Now there is one evil connection — I can image one much worse or with such bad , no horrible potential!
Tag Archives: Obama Foreign Policy
New York Times Tells Truth About US Gov’t ISIS Connection
Any legitimate study will show that the US created ISIS with the policy’s that the administration of Obama and Hillary used in supporting the Arab Spring. There that creation was intentional or collateral damage is yet to be determined but the fact is that the US did, in fact, create ISIS ans initially arm it though Benghazi
Klayman – 2nd American Revolution May Be Inevitable, Soros To Blame
ts hard to find a person more evil that George Soros!
KOMMONSENTSJANE – MAN AND WOMAN
It seems that someone in the Army branch of the military is going to remove the “man” word out of the military MANUALS in order to make it more inclusive. It will be a giant step when…
Source: KOMMONSENTSJANE – MAN AND WOMAN
KOMMONSENTSJANE – OBAMA PASSES THE DARK ACT INTO LAW
Just one more assault on our freedoms get use to it people there are a lot more coming if Hillary gets in.
President Obama Just Signed The DARK Act Into Law
July 31, 2016
By Heather Callaghan
We regret to inform you that President Barack Obama signed into law, S. 764, which was the newest manifestation of the DARK Act (Denying Americans the Right to Know).
The DARK Acts were a way to establish federal labeling – i.e. the lack of GM labeling – and would banish all state labeling initiatives under a federal standard.
A brief press release by the White House simply mentioned a list of bills and S. 764, “which directs the Secretary of Agriculture to establish a national mandatory bioengineered food disclosure standard,” was listed at the end. The “disclosure standard” must be an inside joke, because the disclosure involves the consumer having to scan a QR code on a food product to find out about genetically modified ingredients, or call a 1-800 number. These measures might not…
View original post 656 more words
The Battle Between Islam & Christianity has Returned
Armstrong Economics Blog
Re-Posted Aug 13, 2016 by Martin Armstrong
Are we headed into a new age of Islam v Christianity? What people do not grasp is that the first panic in our list of panics from which I derived the Economic Confidence Model was 1683. That was the invasion of the Ottoman Empire directly against Vienna, which was the seat of the Holy Roman Emperor resurrected following the death of Charlemagne. The First Crusade (1095–1099) was the the initiation of this religious war. However, the actual conflict between Christianity and Islam began in 1064. The Seljuk Turks stormed Anatolia (modern Turkey), taking Caesarea and Ani. This was the beginning of the invasion of the Turks into Western culture. In Spain, King Ferdinand of Castile took on June 9 – Coimbra. Then, European warriors stormed Spain to participate to the siege of Barbastro, which Pope Alexander II first preached the Reconquista in 1063 as a “Christian emergency. This expedition is sanctioned by the Pope and was really the first Crusade despite the history books. The Crusade of Barbastro was an international expedition to take the territory from the Hudid Emirate of Lārida. The large army was composed of elements from all over Western Europe and the siege and conquest of the city thus took place in 1064. From this point in time, 309.6 years later we end in the preparation for the final peak in the Ottoman Empire.
The Ottoman Empire was founded in 1299 and had moved into Eastern Europe conquering Serbia 1389 and Bulgaria by 1396. Constantinople fell in 1453. It was during the 14th century when the Ottomans revived the still-older concept of a caliphate. They declared that the sultan and caliph were one and the same. Murad I (ruler June 1326 -June 1389) was the first Ottoman ruler to actually claim the title of Sultan 1383. The holder of the title Sultan was originally the power behind the throne of the Caliph in Bagdad. It was later used for various independent Muslim Monarchs. This title was senior to and more prestigious than that of Amir. Moreover, it was not like the title of Malik ‘King’, which was really a secular title or Shah among Persian or Iranian rulers. Murad I actually established the former Osmanli tribe converting this into into a sultanate.
Therefore, we are looking at the resurrection of the caliphate, which began in 1383 and reached its peak in 309.6 years. by 1692. It was ultan Mehmed IV (Sultan 1648 to 1687) who marked the peak. His ambition was to take all of Europe. On May 3, 1683, Sultan Mehmed IV entered Belgrade. Then on July 14, 1683, his 140,000-man Ottoman army arrived at Vienna and began to lay siege to the city, whioch was the seat of the Holy Roman Empire. Then on September 12, 1683, the Battle of Vienna took place. The Ottoman siege of the city was broken with the arrival of a force of 70,000 Poles, Austrians and Germans under Polish–Lithuanian king. This was the contest between Islam and Christianity. From that point onward, with the death of Mehmed IV in 1687, the decline and fall took shape by 1692.
This claim of the Sultan being the caliphate lasted until 1924, when Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, the great modernizer, abolished the office as a relic, insisting that Turks had to build a new Turkey and not lay claim to an enervating empire, temporal or spiritual. This was covered by the magazine the Economist on March 8th, 1924. Therefore, 1924 marked the split of the Muslim world into two primary factions with the Turks and other nationalities being free of Ottoman rule, embraced Western culture.
However, the rise of ISIS is the attempt to resurrect the Caliphate. However, the concept behind the Caliphate lies a message of salvation through an international Muslim solidarity. The President of Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, retains a vision for “his” rebirth of Turkey. He dreams not only of new age of the Ottoman Empire and the former glory, but of a caliphate reborn and led by a Turk. Many suspect that he sees himself as the coming Caliph and this is greatly ignored in the West. The end of the Caliphate in 1924 was 860 years from 1064. There is a significant risk that we will end up in a religious battle by 2036 on the other side of 2032.
