Chicks Be Like . . . (a post for guys only)

Can’t be said any better, thanks.


From James Perloff

chicks-be-likeMost of the posts I’ve written lately have been quite serious, as is the major one I’m working on now. In the meantime, I’ve decided to post something strictly for fun, because laughter is good for the body and (usually) for the soul. Sorry, ladies, this post’s not for you (except the ending). It’s a guys’-only view of the “battle of the sexes,” one of the few battles that crosses political, cultural and ethnic lines. In fact, I think it’s healthy to reaffirm that battle in this insane age of transgenderism and transhumanism. My thanks to all the memers, cartoonists and other creative people who provided this post’s content—some of whom are unidentifiable. If anyone sees content they created, and wishes it removed or an acknowledgement added, let me know.

In the old days, you could make sexist jokes about women. It hadn’t yet become politically incorrect.

View original post 414 more words


Great come back … lol


February 10, 2017 12:33 PM

Whispering in the library


A man was looking for a place to sit in a crowded university library.


He asked a girl: “Do you mind if I sit beside you?”
The girl replied, in a loud voice “NO, I DON’T WANT TO SPEND THE NIGHT WITH
All the people in the library started staring at the man, who was deeply
embarrassed and moved to another table.

After a couple of minutes, the girl walked quietly to the man’s table and
said with a laugh: “I study psychology, and I know what a man is thinking;
I bet you felt embarrassed, right?
“The man responded in a loud voice: “$500 FOR ONE NIGHT? ….. I`M NOT

All the people in the library looked at the girl in shock.
The man whispered to her: “I study law, and I know how…

View original post 4 more words

California Dreaming

California dreaming


    Thanks for all you do. As you have been teaching, do the math. What would be the financial implications of CALIEXIT be? In other words , how much would the rest of the country save if we voted California off the island?  You have already enlightened us to the fact that they asked behind the curtain to overtake the 401ks of the rest of the country last year with 3 other states to support their failed state pension system.
     Looking back at the previous paragraph, I just laughed out loud. The computer predicted the breakup of the US and I’m currently considering the effects on my wallet !
REPLY: Yes. California is a complete black hole. The people do not even realize that government has been so corrupt, that every person in California owe $93,000 at the end of 2016 to cover state employee pensions. Back in 2015, Calpers, the State Pension system, sold out stocks and bought bonds because they thought the stock market would crash. They have been quietly supporting efforts in Congress to seize 401K pension plans and hand them to the States to manage. Their top two corrupt politicians would have had this through if Hillary won.
It would be a win-win for the rest of the country if California seceded and took its two leading politicians with them. Of course, I doubt these two notorious politicians would vote to leave. It would be like the Clinton Foundation having to close shop because Hillary lost her influence to peddle.
Nancy Pelosi is the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives, representing California’s 12th congressional district. Pelosi made a fortune trading initial public offerings (IPOs) while she had access to insider information from Congress. Yet she would never allow Social Security to invest for the average person. Pelosi has confirmed how Democrats really do dislike Christians. She recently said: “They pray in church on Sunday and then prey on people the rest of the week.”  The Podesta emails that revealed the Democrats disliked Catholics and Evangelical Christians, seem to be on point about their attitude: Hillary’s staff said Catholics are “severely backwards” and further demeaned them saying they don’t know “what the hell they’re talking about.”
Then there is Dianne Feinstein. Of course it was Feinstein who supported the NSA and called Snowden a Traitor. Her Op-Ed justified taking everyone’s emails, phone calls etc claiming 911 would not have taken place if the NSA had full power to do whatever it desired – and did. Our models were showing California would move to secede back then and they too see to be on target. Even Zuckerberg of Facebook said he had personally called President Obama to voice his outrage at the NSA spying and Feinstein’s insane support of activity that everyone has come to see as standard. He said on his own Facebook Page:“When our engineers work tirelessly to improve security, we imagine we’re protecting you against criminals, not our own government.” 

Then Feinstein’s husband won the contract to sell Post Office Department real estate. Of course they cover that up claiming Blum Capital Partners, L.P (Richard Blum, Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s husband), won the bid against 7 other competitors. They have never released proof of the bidding. Even the appearance of impropriety is reason to recuse a judge whenever it may be “reasonable be questioned.” It goes even further: Blum and Feinstein both knew that this transaction has the appearance of corruption and a Federal Judge would be compelled to recuse themselves from such a case if “his spouse or minor child residing in his household, has a financial interest in the subject matter in controversy or in a party to the proceeding, or any other interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding.”

