Tag Archives: J6 Insurrection

Sep 23 2024

Whites in America are Doomed by 2045, Abortion Rules, & Western Culture Declines


Posted originally on Sep 23, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

US Population Whites 9 20 24

QUESTION #1: Is it true that Socrates has projected that the White population will be the minority by 2045?

Eric

COMMENT #1: Why do Democrats hate children and promote abortion, always claiming incest and rape when all the statistics show rape accounts for just 1% of abortions and incest is 0.5% of abortions? Then they open the borders and flood in all of these people while promoting killing our children. This makes no sense.

DK

US_population Percent Change 2011 2022

ANSWER: Yes. What Biden did by opening the border may have stacked the debt for the Democrats to retain power, but at what cost? They have not only ensured that the White Population will become the minority by 2045, but they have set in motion the collapse of the United States. The Democratic socialist policies of always taxing those who work to hand to the votes which they bribe to retain power have sealed the demise of the United States, the same way Communism collapsed in 1989. Unfortunately, this is the trend, and we should better prepare for the separation of the United States, for it will be impossible to reverse this trend for the forecast.

Thatcher Socialism

I do not care what the socialists say; this system is no more sustainable than communism. As Margaret Thatch warned, socialism reaches that point when you run out of other peoples’ money. This is WHY the United States will break up into at least three regions. There is no way these economic policies will survive. The odds are on my side. No a single city-state, nation, or empire has every beaten that forecast.

2009 Ginsberg Eugenics

In contrast, Democrats seem to hate children, for they are always championing abortion and have called it a Woman’s right when Justice Ginsberg, who was a woman’s activist, said it was all about reducing the population – not women’s rights. I do not have an answer to this puzzling question. They seem to hate babies and live immigrants. This is perplexing.

Abortion_Rape_and_incest

Even when I look at the article you sent, it is dated 2019. The press seems to avoid this topic that only 1% of women obtain an abortion because they became pregnant through rape, and less than 0.5% do so because of incest, according to the Guttmacher Institute. Yet the battle over exceptions for both has garnered seized attention in the national abortion debate. ABC News appears to have deliberately lied about ABORTION during the debate. Why? Disney hates babies, too? Planned Parenthood takes $1.9 million of taxpayer funding to abort over 1,000 babies every day. Why does Kamala want to expand abortion and make it a federally funded procedure, killing Americans while letting in millions of aliens? Hello, at this rate not only will white Americans become the minority, but Americans in general are being marginalized long-term all for personal power.

I do not know of anyone who is pro-life who would object to an abortion in rape or incest. Yet these things are thrown down our throats as if they are the entire reason for ABORTION when they are rarely encountered. I had an assistant many years ago who was pregnant and had an abortion when she was young and ended up not being able to have children after that. I had another assistant who was married and ended up divorced because she was told that she could not have children. She ended up pregnant from a one-night sand and did not know where the father went. Because of society, she thought she should have an abortion and I talked her out of it that society does not matter, she always want a child and did. I raised my two kids alone, which was why she confided in me.

US Population Growth 1950 2024
Population Growth 1950 2022

Some have argued that flooding Europe and America with aliens is also because our pension system is based on Ponzi schemes. In other words, the assumption that the next generation will always be larger than the previous, and thus taxing the next generation to pay for the previous was the model. But when the birthrate collapses, the entire pension scheme will crumble. So they have let these people in for tax purposes; others say they need them because of their intentions to invade Russia, but at the end of the day, their culture is at odds with our own, and that means that these actions will ensure the decline and fall of Western culture and the Financial Capital of the World will indeed move to China posted 2032.

Augustus Plaque ITALIAN_Reggio_Emilia_._ca_1550_15

This whole thing about abortion is nothing more than the Gates/Rockefeller agenda of reducing the world’s population. Nothing is investigated dispassionately, and the population has always been rising and falling. In fact, the birth rate always declines with economic prosperity. That’s why the first Roman Emperor Augustus (27BC-14AD) instituted his famous family laws and punished bachelors for not getting married. You were prejudiced from rising politically if you did not have children. That was the reaction to the declining birth rate in Roman History. If these people would study history, they would see there is a cycle to everything and nothing is new.

