Tag Archives: Anti God

Sep 28 2020

The Markets & the Political Chaos into the Future – Where do we go?


Armstrong Economics Blog/Economics

Re-Posted Sep 28, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

Sometimes it is important to try to look at markets from an interrelated perspective. Here is the Dow/Gold Ratio which shows the extreme high in the Dow when gold made its historic low in 1999. We then see that gold rallied into 2011 against the Dow, but since that high, the Dow has been gaining ground over gold until the ratio peaked in 2018. While the Dow rallied to make a new record high into the Jan/Feb 2020 time period, it was again underperforming gold and it was declining from its 2018 high which curiously aligned with the Russel 2000 high in 2018.

With all the political chaos around the world and this clear coordinated trend using this virus to further the real goal of Climate Change, the deliberate scheme to crush the economy to prepare for Klaus Schwab’s Great Reset being pushed by the World Economic Forum, there is clearly some unsettling trends unfolding around the world.

Gold has NOT broken out yet in all currencies. In Japanese yen, it has still not made a new record high above 2013 as has been the case in Dollars and even Euro. This implies that the trend for gold is still in an upward bias which may last into the first quarter of 2021.

The DAX in Germany looks more like the Dow whereby it too has not made a new high beyond the 1st quarter. However, when we plot the Dax in terms of US dollars, we get a drastically different pattern all impacted by the currency. Indeed, despite all the evidence and high ranking officials in Germany Merkel is intending to lockdown Germany AGAIN! (see Merkel 2nd lockdown) German ministers warn that lockdowns kill more people than they save, yet Merkel ignores them, as well as Pfizer.

The computer has projected the rise in Civil Unrest and this will only increase post-US election moving into 2022 and then into 2024. As much as it is getting tiring with all this political back and forth, by far, we are not even limited to the United States. We have major elections in 2021 and 2022 around the world. With politics becoming so polarized, we MUST keep an eye on the big picture. As I have said, previous presidential elections in the USA were no big deal. If your candidate lost, you simply moved on and it really had little impact because the DEEP STATE was really in control and the agenda rarely changed other than perhaps taxes. This time it is very different. Capital is being driven around the world not out of investment opportunity, but out of political fear.

The likelihood of life returning to normal is very slim. This agenda is all about Climate Change and my RELIABLE inside sources in London are talking about lockdowns that may be necessary to save the planet. This seems to be more of a trial run to crush the world economy as we have known it. I always enjoyed going to New York City during the Christmas season to see the tree and the cheer. That will not happen in 2020 and it may not happen in 2021 either. There is clearly a UN agenda lurking behind this trend.

We have China & Russia seeking to break away from the Western monetary system and are preparing to reject the SWIFT system altogether. The more hostile the West becomes toward both, the greater the probability that as we head into 2032, the world economy will not just split, it will fragment as well.

With Trudeau suspending Parliament in Canada which was investigating corruption involving him and his family, there is certainly something very strange to see all of these politicians so willing to lockdown their people and undermine their economies creating debts that can never be repaid.

This makes it IMPERATIVE to rely on our computer system which is monitoring the entire world for we will need to track the capital flows to understand the future direction of all markets, we will need to comprehend both the political shifts as well as the debt markets combined with currencies. We have our work cut out for us. If we do not monitor the entire world, there is no way to avoid the crazy trends driven by foreign events.

Sep 28 2020

Appointees to the Supreme Court Are Not Required to Appear Before the Judiciary Committee under the Constitution


Armstrong Economics Blog/Politics

Posted Sep 28, 2020 by Martin Armstrong
We now have this nonsense put forth by Schumer that McConnel is destroying the institution of the Senate by appointing a justice to the Supreme Court before the election. He is calling McConnel’s, equally absurd argument he made when Justice Antonin Scalia died in February of 2016 nine months before the election.

McConnel argued that President Barack Obama should not appoint a new justice because he couldn’t run again. The seat should not be filled in an election year, McConnel claimed and refused to hold hearings to consider Obama’s eventual nominee, Judge Merrick Garland. McConnell said that not since 1888 had the Senate confirmed a Supreme Court nominee by an opposing party’s President to fill a vacancy that arose in an election year.

