Why I Do Not Trust Safety Deposit Boxes


Posted originally on Oct 7, 2024 By Martin Armstrong

safety deposit boxes

I have said numerous times that your personal belongings are at risk in safety deposit boxes. The Fourth Amendment was intended to protect Americans from illegal search and seizures, but as we have seen in recent years, the government does not respect the Constitution or our freedoms. Governments will become increasingly tyrannical as we move into 2032, and every government believes that their citizens are to blame for large deficits. If only we paid our fair share then our politicians could fund their endless spending.

The government makes the rules. The Constitution has become a rough guideline that they simply do not follow. There are countless examples of the US government raiding safety deposit boxes under the pretense of restoring law and order. In March 2021, the FBI held a full-scale raid on US Private Vaults, a storage facility located in Beverly Hills, California. The government claimed that they needed to raid safety deposit boxes and confiscate the contents since they were purchased through illegal money laundering.

FBI DOJ

Up to 1,400 safety deposit boxes were seized, containing $86 million in cash, not including gold, jewelry, coins, and other valuables. The government said that they planned to keep all stolen items until a group of victims filed a class-action lawsuit. US District Judge R. Gary Klausner initially deemed that the FBI was within the scope of the warrant when it confiscated belongings from citizens who had absolutely no ties to criminal activity. A three-judge appeals panel later found that the FBI abused its authority as the warrant only permitted the department to open boxes of individuals under investigation. It took many years for the victims to receive a portion of their belongings, but not everyone was made whole.

This is a worldwide issue and is not limited to the United States. In 2016, for example, UK-based HSBC came after safe deposit boxes in Hong Kong to assist the government in looking for cash from citizens. In 2015, when Greece was suffering from its decision to join the European Union, Deputy Minister of Finance, Olga Valavani, announced that safe deposit boxes were restricted. There are COUNTLESS examples of governments throughout the world confiscating assets and banks are forced to comply.

FBI Raid Boxes

The grey area that is allowing this seizure of assets is multidimensional. First there is the assumption it is the illegal proceeds from drugs. Second, there is the presumption it is money laundering and that is very broad for it can be drug money to hiding money from the government to avoid taxes, which they also call money laundering. Third, there is the ambiguous Internal Revenue Service regulation that basically states. “Consumers should never conceal cash from the United States government and not pay income tax on it.”  They could argue that cash in a safety deposit box is hidden from the government. They can also now argue that this is money laundering and that cash should be confiscated. It becomes your burden to prove them wrong.

We heard what happened when FDR signed Executive Order 6102 in April 1933, prohibiting US citizens from owning gold. Penalties for disobeying were up to $10,000 and/or 10 years imprisonment. That was mostly fixed through voluntary transfer as the population was regaining confidence in government. What happens when the government moves digital and wants cash off the grid? There are NO guarantees. The government has the ability to accuse anyone of committing a crime and use that as a means to seize assets. We have seen it happen time and time again with debanking practices.

So no, I do not recommend keeping everything in a safe deposit box. There is no precise law against storing metal or cash in a safe deposit box, but the law is malleable in the hands of any judge. A judge can seize the money or gold under the pretense of money laundering or use the same facility as someone accused of the offense.

Whistleblower Imprisoned for Investigating Election Fraud


Posted originally on Oct 7, 2024 By Martin Armstrong

Former Colorado country clerk Tina Peters has been sentenced to 9 years imprisonment for conducting an independent investigation regarding election fraud. Prosecutors said Peters was “fixated” on voter fraud after the 2020 US Presidential Election and took it upon herself to investigate the matter. “I’ve never done anything with malice to break the law. I’ve only wanted to serve the people of Mesa County,” she told the court.

Did Peters break the law or is she an innocent whistleblower? “In a real and specific way, her actions have led directly to death threats and general threats to the lives and the families of the people who work in our elections,” Colorado County Clerks Association director Matt Crane said. “She has willingly aided individuals in our country who believe that violence is a way to make a point. She has knowingly fueled a fire within others who choose threats as a means to get their way.”

