Your #ProgressiveUtopia- #BenGarrisonCartoon with brand new post! This cartoon was published nearly three years ago. It predicted our future, which has now arrived in full, ugly bloom.
America’s Far Left Future!
Category Important
United Nations Now Muscling In on U.S. Police Reform
Meanwhile, for the sake of survival and American sovereignty: ‘Get the U.N. out of America and America out of the U.N’.
Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By Judi McLeod —— Bio and Archives—June 17, 2020
The New World Order ever-seeking United Nations is about to jump, four square, into the U.S. reformation of police force initiatives—politicizing them even further than they already are.
Little known and rarely ever written about, the World’s biggest bureaucracy, by virtue of city mayors and councillors aiding and abetting ‘peaceful’ protesters now holding cities like Seattle hostage, is the biggest player in the globalist fight to defund and even abolish American police forces.
Not only is Seattle a ‘U.N. Agenda 21/30 City-so are some 600—and still counting—other American cities.
(Editor’s Note: The list of 600 or so cities is from a WayBackMachine Archives List because ICLEI (International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives, Local Governments for Sustainability) deleted the link in 2012).
“The United Nations Association – Greater Seattle Chapter is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that supports the work of the United Nations as one of a number of local chapters of the United Nations Association of the United States (UNA-USA). UNA Seattle encourages active civic participation in the most important social and economic issues facing the world today, from global health and human rights to the spread of democracy to equitable and sustainable development. (Idealist.org)
“Our Mission: UNA-GSC is dedicated to educating, inspiring and mobilizing members of the Greater Seattle community to support the principles and vital work of the United Nations and to advocate for full engagement by the United States in the United Nations.”
“Towns and cities—long ago hijacked by the United Nations Agenda 21/2030—have already completed the process and are now owned lock, stock and barrel by the UN without their citizens even being aware of it. (Canada Free Press, June 22, 2019)
“Although it’s now a worldwide trend, the list of ICLEI-controlled cities in the U.S. and Canada is stupendous.”
The inhabitants of some 1,200 cities—600 of them American—do not even know they’ve been hijacked by the UN’s Agenda 21/30.
Without their inhabitants even being aware of it, the UN is as much an enemy to U.S. sovereignty as the European Union is to the sovereignty of European nations.
Agenda 21/30 is hard to nail down. It suits to a ‘t’ the old saying: “It would be like trying to nail jelly to a wall”.
Prominent among the claims that it doesn’t exist is the one defining Agenda 21/30 as “a non-binding resolution not a treaty, which carries no legal authority from which any nation is bound to act. It has no teeth.” (Tom DeWeese).
“Of course Agenda 21 has no teeth, it only has fangs. (Canada Free Press, Aug. 20, 2012)
“A huge part of the problem in trying to fight off ownership by Agenda 21 are the multiple names and descriptions for it and the tons of U.N. paper produced to keep it recycled through the countless bureaucrats in villages, towns and cities.
“A veritable moving target that never goes away, Agenda 21 has more pages and as many clauses as the unread Health Bill known as ObamaCare.
“Some day when historians are sifting through the ashes of what was once the Free West trying to determine what happened, they will discover that freedom was lost through ‘The Agenda That Wasn’t Really There’.
“It was always difficult for the masses to catch on to the game-plan with the U.N. masquerading as ‘Grand Peace Central’.
“Though word leader lemmings and the U.N. have turned citizen suspicion of the all-encompassing Agenda 21 into conspiracy theory, ‘The Agenda That Wasn’t Really There’ is the world’s most clear and present danger.
“As patriots try to define it, the U.N. continues to change it just as the far left keeps moving the goal posts.
“The best definition of Agenda 21 comes right from the U.N. itself. In 1993, the U.N. published ‘Agenda 21: The Earth Summit Strategy to Save Our Planet’:
“Agenda 21 proposes an array of actions which are intended to be implemented by every person on earth…it calls for specific changes in the activities of all people…Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of all humans, unlike anything the world has ever experienced.”
