Donald Tusk Prepares Poland for War


Posted originally on Mar 11, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Tusk Donald

Prime Minister Donald Tusk is preparing a 500,000-troop army for Poland to protect against Russian aggression. “We will try to have a model ready by the end of the year so that every adult male in Poland is trained for war,” Tusk announced.

“Today, the situation of Poland, objectively and the situation of Ukraine above all, is more difficult than it was a few months ago and we have to deal with this fact,” Tusk mentioned. The current army has around 200,000 members to explain the full scope of Tusk’s plans, which would more than double the current military. The resources for this project are unfounded and a budget has not been presented. Poland already boasts the second-largest army in NATO behind the United States and Turkey. Turkey has an army of around 512,000 troops, so this move will put Poland on par.

“Every adult male” in the nation must undergo military training. Women, for now, are permitted to join on a voluntary basis but many EU nations are forcing women to undergo some form of training as well. Poland is one of the 11 EU nations that will place women in the frontline of fire.

Poland has already increased its NATO spending to 4.2% of GDP in 2024, and plans to up that amount to 4.7% ($48 billion) in 2025. Now the European Union initiated proceedings against Poland in July 2024 for its growing deficit. Poland has been the largest recipient of EU funds, but these funds come with increasing political conditions, particularly regarding judicial reforms, climate policies, and social policies like DEI mandates. Other members of both NATO and the EU refuse to up their defense budgets while encouraging Poland to spend more out of fear of proximity.

Poles are divided on the issue, with at least half stating they do not need to be involved in Ukraine’s conflict. A February 2025 survey by Ukrainska Pravda found a growing negative attitude toward Ukrainians over the past year, with 27% to 30% of respondents having a negative view of Ukraine compared to 23% to 25% last year. Younger Poles are less likely to have a favorable view of Ukraine, with only 16% stating they viewed Ukraine favorably. Reports state that older Poles are simply more empathetic, but they are not the ones who will be expected to die on behalf of Ukraine.

In November 2024, 55% of Poles said they supported ending the war even if Ukraine was forced to surrender territory. That same survey found only 24% in favor of such measures back in November 2022, before the war escalated to a full-scale proxy war. Opposition to continually providing Ukraine with military and humanitarian aid is continuing to rise.

Then there is the issue of refugees. While 53% support accepting Ukrainians into Poland, 67% believe Tusk must send back all military-aged men.

Poland is preparing for war. Leaders use the rhetoric of the past to claim that their nation could be invaded yet again and claimed by a foreign actor. The only actor who is stirring the pot is Zelensky, who, per instructions, has been encouraging his EU allies to fight Russia head-on. The majority of fighting-aged men in Poland DO NOT WANT WAR, nor do they deserve to die in these neocon war games.

Meloni Asks to Extend NATO Protections to Ukraine


Posted originally on Mar 11, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Zelensky Meloni

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni is ready for World War III. Meloni does not support Ukraine joining NATO, but she would like to offer Ukraine NATO’s collective security protections, including Article 5, which states that an attack on one is an attack on all.

Stationing European troops in Ukraine under the premise of keeping the peace is not an option, according to Meloni, as there is no peace to be kept amid the escalating war. “UN peacekeeping missions are a different matter, but this is a completely different topic, because such missions are deployed when the peace process has already begun. That is not what is currently being discussed, and I remain very skeptical about such proposals,” she noted. At least the deployed troops will know precisely why they are there, as peace is not the end goal.

“This is not the same as joining NATO, but it would provide Ukraine with the same security umbrella that NATO countries have. It would ensure stable, long-term, and real security guarantees – more than some of the proposals I see now. That is one of the ideas we are putting forward,” Meloni stated.

Ukraine would not need to pay into the alliance under this premise. They would receive “the same security umbrella” as members who have been paying into the alliance for many years. Nothing about this proposal benefits Europe, but it does benefit the neocons in NATO who would have total control over Ukraine’s military strategy under this plan of action.

