is of no value to him personally—he’ll let you die. And if it is to his advantage for you to die, you would be wise to make your final arrangements. Ask Governor Cuomo.

If there is any doubt in your mind, just tell me how many politicians you have sought out for medical advice, or any advice for that matter, that they didn’t send you to some member of their staff to handle the matter.  Yet, they want to dictate to their fellow citizens during a “pandemic.”  I don’t think I would ever consider trusting a politician to instruct me on how to successfully strike a match.

Hong Kong – The Matchstick to War?


The US-China tensions over Hong Kong are boiling over. The US government is reportedly considering imposing sanctions on Chinese firms and officials over China’s new national security laws for Hong Kong, which have already re-ignited anti-Beijing protests in the city.

The UK government has also raised concerns over Chinese state TV reporting on the new measures, and Hong Kong residents seeking to circumvent the “great firewall” are downloading privacy-protecting VPNs at a record pace. Meanwhile, China’s President Xi Jinping is calling on the country to prepare for military conflict.

The primary deterrent to war is ECONOMICS. This coronavirus scam has crashed the global economy. With the prospect of reduced trade, recession in China will escalate and this will only create anti-West feelings and will further the trend toward war.

Hong Kong’s greatest security was economics. Now that the coronavirus is being used to kill the economy to further climate change and socialism, we are cascading faster and faster into a very dark future that we will all need to address.

Families Dividing over the Virus


COMMENT: Mr Armstrong:
I had to write to tell you that you are absolutely right about two things in particular I have now seen one presented so thoroughly one sided I could not believe what I was reading. I was reading one of the blogs where they were condemning the so called climate change deniers by pointing out that the historical record going back more than 500 million years clearly showed that it was all carbon dioxide related. I was fascinated by something you keep driving home, they were focused entirely on CO2. I dislike being involved where I can see people have no brains and I asked one question with many parts, What about the cycles of sun as an influence?, what about the nitrogen, Oxygen, Argon, Neon, Helium, Nitrous Oxide, Ozone, Methane? Further what about the earth itself, the moon cycles, the solar winds? These people all think it is really only one influence. We are doomed if these people are in charge. There response was the did not matter because the there was no reliable indicator of the temperature of the sun, to which I asked what about the rest?

They responded that they do not count. Excuse me but about 95% of the atmosphere is water vapor. What about that? No reply. Another thing I find very fascinating and maybe I am not looking hard enough. When I was in high school there was a course called earth science, that is where I learned how broad the determining factors of the climate and weather are. What I find interesting is I cannot find any high school teaching the course any longer? Do you know why?

My final observation is that you are correct more than you know the propaganda behind this respiratory virus is causing rifts in families, it is happening in my own, my brother is a scientist and he goes on and on telling me how this is going to result in 100s of thousands of deaths. I keep arguing with him no. He does not talk to me any longer even though I have been sending him things that are intended to only help him with his research. He even told me Hydroxychloroquinine does not work when combined with Zinc and antibiotics, To which I reminded him that our father whom was a doctor and had a great background in chemistry, zoology and biology told us many times that zinc can stop colds or lessen the impact and if we could find a way to get the zinc into the cell of someone already sick we could shorten the virus dramatically. To which he tells me I am wrong.

In any event what you warned is actually happening. Sad and true at the same time.
Thanks for everything that you do by bringing facts to the table not fantasy.

F

REPLY: I find it very interesting how the climate change people ignore all the evidence and have substituted pollution for the power to change the climate. We are heading into a solar minimum and instead they claim this is now caused by CO2. Nobody in the media dares to even question them. They report their allegations as conclusive facts. Greta blamed the Australian drought on climate change, yet droughts have taken place in Australia for hundreds of years.

The splitting of families over this virus issue is troubling, but it is also NORMAL. The very same splits emerged in Britain over Brexit. It has created major divides in families over left and right politics to the point where they are no longer speaking. It will also take place between the parents and their children. The thinking process will simply divide a family very rapidly and the exploitation of this virus is having a profound social restructuring.

Another reader wrote to express a similar result of the lockdown: “I know so many people who are struggling with politics these days, but in my family, it’s gotten downright very bad and unpleasant. I think my family is in trouble over everything that’s happening in this country, even in the world. We can’t seem to have a family gathering without some kind of big blow-up.”

Some people see the problems completely differently and expect the government to be capable of saving the day. But political differences are becoming a more heated topic than religion ever was. Since, for better or worse, political decisions have a huge impact on our lives and there are those who just prefer to blame others for their own problems. This seems to be really a major generational shift as well, and unfortunately, it is part of the process as we move toward 2032. It is the underlying cause of civil unrest in such times of uncertainty.

Gates’ Eugenics End Goal – Population Control


What is truly amazing is how the mainstream media is so intent upon just accepting whatever Bill Gates says and his entire agenda without the slightest bit of investigation. They just hate Trump so intensely that they do not care what the agenda is behind Gates’ global assault on the economy, arguing we will never be safe 100% without his vaccine, and his insistence of vaccinating the entire world.

