Green New Deal: Climate change is just another name for social justice, which is just another name for wealth redistribution and totalitarianism

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By Jack Dini —— Bio and Archives—December 10, 2020

n a major speech in Jakarta in February 2014, John Kerry claimed that “climate change can now be considered another weapon of mass destruction, perhaps the world’s most fearsome weapon of mass destruction.”  ¹

Kerry recently commented on Covid-19: “It’s a tragically teachable moment. I don’t say this in a partisan way. But the parallels between COVID-19 and climate change are screaming at us, both positive and negative. You could just as easily replace the words climate change with COVID-19; it is truly the tale of two pandemics deferred, denied, and distorted, one with catastrophic consequences, the other with even greater risk if we don’t reverse course. The long-term parallels between this pandemic and tomorrow’s gathering storm of climate crisis are more clear. If the economic devastation of the coronavirus pandemic is costly today, the cost of climate inaction will match—if not exceed—our current expenditures, which is why the next administration must act with urgency on day one.” ²

Now he will be in in a position to work the issues of ‘climate pandemic’ and ‘mass destruction.’

Kerry, a former secretary of state, senator and Democratic presidential nominee, will lead the country’s reentry into global climate politics in a new role that will elevate climate change as a priority of President-elect Joe Biden.  ³

Kerry ‘will fight climate change full-time as Special Presidential Envoy for Climate,’ according to a statement by Biden’s transition team. “America will soon have a government that treats the climate crisis as the urgent national security threat it is,” Kerry tweeted after the announcement.

Kerry, a long time Biden ally who turns 77 next month, said that he intends to use his new post to tackle the world’s most pressing environmental problem.
“The work we began with the Paris Agreement is far from done,” he said. “I’m returning to government to get America back on track to address the biggest challenge of this generation and those that will follow. The climate crisis demands nothing less than all hands on deck.”

Yet, Kerry has admitted at the 2015 Paris climate conference that US emissions cuts would not change the climate, but he hailed the agreement as one of his proudest moments.  “The fact is that even if every single American citizen biked to work, carpooled to school, used only solar panels to power their homes, if we each planted a dozen trees—if we somehow eliminated all of our domestic gas emissions—guess what? That still wouldn’t be enough too offset the carbon pollution coming from the rest of the world. If all the industrialized nations went down to zero emissions—remember what I just said—all the industrial nations went down to zero emissions, it wouldn’t be enough—not when more than 65 percent of the world’s carbon pollution comes from the developing world.”  ⁴

Just recently in addressing the G20, President Trump stated that the Paris agreement ‘was not designed to save the environment. It was designed to kill the America economy.’ It looks like Kerry agrees with Trump’s assessment of the effect of the Paris agreement on climate. Given Kerry’s anti-American history, President Trump’s entire assessment of the Paris climate agreement is likely correct. ⁵

Some other Kerry history:

• Kerry, along with Barbara Boxer, pushed for climate change legislation in the Senate. This bill, the proposed Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act (S.1733), designed to severely restrict greenhouse gas emissions, would have placed an enormous burden on American families—higher gasoline prices, higher heating costs, higher energy taxes, and higher unemployment. ⁶ The Kerry-Boxer Bill didn’t pass, But that hasn’t slowed Kerry’s crusade against global warming.
• Kerry said that air conditioners and refrigerators are as big a threat to life as the threat of terrorism posed by groups like the Islamic State. ⁷
• In a keynote address to the Global Table Food and Agriculture Conference, Kerry made veiled swipes at the Australian government’s lack of climate and energy policy. “We just can’t sit on our asses and leave the political process to neanderthals who don’t believe in the future.” ⁸
• He raved in a Washington Post op-ed about the following:
  • CO2 made Boko Haram kidnap hundreds of innocent girls
  • CO2 is causing Norfolk Naval station to sink
  • Debating CO2 will kill US soldiers ⁹

