I support this petition which is to give students a break that they need


I agree that we have to make the student loan dis-chargeable again in the bankruptcy court. This petition, below, needs 150 signatures to get the attention of the White House. The economics of higher education are in crisis: tuition’s are soaring, with increases in college and school costs outpacing inflation students are exiting college and graduate school more indebted than ever has transformed student loans into the largest source of consumer indebtedness after mortgages. To make matters worse, all of this comes as the value of higher education is being called into question. With returns sinking and tuition’s, indebtedness, and defaults surging, the need for higher education financial reform is pressing. Students are unlikely to be able to repay, and § 523(a)(8) of the Bankruptcy Code exacerbates the effects of such burdensome debt by allowing private and federal student loans to be discharged only upon a showing of “Undue Hardship.” Please sign this petition.

We the people should ask the Congress to repeal 11 USC § 523(a)(8), which the statute states that “unless excepting such [student loan] debt from discharge under this paragraph would impose an undue hardship on the debtor and the debtor’s dependents.” This is the petition: You now have 30 days to get 99,999 signatures in order for your petition to be reviewed by the White House. Until your petition has 150 signatures, it will only be available from the following URL and will not be publicly viewable on the Open Petitions section of We the People:

Student Loan Petition to White House


Student Loan

REQUEST:  Dear Mr. Armstrong: I am trying to discharge student loan in the bankruptcy court, and it is very tough battle. I am in the situation that it is all out war with the U.S. Department of Education. I have been reading your blog for more than a year now and found that we have common grounds. I agree that we have to make the student loan dischargeable again in the bankruptcy court. I humbly and respectfully request for your help to promote my petition to the White House that We the people should ask the Congress to repeal 11 USC § 523(a)(8), which the statute states that “unless excepting such [student loan] debt from discharge under this paragraph would impose an undue hardship on the debtor and the debtor’s dependents.” This is the petition I created recently: You now have 30 days to get 99,999 signatures in order for your petition to be reviewed by the White House. Until your petition has 150 signatures, it will only be available from the following URL and will not be publicly viewable on the Open Petitions section of We the People:

REPLY: I will sign your petition. I would point out that this was pay-back from the Clintons to the bankers. The logic was that a student has no collateral, so eliminate bankruptcy protection. The Clintons agreed.  Then the bankers still wanted parents to cosign. Thus, this was the greatest fraud that the Democrats pulled off to help the bankers and eliminate bankruptcy protection for even the parents.

Hillary-StudentsBankruptcy in the United States is governed under the US Constitution (Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4) which authorizes Congress to enact “uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States.” To exclude students violate the Due Process clause and Equal Protection Clause. Supreme Court case of Allgeyer v. Louisiana in 1897, the Court came to the conclusion that the Due Process Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment extended to private contracts as well, allowing such liberties as “freedom of contract” to be enforced without the implementation of various social and economic regulations passed by Federal and State governments.

This is discrimination for the government should NOT be allowed to discriminate also against a class of people, not just race or creed. All the students whose teachers allow them to cut class and protest against Trump for his immigration ban for 120 days, would never allow their students to do the same on this issue for schools will not have it so easy if they have to compete for students and provide degrees that are worth something. Forbes Magazine reported that 60% of students cannot find a job in what they paid for.

Therefore, the education system also violates consumer fraud statutes. The definition is: Deceptive practices that result in financial or other losses for consumers in the course of seemingly legitimate business transactions.

I believe there are many grounds to challenge this, but it takes time to get to the Supreme Court, probably 5 years at best. Your petition is a good way to start. It is a shame that these protesters against Trump are so ignorant of the real issues than a 120 ban on immigration.

Fed & Its Balance Sheet


yellen Janet

QUESTION: Mr. Armstrong; At the WEC you said the Fed would allow its balance sheet to eventually shrink, it was trapped and could not sell off its holdings. Yellen seems to have come out and said the same thing. Is this advice you have given in Washington?

XM

ANSWER: What Yellen has said is that the main tool for setting monetary policy would remain the fed funds rate, not shrinking its balance sheet. It cannot shrink its balance sheet right now for that would be deflationary. Yes, she said that the Fed would likely reduce the size of  its balance sheet over time, but it would KEEP reinvesting proceeds from MATURING Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities for now to “maintain accomodative conditions.