“Written in benign-sounding, Save-Mother-Earth style under the ruse of environmentalism, this major undertaking is the mechanism to confiscate privately held lands; the ironclad means to dictate to people from all walks of life, where they can live, what they can eat and drink, what to drive, and how to heat and light their apartments or homes.
“Agenda 21 is a blight extending over all countries in the world, much worse than the killer flu bugs about which the U.N. through its World Health Organization (WHO) constantly sends out its dire warnings.”
The Agenda’s main focus is currently the United States of America—which incredibly pays the lion’s share of the U.N.’s freight.
Why are world cities marching lemming like toward the edge of the cliff?
“Like a cancer, ICLEI begins to infest the local government policy, training city employees to think only in terms of Sustainable Development, and replacing local guidelines with international codes, rules and regulations.” (Tom DeWeese)
Before muscling in on the globalist fight to defund and abolish American police forces, the UN picked up steam from the Alexandria Ocasio- Cortez-led Green New Deal.
It is more important than ever for Americans to understand what the UN Agenda 21/30 is all about.
Citizens pressed for time can easily navigate their way through the long wordage and deceit of what the UN Agenda 21/30 is all about by clicking on to the Agenda21Course.com Newsletter.
Meanwhile, for the sake of survival and American sovereignty: ‘Get the U.N. out of America and America out of the U.N’.
Lockdowns, tracing, testing, vaccinating, and Liberty
Liberty: “the state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one’s way of life, behavior, or political views; the state of not being imprisoned or enslaved.”
Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By Jon Rappoport — NoMoreFakeNews—— Bio and Archives—June 17, 2020
These are the days. These are the days when men and women accept draconian measures as if they were trifles.The nation and the world come grinding to a halt, and it is just another “interruption.”
In 1776, there was a revolution against restraints from a foreign power. Now there is bleating from domestic governors about lockdowns, tracing, testing, vaccinating, and the majority of the populace obeys these tyrants without question. Even with loyalty.
“What harm could come from a government giving gifts?”
(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)
Birthed after blood and sacrifice, national government in the United States was severely hamstrung, in order to prevent abuses of power. But it has become the teat, the Giver and the Taker. The wanton parent.
And now for decades, people have shrugged: “What harm could come from a government giving gifts?”
People say, “What harm could come from schools that don’t teach history? We already have freedom. Who cares how we got it?”
The exalted nature of Liberty has been disposed of in a sea of amnesia.
“Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. It is not for the sake of a good public administration that it is required, but for security in the pursuit of the highest objects of civil society, and of private life.” (Lord Acton, 1877)
“There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with power to endanger the public liberty.” (John Adams, 1772)
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.” (Samuel Adams, 1776)
“The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion.” (Edmund Burke, 1784)
Does none of this matter now? Are pacification and passivity the cardinal virtues? If so, I suggest a new Constitution, where we can enshrine these qualities with official language and be done with it.
We threw off the King of England so we could have YouTube and Facebook
BILL OF RIGHTS:
ONE: Shout “this is science!” when anyone threatens the power of government.
TWO: Censor dissent for the sake of public safety, according to guidelines laid down by government and corporations. Disrupt the lives of dissenters.
THREE: Give up Liberty when the authorities demand it.
That is all. Done.
We threw off the King of England so we could have YouTube and Facebook.
Exalted Liberty, tossed overboard into a sea of hypnotic assurance.
“Perhaps the enemies of liberty are such only because they judge it by its loud voice. If they knew its charms, the dignity that accompanies it, how much a free man feels like a king, the perpetual inner light that is produced by decorous self-awareness and realization, perhaps there would be no greater friends of freedom than those who are its worst enemies.” (Jose Marti, 1893)
“What light is to the eyes, what love is to the heart, Liberty is to the soul of man. Without it, there come suffocation, degradation and death.” (Robert G Ingersoll, 1887)
If I had a child, I would home school him, and for a year we would do nothing but delve deeply into these and other remembrances of Liberty, re-establishing its exalted nature. For those of you who do have children, that is what I suggest.
