Putin Lashes Out At Obama: “Show Some Proof Or Shut Up”


Tyler Durden's picture

Putin has had enough of the relentless barrage of US accusations that he, personally, “hacked the US presidential election.”

The Russian president’s spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, said on Friday that the US must either stop accusing Russia of meddling in its elections or prove it. Peskov said it was “indecent” of the United States to “groundlessly” accuse Russia of intervention in its elections.

“You need to either stop talking about it, or finally show some kind of proof. Otherwise it just looks very indecent”, Peskov told Reporters in Tokyo where Putin is meeting with Japan PM Abe, responding to the latest accusations that Russia was responsible for hacker attacks.

Peskov also warned that Obama’s threat to “retaliate” to the alleged Russian hack is “against both American and international law”, hinting at open-ended escalation should Obama take the podium today at 2:15pm to officially launch cyberwar against Russia.

Previously, on Thursday, Peskov told the AP the report was “laughable nonsense“, while Russian foreign ministry spox Maria Zakharova accused “Western media” of being a “shill” and a “mouthpiece of various power groups”, and added that “it’s not the general public who’s being manipulated,” Zakharova said. “the general public nowadays can distinguish the truth. It’s the mass media that is manipulating themselves.”

Meanwhile, on Friday Sergei Lavrov, Russia’s foreign minister told state television network, Russia 24, he was “dumbstruck” by the NBC report which alleges that Russian President Vladimir Putin was personally involved in an election hack.

The report cited U.S. intelligence officials that now believe with a “high level of confidence” that Putin became personally involved in a secret campaign to influence the outcome of the U.S. presidential election. “I think this is just silly, and the futility of the attempt to convince somebody of this is absolutely obvious,” Lavrov added, according to the news outlet.

As a reminder, last night Obama vowed retaliatory action against Russia for its meddling in the US presidential election last month.  “I think there is no doubt that when any foreign government tries to impact the integrity of our elections that we need to take action and we will at a time and place of our own choosing,” Obama told National Public Radio.

US intelligence agencies in October pinned blame on Russia for election-related hacking. At the time, the White House vowed a “proportional response” to the cyberactivity, though declined to preview what that response might entail. Meanwhile, both President-elect Donald Trump, the FBI, and the ODNI have dismissed the CIA’s intelligence community’s assessment, for the the same reason Putin finally lashed out at Obama: there is no proof.

That, however, has never stopped the US from escalating a geopolitical conflict to the point of war, or beyond, so pay close attention to what Obama says this afternoon.

According to an NBC report, a team of analysts at Eurasia Group said in a note on Friday that they believe the outgoing administration is likely to take action which could result in a significant barrier for Trump’s team once he takes office in January.

“It is unlikely that U.S. intelligence reports will change Trump’s intention to initiate a rapprochement with Moscow, but the congressional response following its own investigations could obstruct the new administration’s effort,” Eurasia Group analysts added.

At the same time, Wikileaks offered its “validation” services, tweeting that “Obama should submit any Putin documents to WikiLeaks to be authenticated to our standards if he wants them to be seen as credible.

We doubt Obama would take the whistleblower organization on its offer, even if he did have any Putin documents to authenticate.

Earnest Struggles to Answer How ‘Effective’ Obama’s Response to Russian Hacking Was


No one has ever shown any “evidence” that Russia or Putin “hacked” into and changed the election results making Trump the winner over Hillary. There were leaks from insiders apparently at the DNC and from someone with access to Podesa that provided internal emails to Julian Assuage at Wikileaks. which presented the DNC and the Clinton team in a negative like. The national traditional media played this material down so the general public never really new much about this, however it to help support Trump with his already large band of deplorables. Hillary was her own worst enemy and ran a poor campaign which was the primary reason she lost twice; first to Obama and then second to trump.

To claim now that Putin elected Trump is absurd; Putin is a ruthless tyrant and if he actually had all this information he wold have kept it to use against Hillary after she was elected as blackmail. Trowing that information away to supported elect trump would have don’t him little good as trump is the master negotiator and would have made a tougher world leader than Hillary so there was no upside to Putin supporting Trump and the argument falls apart!

Why I Oppose George Soros


Soros, I believe, is trying to do the same thing as Karl Marx. He is funding an experiment to alter society into what he thinks it should be. I believe in Adam Smith and the best way to help society is to rid it of people like Soros who think they have the right to reshape society into what they believe it should be. The invisible hand works fine and it is the essence of nature. People like Soros admit they do not believe in God, so that means they also assume the universe is theirs to manipulate and play the role of  God. People like Soros always want to rule the world through central planning. It is just not possible, for humanity is the inventor driven by the mother of everything — necessity — never the rulers.

lions-killing-elephantSorry, I have studied the world through the eyes of our clients globally, watching how we all act in our own self-interest just as animals in the wild also have a survival instinct. The design of nature is that one species survives by consuming another. The idea that we can create utopia where everyone enjoys perfect harmony is against the design of nature.

