Inflation the Real Story


Posted originally on May 10, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

3 faces of Inflation Dragon

QUESTION: Mr. Armstrong, a friend of mine attends your conferences and said you’re the only person who understands the economy because you have international experience and have met with many central banks around the world. He said inflation is no longer the simplistic expansion of the money supply, and anyone who said that is still trapped by Keynesian economics. If inflation is not the quantity of money anymore, then can you explain what inflation is all about? Why have you not appeared on Tucker Carlson to explain your theory?

I appreciate your patience.

Rob

Quantity Theory of Money QTM 1

ANSWER: The people who put out this theory have ZERO international experience.

CURRENCY INFLATION:

Currency inflation can take place in primarily two ways. First, the currency declines in value, and this attracts foreign capital to rush in for bargains. I did that myself when the British pound fell to $1.03 in 1985. It was like the country on sale at Harrods.

Secondly, let’s say you have a building in it, and I buy it for $10 million. The money supply is not altered. However, let’s say I’m British and I buy your building in the United States. I have to bring British pounds, convert them into dollars, and then pay you your $10 million. I have just increased the domestic money supply and assets, and the central bank had no impact.

CapitalFlow1919 1940

Here are the capital flows during the Great Depression. You see a massive exit of capital in 1931, which was caused by the Sovereign Debt Defaults of 1931, as all of Europe, including Britain and the British Commonwealth, such as Canada, suspended their debt payments. That is what took down 9,000 banks, not tariffs.

JapanCapitalFlow M1987

Here are the capital flows for the 1987 Crash, which was also caused by capital outflows. Even looking at the 1989 Japanese Bubble, what made it similar to the 1929 bubble in the USA? Capital inflows and concentration from around the world cause the assets to rise, and money pours into the economy. Currently, Canada has seen a 300% rise in real estate, largely due to foreign capital flowing into the country.

1994 1998 Asian Currency Crisis

After the 1989 Bubble in Japan, capital then shifted to Southeast Asia. Thailand’s assets soared, both in real estate and stocks. Then it crashed in 1997, as capital was then expected to be the next hot market in 1999. Here you see Thailand’s peak and the US market rose into July 1998. Thailand then passed real estate legislation, which prohibited foreigners from owning land. Foreigners generally cannot own land outright in Thailand, even since the 1997 Asian Currency Crisis. However, exceptions exist for significant investments (e.g., a 2022 cabinet-approved proposal allowing land purchase with a 40 million baht investment in specified sectors, subject to parliamentary processes). This aims to stimulate the economy rather than restrict access.

Foreigners may own up to 49% of the total unit area in a condominium project, provided the funds are imported from abroad, which increases the money supply. Foreigners can lease property for up to 30 years in the classic British system, with potential renewals, although this does not confer ownership – only the right to use. While setting up a Thai company (majority Thai-owned) to hold land is a common workaround, authorities actively scrutinize such arrangements to prevent misuse.

Recent discussions (2022–2023) focused on easing restrictions for high-value investors rather than imposing bans. Thus, Thailand maintains its historical framework: it restricts land ownership but permits certain property investments under regulated conditions. Always consult legal experts for current, case-specific advice. All of this was a response to the 1997 Asian Crisis caused by capital concentration, and then it moved on to the next hot topic.

Gold 1982 1991 Basket

Here, you can see that the price of gold varies by currency, all based on its value. Are you genuinely looking at a chart of gold, or are you only looking at it in relation to the local currency?

1927 Secret Banking g4

DEMAND INFLATION:

This was Keynes’ misconception, who assumed the bull market up to 1929 was purely driven by domestic demand. He proposed raising interest rates to make borrowing more costly and lowering interest rates to encourage borrowing. The idea was seriously myopic. He did not understand capital flows, and that higher interest rates sometimes attract capital, as was the case when Volcker raised interest rates to insane levels in 1981, which sent the dollar soaring to a record high in 1985.

