Posted originally on Mar 17, 2025 by Martin Armstrong
QUESTION: NASA believes that this next solar maximum will be less than the last. Do you agree with that, or should I ask Socrates to agree with that? My second question is the coming asteroid. They say it will hit the earth in 2032. Is that part of Socrates’ forecast?
Fred
ANSWER: Well, as for the asteroid hitting the Earth in 2032, they are playing it down really hard, like it has less than 3%. However, they are already looking at ways to try to destroy it because the odds are much higher than they are telling you. All I can say is that the 8.6-year cycle functions on a fractal basis, and it is extremely accurate. The precession of the equinox is nearly 25,800 years in duration, and that is 3 x 8.6. The fact that this is arriving in 2032 may simply be destiny and part of the universe’s timing.
Now, as to the next solar cycle, we show it should arrive here in 2025, but our computer disagrees with NASA, and it should be stronger than the last. This is the trend into 2032 for solar energy to intensify, meaning more significant flares and possible disruption to power grids, etc. This will be part of the trend into 2032 that will also impact the commodity markets.
The attached report on Global Weather for January 2024 Data has charts showing the relationship between CO2 growth and Temperature increases going up since we started to accurately measure CO2 in the atmosphere in 1958. These Charts were created by showing CO2 as a percent increase from when it was first measured in 1958, the Black plot, the scale is on the left and it shows CO2 going up by about ~34.0% from 1958 to January 2024. That is a very large change as anyone would have to agree.
Now how about temperature, well when we look at the percentage change in temperature also from 1958, using Kelvin (which does measure the actual change in heat), we find that the changes in global temperature (heat) is about ~.3% and may reach .5% by 2028. To even be able to see this minuscule change we had to reduce the scale of the Temperature Axis by a factor of ten.
This Chart 8 uses unaltered values from NOAA and NASA properly displayed ,and the Blue and Yellow projections are created by Microsoft Excel not me.
The NOAA and NASA numbers tell us the story of the Very Small Changes in the temperature of the planets Atmosphere As Carbon Dioxide goes up geometrically.
Posted originally on Feb 26, 2025 by Martin Armstrong
Imagine handing a $2 billion grant to an organization that produced $100 in revenue. This is precisely what happened under Joe Biden’s watch when the EPA approved a $2 billion payout to yet another climate-related non-profit that acted as a political slush fund for the liberal elite. There is NO possible way to defend this blatant corruption.
Power Forward Communities is a non-profit climate activism organization linked to Biden chorine Stacey Abrahms. I will never refrain from repeating that the INFLATION REDUCTION ACT WAS A CLIMATE CHANGE SLUSH FUND. Joe Biden admitted the entire premise of America’s largest spending package was all designed under the guise of climate change. The people were completely deceived into believing the act would address inflation. The new administration is continuing to peel back the layers of where the funds from that $2.7 trillion package actually went.
Once more, the Inflation Reduction Act went beyond Biden and the US. Former Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen admitted the truth behind the Inflation Reduction Act as well: “The Inflation Reduction Act is, at its core, about turning the climate crisis into an economic opportunity,” Yellen clearly stated. It provided the government with an opportunity to eliminate our energy independence. We did not have an energy crisis before Joe Biden took office. His campaign was built around the globalist BUILD BACK BETTER agenda to sacrifice one’s nation to usher in the Great Reset. The World Economic Forum put it in writing that knocking down America was part of the plan, and people still voted for Biden. Then everyone acted surprised when he plummeted our nation’s economy as if that wasn’t his platform from the beginning.
Over $360 billion from the Inflation Reduction Act was set aside specifically for climate change initiatives. Where are those funds now? So far, it seems the money spent was funneled through various agencies linked directly to the Democrats. Grants were not awarded based on merit but recklessly handed out to whoever had their hand out. The majority of these so-called non-profits have done very little with the money they were awarded, as transparency was intentionally avoided.
The Environmental Protection Agency’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, created through the Inflation Reduction Act, deemed it necessary to pay Power Forward $2 billion. Now, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin revealed that his agency awarded eight different climate agencies a total of $20 billion under Biden. Project Veritas filmed a former EPA employee explaining how they were directed to spend as much as possible before Trump took office, comparing their actions to throwing gold bars off the Titanic.