In trading, Soros was quick to recognize a currency peg that was against the natural cycle and thus was overvalued. He jumped on that currency and devoured it just like a lion. Then he wants to pretend to be God and make it an open society?

Soros needs to first study his own actions that are the same as a lion and its prey. He is not competent to judge the world while he bribes or supports politicians who will agree to his idea as long as he hands them the money.

Sorry, I believe in laissez-faire because the system is far too complicated for man to try to change it.

Mutually Beneficial Leverage – Nigel Farage Visits Trump Tower Today…


It is somewhat funny, perhaps quizzically so, that people cannot see the mutually beneficial play amid the strong relationship formed between Donald Trump and Nigel Farage.   Essentially and substa…

Source: Mutually Beneficial Leverage – Nigel Farage Visits Trump Tower Today…

trump-standing-in-gap411221112112111111121111111111111211

The Many Times Russian Hackers Didn’t Damage Hillary’s Campaign


WOW those Russians are real good!

Why Feminists Hate Men: What They Won’t Tell You!


Why Civilizations Rise and Fall | Michael Woodley of Menie and Stefan Molyneux


An Honest Conversation About Race and Gender Differences


The War Against Men | Tom Golden and Stefan Molyneux


“You Haven’t Succeeded Once”: State Department Slammed By AP Reporter Over Failure In Syria


Tyler Durden's picture

The battle for Aleppo is over, and Assad has won, with AP quoting the Syrian leader that “history is being made with the defeat” of the insurgents contained in the city.

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad said on Thursday the events taking place in the city of Aleppo are a historic moment, and said the world will be different after what he called the “liberation of Aleppo”.

“What is happening today is the writing of a history written by every Syrian citizen. The writing did not start today, it started six years ago when the crisis and war started against Syria,” Assad said in a video statement published on the Syrian Presidency’s Twitter account.

 

And while Syria and Russia enjoy the spoils from his biggest victory since the start of the Syrian conflict, the US State Department is being slammed for losing the Syrian proxy war. Meanwhile, after three years of backing and arming rebels brought no major progress in the Syrian war, Washington has accused Moscow of “failure” to achieve peace. Yesterday, the State Department was finally called out by AP on the lack of progress in Syria, forcing department spokespersons John Kirby to once again blame Russia.

As caught on the recording below, the daily briefing at the State Department started off with a verbal sparring match between AP reporter Brad Klapper and department spokesman John Kirby. Klapper asked Kirby why the US was “laying all the blame” for developments in Aleppo on Russia, while also questioning what Washington was doing different than Moscow. The US, Klapper said, “failed repeatedly, doing the same thing over and over again” but continued to accuse Russia of war crimes “when things go badly.”

“You [the US] haven’t succeeded once,” Klapper said.

Kirby did not answer the latter of Klapper’s questions, instead offering his explanation of why Russia bears responsibility. “The failure is on Russia for not putting the proper pressure on the Assad regime to stop the brutality, the gassing, the surrender, the starvation of their own people. That’s the real failure here,” Kirby said, claiming that the US, unlike Russia, has been pursuing only political solutions.

“You don’t think the US has failed?” the reporter continued to press on.

Refusing to take any blame for America’s actions, Kirby continued to dodge the question.

“You talked about the United States failure. What I would say is the international community has remained focused on trying to bring about a better outcome in Syria,” he said, stressing that the US “is a leader in that effort.”

Then several minutes into the exchange, Kirby would not admit the possibility of the US approach as it is failing to achieve a peaceful solution despite years of attempts.

“Secretary [of State John Kerry] would be the first to tell you that he’s enormously frustrated that we are still where we are with respect to what’s going on the ground in Syria. Nobody’s happy about that,” he said, praising Washington’s efforts on the diplomatic front.

After his response did not seem to satisfy Klapper, Kirby commented: “Look, you can shake your head in disgust about the answer all you want.”

Showing a sense of humor, Klapper argued that it was “too late” for any changes to be made given that the Obama administration and Secretary John Kerry’s tenures are coming to an end in just over a month.  “You’re not describing any different kind of approach or anything you’re going to do to somehow change the equation,” he said. “It’s too late for that. You have no time left and you’re saying you’re not going to telegraph something that we know is not going to happen.”

However, according to Kirby, despite what Klapper or the AP might “feel,” Secretary Kerry remains eager to try to find a political solution to the conflict.

Meanwhile, having taken over Aleppo, the Syrian proxy war is now in its final stages, with the Assad government, thanks to Russian backing, now assured a victory, especially since Trump has repeatedly stated that he is looking forward to de-escalating the middle east conflict, and no longer is looking to “change heads of state”, a development which will infuriate Qatar, whose gas pipeline to Europe appears doomed to never be constructed.