DowIntRates 1927 1932

Lowering rates in 1927 to try to deflect the capital inflows back to Europe failed. The Fed raised rates from 3.5% to 6%, and it did not stop the rally in the share market. The Fed then lowered rates from 6% to 1,5% in 1931, and it had no impact on supporting the market. So, again, all we have are failed theories, yet people lacking international experience mouth the same old stuff over and over again because everyone else does.

Assets v Money

ASSET INFLATION:

Then you have raw shortages or oversupply. The purchasing value of gold dropped significantly thanks to the 1849 California Gold Rush. During inflation, assets rise in value, and money declines. That took place during the 19th century when a gold coin was money. MONEY has NEVER been of a constant value – NEVER! These people yelling fiat simply do not comprehend that for thousands of years, there has always been a business cycle, and that means money rises and falls in purchasing power, REGARDLESS of whatever it has been. The fiscal irresponsibility of governments is well-documented throughout history, long before the introduction of paper money.

Wholesale Price Inflation Gold Fluctuated
Taylor Bayard 1825 %E2%80%93 1878

Even under a gold standard, there were periods of inflation and deflation. Read the history of the California Gold Rush. During the 1849 Gold Rush in California, the journalist for the New York Tribune, Bayard Taylor (1825-1878), arrived in San Francisco by ship during the summer of 1849. He was shocked at what he encountered and did not think that anyone would even believe what he was going to write. His dispatches about the gold rush economy in California stunned many and helped to create the 1849 Gold Rush.

The average wage for a laborer in New York was about one or two dollars a day. In California, individual hotel rooms were rented to professional gamblers for upwards of $10,000 a month, which is the equivalent of about $300,000 today. The degree of inflation in terms of gold was astounding and lacks comparison in modern times. There was so much gold that the value of goods rose even though they did not in New York. The inflation phenomenon was local – akin to the Tulip Bubble.

Inflation Deflation

There is a lot more to this than simply the quantity of money. In case you haven’t noticed, some Marxist economists who propose MMT (Modern Monetary Theory) claim that since the U.S. borrows in its own currency, it can print dollars to cover its obligations and can’t go broke. The theory has won converts among freshman Democrats, like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, as a way to finance social policies like the Green New Deal and Medicare for All. They pointed to the vast Quantitative Easing (QE) in 2008-2009, and inflation was not created. The European Central Bank expanded the money supply and lowered interest rates to negative in 2014, despite no inflation.

confused

Quantitative Easing (QE) does not increase the Supply of Money—it is only a maturity swap. Today’s total money supply includes debt, unlike during the pre-19th century. This has erroneously given rise to Modern Monetary Theory, for they pointed to QE and said there was no inflation, so that we could print without repercussions. It was merely a swap of maturities when you finally realized that debt is now money that earns interest, as paper money was introduced during the Civil War.

186410CompoundInt 2

When paper money stopped paying interest, the term “Greenback” emerged, meaning there was no interest payment schedule on the reverse, just green ink. Paper money began as essentially debt or bonds that circulated as a form of cash. Today, people blame the central bank, but remain clueless that the money created by the central bank is only a tiny fraction of the money supply. Because debt issued after 1971 is now legal to use as collateral, posting T-Bills to trade futures, the $34 trillion debt is part of the money supply that dwarfs the central bank. Shutting down the Federal Reserve will make things worse. The real source of inflation under this theory of the Quantity Theory of Inflation is the debt itself.

Moreover, we pay interest, and that no longer stimulates the economy because much of it is held offshore. China has 10% of the US debt, which accounts for 10% of the $1 trillion in interest payments that flow to China, not the domestic economy.

Fed dollar QTM production

If your Definition of Money is Wrong, So is Everything Else that Follows

As far as Tucker is concerned, I haven’t been invited, and I’m not sure he would want someone who doesn’t agree with 99% of the analysts on this subject.

And by the way, this is not theory – it’s plain experience and observation.

QTM

Capital Flow & Flight to Quality?


Posted originally on Apr 24, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Flight to Quality

QUESTION: A recent analysis by Allianz economists claimed that, ordinarily, when yields on Treasuries rise, the U.S. dollar strengthens as foreign capital pursues those higher yields. However, the dollar weakened as yields rose. They said that in this instance, it “suggests major holders were not only selling Treasuries but also converting the proceeds into currencies – possibly reallocating to European markets.”

