Yellen’s Legacy as US Treasury Secretary – A Study in Bidenomics


Posted originally on Nov 26, 2024 by Martin Armstrong 

Yellen Sec Treasury

Janet Yellen will finally step down from her role as Treasury Secretary in January, leaving a massive mess for her replacement, Scott Bessent. The budget deficit surpassed $36 trillion under the Biden-Harris Administration, with Yellen touting that the US had an endless supply of funds to spend and imaginary success of Bidenomics.

As head of the Federal Reserve under Obama, Yellen was an outspoken advocate for QE. She worked closely with Bernanke and Greenspan, but is actually considered the main architect of the Fed’s now dead quantitative easing program that began in December of 2008. “Potentially anything – including negative interest rates – would be on the table. But we would have to study carefully how they would work here in the U.S. context,” Yellen argued back in 2015. This academic and longtime Fed insider spent her career pandering to the White House.

Perhaps part of her legacy as America’s CFO under Biden-Harris would be her insistence that inflation was “transitory.” Yellen called the US debt downgrade “arbitrary” when Fitch Ratings downgraded US long-term debt late from AAA to AA+.

She never spoke as an authority on economics, but rather, she spoke as if she were a puppet of the WEF implanted in government to spread economic-related propaganda. Yellen is akin to the Karine Jean-Pierre of America’s financial system insofar as her job is to openly lie to the public and convince them that their reality is not as it seems.

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen is proof that the establishment is completely clueless when it comes to the lives of the average citizen. “People are better off than they were pre-pandemic,” Yellen touted on national news last week. Perhaps she meant to say “politicians” rather than people, and no, one cannot point at rising US indexes and claim that is sufficient evidence that the overall economy is sound.

Despite millions of Americans struggling financially amid inflation in the post-pandemic landscape, Yellen had the audacity to claim that most Americans are happy with their financial situation despite every bit of data indicating otherwise. “So, they seem to perceive the economy as a whole as doing less well than they are personally. But most Americans feel good about their own economic situation.”

Yellen insisted that inflation was under control. Completely out of touch, Yellen even denied the prevalence of food inflation. “I think largely it reflects cost increases, including labor cost increases that grocery firms have experienced, although there may be some increases in margins,” Yellen, who has a net worth of $20 million, stated before advocating centralized agriculture.

Yet, she promoted every major spending package Biden signed off on. Yellen was the first to admit the true reason behind the Inflation Reduction Act, the largest spending package in US history, was to propel the climate change agenda. “The Inflation Reduction Act is, at its core, about turning the climate crisis into an economic opportunity,” Yellen admitted.

Biden Yellen

Biden later admitted that the bill was never intended to reduce inflation. “We should have named it what it was!” Biden said at an event in Westby, Wisconsin, where he unsuccessfully attempted to tout the success of Bidenomics. The president referred to the Inflation Reduction Act as “the most significant CLIMATE CHANGE LAW ever,” adding, “by the way, it is a $369 billion bill, it’s called the–we we we should’ve named it what it was.”

BUILD BACK BETTER

Janet Yellen declared that it will take $3 TRILLION ANNUALLY into 2050 for nations to meet their climate objectives. They deem climate change “the single-greatest economic opportunity of the 21st century,” but logical minds will see it as the biggest economic obligation. “Neglecting to address climate change and the loss of nature and biodiversity is not just bad environmental policy. It is bad economic policy,” Yellen told the G20. Not one member objected or questioned her proposal.

The most inflationary driver is war, but Yellen insisted that America could fund not one but two proxy wars. “America can certainly afford to stand with Israel and to support Israel’s military needs, and we also can and must support Ukraine in its struggle against Russia. The American economy is doing extremely well,” Yellen said. Despite the endless blank checks, Janet Yellen insisted that America has not done enough for Ukraine.

Unbothered by the growing deficit, Yellen’s plan all along was to mobilize the Internal Revenue Service to hunt down American citizens. She was an advocate for tracking all transactions above $600 to ensure not a penny went unaccounted for. Yellen praised the Biden-Harris regime for “giving the Internal Revenue Service the resources that they need to close what is estimated over the next decade to be a $7 trillion tax gap.” The IRS could confiscate all of our wealth, but it would still not be enough to pay off the growing deficit and the costs of financing that deficit.