Peters, 69, claims she was directed by Secretary of State Jenna Griswold to destroy voter data after the election while working as a county clerk. She asked a coworker to help her build a case and shared voter data in the process by making a copy of the files she was ordered to delete. The judge has claimed that Peters perpetuated the dangerous lie of the election being stolen. Those in her office claim she put their lives at risk by claiming they helped Joe Biden and Kamala Harris illegally win the election.

Tina Peters is a Gold Star mom whose Navy Seal son died while fighting for his country. She has no prior criminal record and is certainly not a flight risk. She will be 78 years old when she is released from prison. The Colorado legal system found her guilty of three counts of attempting to influence a public servant, one count of conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation, first-degree official misconduct, violation of duty, and failing to comply with the secretary of state. But were her findings valid?

“Colorado’s elections are the nation’s gold standard. I am proud of how we have responded to the first insider elections breach in the nation and look forward to another secure and successful election in November,” Griswold said after Judge Barrett told her she is “no hero” and a “charlatan.”

I believe Tina Peters is a political prisoner. Peters preserved evidence of an actual crime from Dominion voting systems before the evidence could be completely destroyed. The judge has a history of voting to ActBlue and ruled based on personal opinion rather than the law. Her victimless “crime” came with a sentence that surpasses what rapists or child molesters receive. Why would they be so harsh to sentence a woman who copied documents if there was nothing to hide?

Trump will certainly provide her a pardon if elected. Under a Kamala presidency, we should expect to see an increase in political prisoners like Tina Peters. Anyone found guilty of exposing the TRUTH is a threat to the establishment that they will promptly extinguish.

Why the EU Wants War


Posted originally on Oct 7, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

EU Parliament Building

The European leaders are pushing for war with Russia because, economically, they are failing. Those in the highest offices of the European Union faced the decline and fall of their dream – one European government that had been attempted many times before, from Charlemagne to Hitler and Napoleon. As I have written before, they came to me when they were creating this project since we were the currency specialists. They attended, taking the entire back row of our London World Economic Conference.

I warned them back then that the euro would NEVER displace the dollar unless they consolidated the national debts of Europe. I was told that was impossible and they just had to get the euro through and then worry about the debts later. I explained that capital would merely trade one member’s bond against another, the same as in currencies. That was in 1998, and they never addressed the debt issue that is now escalating into a crisis.

1 Kohl Dictator

It was Chancellor Kohl who blocked the debt consolidation. He admitted he acted as a dictator and took Germany into the euro, denying the German people any right to vote because he knew he would have lost the vote seven to three. Because of that decision, the euro could never replace the dollar, and an institutional investor still had to compare one member state against another. The volatility once in the foreign exchange markets was merely transferred to the individual bond markets.

The theory behind creating the EU Parliament was that one government would end European wars. Now, the EU is looking for a war to pretend the economic demise of Europe was not because of their gross mismanagement and the failure to design the euro properly. Also, never in history has centralized control succeeded. In fact, this idea of a one-size-fits-all approach has always ended in civil war, for it is tearing the United States apart at the seams as well, just as it did with Communism in Russia and China.

This idea of the EU and a centralized dictatorial government is rapidly becoming ungovernable. Even at a recent debate in Berlin, a German voter criticized Chancellor Olaf Scholz, pointing out that Germany’s government is unable to govern as its ministers are bickering like children fighting over the same toy. The shocking response from Scholz conceded the point. “The truth is: You are right, but what would be your solution? I mean, I’m asking for a friend.”

EU_Takes_Hungary_to_Top_Court_Over_Orban_s_Sovereignty_Law_Bloomberg

The EU is trying to create dictatorial power from Brussels and is taking Hungary to court over what it views as its controversial sovereignty-protection legislation. The EU demands that Hungary do as it commands. This tension always emerges and leads to civil wars and separatist movements. We will see the breakup of the EU because this centralized control always fails.

Croatia and Hungary oppose NATO’s rush to war, which has no viable purpose without creating war. The Eastern Blocks are resisting war, for they know Ukraine very well and are not trustworthy in the least. Ukrainians see themselves as superior and engage in ethnic cleansing of not just Russians but Jews and Polish as well. They were so brutal that even the German Nazis were horrified. Ukrainians cut the babies out of pregnant women and sowed in a live cat.

The Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico has also spoken out against Ukraine’s membership in NATO. He reminded that membership must be ratified by all members. No more slick side deals. Indeed, nobody can join NATO if they are at war, for that would invoke Article 6 and direct all to join the fight. Ukraine’s close neighbors do not trust Ukraine. They were the collaborators of Hitler and practiced ethnic cleansing. He said:

“As long as I am the prime minister of the Slovak Republic, I will lead the deputies over whom I have political control as the head of the party to never agree to Ukraine’s membership in NATO.”

The EU is crumbling from within, and as that happens, it is becoming highly authoritarian. Turkey is pretending to be in accord with NATO yet doing a balancing act between Russia and NATO. Will they actually send troops to invade Russia when NATO gives the green light for World War III? That remains to be seen because it will cost Turkey its dream of resurrecting the Ottoman Empire. The rest of the Arab world will turn against Turkey.

The EU has been in the grips of a deepening crisis that began with climate change and unleashed a cost-of-living crisis, a housing crisis, a migration crisis, and a collapsing economic growth. This has been accelerated by the decline since the turn in the ECM in May 2024. This has furthered a political crisis, and the right has faced a significant challenge. The Freedom Party won the Austrian elections with 30% of the vote. This combined threatens the fragile EU cohesion that has promoted the WOKE agenda.

The EU is using the excuse of Hungary’s veto to supply Ukraine with money to destroy Russia to steal 50 billion of frozen Russian assets to fund themselves. Only 5% of that money will go to Ukraine to circumvent Hungary’s veto. The EU is desperate for money, and they view their conquest of Russia as a way to refill the treasury.

On the international front, the EU continues to face the escalation of war against Russia, using Ukraine as the vanguard. Zelensky’s invasion of Russia directly has been orchestrated in hopes of forcing Russia to attack anything they can justify World War III. NATO is scheming to gather $100 billion to keep up the conquest of Russia. Our models warn that WWIII will unfold by 2025, and the destruction of NATO is in the cards by 2027.

Russia the War Criminal
Zelensky Meloni
Zelensky Stamer

Please make no mistake about it. Zelensky’s “Victory Plan” is all about the destruction of Russia. He presents Russia as a War Criminal, and NATO is in favor of letting him use long-range missiles to attack even the Kremlin. NATO wants Russia to respond and attack anything in NATO so they can invoke Article 5 and turn this into World War III. Let’s get real. All of these leaders cheering on war couldn’t win a bar fight but cheer others dying for their ambitions.

I will no longer revisit Europe. I saw the Colosseum for the last time. It will not be standing in the years ahead. Like the fall of Rome and the subsequent Dark Age (5th–10th centuries), Europe’s knowledge and history will be lost again. Next year, 2025, will start the 6th wave of 309.6 years from the fall of Rome in 476AD.

Zelensky has now publicly declared this is really World War III, stating that to guarantee Ukraine lasting peace and security, there will be no trade of sovereignty or territories. He has effectively said that all the ethnic Russians in Ukraine are no longer allowed to retain their natural language or their religion. This is a total war against Russia with no compromise of peace absent the destruction of Russia or Europe, whichever comes first.

What is a Woman – The Court to Decide that Question in November


Posted originally on Oct 6, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

UK Supreme Court Lord Reed

Well, the UK high court is going to decide what a woman is in the midst of the pending doom of Western Society. This seemingly obvious question, what is a woman is to be addressed. This decision will come down in November by the highest court in the land. Five senior judges, three men and two women, will be led by Lord Reed who is the president of the court and the UK’s most senior judge. This decision should be interesting. What if World War III kills all biological women, and all we have left are transgenders? Could that mark the end of humanity?

woman_back_and_forth_questions_300_clr_12477

Blinken pushing for Long-Range Missiles for Ukraine to Destroy Russia


Posted originally on Oct 6, 2024 By Martin Armstrong |  

Blinken is pushing for Long-range missiles to destroy the military capacity of Russia. They still see NATO as invading Russia just as soon as they can claim that Russia is the aggressor by attacking something in NATO. I have warned that they would do their best to create World War III before the election. These Neocons could not win a bar fight but love death and destruction on TV as if this is some video game. These people have NEVER won a single war yet post-WWII, but they are so close to destroying Russia that they are not about to let Trump & RFK take that dream away.