This does not seem to be correct. It looks like an opinion. Could you comment on this, please?

Thank You

Greg

Capital Flow Map M 4 24 25

ANSWER: I think a lot of people fail to appreciate the stark difference between the US markets and Europe. The NYSE is worth MORE in total capitalization than all of Europe COMBINED! The US consumer spending on a bad day is still 25% of global consumer spending. Europe accounts for $1.20 out of every $10 spent. Europe CANNOT be a reservoir for big capital. It is so socialistic, it is a joke. We invented capital flow analysis, and we have the actual data.

1927 Secret Banking g4

This idea is not original about interest rates and capital flows. This is the typical academic theory they still teach in schools today. In 1927, that was the FIRST G4 meeting where Britain, France, and Germany petitioned the NY Fed to lower interest rates in hopes that that would send capital back to Europe. When they did that, it CONFIRMED that there was a debt crisis, and even more money poured into the USA.

DowIntRates 1927 1932

The Fed cut rates in the US to help Europe, and the markets continued to rise as capital flows into the US intensified. The money was pouring into the US equities, and the Dow more than doubled as the Federal Reserve raised rates from 3.5% to 6%.

Chin Holdings US Debt Q 4 24 25

China has been reducing its holdings of US debt ever since the 2014 Ukrainian War began and the Biden Administration threatened China with sanctions if it helped Russia. This is what I have spoken about the BRICS is all about: geopolitical theater, not economics. China saw removing Russia from SWIFT as using the world financial system as a geopolitical tool. The Biden Administration was run by the Neocons, who do not care about the people or the economy, only their myopic desire to destroy Russia.

This is why FOX News or any mainstream news organization would NEVER invite me because I rain on their parade. This is all about feeding people the narrative they agree with. This is never about news.

Just the Facts

BLOOMBERG

Bloomberg has crossed to the dark side of propaganda; They are more concerned about hating Trump than they are about reporting just the facts, ma’am. They reported:

“The rotation by investors out of American assets will go on for years if President Donald Trump persists with his global trade war.”

“The Trump administration has arguably opened the door for the country’s financial dominance to be challenged, with the dollar and Treasury bonds losing appeal in what may be a dire shift of fortunes for America. US equities also have been underperforming global peers this year amid fear that Trump’s strategy of tariff chicken will damage growth and stoke inflation.”

1932 The Evening Journal Wilmington Delaware • Tariffs c aused depression

This is all based on the Democrats’ propaganda during the 1932 presidential election. As I have said, there is no serious economist I have ever heard blame the Great Depression on the tariffs, which did not come into effect until June 1930, and they were a response to Europeans raising taxes 33 times after World War I.

By the way, Japan and China have also been dumping European Debt. With Europe pushing for World War III, you have to be insane to buy European debt. European shares hold the risk of capital controls, and you will not get your money out when the first bullet is fired.

UK FTSE market closed 1915 1918

So, people are selling US shares and debt and moving to Europe as a safe haven? They must be the same people who are still driving alone in their car with a mask on to feel safe.

Exit Tax

What Trump Does Not Understand About Trade


Posted originally on Apr 15, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

World Economy 1

The United States has about 330 million people, and one in every $3 spent in world trade is by American Consumers. Europe has 450 million people, but it still clings to Marxism, is highly regulated, and is very anti-entrepreneurial. Trump fails to grasp here that trade wars will NOT even the score. The global consumer market seems to be ignored. As I have explained, the Current Account, which people call the trade account, also includes all interest and dividends on stocks, bonds, and investments. In theory, if China bought 100% of the US national debt, then the perceived trade deficit from interest of $1 trillion would flow to China, and this has nothing to do with jobs or manufacturing anything.

German Assets

Let’s clarify trade. The United States has the largest economy in the world, so it’s the top contributor to global consumer spending. China would be next, followed by countries like Japan, Germany, the UK, India, and so on. Note that China is already the #2 consumer-based economy. Europe is far too Marxist, and it still clings to the old theories of Mercantilism. The average German has less net wealth than an Italian, yet they are the biggest economy.