To make this very clear, there is ABSOLUTELY no requirement by the Constitution to withhold a vacancy to the Supreme Court because of politics. This is not law, and it was not even a rule. It was politics.

Indeed, candidates for the Supreme Court never appeared before the Senate until 1925. They were reviewed solely on their qualifications with no questioning. So all this argument over destroying the institution of the Senate is also total nonsense. On January 5, 1925, President Calvin Coolidge had nominated Attorney General Harlan Fiske Stone to a vacancy on the U.S. Supreme Court. Almost everyone agreed that Stone’s character, learning, and temperament eas excellent for the job. However, a complication arose that threatened Stone’s chances for an easy Senate confirmation. The source of the controversy was Senator Burton K. Wheeler, a progressive Democrat.

The previous year, Wheeler had launched an investigation to determine why Stone’s predecessor, Attorney General Harry Daugherty, had failed to prosecute government officials implicated in the Teapot Dome oil-leasing scandal. As a result of Wheeler’s probe, Daugherty resigned in March 1924.

After about a month in his new position as attorney general, Stone saw a federal grand jury in Montana indict Senator Wheeler on charges related to the conduct of his private law practice. Seeing the indictment as an effort to discredit his continuing investigation of the Justice Department, Wheeler asked the Senate to examine the charges against him. Following a two-month inquiry and without waiting for the Montana court to dispose of the case, the Senate outright exonerated Wheeler which of course was against the law to interfere in a legal matter of that nature.

The Wheeler case tormented Attorney General Stone for months. Influential friends of Wheeler urged Stone to drop both the Montana case and new information that led Wheeler’s opponents to seek a second indictment. Stone explained that he felt honor-bound to pursue the second indictment. Legally, this was absolutely correct. Stone made it clear that the Senate “is just not the place to determine the guilt or innocence of a man charged with crime.”

On January 24, 1925, five days after the Senate Judiciary Committee had recommended Stone’s confirmation, Senator Thomas Walsh—Wheeler’s Montana colleague and legal counsel, managed to convince the Senate to return the nomination to the committee for further review.

President Coolidge refused to withdraw the nomination. However, this was the background to these Senate appointments to the Supreme Court. It was Coolidge who agreed to an unprecedented compromise. He agreed to allow Stone to become the first Supreme Court nominee in history to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee. On January 28, 1925, Stone’s performance during five hours of public session testimony cleared the way for his confirmation.

Senator Wheeler soon won the acquittal of all charges. Not until 1955, however, did the Senate Judiciary Committee routinely adopt the practice, based on the precedent established by the Stone nomination, of requiring all Supreme Court nominees to appear in person.

Schumer has called this the McConnel Rule because he said the next Supreme Court justice should be chosen by the next president when Scalia died. That was really no such rule and it was not the position of the Constitution – just politics. This illustrates my position that I believe Ben Franklin’s recommendation that appointments to the Supreme Court should be made by the American Bar Association – not politicians.  Ben Franklin wanted to create a legal system based upon the Scottish model where judges were nominated by lawyers and not politicians. He lost that argument and we have been paying dearly ever since.

Kings_Bench_(1808)

Most people assume that the Framers of the Constitution simply relied on the English judicial system. On the contrary, the Scottish judicial system provided an important component, although it remains overlooked even today. The Scottish system was part of the model for the Framing of Article III in crafting the Judiciary. Unlike the English system of overlapping and primarily original jurisdiction with Chancery (Equity) and the King’s Bench (law), the Scottish judiciary featured a hierarchical, appellate-style judiciary, with one supreme civil court sitting at the top and an array of inferior courts of original jurisdiction below.

We, unfortunately, blended Equity and Law into the same court which was a MAJOR mistake, yet the Scottish judiciary operated within a constitutional framework which we adopted. The corruption in the English judiciary was widespread. Charles Dickens wrote in his introduction to Bleak House;

“This is the Court of Chancery ..• Suffer any wrong that can be done you, rather than come here!“

Under the Constitution, Trump should be appointing the next Justice and NOW! What McConnel did before was UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Personally, I believe we should adopt Ben Franklin’s model taken from Scotland. This claim that we should be voting for presidents to twist the law one way or another is in itself WRONG!

