Did the Fed Create Cash or Debt with QE?


Fed Excess Reserves

QUESTION: Mr. Armstrong; some people say you are wrong because the Fed did not create “cash,” but rather made more debt available through the QE process and whether people hoard money is irrelevant. I do not agree with this statement for the Fed clearly bought bonds, they did not create debt. It seems some people have completely got this all confused. Can you clarify this.

Thanks

ANSWER: This is a very strange question. I really do not know how in the world someone can say the Fed did not create cash but debt. The entire theory of QE was to increase the money supply in circulation by purchasing government bonds. That would then inject cash into the system since the Fed does not and cannot create debt for it has no such borrowing authority. If they are saying that the debt still increased because Congress always spends more each year, that is irrelevant and cannot be attributed to the Fed creating debt. Then to say hoarding does not take place or is irrelevant is just unbelievable. I do not understand the reasoning.

ElasticThe Feb bought in government bonds. The banks sold their bond holdings to the Fed and then complained they would have no place to park their cash. They lobbied the Fed to pay 0.25% interest on excess cash parked at the Fed beyond their required reserves. The Fed accommodated the banks defeating the entire theory of QE which is in part why it did not create inflation; the banks never lent the money out parking (hoarding) it at the Fed instead.  Here is a chart of the Fed’s facility they created to satisfy the banks.  It stands at about $2.4 trillion. The banks HOARDED the cash injected by the Fed and did not lend it out. The Fed has the power to create money known as the elastic money supply, but it does not create debt. There were no excess reserves before QE. Instead of stimulating the economy, the banks themselves have hoarded the cash and not lent it into the economy.

Then corporations also HOARDED cash to such a point they have engaged in a massive buy-backs of their shares. This too is counter-trend to the entire idea of “stimulus.” Corporations reducing shares and handing back cash is deflationary reducing assets.

Now let’s mix into this madness Europe. Why is Draghai unable to create inflation in Europe with his outrageous QE program and negative interest rates? The answer is very simple. There is no real confidence in Europe to borrow money to start any business. So what are the banks doing there? They are shipping money over to their US branch which must be part of the Fed system and as such they then park the money at the Fed and collect 0.25%. When rates are negative, they have a great spread and no risk. This is not me making up stuff or speculating. I have spoken with banks in Europe directly.

So normally I would not bother to answer such a frivolous question. This should be as simple as black and white. This is exactly what Bill Gross is hoping for that the Fed will once again exchange bonds for cash and thus place a bid underneath the market that will support bonds. There are disagreements behind the curtain and it is not entirely certain the Fed would attempt something they themselves now realize failed. They just lucked out that the US economy is in far better shape than Europe. This is why Yellen met at the White House and has kept saying that interest rates have to be normalized. The central banks are trapped. When the economy turns down starting next year more aggressively, she knows that creating more “helicopter money” by this QE program will not work. The very first thing she MUST do is shut down the excessive reserve facility allowing worldwide banks parking money at the Fed. Only doing that will the banks be force to actually “stimulate” by lending money to real live people to create something. That seems to not be old-school.

Thanks to Goldman Sachs, you took an investment bank and allowed it to change the entire banking system from Relationship Banking transforming it into Transactional Banks. So now, normal banks think the way to do business is not to lend to real live people, but lend the money and then resell it to someone else. They have altered the face of banking forever. (I also sat on the board of a bank 30 years ago when large loans would be presented to the board and that was our decision to lend or not to that customer. Those days are gone).

Can You be Forced to Incriminate Yourself With Your Phone of Computer?


Apple Cell Fingerprint

The government is dancing between the raindrops. The 5th Amendment states that you cannot be compelled to testify against yourself. You have the right to remain silent. So how do they get around this? In my case, I personally was not held in contempt since that would have violated my constitutional right. Instead, the corporate officer was held in contempt, and since a corporation is not a person that right did not apply.

The bad news is that the government has held that anyone under investigation must submit a DNA sample, which they can then use to trace you or any member of your family who is suspected of a crime. Even worse is what courts have done with this regarding telephones. If you use a fingerprint scanner as a security feature on your computer or cell phone, they can trace it and throw you in prison until you do as the court demands because they regard any biological evidence as an exception. In other words, you are not being forced to testify against yourself. They are taking bodily evidence to find you guilty.

Now that measure may be acceptable in extreme cases such as rape. However, the government is simply using this to go after money. They need not even know that anything is on your phone. The mere fact that there might be evidence is sufficient to imprison you for life, without a trial, under civil contempt. Courts can and do order people to unlock their phones with their fingerprint. Providing a password is different from providing a fingerprint. So you might want to forget biotechnology for security. The legal implications are far different from a password.

Congressional Elections for 2016


Congress - 2016

While the media focuses on the U.S. presidential election, the real power is dangling in Congress. The 2018 election will be far more important as there is a risk of Independents sweeping into Congress at that time. For now, there is a total of 469 seats in the U.S. Congress (34 Senate seats and 435 House seats) that are up for election on November 8, 2016.