This is a guaranteed way to begin the next World War regardless of how one deciphers Article 5. Article 5 is deliberately vague, but it does state that each member will assist “by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary.” Therefore, each member would decide how to implement Article 5 for the second time in NATO history.

911

We saw Article 5 enacted after 9/11, but that did not mean all NATO members were sending troops to the Middle East. Some NATO members sent their air forces to patrol US airspace. NATO naval forces were sent to the Eastern Mediterranean Sea, while other NATO nations sent troops to Afghanistan to fight alongside American soldiers. The alliance began sharing intelligence with one another in a more robust way and developed a Terrorist Threat Unit. The coalition pledged a mere $700 million in aid to America after the most significant attack on US soil.

WW3_fears_explode_as_Putin warns US within range nukes

If Ukraine were awarded this blanket security protection, Russia would not simply surrender and lose its land to NATO and the West. Russia is a nuclear power and Moscow is not against going to extremes to save its nation. Moscow has stated countless times that it feels it is fighting NATO rather than Ukraine, and it would even consider PEACE if NATO backed down and Ukraine returned some historically Russian territories. This plan would provide NATO with full control over Ukraine who would not have a say in any decision-making measures as it is not a member. Effectively, Meloni is suggesting that NATO take over this fight on behalf of Ukraine to achieve the ultimate long con goal of seizing Russia.

Do You Accept Zelensky as Your Saviour?


Posted originally on Mar 11, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Starmer Aceept Zelensky as Savior
2025_03_10_21_37_48_Starmer_knows_Ukraine_must_avoid_a_ceasefire_in_any_peace_talks_and_it_will_te

Based on information and belief, Zelensky will not agree to any ceasefire to end the war. Europe is gearing up very rapidly. They are on the verge of a major debt crisis and desperately need a distraction. We must be concerned about a false flag to influence the elections in Poland on May 18th. Our model of the Ukraine War against Russia turns back up on May 15th. They are not about to accept peace from the rumblings behind the curtain right now.

War Destruction 1

Europe 2029

 Trump Must Cut ALL Ties With Europe – They are Controlled by the Neocons

UK, EU and NATO Partners Launch Massive Wave of Drone Attacks Against Moscow


Posted originally on CTH on March 11, 2025 | Sundance

Approximately 60 drones were launched from Ukraine overnight to attack the Russian capital city of Moscow.  This is the largest escalation of drone/missile attacks into Russia so far.

The attack comes, predictably, as Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Nat Sec Advisor Mike Waltz and President Trump envoy Steve Witkoff arrive in Saudi Arabia for preliminary face-to-face talks with Ukraine officials. The pattern repeats.

Each time President Trump’s diplomatic team are scheduled to meet with Russia or Ukraine officials in their quest to stop the bloodshed, the intelligence apparatus in control of the NATO proxy war triggers an escalating disruption targeting Russia.

Hitting Moscow with a wave of 60 drones is a major escalation, because face-to-face meetings with U.S and Ukraine officials are at a critical inflection point.  Each uptick in the offensive action from Ukraine is directly proportional to the increased seriousness of the peace talks.

(VIA AP) – A total of 69 Ukrainian drones targeting the Russian capital were shot down in a massive attack on Tuesday morning, Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin said.

The attack, the biggest targeting Moscow in months, came as a Ukrainian delegation was set to meet with America’s top diplomat in Saudi Arabia about ending the three-year war with Russia.

At least 11 of the drones were shot down in the Ramensky and Domodedovo districts of the Moscow region surrounding the Russian capital, Sobyanin said on the messaging app Telegram. He didn’t specify where the other drones were shot down, noting only that they were “flying towards Moscow.”

The governor of the Moscow region, Andrei Vorobyov, said that one person was killed and three more wounded as the result of the drone attack. The attack damaged seven apartments in a residential building in the Ramensky district, he said.

Sobyanin said the roof of a building in Moscow also sustained damage, which he described as “insignificant.”

Flights have been restricted in and out of three Moscow airports, including Domodedovo and Zhukovsky to the south and southeast of the city and Sheremetyevo to the north, according to Russian civil aviation authority Rosaviatsia.