There are far too many aspects of the law that are NOT in the Constitution and the number one issue tearing the country apart is IMMUNITY they created for prosecutors and police which takes away any responsibility to act within the law. The abortion issue was founded on the Right to Privacy which is implicitly within the Constitution. However, then there is the definition of life to justify an abortion v murder. It becomes a fine line just as the legal age for sex. There has been a prosecution of an 18-year boy now labeled as a child molester because his girlfriend was under 18 and the father did not like the boy in Texas (see report). Unfortunately, these things tend to be arbitrary and decided by culture. The legal age varies greatly around the world from 12 to 18 with the United States being the highest.

Sep 28 2020

Project Veritas Exposes Ilhan Omar Allies in Alleged Ballot Harvesting Operation in Minnesota


Ilhan Omar connected Ballot Harvester in cash-for-ballots scheme: “Car is full” of absentee ballots

Project Veritas image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—September 28, 2020

 

Sep 27 2020

Stop your vote being stolen: Vote in person not by mail


Voting in person will prevent your vote being possibly stolen by a mail ballot falsely cast in your name and ensure the integrity and reliability of the election results

David Singer image

Re-Posted by The Conservative Tree House By  —— Bio and Archives—September 26, 2020

Stop your vote being stolen: Vote in person not by mail

As America continues to sink into an abyss of chaos, arson and looting—the last thing it needs are further protests across America or legal actions by teams representing either Republicans or Democrats challenging the election results on November 3, 2020.

The best way to stop these disasters happening is by voting in person—not by mail.

It is therefore disturbing to see the Washington Post giving the following advice to its readers in a panel headed ”Election 2020: What to know”

”Find out the rules in your state. Some states have already started sending out mail ballots; see how to make sure yours counts. Absentee and mail ballots are two terms for the same thing, mostly used interchangeably. Barring a landslide, we may not have a result in the presidential election on Nov. 3.”

This panel is prominently positioned below a Washington Post article dated August 17th headlined: “State officials rush to shore up confidence in Nov. 3 election as voters express new fears about mail voting”.

The article itself contains the following statements:

  • “Absentee voting has become so common that in 34 states and the District, any voter can ask for an absentee ballot, even if the voter is physically able to vote in person on Election Day, a practice called “no-excuse absentee voting.”
  • As the use of absentee voting evolved, election officials began referring to the practice with other terms, such as “advanced ballots,” “mailed ballots,” “vote-by-mail ballots” and “mail ballots,” according to the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL).
  • Some states prefer to call it “mail-in voting” rather than “absentee voting,” because voters will be mailed a ballot regardless of whether they are in town or “absent” from their polling precinct on Election Day.
  • Why are there so many terms? It’s a result of a decentralized election administration system in the United States, in which each state sets its own rules on how to conduct elections, experts say. And each state’s rules and regulations around absentee voting vary.
The advice is grossly misleading and is popping up all over the internet:

 “Absentee voting”: Requiring the voter to expressly request ballot papers be posted to him—is very different from “mail–in voting” : The unsolicited mail out of ballot papers addressed to individual voters where they may no longer live or maybe deceased—easily capable of being harvested and illegally completed.

Voter fraud can also occur in the case of absentee voting.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton’s Testimony before the United States House of Representatives Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties on June 3,  2020 gave these examples:

“In 2019, an Oakland County clerk outside Detroit, Michigan was charged with illegally altering 193 absentee ballots. A Minneapolis, Minnesota man was charged with helping 13 others falsify absentee ballots ahead of the 2018 election. In 2017, a Dallas County, Texas man was convicted after 700 mail-in ballots were witnessed and signed by a fictitious person. And recently in North Carolina’s 9th Congressional District race, a scheme was run to steal 1,200 absentee ballots and fill them out, in a race that was decided by only 900 votes.”

Only 61.4 percent of the voting-age population voted in 2016—similar to 2012.