This is Yellen confirming what I have warned about. The central banks are trapped. They can NEVER sell the bonds they bought, and the best they could do is allow them to mature. However, that would still be deflationary and result in sending rates higher. Yellen’s comments make it appear that the Fed will raise rates to what it perceives to be a neutral rate before making adjustments to the size of the balance sheet.

yellen-draghi

Therefore, looking at our arrays, it appears the May/June period may be the next target for a rate hike. However, keep in mind that we have the French elections. That can send the dollar rising even more as the Euro caves in. Make no mistake about this. The position of Yellen is responding to the domestic conditions and the breakup of the EU is looking ever more imminent. Therefore, Draghi has been proven to be completely wrong in his attempts to manage the economy of Europe. Instead of creating a recovery, he has deepened the divide and brought the EU to the brink of collapse. Raising rates on Yellen’s party is doing exactly what I warned would unfold. As the dollar strengthens and Europe looks more questionable, the capital flows to the dollar creating the appearance of an asset bubble.

The mainstream media have declared outright war on Trump. The higher the stock market, the more they will turn and blame trump saying he is just making his rich friends richer. This will feed back and compel the Fed to raise rates more to stop the asset bubble, which in turn will attract more capital to the dollar while sending emerging markets over the cliff.

russia-capital-flows-10-13-2016

Welcome to the new exciting world of international capital flows.

Brussels Circumvented the Legal Rights of Citizens in EU


 

EU ParliamentOn January 18, 2017, new rules governing the seizure of bank accounts in the European Union went into effect (The EU Regulation No 655/2014 of May 15, 2014). This regulation sought to circumvent the independent legal rights of people, denying them the right to be heard in a court of law in their own country. This has created a European Account Preservation Order (EAPO) which is to facilitate cross-border debt recovery in civil and commercial matters. The European Commission described the EAPO as a “simple and cost-effective way to block funds that are owed” by a creditor in another member state. What this really means is that a CREDITOR no longer needs to run to an Italian court to sue an Italian debtor. In other words, this order dismembers the sovereignty of the member states legal courts.

Until now, a creditor who is owed money by a debtor in another EU country had to apply to a court in the debtor’s state of residence in accordance with the domestic law of that member state if he wanted to freeze the debtor’s bank accounts. In the Commission’s opinion, this was often too time-consuming and too expensive. In the United States, you still must go after a debtor in their home state and apply by the local laws.

The new European procedure was designed to be quicker, cheaper, and more efficient for creditors, but it then would demand that someone in Italy would have to hire a lawyer in Germany to defend them there. The costs are being shifted to the debtor rather than the creditor under this EAPO.

Basically, it has become possible for your accounts in your bank to be seized domiciled in the European Union doing away with all local legal protection. The danger here is someone in Germany can freeze your bank account in Italy in proceedings commenced in another member state and ex parte – meaning without you even appearing.

Any court of a member state can grant an EAPO, provided that it has jurisdiction to hear the underlying case on its merits under the European Union’s rules on jurisdiction. Therefore, under the Brussels I Regulation Recast, Germany has implemented the EAPO procedure in Sections 946 to 959 German Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO).

There is not even a limitation for the application for a EAPO can be made at any stage of the main proceedings. Therefore, you can be in a court in Italy and a court in Germany can freeze your account in the middle of a litigation or even before main proceedings have been issued, denying you the right to use funds to hire a lawyer. Article 7 (1) of the Regulation reads:

“The court shall issue the Preservation Order when the creditor has submitted sufficient evidence to satisfy the court that there is an urgent need for a protective measure in the form of a Preservation Order because there is a real risk that, without such a measure, the subsequent enforcement of the creditor’s claim against the debtor will be impeded or made substantially more difficult.”

If the application is made before or during proceedings, and no judgment has therefore been obtained yet, the applicant must also show, in accordance with Article 7 (2), that they have a bona fide good case and are likely to succeed on the merits:

“Where the creditor has not yet obtained in a Member State a judgment, court settlement or authentic instrument requiring the debtor to pay the creditor’s claim, the creditor shall also submit, sufficient evidence to satisfy the court that he is likely to succeed on the substance of his claim against the debtor.”