Russian_Ruble_Futures W Array 10 6 24

We see the next two weeks as absolutely critical. Putin must take this seriously as a war with NATO, and Ukraine is their proxy, just as Hezbollah is the proxy of Iran. If he does not respond to Zelensky with a major show of force to crush Ukraine, then NATO will only use them as their vanguard and will end up in a direct war not much different than what we see with Iran vs. Israel.

US vs Russian Ukraine Proxy

President Biden has been considering allowing Ukraine to use U.S.-provided long-range missiles to strike deeper into Russia. This decision would most certainly mark a potential shift in American involvement and send a signal to Russia that this is really a war between the USA and NATO vs. Russia. Ukrainian leaders argue they need these weapons to defend against Russian attacks. The US and NATO are no different than Iran using Hezbolla against Israel.

The Terrorist Neocon Organization – NATO – Planning to Circumvent Trump/RFK


Posted originally on Oct 6, 2024 By Martin Armstrong

Stoltenberg NATO

Our sources have been whispering for weeks now that NATO is scheming to secure $100 billion to destroy Russia, ensuring that if Trump is elected, he cannot cut off the funding for the Ukraine War. The American Neocons are ruthless, and they are conspiring in Europe and with Biden to safeguard against the possibility of Donald Trump cutting off all assistance to Ukraine if he emerges victorious in the November 2024 presidential election.

Einstein on War

This conspiracy, hatched among the NEOCONS, proposes to create a fund entrusting to NATO, an unelected NEOCON sanctuary, overseeing this $100 billion fund to provide support to keep World War III going. NATO will allow Ukraine to use long-range missiles. The objective is the destruction of Russia.

NATO North Atlantic Terror Organization

The NEOCON Sanctuary

The U.S. has sent $24.4 billion to Ukraine so far. Seeking $100 billion confirms what I have been warning about. NATO has been scheming for Ukraine to invade Russia to start World War III and to weaken Russia using long-range missiles to destroy their ability to defend their country. Then NATO will create a false flag, like the Weapons of Mass Destruction, to conquer Russia. Our computer warns Europe will be destroyed and NATO will lose. It is absurd to claim they can create peace by war. They are deranged people worse than any serial killer.

Sun Su Art of War Know Your Enemy

From the 1955 joining of Germany into NATO, we are looking at the destruction of NATO in 72 years, bringing us to 2027

The Neocons have lost EVERY war since WWII – They are incapable of winning even one!

Armstrong on Peace
NATO ECM 2

Sunday Talks: Senator Tom Cotton vs NBC Host Kristen Welker


Posted originally on the CTH October 6, 2024 | Sundance

There is a certain level of media bias that exceeds even what is sickeningly visible amid expected media bias. That level of bias should be called Welker-level.

Seriously, in this Meet the Press segment Ms. Welker takes antagonistic questioning to new levels of insufferable falsehood. Tom Cotton swats away the effort, but good grief she doesn’t stop trying. WATCH:

.

President Trump MAGA Rally – Juneau, Wisconsin – 3:00pm ET Livestream


n

Posted originally on the CTH October 6, 2024 | Sundance 

Today, President Trump heads to Juneau, Wisconsin, for another battleground state rally.  The anticipated start time for this rally is 3:00pm ET with livestream links below.

RSBN YouTube Livestream – RSBN Rumble Livestream – Trump Campaign Rumble Livestream

Excerpts From President Trump’s Historic Return to Butler Pennsylvania


Posted originally on the CTH October 6, 2024 | Sundance 

A few not-to-be-missed segments from President Trump’s historic rally in Butler, Pennsylvania last night.

The Paramedic who treated President Trump after he was shot in a failed assassination attempt, was Sally Sheri. Mrs. Sheri gave a remarkable speech outlining what she experienced while treating President Trump.

.

Elon Musk flew to Butler, Pennsylvania to give his support to President Trump and deliver remarks.

.

JD Vance delivered remarks.

.

 

Hillary Clinton Wants Increased Censorship and Control Over U.S. Social Media Platforms


Posted originally on the CTH October 6, 2024 | Sundance

First, we need background context.