A 2019 Gallup poll found only 4 in 10 Americans expressed confidence in the honesty of elections in the country—while 6 did not.

Voting in person will prevent your vote being possibly stolen by a mail ballot falsely cast in your name and ensure the integrity and reliability of the election results.

Sep 27 2020

The Masks – A Symbol of the Real Agenda


Armstrong Economics Blog/Climate

Re-Posted Sep 27, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

I have spent decades in Asia, and people who were sick wore masks as a matter of courtesy. Masks were not worn by people to prevent getting sick because they do not work that way. When I went to the ER and they threw me into a COVID wing, I told them I did not know anyone with COVID. They said I could have gotten it by touching the nozzle to fill my car with gas. That statement right then and there proves masks do nothing.

Most people will be touching their faces or adjusting their mask, and if they touched something with COVID, then the mask will become infected. This is one giant scam to push Klaus Schwab’s Great Reset from the World Economic Forum.

The use of masks and social distancing has destroyed the world economy and created over 300 million unemployed people. They have actually hurt the minorities and lower classes whose labor was dependent upon their presence. Not everyone can work from home. The whole agenda is about stopping people from commuting to eliminate fossil fuels. Only 8% of those in New York have returned to offices. The lockdowns increased the supply of oil by another three years. There were over 400 wells in production in Texas, which have declined to just over 100. They have erected this clock in New York City to tell us we have now just 7 years left.

What I find extremely disturbing is that Al Gore claimed back in 2009 certain models projected total ice-free during the summer months at the North Pole, which he put in this forecast from 2014 to 2016.

I have provided the real explanation of How & Why Ice Ages Are Created and the fact that the North Sea Passage has been passable to ships on a cyclical basis over the centuries.

There is no coming back from this deliberate economic destruction. They are deliberately trying to CRUSH the world economy to further their goal to control climate change. Unfortunately, everything that our computer has forecast has been absolutely correct from Trump and BREXIT winning back in 2016, the rise of civil unrest, the corruption for the 2020 election, the rise in food prices due to shortages, and the ultimate end-game will be the destruction of Western society post-2032 and the shift of the financial capital of the world to China.

Sep 27 2020

The Ultimate Hypocrisy – Democrats Against Women with Families & Catholic?


Armstrong Economics Blog/Rule of Law

Re-Posted Sep 27, 2020 by Martin Armstrong
On the one hand, the Democrats are trying to get the Catholic vote arguing that Biden is only the second Catholic to be President after JFK. But then, they oppose Amy Coney Barrett because she is a Catholic and was a professor at Notre Dame Law School before her confirmation to the federal bench. Here is Feinstein who accuses Barrett that her religion will supersede the law. You really can’t have it both ways.

I was raised Catholic, but that never stood in the way of understanding law. I remember when I was just 10 years old my father taking me to Willingboro, New Jersey to see John F. Kennedy in person. I actually met President John F. Kennedy and shook his hand as a kid that day on Oct. 16, 1960, but unlike Bill Clinton, it did not inspire me to become President. I remember as a kid walking around and hearing people bash Kennedy because he was Catholic saying the Pope will run America. There is no doubt that the vast majority of immigrants to America were Protestant and as such the old hatreds rose their head and they will no doubt regarding Amy Coney Barrett.

Former President Harry Truman actually said that Kennedy should withdraw his name for nomination the night before the Democratic Convention. During the 1950s prejudices against Catholics were dominant and were preached by some Protestant ministers.  On October 20, 1951, President Harry Truman nominated former General Mark Clark to be the United States emissary to the Vatican. Clark was forced to withdraw his nomination on January 13, 1952, following protests from Texas Senator Tom Connally and Protestant groups. Mark Clark was baptized Episcopalian and his mother was Jewish. Connally did not want any representative at the Vatican.

Indeed, during the 1960 election Prominent Protestant spokesmen, led by Billy Graham and Norman Vincent Peale, organized Protestant ministers by warning that the Pope would be giving orders to a Kennedy White House. Many established evangelical groups were mobilized.

