Media Staging Coup To Crash Stock Market to Undermine Trump


Posted originally on Apr 9, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

NY Time Trump Tariff Cause Crash

COMMENT: The media including the financial media really going crazy with this Trump Tariff thing – as if the market wasn’t due for a pull back.

DS

DJIND M Tech 3 29 25
DJIND M Array 10 24 24

REPLY: We had forecast that we would see a correction by April last year. I answered plenty of questions on various podcasts about whether this would be a big crash and the end of the bull market. I consistently warned that such a scenario was absurd, for that implied the classic flight to quality being government debt. Facing a global sovereign debt crisis, I warned that it was just not realistic. The press has latched onto this normal correction and is deliberately trying to crash the market with constant claims that tariffs will destroy the world economy.

1932 The Evening Journal Wilmington Delaware • Tariffs c aused depression

This is the very same political scheme they used in 1932 to blame tariffs on Hoover and the Republicans to win the 1932 election. It was a total lie and a fabrication of history. We are witnessing the attempted coup of Trump by deliberately trying to force the stock market down in a desperate attempt to turn the Republicans against Trump and stop his entire agenda of ending the Democrats’ feeding trough for corruption. I was stunned by the conversation I had yesterday and a deliberate media attempted coup.

Tariffs do not cause a DEPRESSION, no matter how much the media is selling that story now, just as the Democrats did in 1932 to get FDR elected. They also failed to protect any country from the effects of the worldwide depression at the time.

Between 1925 and 1929, there were 33 general revisions or substantial tariff changes, nearly all of which raised tariffs. These included 26 European nations and 17 republics of Latin America. In 1927 and 1928, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand increased and expanded the scope of their tariffs. In Asia, China, Persia, and Siam also raised tariffs during the period.
This was all before the 1929 Crash, which the history books omitted along with the 1931 Sovereign Defaults.

Sugar Yearly 1861 1932

The Smoot-Hawley Tariff of 1930 was in response to the protectionism before 1929. During World War I, obviously, capital moved to the USA, as was the case for production, and also to Latin America. It was World War I that ended the sugar production that used to take place in Europe. It migrated to Java, Cuba, and other South American countries. You can see the huge spike in sugar during 1919/1920. After the war, the Europeans tried to bring back their economic dominance to recover their former glory. To try to achieve that, this was the start of the high tariffs that were really imposed against new competitors. That was the real essence of the trade war. Their high tariffs succeeded and brought sugar production back to Europe. The output during 1927-1928 was actually far greater than before the war in 1914.

The Europeans did the same with Cotton and wheat. This had the effect of creating overproduction, for which Europe lost export markets. This was the protectionist agenda that is rarely, if ever, explained beyond blaming the Smoot-Hawley Act.

There was a Tariff Reduction Bill of 1932, but this did not pass Congress. Here’s the breakdown:

  1. Context: After the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act (1930) raised tariffs to record levels, worsening the Great Depression, efforts were made to reverse this protectionist policy. By 1932, Democrats, who generally favored lower tariffs, controlled the House but not the Senate (which remained Republican until March 1933).
  2. Legislative Efforts: Democratic lawmakers proposed tariff reduction bills in 1932, but they faced significant opposition. The Republican-controlled Senate and President Herbert Hoover, a protectionist, opposed lowering tariffs during an economic crisis.
  3. Outcome: No major tariff reduction legislation was passed by both chambers of Congress in 1932. The pivotal shift came later with the Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act (1934) under President Franklin D. Roosevelt, which empowered the executive to negotiate tariff reductions.

In summary, despite the post-Smoot-Hawley backlash, the political landscape in 1932 prevented tariff reduction bills from passing Congress, as the Democrats were using this as an excuse to vote for FDR. The focus on austerity and revenue-raising measures (e.g., the Revenue Act of 1932) further sidelined such efforts.

The entire Tariff Issue of the 1930s was indeed just political. The Democrats used it to beat the Republicans over the head and pretended that the Tariffs caused the Great Depression. Today, we have the media, which hates Trump as they all tried so hard to defeat him, now they are deliberately blaming tariffs all over again for a normal correction that many kept call for a major crash before tariffs.