John McCain is already concerned that he may lose his seat because he has come out in favor of Trump. Actually, I say good riddance. McCain voted to impose taxes on internet commerce. When asked why he supported raising taxes, he replied that he was not voting to raise taxes, rather he was simply voting to collect taxes that should be collected. McCain is a hypocrite. There is no country he would not invade, including Canada.

The big story of the 2016 election cycle will be in Congress. The congressional election cycle will determine whether the Democratic Party will be able to regain control of the Senate. In order to take that chamber back, the Democrats will need to gain five seats in 2016. That may not sound like a lot, but it could be very difficult. Republican incumbents, not Democrats, hold the majority of the vulnerable seats. Consequently, Democrats only have 10 seats to defend in 2016, while 24 Republican incumbents are up for re-election. There is a shot that the Democrats could accomplish a victory.

US Senate 1855-2015

The Democrats have been in a bearish trend since the Great Depression and have been making lower lows. Nonetheless, independents are turning up. The success of Bernie and Trump shows that the public is in a foul mood. As we begin to get closer to the elections, this should begin to flesh out, especially in August. We have to be concerned that August is often a time of civil unrest/war. So, we may begin to see activity rise at that time prior to the elections.

Son leaves Mon's Basement

You do have a young (and over-the-hill) socialist movement against Trump. They actually claim this is some new form of socialism where you can give them more without robbing the rich. Very strange. They are throwing words around that Trump is a racist as they are doing in Britain against Nigel Farage. They are completely ignorant since “Muslim” is a religion and not a race. The benefit of being young is you can also be stupid.

STORM CLOUDS ARE FORMING . . .


I agree there isn’t much time time before all hell breaks loose.

Gov’t Is Incapable of Managing Anything – The Electric Crisis in Europe


Electric Cars

Part of the global warming/climate change deals, many people do not realize that in Europe there will be no more gasoline and diesel cars on the streets come 2020. From Norway to India the year 2020 will mark the end of petrol or diesel vehicles. This is part of the long-term bear market in energy. Germany wants to bring at least million electric vehicles on the roads. However, this energy policy presents a crisis. They never realized that to prevent cars from using oil based energy, they have to get ready for a 25%-30% increase in power consumption. Shutting down nuclear power plants means you are transferring one pollution source for another.  Meanwhile, Germany was to shut down all nuclear power by 2022. Nobody seems to have figured out the coordination of these two trends.

Tripwire Alert – Arrogant Speaker Paul Ryan Refuses To Support Donald Trump…


We know from the past six years that the GOPe/RNC wants the same things as do the progressives and the DNC so Trump can expect no cooperation in making any changes to existing programs. In my opinion he will need to start a media campaign no later than March or April 2017 to get the people to put pressure on the congress to make the changes they want so he can sign them.

Euro Collapsing thanks to Another Brain-Dead EU Proposal


Merkel-Forcing Refugees

Merkel’s failed refugee policy is destroying the fabric of Europe and raising international concerns that Europeans may need visa’s because she has introduce the prospect of ISIS using Europe as a stepping to get into the USA. Now, Merkel’s policy is to force other countries to take refugees. The European Commission now wants to compel European member states to accept  refugees by imposing a fine of 250,000 euros per applicant they deny. Instead of admitting a huge mistake, they are creating a mandatory option that will only bring in more people. Merkel’s policy is tearing Europe apart at the seams. Instead of dealing with the issue directly and publicly stating ALL refugees will be turned away, the crisis only get worse. About 80% are not even refugees from Syria. These are people migrating to Euro from northern Africa and other places using this as the great way to the promised land. The euro has been collapsing as a result of this new brain-dead idea where politicians REFUSE to every admit a mistake. They take their countries down in the process. Friends in London are starting to say if Britain does not exit the EU, they will migrate to the USA. This is becoming completely an insane Brussel’s policy and the member states who do not get out are out of their mind. The economic union has become a political union with dictatorial powers from Brussels as the Troika never even stand for election so there is no way to vote the people out of power.

Why the Quantity of Money Theory is DEAD Wrong


Money Theory

COMMENT: Bill Gross says you are wrong and helicopter money is coming and the Fed should print trillions to buy government bonds. Any comments?

REPLY:Gross is not making a forecast without self-interest. Gross’ “helicopter money” calls for the Federal Reserve and U.S. Treasury to engage in another round of quantitative easing (QE) by printing trillions of dollars to buy government bonds. This is his Hail Mary play intended to boost the economy. How will that stimulate the economy? He runs Janus’ bond fund. It will only bail him out of losses on bonds.

Printing money to create “stimulation” is a fallacy. It has never worked. The theory of the quantity of money increasing or decreasing is pure nonsense. This typical one-dimensional thought process is incapable of understanding complexity.