The latter part of 2010 through 2011 was a key period in the Obama presidency.  On the cusp of a midterm election shellacking, with domestic focus on the issues around Obamacare, the Obama team and Hillary Clinton team were also intent on fueling the “Arab Spring” and the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood in Libya and Egypt.

With background research provided by the U.S. State Dept and Rivkin Project in France, a petri-dish dish experiment to see if French culture could be diluted and enhanced with “brotherhood-style” multiculturalism, Hillary and Barry then fine-tuned the mechanics.  Secretary Hillary Clinton, Samantha Power and Susan Rice quickly convinced President Obama to help leverage his Silicon Valley allies.

As a workaround to stop Hosni Mubarak and Muamar Kaddafi from controlling information flow and putting down the protests, the social media platforms of Twitter and Facebook were enlisted to assist the Brotherhood in Egypt and Libya respectively.  The U.S-designated Brotherhood partners were given support, communication and influence through Twitter and Facebook to organize their protests.

In 2011 the official merge of U.S. social media platforms to assist the U.S. State Dept foreign policy agenda was created.  In many ways this merge was the inflection point for government to begin controlling social media, Libya and Egypt were the BETA test for what would later be deployed domestically.

Seeing the success and influence of the Arab Spring experiment, in 2012 President Obama signed HR-5736, with an addition to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013.  The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act, contained within the NDAA for Fiscal Year 2013, eased some restrictions so that media produced by the U.S. Agency for Global Media and intended for foreign audiences could be distributed domestically upon request, according to its text. Prior to its passage, the propaganda content was banned from being disseminated in America.

This move made it possible to deploy the same social media tactics domestically.  Within the Twitter Files, you will note how 2012 and 2013 are key periods when the Dept of Homeland Security began exploring their new influence partnership in social media.   For the next ten years, that partnership created various sub-set silos within the government.

DHS, FBI and Intelligence Community offices now had direct communication lines into Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Google, WhatsAp, etc.  However, Telegram and TikTok were not around and not part of the partnership.  What two platforms have been targeted recently?… Just a coincidence, I’m sure.

The Arab Spring was the BETA test, the proving ground.  Then they went domestic with the same operation.

The results of the domestic operation, the public-private partnership, later became stunningly visible in the COVID-19 censorship operation as well as the government influence operation in the aftermath of the 2020 election.  However, most recently there has been some pushback from both originating entities; Twitter – via Elon Musk, and Facebook – via a regretful Mark Zuckerberg.

Remember, Hillary Clinton was the Secretary of State when this entire system was originating.

This is the fullest context to absorb the video soundbite below.  Hillary Clinton is upset that control over social media platforms is slipping away. Hillary Clinton now saying, ‘we lose total control’ if we don’t ‘Moderate & Monitor’ social media more. WATCH:

.

Hillary Clinton is frustrated because from her perspective so much progress had been made.

Now, suddenly, with increased scrutiny and a more awakened public seeing the consequences, it is harder for the government to execute their domestic propaganda operations.  Even the labeling and categorization through “mis-dis-mal-information” does not appear to be working.

Within the recent WEF discussion, Secretary Kerry outlines how freedom of speech is a ‘threat to the global democracy‘ because the governing officials have a difficult time controlling information.  Kerry goes on to posit how the next administration, presumably in his hope Kamala Harris, will forcefully structure all the tools of government to stop Americans from using the first amendment to freely speak about issues.

Governing is too challenging, according to Kerry, when the government cannot stop people from seeking and discovering information that is against their interests.  Effective governing required compliant adherence to a singular ideology.  Against the backdrop of COVID-19 and a host of similarly related government narratives, if people are free to find alternative information and think for themselves, they become increasingly more difficult to control.  Yes, this is said quite openly.  This is the mindset of those in power.  WATCH: 

.

On a positive note, millions of people now accurately understand why it is so important to refute the terms “mis-dis-mal information.”  When CTH initially warned about the labeling, most people did not understand; however, as the consequences begin to surface, I would argue almost a majority of people now understand.

…”There is no such thing as “disinformation” or “misinformation”.  There is only information you accept and information you do not accept.  You were not born with a requirement to believe everything you are told; rather, you were born with a brain that allows you to process the information you receive and make independent decisions.”… 

The absence of control creates fear.