The EU Commission is calling on Germany to pay up to €12 billion more annually into the EU’s pocket for the European budget. With Brexit, there will be a gap in their funding of some €3.5 to €4 billion euros. The EU, in reality, would have less to monitor, but there are never any savings in government. It is always more and more. 

Of course, nobody comes close to the United States on military spending. Nonetheless, India has now surpassed France bumping it from the list of the big five military spenders. Many believe this is the policy because of the rise of China. But it is also because of Pakistan. War has changed, but countries are still arming themselves for a type of war that nobody is interested in anymore – empire building. Empire Building was created by, believe it or not, the DEFINITION OF MONEY!!!!!!!!!

For you see, why did Adam Smith (1723-1790) nation his world – the An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of Wealth of Nations? Smith visited Paris where the prevailing definition of money or the wealth of a nation was its Agriculture. These were the Physiocrats inspired by Francois Quesnay (1694-1774). It is true, before the Industrial Revolution, at least 70% of the GDP of a nation was agriculture. Even when the Great Depression hit in 1930, unemployment was very high because 40% of the population was still employed in Agriculture. If Agriculture was the bulk of a nation’s wealth, then it made common sense that the more LAND you possessed the richer the nation would be. That inspired Empire Building.

Then comes along in 1776 Adam Smith who disagrees and sees that a person who makes a carriage and exports it to another country returns with money the same as a farmer. Smith adopts what many hold is as the Merchantile Wealth Model. This gives way to the idea that the Wealth of a Nation is not its agriculture, but gold since gold is used as money among nations. As the Industrial Revolution begins and people begin to move from farms to work in the manufacture, Karl Marx (1818-1883) enters the arena.  Now Marx sees that labor is employed by someone with money and he then makes a profit by selling what his workers produce. Marx then sees the wealth as labor and advocates taking the wealth away from the capitalists and hand it to the people.

With the end of World War II, what has been proven is that gold is no longer MONEY that constitutes the Wealth of a Nation, it is, in fact, the total productive capacity of the people. Proof of this statement is the rise of Germany, Japan, and China have all accomplished the rise in economic stature not because of its possession of gold or even natural resources, but the TOTAL capacity of its people to produce what it has as a comparative advantage in the world of commerce. Now the UAE and Saudi Arabia have woken up. They realize that what has made their nations wealthy was selling oil to everyone else who used it to enhance their production of whatever that was their comparative advantage. It was David Ricardo (1772-1823) who advanced that understanding.

Therefore, the only rational explanation becomes clear. War has become obsolete. The days of Empire Building are no longer viable because we realize today that land does not equal wealth. We can even grow food indoors in warehouses of cities. Agriculture has itself gone through a cycle of evolution. So the USA has no interest in invading China or Russia and occupying their land. Nobody wants the management problem. It appears that war has devolved from economic gain to just two drunks in a bar who want to fight for no particular reason that one looked at the other the wrong way and did not even say a word.

If the wealth of a nation is the total capacity of its people, then why send your boys off to war when there is no longer any economic gain? By reducing your population, you actually reduce the wealth of a nation. Interesting how things have evolved over the centuries.

COMMENT: I saw you in front of the Bank of England. Then within a matter of days, the pound crashes. You may not be a household name but you are in the circles that matter. So did you orchestrate the reverse trend in the pound?

OD

REPLY: No! The pound crashed simply because it was on schedule. My mere presence in London did not signal the end of the pound rally. I was there for some very important meetings with clients regarding other matters, not to help the Bank of England sell the pound. I do get rather tired of being blamed for everything. What you fail to grasp here is that there are very few of us with international experience. Local economists do not cut it and it seems that nobody else with hedge fund experience who has actually traded billions of dollars when a billion used to be a lot of money is around for consultation. They were trying to make another documentary about such things and nobody else was willing to appear because they feared to speak publicly about the fate of the Euro.

I get called because I tell the truth. I do not twist my view to what they want to hear just to get paid like some actor putting on a show. It is what it is. I have intimate knowledge of many aspects because when they were creating the Euro the commission in change all attended our WEC in London that year. I have been called into just about every crisis since the mid-1970s.

You cannot get in the door if you have ANY conflict of interest. I no longer manage money so there is no concern about insider trading that I will profit from the info from a closed-door meeting. It is as simple as that. I also sign confidentiality agreements to ensure that sensitive names and positions are not disclosed.

I did NOT meet with the Bank of England to orchestrate the shift in trend in the pound. The markets are bigger than me, and bigger than the Bank of England and ALL the central banks combined. Remember the Louvre Accord? That is when the central banks came out and tried to stop the decline in the dollar going into 1987. NEWS FLASH!!!! They failed! So, what happened? They called me again since I was the one warning them in 1985 they would unleash volatility.

Everyone knows my work. You cannot manipulate an individual market because we are all connected. Capital flows around the global financial system like a bottle on the ocean current.

I am called by governments and institutions, not for my OPINION, but because the computer is the only thing in the world that monitors the entire political-economic landscape and has a proven track record for almost 40 years.

You cannot manipulate any market beyond the normal channel of daily noise. You cannot make gold rise or fall if it is out of sync with the rest of the world. Those who keep poisoning the minds of people on that do so because their theories are wrong and have been since 1971