Now if Hillary knows all the questions and had time to prepare and her attorneys can give her answers to give that are not incriminating enough and depending on what else they have this game of the AG meeting Bill might be enough cover to close the case and get her of. Now that would be a shame but it would also show us that there no hope for the politicians in DC they have all betrayed their oath to defend the constitution.
Monthly Archives: July 2016
More Trouble for the EU – Austrian Election Declared a Fraud
Armstrong Economics Blog
Re-Posted Jul 2, 2016 by Martin Armstrong
Austria’s Constitutional court has ordered that the May’s presidential election be completely annulled. A new election must be held because of “particularly serious cases” of voting fraud that was detected in the vote. If the election is not rigged, then we may have another country seek to exit the EU or give them a good scare. There are some currents moving under the surface in the EU. The German Finance Minister Mr Schäuble really wants a treaty between the EU and the UK covering trading rules and other regulations that would restrict Britain from gaining access to the EU’s internal market. His hard-line approach is designed to deter other European countries from leaving the EU. His view, according to sources, he wants to punish Britain to ensure there are no incentives for other member states when renegotiating relations.
However, Mr Schauble also wants to use BREXIT to begin a reform process in the EU for he wants to change the structure for Germany. He too wants to eliminate the EU Commission and introduce a new structure that would then oversee debts, stability and growth of all members and would have greater control to step-in and reject member states’ budget plans. In reality, he was direct control, however, he seems to also want Germany to have some sort of final say on the financial plans of all countries within the Eurozone.
The future remains very much up in the air. The Constitutional Court overturning the Austrian Election may change the game.
Lynch Refuses to even Recuse Herself Proving This is All a Lie
Armstrong Economics Blog
Re-Posted Jul 2, 2016 by Martin Armstrong
The dishonesty never ends. The Attorney General Loretta Lynch has proven she is not trustworthy and playing games. She now says she will accept the recommendations of career prosecutors and the FBI director on whether to charge Hillary Clinton for mishandling emails. But the FBI director is also appointed by Obama and is subordinate to her. She did not say she would publish the FBI report, she simply claimed she would accept it. She refused to recuse herself from the investigation which is mandatory in any such setting. In my own case, when I made it to the Supreme Court, Justice Sonya Satomayor recused herself because she sat on the decision being appealed. It was her separate opinion disagreeing with Judge John Walker that helped to secure my entry to the Supreme Court. Any such connection requires recusal. The fact that Lynch will not recuse herself shows this is a rigged game when in fact she should resign.
She now hopes that if the Hillary wins, she retains her job. So her personal incentive is not to make sure Hillary wins or else she is out of a job.
Let’s make no mistake about this. There no possible way the Democratic Party would allow Hillary to go this far if they were NOT already given the wink and the mod from Obama. The fact that Lynch refuses to recuse proves that she will retain the last word to make sure Hillary is not indicted. This whole system in Washington has become just disgusting.
There should be an independent body to which any petitioner applies to recuse a judge or a government attorney. That should be a panel of 9 independent lawyers from the private sector and ALL lawyers must participate rotating that position. No judge should ever sit in judgment over his own conduct. It is a joke.
In my case, I confronted Judge Richard Owen about changing the transcripts in court inserting and removing words to alter the public record. This was a federal crime. He had to admit publicly to a crime but claimed he never changed anything material. Then he refused to recuse himself. Legally, I had the right to then cross-examine him to determine if what he changed was material. He said he did not, that was it, and refused to answer questions. I appealed to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals and they refused to even docket the appeal. These people can do whatever they want and nobody can do anything. Lynch is playing the same game. She refuses to recuse herself. How can anyone question her whatsoever. She can direct the FBI not to recommend indictment, say that was their conclusion, and never reveal the details.
It is a crime for a citizen to lie to government – just ask Martha Stewart. It is fair game for them to lie to us all the time.
No Sympathy for Kafirs
Brain physiology is such that we feel good when we help others. The Golden Rule, treating others as we would be treated, is hard wired into our physical makeup. However, Mohammed attacked each and every neighbor. Attacking your neighbors is not an expression of the Golden Rule. But, there is no Golden Rule in Islam.
A Kafir is worse than an animal and is hated by Allah. Twelve verses in the Koran say that a Muslim can be friendly to a Kafir, but should never be a true friend. Sympathy allows us to put ourselves in the place of others. This sympathy is outside of Islamic doctrine. In Islamic doctrine those Muslims who are true friends with a Kafir are not truly Islamic.
My personal opinion is that this lack of sympathy for Kafirs is the worst part of Islam. The Koran places barriers between Muslims and Kafir, which violates the idea of humanity being of one spirit.
Snakes On A Plane: Clinton Lynch Meeting – AG Lynch Tries To Clear Up Her Mess…
Now seriously what else would we expect from this administration! They are Democrat’s, Progressives and Attorneys after all; and all three practice the art of Quibbling, miss direction and outright lying!