The interesting aspect of this EAPO mechanism is how it actually also creates the right to search for bank accounts of a debtor throughout Europe. Article 14 provides for a request to obtain bank account information:

 “Where the creditor has obtained in a Member State an enforceable judgment, court settlement or authentic instrument which requires the debtor to pay the creditor’s claim and the creditor has reasons to believe that the debtor holds one or more accounts with a bank in a specific Member State, but knows neither the name and/or address of the bank nor the IBAN, BIC or another bank number allowing the bank to be identified, he may request the court with which the application for the Preservation Order is lodged to request that the information authority of the Member State of enforcement obtain the information necessary to allow the bank or banks and the debtor’s account or accounts to be identified.”

However, the EAPO is NOT available in the entire EU. Denmark and Britain have opted out of this Regulation. Ireland is really screwed since they could have opted out, but chose not to do so.

 

Brilliant – Today Illegal Aliens Voluntarily Self-Identify Throughout America – #DayWithoutImmigrants


Some people say the liberal mind is predisposed toward stupidity, or at least stupid behavior.  Perhaps that’s a little too harsh; however, the plan for today is definitely an example of not …

Source: Brilliant – Today Illegal Aliens Voluntarily Self-Identify Throughout America – #DayWithoutImmigrants

 

democrat-party-33

President Trump Holds Roundtable Meeting With Retail Executives (video)…


WASHINGTON (Reuters) – U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday called tax code revisions a critical way to boost the nation’s economy as he kicked off a White House meeting with chief …

Source: President Trump Holds Roundtable Meeting With Retail Executives (video)…

trump-04

LIMBAUGH: What Did Obama Know About Flynn?


Limbaugh Advises Trump Against ‘Shadow Government’: “FULL SPEED AHEAD DOMESTIC AGENDA”


Why Free Speech Is All That Matters


 

The Dow 2-15-2017 – Looking Ahead


DJIND-W 2-15-2017 TEK

A lot of people are scared to jump into the US share market. Some who have been regular investors write: “THIS MARKET SCARES ME!” They are getting vertigo. Yes, the old saying what goes up also goes down is keeping a lot of regular traders seating bullets. They cannot handle these levels and do not want to buy so they keep trying to find the sweet-spot to sell. This rally really has nothing to do with Trump. This is more about people getting really scared outside the USA and are looking to park money.

Those who ask what if Bloomberg or the WSJ reports what we have been saying; Would that cause the market to surge to 23,000 in a day or two? The answer is absolutely no way. Besides, neither Bloomberg nor the WSJ would ever quote our forecasts. So no worries. There is no way they will give us any credit for anything. They must support the bankers and New York City. That is their first and foremost agenda. They have their routine herd of analysts they quote. They are not interested in reporting what we do for then it would beg the question why quote us if the NYC bankers say no way?

That aside, the Dow has rallied to each of our resistance levels and stops there, then it pushes through the next day. There is no indication as of yet that we should expect to reach the 23000 level right now. I have warned we have critical resistance in the 20700 zone and then the mid 21000 zone. We are starting to run out of time right now. That does not mean we do not rally again into the latter part of February about the 27th.

Our critical resistance, to be more precise, is in the 20747 range and that is what we have to get through to see a spike up to the mid 21,000 zone. Tomorrow resistance will be 20658.24 and an opening above that will be strong. Overall, this rally could extend into the 27th. However, that does not mean up every single day. Support tomorrow begins at 20474.62.

DJIND-D FOR 2-15-2017

The timing target for a possible MINOR turning point will be tomorrow the 16th. Thereafter, we have the 21st and 22nd then thereafter the 27th, which should produce the opposite of next week. We have back-to-back Directional Changes for the 20th and 21st. This warns of choppiness next week.

Directional Changes 2016 DOW Congestion

 

Keep in mind that turning points can be either closing or intraday. Moreover, back-to-back Directional Changes typically indicate choppiness. This is how the market responded last year to that wild serious of consecutive Directional Changes. This indicated a highly choppy period that was forming the incredibly important low.