An education of mind, body, heart, and soul.
Where Liberty once was
Where Liberty once was.
That creature called socialism is, in effect, the transfer of any remaining Liberty to government, based on the fatuous hope that giving complete power to a tyrannical force will somehow reform that force and transform it into a messiah. And this is the best formulation. A more realistic appraisal would be: socialism is a notorious promoted enslavement, whereby elite men behind a curtain preach Centralized Authority as Kindness and Fairness, in order to raise an army of idealistic ravening wolves who will dispossess the people of everything they own.
Obviously, in order for this operation to succeed, the people must have forgotten that ANY quality of The Individual could occupy an exalted and eternal position—-a quality such as Liberty.
Once upon a time, defiant poetry about Liberty from oppression could move armies. The stakes were as high as they have ever been.
From history.com:
”…General George Washington’s troops were encamped at McKonkey’s Ferry on the Delaware River opposite Trenton, New Jersey. In August, they had suffered humiliating defeats and lost New York City to British troops. Between September and December, 11,000 American volunteers gave up the fight and returned to their families. General Washington could foresee the destiny of a rebellion without an army if the rest of his men returned home when their service contracts expired on December 31. He knew that without an upswing in morale and a significant victory, the American Revolution would come to a swift and humiliating end.”
”…[Thomas Paine’s] Common Sense was the clarion call that began the revolution. As Washington’s troops retreated from New York through New Jersey, Paine again rose to the challenge of literary warfare. With another pamphlet] American Crisis, he delivered the words that would salvage the revolution.”
“Washington commanded that the freshly printed pamphlet be read aloud to his dispirited men; the rousing prose had its intended effect. Reciting Paine’s impassioned words, the beleaguered troops mustered their remaining hopes for victory and crossed the icy Delaware River to defeat hung-over Hessians on Christmas night and on January 2, the British army’s best general, Earl Cornwallis, at the Battle of Princeton. With victory in New Jersey, Washington won not only two battles, but also the love and thanks of man and woman.”
“THESE are the times that try men’s souls”
Paine’s famous words:
“THESE are the times that try men’s souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: it is dearness only that gives every thing its value. Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as FREEDOM should not be highly rated.”
Paine wrote more:
”…I have as little superstition in me as any man living, but my secret opinion has ever been, and still is, that God Almighty will not give up a people to military destruction, or leave them unsupportedly to perish, who have so earnestly and so repeatedly sought to avoid the calamities of war, by every decent method which wisdom could invent.”
“Neither have I so much of the infidel in me, as to suppose that He has relinquished the government of the world, and given us up to the care of devils…”
“…in the fourteenth century the whole English army, after ravaging the kingdom of France, was driven back like men petrified with fear; and this brave exploit was performed by a few broken forces collected and headed by a woman, Joan of Arc.”
“…Let it be told to the future world, that in the depth of winter, when nothing but hope and virtue could survive, that the city and the country, alarmed at one common danger, came forth to meet and to repulse it.”
“…Say not that thousands [of soldiers] are gone, turn out your tens of thousands; throw not the burden of the day upon Providence, but ‘show your faith by your works,’ that God may bless you. It matters not where you live, or what rank of life you hold, the evil or the blessing will reach you all. The far and the near, the home counties and the back, the rich and the poor, will suffer or rejoice alike. The heart that feels not now is dead; the blood of his children will curse his cowardice, who shrinks back at a time when a little might have saved the whole, and made them happy. I love the man that can smile in trouble, that can gather strength from distress, and grow brave by reflection. ’ Tis the business of little minds to shrink; but he whose heart is firm, and whose conscience approves his conduct, will pursue his principles unto death….”
The contest is not over. It is never over.