California Gold Rush
To all my friends in California – it’s time to leave. Florida has good weather and no state income tax. It is the number one state in economic growth and job creation most of the time with over 3% and Orlando, even back in 2014, was the top city in the USA for job growth coming in at 3.7%. California is on target for going BUST in 2021. It already has the HIGHEST taxes in the USA and Gov. Jerry Brown’s administration miscalculated costs for the state Medi-Cal program, which is their excuse, by $1.9 billion last year. This is just a oversight that contributed to Brown’s projection of a deficit in the upcoming budget. However, Medi-Cal covers illegal immigrants. There is NO REQUIREMENT whatsoever to have a citizenship OR a resident status paying taxes. Hello! Yes call Trump a racist and secede because you want to cover everyone even if they do not pay taxes on the cash they earn. No wonder they do not want a wall. All of Mexico can go to California for free healthcare unlimited.
Only a handful of states, including California, Nebraska, North Carolina, North Dakota, Rhode Island, and Vermont, currently tax ALL retirement income and don’t provide any general income exclusion for seniors.
Worse still, California taxes people who retire and move to other states. So it may be best to get out before it is TOO LATE! Under federal law, states are now clearly prohibited from taxing certain retirement income unless you’re a resident of, or domiciled in, that state. California was attempting to tax people in other states claiming they earned their pension in California. The federal law applies to all qualified plans (for example, 401(k), profit-sharing, and defined benefit plans), IRAs, 403(b) plans, 457(b) plans, and governmental plans. So if you sell your home and get out and domicile in a state that does not tax pensions, you are OK on this level. However, the law provides only limited protection for other (nonqualified) deferred compensation plan benefits. This is called “top-hat” plan benefits that are paid over an employee’s lifetime, or over a period of at least 10 years. Stock options, stock appreciation rights (SARs), and restricted stock are not meaning California is completely free to tax these benefits even after you relocate.
How much longer can this California Dreaming continue? Our computer says 2021. It’s time to leave before they impose an exit tax.


28 U.S. Code § 455 – Disqualification of justice, judge, or magistrate judge

(a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.
(b) He shall also disqualify himself in the following circumstances:
(1) Where he has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding;
(2) Where in private practice he served as lawyer in the matter in controversy, or a lawyer with whom he previously practiced law served during such association as a lawyer concerning the matter, or the judge or such lawyer has been a material witness concerning it;
(3) Where he has served in governmental employment and in such capacity participated as counsel, adviser or material witness concerning the proceeding or expressed an opinion concerning the merits of the particular case in controversy;
(4) He knows that he, individually or as a fiduciary, or his spouse or minor child residing in his household, has a financial interest in the subject matter in controversy or in a party to the proceeding, or any other interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding;
(5) He or his spouse, or a person within the third degree of relationship to either of them, or the spouse of such a person:
(i) Is a party to the proceeding, or an officer, director, or trustee of a party;
(ii) Is acting as a lawyer in the proceeding;
(iii) Is known by the judge to have an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding;
(iv) Is to the judge’s knowledge likely to be a material witness in the proceeding.
(c) A judge should inform himself about his personal and fiduciary financial interests, and make a reasonable effort to inform himself about the personal financial interests of his spouse and minor children residing in his household.
(d) For the purposes of this section the following words or phrases shall have the meaning indicated:
(1) “proceeding” includes pretrial, trial, appellate review, or other stages of litigation;
(2) the degree of relationship is calculated according to the civil law system;
(3) “fiduciary” includes such relationships as executor, administrator, trustee, and guardian;
(4) “financial interest” means ownership of a legal or equitable interest, however small, or a relationship as director, adviser, or other active participant in the affairs of a party, except that:
(i) Ownership in a mutual or common investment fund that holds securities is not a “financial interest” in such securities unless the judge participates in the management of the fund;
(ii) An office in an educational, religious, charitable, fraternal, or civic organization is not a “financial interest” in securities held by the organization;
(iii) The proprietary interest of a policyholder in a mutual insurance company, of a depositor in a mutual savings association, or a similar proprietary interest, is a “financial interest” in the organization only if the outcome of the proceeding could substantially affect the value of the interest;
(iv) Ownership of government securities is a “financial interest” in the issuer only if the outcome of the proceeding could substantially affect the value of the securities.
(e) No justice, judge, or magistrate judge shall accept from the parties to the proceeding a waiver of any ground for disqualification enumerated in subsection (b). Where the ground for disqualification arises only under subsection (a), waiver may be accepted provided it is preceded by a full disclosure on the record of the basis for disqualification.
(f) Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this section, if any justice, judge, magistrate judge, or bankruptcy judge to whom a matter has been assigned would be disqualified, after substantial judicial time has been devoted to the matter, because of the appearance or discovery, after the matter was assigned to him or her, that he or she individually or as a fiduciary, or his or her spouse or minor child residing in his or her household, has a financial interest in a party (other than an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome), disqualification is not required if the justice, judge, magistrate judge, bankruptcy judge, spouse or minor child, as the case may be, divests himself or herself of the interest that provides the grounds for the disqualification.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 908; Pub. L. 93–512, § 1, Dec. 5, 1974, 88 Stat. 1609; Pub. L. 95–598, title II, § 214(a), (b), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2661; Pub. L. 100–702, title X, § 1007, Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4667; Pub. L. 101–650, title III, § 321, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5117.