Kerry recently said,  “America will soon have a government that treats the climate crisis as the urgent national security threat it is. I’m proud to partner with the President-elect, our allies, and the young leaders of the climate movement to take on this crisis as the President’s Climate Envoy.” ¹⁰

And what are the views of the young leaders? Green New Deal proponent Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s chief of staff Saikat Chakrabarti admitted recently that the true motivation behind the Green New Deal is to overhaul the ‘entire economy.’ “Do you guys think of it as a climate thing? Because we really think of it as how do you change the entire economy thing,” he said. ¹¹

Green New Deal: Climate change is just another name for social justice, which is just another name for wealth redistribution and totalitarianism

The Green New Deal is recognition from the most devoted environmentalists that climate change is just another name for social justice, which is just another name for wealth redistribution and totalitarianism—a dictatorship. ¹²

Exit polling from the 2020 election shows that the climate issue was simply not a voter priority anywhere. The high mark for climate seems to have been Colorado where 9% of voters said climate was their priority. But in states such as Florida, Texas, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and even Biden’s Delaware, a mere 3% of voters said climate was their priority.  ¹³

Clearly, this is a message Kerry will ignore. 

References

1. Myron Ebell, “Secretary of State John Kerry explains the greenhouse effect,” globalwarming.org, September 16, 2014
2. Marc Morano, “Biden taps John Kerry as Presidential climate envoy—expect merging of Covid & climate—Kerry: ‘You could just as easily replace the words climate change with Covid-19’” , climatedepot.com, November 23, 2020
3. Brady Dennis et al., “Biden names John Kerry as presidential climate envoy,” washingtonpost.com, November 23, 2020
4. Steve Milloy, “At the 2015 Paris climate conference, John Kerry admitted US emissions cuts were pointless,” November 23, 2020
5. Steve Milloy, “JunkScience.com statement on Biden selection of John Kerry as Climate Envoy,’ junkscience.com, November 23, 2020
6. David Kreutzer et al., “What Boxer-Kerry will cost the economy,” Heritage Foundation #2365, January 26, 2010
7. Joanne Nova, “John Kerry: air conditioner, fridge gas, as a big threat as ISIS,” joannenova.au.com, July 24, 2016
8. Lisa Martin, “John Kerry says we can’t leave climate emergency to ‘neanderthals’ in power,” amp.theguardian.com, September 3, 2019
9. John Kerry, “Disband your climate denial panel, Mr. President,” washingtonpost.com, February 25, 2019
10. John Kerry, Twitter, November 23, 2020
11. Jack Crowe, “AOC’s chief of staff admits the green new deal is not about climate change,” nationaireview.com, July 12, 2019
12. Hayden Ludwig, “The green road to serfdom,” capital research.org, December 24, 2019
13. Steve Milloy, “One clear election loser: the green new deal,” msn.com, November 7, 2020

Armstrong Economics Blog/Canada Re-Posted Dec 11, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

COMMENT: SERIOUSLY WE WILL BE LABELED AS TIN FOIL HAT NUTS NOT TO TAKE THE SHOT
AND IF YOU OWN A BUSINESS WILL YOU BE SHUT DOWN BECAUSE ITS A PUBLIC PLACE!
I KNOW RESTAURANT OWNERS.

CK

REPLY: There is little doubt that the career politicians have gotten together and decided that since they cannot continue to borrow indefinitely with these artificial interest rates, the scheme is to change the entire economy and usurp Capitalism to transform it into a Feudalistic Socialistic system. In Ontario, they are threatening business owners by saying they cannot operate anymore without receiving a vaccination. This entire situation is getting out of hand.

Once the population reaches 40% with their eyes open, that is when things start to become more of a revolution. It all depends on the people, and they are counting on the people being sheep. But that will not last forever. But they have successfully brainwashed the younger generation into leftist agendas. When they see that they will lose their freedom, then they will start to question what has taken place.