Yellen Debt

Many have criticized how she chose to finance the deficit. An estimated 30% of US debt is held in short-term bonds, doubling the amount held in the short-term since 2023. This debt must be refinanced at likely higher rates compared to if she locked 10- and 30-year bonds at historically low rates. Yet, that would have shown the public that Bidenomics was not working, as consumers would have felt the blow firsthand. At the same time, we have seen China offload massive amounts of US debt under Biden. Yellen begs China to continue purchasing and then turns around and agrees with the neocons that we must defend Taiwan – oh, but please continue purchasing the debt of your enemy.

Janet Yellen has left an utter mess for the next US Treasury secretary. One must wonder if this was a calculated move to paint Bidenomics in a positive light before he and his cabinet fled for the hills. Our models indicated that 2024 is the peak in foreign holdings of US debt, nearly 24% of the total debt. So, if you are paying $1 trillion in interest, about $230 billion is going outside the country, and there is no domestic stimulation factor whatsoever. Thanks to the failure of monetary and fiscal policies, notably stemming before Bidenomics, Socrates has stated that the national debt will surpass $100 trillion by 2027/2029. Not to worry as our current form of government is indeed “arbitrary” and “transitory.”

U.K and France in Discussions to Send NATO Troops Into Ukraine


Posted originally on the CTH on November 25, 2024 | Sundance 

With around 50 days remaining to stir up as much trouble as possible, and with around 50 days of strategic activity left in order to Trump-proof the UE coalition of the NATO alliance, the U.K and France are in “classified” discussions about sending their troops into Ukraine before President Trump takes office.

It should be remembered that President Barack Obama did not want to intervene in Libya, circa 2011.  That was a decision made by The U.S. State Department and CIA, pushed by Hillary Clinton, Samantha Power and Director Leon Panetta, and ultimately, militarily, executed by NATO Commander Admiral James Stavridis.  And yes, Libya was not a threat to NATO…. but it happened anyway.

The U.K recently signed a mutual defense agreement with Moldova, promising to come to their aid if conflict with Russia escalated into the country.  Now we see reports of the U.K traveling to France to create a two-party coalition within the larger NATO assembly, intended to send military troops into Ukraine.

Is an attack against allied troops analogous with an attack against a NATO member?  Before you answer that question, remind yourself of the justification for the reference Libya intervention, the infamous “Responsibility To Protect” or R2P.  Now, using that framework, revisit the question.  I digress.

Le Monde – […] As the conflict in Ukraine enters a new phase of escalation, discussions over sending Western troops and private defense companies to Ukraine have been revived, Le Monde has learned from corroborating sources. These are sensitive discussions, most of which are classified – relaunched in light of a potential American withdrawal of support for Kyiv once Donald Trump takes office on January 20, 2025.

The debate about sending troops to Ukraine, which French President Emmanuel Macron initiated at a meeting between Kyiv’s allies in Paris in February, was strongly opposed by some European countries, led by Germany. However, it was relaunched in recent weeks thanks to the visit to France of the UK prime minister, Keir Starmer, for the November 11th commemorations. “Discussions are underway between the UK and France on defense cooperation, particularly with a view to creating a hard core of allies in Europe, focused on Ukraine and wider European security,” confided a British military source to Le Monde. (read more)

Almost all modern “western” wars are bankers’ wars.  To understand the activity, it is worth paying attention to who is the benefactor and who is the beneficiary in the Corporate/Government relationship.

History does not always repeat; however, it is almost guaranteed to rhyme.

Info on Dnipro


Posted originally on Nov 24, 2024 by Martin Armstrong 

Sources from Ukraine confirm that Dnipro (Dnipropetrovsk) Ukraine was a major facility for Ukraine to manufacture missiles from Western components and relabel them “made in Ukraine” to shelter the Western suppliers in the NATO war against Russia. The Russian ICBM attack utterly destroyed the Yuzhmash manufacturing, which was an industrial giant even from the days of the USSR. It made rockets during the former USSR and intercontinental missiles for the USSR. According to sources, the Yuzhmash plant no longer exists.

Most of the facility was underground. Ukraine was manufacturing drones and rocket engines. This is where they assembled their weapons. There were three floors underground, each 6 meters high. Zelensky never thought Russia could possibly destroy this operation—but it has.

