The joke running around is that Putin should be nominated for the 2022 Nobel Prize in Medicine for he cured COVID-19 in 48 hrs – something nobody else has been able to do in 3 years. Just hours before Biden’s State of the Union, he rescinded the mask requirement. So just hours before, you would get COVID if you did not have a mask. Thanks to Putin, suddenly Congress could actually meet without masks. That is something nobody else could have done in a matter of hours.
Posted originally on the conservative tree house on March 3, 2022 | Sundance
The BRICS alliance is a strategic geopolitical partnership between Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. The nature of the alliance is based on trade and big picture economics.
Readers familiar with our discussions of trade and international finance, will remember the importance we previously discussed with BRICS after the 2016 election and President Trump representing economic nationalism for the first time in several generations. In this outline, we are going to share the bigger picture of why BRICS should now be back on the center stage of American focus.
Xi Jinping (China), Vladimir Putin (Russia), Jair Bolsonaro (Brazil), Narendra Modi (India) and Cyril Ramaphosa (South Africa), the BRICS group.
The BRICS economic partnership was formed during the Obama administration. Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS) saw President Obama sub-contracting, actually giving away, U.S. trade policy to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. In the aftermath of the 2007 economic crisis created by the financial system, the BRICS group connected two central points that concerned them.
In the aftermath of the great housing/financial crisis, the relationships around the World Bank (WB), International Monetary Fund (IMF), EU central banking system and various multinational institutions and, more importantly, multinational corporations, merged even closer with the government. The priorities of the Davos and World Economic Forum (WEF) crowd were now virtually indistinguishable from many national governments.
We are fifteen years downstream from that inflection point, and we are now seeing the outcomes. The WEF is now giving direct instructions to installed politicians for government policy. Put another way, multinational corporations are now telling government officials what to do.
Think of “The Great Reset” or “Build Back Better” or climate change, as examples. Worse yet, those governments are doing exactly what the WEF has told them to do.
This corporate control of government is exactly what the BRICS assembly foresaw when they first assembled. When multinational corporations run the policy of western government, there is going to be a problem. In the bigger picture, the BRICS assembly are essentially leaders who do not want corporations and multinational banks running their government.
As a result, if you really boil it down to the common denominator what you find is the BRICS group are the opposing element to the WEF assembly.
BRICS are not against capitalism in its original form; the BRICS assembly is against corporatism controlling the outcome of government policy. The leaders of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa joined together in order to make sure their subset of economic power put government at the top of the control and power dynamic, and multinational corporations under them. This is their essential commonality.
President Obama and the people around him from Hyde Park were/are domestically focused ideologues. Much has been written about them, and we will not repeat. However, the lesser emphasized point of the Obama era is how issues that touched on foreign policy were subcontracted to others.
Foreign policy was not a central focus for the Chicago team. They were laser focused on fundamental change inside the United States. Their aspirations were to reduce the geopolitical status of the U.S. on the world stage in the same view as an anti-colonialist would seek to break up the British colonial power structures. This is an important reference point often missed.
Hillary Clinton could essentially manage the State Dept as she wanted as long as the overarching intent of the Obama policy was maintained. Spreading the wealth, diminishing the U.S. role of influence, and raising up the rest of the world was the only objective of Obama foreign policy.
Obama took that same outlook toward U.S. strategic trade interests. This is why President Obama subcontracted trade policy to the President of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Tom Donohue (pictured above).
During President Obama’s terms in office, the U.S. CoC, the lobbying entity of Wall Street favor, literally was in charge of trade policy. The U.S. CoC wrote the language, the actual terms and conditions of U.S. government trade policy.
At the time when the U.S. CoC was tasked and permitted to do this, the Transpacific Partnership (TPP) trade deal was being written. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce was literally writing the language in the TPP and negotiating with the other nations involved. Put another way, the operational arm of the multinational Wall Street corporations was writing trade agreements. Can you see how the corporations were positioned?
On the Atlantic side, the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) was also coming next once TPP was finished. It was not the U.S. government negotiating these terms, it was Wall Street and the Multinational Corporate and Financial establishment, via the Chamber of Commerce, writing these deals. See the problem?
The leaders within BRICS could see the future of what this process would mean. Everything is about the economics. There are trillions at stake.
Additionally, the Word Economic Forum, the assembly of the multinational corporations in control of economics and trade, would now be dictating policy to NATO, the European Union, Central Banks, International Monetary Fund, World Bank and eventually the World Trade Organization (WTO).