Augustus and daughter Julia Denarius

Augustus even banished his own daughter Julia for her promiscuity.

The history of birth control pre-Christianity was very different, for abortion had none of the stigma in most cultures. There are even surviving documents from ancient Egypt concerning birth control and abortion. The Ebers Papyrus from 1550 BC describes the use of honey, acacia leaves, and lint to be placed in the vagina to block sperm. The Kahun Papyrus from 1850BC described birth control methods using contraceptive devices and the use of acacia gum, which has confirmed spermatocide qualities and today is still used in contraceptive jellies.

Cyrenen Birth Control AR Didrachm 294 275BC

Sep 22 2024

Ziegler Exposes Democrats For “Changing History” With Revised Retelling Of Hunter Biden’s Shakedown


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Sep 21, 2024 at 01:00 pm EST

Sep 20 2024

Tim Hinchcliffe Breaks Down What The UN’s Global Digital Compact And Digital Control


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Sep 10, 2024 at 07:00 pm EST

Sep 20 2024

Noor Bin Ladin Breaks Down Why The Globalists Are Pushing For Censorship World Wide


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Sep 19, 2024 at 07:00 pm EST

Sep 20 2024

HUD Explores Cash over Housing Vouchers


using Vouchers

Posted originally on Sep 20, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

socialism.meme_

The Department of Housing and Urban Development is toying with the idea of providing American renters cash aid instead of vouchers. Current vouchers only demand that tenants pay 30% of their income on rent, while the US taxpayers foot the rest of the bill. The department says it is still too difficult for would-be tenants to use these vouchers and would like to provide them with cash to use as they see fit.

Pilot programs are appearing across America. Philadelphia swapped out vouchers with cash for 300 renters across the city. Since the government is incapable of efficiently running these smaller programs, the waitlist for housing vouchers in Philadelphia overwhelmed the city to the point that it was shut down for a decade. Those in the pilot program earn under 50% of the local median income with a child under the age of 15. Not only is their portion of rent reduced to 30% of income, but the government has provided them with debit cards to cover the additional portion of rent. Technically, they can spend it however they see fit.

Housing development agencies say cash is preferable to vouchers as landlords bypass discrimination laws and are more likely to reject potential tenants who use government vouchers. If someone has a business, does it not make more sense that they would be hesitant to partner with someone who they know cannot pay? Advocates believe “red tape” items like unit inspections are causing delays. Advocates also insist that providing cash will directly will help these people move to safer neighborhoods, neighborhoods where the residents work and pay their share of taxes into the system. These people insist that everything should be done to provide for those who remain underemployed or underemployed without addressing the root problem.

Over 2 million Americans currently receive housing vouchers funded by taxpayers who are already struggling to house themselves, and over 12.9% of Americans receive some form of government assistance. Housing debt far surpasses any other for the majority of US households. That 2 million figure DOES NOT account for the 11+ illegal migrants and counting who the American taxpayers must also shelter. The US government is overtly incentivizing people NOT to work at this point. Why work a low-skill job when you can sit back and collect far more than you would from a paycheck? Why work toward a higher-paying career when you’re being handed cash with no strings attached? Why believe in the union of marriage when you’re paid more to have children out of wedlock? There is no emphasis on personal financial responsibility in the current system, as socialism relies on everyone sharing the burden of poverty.

Sep 20 2024

Harris Admits She Does Not Respect the Second Amendment


Posted originally on Sep 20, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

They say it’s a conspiracy or exaggeration at best to claim the Democrats want to decimate the Second Amendment. The left talking points claim that they merely want to curtail access to guns, but resurface interviews prove that is simply not the case. Kamala Harris admitted that she believes authorities should have access to citizen’s private residences to “check to see if they’re being responsible” with firearms.