It is interesting for the extreme left demand the Democrats stop the nomination of the Supreme Court and even call it illegitimate clinging to this conspiracy that Trump was put in office by Putin. The Democrats have little power to actually derail Trump’s pick. Nevertheless, they are applying considerable pressure for the Democrats to be obstructive and use every tactic at their disposal to not just obstruct but to portray the consideration as a farce that shouldn’t even occur. Of course, there is no such precedent for this nonsense, especially when justices do not always vote even party lines – i.e. Chief Justice Roberts.

Now the left is arguing that she should be investigated to see how she adopted two children from Haiti. As I have stated, I have read her work and she is a STRICT CONSTRUCTIONIST which is the best we can hope for. It was Justice Scalia who reform the sentencing procedures were judges were violating the constitution deciding facts that only a jury was authorized to determine. So, this will be interesting. How to bash Barrett for being Catholic while having two black children which shows she is not a racist so they are turning that into something like hiring illegal aliens. They cannot be promoting Biden as only the second Catholic to become president why bashing her because she if Catholic and somehow the Pope will dictate her decisions which never took place with JFK. This is the ultimate paradox.

Sep 26 2020

Biden’s Pre-Debate Prep


Everyone knows Joe Biden is not fit to be president. We’ve all seen him mumble in confusion during public appearances. He’s a gaffe machine. He’s a corrupt, career politician with dementia. Yet the Democrats and their lying mass media continue to pretend he’s perfectly fine—good ol’ Joe.

He sounded relatively sharp for his convention speech, but since then his behavior and speaking ability have been very questionable. I saw him make short speech during a recent and rare campaign appearance and he was barely audible. He fielded no questions. He can barely read a teleprompter correctly. On another occasion he blew up in anger when questioned about his son, Hunter. Uncontrollable anger is also a symptom of dementia.

For next week’s debate with Trump, I expect Sleepy Joe will be charged up with the same drug given to him ahead of his DNC speech. Probably meth, which apparently brightens the otherwise dimming lights of those suffering dementia.

Given Biden’s condition, the Democrats need to drug him up. Their only other alternative is for him to contract some sudden illness—perhaps COVID 19. Or maybe the Democrats no longer care. Why cover up for Joe? Everyone is aware that Biden is not all there, but he doesn’t need to be for a Harris administration.

—Ben Garrison

Sep 26 2020

Grand Theft Election


Everything the Democrats are planning will come to this, a coup attempt. If unsuccessful, a replay of the election of 1860, complete with secession threats, possibly carried out

Ray DiLorenzo image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—September 26, 2020

Cover StoryNews Headlines and Videos | 2 Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

Grand Theft Election

A theft is in the process of being carried out. It is a crime so insidious, so Machiavellian, it could spell the end of the greatest nation ever conceived, and the rest of the free world will soon follow. It is a coup, a theft of an election, not to rid our country of traitors, but to purge the nation of patriots. Democrats have driven this nation, once again, to a point of division and armed conflict not seen since the Civil War. No person of any intelligence can call this politics as usual.

Democrats decided back in 2016 that they will NOT accept a Trump presidency, elections be damned

Democrats decided back in 2016 that they will NOT accept a Trump presidency, elections be damned. The last four years proves it. Their goal now is to carry out a plan to totally control Congress, the Presidency and the Supreme Court. They will use every weapon at their disposal. It will include a manufactured pandemic, changing voter ID requirements at the 11th hour, court packing, states added to the Union, using former military officers once prominent in the Deep State, employing their useful idiots in Antifa and BLM, Big-Tech censorship of conservative thought, creating fear among the Black community…“They’ll put you back in chains”, the district attorneys carefully placed around the country by George Soros, and the hundreds of lawyers already recruited. They have even conducted ‘war games’ of sort. Some 50 Leftist groups, headed by John Podesta, got together after the 2016 election to devise a post 2020 election scenario to hatch an action plan if the election was close. If allowed to succeed it will be the end of a two-party, free republic, and the birth of a godless, socialist dictatorship. And so, their scheme continues.

