Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By A. Dru Kristenev —— Bio and Archives—June 23, 2020

Cover Story | 

 Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

The line has been crossed. Government guidelines have overtaken and undermined the Hippocratic Oath to do no harm. Medical professionals need to read it again.

We knew it was coming when the institution of the fascist Obamacare – the Affordable Healthcare Act went far beyond its socialist boundaries – compelled medical personnel to make impertinent and unrelated lifestyle queries, gun ownership among them.

The overblown response to the WuFlu coronavirus has ushered in another chapter of data collection and regulation

The overblown response to the WuFlu coronavirus has ushered in another chapter of data collection and regulation that is being used to restrict the rights of citizens, and it’s infected even the most conservative states.

Weaponizing emergency, urgent care and hospital policy was a major step. Entrance into these facilities requires mandatory temperature reading, donning a facemask (proven to be useless against the spread of the disease) before an employee will tend to the visitor.

Recent events have shown that the CDC has pressured doctors and nurses to view every potential patient as a Covid-19 carrier, disregarding the individual’s complaint as superfluous. Personnel are armed with a sketchy list of possible WuFlu symptoms that could describe seasonal allergies to heartburn, and the first thing done by healthcare workers is insist that the patient be tested, which they are still free to refuse. Refusal, however, is close to becoming a black listing. Don’t be surprised when rejecting a test will brand the individual as a danger to society. Dictatorial states like Washington have already implemented contact tracing, where “trained interviewers” knock on doors and take names.

The objective behind pressuring individuals to be tested is to boost case numbers in order to validate the overreaching regulations being implemented by government agencies. Should the individual refuse to be tested? That’s hardly an obstacle. Medical professionals are being directed to report “probable” infections based on the catchall list of symptoms.

Personal encounters with individuals who have been victimized by these policies have occurred twice in the last week.¹ Visits to urgent care for already diagnosed problems unrelated to Covid-19 resulted in nurses and doctors disregarding the complaints of the patients and redefining the symptoms as probable WuFlu cases without hearing or considering the patient’s history or actual complaint.

It was a nonsensical determination since the woman had been at home with her disabled husband for the last few months having little contact with the public. The facts did not deter the nurse practitioner from insisting the patient was a likely Covid case.

The patient’s husband had just been admitted into the hospital for atrial fibrillation (AFib), and it was necessary that she stay with him as the only one who could interpret his needs after a stroke had impaired his ability to communicate. On the grounds that just being tested for the coronavirus would prevent her from entering the hospital for three days to assist her husband, she refused a test. She was at urgent care to receive a remedy for post-nasal drip, not an upper respiratory ailment.

That did not stop the NP from overstepping her bounds by completely disregarding the actual symptoms of the patient and reporting the woman to the hospital as a potential Covid case.

What this medical employee did, and this is not the only report received of irresponsible behavior by healthcare workers, was create undue emotional distress and hardship for the couple by attempting to bar the woman from attending her sick husband who had no other advocate. That NP and the policies of the hospital placed his life in danger because the healthcare workers on staff weren’t able to fully understand him. If the woman had not managed to get herself up to his room before the NP called in the unsubstantiated report to the nurses station, the woman would have been refused entry, preventing proper care for her husband. In fact, the nurse supervisor attempted to eject the woman from the hospital at 12:30 a.m. The supervisor was unsuccessful because the wife did not have transportation available at that late hour but the hospital did boot her from her husband’s room the next day and has since denied her re-entry. (Update: the husband was just diagnosed with cancer and she is still being locked out of the hospital for suffering seasonal allergies.)

Rush to restrict free movement of individuals

Situations like this are becoming commonplace amid the rush to restrict free movement of individuals, unless they happen to be participating in Antifa protests spawning murder and destruction as in Seattle’s “CHOP.”

It’s become imperative for individuals to arm themselves with the real facts about Covid-19: that the mortality rate is .1% of cases diagnosed; that testing positive is not indicative of resultant illness nor does it require vaccination; that the virus is not that easily spread and that the vast number of false positives and reports of probable cases is far beyond the actual numbers. Dr. Deborah Birx said publicly that the numbers are inflated by approximately 25%.

What is true is that the pandemic is an epidemic of government repression focusing on tracking individuals in their activities (if they tend toward freedom of conservative speech and religious expression) and confine them to living separate, censored lives. This is the only way the progressive agenda can press ahead. Inexcusably, too many republican officials and administrators accept the propaganda, ignoring their constitutional duty and becoming accessories to creeping tyranny.

Recommendation? Refuse testing for the virus. The vast number of false positive results make it of no use. Refuse vaccination when it is finally offered for being ineffective. Vaccines have proven to infect individuals more often than protect them against viruses. Do not relent from speaking out against ineffective, vain regulations being forced upon individuals under the guise of seeking a cure.

The only cure available to a free society is to adamantly maintain our mobility and freedom to conduct business without social limits, gather with friends in public and worship without constraints.

This nation was designed to protect and defend commerce, unrestricted speech and religious pursuits, never to suppress liberty.

1. Names will not be divulged as formal complaints are in the process of being filed.