Train traffic through the Domodedovo railway station also has been halted, local officials reported. (link)

At first review it seems like the terrain mapping component of the targeting system was not accurate or in place. Hence, unless NATO was intentionally targeting residential buildings, just like the attacks in Kazan some of the drones hit civilian high-rise buildings on the way to Moscow airport.

However, don’t get lost in the weeds on this.  60+ drones launched against Russia’s largest city is intended to draw a major retaliation from Russian President Vladimir Putin, that is what the UK/EU and NATO apparatus want.  The Zelenskyy people want Russia to attack Kiev so they can enlarge the scale and scope of U.S. involvement.

I sincerely hope President Trump is on the phone with President Putin, and I hope Trump’s instructions to Rubio, Waltz and Witkoff are to put fierce pressure on Ukraine at the meeting in Saudi Arabia.

Only through strong, extreme and even perhaps vicious diplomacy, is Ukraine going to be brought to heel.  The EU and NATO must also suffer strong geopolitical consequences for their efforts to disrupt any effort at peace.

The pretending must stop.  Each time the UK/EU/NATO team use Ukraine to escalate the fight, the EU and NATO must pay a price.  The American people need to understand what the dynamic really is here, even if it eventually means President Trump calling it out directly.

Canada’s Next Leftist Prime Minister Vows to Defeat President Trump and Win Trade War


Posted originally on CTH on March 10, 2025 | Sundance

Canadian leftists have selected Mark Carney as their replacement for Justin Trudeau, Carney will be sworn in as Prime Minister shortly and complete the remaining segment of Trudeau’s term before new Canadian elections.

The only issue on the mind of voters in Canada is which candidate will fight U.S. President Donald Trump the hardest.  Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre has vowed to fight Trump harder than Mark Carney, but the leftists in Canada are now back on the ascendency and will dispatch the pontificating Poilievere shortly.

During his acceptance speech at the Liberal Party convention, a beaming Mark Carney promised to defeat President Trump and the Americans in the upcoming trade war.  Carney noted, a sense of national pride has swept across Canada as the people unite in their hatred for everything Trump and everything American associated with him.  WATCH: 

In addition to tariffs against Canadian goods and services, U.S. President Trump has massive economic arrows in his quiver that can be deployed against the Canadian economy.  Measures including larger tariffs (tariff reciprocity), financial sanctions, restrictions on Canadian investment in the USA, revocation of visa-free border crossing, forced divestiture of American asset holdings for the Canadian people (banking reciprocity), all the way to a full-throated embargo of all goods and travel from Canada are potential.

If that sequence of events ever happened, the Canadian government led by Prime Minister Mark Carney has vowed to respond in kind to Trump with identical action blocking any/all USA products, services and American citizens from entry into Canada.  This approach would enable us to finally determine which nationalistic outlook will survive, Canada or the USA.

(Via Politico) – […] One of Carney’s first decisions will be whether or not to call a snap election in the middle of a trade war. He has identified Trump’s rolling tariff threats as an “economic and sovereign crisis.”

“The Americans want our resources, our water, our land, our country,” Carney said. “Think about it. If they succeed, they will destroy our way of life.”

Carney campaigned for the top job on his reputation as a disaster manager, arguing that he is the right person to take on Trump. He ran for the leadership against former Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland, who has warned that how Canada deals with the president “will define us for a generation, and perhaps longer.”

Trump now tops the list of things Canadians are worried about, followed by jobs, inflation and the economy. About 90 percent of Canadians live within 150 miles of the U.S. border, and polls show the country of 40 million is increasingly angry at the U.S. president, who can’t seem to stop talking about annexing Canada. (read more)

These next few weeks and months could be very interesting.

Romania Has Barred Leading Candidate Calin Georgescu from Postponed Presidential Election


Posted originally on CTH on March 10, 2025 | Sundance

There is a long and incredible backstory {GO DEEP} However, a Romanian “constitutional court” has now rejected the leading presidential candidate calin Georgescu from running for President.