BRICS could see that corporations would be in control of western government finance and trade, and as a consequence, when those same multinationals approached them for trade negotiations, the size of influence of the corporations would be, could be, too massive to fight. BRICS assembled in 2009 to unite, defend and combat this problem. This was their core mission, their commonality.
When President Trump was elected, for the first time since their assembly, BRICS saw a U.S. President with a completely different agenda. Donald Trump was not in favor of multinational corporations running and influencing government. Ideologically, as an economic nationalist, Trump was of the same mindset as the BRICS group. WATCH (1 minute):
When President Trump took office, he literally tore up the TPP trade agreement that Tom Donohue had established, he kicked the U.S. Chamber of Commerce out of government, and he established his own trade negotiating teams to put government back in charge of trade policy.
President Trump took us out of TPP, withdrew from the Paris Climate Treaty, dropped TTIP, triggered NAFTA renegotiations, initiated tariffs against our economic adversaries (multinationals) and told NATO to start preparing to take care of themselves. Trump was the first economic nationalist president in modern history.
Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and White House Trade and Economic Advisor Peter Navarro took over from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Trump established the economic and trade goals, the team worked the granular details, and ultimately Trump made the decisions, yes or no.
After Trump took this approach, the BRICS group essentially dissolved.
With the United States now confronting the WEF, NATO, the EU and all the multinationals (often called globalists), the BRICS team could pause their mission.
Factually, BRICS didn’t even meet during Trump’s term, because the U.S. trade and economic policy known as ‘America First‘, was essentially in alignment with the BRICS mission.
Unfortunately, it was the scale of the WEF, EU, NATO and multinational opposition to President Trump that eventually won. All the multinational corporations, including Big Tech and ideological globalists in media, aligned to remove President Trump. That was the scale of the opposition.
In the aftermath of the 2020 election, literally just days after the election, the BRICS group was back on the phone planning to start meetings again in 2021 on the sidelines of the G20 summit. The BRICS group are back together because the multinationals are back in control.
For obvious reasons, part of the BRICS agenda is to create a trade currency that is not the dollar. With the recent sanctions put into place against Russia, we can see why that was always going to be important.
In many very direct ways, what we are seeing in this Russia -vs- Ukraine crisis is a geopolitical battle between the outlook of BRICS (economic nationalists) and the NATO, EU, World Economic Forum, multinational corporate assembly, i.e. economic globalists.
At stake in the Ukraine battle is the modern structure of the global economy and international politics. This is why we see Joe Biden along with NATO, the EU and all of the affiliates under the control of the World Economic Forum going so hard against Russia.
EXAMPLE: India would not denounce Russia during the United Nations Security Council vote. Now Biden retaliates.
The Biden administration is looking whether to apply or waive sanctions on India for its purchase of the S-400 Triumf missile defense system from Russia, under Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA)
Lu’s remarks came as India drew criticism from US lawmakers, both Republicans and Democrats, at a hearing on the “US relationship with India” for being among 35 nations that abstained Wednesday from a UN vote to rebuke Russia’s invasion. (LINK)
We already know which side corporate media, Big Tech, Hollywood and the social media control officer’s support.
Will the multinational corporations win, or will Russia with the ideological support of China, India, South Africa and Brazil be victorious?
If the World Economic Forum beats Russia, that tells me all I need to know.
Posted originally on the conservative tree house on March 3, 2022 | Sundance
As World War Reddit continues in the sphere of social media, the modern version of Churchill is now Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Ignore all the money he has in offshore bank accounts, and please do not draw attention to his NATO/WEF puppet strings. Zelenskyy is Churchill.
Everything surrounding the propaganda push continues unabated. The public image of Volodymyr Zelenskyy is now maintained by Madison Avenue, Hollywood and Silicon Valley contracts. All the best people, you know, the ‘elites’, the cool kids, are flowing in one direction.
At this point, Big Tech social media groups have fulfilled the demands of the White House, State Dept, intelligence agencies, United Nations, EU, NATO, WEF, George Soros et al, and rallied the collective west to defeat Russia using the cultural weapon of social likeability.
Georgia and Moldova join the party today asking for EU membership. Rumors have it that New York, California and Mexico have also requested applications. With men rushing to the store for their blue/yellow skinny jeggings, the Hollywood telethon cannot be far behind.
REUTERS – Moldovan President Maia Sandu signed a formal application for her country to join the European Union on Thursday, charting a pro-Western course hastened by Russia’s invasion of neighbouring Ukraine.
Sandu’s move comes days after Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskiy signed a request for immediate EU membership as it battles invading Russian forces.