Armstrong Economics Blog/Economics Re-Posted Dec 11, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

Klaus Schwab, who is trying to take over the world with his Stakeholder Economics & Fedualist-Socialism, has suddenly realized that his efforts to destroy capitalism as we know it is also undermining his precious World Economic Forum (WEF), which has been forced to start to slash its workforce. Since Europe has followed his recommendations, his Fourth Industrial Revolution gathering can no longer be held in Davos or on the Bürgenstock, and he has been forced to move it to Singapore because of the coronavirus crisis he has helped to exploit.

I warned at our World Economic Conference, which we had the largest audience in our history opposite of Schwab, that these people think they can destroy the world economy and “build back better” by redirecting how the economy should work from their elitist position as overlords. Schwab’s “Great Reset” is also impacting his WEF. The pandemic is forcing layoffs at the WEF — something that will benefit humanity! It allegedly seems to be Edleman who has come up with this marketing plan they are all following.

It has been a major turning point for Schwab and his WEF, which has been used to only success and countries pouring money into his coffers. The World Economic Forum has cut around 9% of its jobs in recent months and it seems to be entering a crash mode itself into 2022. That is good news for the rest of us.

The WEF is not cheap. The membership fees range from 60,000 to 600,000 francs per year ($67,337- $673,370). Tickets for participation in the WEF cost extra: around 25,000 francs each ($28,061). In return, the business elites have access to a platform that brings them together with heads of state, scientists, and Hollywood stars. Without these people showing up, Schwab will have no attendance. Our cocktail event at our World Economic Conferences is famous for networking where people meet everyone from around the globe.

Re-Posted from GrrrGraphics.com DEC 9, 2020 AT 10:38 AM Bang Bang with Fang Fang

Suspected of being a long-term spy for Communist China, Christine Fang, aka, ‘Fang Fang’ expended a lot of time and energy as she weaved her way into American politics. Her job was to collect personal information on politicians. She would help fundraise for her assignments, which included those in Congress as well as prominent mayors. One mayor couldn’t understand why Fang Fang would have sex with him and was told she did it to help ‘improve her English.’

She was definitely entangled with Swalwell until Federal authorities warned him about her suspected spying for the Chicoms. He then disassociated himself from her and she quickly beat a path out of the country—presumably back to China.

This matter only underlines the hypocrisy of Swalwell. He got on a high horse and claimed Trump was in the pocket of Putin, when in reality Xi was attempting to pocket the callow and corruptible Swalwell.

We know many Democrats have been swayed and influenced by the Chinese communist party. The nationalist Trump put an end to China’s hopes for a while, but if ‘China Joe’ does manage to make the cheating stick and captures the White House, look for the Chicoms to one again have more say over what happens in our country. Too many Democrats such as Biden have been all too willing to sell out their office to the highest bidder.

—Ben Garrison

19 State Attorneys General or five legal experts will end up with egg on their faces when the Supreme Court rules on Texas’s motion

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By David Singer —— Bio and Archives—December 10, 2020

he Supreme Court has now ordered Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin to respond to Texas’s motion to file a complaint against them regarding their States’ conduct of the 2020 elections by 3 p.m. Thursday, December 10.

President Trump has indicated he will seek leave to intervene in the case whilst Attorneys General for Arkansas, Alabama, Missouri, and Louisiana have issued statements in support of Texas’s action.

Related: 18 States Join Texas In General Election Supreme Court Lawsuit Against 4 Swing States

The Texas filing was initially met with scorn and derision by: 

Rick Hasen – an election law expert and professor at the University of California:

 “the dumbest case I’ve ever seen filed on an emergency basis at the Supreme Court. This is a press release masquerading as a lawsuit,”

CBS News’ election law expert – David Becker:

“Calling this garbage might be generous.”