As outlined by Reuters, “Romania’s central election authority said on Sunday it had decided to bar Georgescu’s candidacy, saying it was inadmissible after the Constitutional Court’s annulment of the December vote.”

Georgescu won the majority of the vote in December; however, after certifying the first round of the election, the court in Romania then heard a secret report from the EU intelligence system that claimed the candidate received some mysterious election support from Russia (never disclosed or validated), thereby establishing a predicate to annul the election outcome.

The court annulled the election outcome, set up a new election in May and now bans Georgescu from participating. Georgescu is a nationalist, and his ideological outlook is the exact opposite of what the EU want to see. As a consequence, appeals were made to Brussels to intervene and simultaneously inside Romania the election results were thrown out.

BUCHAREST (Reuters) -Romanian far-right presidential contender Calin Georgescu said on Monday he would challenge a decision to bar him from taking part in an election rerun in May, but analysts said his chances of standing were slim amid fears of Russian meddling.

The dispute over Georgescu’s candidacy is firing up tensions both at home and abroad. A small group of his supporters smashed pavements and set rubbish bins ablaze in Bucharest on Sunday, while Elon Musk, a key adviser to U.S. President Donald Trump, branded the decision to bar Georgescu “crazy”.

[…] “It’s a disgrace to the leadership of this country. You see that Mr Georgescu has different opinions and that’s why they didn’t accept him,” said Bucharest resident Victoria who declined to give her last name.

Challenges to decisions by Romania’s central election authority must be filed within 24 hours. The Constitutional Court should rule on Georgescu’s appeal by Wednesday.

Analysts have said it is unlikely that the top court will allow Georgescu to run again for the presidency.

The court set a precedent in October when it blocked the candidacy of another far-right candidate, arguing that her anti-European, pro-Russian views made her unfit for office. (read more)

Vice-President JD Vance previously drew attention to the Romanian “democracy” decrying the ridiculous decision to throw out the election result just because a candidate the court deemed did not express the right thinking won the election.

“There is no security if you are afraid of the voices of your own people,” Vance said.  Continuing, “if you are running in fear of your own voters, there is nothing the American people can do to assist you.”

3.9.25: Strategic Crypto Reserve, COMEX Silver contract, plus extra info on P!ZS0G@TE, PRAY!


Posted originally on Rumble By And We Know on: March 9, 2025 at 2:00 am EST

Columbia Loses $400M Grant


Posted originally on Mar 10, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Hamas Soldiers

The First Amendment is designed to protect peaceful expression and assembly. It does not protect against civil disobedience or inciting violence. According to the new president, America will no longer fund schools that permit “illegal protests,” with an emphasis on universities that permit pro-Hamas rallies. The question remains whether a protest can be deemed “illegal” under 1A.

The Education Department announced on Friday that it canceled a $400 million grant to Columbia University due to “inaction in the face of persistent harassment of Jewish students.” Columbia University has become a battleground for faux philanthropists who wish to deliberately create civil unrest.

Protest.CivilUnrest.Palestine.TENTS_.greentent

Last May, CNN reported that many of the “students” arrested at Columbia and City College of New York had no affiliation with either school. The New York Police Department arrested 282 people, and only 148 (a bit over half) were real students. Protestors across most major liberal universities not so coincidentally had identical tents in place. “Students,” many of whom chose to wear COVID-era masks, all received instructional booklets on how to protest. Columbia, Harvard, Yale, and many others stood idle and allowed this to occur on its grounds.

StagedAgitatorsCivilUnrestPalestine

As reported by Fox, Sami Al-Arian, a known terrorist who was once deported, advised associates and his wife to camp out along with the college students at Columbia. This man is admittedly associated with the Palestinian Islamic Jihad group. He has taken to social media to promote the civil unrest across American universities. This is a clear and REAL threat to national security. Again, these students are too naive to understand the root cause of these issues or the truly dangerous actors fueling the flames.

