Posted originally on the CTH on September 29, 2024 | Sundance
Elon Musk sent the entire world a significant and consequential alarm message on Sunday, September 29, 2024 at 11:11am. [Here is the LINK]
The complete message is below.
ELON MUSK – “Very few Americans realize that, if Trump is NOT elected, this will be the last election. Far from being a threat to democracy, he is the only way to save it!
Let me explain: if even 1 in 20 illegals become citizens per year, something that the Democrats are expediting as fast as humanly possible, that would be about 2 million new legal voters in 4 years.
The voting margin in the swing states is often less than 20 thousand votes. That means if the “Democratic” Party succeeds, there will be no more swing states!!
Moreover, the Biden/Harris administration has been flying “asylum seekers”, who are fast-tracked to citizenship, directly into swing states like Pennsylvania, Ohio, Wisconsin and Arizona. It is a surefire way to win every election.
America then becomes a one-party state and Democracy is over. The only “elections” will be the Democratic Party primaries. This already happened in California many years ago, following the 1986 amnesty.
The only thing holding California back from extreme socialism and suffocating government policies is that people can leave California and still remain in America. Once the whole country is controlled by one party, there will be no escape.
Everywhere in America will be like the nightmare that is downtown San Francisco.” ~Elon Musk
On Friday, Kamala Harris provided the receipts for Elon Musk’s warning:
Yet the media gaslights and continues to say this is a conspiracy theory.
Here is the Democrat nominee saying she wants to give millions of illegals citizenship. pic.twitter.com/orWoqsFzp0
Posted originally on the CTH onSeptember 29, 2024 | Sundance
Comrades, I’m really glad to see former Secretary of State and Climate Czar, John Kerry, outline the transparent truth of their intention in such a matter-of-fact way. Trust me, this is a really good thing. Perhaps no 2-minute encapsulation of current events more accurately outlines the worldview of the Biden-Harris administration, than this one.
Within the recent WEF discussion, Secretary Kerry outlines how freedom of speech is a ‘threat to the global democracy‘ because the governing officials have a difficult time controlling information. Kerry goes on to posit how the next administration, presumably in his hope Kamala Harris, will forcefully structure all the tools of government to stop Americans from using the first amendment to freely speak about issues.
Governing is too challenging, according to Kerry, when the government cannot stop people from seeking and discovering information that is against their interests. Effective governing required compliant adherence to a singular ideology. Against the backdrop of COVID-19 and a host of similarly related government narratives, if people are free to find alternative information and think for themselves, they become increasingly more difficult to control. Yes, this is said quite openly. This is the mindset of those in power. WATCH:
.
On another positive note, millions of people now accurately understand why it is so important to refute the terms “mis-dis-mal information.” When CTH initially warned about the labeling, most people did not understand; however, as the consequences begin to surface, I would argue almost a majority of people now understand.
2022: CTH encountered criticism for our position on information. Perhaps it is important to step back and explain exactly why we should not be playing by rules, like those proposed by John Kerry, which are established to control us while engaged in the battle of ideas. First, my position:
…”There is no such thing as “disinformation” or “misinformation”. There is only information you accept and information you do not accept. You were not born with a requirement to believe everything you are told; rather, you were born with a brain that allows you to process the information you receive and make independent decisions.”…
There is only information.
There are only two elements within the public discussion of information, truth and not truth.
In an era filled with “fact-checkers” and institutional guardians at the gates of Big Tech, let me explain exactly why it is important not to accept the speech rules of the guards.
When you accept the terms “disinformation”, “misinformation” or the newest lingo, “malinformation,” you are beginning to categorize truth and lies in various shades. You are merging black and white, right and wrong, into various shades of grey.
When your mind works in the grey zone, you are, by direct and factual consequence, saying there is a problem. You are correct; however, this is where people may make a mistake. The problem is supposed to be there.
It is not a solution to the problem to try and remove the grey simply because it takes too much work to separate the white pixels from the black ones. You were born with a gift, the greatest gift a loving God could provide. You were born with a brain and set of natural instincts that are tools to do this pixel separation, use them.
If you define the grey work as a problem you cannot solve on your own, you open the door for others to solve that problem for you. You begin to abdicate the work, and that’s when trouble can enter.
The sliding scale of Pinocchio’s is one of the most familiar yet goofy outcomes.
Put more clearly, when you accept the terminology “disinformation”, you accept a problem.
The problem is then the tool by which authorities will step in to make judgements.