Second Amendment

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

Fourth Amendment

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

Unconstitutional

Encoded in the United States Constitution is the ability to bear arms. Our Bill of Rights clearly dictates that the government may not infringe upon our rights as American citizens to bear arms. Elsewhere, the Constitution forbids illegal searches and seizures. Yet, this is precisely what we could expect under a Harris presidency.

“We’re going to require responsible behaviors among everybody in the community, and just because you legally possess a gun in the sanctity of your locked home doesn’t mean that we’re not going to walk into that home and check to see if you’re being responsible,” Harris once said in 2007 when acting as district attorney of San Francisco.

Did she not attend law school? Harris claims she herself owns a fire arm, but per usual, rules for thee and not for me. Even far-left Governor Newsom called these measures extremes. “We’re not going to knock on everybody’s door, we’re not going to break in and inspect,” Newsom once said when questioned about gun regulation. Harris disagreed and said that these extreme measures would benefit the government in encouraging “certain types of behavior.” ‘When we create laws, it’s not only about creating an opportunity, if you will, to prosecute someone for committing a crime, but more importantly, when we legislate our values, it’s about trying to encourage certain types of behavior,” she said.

Harris does not respect American freedoms provided by the Constitution. Straight from the horse’s mouth, Harris believes LEGAL gun owners should live in fear of Big Brother barging in their home at any moment, violating both the Second and Fourth Amendments. She does not respect the First Amendment for free speech and likely will tie in “misinformation” with those “shared values” that permit the government to determine who may and may not defend themselves.

Sep 19 2024

Supplemental Poverty Measure on the Rise


Posted originally on Sep 19, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

poverty

The latest Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM) found that at 12.9% of American households currently rely on government assistance, up from 12.4% one year prior. The figure was at 11.8% in 2019 and has risen every year under Biden-Harris. The data only factors in US households and not the tens of millions of illegal aliens who also rely on US government handouts.

Around 42.8 million Americans were in poverty in 2023, up from pre-pandemic levels of 38.3 million. We saw poverty levels decreased during 2020 and 2021 when the US government was providing nearly everyone with some sort of assistance to combat wages lost from COVID lockdowns. Those measures simply contributed to inflation and made it harder for those in poverty to move on without government aid.

The SPM factors in tax credits, noncash benefits, social insurance, and market income minus nontax expenses. If only factoring in market income net of necessary expenses, the number of Americans in poverty swiftly rises to 77.8 million. Social insurance programs are now factored into these resources so the data has declined by 28 million, and the addition of SNAP and noncash benefits reduced the figure by another 6.6 million. This certainly does not mean there are less impoverished people living in the wealthiest nation in the world.

Data can be manipulated easily to portray a strong economy. Simply put, more Americans have fallen into economic decline in recent years under Bidenomics. The data would be unbelievable if they actually took into account the migrants who are also living on government aid, and receiving more in aid than Americans citizens who paid into the system.

Sep 18 2024

Ford Files Patent to Spy on Drivers


Posted Sep 18, 2024 By Martin Armstrong | 

Governments are pushing the public to switch to smart vehicles to reduce fossil fuel consumption, but there is also a second motive – surveillance.

This September, Ford filed a new patent to eavesdrop on riders. They plan to share this information with third-parties to personalize the advertisements riders hear. Ford will also take the driver’s destination into consideration to determine location-specific advertisements and suggestions. The technology will factor in the weather, traffic, and all external sensors to fine tune when and what to market to passengers.

Advertisements are perhaps the least ominous use of voice data based on the plans that these car manufacturers have. Car insurance rates in the United States spiked 26% in the past year, which is partly due to car manufacturers sharing ride data with insurance companies. Even older cars with basic features like OnStar have tracking devices that report your driving behavior to the manufacturers who share your data with insurance companies and, ultimately, the government. LexisNexis, which tracks drivers’ behaviors and compiles risk profiles, has been sharing individual data with General Motors, who passes that information along to the insurance companies. General Motors.