Justice Dept Announces Recommendations for Reform of Big Tech Platform Immunity, Section 230…
Timing is everything…
When NBC published their background conversation with Google yesterday the media outlet made a big legal mistake. NBC not only outlined the mechanics of a racketeering and antitrust violation, via Google’s power to control on-line ad revenue as a weapon to target NBC’s competition, but NBC outlined the actual collaborative communication.
NBC did the worst thing possible, they published the quotes from Google’s response to them where Google willingly accepted the request from NBC without pause. The collusion was not only clear, it was self admitted. What made the issue more explosive was the NBC article explained the motives of both organizations; the targeting was intentional and specific. The goal was to take-down The Federalist news outlet by removing their revenue. There was no ambiguity of purpose, and Google knowingly agreed with the intent.
Within hours of realizing the consequences of the publication, the legal offices of NBC and Google both activated and attempted damage control. The NBC article was completely rewritten and the communication between them and Google –as quoted– was removed. For its part Google published a statement saying no action had been taken, and later they professed no action would be taken. However, the damage was already done.
NBC’s hubris put both Google and NBC in the sunlight of their own admissions.
Google’s monopoly control of internet ad revenue made their agreement with NBC to target a competitor a transparent, and admitted, antitrust violation. Without question, that stark admission is what triggered the timing of the DOJ public statement today.
The DOJ needs congress to take action, modify the law, and update the outdated immunity for online platforms under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996.
There are many aspects to the 230 immunity section regarding the responsibility of a platform provider to ensure no criminal activity (child exploitation, sex trafficking, terrorism organization etc.) is taking place; while 230 simultaneously gives the provider immunity from liability if they do not successfully intercept the action. That was the bulk of intent and purpose of the original law.
Additionally, platform providers have been using the Section 230 immunity to engage in targeted censorship and control over political viewpoints on their services. That’s the part that gets most of our/user attention…. and if the immunity was removed, people could challenge the platform provider, sue them and force them to justify their action in court.
Both of those prior points are important; the first is really important to the DOJ; but they are not the real epicenter of the issue from the perspective of the provider(s).
Big Tech cares about not being held criminally liable, yes; and Big Tech cares about being able to control ideology, yes. However, neither of those two factors are as important to Big Tech as MONEY. Without financial control over the internet, Big Tech collapses.
The heart of the Big Tech’s financial issue for Section 230 immunity surrounds this:
(DOJ) …”A third reform proposal is to clarify that federal antitrust claims are not covered by Section 230 immunity. Over time, the avenues for engaging in both online commerce and speech have concentrated in the hands of a few key players. It makes little sense to enable large online platforms (particularly dominant ones) to invoke Section 230 immunity in antitrust cases, where liability is based on harm to competition, not on third-party speech.”…
As we expected the DOJ wants to target Big Tech for antitrust violations. The issue surrounds commerce, not speech. Demonetization of digital platform content providers, in combination with Google’s control of almost all ad revenue in the digital space, is what has opened the door for DOJ intervention based on antitrust laws.
Antitrust intervention is warranted because the content being generated on these on-line, digital platforms, is being arbitrarily valued by the platform agency GoogleAds and not the free market. When Google devalues content they are ideologically opposed to creates consumer distortions.
The methods, practices and purposeful control of value; through collusion of corporate interest specific to a planned and organized effort to control monetary benefit; is the part of their activity that is quantifiable, discoverable, easily provable, and ultimately unlawful.
The financial distortion of internet commerce is the crack in the Big Tech stranglehold that should afford the DOJ the opportunity to step in.
DOJ Expanded Reform Proposal Here
Democrats in congress will fight to help Big Tech retain the monopoly. It is doubtful any legislative action will take place prior to the November 2020 election. However, if President Trump can win reelection and if Democrats can be defeated in the House and Senate, it’s possible this might finally be addressed…
But remember…. Big Tech will go to the mattresses this year to try and help Democrats. There are trillions at stake.