In recent years, the global GDP has been around $100 trillion. Depending on the economy, consumer spending typically makes up about 60-70% of a country’s GDP. So, if we take 65% of $100 trillion, that’s about $65 trillion in global consumer spending annually in theory. Now, breaking this down by country. The US GDP is around $25 trillion. If US consumer spending is about 68% of GDP, that would be roughly $17 trillion. Therefore, the US share would be 17/65, approximately 26%. That means we have a US consumption-driven economy.

China’s GDP is around $18 trillion. However, consumer spending as a percentage of GDP is lower, maybe around 40%, because their economy is more investment—and export-driven. So 40% of $18 trillion is $7.2 trillion. That would be about 11% of the global total ($7.2T / $65T).

Let’s compare this to Japan’s GDP, which is about $4.9 trillion. Consumer spending there is higher as a percentage, maybe around 55%, so $2.7 trillion. That’s roughly 4.15% globally.

  • Germany’s GDP is around $4.2 trillion. With consumer spending at around 50% of GDP, that’s $2.1 trillion, so 3.2% globally.
  • India’s GDP is approximately $3.4 trillion. Consumer spending accounts for a larger part, maybe 60%, so the total is $2.04 trillion, which is about 3.14% of the global total.
  • The UK’s GDP is about $3.1 trillion. Consumer spending at 60% would be $1.86 trillion, so around 2.86%.
  • France’s GDP is $2.9 trillion. Consumer spending at 55% gives $1.6 trillion, about 2.46%.
  • Brazil’s GDP is $2.0 trillion. If consumer spending is 60%, that’s $1.2 trillion, so 1.85%.
  • Italy’s GDP is $2.1 trillion. Consumer spending at 60% would be $1.26 trillion, around 1.94%.
  • Canada’s GDP is $2.0 trillion. Consumer spending at 57% gives $1.14 trillion, which is 1.75%.
  • South Korea’s GDP is $1.7 trillion. Consumer spending at 50% is $0.85 trillion, so 1.3%.
  • Russia’s GDP is around $1.8 trillion. If consumer spending is 50%, that’s $0.9 trillion, about 1.38%.
  • Australia’s GDP is $1.6 trillion. Consumer spending at 55% would be $0.88 trillion, 1.35%.

Consequently, the total for these top countries is around 59.65%, leaving about 40.35% for the rest of the world. This is all based on rough estimates. Then we also have nominal GDP vs. PPP (Purchasing Power Parity). However, consumer spending in nominal terms is usually what’s used for such global comparisons, further complicating our exercise.

Another consideration: The figures I used for consumer spending as a percentage of GDP might not be accurate for each country. For example, China’s consumer spending as a percentage of GDP has been increasing but was historically lower. According to the World Bank, in 2022, China’s household final consumption expenditure was about 38% of GDP. The US was around 68%, Japan about 55%, Germany 52%, India was around 59%, UK 63%, France 54%, Brazil 64%, Italy 61%, Canada 57%, South Korea 48%. So my initial estimates were somewhat close but may need adjustment.

  • US: 25T GDP * 68% = 17T
  • China: 18T * 38% = 6.84T
  • Japan: 4.9T * 55% = 2.695T
  • Germany: 4.2T * 52% = 2.184T
  • India: 3.4T * 59% = 2.006T
  • UK: 3.1T * 63% = 1.953T
  • France: 2.9T * 54% = 1.566T
  • Brazil: 2.0T * 64% = 1.28T
  • Italy: 2.1T * 61% = 1.281T
  • Canada: 2.0T * 57% = 1.14T
  • South Korea: 1.7T * 48% = 0.816T
  • Russia: 1.8T * 52% = 0.936T (assuming 52%)
  • Australia: 1.6T * 55% = 0.88T
  • Spain: 1.4T * 58% = 0.812T

So total consumer spending from these 14 countries is approximately $41.389 trillion out of about $65 trillion globally.

