Posted originally on Jun 3, 2025 by Martin Armstrong
The United Kingdom admitted it “lost control” over its own national security and permitted the invasion of thousands of illegal migrants. Once the naval powerhouse of the world, the former British Empire has “lost” the ability to protect its own shores from the onslaught of migrants that have been pouring in since its leaders adopted open border policies. Men with little to no resources in canoes are suddenly overpowering the long-admired British fleet. In truth, the government has not “lost control,” as this is a calculated effort to reshape the UK.
Others are blaming France for not preventing migrants from launching from their shores. French police stopped 38% of migrants (8,347 people) attempting to reach the UK by boat this year. French authorities prevented 45% of new arrivals in 2024, and 47% in 2023. France is receiving €541 million over a three-year period from the UK government to prevent illegal crossings in the English Channel. France has hired hundreds of new law enforcement officers to patrol the waters, but the number of asylum seekers continues to rise.
Upon taking office, Sir Keir Starmer announced that the Rwanda plan was “dead” as he would not deport migrants to third nations. Labour has stated they are seeking a “calm and patient rebuilding” of migration policies and refuse to accept any large-scale deportation efforts. If you can make it to shore, you can likely stay. Starmer has said the UK is becoming an “island of strangers” but refuses to adopt any policies to curb the inflow.
The United Kingdom is experiencing a mass repopulation event. The former population is being replaced with both legal and illegal immigrants. Birth rates are plummeting, public debt is rising, and the government is openly permitting migrants to enter to maintain its public welfare state. Rather than fixing the issues that are causing the population to contract, the government is importing a new population. The British political elite, both Tory and Labour, have failed to grasp the historical implications of these shifts. It is not racist or xenophobic to observe patterns and hard truths. The core identity of the UK and other Build Back Better nations has been abandoned and replaced. They are not bringing in migrants for humanitarian purposes, and it would be a lie to think that the UK was completely unable to secure its border. If they can’t prevent a few thousand men on cheap boats from entering, how could they protect themselves in time of war? The government is allowing this to happen because it needs new taxpayers to replace the workers it failed to produce.
This is why conservative leaders are attempting to rebuild domestic manufacturing and providing incentives for women to have children. The global mainstream media is controlled by the left, and therefore, these nationalist values are painted as a form of hatred or superiority. Quite the contrary, as conservative leaders are attempting to save their nation’s culture and traditions by encouraging the success of their own population.
Globalism is directly tied to repopulation theory. “In the future, countries with aging populations may need migration to sustain their economies,” Bill Gates said, as he strongly believes that the world is overcrowded. “The world today has 6.8 billion people… that’s headed up to about 9 billion. If we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”
Repopulation theory is more of a tactic than a theory. Hence, leaders like Starmer are ignoring warnings and standing idle as a demographic shift permanently alters their nation. As it stands, first-generation migrants will compose 25% of the UK’s population by 2035, according to the Centre for Migration Control, and the UK’s overall population will surge to 73 million. It may seem far off, but that is only a decade from now. All Build Back Better nations will be utterly unrecognizable thanks to repopulation tactics.
originally on Posted Jun 2, 2025 by Martin Armstrong
Terrorists—actual terrorists and not “right-winged extremists” that were branded terrorists under the Biden/Auto-Pen Administration—strongly supported Kamala Harris ascending to the presidency. CNN mistakenly aired the truth when interviewing a freed Israeli hostage. My Hamas captors “wanted Kamala to be chosen—to be elected,” he admitted.
The victim, Omer Shem Tov, told CNN that his captors became fearful when Donald Trump won the election. “They were very scared of him,” the man revealed, saying that his captors stopped spitting on him, cursing at him, and starving him once Trump secured the election. His captors held Shem Tov for nearly a year and a half. The torment increased over time, especially when Western media portrayed Kamala as the certain victor. He went from receiving two pieces of pita bread daily to perhaps a biscuit and a few sips of water. “There were times I thought I was blind,” he said. “It was so dark, I couldn’t see my own hand in front of my face.”
“Then he came into the road, and they were very scared of him.” Terrorists are emboldened by Western weakness. They saw Biden’s hasty retreat from Afghanistan, which provided terrorists with billions in military equipment. They enjoyed direct proceeds from USAID that funneled US public funds to NGOs and ultimately to nearly every major terrorist group in the Middle East. The Hamas captors knew in this instance that the hostages were their last remaining leverage,e and a strong president would react if they were not returned.