One driver demanded that LexisNexis send him his personal report, which was a 258-page document containing every trip he or his wife took in his vehicle over a six-month period. LexisNexis said that this data will be used “for insurers to use as one factor of many to create more personalized insurance coverage.” They even reported small issues such as hard breaking and rapid acceleration, according to the report. “I don’t know the definition of hard brake. My passenger’s head isn’t hitting the dash,” an unnamed Cadillac driver enrolled in the OnStar Smart Driver subscription service told reporters.

“Cars have microphones and people have all kinds of sensitive conversations in them. Cars have cameras that face inward and outward,” a researcher with Mozilla Foundation told the Los Angeles Times. In fact, 19 automakers in 2023 admitted that they have the ability to sell your personal data without notice. Law enforcement may subpoena these records as well.

Ford claims that the patent was submitted, but they do not necessarily plan to use the technology. “Submitting patent applications is a normal part of any strong business as the process protects new ideas and helps us build a robust portfolio of intellectual property. The ideas described within a patent application should not be viewed as an indication of our business or product plans. No matter what the patent application outlines, we will always put the customer first in the decision-making behind the development and marketing of new products and services,” Ford said in a statement released to MotorTrend.

Now, the US Department of Transportation is permitted to mandate that certain manufacturers provide them with vehicle data. Sens. Ron Wyden of Oregon and Edward Markey of Massachusetts testified that all vehicles in the United States with a GPS or emergency call system are collecting travel data that car manufacturers have remote access to via the computer chips. The computer chips are compiling data on vehicle speed, movement, travel, and even using exterior sensors and cameras to record the vehicle’s location.

All of this violates the Fourth Amendment which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures without probable cause. These car manufacturers are surpassing what anyone would consider a reasonable expectation of privacy. Governments, third-party advertisement companies, and insurance companies all have warrantless access to personal data, and drivers are largely unaware they are being spied on. Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act permits the government to have backdoor access to this data.

The aforementioned senators’ concerns fell on deaf ears at the Federal Trade Commission. The Department of Transportation clearly is not listed within the US Constitution. People are already experiencing stiff consequences from autos sharing data with the sharp uptick in insurance rates. Our freedom of movement is under attack. Our data has become more valuable than gold. The legal implications fall under a grey area as the Founding Fathers never expected their newly created government to turn against their own citizens.

Sep 17 2024

Countries Grow Weary of United Nations


Posted originally on Sep 17, 2024 by Martin Armstrong

UNFavorability2024

The majority has always accepted the United Nations as a world governing force. Sentiment may be changing according to a new Pew Research Center survey that found support for this global conglomerate waning across the globe.

Of the 35 countries surveyed, 58% still have positive sentiments about the organization, but 31% see it as a negative power. Unsurprisingly, nations in the Middle East, like Israel, no longer support the alliance, but we are seeing declining confidence everywhere. Israel has long held unfavorable views, with 72% holding unfavorable views of the UN; 82% of Jewish Israelis now harbor resentment for the UN compared to 53% of Arab Israelis. Support among Israelis has fallen by 21% in the past year, and of course, the reason goes without saying.

Yet, this phenomenon has expanded everywhere, with over half the people in Japan, Greece, Tunisia, and Turkey falling out of favor with the organization. Support for the United Nations fell by 10 points in the United Kingdom, with 62% of Brits seeing the organization favorably compared to 72% one year ago. Mexico, South Africa, and France all experienced a 9% drop in confidence, with Germany down by 8% and South Korea, America, and Australia all reporting a 5% drop. Only Hungary (15%) and Argentina (6%) expressed increasingly positive views.