Now, converting each country’s consumer spending to a percentage of global:

  • US: 17 / 65 = 26.15%
  • China: 6.84 / 65 ≈ 10.52%
  • Japan: 2.695 / 65 ≈ 4.15%
  • Germany: 2.184 / 65 ≈ 3.36%
  • India: 2.006 / 65 ≈ 3.09%
  • UK: 1.953 / 65 ≈ 3.00%
  • France: 1.566 / 65 ≈ 2.41%
  • Brazil: 1.28 / 65 ≈ 1.97%
  • Italy: 1.281 / 65 ≈ 1.97%
  • Canada: 1.14 / 65 ≈ 1.75%
  • South Korea: 0.816 / 65 ≈ 1.26%
  • Russia: 0.936 / 65 ≈ 1.44%
  • Australia: 0.88 / 65 ≈ 1.35%
  • Spain: 0.812 / 65 ≈ 1.25%
  • Others: 36.3%

Please remember that these percentages are estimates of global consumer spending by country based on GDP and consumption patterns.  The United States is the largest consumer-based economy in the world, and about 26% of total world spending involves the American consumer. China is only 10.5%, and Japan is at 4.1%. Europe comes in at around 12%.

In summary, China is actively trying to build a more consumer-based economy, with policies and trends supporting this shift. However, structural and demographic challenges might slow this transition into 2028. The progress is evident, but it’s a work in progress. After 2032, they hold the potential to surpass the United States as the financial capital of the world. The problem in the United States is that the Democrats keep trying to oppress the economy like Europe, imposing socialistic goals that are not economically efficient.

Conclusion 2

Key Evidence of China’s Transition:

  • Rising Consumption Share of GDP:
    • Household consumption contributed 53% of GDP in 2023, up from ~35% in 2010. While still lower than the U.S. (~68-70%), this marks significant growth.
    • Services and high-tech industries are expanding, reflecting demand for healthcare, education, and entertainment.
  • Policy Shifts:
    • “Dual Circulation” Strategy:
    • Emphasizes domestic consumption (internal circulation) alongside international trade, reducing reliance on exports.
  • Social Reforms:
    • Efforts to strengthen social safety nets (pensions, healthcare) aim to lower household savings rates, freeing income for spending.
  • Urbanization and Middle-Class Growth:
    • Over 60% of China’s population now lives in cities, fostering a consumer class with higher disposable income.
  • E-Commerce and Digital Economy:
    • China leads globally in e-commerce (e.g., Alibaba, JD.com) and digital payments, facilitating consumer spending. The digital economy accounts for ~40% of GDP.

Challenges to a Consumer-Driven Model:

  • Structural Imbalances:
    • Investment and exports still dominate (e.g., state-led infrastructure, real estate). Transition requires rebalancing toward the private sector and services.
  • Household debt
    • has risen to ~62% of GDP (2023), potentially constraining spending.
  • Demographic and Social Factors:
    • Aging Population: By 2035, 30% of citizens will be over 60, likely increasing savings and reducing consumption.
    • Income Inequality: Rural-urban gaps and uneven wealth distribution limit broad-based consumption growth.
  • Geopolitical and Economic Risks:
    • Trade tensions and global demand volatility (e.g., post-COVID, U.S.-China decoupling) pressure China to prioritize domestic demand.
  • Real estate sector
    • Slowdowns could dampen consumer confidence.

China is deliberately building a consumer-based economy through policy reforms, urbanization, and digital innovation, rejecting the European mercantilist economic philosophy. While progress is evident, structural hurdles, such as reliance on investment aging demographics, mean the transition will be gradual but ongoing. The government’s success in addressing these challenges will determine the pace and sustainability of this shift. China’s economy remains a hybrid model, blending consumption growth with traditional drivers like state investment.