President Barack Obama joins a toast with Technology Business Leaders at a dinner in Woodside, California, Feb. 17, 2011. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)
Builders and Destroyers: The 2020 Battle for America
There are two kinds of people in this world – builders and destroyers. Be a builder and reject the destroyers in November.
Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By Linda Goudsmit —— Bio and Archives—June 16, 2020
There are two kinds of people in this world – builders and destroyers. You know who you are.
Our forefathers were builders who rejected monarchy in favor of limited government and the challenge of self-rule. Our forefathers understood the difference between servitude and citizenship. They chose freedom and built a more perfect union – a government of the people, by the people, for the people. The building of the United States of America was the most successful experiment in individual freedom and prosperity the world has ever known.
Our forefathers built America with a Constitution articulating its secular laws, and the Ten Commandments articulating its moral laws
Our forefathers built America with a Constitution articulating its secular laws, and the Ten Commandments articulating its moral laws. We are a Judeo-Christian country built on the Judeo-Christian foundation of the Ten Commandments. Let’s examine them.
Commandments 1-4 codify rules for membership in the group, they are the unifying principle of monotheism. Monotheism is at the heart of the Ten Commandments and its moral laws. Freedom and independence require self-respect, self-control, and respect for others. It is a delicate balance that requires maturity and the ability to agree to disagree.
Commandments 5-10 codify the ethos of individualism and respect for others: “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” The Constitution and the Commandments define the balance between self and society, and between the individual and the group. There is no disagreement about the need for mutuality or respect for the individual.
Collectivism is an affront to individualism, adult mutuality, and the morality of Judeo-Christian tradition. Collectivism, whether socialism, communism, Islamism, or globalism, destroys the value of the individual and insists the value of the group takes precedence. The problem, of course, is that even in collectivism the group is made up of individuals!
The humanitarian hoax of collectivism is the destruction of the individual. Socialism is the destructive democrat party platform being marketed as altruism. Radical blue state Democrat leaders are telling the citizens of their states that anarchy, looting, robbery, rape, murder, and mayhem perpetrated by destroyers will bring equality and social justice. It is a lie. Anarchy precedes tyranny.
We still have the choice between builders and destroyers in November. We can choose between ordered liberty or the Seattle CHAZ—Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone that has become the country’s first No-Go zone. The radical Democrat destroyers support anarchy and the defunding of police departments, but without law enforcement there is only anarchy. Ask yourselves, “Do you want to live in the anarchist country of CHAZ?”
CHAZ is the predicted escalation of radical Democrat sanctuary cities and sanctuary states that protect criminals at the expense of law-abiding citizens
CHAZ is the predicted escalation of radical Democrat sanctuary cities and sanctuary states that protect criminals at the expense of law-abiding citizens. In CHAZ the criminals have taken over the government. This is how violent revolutions begin. This is what the radical Democrat destroyers are offering you in November. Voter beware!
Law-abiding communities, black and white, are builders who want to live the American dream of freedom and equality rooted in American individualism articulated in the Constitution and the Ten Commandments. Law-abiding communities, black and white, reject the destroyers of the radical leftist Democrat party who foment racial divisiveness and religious divisiveness by embracing Antifa anarchists, Black Lives Matter supremacists, and Islamic sharia law supremacists who are all diametrically opposed to the Constitution and the Ten Commandments.
The Democrat hype of the coronavirus pandemic and their support of anarchist pandemonium are both tactical weapons in the radical leftist Democrat war of destruction against America and America-first President Donald J. Trump.
There are two kinds of people in this world – builders and destroyers. You know who you are.
The 2020 presidential election is a battle between builders and destroyers. The outcome will determine if the dreams of our forefathers for a more perfect union of citizenship and individualism prevail, or if the radical Democrat destroyers successfully surrender our country to collectivism and servitude.
Before you cast your vote in November, remember Communist China Premier Zhou Enlai’s dismissive comment, “One of the things about Americans is that they have absolutely no historical memory.” The radical leftist Democrat destroyers are counting on you to forget the millions of people killed in the name of collectivism.