Bash: “Joe Biden just made a really big decision—Afghanistan—were you the last person in the room?”
The Democrats were in favor of continuing USAID and contributions to NGOs that supported terrorism. The Democrats permit privileged white children to run around school campuses and destroy property in the name of “freeing Palestine.” Harris was opposed to Hamas and in favor of supporting Israel, but spoke gently about the subject matter.
“I am sending Israel everything it needs to finish the job, not a single Hamas member will be safe if you do not comply with my orders,” Trump said. “‘Shalom Hamas’ means Hello and Goodbye – You can choose. Release all hostages immediately and return the remains of those you have slain, or face dire consequences. Only depraved individuals retain bodies, and you are indeed depraved.” Trump reiterated that “not a single Hamas member will be safe” if they did not abide by his zero tolerance policy.
America’s adversaries did not live in fear under Biden. They saw how divided the nation became under one of the most disastrous administrations in US history. Iran publicly threatened America a day before Joe Biden was set to arrive in Israel, for example. They believed that they had the upper hand.
America’s enemies did not feel safe during Trump’s first term. When the Taliban was threatening the US, President Trump sent the leader of the Taliban a picture of his house. “Didn’t you at one point tell him, ‘I know exactly where you are,’ and give him the exact coordinates where he was?” Sean Hannity asked Trump. Trump replied, “No, I sent him a picture of his house. He said, ‘But why but why do you send me a picture of my house?’ I said, ‘You have to figure that one out.’ “I said, ‘If you do anything – from that point on we didn’t lose one soldier – we’re going to hit you harder than any country has ever been hit.’ He said, ‘I understand, your Excellency.’”
What happened when ISIS leader Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi was captured? Trump went on national TV to announce that the US would make good on its threats. He explained to the world how the leader of ISIS “died like a dog,” who spent his last moments in fear, running from American forces like a “coward” and hiding behind women and children.
In another instance, Trump posted a simple picture of the American flag to social media moments before an airstrike in Iraq that killed one of Iran’s top generals. Trump promised to obliterate all of America’s enemies, and America was feared. Foreign terrorists are cowering once again as they know the current administration will not hesitate to act. Middle Eastern leaders are eager to side with Trump to create lucrative trade deals, while also complying with US orders to curb violent factions of jihadists. Simply put–America is safer under Trump.
A migrant group has filed a lawsuit against the Trump Administration to extend Biden-era immigration parole programs. Biden provided undocumented migrants and their immediate families with a two-year parole to live in the US. Donald Trump signed an executive order on the first day of his presidency to end “all categorical parole programs,” but now, an activist judge is blocking his administration’s efforts.
U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani of Massachusetts, appointed by Obama, began blocking the Trump Administration from deporting migrants on a case-by-case basis. Her latest ruling is an attempt to ensure that hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants from across the globe remain in the US.
“This court emphasizes, as it did in its prior order, that it is not in the public interest to manufacture a circumstance in which hundreds of thousands of individuals will, over the course of several months, become unlawfully present in the country, such that these individuals cannot legally work in their communities or provide for themselves and their families,” the judge wrote.
Human Rights First (HRF) supported the class action lawsuit, as the group’s primary purpose is to shape global government policy. HRF is a massive organization with 300 partners spanning across 50 counties. These are the same people who inspired the 2016 Global Magnitsky Act that expanded the original 2012 Magnitsky Act to include more than Russian officials. The Global Maginsky Act permitted the government to sanction individuals, freeze assets, implement travel bans, and outright prevent companies or individuals from conducting business in the US. The European Union, the United Kingdom, and Canada adopted similar measures under the premise of “human rights.” Former President Obama signed both the 2012 Maginsky Act and the 2016 Global Maginsky Act.
Now, this Obama-appointed judge believes she has the right to step outside her jurisdiction and overturn federal orders. If the president had the power to implement these programs, then the president should have the power to dismantle them. Yet another example of a biased judge engaged in legal lawfare. It is also of interest that Judge Talwani donated to Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. And former President Obama.
The Supreme Court stepped in and overruled Talwani in 7-2 vote that declares the president has the authority to expel 500,00 migrants residing in the US. Associate Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor dissented. The case now must be considered by the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals. These activist judges are obstructing the rule of law with their extreme biases. As Schumer admitted, these judges were installed purely to spite Trump and overturn all of his orders. It’s time for the SCOTUS to look into these biased judges and determine if they are fit to judge matters based purely on the rule of law and not their own invisible hands.
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America
Centinel2012 