[…] Sandu, the prime minister and the parliamentary speaker all signed the document during a briefing in the capital Chisinau, where pro-Russian and pro-EU politicians have vied for control since Moldova won independence from the Soviet Union in 1991.
“It took 30 years for Moldova to reach maturity, but today the country is ready to take responsibility for its own future,” said Sandu, before holding up the signed document to the television cameras. (read more)
Kim Iversen from “The Hill” breaks down what’s true and what’s false about Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Using images of past wars to depict the current conflict is blatant propaganda. Iversen noted that she mistakenly promoted a picture of Zelensky in full military gear that was taken in April 2021, and honestly owned up to her mistake with an apology. The fake news has spread from the average social media user to the mainstream media, all of who seem to be supporting the same agenda. Even journalists are confused as to what is real.
Although Zelensky is receiving praise from the world for staying with the troops, he is far from a Julius Caesar leading his troops in battle with a red cloak on the frontlines. Everyone fails to mention that Zelensky’s policies pushed Russia from defensive to aggressive. Imagine if we were told Biden would remain in power for over eight years without receiving a proper vote on the matter?
Media outlets throughout the world are misreporting this war. The video above notes a German news channel accidentally aired an explosion leak that occurred years ago in China, claiming it was current footage from the ongoing war. We were shown images of Ukrainian troops dying on Snake Island, only to hear a follow-up that they are still alive. There are two sides to every story. Media channels worldwide are reporting this as a simple black and white, good v bad, situation. Yet, this war runs far deeper than public information will provide.
The World Health Organization (WHO) has signed a deal with T-Systems (a Deutsche Telecom subsidiary) for the production of a global QR system to produce an international vaccine passport. The company noted has already implemented vaccine QR codes for over 60 countries, despite the intense resistance by the people. T-Systems is also responsible for implementing the European Federation Gateway Service (EFGS), and Germany’s COVID warning app, which has been downloaded over 43 million times.
The WHO said further information is coming “soon,” but we already know the implications. This will provide governments with a tool to track and control our movements both domestically and internationally. Even if you have received the COVID shots and booster, you are only one vaccine away from becoming part of “the unvaccinated” population; you will be banished into the shadows of society. France recently repealed four million vaccine passports, halting lives instantaneously. Countries such as Israel and Australia are calling for four or five vaccines. If the people do not push back, the government will have us on a tight leash with full control over our lives.
THE WHO is using this Ukrainian Crisis to now justify “papers please” to use these passports to also “weed out” Russian spies. There might be a lot of people who would actually cheer if Putin invaded Geneva as a threat to the world economy. But why should he do that? This is the decline and fall of the West and all he has to do is cheer on Schwab and the WHO to achieve the end of Western Sovereignty.
At around the 1:50 mark in this video, Ukrainian Parliament member Kira Rudik may have secretly revealed part of the plan. “We not only fight for Ukraine we fight for this New World Order for the Democratic countries,” she admitted. How can the New World Order be a conspiracy when politicians are openly talking about the plan? Putin managed to end COVID within 48 hours after the world completely redirected their attention as the powers that be intended.
Klaus Schwab has announced “full solidarity” with Ukraine, despite previously claiming Putin was once one of his Young Global Leaders. Putin would have been above the age limit to become a Young Global Ambassador at the time Klaus stated, and this claim remains unconfirmed. What is confirmed is that Schwab is a fan of Lenin while Putin has rejected Lenin and Stalin. Putin is not a Young Global Leader as Schwab was claiming. Schwab nominated Putin as he did with Merkle but neither attended his 5-year indoctrination program into his Leninist philosophy.
Here is a picture of Schwab with a bust of Lenin sitting on his shelf as an ode to communism. Yet, they are fighting for “Democratic countries” under Schwab’s plan of a New World Order? Something does not add up.
The government urged parents to expose their children to an experimental drug with unknown consequences to prevent a virus that has a statistically insignificant death rate for children (and adults). The New York State Department of Health announced that a new study found Pfizer’s vaccination was only 12% effective for children aged 5 to 11.
Pfizer was distributing the same dosage for undeveloped 12-year-olds as it was to fully grown adults at 30 micrograms. Children under 11 only received 10 micrograms of the mRNA vaccine. Pfizer and BioNTech was forced to push back their study on children under the age of 5 after they were forced to admit the vaccine has been ineffective.
The New York State Department of Health chose to release their allegedly new findings the same day that children were finally permitted to attend school without a mask. The fear here is that the powers that be could give us, and our children, a glimpse of freedom only to take it back. “Given rapid loss of protection against infections, these results highlight the continued importance of layered protections, including mask wearing, for children to prevent infection and transmission,” the public health officials wrote in the study.