Remember that every group is made of individuals, this means if you choose radical Democrat collectivism you are choosing to destroy your self.
Remember that the ruling elite always take care of the ruling elite. The radical Democrat political party does not represent individualism and American interests. The radical Democrat party leaders are lobbyists for their globalist financiers who fully intend to bring socialism to America in preparation for the internationalized new world order of their globalist bosses.
There are two kinds of people in this world – builders and destroyers. Be a builder and reject the destroyers in November.
United, America Will Survive All Three Phases of Treason
United America Will Stand – Not kneel!
Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By Dennis Jamison —— Bio and Archives—June 16, 2020
Treason and tyranny are ancient and succeed due to deception and ignorance based upon lies and mental laziness. However, tyranny endures well in a culture of fear due to viable threats, the demonstration of physical force, and outright violence. What Americans and the entire world are seeing in this time is an attempt at overthrowing the United States of America. The worst enemy is the internal enemy because those ones once trusted, are different from who they appeared to be in a different time, or in a different light. America now has to deal with the domestic enemies in our midst whether we want to or not, whether we like it or not.
Treason is as old as the United States of America, although a majority of Americans would not realize it. Treason goes all the way back to the beginning of the nation. While citizens just celebrated Flag Day and the birthday of the U.S. Army, many Americans would likely be shocked to know that U.S. Army officers at the highest levels under George Washington had plotted to take over the infant Republic. The Newburgh Conspiracy is not well known. However, it is reviewable via many historical sources. Top officers who did not share George Washington’s belief that the U.S. should be a free country, intended to seize control of the U.S. Army before General George Washington could disband the troops after the revolution.
The Democrat insurrection built steadily soon after Lincoln won the 1860 election
That treason ended with General Washington. Through a loyal officer, the old general found out about some details of the timeline of the implementation of treasonous actions. He then called a pre-emptive meeting of all his officers, and he essentially talked them out of their dark treachery by appealing to the conscience of each of them, as well as reminding them of a deeper purpose behind the War for Independence. General George Washington is viewed by some historians as the embodiment of the ideals and virtues behind the War. Indeed, he understood that the new nation would no longer abide by the norms of tyranny.
Treason visited the United States once again, although many Americans were not taught about it. Treason led to the near destruction of the fledgling Republic in the days of the American Civil War. It is not well known because there are other aspects of the Civil War that are viewed as having more importance. Yet, evidence of the treason in the White House just after Abraham Lincoln was elected president can be reviewed through various historical sources. The attempt to create a new nation from the old nation was the basic concept, and the propaganda at the time from the Confederate States tried to justify the insurrection as the “Second Revolution.”
Democrats before the elecion of 1860 threatened to secede from the Union if an anti-slavery candidate were elected POTUS. In that time, Southern Democrats had institutionalized racism in their “peculiar institution” of African slavery that they justified in various ways. Christian voices and abolitionists threatened that institution by shedding light on it. Abolitionists were the most vociferous in to eliminate slavery. They saw it as a violation of moral law. The southern slave owners also felt threatened by Abraham Lincoln, and though not an abolitionist, Lincoln was on record as hating slavery.
The Democrat insurrection built steadily soon after Lincoln won the 1860 election. First, South Carolina seceded from the Union. Democrat Governor Gist of South Carolina demanded that President James Buchanan surrender U.S. forts in Charleston Harbor. A second letter dated January 12, 1861, from the newly elected Governor Francis W. Pickens additionally demanded that Buchanan surrender Fort Sumter because, “I regard that possession is not consistent with the dignity or safety of the State of South Carolina.”
More dramatically, treasonous activity surfaced in Buchanan’s White House well before newly elected president Abraham Lincoln was sworn in as president in 1861
Rumors reached president-elect Lincoln in Springfield, Illinois, that President Buchanan had surrendered the federal forts in South Carolina. Reports indicate that when Lincoln heard the rumors, he was purported to have said that if it were true, Buchanan should have been hanged.