While this was just a conventional weapon, the impact was so powerful that buildings for several kilometers from the plant shook and suffered damage. Because this facility was underground, all the pipes for the water supply in the city have been destroyed. Messages have gotten out, and the resident commented that it felt like an earthquake.n Keep in mind this was devastating yet it was still just conventional. They could also deploy six nuclear warheads. Those hiding in bunkers are no longer safe during nuclear war,

Despite the Western Press still preaching the Neocon propaganda, emergency meetings reflect that this is a very serious development for warfare. Putin could have easily taken out Europe and American nuclear capability if he really wanted to conquer Europe, but he has been against turning this into World War III.

Paulo Figueiredo Breaks Down The Globalist Indictment Against Bolsonaro And His Allies


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on Nov 23, 2024 at 7:30 pm EST

Why the NEOCONs prevent World Leaders from Meeting with Putin


Posted originally on Nov 22, 2024 by Martin Armstrong 

Poker Game Bluffing

QUESTION: Would you meet with Putin?

DI

ANSWER: The Neocons will NOT allow Biden to call Putin and certainly not meet with him. Why? If you play poker with someone you never met, exactly how would you know if they were bluffing or not? I would meet with Karl Marx. One thing my father taught me is that it is NEVER what you think; it is what your opponent thinks. Just look at Iran. You have to understand their version of Islam if you hope to comprehend what is and is not possible. It would be best if you met with an adversary, or you would never understand what to do.

Sun Su Art of War Know Your Enemy

The reason the NEOCONS prevent world leaders from meeting with Putin is because they are afraid there might be peace. This goes against every possible strategy in geopolitics. This is why the Neocons has waged endless wars and never won any since World War II. They demonize their opponents but never try to understand them. Preventing Biden from even talking to Putin is totally insane, and clearly, it is strategic to prevent Biden from ever looking into the eyes of Putin.

2022 The Plot to Seize Russia

I have been warning that Putin is NOT bluffing. The Neocons know that but will not be honest with anyone. I was in the middle of the whole Russian plot where Hillary tried to pull off a regime change in 2000 with the bankers and wrote about it with the declassified documents from the Clinton Administration. Why do you think Hillary started RussiaGate,? She assumed Putin retaliated because of that 2000 regime change attempt on Russia. I was asked to put in $10 billion to fund Hermitage Capital. I refused. Their puppet Boris Berezovsky even called to try to convince me to put in the money, and we would be the next President of Russia.

Serbia Putin is Not Bluffing

I had a meeting with someone from the former Yugoslavia who is familiar with my work in that region. They, too, commented how they feared that if Putin was not there, the Communists would seize power again, and it would be far worse. Every Eastern European I know who came to America knows the same issue.

Putin cannot appear to be weak. He MUST take some action of the Russian Neocons will seek their regime change, and we will have nukes flying everywhere. Let me explain one thing. If Russia launched nukes at the USA, they would not fly over Europe and the Atlantic. They will come over the top of the globe. That is the shortest distance. That is why the US has maintained a base there to monitor the skies at Thule Air Base, established in 1941 to monitor the Germans initially.

Europe’s Welfare State at Risk


Posted originally on Nov 22, 2024 by Martin Armstrong 

RISK 1

European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde has warned that Europe’s bolstering welfare state is at risk due to its declining economic environment. Lagarde said the EU “will not be able to generate the wealth we will need to meet our rising spending needs to ensure our security, combat climate change and protect the environment.”

Rather than considering whether these measures are essential, Lagarde believes that the European Union must work to integrate all member state economies into one to prevent “fragmenting into rival blocs, where attitudes toward free trade are being called into question.” A unified Europe to end all wars with a uniform currency. The euro was doomed to fail from the onset. Everything from failing to consolidate member debt to ignoring sovereignty spelled trouble.

The structure of the euro is fundamentally flawed. To put it in American terms, it would be  as if all fifty states were able to issue federal bonds. It would be total, absolute chaos. To be politically correct, they said that since every member issues its own federal-type bonds, they all have to be reserves, and the large banks have to fairly allocate them among themselves.

Lately, we have seen European policies come under fire amid the Ukraine war. Some members want to ship off as much in aid as permitted, while others want to hold off. Some members want to focus on national security while others support open borders. Europe The entire premise of creating the European Union was really to eliminate democracy —  those in Brussels are unelected and above each member’s elected officials. On nation can say they don’t want to fund climate change initiatives but it matters not as the EU forces its will on everyone.