The Democrats decided months ago, that they are going to lose this coming election. They nominated a do-nothing pervert, well past his prime, politician of 47 years, with obvious signs of dementia. A corrupt politician who as much as admitted it to anyone who cared to hear it.

The Democrats will attempt to steal this election. Proof? All the top Democrats, including Biden, are saying the Republicans will lie, steal, cheat, and even collude with foreign powers to win the coming election. Democrats always do what they accuse Republicans of doing. It’s a strategy to divert attention from their plotting. Following their accusations makes it easy to stay ahead of them. If you remember, back in early 2016, Clinton’s people said Trump would not accept the results of the election and then they spent the next four years screaming that Trump was not a legitimate president. It’s causing political chaos and now violence. The rioting and bloodshed is being used to screen their movements. And part of their operation is protecting their donors, the rich and famous. Democrats know the middle class is in trouble, that there is tremendous income inequality and they plan to keep it that way.

After a Trump landslide on election night, Biden will not concede. The DNC will not allow it

Protests are building again. BLM is rioting in Louisville, not caring about the facts of the Breonna case. Indoor and outdoor diners are being harassed in major cities, having their food and drinks thrown off the tables surrounded by screams. They are moving into residential neighborhoods, protesting, harassing senators and members of congress in the middle of the night, stealing Trump campaign signs, physically assaulting anyone wearing Trump garb. The Brown Shirts of Nazi Germany and the Black Shirts of Fascist Italy would be proud of them.

After a Trump landslide on election night, Biden will not concede. The DNC will not allow it. The mail-in voting the Democrats wanted so badly will then come into play. They will produce hundreds of thousands of harvested ballots, lawful or unlawful, day after day after the election, to tip the scales in their favor in states they are close to winning. Military ballots have already been found in the trash in Pennsylvania.

Millions will be mobilized to contest an outcome not to their liking while the courts deliberate. If there is no decision by January 20, the Speaker will have to become acting president. The Supreme Court will eventually come into play or possibly the House of Representatives if the Electoral College cannot come to a decision. Whether the House will flip on election day is anyone’s guess. After the plethora of ‘righteous indignation’, further violence will be a certainty.

Democrats have had an obsession of late. They dream of the military dragging Trump out of the White House

What will happen next is right out of any third-world nation coup d’état attempt. They will call in the military, a military Obama carefully purged during his presidency. Any officer that was promoted during his administration has bought into the progressive agenda. This is the great unknown. What will the military do?

Democrats have had an obsession of late. They dream of the military dragging Trump out of the White House. Biden’s recent campaign statement: “The United States government is perfectly capable of escorting trespassers out of the White House” shows his state of mind.

Everything the Democrats are planning will come to this, a coup attempt. If unsuccessful, a replay of the election of 1860, complete with secession threats, possibly carried out. The first ones coming from California, Oregon and Washington. Then the old question will rear its ugly head, the legality of secession and its aftermath.

Its aftermath, that is another question.

Sep 26 2020

Democrats Ideologically In Bed With BLM?


The announcement, was made, in effect, yesterday by Democrat vice presidential candidate Kamala Harris

Judi McLeod image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—September 26, 2020

 

Democrats Ideologically In Bed With BLM?

There can no longer be any doubt about it: The Democrats are ideologically in bed with Black Lives Matter (BLM).

The future belongs to BLM and not to average American citizens, as haughtily decreed yesterday by Sen. Kamala Harris.

“Peaceful protests against racial injustice are critical for the nation’s progress and help to keep law enforcement in check, Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., said Friday. (Fox News, Sept. 25, 2020.)

“Nothing that we have achieved that has been about progress, in particular around civil rights, has come without a fight, and so I always am going to interpret these protests as an essential component of evolution in our country—as an essential component or mark of a real democracy,” the vice presidential nominee said during the NAACP’s national convention.

“She added that protests were “necessary” as “the people’s voices must be heard, and it is often the people who must speak to get their government to do what it is supposed to do, but may not do naturally unless the people speak loudly—and obviously peacefully.”

“Harris also praised the “brilliance” and “impact” of “Black Lives Matter,” which has received media praise but also come under fire for promoting left-wing stances like opposing the nuclear family. “I actually believe that ‘Black Lives Matter’ has been the most significant agent for change within the criminal justice system,” she said.