Lincoln understood the Constitution. The rumors, however, were unsubstantiated. Nevertheless, southern Democrats in President Buchanan’s cabinet were outraged that Buchanan would not surrender federal forts to Governor Pickens. More dramatically, treasonous activity surfaced in Buchanan’s White House well before newly elected president Abraham Lincoln was sworn in as president in 1861.
Buchanan’s pro-southern cabinet included four men who were substantial slave owners, who sought to undermine Lincoln. But, in undermining Lincoln, they were undermining the nation, as they breached treasonous territory. Democrat John Floyd of Virginia, Secretary of War, made threats to resign if Buchanan refused to hand over federal forts—even in the event that the president would order supplies or soldiers to reinforce the fort against potential insurrection. Posing the possibility, Floyd stated that “It would be an act of aggression against South Carolina which I cannot be a party to; I will resign my office before I will sign such an order.”
Even more treacherous was Secretary Floyd’s diversion of significant arms shipments and military hardware to southern forts. Those forts were seized directly after Fort Sumter fell. Floyd was also suspected of diverting $850,000 out of the U.S. Treasury with a vague excuse of dealing with “Indian affairs.”
Buchanan’s Secretary of the Treasury, Howell Cobb of Georgia, may have assisted Floyd with the disappearance of the huge sum. Cobb eventually resigned in December 1860. Then on February 4, 1861, Cobb became president of the convention of seceded states. Under Howell Cobb’s guidance, southern Democrats drafted a constitution for the Confederate States of America (CSA) and elected Senator Jefferson Davis as provisional president.
Democrat insurrection built steadily soon after Donald Trump won the 2016 election
Floyd and Cobb seemingly did as much damage as possible before resigning. Floyd resigned in a display of self-righteous indignation over Buchanan’s handling of Fort Sumter. President Davis was formally elected to a full six-year term on November 6, 1861 and inaugurated on February 22, 1862. As president of the C.S.A., Davis, called up 100,000 men from the militias in the rebel states, and readied for war.
Such treason successfully led to seizing control of the southern based U.S. Army forts as well as the weapons and munitions. President Davis initiated the war by ordering Confederate forces to seize Fort Sumter. The ensuing war was intended to defend the southern tyranny over their slave populations. However, suspicions indicate that the intent (minus the propaganda) aimed for destroying the Union, which had become an impediment to the expansion of slavery.
Today, Democrat insurrection built steadily soon after Donald Trump won the 2016 election. Trump is a direct impediment to the expansion of the tyranny of the criminal cabal of Democrat leaders, Socialist-Democrats (infant Communists), the Globalists, and some “Never Trumper” GOP elitists. But recently, the target of the political criminal cabal is the hardworking American citizens who trust in Trump.
True Americans are aware. The worst enemy is the internal enemy—the domestic enemy. Treason and the physical force and outright violence of their brownshirt militants like Antifa and the Black Lives Matter group must be met by the unity of the people of conscience. It requires a “top-down and a grassroots-up” response. Trump and true patriots need to continue to shine light upon the dark treasonous endeavors of the domestic enemy.
United America Will Stand – Not kneel!
Civil Unrest in Media & The Supreme Court’s Wrongful Decision
Armstrong conomics Blog/Press
Re-Posted Jun 17, 2020 by Martin Armstrong
There is civil unrest rising within the major media institutions in Europe and the United States including the New York Times, Philadelphia Inquirer, Washington Post just for example. The younger generation journalists are starting to rebel against management for the fake news. What is repeatedly coming out is demands for news organizations’ core value needs to be the truth. They are objecting to what has been the perception of objectivity. Some journalists have simply not written a word for a week. The civil unrest we see in the streets is not really racist as much as it is against the establishment. This was not helped by the Supreme Court’s decision to deny cert to a case on qualified immunity. This decision may go down with Dread Scot which said blacks had no constitutional rights in an effort to prevent a civil war. This decision trying to support the status quo is equally wrong. There is NOTHING in the Constitution that says a government employee is an exception. The Bill of Rights is by no means a list of POSITIVE rights – it is a NEGATIVE restraint upon government. There is no foundation whatsoever to create any immunity for any government office when the sovereign of the nation is “We the People” not the government.