Makes sense to me … lol


Thursday, January 19, 2017 12:03 PM

How God Created Texans…

Just had to share”!  Still laughing!
When God created the world for humankind to prosper & multiply, He decided to give each group two (2) virtues. As an example, He made the Japanese patient & hardworking, He made the Germans tenacious & hard-headed, He made the Americans organized & pragmatic, And so on.
When God considered Texans, He told the record-keeping angel, “Texans are going to be intelligent, honest, & democrats.” When God finished creating the world, the angel noticed that God had given every group two (2) virtues except the Texans, who had recv’d three (3).The angel thought that this would give the Texans an unfair advantage over the other groups of human beings. He pointed this out to God.

God said, “Oh, my goodness, you are certainly right, but since virtues given by God cannot be changed, We…

View original post 78 more words


To all my face book friends thanks for the well wishes on my birthday they were all welcome and way too many to individually thank; so I’ve taken the easy way out with this ….

Thank You !


Stunning waterfalls on Uluru after freak storm hits the Australian rock

Everything here is bad there are still some wonders to see!


From Sky News

A once-in-50-year downpour turns the iconic Australian landmark into a series of rivers and lakes.

Stunning waterfalls on Uluru. Pic: Parks Australia
Image Caption:Waterfalls were seen all over the huge sandstone rock. Pic: Parks Australia

A freak storm has turned one of Australia’s most famous and driest attractions into a series of spectacular waterfalls.

Uluru in Central Australia normally gets on average just 22cm of rain a year.

Waterfalls run down Uluru. Pic: @BiancaH80 and @waginski
Image Caption:Water runs off Uluru after the storm. Pic: @BiancaH80 and @waginski

But a huge Christmas night storm saw more than 23cm fall in 24 hours – a record amount – sending water cascading down the enormous sandstone rock and turning small canyons into raging torrents.

Waterfalls run down Uluru. Pics: @BiancaH80 and @waginski
Image Caption:Water tumbling down the landmark is highly unusual. Pic: @BiancaH80 and @waginski

Described as a once-in-50-year event by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology, the downpour was photographed by school teachers Bianca and Lee Hewes.

Waterfalls run down Uluru. Pic: @BiancaH80 and @waginski
Image Caption:The heavy…

View original post 132 more words

Wednesday Cute! — Fellowship of the Minds

It is Cute!


Are you stressed out? You won’t be after watching these sea otters at the Vancouver Aquarium hold hands as they float on their backs. 🙂 ~Eowyn

via Wednesday Cute! — Fellowship of the Minds

Reblogged on kommonsentsjane/blogkommonsents.

Awhhhh! So cute.


View original post

Friends, Americans, World Citizens, lend me your ears;

istanbul 06052013

Friends, Americans, World Citizens, lend me your ears;

I come to bury the Clinton email scandal, not to praise her.

The evil that politicians do lives after them;

The good is oft interred with their bones;

So let it be with Clinton scandals. The noble Mr Comey

Hath told you Hillary Clinton was ambitious and extremely careless:

If it were so, it was a grievous fault and reckless for a president,

And grievously hath Clinton answer’d it denying any classified abuse thrice.

Here, under leave of Mr. Comey and the rest–

For Mr. Comey is an honourable man;

So are they all, all honourable political men and women in the Obama administration–

Come I to speak in Clinton’s campaign.

She claims she was a friend of the people, faithful to all:

But Mr. Comey says she was ambitious and extremely careless;

And Mr. Comey and Democrats are of course honourable men.

She hath accepted many donations from foreign governments to become the first woman president

and bankers as well whose vast sums did the general coffers of her foundation fill:

Surely, my listeners, she fairly sold her influence for fair value and did not cheat them.

Nay, I say to thee, Clinton did only a tad more than any other politician who seeks riches from office.

Did this in Clinton seem ambitious and extremely careless intent only on becoming president?

When that the poor have cried and protested over water, did not Clinton hath wept:

Ambition should be made of sterner stuff:

Yet Mr. Comey says Clinton was ambitious and extremely careless;

And Mr. Comey is an honourable man.

You all did see that Clinton denied ever sending anything classified

Yet Mr. Comey presented claims that would deny her that veracity crown,

Which she did thrice proclaim: was this ambition and extremely careless?

Yet Mr. Comey says Clinton was ambitious, a liar, and extremely careless;

And, sure, Mr. Comey is an honourable man.

I speak not to disprove what Mr. Comey spoke,

But here I am to speak what I do know.

You all did love Clinton once, not without cause:

What cause withholds you then, to mourn for her misfortune now?

O judgment! thou art fled to brutish beasts,

And men have lost their reason. Bear with me; she is a woman. Surely that alone is qualification.

What else doth matter? Should our arrogance expect true integrity as leader of the world?

My heart is in the coffin there with the image of justice, freedom, and American apple pie,

And I must pause till it come back to me.



(Adaptation of Marc Antony’s speech upon Caesar’s Death from Shakespeare)