Fed Velocity of Money May 1 2016

LongBranchNJ-DepressionScrip

The missing element is the velocity of money. If people hoard money without spending, then increasing the quantity of money will fail to produce inflation. Creating inflation, such as what Japan saw one month before raising the sales tax, demands that people see the price of goods rising so they spend the money faster because they fear it will cost them more tomorrow. Why did Roosevelt confiscate gold and devalue the dollar? People were hoarding money. There was such a shortage of money, more than 200 cities began to issue their own money known today as Depression Scrip.

This idea of “helicopter money” is rather pathetic and fails to dive deep into how the economy functions. Irrespective of the quantity of money, the velocity of money is what always distinguishes deflation from inflation. You could increase the money supply and nothing would happen. Alternatively, you could leave the money supply unchanged and people would suddenly lose confidence in government, causing the velocity to increase thereby producing inflation. This is not an opinion. This is the simple evidence that emerges from correlating everything. Above is the Fed’s latest chart on the Velocity of Money. It peaked with the Economic Confidence Model high in 1998. Despite the increase in money supply, the velocity has been declining. First, we have see pervasive tax increases reducing the disposable income so people have less to spend as government consumes everything. Then, you have price deflation thanks to the internet. Countless stores have closed because they cannot compete with the internet. That reduces jobs and we have over 60% of the people graduating college cannot find jobs in the field they obtained a degree. Bernie’s idea that education should be free will be a disaster for it will will only subsidize a system which is failing to begin with. What the Clinton’s did to students should be reversed that they should be allowed to declare bankruptcy on student loans. We have to undo this mess created by subsidizing education that is pointless.

Trapped
Clearly, you are trapped in your one-dimensional world within this theory of the quantity of money. There is more to everything than this simplistic reduction of how the world functions to a single cause and effect. You have good days and bad days, but are they always due to the same exact cause? All this talk about “helicopter money” means nothing. Inflation only emerges when people DO NOT HOARD cash and spent it faster because they fear it will buy less tomorrow. There is ZERO evidence that has emerged with QE at any stage. It is pure sophistry.

Welcome to the world of complexity. It takes just a bit more thought and unbiased investigation to see how things really work.

We became the largest global advisory firm for one reason. A Swiss banker explained it to me. He said everyone used us because we did not care if the dollar went up or down. I am a trader. I can make money in either direction. I refused money management roles of equities funds when I would be barred from flipping everything into a short. Long-only positions were stupid and dangerous to me. So stop trying to prove me wrong and take a fresh look at the evidence. If you do, you might learn something that saves your family’s future. It’s your choice. There is just more to this game than one cause and effect. It’s called complexity.

13 year old Children going to Jail for Possessing a Counterfeit Note in School


$2 bills

Houston police call the police and accuse little girl trying to buy her lunch with a $2 bill. The government teacher assumed it was counterfeit because she never heard of a $2 bill. The police big an investigation going to her mother who then said she was given it in chance at a store. The police then go to the store to investigate who gave them a $2 bill. All this wasted time because the government employees involved never heard of a $2 bill.

It turns out, the police routinely are called in an prosecute children who may be passing a counterfeit as if they were the person counterfeiting the note. If the police can charge a children with a fake note as being a forger, they face 10 years in prison. A seventh grade student was arrested for merely possessing a counterfeit $10 bill.  He was put in handcuffs, thrown into a squad-car, the hole 9 yards. He was charged with a felony and then sent to an alternative school before he was given a fair hearing and found guilty of anything.

British Protest Note

 

British Protest Note EnlargementFrom 1697 until 1832, the act of forgery or even the use of forged notes was punishable by DEATH. This satirical note was designed by 17th century cartoonist George Cruikshank in protest to the rising number of pretend forgers who were sentenced to death and hanged. Standard features of the Bank of England notes are replaced by gruesome ornaments such as skulls, a hangman’s noose, with ships for transportation to British colonial prisons in Australia.This surrounds the image of Britannia feeding on infants.

The crime was mere possession. If you accepted a note and did not know it was counterfeit, it was a death sentence. In Texas, police are charging children with felonies for the same mere possession of a counterfeit note.

The practice of hanging so many people finally led the Bank of England to offer the convicted the option of a “plea bargain” in the form of a guilty plea by a prisoner. So to avoid death, people would plead to a crime they did not commit, the same practice as today with 98% of cases involving plea deals. In this case, you took the deal and received a sentence to 14 years “transportation,” meaning the prisoner would be exiled to British colony prisons in America or later Australia. These were the first “slaves” bought by American plantation owners. It was forbidden in the US constitution as indentured servitude. Therefore, history repeats because the abuse of government never changes. Today, even the possession of a wad of cash is presumed to be guilty and subject to confiscation.

Annoying, Irrelevant Gnats Will Now Seek Third Party Candidate…


There is no real difference between the RNC/GOPe and the DNC and untill the citizens are fully aware of this there can not be a real change. Trump and Sanders are the result of the citizens beginning to wake up and understand that virtually all in DC are out ONLY for themselves and they don’t care a lick for the common man/woman. Once the citizens are fully awake there will be hell to pay for all the political class in DC.