The “Catch and Revoke” plan to deport students linked to Hamas protests is a necessary measure to protect law and order. “Those who support designated terrorist organizations, including Hamas, threaten our national security. The United States has zero tolerance for foreign visitors who support terrorists,” Secretary of State Marco Rubio declared. A visa means you are a guest in a foreign nation and should respect the law of whatever country you choose to visit or study within.  It is a privilege to enter the US on a student visa, not a right.

StudentBrainwashedCollege

Authorities sent to break up university protests reported that they believed a larger group orchestrated the protests. We have the likes of George Soros and his son Alex, who are known to pay actors to incite civil unrest. But worse, we had a known terrorist camping out at an American university. The identical instruction booklets, tents, and chants across American schools point to a larger organization at the helm, be it foreign influencers like Soros or actual terrorist organizations.

“Since October 7, Jewish students have faced relentless violence, intimidation, and anti-Semitic harassment on their campuses — only to be ignored by those who are supposed to protect them,” Education Secretary Linda McMahon said. “Universities must comply with all federal antidiscrimination laws if they are going to receive federal funding. For too long, Columbia has abandoned that obligation to Jewish students studying on its campus. Today, we demonstrate to Columbia and other universities that we will not tolerate their appalling inaction any longer,” she added.

Imagine permitting “students” to support known hate groups like the KKK. They’re peacefully wearing their ridiculous pillowcase masks, so let’s simply ignore the overall message of pure hate and chalk it up to free speech. How is it any different when we have a group chanting that Israel should not exist as a nation? Jewish students are reportedly afraid to walk around on campus in America because we are allowing children to cosplay as terrorists. There is a reason that 1A does not protect someone, say, running into a movie theatre and shouting, “FIRE!” We can speak freely, but that does not entail engaging in unlawful behavior that hurts others. It is a shame that the government had to step in to restore common sense here.

BlackLivesMatter.Hamas_

An investigation needs to be conducted to see who is truly behind these protests. Someone is deliberately orchestrating these events to cause upheaval and division. The far left turned a blind eye to what could be protected under the First Amendment during the Black Lives Matter protests. They permitted angry mobs to burn down cities and small businesses without repercussion. They even changed the laws in many states to legalize looting under a specific dollar amount. Oh, and the government funded the completely corrupt organization with public funds. Enough is enough.

These university protests were likely not orchestrated by students, and it’s perhaps unfair to deem these events protests. Again, whoever is directing these young adults to throw on a keffiyeh and chant “TO THE RIVER TO THE SEA” has sinister motives, and it is worth a closer investigation. Why should federal funds be sent to Columbia University when it permits antisemitism and hosts actual terrorists on its campus?

Has Canada Been Compromised?


Posted originally on Mar 9, 2025 by Martin Armstrong |  

Globalist Seized Control of Canada – Mark Carney


Posted originally on Mar 9, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Carney Mark WEF

Globalist and WEF compadre and former central banker Mark Carney took 86% of votes to become leader of Canada’s ruling party. Carney will succeed Justin Trudeau as prime minister, who announced his resignation after nine years in power. Carney has argued that he was best placed to oversee trade negotiations with Donald Trump and said he would keep retaliatory tariffs in place until “the Americans show us respect.” This ensured that Schwab would still retain control over Canadian politics.

Canada 10yr M 3 9 25

The Liberals announced Carney as Justin Trudeau’s successor on Sunday after party members voted in a nominating contest. Carney was at Goldman Sachs for 13 years before being named deputy governor of the Bank of Canada in 2003. He left in November 2004 for a top finance ministry job and returned to become central bank governor in 2008. He is well aware of the market manipulations of the NY bankers. He infuriated Brexit supporters by talking about the economic damage he said would likely be caused by leaving the European Union. He was wrong about that. After leaving the Bank of England in 2020, Carney served as a United Nations envoy on finance and climate change. He does not bring independence to Canada, but more of the same, which is why the Liberals handed him the PM position. Our model is projecting war in EUROPE and rising interest rates in Canada.