United Nations 2

Perhaps the people no longer see the United Nations as a neutral entity meant to play peacekeeper among nations. The world is waking up and realizing that this organization is rapidly growing in power and attempting to form a one-world government. The majority of those in the West have seen their leaders heed domestic policy in favor of international at the insistence of the United Nations, which partners with other global conglomerates like NATO to impose laws on citizens in nations where they simply have no jurisdiction.

The United Nations displayed the extent of their power during the COVID pandemic, and now are championing climate change initiatives and continually calling for governments to submit to their direction. This organization is pushing for the Great Reset with its Agenda 2030.

The International Monetary Foundation (IMF) has been spearheading the push to replace the sovereignty of individual states with a UN-backed global authority that will control everything from our digital identities to the direction nations take in war and trade. Then, they argue that nation-states should begin paying taxes to this entity over individual governments. According to our models, the United Nations, as we know it, will come to an end by 2031 following the old League of Nations.

Sep 13 2024

Essex Police Employs Biometric AI Data!


Posted originally on Sep 13, 2024 by Martin Armstrong |

Those in Essex, England, may have recently seen facial recognition trucks driving through the streets discreetly compiling data. England has long employed CCT cameras to capture criminal activity, but police in Essex are now using advanced biometric data to track each and every citizen.

Essex is using Corsight AI biometric software for its civilian monitoring program. The company has expanded its services across the world. “Our mission is to radically enhance the world of facial recognition technologies while holding ourselves to the highest ethical standards in personal privacy protection,” the Israel-based company states on its website. They can embed their software within existing cameras and track down individuals based on their biometric data.

Biometric Police Enforcement System9

The ethics behind such measures present a challenge. Who has access to this wealth of data? Individual organizations in the UK must obtain permission and be transparent about their policies, but no such restrictions exist for the government. We have seen countless data breaches in recent years, with independent hacker groups infiltrating every supposedly secure data center. Civil liberties groups believe the government is infringing upon human rights by spying on their every move, but governments no longer permit individual freedoms.

The last significant law that was passed surrounding these measures was in 2018 when the UK put forth the Data Protection Act that details how personal data may be collected, processed, and protected by law. Naturally, the government claims that they are only collecting data for public safety and will not misuse the technology. The law remains vague and technology has certainly advanced since 2018.

Yet, the UK is calling Corsight AI a victory and citing clean-cut arrests made using the technology. “In Southend, there were also five positive alerts, which resulted in two arrests—one for harassment and one for sexual assault,” police stated. Police claim that Corsight AI is primarily monitoring known offenders, people on watchlists, and “protected vulnerable individuals at risk of harm.” The program claims it “almost instantly” deletes user data if they do not meet the aforementioned criteria.

“Our live facial recognition technology is used to locate people we want to speak to in connection with ongoing investigations and to manage people with court orders or conditions. Criminals cannot think they can walk around our communities without being caught,” claimed Assistant Chief Constable Andy Pritchard calls Essex Police.

UK Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner Fraser Sampson admits that private companies will have access to user data. “We, the people, are now using sophisticated surveillance tools once the preserve of state intelligence agencies, routinely and at minimal financial cost,” he writes. “We freely share personal datasets – including our facial images – with private companies and government on our smart devices for access control, identity verification and threat mitigation. From this societal vantage point it seems reasonable for the police to infer that many citizens not only support them using new remote biometric technology but also expect them to do so, to protect communities, prevent serious harm and detect dangerous offenders.”

All of this is based on the premise that the government is there to protect citizens rather than treating everyone like a potential criminal.

Other nations will soon adopt this technology that was once reserved for warzones. Israel is using the program in its hospitals to identify deceased victims from the war with Hamas. The Mall of America has employed the service to deter shoplifting but public surveillance measures in the US have been met with a pushback. Paris used the AI service to monitor the crowds at the Olympic games.

The government must tighten its grip on the public as we move into 2032. We have seen the government take tyrannical measures to restrict freedom of speech both in person and online. Now, governments want to track their citizens’ movements, and the public has no say in the matter.

, governments want to track their citizens’ movements, and the public has no say in the matter.