None of the mainstream media seem to even think this is a wild agenda. All they have to do is look at Gates’ father and his elitist view of eugenics which drove him to be the head of Planned Parenthood. Why will nobody in the media even look into the subject? Do they assume they are one of the chosen few that are in the elite class with Gates? Do they not care that the entire eugenics movement of the Progressive Era was outright racist?

The American Eugenics Society (AES) was one of the leading theories of the Progressive Movement which emerged out of socialism at the turn of the 20th century. It was founded by the famed eugenicist and conservationist Madison Grant (1865-1937), who was an American lawyer, writer, and zoologist. Madison Grant’s book, The Passing of the Great Race, was devoted to an attempt to give the meaning of history through his view of race. Grant looked at civilization by race, not politics or language. He argued that European ethnic groups such as the Alpine and Nordic races were superior. This book was first published in 1916, and it formed the foundation of the American Eugenics Society of which Bill Gates Sr was a member.

Grant was joined by other leading thinkers and activists of the Progressive Era which included Harry H. Laughlin (1880-1943), who was an American educator, eugenicist, and sociologist, Henry Crampton (1875-1956), who was an American evolutionary biologist and malacologist (branch of invertebrate zoology), Irving Fisher (1867-1947), who was the famous American economist who declared the stock market reached a new plateau in 1929 before the crash. Fisher was a very active Progressive social campaigner. There was also Henry F. Osborn (1857-1935) who was an American paleontologist and geologist.

It was Osborn who articulated the entire Progressive Movement with its subset of eugenics based on conservationism which saw that reducing population would further civilization and that those who were poor were really holding back society. This was the common view of the time being put forth by the elite, that namely heredity is superior to influences from the environment. Nobody could be educated in reality, it was all heredity. Therefore, Osborn expressed the view of the AES that distinct races existed with fixed hereditary traits. He concluded that the Nordic or Anglo-Saxon “race” was the highest. Osborn supported eugenics to preserve “good” racial stock which is why he endorsed Grant’s book writing both the second and fourth prefaces for him.

The AES described eugenics as the study of improving the genetic composition of humans through the controlled reproduction of different races and classes of people. This elitist end-goal remains that of Bill Gates despite the fact he will not come out publicly and state that he is focusing on India and Africa for this group has long viewed them as the bottom of race within society. This is why he is so obsessed with population control.

It was Gates to called together a group of Billionaires to sell his concerns about reducing the population in 2009. While we know that was the topic, nobody wants to talk about details. This entire Coronavirus scam is part of his end-goal to control the population. It was even Gates who has funded remote control birth-control by implanting chips into women. Then Gates will be able to turn on and off births according to whatever criteria he desires like a TV with remote control. That will lead to only one place – required permission and permits to even have children.

Given Gates’ father’s involvement in Planned Parenthood and a member of eugenics, you would think someone would investigate. Add Gates’ push to then eliminate all paper money to be able to tag everyone on the planet and control the entire world economy through his ID efforts, you would think this is the plot of a James Bond megalomaniac villain. Microsoft even just announced on January 9, 2020, their Microsoft Identity solutions project. Gates resigned from the board of Microsoft allegedly only to try to distance himself for PR purposes.

The US Supreme Court actually upheld their eugenics views in Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927), where the United States Supreme Court, written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., actually ruled that a state statute permitting compulsory sterilization of the unfit, including the intellectually disabled, “for the protection and health of the state” did not violate the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The Supreme Court actually wrote: “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” The Supreme Court has never expressly overturned Buck v. Bell. This was the precise theory behind the Nazi movement to adopt eugenics terminating all disabled people and later moved to ethnic cleansing.

Interestingly, before the revelation of the death camps of the Nazis was finally exposed in July 1944 where they were carrying out the mass murder of millions of European Jews, Gypsies, the intellectually disabled, physically disabled veterans, dissidents, and homosexuals between 1933 and 1945, eugenics was an acceptable theory. Only after what the Nazis were doing was the word eugenics swapped for population control.

The Supreme Court ruled on eugenics once again in Skinner v. State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Williamson, 316 U.S. 535 (1942). Here, the United States Supreme Court ruled that held that laws permitting the compulsory sterilization of criminals were unconstitutional if the sterilization law treats similar crimes differently. In this case, the Oklahoma law applied to “habitual criminals” but it did exclude white-collar crimes. That could have applied to even traffic tickets which are a crime. The Court held that treating similar crimes differently violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.

The AES was renamed the Society for the Study of Social Biology in 1972. Whether Bill Gates is targeting Africa and India paying bribes to corrupt politicians to carry out his vaccinations is another topic just ignored by mainstream media. To them, Bill Gates walks on water. Is Gates target what his father regarded as the lowest races on earth, or is that where he could just bribe his way into the governments to use their population for his grand plan? Nobody will even raise the question in mainstream media. The real question is how long will it take for the people to rise up against their own corrupt politicians now trying to take what Gates has done in Africa and India and impose it by decree in America and Europe?