Current Accout

The current account is a key component of a country’s balance of payments, recording international transactions in goods, services, income, and transfers. It consists of four main components:

  1. Trade in Goods (Visible Trade):
    • Exports and imports of tangible products (e.g., machinery, vehicles, electronics).
    • The balance of trade in goods is often referred to as the “merchandise trade balance.”
  2. Trade in Services (Invisible Trade):
    • Exports and imports of intangible services (e.g., tourism, financial services, education, consulting, transportation).
    • Combined with trade in goods, this forms the trade balance (goods and services).
  3. Primary Income (Income Flows):
    • Cross-border income from investments and employment:
      • Investment income: Dividends, interest, profits from foreign investments (e.g., dividends from overseas stocks).
      • Compensation of employees: Wages, salaries, or benefits earned by workers in a foreign country (e.g., remittances from expatriates).
  4. Secondary Income (Current Transfers):
    • One-way transfers where no goods, services, or assets are exchanged in return:
      • Remittances: Money sent by migrants to their home country.
      • Foreign aid/grants: Government transfers (e.g., disaster relief, development aid).
      • Pensions, gifts, or donations: Transfers between individuals or organizations.

A Trade War based on just the gross of the Current Account does NOT reflect our trade deficit or surplus.

Foreign investors overall own roughly 10-20% of Manhattan’s high-end residential properties (e.g., condos), with Europeans constituting a significant but minority share of this group. For example, if Europeans account for 30-40% of foreign-owned properties, their stake might be 3-8% of Manhattan’s luxury residential market. While exact figures are elusive, Europeans likely own 3-7% of Manhattan’s total real estate, with higher concentrations in luxury residential and prime commercial sectors. This is only an estimate and not definitive. Any income, such as rents, on that property will flow out through the current account and will appear as a trade deficit when it has NOTHING to do with trade.

As of 2023, approximately 23-24% of the total U.S. national debt is held by foreign entities. This calculation is based on foreign holdings of around $7.4 trillion out of $31.4 trillion at the time. Therefore, of about $1 trillion in interest expenditures. Thus, about $230+ billion is flowing out through the current account that has nothing to do with trade. The major holders of US national debt include Japan, China, and the United Kingdom.

Understanding these components is now CRITICAL in the middle of a trade war. The sale of US debt will go through the capital account, but it will reduce the interest paid to foreigners that go through the current account, creating the illusion of a trade deficit. I disagree with Trump’s formulas, and the risk of a permanent trade war with China is now assured unless he gets on a private phone call. You cannot make public demands against China for then they cannot back down based on their culture.

Reagan Explains Socialism to a Child


Posted originally on Apr 6, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Obama’s Rent a Riots & SodaGate ReeEEeE Stream 03-23-25


Posted originally on Rumble By The Salty Cracker on: Mar 23, 2025 at 7:30 pm EST

Obama’s DIRTY SECRET: USAID Caught in Riot Money Scheme! | Elijah Schaffer


Published originally on Rumble By The Gateway Pundit on Mar 23, 2025 at 10:00 pm EST

Remembering Rush Limbaugh: How He Transformed the Conservative Movement Forever


Posted originally on Rumble By Charlie Kirk show on: Feb 22, 2025 at 6:00 am EST

Remembering Rush Limbaugh: How He Transformed the Conservative Movement Forever


Posted originally on Rumble By Charlie Kirk show on: Feb 22, 2025 at 6:00 am EST

Can Anything Be a Store of Value?


Posted originally on Jan 16, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Bitcoin M Tech 1 15 25

QUESTION: I understand that you dispute that cryptocurrency is a store of wealth because it is outside the central banks. Is this your position? Could you explain?

Respectfully submitted

Josh

ANSWER: Whoever made up this BS is most likely from the Deep State trying to control capital flows and economically imprison everyone. There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING that is a store of wealth. Looking, Investopedia defines this term:

“What Is a Store Of Value?

A store of value is an asset, commodity, or currency that maintains its value without depreciating. “

Private Assets Government Assets

It does not matter what money might be. There has been a boom and bust in every economy regardless of what they have used for money. This is an entirely Marxist Utopian idea. Why? Because to be some store of value means it CANNOT FLUCTUATE!!!!! This has stemmed from people who (1) do not understand that there are business cycles and (2) think, like Keynes and Marx, that the government can eliminate the business cycle and smooth out the economy. I had a conversation with Paul Volcker, former Chairman of the Federal Reserve. Paul admitted that the business cycle always won and that the “new economics” (Keynesian Economists) failed back in the 1970s (see his Rediscovery of the Business Cycle).