Steve Vladeck – a professor at the University of Texas’s School of Law:

“dangerous, offensive and wasteful. It looks like we have a new leader in the ‘craziest lawsuit filed to purportedly challenge the election’ category,”

 Texas appellate lawyer Raffi Melkonian:  

“it doesn’t make any sense and is bad and has no chance of success at all. Just want to be clear on that”

Eugene Mazo from the Louis D. Brandeis School of Law: 

“This is the dumbest case any lawyer has ever seen, and the Supreme Court won’t touch it. Really, this is the craziest case of them all. Unbelievable

Texas claims that:

• Pennsylvania’s Secretary of State, Kathy Boockvar, without legislative approval, unilaterally abrogated several Pennsylvania statutes requiring signature verification for absentee or mail-in ballots. Pennsylvania’s legislature has not ratified these changes, and the legislation did not include a severability clause.
• Georgia’s Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, without legislative approval, unilaterally abrogated Georgia’s statute governing the signature verification process for absentee ballots.
• Michigan’s Secretary of State, Jocelyn Benson, without legislative approval, unilaterally abrogated Michigan election statutes related to absentee ballot applications and signature verification. Michigan’s legislature has not ratified these changes, and its election laws do not include a severability clause.
• Wisconsin Elections Commission and other local officials unconstitutionally modified Wisconsin election laws—each time taking steps that weakened, or did away with, established security procedures put in place by the Wisconsin legislature to ensure absentee ballot integrity.

Texas has argued:

• The Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2, of the Constitution makes clear that only the legislatures of the States are permitted to determine the rules for appointing presidential electors. 
• Non-legislative actors lack authority to amend or nullify election statutes. Bush II, 531 U.S. at 104. 
• The actions taken by the above officials constitute non-legislative changes to State election law by executive-branch State election officials, or by judicial officials in violation of the Electors Clause. 
• Electors appointed to Electoral College in violation of the Electors Clause cannot cast constitutionally valid votes for the office of President.

Texas has further argued:

• The Equal Protection Clause prohibits the use of differential standards in the treatment and tabulation of ballots within a State. Bush II, 531 U.S. at 107. 136. The one-person, one-vote principle requires counting valid votes and not counting invalid votes. Reynolds, 377 U.S. at 554-55; Bush II, 531 U.S. at 103 (“the votes eligible for inclusion in the certification are the votes meeting the properly established legal requirements”).
• The actions taken by the above officials created differential voting standards in violation of the Equal Protection Clause and violated the one-person, one-vote principle. 

The constitutional issues raised directly affect the 2020 election results.  

19 State Attorneys General or five legal experts will end up with egg on their faces when the Supreme Court rules on Texas’s motion. 

Armstrong Economics Blog/Disease Re-Posted Dec 10, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

I warned the objective with these lockdowns is to crush the economy so they can “build [it] back better,” which means they must destroy the economy as we know it. They will continue to extend these lockdowns throughout 2021 and use them as the excuse to end democracy and elections 2021-2022. The lockdown which was just for a few weeks was extended to include Christmas and New Years’ and it will constantly be extended to achieve their political goals. They are already hinting at extending them into March in Europe.

Blog/Disease

Posted Dec 10, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

I warned the objective with these lockdowns is to crush the economy so they can “build [it] back better,” which means they must destroy the economy as we know it. They will continue to extend these lockdowns throughout 2021 and use them as the excuse to end democracy and elections 2021-2022. The lockdown which was just for a few weeks was extended to include Christmas and New Years’ and it will constantly be extended to achieve their political goals. They are already hinting at extending them into March in Europe.Video Player00:1500:55

To “build back better” by bringing CO2 to zero, they will continue the lockdowns despite the fact that after one year, CO2 has not declined. Gates has used his money to back this agenda to drive CO2 to zero and reduce the population. They are targeting cows and want to end meat production. Bill Gates, with Leonardo DiCaprio, has already has been building that industry in anticipation of claiming animals can get COVID and must be exterminated — i.e. 17 million Minks. They are claiming your pets can now get COVID and the CDC says they must be confined to the house. What’s next? We must kill all our dogs and cats? Make no mistake about it, they would do the same with people if they could get away with it.

This is no different from Karl Marx and his entire idea of redesigning the world economy by confiscating all wealth and making all decisions from the central political authority. Marx was also all about shutting down religion — the opium of the masses.