“Her comments came during mass protests surrounding the deaths of Black Americans like Breonna Taylor, whose case prompted a series of demonstrations earlier this week.”

According to the Fox News report on Harris’  comments to the NAACP national convention, “While the vast majority of demonstrations—which began in late May—have been peaceful, some have resulted in property destruction.”

How can anyone discount the injuries to police and civilians, including children as “peaceful”?

“Footage quickly emerged purportedly showing buildings vandalized and burned in Louisville, Ky., after a grand jury decided to indict just one of the officers involved in Taylor’s death. (Fox News)

“Across the country, violent confrontations during these demonstrations have led to deaths and injuries, including for demonstrators, journalists and police officers.

Why are police officers who were killed and injured listed third after “demonstrators” and “journalists”?

Do the lives of demonstrators and journalists matter more than the lives of police?

 “In Louisville, Kentucky, two officers were shot, and subsequently hospitalized, during protests surrounding Taylor’s case. (Fox News)

“Former Vice President Joe Biden and other Democrats have been criticized for allegedly not doing enough to denounce violent demonstrations, while President’s (sic) Trump campaign has attempted to tie their statements to on-going riots.

“In May, Biden released a statement in which he distinguished between violent and peaceful protests.

“Protesting such brutality is right and necessary. It’s an utterly American response. But burning down communities and needless destruction is not. Violence that endangers lives is not. Violence that guts and shutters businesses that serve the community is not,” the statement read.

“At the end of last month, Sen. Harris similarly said: “We must always defend peaceful protest and peaceful protesters. We should not confuse them with those looting and committing acts of violence, including the shooter who was arrested for murder. Make no mistake, we will not let these vigilantes and extremists derail the path to justice.”

Harris, who praised the “brilliance” and “impact” of “Black Lives Matter,”seems to be confusing “peaceful protesters” with the anarchists burning and looting, Democrat-controlled cities; killing and injuring—not just other demonstrators and journalists—but cops and civilians.

Meanwhile, there can no longer be any doubt about it: The Democrats are ideologically in bed with Black Lives Matter (BLM).

The announcement, was made, in effect, yesterday by Democrat vice presidential candidate Kamala Harris.

You can watch her in action today in the “yell room” when she joins Hanoi Jane Fonda at the Supermajority’s event—titled “Supercharge: Women All In”.

Sep 26 2020

The Heartbreaking Fate of ‘Census Cowboy’s’ Horse


Meanwhile, Hollingsworth’s and Mayor Lightfoot’s stress is nothing compared to that of the little kids who will be heartbroken when they hear the sad fate of the ‘Census Cowboy’s’ horse

Judi McLeod image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—September 26, 2020

The Heartbreaking Fate of ‘Census Cowboy’s’ Horse

Democrat Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot’s personal, handpicked stunt man Adam Hollingsworth, she dubbed as the “Census Cowboy,”  now faces a felony charge for riding his bleeding horse in a Monday ‘protest’ to the point of collapse.

Hollingsworth, who has called on his mayor pal for help, crying out, “Lori, come help me.  “I can’t do it alone”, may have ended his horse-riding publicity stunt, but the real publicity stunt began with Lightfoot and can be seen how in the hideous video below:

The Blaze covered the heartrending story on its site yesterday, reporting that the horse—“which is in critical condition due to its injuries, may now have to be euthanized”.

“Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot (D) tapped Hollingsworth to work with her earlier this year to boost census participation in the city. (The Blaze, Sept. 25, 2020)

“According to a report from WTTW-TV, Hollingsworth rode the horse for more than seven miles on the Dan Ryan Expressway during Monday’s impromptu protest.

“The horse, which was reportedly not outfitted with proper shoes for concrete, collapsed after running for about an hour.

“Cook County prosecutors said the horse’s treatment was the “equivalent of forcing an 80-year-old woman to run a marathon,” WTTW reported.

“Cook County Assistant State’s Attorney Kevin Deboni said that the horse was nearly run to death and suffered “extensive damage” to its health.