Speech, in its most consequential form, is then qualified by others to whom you have sub-contracted your thinking.
When you willingly sub-contract information filters to others, you have lost connection with the raw information.
CTH was founded upon the belief that truth has no agenda, nor does it care about you, your feelings, or your opinion of it. It just sits there, empirically existing as evidence of information in its most pure form.
The search for truth, in all things, is the mission objective of this assembly. Often, we don’t like the truth; often, the truth is bitter, cold, challenging and even painful to accept. However, the truth doesn’t care. Information in its most raw form is ambivalent to your opinion. If you struggle to accept these things, that’s when you need grey. The New York Times is not called the “grey lady” accidentally.
Personally, I am an absorber of information – perhaps on a scale that is unusual. But I do not discount information from any form until I can put context to it and see if the information makes sense given all the variables present. When something doesn’t feel right, it’s almost always because it isn’t right.
Often, I find myself struggling in the grey and complex. It is not unusual to spend days, perhaps weeks, researching, digging, clarifying a situation, only to discover the path to finding the truth is in another direction entirely. Erasing everything and starting over is frustrating, but it is genuinely the only approach that works; and often finding truth is supposed to be difficult, that’s why it is rewarding.
In the digital information age, we are bombarded with information. It is easy to be overwhelmed and need to find something or someone who has better skills at separating the black grains from the white ones. All opinions in this quest should be considered; thus, it is important to allow the free flow of information.
I am not necessarily a speech absolutist. There is some language, particularly foul language, that needs to be constrained if we are to participate in a respectful society, with grandma’s rules and knowing the audience. Articulation of arguments needs to be effective, respectful and forthright.
CTH has guidelines for comments for this exact reason. It’s not about what is said, most often it is about how the opinion is said, vulgarity is not appropriate. Those constraints need to be based on a set of inherent values. However, when it comes to information it is important to draw a distinction from speech.
There needs to be an open venue for all information. Unfortunately, when we begin to apply labels or categorization to information, there’s an opportunity for information to be manipulated – even weaponized. We are in this situation right now.
Saul Alinsky spent decades pondering the best techniques to weaponize information and speech. Alinsky’s intentions in the endeavor to change society by changing how language and information was used were not good. He devoted his completed rulebook book to Lucifer.
Be careful about anyone saying we need to label or categorize information in order to control or remove a certain speaker from the discussion.
You were not born with a requirement to believe everything you are told; rather, you were born with a God-given brain that allows you to process the information you receive and make independent decisions.
COVID-19 and the subsequent government lies, have helped many people to see just how dangerous the modern political Marxists are. Those who proposed a “global information governance board,” are now on their heels and increasingly desperate. Hence, “governing is now hard” according to John Kerry.
The flickering flame of liberty and freedom has been under assault for decades, we are at an inflection point. I remain optimistic in our ability to defeat those who are trying desperately to use all the mechanics of every system to retain power, for the same reason that all abusive relationships eventually have to end.
Posted originally on the CTH on September 27, 2024 | Sundance
This is an interesting and curiously unmentioned diplomatic contrast.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer had a two-hour dinner with President Donald Trump after the U.K leader delivered a speech to the United Nations in New York. However, intentionally unnoticed by U.S. media, the Prime Minister immediately left the U.S. following the lengthy meeting with President Trump, and never met with Kamala Harris.
The extensive discussion and dinner took place in New York, apparently at Trump Tower. There is an aspect of typical British worry woven throughout British media reporting on the meeting because U.K. Foreign Secretary David Lammy, also attended the meeting. Lammy once called President Trump a “woman-hating, neo-Nazi sympathizing sociopath.”
Undoubtably, when the priority of the dinner is overlaid with the U.K position on Ukraine; keep in mind a meeting with Zelenskyy followed the next morning; PM Starmer appears a little worried. There is a massive amount of geopolitical embarrassment possible right around the corner when, not if, President Trump wins – and the position of the British govt toward Ukraine leaves them dancing alone when the music stops.
CONTEXT: Chairman Xi is big geopolitically, driven mostly by his economic position. President Putin has become bigger geopolitically as a result of his smart post-sanction moves, in combination with his increasing economic position. Heck, even Mohammed Bin Salmon (Saudi Arabia) and Narendra Modi (India) are now big in a world of stupidly applied Bidenomics. However, when you consider the dynamic of actually using economic leverage as THE truest aspect of geopolitical power, President Trump is GODZILLA.