The FDA is planning a clinical trial on a third booster shot for children. They will market this to the sheep by saying that the first two doses were ineffective, so their child’s life depends on yet another dose. Did you enjoy playing at recess without a mask? Good, now take another higher dosage of a protein-altering medication that is more likely to kill you than the virus itself. The World Health Organization has even admitted that healthy children do not need boosters.
Pfizer, BioNTech, Moderna, the FDA, and anyone peddling these vaccines to children should face class-action lawsuits and serious penalties. This is domestic biowarfare that is targeting the most vulnerable among our population.
Posted originally on the conservative tree house on March 2, 2022 | sundance
This DeceptiCon, this specific one, owned by the multinational corporate conglomerates, is one of the worst in office.
Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski tells Politico tonight that she is in favor of higher gas prices for Americans if that’s what it takes to punish Vladimir Putin.
…”We’re going to see price increases. Nobody wants to see that. This is going to hurt. But we need to recognize Europe is in the midst of a war w/ Russia. Innocent people are dying. We have not been in as volatile as a situation as anytime in my life.“…
Here we go with the narrative of you being unpatriotic if you are not willing to financially suffer the pain inflicted intentionally by the U.S. government. Not willing to pay $7/gal for gasoline? You’re selfish. Not willing to forego a better life for your family, in order to save Ukraine? You are a horrible person.
However, this narrative is even worse, because the NATO (aligned with World Economic Forum) economic warfare is not only a combination of ideology and corporate influence, but it is also made worse by U.S. government energy policy – which is aligned with the multinational corporations demanding the confrontation. Effen’ FUBAR all the way around.
(Via Politico) – Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski on Wednesday called for the U.S. to stop imports of Russia oil to punish Moscow for the assault against Ukraine — even if it drives domestic energy prices higher.
Targeting Russian energy is the “most significant” tool left for the U.S. to deploy, the Alaska senator said in an interview, and given President Vladimir Putin’s dependence on oil and gas revenues, it’s “the one that can do the most immediate damage to Russia in halting their efforts.”
“We are going to see price increases,” Murkowski said. “Nobody wants to see that. And this is going to hurt. But we all need to recognize Europe is in the midst of a war with Russia now. Innocent people are dying, children are dying. We have not been in as volatile as a situation as anytime in my life. And so we are looking right now from a very short window.” (read more)
This type of stuff just blows my blood pressure cuff.
Posted originally on the conservative tree house on March 2, 2022 | sundance
Kamala and Pete have been in a contest to see who can use the most words without actually saying anything. Previously, Pete set the record during his presidential bid of 2020. However, in 2021 Kamala got serious about the contest. Harris fired her communications team and brought in new brand image consultants to help her finally achieve that first-place status which was so elusive.
Appearing on NBC’s “Today” show with Savannah Guthrie, the additional training paid off. Kamala Harris was asked about the U.S. economic impact of sanctions on Russia and whether stopping purchases of Russian oil was possible. This was the opening Harris had been looking for to highlight her sharpened linguistics.
Using the communication team notes for reference (watch her eyes), for almost a minute Kamala Harris assembled 247 various words in a random sequence. The result is remarkable. WATCH: (prompted):
QUESTION: You think Putin should win? Why do you support Putin?
SB
ANSWER: Do you really think that Putin should be defeated? What planet are you on? If Putin is defeated in Ukraine, then the entire fate of Russia hangs in the balance. Do you honestly think he would let the collapse of Russia take place? At that point, any animal will attack if its back is against the wall. If Ukraine were to win, the ONLY option for Putin will be to push the red button. Are you drinking the government’s Kool-Aid?
We better pray for a diplomatic solution and the world has to stop cheering Zelensky. He has tried to engulf the entire world. He has been asking for jets from everyone. They are wisely standing aside for if any NATO country sends in troops or jets to Ukraine, it is an all-out war.
Be very careful who you are cheering for. This is not a soccer match or a video game. Zelensky gets billions from all the Russian gas that flows to Europe through Ukraine. He is fighting for revenue. He cut off all the water supply to Crimea while he has been shelling the Donbas. None of this is being reported by the mainstream press. Crimea sits on top of vast gas fields which he wants desperately to compete with Russia.
My fear is that Zelensky has not done the obvious solution to yield the Donbas. If Putin then continued then it is really to regain control of Ukraine because it is critical to Russian gas supplies to Europe. I do not know why Zelensky has thought he could defeat Russia alone. It just makes no sense. Now all of Ukraine is at risk. All we can do is hope for a diplomatic resolution.
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America
Centinel2012 