Hillary: The Most Devious Politician of All Time?
Armstrong Economics Blog
Re-Posted Jul 1, 2016 by Martin Armstrong
QUESTION: Mr. Armstrong; Have you ever met or advised Hillary Clinton?
ANSWER: No. I was asked to meet with Bill when he was first elected in Arkansas after he invited hundreds of people for a dog and pony show. I declined. There is nothing I could advise Hillary on, for it is never about the country; it is just about her. The latest scandal surfacing is her schedule as Secretary of State, which a judge has now ordered must be turned over. Hillary’s scheduled meetings while she was Secretary of State shows she was devious and untrustworthy. At least 75 meetings were identified with longtime loyal donors, corporate contributors, and others that were not recorded in her agenda or were listed with identifying details removed.
Hillary appeared on the central balcony of the New York Stock Exchange in September 2009 to ring the opening bell. Then, minutes later, Hillary attended a private breakfast with influential Wall Street and business leaders. She withheld the identities of those people she met with. These omissions are just the tip of the iceberg of names and events she omitted from her historical record of meetings. This is typical of Hillary who represents the climax of arrogance and corruption among career politicians. These types of people have been getting away with this for so long that they cannot imagine running a government for any reason other than personal gain.
No, there is nothing I would be able to advise her on because she is not interested in the country. It has always been about her being the first woman president and nothing else. It’s all about paying her for favors. There is nothing I need from Hillary.
The Clinton’s Always Play Dirty
Armstrong Economics Blog
Re-Posted Jul 1, 2016 by Martin Armstrong
The Attorney General Loretta Lynch met privately with Bill Clinton on the tarmac in Phoenix. The claim is he just happen to see her plane and hopped on board to speak only about his grandchildren. In the Forecaster, Oliver Brown appeared who had been in charge of the law library in the New York prison. I was told I could not speak to him, visit him, say thank you, or anything, because I could be accused of bribing him to appear in the movie. This is standard legal advice. It made me feel wrong that I could not even say hello, but that is the real world. Here we have two lawyers who know the rules. Clinton met with the Attorney General while she is supposed to be investigating his wife. To now claim they only spoke about his grandchildren is an insult and total bullshit. This is something any lawyer would tell you – you CANNOT do.
The Attorney General has now been compromised. She should RESIGN. Sorry, but this is the real world. I could not even say hello to Oliver Brown and still have not spoken to him, seen how he is doing, or been able to say thank you. Bill Clinton knew what he was doing and Lynch knew as well. Enough is enough. They simply assumed they could get away with it on a tarmac. She was in the plane already. That means he went out of his way to jump on the plane. This is not giving a smile walking past someone you know as a lawyer you cannot speak to legally. We already know Lynch will NEVER indict Hillary. It would be political suicide for her career and Obama has no doubt already told her – lay off. It does not take this long to investigate and Hillary should not be running if she was REALLY under any possibility of being charged. That means the whole Democratic machine has assurances from the White House Hillary will never be prosecuted. Bill just had to make sure since this is the woman who can stop him from becoming the first male First Lady.
Does Brexit Represent an Ideological Forecast For U.S. 2016 Presidential Outcome?..
The globalists that are ALL OUT TO LINE THEIR OWN POCKETS have created a situation that could bring down Western Civilization completely and in a worst case scenario take us into a second Dark Age! We are on the brink of something very very bad!
Donald Trump Interview With Sean Hannity – Video 6/30/16…
Long but informative — watch and listen!
Can Rating Agencies be Trusted?
Armstrong Economics Blog
Re-Posted Jul 1, 2016 by Martin Armstrong
COMMENT: The manipulations of S&P indicate that these clowns’ output should be printed on absorbent paper. The point is exactly that this company and its directors have changed their rating based on anticipated events, and, given on the exact day as the Tory party’s leaders are being chosen, precisely in order to increase pressure on Britain’s political system whilst it is in the process of sorting itself out. This company has shown itself to be entirely devoid of any professional ethics. The sooner non-US ratings agencies are formed to clean up that industry, the better.
Above the toilet roll holders it should now read: “S&P analysis, please take one”
REPLY: I fully agree. The problem is that the S&P is a FOR-PROFIT private group and I believe they are not trustworthy. They have shown that they compete with other rating agencies and will sell ratings to the highest bidder. It is not that they are US based, it is that they are FOR-PROFIT.
I recently attended a meeting with one of our pension fund clients. They swapped all government debt for private, top-notch corporate debt. They made back $2 billion. The rating agency said they were taking on more risk because they swapped to private from public. Our client did their own due diligence based on our recommendation and confirmed that there was never a default by a major corporation in this category, but government debt has defaulted, rates have been artificially reduced, and holders of debt are often forced to take a haircut. They had no response. They clearly rate according to opinion rather than hard facts. They have become far too political and should have been thrown in prison for what they did with rating CDOs at AAA. I believe they are just not trustworthy
Centinel2012 