Burns Arthur

Arthur Burns, Fed Chairman, came up with the same conclusion when Bretton Woods collapsed: that the business cycle always wins. Everything rises and falls based on supply and demand. Anyone telling you that Bitcoin is a “store of wealth” is either outright lying to you or they are ignorant of what they are talking about. Nothing ever is a store of wealth because everything rises and falls.

This is why the central banks cannot control inflation, no less money supply. I you sell an office building for $1 million to another person in your country, the money supply is not impacted. However, if you are in Britain as back in 1985, when the pound fell to $1,03, Americans were buying up everything like it was on sale at Harrods. The Brits thought the Yanks were crazy buying at the top of the property market and they were wrong for everything boomed thereafter. Why?

Supply Demand

If I bought an office building in London at that time, I would have to bring in the cash from America, convert it to pounds, and buy the building. Thus, I increased the domestic money supply with important cash, and the central bank had nothing to do with that. NOTHING is a store of wealth EVER, no matter what it is, because everything will rise based on demand and crash when you can’t give it away.

Roman decline silver content monetary system Armstrong Waterfall effect

This is why empires rise and fall. Nothing has ever remained a flat line in terms of value.

Gold Clause & CBDC


Posted originally on Dec 30, 2024 by Martin Armstrong 

CBDC

QUESTION: Regarding CBDC, will they convert all the savings/cash in your bank account, will they convert everything in your brokerage accounts (all stocks etc.) will they go after gold and silver you have in storage (Brinks, for example)?

KS

ANSWER: Everything will be converted to the new CBDC. The money in your bank account is already just an electronic book entry. This is why banks are closing branches everywhere in the USA as well as Europe. They are preparing for CBDCs, which means without physical paper money, bank branches are no longer needed. You can deposit a check on your phone. The only thing left for a branch is safe deposit boxes, and the government assumes you are hiding cash there anyway. So kiss your local branch goodbye. The local bank I used because it was the closest has closed, and it is now a 30-minute ride to the closest one still open.

We the People

The monetary system will still function as normal. The exchange will probably be one-for-one. The main purpose of this is to destroy the underground economy to be able to tax everything – even the 16-year-old girl next door you hire to babysit while you go out to dinner and that $100 bill you found in the parking lot that you cheated the government out of their 50% gift tax. We are all looked down upon as scum. They presume we are all guilty and the whole debt crisis is never their fault – it is you – we the people.

1913 Income Tax

This is the natural progression of direct taxation – the complete loss of all liberty. This is why the Founding Fathers prohibited direct taxation. But the socialists seized the government and followed Marx to get the evil rich. It was introduced with the promise that only the rich would have to pay. They lied about that as well, for as soon as the income tax took place, simultaneously in the same bill, there was the payroll tax demanding employers withhold income from their workers.

1912 Vermont Income Tax
1913 Feb 4 LA Times

The federal income tax of 1913 was accompanied by the fact that the law also attempted to withhold the brand-new income tax because the people were never to be trusted. Initial estimates were that the withholding provisions would yield two-thirds of income tax revenue, but in 1916, less than 5% came from withholding. Furthermore, employers’ simple lack of compliance led to a massive groundswell of opposition to the new withholding system.

Minneapolis Payroll Tax

The people realized that the government lied to get the 16th Amendment passed, and the state politicians voted for it because it allowed them to also allowed them to impose income taxes at the state level. Even cities joined the money grab, imposing city income taxes. Every layer of government now had the right to extort money from the people based on their income, requiring disclosure of their personal lives. You gave your children money, which was circumventing income tax, so they rolled out the gift tax. , which fueled the corruption on a massive scale. The Revenue Act of 1862 included an inheritance tax and gift tax, which applied to transfers of personal assets. In 1864, Congress amended the Revenue Act, added a tax on transfers of real estate, and increased the rates for inheritance taxes. They have always used war to justify raising taxes, but they always remain in place thereafter. The War Revenue Act of 1898 implemented an inheritance tax of .74 % to 15%, which was used to fund the Spanish-American War. This is why the government loves to wage wars.