“We can no longer see ourselves as a loose club of independent economies,” Lagarde warned. Yet, Europe is a continent of vastly different and proud cultures. You cannot force a German to hold the same ideals as a Greek or expect every member nation to blindly agree to whatever proposal comes down from the unelected officials in Brussels.

There are so many fundamentals working against the EU from social to geopolitical issues. Socrates indicated a panic cycle and high volatility coming into play in the euro around 2026 and into 2027. We see a massive turning point in 2029, and although I hate to be the bearer of bad news, I simply do not see how the euro or European Union can survive. CENTRALIZED CONTROL NEVER WORKS!

Biden Gifts $4.7 Billion to Ukraine


Posted originally on Nov 22, 2024 by Martin Armstrong 

Biden and Zelensky

Joe Biden and the entire neocon establishment are working overtime to spur World War III before Trump takes office in January. Biden announced that he would “forgive” $4.7 billion to Ukraine that was initially intended to be a mere loan.

Now, Congress approved a $61 billion Ukraine aid package in April. Kyiv agreed to pay back all but $9.4 billion of that loan. However, the bill had a hidden clause that permitted the debt to be forgiven in its entirety before 2026.

“Sadly, the Ukraine 1st, America Last Caucus defeated my resolution,” Senator Rand Paul stated on Wednesday after attempting to block Biden from forgiving the debt. State Department spokesman Matthew Miller felt confident that US representatives would pass the bill as both parties support this endless war.

They’ve already permitted Ukraine to use long-range missiles from the US, resulting in an embassy temporarily closing in Russia after rumors swirled of a potential air raid attack. The embassy has reopened, but relations between Russia and the US are deteriorating quickly.

Zelensky went on to explain that the “coming weeks will be crucial for our diplomatic efforts with various partners in Europe, America, and the Global South,” suggesting he was taking orders from the Western neocons who he sold out his nation to for 30 pieces of silver. They are attempting to leave Trump with the most chaotic situation to tackle domestically and internationally. The question remains: How much damage can Joe Biden and his handlers do before January 20?

Will Ukraine Split?


Posted Nov 22, 2024 by Martin Armstrong 
Ukraine SSplit

Ukrainian intelligence agencies released a serious claim that the Russian Ministry of Defense leaked the Kremlin’s final plan for Ukraine that involves separating the nation into three territoriesInterfax Ukraine News states that their source will propose the divided territories to Donald Trump once he enters the White House, with plans taking until 2045 to achieve.

Although no one can confirm this information with certainty, the proposal—which no one will accept—is quite interesting. To begin, Russia will absorb the eastern regions, including but not limited to currently Russian-occupied territories.

The second territory, the “pro-Russian state entity,” would not be within Russia but rather a Russian-controlled state. The third portion of land would be considered “disputed territory” that neighboring nations like Romania, Hungary, and Poland could absorb as they see fit.

The alleged leaked document also envisions two possible scenarios for victory over Ukraine. Scenario one is the “formation of a multipolar world and the division of spheres of influence by leading actors,” while scenario two is “regionalization/chaotization.” The press has not revealed the exact nature of either scenario, but in both cases, Russia will take back the land that started this entire conflict.

There are also two unfavorable scenarios: “dominance of the U.S. and the West” and “acquisition by China of the status of the world’s leading power.” A situation where China usurps Ukraine for itself is quite amusing.

The documents allegedly state that “one of the most important tasks is to create a new world order.” That has NEVER been the intention. I must say this all sounds like fearmongering for the West. Kyiv Intendentreported Russia has been attempting to overpower the US and post-World War II global financial system. These claims are completely baseless and have no footing in reality. Russia has begged to be accepted into the international community for purposes of cooperation and trade for decades, long before Putin was appointed by Yeltsin. Russia was a shunned nation long before Ukraine or even Crimea for that matter. Putin has been pleading with West for its very existence – but the answer is always NO.

Harnwell: Thanks to Trump, EU leaders got some ‘splainin’ to do to their own peoples over Ukraine


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on Nov 20, 2024 at 8:00 pm EST

Nigel Farage Discusses Mass Migration In The West And The Importance Of Diego Garcia Island


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on Nov 20, 2024 at 8:00 pm EST