Stacey Abrams serves as senior counsel at Rewiring America, one of the founding groups of Power Forward Communities. This woman has a track record of financial mismanagement. Abrahms was $200,000 in debt back in 2018 before her net worth grew to $3.17 million by 2022. Abrahms admitted that she accumulated hundreds of thousands in debt due to student loans, credit card debt, and back taxes because rules for thee but not me. Still, they insisted she could manage the budget of the state of Georgia during her failed bid for governor. Her refusal to concede made her an activist figure for the left, and she profited off her political celebrity status. But did she EARN her millions?
Power Forward has done nothing thus far but suddenly wants to spend $539 million in the coming weeks on energy-efficient housing. Zeldin would like that money back. The taxpayers should demand that the money be returned. Imagine if Donald Trump awarded $2 billion to an organization that earned less than a child’s lemonade stand and had connections to a conservative ally? The absolute corruption of the past administration is unbelievable as they robbed the public blind for climate, migrants, war, and personal gain.
Posted originally on Feb 19, 2025 by Martin Armstrong
Justin Trudeau continually touts that Canada is on track to achieve net zero emissions by 2050. Of course, all of the politicians claiming that they can meet this target will not be in politics long enough to execute the plan. In fact, numerous studies have found that it will be impossible to meet net zero by 2050, no matter how much governments spend on climate change.
The Fraser Institute found that Canadian workers will be paying C$8,000 annually by 2050 to meet these impossible targets. The institute believes that as a result of the climate agenda, real GDP will decline by 7%, and income will decline by 6% per worker, resulting in 250,000 fewer jobs. Simulating the Emission Reduction Plan (ERP) into 2050 would, at best, lead to a 70% reduction in CO2 emissions.
The study then began looking at the carbon tax. Forcing companies to pay C$400 per tonne could decrease emissions by 68%, but tripling that figure to C$1,200 would only result in an additional 6% decline. These measures could cause GDP to fall a massive 18%, with incomes declining by 17%.
Kenneth Green in “Rapid Decarbonization of Electricity and Future Supply Constraints” noted that Canada simply does not have the infrastructure to support these lower carbon goals. “Canada would need to rapidly build infrastructure on a scale never before seen in the country’s history,” Green stated. He estimates that the nation would need an additional 684 TWh of electricity by 2050 to meet demand. Green believes Canada would need around 16 new nuclear power plant facilities, which he estimates would take 112 years to complete.
Wind power is not a reliable alternative. Canada would need to build 575 new wind-power installations, which would take an estimated 1,150 years to complete and 1 million hectares of land. Solar is not an option. Canada would need 840 solar generating stations and 1,680 years to complete by 2050. Green did not factor in the regulations and legalities in approving such projects.
Some have deemed the Paris Accord and other nations heightened pledges “emissions impossible.” There is no feasible way for nations to simply eliminate carbon emissions. Yet, that will not prevent governments from extorting the people for a scheme that is doomed to fail.
The attached report on Global Weather for December 2024 Data has charts showing the relationship between CO2 growth and Temperature increases going up since we started to accurately measure CO2 in the atmosphere in 1958. These Charts were created by showing CO2 as a percent increase from when it was first measured in 1958, the Black plot, the scale is on the left and it shows CO2 going up by about ~34.0% from 1958 to December 2024. That is a very large change as anyone would have to agree.
Now how about temperature, well when we look at the percentage change in temperature also from 1958, using Kelvin (which does measure the actual change in heat), we find that the changes in global temperature (heat) is about ~.3% and may reach .5% by 2028. To even be able to see this minuscule change we had to reduce the scale of the Temperature Axis by a factor of ten.
This Chart 8 uses unaltered values from NOAA and NASA properly displayed ,and the Blue and Yellow projections are created by Microsoft Excel not me.
The NOAA and NASA numbers tell us the story of the Very Small Changes in the temperature of the planets Atmosphere As Carbon Dioxide goes up geometrically.
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America
Centinel2012 