Commission President von der Leyen Coordinates EU Tariff Response with China


Posted originally on CTH on April 8, 2025 | Sundance

After previously saying her number one concern about President Trump’s tariff program was Beijing dumping all their excess products into the EU at a discount, EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announces she is coordinating the tariff response with China.

Apparently, the EU recognizes the ideological alignment of support from Canada just isn’t going to be enough to pressure President Trump and retain leverage into the U.S. market.  This is quite a remarkable admission from von der Leyen all things considered.  [STATEMENT]

President von der Leyen held today a phone call with Premier Li Qiang to discuss the state of EU-China relations, as 2025 marks the 50th anniversary of diplomatic ties.

The two leaders held a constructive discussion during which they took stock of bilateral and global issues.

The President underscored the vital importance of stability and predictability for the global economy. In response to the widespread disruption caused by the US tariffs, President von der Leyen stressed the responsibility of Europe and China, as two of world’s largest markets, to support a strong reformed trading system, free, fair and founded on a level playing field.

The President called for a negotiated resolution to the current situation, emphasising the need to avoid further escalation.

President von der Leyen emphasised China’s critical role in addressing possible trade diversion caused by tariffs, especially in sectors already affected by global overcapacity. The leaders discussed setting up a mechanism for tracking possible trade diversion and ensuring any developments are duly addressed. (more)

In the 2017 – 2019 version of the same dynamic, the EU was slow to realize the Trump impact to the Chinese economy would lead to less industrial purchases from Beijing.  This dynamic pushed the EU toward recession. In 2025 von der Leyen is trying to proactively mitigate that outcome.

This coordination of response between Brussels and Beijing is happening simultaneous to the Chinese central bank beginning a rapid devaluation of their currency.  Direct subsidies and currency manipulation are the first two approaches taken by any economy dependent on access to the U.S. market.

The difference this time is the scale of the tariffs President Trump is delivering.  There’s no way to subsidize and lower currency value at a rate significant enough to mitigate a near 50% tariff impact across all sectors.  China and the EU will subsidize and devalue, but they cannot repeat their prior defensive programs to this scale.

The key takeaway from this public admission by the EU President is to note how consequential the tariffs are to their parasitic endeavors.

The EU is directly working with Beijing against American interests.

Let that alignment settle in for a few moments.

The 2025 Crash?


Posted originally Apr 7, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

1987 Crash Detailed D

COMMENT: My hats off to you if your call for today’s low holds for a few weeks and/or for the year.

I would have thought a retracement to the 62-fibo would have been more likely.

Thank you.
SH

REPLY: As I said on the private blog, back in 1987, I could not find any technical support between the two Weekly Bearish Reversals at 286 in the S&P 500 and the Monthly at 181. That was not the case here, and we did not have an isolated high like in 1987. Here we elected two Weekly Bearish the week of March 24th. The setup was different.

Violent Protesters at UC Davis Attack TPUSA Students and Staff


Published originally on Rumble By Turing Point USA on Apr 5, 2025 at 7:00 pm EST

Kid’s Dad Calls Charlie Kirk a WHITE SUPREMACIST?! 😳


Published originally on Rumble By Turing Point USA on Apr 5, 2025 at 7:00 pm EST

How the Left Is FAILING Women | Charlie Kirk Weighs In


Published originally on Rumble By Turing Point USA on Apr 4, 2025 at 7:00 pm EST

These Girls REFUSE to Be Proud Americans?! 👀


Published originally on Rumble By Turing Point USA on Apr 3, 2025 at 7:00 pm EST

Charlie Kirk vs. Gavin Newsom: Is Higher Education BENEFICIAL or DETRIMENTAL? 🤔


Published originally on Rumble By Turing Point USA on Apr 2, 2025 at 7:00 pm EST

Dunkin Donuts in Chicago Puts Everything Behind Bullet Proof Glass


Posted originally on Rumble By The Salty Cracker on: Apr 6, 2025 at 11:00 pm EST

Ugly Lefty Chicks March Again ReeEEeE Stream 04-06-25


Posted originally on Rumble By The Salty Cracker on: Apr 6, 2025 at 7:32 pm EST