Starmer and the rest, eh, lol. Prime Minister Keir Starmer meeting with President Trump is what might be called, ‘risk mitigation‘. And people were wondering why Ric Grenell was present beside Donald Trump for the past few days. lolol… {{¹Hint}}
BBC, UK – Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has met up with Donald Trump for the first time.
He had a two-hour dinner with the former US President at his New York base – Trump Tower.
The pair were joined by Foreign Secretary David Lammy for the meeting.
The Prime Minister said it was “good” he had the opportunity to meet the Republican presidential candidate and that it was “really to establish a relationship between” the two of them.
A UK government source said that Keir Starmer had “welcomed” the opportunity to meet the former president.
It added that the pair had “discussed the longstanding friendship between the UK and the US and the importance of continuing to develop the strong and enduring partnership between our two countries.” (link)
Gee…..
….. Why would Ric Grenell be in the key meetings with foreign leadership?
Posted originally on Sep 26, 2024 By Martin Armstrong
🚨 #Argentina | El presidente @JMilei anuncia su desvinculación del Pacto de Futuro ONU 2045:
🗣️ "Invitamos a todas las naciones del mundo libre a que nos acompañen en la creación de una nueva agenda para esta noble institución: La Agenda de la Libertad. A partir de este día… pic.twitter.com/6mJnwMy36Q
avier Milei has done incredible things for Argentina. He carried the nation out of socialism-induced poverty and has been warning the globalists that their vision for a socialistic society will not be successful. Milei delivered a powerful message at the United Nations General Assembly, warning against the catastrophic attempt to create a “socialist-style supranational government program.”
The United Nations is openly discussing how it will take sovereignty from all member nations. They believe that nations should give up sovereignty for anything they deem an emergency to push out their goal for the New World Order. The World Health Organization (WHO) has been aiding the UN in undermining individual national sovereignty under the premise that it is for utilitarian purposes.
These non-government, unelected entities are openly attempting to remove all human rights. These groups are backed by billionaire philanthropists like Bill Gates who are eager to start the next pandemic to use as an excuse to remove national authority. Milei said that the plans for power are promoting “a toxic relationship between global governance policies and international credit agencies,” saying that the most regulated countries will be forced to become “perpetual debtors” to “promote the global elite’s agenda.” They are attempting socialism on a worldwide scale where wealthy nations will be demonized. Part of Agenda 2030 clearly dictates that America can no longer be a superpower; in fact, no one nation can be a superpower, as all power will be held by the elite few.
Javier Milei criticized the entire counsel in-person and said that the UN has become “a multi-tentacled leviathan that aims to decide not only what each nation-state should do, but also how all the citizens of the world should live.” Milei warned against the dangers of the World Economic Forum’s Agenda 2030 and the Pact for the Future. “What is being discussed – this week, here, in New York, at the Summit of the Future – is nothing other than the deepening of that tragic course that this institution has adopted,” Milei continued.
Agenda 2030 has been around for many years, yet it is deemed a conspiracy by those who are too afraid to accept it as fact. Milei called the globalist plan “nothing other than a supranational government program, socialist in nature, that seeks to solve the problems of modernity with solutions that infringe on the sovereignty of nation-states and violate people’s right to life, liberty and property.”
The president proudly stated he would no longer remain neutral about this blatant corruption. He showed impressive bravery by speaking out directly against these agencies when no other world leader is willing to do so. The world needs more leaders like Javier Milei who represent the PEOPLE.
[Agenda 2030] “is an agenda, which aims to solve poverty, inequality and discrimination with legislation that the only thing it does is to deepen them . Because the history of the world shows that the only way to guarantee prosperity is by limiting the power of the monarch , guaranteeing equality before the law and defending the right to life, liberty and property of individuals,” he added. Every single attempt at socialism and communism has failed miserably and resulted in nations crumbling.
“If the 2030 Agenda failed – as its own promoters acknowledge – the answer should be to ask ourselves whether it was not an ill-conceived agenda to begin with, accept that reality and change course. One cannot pretend to persist in the mistake by redoubling the bet on an agenda that has failed. The same thing always happens with ideas coming from the left: they design a model according to what human beings should be – according to them – and when individuals – freely – act otherwise, they have no better solution than to restrict, repress and restrict their freedom, ” Milei criticized.
How can we permit this globalist cabal to decimate our freedoms? No indepdent constitutions would exist. The globalist cabal would have more power than all nations combined. The New World Order is not a conspiracy, but rather, a clear-cut plan that global agencies are openly constructing as the people turn a blind eye.