Gates is Funding Seven Factories for his Mandatory Vaccine
Armstrong Economics Blog/Corruption
Re-Posted Jun 17, 2020 by Martin Armstrong
Bill Gates says his foundation is funding the construction of factories for seven coronavirusvaccine candidates. Europe is embracing his agenda where people will not be able to even leave their house without a digital certificate from Gates to prove they were vaccinated. Former Prime Minister Tony Blair is on board with the Gates agenda. Europe is isolating itself from the world for if their own citizens will be restricted in their movement, what hope will there be for a tourist. In Britain, you can leave your house and take a drive, but you must return and are prohibited from staying anywhere else. All of this for a virus they make out to be the Black Death when the death rate is 0.0003% of the population. This is all about redesigning the world economy by deliberately crashing it to destroy all businesses they deem unwanted for the zero CO2 world.
USTR Lighthizer Plans to Outline Renewed Demand for International Tariff Reciprocity…
June 16, 2020
U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer is testifying tomorrow at 10:00am to the House Ways and Means committee; later in the afternoon Ambassador Lighthizer will testify before the Senate Finance Committee.
The New York Times has received an advance copy of USTR Lighthizer’s opening statement, and the liberal publication is apoplectic the Trump administration plans to outline an even more aggressive stance toward the iff’s.
According to the pearl-clutching Wall St. class, Lighthizer is going to inform congress of Trump/USTR plans to demand tariff reciprocity; and Lighthizer will indeed raise tariffs against any nation that continues to attempt one-sided benefit. [EU will go bananas]
One method to approach tariff inequality would be for the U.S. to lower the import value threshold for non-tariff exemptions. Currently the U.S. does not apply import duties to any product valued under $800. This is a great benefit to China, southeast Asia, and U.S. on-line retailers such as ebay and Amazon; however, the zero tariff threshold hurts U.S. manufacturers because China and other nations do not reciprocate.
It is anticipated that USTR Lighthizer will inform congress the U.S. will lower that import threshold to match the same value level applied by other nations. Obviously the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Wall Street multinationals will not like this approach.
WASHINGTON — The Trump administration plans to continue its aggressive trade tactics this year by pushing for a “broader reset” of the tariffs set by the World Trade Organization, a top trade official plans to tell Congress in testimony on Wednesday.
Robert E. Lighthizer, the U.S. trade representative, will tell the House Ways and Means Committee that the tariffs the organization sets for various countries are “outdated” and far above the levels charged by the United States, according to a copy of his prepared remarks.
The United States “must ensure that tariffs reflect current economic realities to protect our exporters and workers,” Mr. Lighthizer’s prepared testimony says.
The remarks suggest that American officials will continue their offensive this year on the World Trade Organization, the international body charged with writing and enforcing trade rules. (read more)
Following the four year pattern of opposition, we can well expect the majority of purchased politicians to stand against the Trump administration efforts. That said, none of the doomsayer tariff predictions ever came true; and President Trump has the support of the majority with him against the United States Congress.
Tucker Carlson Highlights Google’s Ideological Control and Congressional Inaction…
June 16, 2020
In his opening monologue today Fox host Tucker Carlson took on the subject of Google and their control over 70% of all on-line advertising revenue. Within the very accurate segment, Carlson noted that Utah Senator Mike Lee is in charge of the antitrust subcommittee and yet does nothing, absolutely nothing, to stop the authoritarian demonetization and deplatforming action carried out through the monopoly Google holds.
No single issue will do more damage to the reelection efforts of President Trump than allowing Google to carry out their political agenda. However, that accepted, that’s also the motive for the Senate and DOJ to do nothing. This is a good, honest and painful segment:
Centinel2012 