Tracking Everyone Hunting for Money on Trains or in the Air
Armstrong Economics Blog
Re-Posted Aug 12, 2016 by Martin Armstrong
We have certainly embarked down the road of a police state. Federal agencies are tracking people who travel on trains or in the air. If someone buys a ticket for cash, they government is notified. They are looking for the slightest thing. I went to the airport to pick up a friend who comes over to the States maybe four times a year. I ended up waiting for nearly 3 hours. They took the person and searched everything. The agent then handed them to someone else and said “see if you can find something! I found nothing.” Finally, they escorted them out to me and then began interrogating me saying that frequent trips set off a “red flag” and then asked what I did simply because I was there to pick them up. I am not easily intimidated and can hold my ground. So they backed off and released them.
I was flying back to the States from Europe over the July 4th holiday. My ticket was originally booked for JFK in New York. I then remembered the travel would be horrific so I switched to Philadelphia. When I landed, I was met by two IRS agents. Apparently there was sting they set up at JFK looking for American coming home for holidays who do not pay taxes here. I said you can check I pay my taxes here and do not live overseas. That was not good enough. They though I was tipped off to their sting in NYC and sent two agents to intercept me in Philadelphia simply because I switched planes.
I took the train from Brussels to London after meetings there with government so I was dressed in a suit and tie. Everyone else on the train were tourists. I was the only called aside by British customs. They asked how much money did I have on me. I showed them my US passport. That was NOT enough. They wanted to see my ticket where I bought it and how I paid.
When I returned from our Berlin Conference last year, I dressed casual in jeans. But traveling alone I was again singled out. Again they wanted to know how much cash I had on me. The hunt for money is getting really bad. You cannot train on a train in Europe without them looking for money. In Italy, they confiscated a stack of bonds from a passenger on the train to Switzerland. A staff member left Switzerland on the train for a meeting in Lichtenstein which goes through France. The train was stopped in France and police search bags looking for cash.
In the USA, now even the DEA is searching all travel records on trains and in the air. They target people who buy one-way tickets or pay cash for a ticket. We should just legalize drugs and that would end the crime and the confiscation of citizens. Now everyone is a suspect for the slightest thing.
German MEPs want EU members fined for not accepting migrants
These are not refuges or migrants and Mekerl’s policy of bring them into the EU is destroying the EU. What she is doing makes no sense but then neither does what Obama does they are two birds of a feather flying into a hurricane and that will not end well!
Thomson Reuters Leak on over 2 million records of People & Firms they say are Questionable
Armstrong Economics Blog
Re-Posted Aug 11, 2016 by Martin Armstrong
There has been a major leak of a list of “suspected” people who maybe criminals with links to profiles individuals and businesses suspected of ties to organised crime and terrorism. This leak online has serious implications and was the result of a list which emerged from a Thomson-Reuters who has engaged in a due diligence claimed service called World-Check. The question about the validity of such a service certainly involves privacy concerns. There is also some serious implications that if they claim someone has some connection to anything, is this true or not and does this prevent someone from doing business to renting an apartment. What are the sources of their information? All of this comes into question.
Italy’s Referendum
Armstrong Economics Blog
Re-Re-Posted Aug 11, 2016 by Martin Armstrong
QUESTION: Mr. Armstrong; You said other nations would follow Britain. It appears that Italy is doing so with their referendum. Is this correct?
You are very famous in Germany by the way.
Thank you.
KG
ANSWER: Yes. Prime Minister Matteo Renzi has said that a victory in the poll would end Italy’s questionable political system which has prevented any government completing a full term since the Second World War. This may actually be part of the shift in politics coming in Italy. Nonetheless, a defeat will mean the end of the line for pro-Brussels direction of Italy. This referendum is all about changing Italy’s 1948 republican constitution which is legally required for popular consent.
This is a major political gamble for the pro-EU centre-left government akin to BREXIT. The opinion polls are showing many of the 50 million voters are undecided and the “No” camp gaining momentum in what will be a very close campaign. Support for opposition parties who want to leave Brussels have been certainly emboldened by Britain’s historic decision to leave the EU which is growing and the battleground will be this referendum.
Renzi may be forced out as was the case with David Cameron. Italy’s highest court gave the green light to a referendum that Prime Minister Renzi says will either guarantee political stability with staying in the EU or he will resign if voters do not approve the constitutional changes he hopes for. The high court validated the more than 500,000 signatures required for the referendum. Now, the government has 60 days to set a referendum date which may come in November or as late as December. The referendum is most likely going to be held after parliament approves the 2017 budget, a draft of which must be presented by Oct. 20th, 2016 and approval by both houses would take about a month.
The protracted political uncertainty is a cloud hanging over all of Europe. It has been the mad ruch into Germany 10-year paper at negative rates showing that people are just parking money. This is not a question about making a return. They are buying the German paper assuming the euro will break and they will get Deutschemarks once again.
The actual reform proposed by this referendum would shrink the upper house, cutting the number of senators to 100 from 315, and stripping it of powers over the budget and its ability to bring down a government. Instead, it would have oversight of local, rather than national, issues. Renzi supports this to prevent the upper house from stopping his agenda. It would increase the powers of the federal government while diluting the 20 regions with respect to national policy. This will be accompanied by a new two-round voting system for the lower house. Here, Renzi says the changes should finally make Italy a governable country.
The rising opposition parties are very anti-immigrant. The Northern League in particular, warns that Italy is being stripped of any democratic checks thaty were designed to prevent a strong national government and the rise once again of some political strongman like Fascist dictator Benito Mussolini. This is becoming the hot topic and this is a vote on the future of Renzi and Europe
Centinel2012 