Two powerful movies are coming out before the election, demonstrating how polarized this has become and the shenanigans taking place to rig this election. A grand jury was found even back in 1908, and it was “doubtful if there has been an honest election for years.” When Scotland had its referendum on leaving the UK, the extent of corruption that was used to ensure that the vote would fail was off the charts. The people they wanted to separate from were sent to count the Scottish votes.
We have been fooled for centuries. When people get power, they just never want to give it up. That is human nature. This election is between the Neocons vs We the People. You are not voting for Kamala; you are voting for the established Deep State that runs the place all the time. They wanted Kamala, who is like Biden and will sign whatever they put in front of her. Will there ever be an honest election ever?
While I would like to believe in the Constitution and government will be honest, just for once, I know that is being just a fool denying reality. I also know that there is no talking to 40% of the people on either side of this political divide because there is no chance of changing their minds and a greater chance of me only getting frustrated. As Julius Caesar said over 2000 years ago, people believe what they want to believe. All we can do is stand on the sidelines and understand what is coming.
Posted originally on Sep 25, 2024 By Martin Armstrong
Over 130 nations are attempting to create a digital currency as we move toward a cashless society. I recently explained how Australiais prioritizing a wholesale CBDC with a retail one to follow. The Bank of Canada recently shelved plans to create a digital Loonie, but rest assured this is a mere pause as the world will move to digitalization.
“The Bank has undertaken significant research towards understanding the implications of a retail central bank digital currency, including exploring the implications of a digital dollar on the economy and financial system, and the technological approaches to providing a digital form of public money that is secure and accessible,” the bank said in an email statement. The fact of the matter is that Canada simply could not determine how to execute a digital Loonie properly. The bank will now focus on “evolving” its payment system.
One aspect most nations are facing is that it would be easier, seamless even, if every developed nation agreed to go digital. But, more on that later.
The Bank of Canada released “The Role of Public Money in the Digital Age”in July 2024 to discuss the importance of creating a digital currency to “uniform money.” The central bank identified the following risks:
“Over that horizon, three interrelated and overlapping trends pose risks to the monetary system. First, the overall digitalization of the economy and financial system is increasing demand for digital payments. Second, due to the first trend and other conditions, use of cash has been declining at the point of sale for many years. The third trend is the emergence and proliferation of private cryptocurrencies and digital assets, including foreign CBDCs. These trends pose risks to the monetary system through three mechanisms: • increased potential that fragmentation of the monetary system could create inefficiencies • increased ability of issuers of private forms of money to exert market power • increased difficulty implementing timely and adequate regulation due to the rapid pace of change”
Unlike Australia, Canada sought to tackle retail immediately and stated cash was “no longer a viable payment option.”
The central bank recognized their legal right to have a monopoly over the money supply and noted that cryptocurrencies were threatening their overall power. Central banks DO NOT want people to use crypto as an alternative to their currency and will do everything to prevent it from happening. “When different forms of money (including alternative units of account) compete in a jurisdiction, users need to monitor both risks and exchange rates, and the resulting frictions provide scope for the issuers of these alternative forms of money to exert market power. Ultimately, these frictions and abuse of market power reduce the efficiency of the economy,” the report stated.
Now the central bank recognized it could not simply cancel the currency without public backlash. They fear that the public will use alternative payment methods, and so the plan was to slowly phase out physical money. “We do not suggest a “CBDC alone” approach. On the contrary, in the status quo policy, the availability of retail public money interplays with the evolution of the regulatory components of the monetary system to ensure their continued effectiveness.”
As I have stated countless times, money is whatever someone is willing to accept as payment, be it gold or seashells, as in ancient times. The public at large is not ready to accept a CBDC if they are presented with a choice. If Canada were to implement a digital Loonie, it would run the risk of people using other currencies or crypto to complete transactions.
The bank said it will continue monitoring GLOBAL retail CBDC progress as all financial institutions await the moment when they can align their activities. This is why we see a heightened need for biometric data and digital identifications, which will one day tie into your financial accounts and you simply will not have a choice in digital or physical currency if paying on the grid.
Governments will become increasingly tyrannical as we move towards 2032 and the end of this private wave. The globalists’ ideal monetary system would entail one universal currency, similar to what the International Monetary Fund has been developing for years. Canada, an IMF member, has decided to await future global developments, but do not mistake this pause for a ceasefire in the war on cash.
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America
Centinel2012 