Chicago Mayor Unveils New Mascot “Census Cowboy”

“Deboni said that the horse’s eyes “were dilated to the point they looked like cartoon eyes.”

Like most liberals, 33-year-old Hollingsworth moved to virtue signalling as an excuse for his publicity stunt.

“Hollingsworth said that he rode the horse on the Dan Ryan Expressway during rush hour to support the #KidsLivesMatter movement, according to the outlet, which describes the initiative as one “that aims to raise awareness and motivate residents to fill out the census to help communities receive better funding.” (The Blaze)

“According to Block Club Chicago, the movement is in response to children killed by gun violence.

“In August, Hollingsworth told the Block Club, “When you get kids occupied and they’ve got things to do with their time and their life … all this senseless killing that’s going on, it’ll slow down a whole lot. It’s important to support dance groups [or] anything that’s got something to do with kids. If it’s something positive, support it.”

“Witnesses of the Dan Ryan Expressway incident told the outlet that they saw Hollingsworth kicking and whipping the horse to keep it running even after it slowed its pace due to exhaustion and injury. “Shortly after, the horse collapsed on the ground.

“Emergency veterinarians responded to the scene and took the horse in for treatment of severe dehydration, overheating, and lacerations to its front legs that caused heavy bleeding. Authorities took Hollingsworth into custody.

“WFLD-TV reported that the horse also had sores beneath its saddle, which was not properly padded.

“In a statement, Mayor Lightfoot’s office condemned Hollingsworth’s “stunt.”

“There is a right way and a wrong way to call attention to issues of great importance and this stunt was decidedly the very wrong way,” the mayor’s office said in its statement.

“Hollingsworth was charged with a felony count of aggravated cruelty to an animal, as well as misdemeanor counts of reckless conduct, trespassing, and other traffic-related offenses.

“At the time of this reporting, the horse remains in critical condition, and will never be able to be ridden again.

“The horse may also have to be euthanized due to its injuries and “due to the suffering the animal will likely endure for the rest of its life.”

“Hollingsworth was held on $25,000 bond during a Wednesday court appearance, and was required to pay 10%. He is due back in court on Sept. 30.”

“On Thursday, a tearful Hollingsworth told the Chicago Sun-Times that he did not abuse the horse.

“My focus is on the ‘Kids Lives Matter’ because if you look up the history of when it comes down to kids getting killed, 2020 is the highest rate … and it ain’t right,” he told reporters.

“Everybody is trying to steer away from that part, and that is very important — that is an important topic we need to stick on.”

As if Hollingsworth’s attempts at virtue signalling were not hypocritical enough, he added that how he treated the horse now in critical condition was “no different than how horses are treated in the circus or at a racetrack”.

Fight ELITIST SUPPRESSION—Make CFP Your Go-To Home Page!

“The people that don’t know anything about horses looking from the outside in, you would think that what I did was cruelty to animals,” he explained. “But if you go to a racetrack, it’s 100 times worse, if you go to a circus, worse. … It’s way worse than what I do to my horses. I probably could’ve did a little bit less, but I had to make a statement.” (The Blaze)

“He also insisted that the description of the horse’s injuries were exaggerated, and that he would like to appoint an independent veterinarian to examine the horse.

“I think that is just a way to make the situation seem worse than it is because I am a black brother and I am doing very good for the community and standing up for the Kids Lives Matter movement and not focused on anything else,” Hollingsworth reasoned.

“He also revealed that he has been the subject of abuse since his arrest.

“Every day I step outside I am taking a chance with my life,” he said. “I basically look at [the hate mail] and just close them. I can’t change how a person feels.”

He also called upon Lightfoot to defend him.

“When [Mayor Lightfoot] called upon me [to assist with the 2020 census], I was there for her,” he added. “Monday was my stress signal: Lori, come help me, I can’t do it alone.”

Meanwhile, Hollingsworth’s and Mayor Lightfoot’s stress is nothing compared to that of the little kids who will be heartbroken when they hear the sad fate of the ‘Census Cowboy’s’ horse.